2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Media Release
MEDIA RELEASE 7 February 2017 Premier awards Tennyson Medal at SACE Merit Ceremony The Premier of South Australia, the Hon. Jay Weatherill MP, awarded the prestigious Tennyson Medal for excellence in English Studies to 2016 Year 12 graduate, Ashleigh Jones at the SACE Merit Ceremony at Government House today. The ceremony, in its twenty-ninth year, saw 996 students awarded with 1302 subject merits for outstanding achievement in SACE Stage 2 subjects. Subject merits are awarded to students who gain an overall subject grade of A+ and demonstrate exceptional achievement in that subject. As part of the Merit Ceremony, His Excellency the Hon. Hieu Van Le AC, the Governor of South Australia, presented the following awards: Governor of South Australia Commendation for outstanding overall achievement in the SACE (twenty-five recipients in 2016) Governor of South Australia Commendation — Aboriginal Student SACE Award for the Aboriginal student with the highest overall achievement in the SACE Governor of South Australia Commendation – Excellence in Modified SACE Award for the student with an identified intellectual disability who demonstrates outstanding achievement exclusively through SACE modified subjects. The Tennyson Medal dates back to 1901 when the former Governor of South Australia, Lord Tennyson, established the Tennyson Medal to encourage the study of English literature. The long list of recipients includes the late John Bannon AO, 39th Premier of South Australia, who was awarded the medal in 1961. For her Year 12 English Studies, Ashleigh studied works by Henrik Ibsen (A Doll’s House), Zhang Yimou who directed Raise the Red Lantern, and Tennessee Williams (The Glass Menagerie). -
Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-Level Public
Article Journal of Development Policy Life Cycle Policy and Practice 6(1) 9–35, 2021 Analysis of Three © 2021 Aequitas Consulting Pvt. Ltd. and SAGE Australian State-level Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india Public Policies: DOI: 10.1177/2455133321998805 Exploring the journals.sagepub.com/home/jdp Political Dimension of Sustainable Development Kuntal Goswami1,2 and Rolf Gerritsen1 Abstract This article analyses the life cycle of three Australian public policies (Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia’s Strategic Plan [SASP,] and Western Australia’s State Sustainability Strategy [WA’s SSS]). These policies were formulated at the state level and were structured around sustainable development concepts (the environmental, economic, and social dimensions). This study highlights contexts that led to the making of these public policies, as well as factors that led to their discontinuation. The case studies are based on analysis of parliamentary debates, state governments’ budget reports, public agencies’ annual reports, government media releases, and stakeholders’ feedback. The empirical findings highlight the importance of understanding the political dimension of sustainable development. This fact highlights the need to look beyond the traditional three-dimensional view of sustainability when assessing the success (or lack thereof) of sustainable development policies. Equally important, the analysis indicates that despite these policies’ limited success (and even one of these policies not being implemented at all), sustainability policies can have a legacy beyond their life cycle. Hence, the evaluation of these policies is likely to provide insight into the process of policymaking. 1 Charles Darwin University (CDU), Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia. 2 Australian Centre for Sustainable Development Research & Innovation (ACSDRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. -
Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018
AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Parliament in the Periphery: Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018* Mark Dean Research Associate, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University of South Australia * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract This article examines the sixteen years of Labor government in South Australia from 2002 to 2018. With reference to industry policy and strategy in the context of deindustrialisation, it analyses the impact and implications of policy choices made under Premiers Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill in attempts to progress South Australia beyond its growing status as a ‘rustbelt state’. Previous research has shown how, despite half of Labor’s term in office as a minority government and Rann’s apparent disregard for the Parliament, the executive’s ‘third way’ brand of policymaking was a powerful force in shaping the State’s development. This article approaches this contention from a new perspective to suggest that although this approach produced innovative policy outcomes, these were a vehicle for neo-liberal transformations to the State’s institutions. In strategically avoiding much legislative scrutiny, the Rann and Weatherill governments’ brand of policymaking was arguably unable to produce a coordinated response to South Australia’s deindustrialisation in a State historically shaped by more interventionist government and a clear role for the legislature. In undermining public services and hollowing out policy, the Rann and Wethearill governments reflected the path dependency of responses to earlier neo-liberal reforms, further entrenching neo-liberal responses to social and economic crisis and aiding a smooth transition to Liberal government in 2018. INTRODUCTION For sixteen years, from March 2002 to March 2018, South Australia was governed by the Labor Party. -
Volume 40, Number 1 the ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Law.Adelaide.Edu.Au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD
Volume 40, Number 1 THE ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW law.adelaide.edu.au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD The Honourable Professor Catherine Branson AC QC Deputy Chancellor, The University of Adelaide; Former President, Australian Human Rights Commission; Former Justice, Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor William R Cornish CMG QC Emeritus Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Cambridge His Excellency Judge James R Crawford AC SC International Court of Justice The Honourable Professor John J Doyle AC QC Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court of South Australia Professor John V Orth William Rand Kenan Jr Professor of Law, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Professor Emerita Rosemary J Owens AO Former Dean, Adelaide Law School The Honourable Justice Melissa Perry Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor Ivan Shearer AM RFD Sydney Law School The Honourable Margaret White AO Former Justice, Supreme Court of Queensland Professor John M Williams Dame Roma Mitchell Chair of Law and Former Dean, Adelaide Law School ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Editors Associate Professor Matthew Stubbs and Dr Michelle Lim Book Review and Comment Editor Dr Stacey Henderson Associate Editors Charles Hamra, Kyriaco Nikias and Azaara Perakath Student Editors Joshua Aikens Christian Andreotti Mitchell Brunker Peter Dalrymple Henry Materne-Smith Holly Nicholls Clare Nolan Eleanor Nolan Vincent Rocca India Short Christine Vu Kate Walsh Noel Williams Publications Officer Panita Hirunboot Volume 40 Issue 1 2019 The Adelaide Law Review is a double-blind peer reviewed journal that is published twice a year by the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide. A guide for the submission of manuscripts is set out at the back of this issue. -
The South Australian Government Gazette
No. 10 769 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 2010 CONTENTS Page Page Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005—Notice....................................771 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000—Notice.............. 788 Appointments, Resignations, Etc...............................................770 Proclamations ............................................................................ 816 Corporations and District Councils—Notices............................863 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................... 864 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notice ...............................................771 REGULATIONS Development Act 1993—Notices..............................................771 Development Act 1993 (No. 18 of 2010) .............................. 846 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Notice 2010......795 Crown Land Management Act 2009 (No. 19 of 2010) .......... 848 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Policy 2010—Notice..............................................................796 (No. 20 of 2010)................................................................. 851 Equal Opportunity Tribunal—Notice ........................................771 (No. 21 of 2010)................................................................. 853 Fisheries Management Act 2007—Notices ...............................776 -
2020–21 Creating Industry's Future Leaders
2020–21 CREATING INDUSTRY’S FUTURE LEADERS “The achievements of the Scholars of the Industry Leaders Fund were a highlight of the Awards Ceremony I officiated at last year. It is really pleasing to see more companies and their leaders recognising that investment in the leader’s brain is likely to generate an ROI at least equal to and often far in excess of investment in equipment or the IOT. The impressive results generated by leaders who have undertaken courses supported by ILF funding is proof that these enlightened companies are on the right track.” — David Penberthy FIVEaa’s Breakfast show co-host, The Australian journalist and Sunday Mail columnist 4 What We Do 5 CEO, Geoff Vogt 6 The Board 7 Colin J Peters AM Memorial Award 9 Foundation / History 10 2020 Scholars 21 Through The Years 22 ILF Scholars Network Update 24 Past Scholars 26. 2019 30. 2018 33. 2017 36. 2016 38. 2015 41. 2014 45. 2013 47. 2012 48. 2011 49. 2010 50 Information & Contacts contents3 WHAT WE DO know someone with future wealth-creating opportunities recognition and achievement sharing the benefits of talent leadership potential? for our state The significant growth and diversity We believe in the value of learning The Industry Leaders Fund (ILF) ILF Scholars will be equipped in ILF applications is testament to the for the common good and are offers grants of up to $50,000 to re-establish a “head office” mentality quality of the fund and the widespread committed to supporting those to leaders and future leaders of South for our state by generating world industry support for leadership training who share this belief. -
Front Section2010 V2.Indd
ANNUAL REPORT 31 December 2009 July 2010 © SACE Board of South Australia ABN 87 604 513 459 ISBN 978 1 74102 731 0 (online version) ISBN 978 1 74102 732 7 (printed version) ISSN 0815–2004 Prepared by the Communications Unit SACE Board of South Australia 60 Greenhill Road Wayville South Australia 5034 Telephone: +61 8 8372 7400 Facsimile: +61 8 8372 7590 Email: [email protected] Website Address: www.sace.sa.edu.au South Australian Certificate of Education 60 Greenhill Road Wayville SA 5034 Phone +61 8 8372 7400 Fax +61 8 8372 7590 [email protected] www.saceboard.sa.edu.au ABN 87 604 513 459 Tuesday 30 March 2010 To the Honourable Jay Weatherill, MP Minister for Education Dear Minister I am pleased to submit the 2009 Annual Report of the SACE Board of South Australia, in accordance with the SACE Board of South Australia Act 1983 and the Department of Premier and Cabinet Circular, PC013 — Annual Reporting Requirements (September 2009). This report documents the activities and achievements of the SACE Board of South Australia for the period 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009. Yours sincerely Allan Dooley Presiding Member of the Board SACE Board of South Australia CONTENTS Presiding Member’s Statement 1 Chief Executive’s Statement 2 The SACE Board of South Australia 4 Plans and Objectives 7 Curriculum, Assessment, and Standards 9 Curriculum 9 Recognition of Other Learning 11 Quality Assurance 13 Assessment 14 Implementation of the new SACE 16 Policy Framework for the new SACE 16 Assessment and Reporting Model 16 Leaders Professional -
A Better Future for All Our Children: the Why and The
i C A N Impacts of Child Abuse & Neglect With evidence we can change Life Trajectories A better future for all our children: The Why and the How Showcasing new evidence on the Health, Social & Economic costs of failing our most vulnerable children Exploring the elements of an evidence-informed system response. Date/time: Monday August 16th 9:00am to 2:00pm “Purpose Drives Strategy” Location: SAHMRI Auditorium, Adelaide CE Dept of Premier & Cabinet 2021 Forum Program Chair first session: Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington Deputy Vice Chancellor Research, UniSA 9:15 Open Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington DVC Research, University of South Australia 9:20 Professor Leonie Segal: The Why - Health, Social & Economic Consequences of Child Maltreatment The theory (causal pathways) and empirical evidence on the impact of child abuse and neglect on early death, ED presentations, intergenerational transmission, and child development. The case for a new approach that prioritises infants, children, and their families. Includes a short Q & A. 10:15 Helen Connolly: SA Commissioner for Children and Young People The Why? What children say about their lives and the things that matter to them. 10:25 Thrive by Five, CEO Jay Weatherill The How? A focus on early childhood education. Break 10:40 - 11:00 Chair second session: Penny Wright, Guardian for Children and Young People, SA 11:00 Professor Leonie Segal – Elements of an evidence-based response – Needs-driven early child development and parent-infant services. Build on SA Children’s Centres as a universal platform- to offer a response proportionate to need, with cross portfolio governance including Education, Health, Human Services, DCP. -
'Aussie Bloke': Gender, Class and Contextualizing a Hegemony Of
Looking out for the ‘Aussie Bloke’: Gender, Class and Contextualizing a Hegemony of Working-Class Masculinities in Australia. Kirsty Whitman School of Humanities and Social Science Discipline of Gender Studies and Social Analysis (60%) and Politics (40%). Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2013. Contents Abstract …..v Declaration ….. vi Acknowledgements ….. vii Introduction …..1 Contextualizing a Hegemony of Centralizing Working-Class Masculinity ….. 5 Gender and Legitimate Australian-ness ….. 10 Format and Structure ….. 12 Chapter 1: Theorizing the ‘Aussie Bloke’: Gender, Masculinities, Class and the Hegemony of Centralizing Working-Class Masculinities Introduction ….. 21 Gender and Masculinity ….. 23 Modern and Postmodern Accounts of Gender: Masculinity Theory, Sexuality and Discourse ….. 25 Masculinity/Masculinities: Debates and Clarifications ….. 28 Recognizing Variations and Fluidity: Multiple Masculinities ….. 33 Contextualizing Hegemonic Masculinity/Masculinities, Hegemony and Men ….. 37 Hegemony, Gender and Class ….. 46 Intersections of Class and Gender ….. 49 Class: Moving Beyond Economic Categories ….. 50 Theoretical Conclusions and Use of Terms ….. 61 Conclusion ….. 64 Chapter 2: It’s Not Just Something Working-Class Men Do: The Methodological Journey to a Discursive Approach to Centralizing Working-Class Masculinities Introduction ….. 67 Identifying as a Working-Class Woman ….. 70 Terminology: The Methodological Journey to Centralizing Working-Class Masculinity ….. 73 Qualitative Methodology and Feminist Research ….. 75 ii Critical Discourse and Textual Analysis ….. 78 Recruitment of Participants ….. 83 The Reflexive Standpoint of the Participants: Gender, Class and Mistrust of Academic Elites ….. 87 Gender as an Issue ….. 88 Culture and Class ….. 91 Telephone Interviews ….. 92 Question Choice ….. 95 Reading the Unsaid ….. 96 Changes in Scope and Methodology: The Eventual Structure of this Study …. -
Winter 2016 a Publication of South Australian Native Title Services
Aboriginal Way Issue 63, Winter 2016 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services NAIDOC Week Jack Buckskin performing at NAIDOC ceremony. Full story and more photos on page 11. Photo: Clark Rodda at Festival Photo. Inside: APY Land Rights Act changes 6 Recognition or Treaty – is there an either/or choice? 8 Reconciliation Day 14 National Sorry Day 22 State Government seeks social and community consent for new nuclear waste site The South Australian Government is currently looking to set up a nuclear waste storage facility in the state. The facility would receive and store used nuclear fuel and intermediate level waste from overseas. The state nuclear waste site would be in addition to a new Federal Government nuclear waste site, which has been proposed for Barnidoota north of Port Augusta, situated on Adnyamathanha land. The South Australian Government dump was recommended by the final report of the Royal Commission into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle which was released in May 2016. The report rejected the idea of further mining or processing of uranium, or nuclear power generation, but said that a waste facility could generate Above left: Khatija Thomas. Above right: SANTS CEO Keith Thomas. considerable income for the state. landowners to launch an alliance to The Government has also established a the work of CARA, the Nuclear Fuel Cycle protest the two dumps. new unit within the Department of Royal Commission Consultation and Social consent Premier and Cabinet – the Nuclear Fuel Response Advisory Board. The No Dump Alliance says on its Cycle Royal Commission Consultation means that there website that “South Australia is a proud Mr Parry Agius is a member of and Response Agency (CARA), which needs to be sufficient state rich in possibilities, clever people, that Board, he was selected for his will “aid community understanding culture, creativity and breathtaking commitment to effective consultation broad public support of the Royal Commission’s report and nature. -
An Inquiry Into Contemporary Australian Extreme Right
THE OTHER RADICALISM: AN INQUIRY INTO CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIAN EXTREME RIGHT IDEOLOGY, POLITICS AND ORGANIZATION 1975-1995 JAMES SALEAM A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy Department Of Government And Public Administration University of Sydney Australia December 1999 INTRODUCTION Nothing, except being understood by intelligent people, gives greater pleasure, than being misunderstood by blunderheads. Georges Sorel. _______________________ This Thesis was conceived under singular circumstances. The author was in custody, convicted of offences arising from a 1989 shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, Representative to Australia of the African National Congress. On October 6 1994, I appeared for Sentence on another charge in the District Court at Parramatta. I had been convicted of participation in an unsuccessful attempt to damage a vehicle belonging to a neo-nazi informer. My Thesis -proposal was tendered as evidence of my prospects for rehabilitation and I was cross-examined about that document. The Judge (whose Sentence was inconsequential) said: … Mr Saleam said in evidence that his doctorate [sic] of philosophy will engage his attention for the foreseeable future; that he has no intention of using these exertions to incite violence.1 I pondered how it was possible to use a Thesis to incite violence. This exercise in courtroom dialectics suggested that my thoughts, a product of my experiences in right-wing politics, were considered acts of subversion. I concluded that the Extreme Right was ‘The Other Radicalism’, understood by State agents as odorous as yesteryear’s Communist Party. My interest in Extreme Right politics derived from a quarter-century involvement therein, at different levels of participation. -
Foi30/6148 3
Doc. 102 RELEASED UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RELEASED UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RELEASED UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RELEASED UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION RELEASED UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Doc. 103 There is mounting evidence that the coldest minima measured by the Bureau’s weather stations have not been entered into ADAM (Australian Data Archive for Meteorology). This is because of limits placed on the recording of temperatures below minus 10 degrees Celsius. The Bureau has not prevented the coldest minimum temperatures from being entered into the national data base. There are standard quality control measures applied to extreme temperatures to verify that they are real, and not the result of an error in the observing system (such as may be due to instrumental error or errors in the transmission of the data to the Bureau). This process is analogously applied to rainfall and other meteorological observations, since experience has shown that extreme values should be subject to verification. This is additional to the Bureau closing stations in cold locations, for example Charlotte Pass – while opening new stations in hot places. The Bureau’s method for analysing Australian temperature trends accounts for changes in the observing network over time. The network changes for a range of reasons. For example, during the early period of record, observations expanded with the settlement of the continent. More recently, changing infrastructure requirements has led to a shift in the siting of some instruments. The process of accounting for these changes has been independently reviewed by a panel of international experts and through the recent Technical Advisory Forum.