DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of Investigation United Nations Administration, Part II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of Investigation United Nations Administration, Part II THE MANAGEMENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME Volume IV - Report of Investigation United Nations Administration, Part II The Cost of Administering the Programme Assessment of Programme Oversight Management of Programme Funds Performance of the UN-Related Agencies Programme Financial Statistics Major Recommendations with Proposals for Implementation Glossary Paul A. Volcker, Chairman Richard J. Goldstone, Member Mark Pieth, Member September 7, 2005 www.iic-offp.org INDEPENDENT INQUIRY COMMITTEE INTO THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT OF THE OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME VOLUME IV - TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – THE COST OF ADMINISTERING THE PROGRAMME ...............1 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY.................................................................... 1 II. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 4 III. BUDGETING FOR PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.................. 5 A. PROGRAMME BUDGETING PROCESS...................................................................... 5 B. THE ROLE OF ACABQ.......................................................................................... 6 IV. PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS..................................................... 9 A. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RELATING TO RESOLUTION 986 .................................... 9 B. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RELATING TO RESOLUTIONS 1472 AND 1476 ............. 17 C. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS RELATING TO RESOLUTION 1483 ................................ 20 D. SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND FEES.............................................. 25 V. FUNDING SOURCES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND FEES.......... 27 A. PROGRAMME SUPPORT COSTS ............................................................................ 27 B. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS.................................................................................... 29 C. FEES PAID UNDER RESOLUTIONS 1472, 1476, AND 1483.................................... 33 D. SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES....................................................................... 34 VI. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................... 35 VII. ANNEX: LETTER RELATING TO RESOLUTION 1483 COSTS................. 37 CHAPTER 2 – ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMME OVERSIGHT ..........................41 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY.................................................................. 41 II. OVERSIGHT FUNCTIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM............ 43 A. INTERNAL OVERSIGHT ........................................................................................ 43 B. EXTERNAL OVERSIGHT ....................................................................................... 44 III. INTERNAL AUDITS OF THE AGENCIES ...................................................... 46 A. COVERAGE AND TIMING ..................................................................................... 46 B. PLANNING AND SCOPE ........................................................................................ 47 C. FUNDING AND STAFFING..................................................................................... 48 D. INTERNAL AUDIT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 50 E. CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND REPORTING ........................................................... 51 F. OVERSIGHT COORDINATION ............................................................................... 53 i INDEPENDENT INQUIRY COMMITTEE INTO THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT OF THE OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME VOLUME IV - TABLE OF CONTENTS IV. EXTERNAL AUDITS........................................................................................... 55 A. INTRODUCTION TO THE BOARD OF AUDITORS..................................................... 55 B. STANDARDS ........................................................................................................ 56 C. EXTERNAL AUDITS OF THE IRAQ ACCOUNT ........................................................ 57 D. EXTERNAL AUDITS OF THE AGENCIES ................................................................ 61 V. INVESTIGATIONS............................................................................................... 64 A. INTRODUCTION TO OIOS INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION ......................................... 64 B. INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS .................................................................................... 65 C. FUNDING AND STAFFING..................................................................................... 67 D. PROGRAMME-RELATED INVESTIGATIONS ........................................................... 69 VI. OTHER OVERSIGHT FUNCTIONS ................................................................. 74 A. MONITORING EVALUATION AND CONSULTING ................................................... 74 B. JOINT INSPECTION UNIT...................................................................................... 74 VII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................... 75 VIII. ANNEX 1: INTERNAL AUDIT REPORTS OF THE AGENCIES ................. 79 IX. ANNEX 2: EXTERNAL AUDITS OF THE IRAQ ACCOUNT....................... 81 X. ANNEX 3: EXTERNAL AUDITS OF THE AGENCIES.................................. 82 CHAPTER 3 – MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMME FUNDS .................................85 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY.................................................................. 85 II. PROGRAMME BANKING.................................................................................. 87 A. COMMON PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES FOR INVESTMENTS..................................... 87 B. ACCOUNT ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................ 90 C. PROGRAMME INVESTMENTS................................................................................ 92 III. TREASURY’S CONCERNS REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMME FUNDS ....................................................................................... 94 A. CREDIT RISK ....................................................................................................... 94 B. SHIFT TO TRANSACTING OIL SALES IN EUROS .................................................... 98 IV. RETURNS ON PROGRAMME FUNDS .......................................................... 100 A. ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRAMME INTEREST AND EARNINGS .............................. 100 B. ANALYSIS OF RETURNS..................................................................................... 101 C. INTEREST REMITTED BY THE UN-RELATED AGENCIES..................................... 104 V. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS.................................................................... 107 ii INDEPENDENT INQUIRY COMMITTEE INTO THE UNITED NATIONS OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT OF THE OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAMME VOLUME IV - TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4 – PERFORMANCE OF THE UN-RELATED AGENCIES ..............109 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY................................................................ 109 II. THE THREE NORTHERN GOVERNORATES............................................. 111 A. SADDAM HUSSEIN AND THE THREE NORTHERN GOVERNORATES..................... 111 B. THE PROGRAMME IN THE THREE NORTHERN GOVERNORATES ......................... 112 C. FUNDING........................................................................................................... 114 III. PROGRAMME-RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AGENCIES........................................................................................................... 116 A. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION........................................................ 116 B. INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ............................................... 116 C. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ............................................... 117 D. UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION................................................................................................. 117 E. UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME ................................... 118 F. UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND................................................................ 118 G. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR PROJECT SERVICES............................................ 119 H. WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME.............................................................................. 119 I. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION...................................................................... 120 IV. PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE AGENCIES’ CORE COMPETENCIES......... 122 A. UNESCO’S CHALK FACTORY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ................................. 122 B. UN-HABITAT’S CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENCES.............................................. 126 C. WHO’S HOSPITAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS .................................................. 130 D. ITU’S TELECOMMUNICATION REHABILITATION PROJECT................................. 137 V. INSUFFICIENT MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION, AND OVERSIGHT ............................................................................................. 140 A. INEFFECTIVE COORDINATION............................................................................ 140 B. UNCLEAR LINES OF AUTHORITY ....................................................................... 142 C. SHORTAGE OF QUALIFIED STAFF ...................................................................... 148 D. MANIPULATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corporate Leadership in the World Economy
    *• •/" The ..Global Compact Corporate Leadership in the World Economy Let us choose to unite the power of markets with the authority of universal ideals. Let us choose to reconcile the creative forces of private entrepreneurship with the needs of the disadvantaged and the requirements of future generations. ;;.,' ' - — Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations United Nations The Opportunity Hundreds of companies have become participants in the Global Compact, which is rapidly evolving into the first global forum designed to address critical issues related to globalization. Announced by United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 1999, and formally launched at United Nations Headquarters in July 2000, the Compact calls on companies _ to embrace nine universal principles in the areas of human rights, labour standards and the environment. It brings companies together with United Nations organizations, international labour, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other parties to foster partnerships and to build a more inclusive and equitable global marketplace. It aims, in the,, words of Secretary-General Kofi Annan, to contribute to the emergence of "shared-values and principles, which-give.a ~ - human face to the global market." '." - The companies engaged in the Global Compact are diverse and represent different industries and-geographic regions. But they have two features in common: they are all leaders; and they all aspire to manage global growth in a ' responsible manner that takes into consideration the interests and concerns 0jF;fl broad spectrum of stakeholders - including employees, investors, customers, advocacy groups, business partners, and communities. Corporate leaders participating in the Global Compact agree that globalization, which only a few years ago was seen by many as an inevitable and unstoppable economic trend, in fact is highly fragile and may have an uncertain future.
    [Show full text]
  • Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC)
    Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) “ Sicherheit und Entwicklung – zwei Seiten einer Medaille ? “ Werner Rauber, Head Peacekeeping Studies Department am KAIPTC Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Vernetzte Sicherheit und Entwicklung in Afrika Das Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) in Accra / Ghana - Zielsetzung und Erfahrungen Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Wo liegt Ghana? Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Großfriedrichsburg Gebäude im Fort Großfriedrichsburg nach einer Vorgabe aus dem Jahre 1708 Gebäude im Fort Großfriedrichsburg im März 2009 Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) Jan 2004 2 Sep 2002 23 Sep 2003 Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre (KAIPTC) History 1998 Direktive zur Einrichtung des KAIPTC veröffentlicht 2001 Arbeitsbeginn Kommandant und Planungsstab Jan 2002 Deutschland gewährt eine Anschubfinanzierung von €2.6M Mar 2002 Zielvorgabe und Realisierungsplan erstellt May 2002 Großbritannien steigt in die Finanzierung mit ein. Sep 2002 Baubeginn unter deutscher Bauleitung Nov 2003 Phase 1 abgeschlossen (GE funding) Nov 2003 1. Kurs ( DDR ) am KAIPTC durchgeführt Jan 2004 Offizielle Eröffnung am 24. Januar 2004 Late 2005 Abschluss Phase 2 (UK/NL/IT funding) Ab 06/2006 Weiterentwicklung Organisations-/Managmentstruktur Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping TrainingMess Centre (KAIPTC)
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion
    U.S. JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION U.S. JAPAN Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA 1819 L St NW #300 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY SASAKAWA USA SASAKAWA PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin and Daniel E. Bob ISBN 9780996656764 51000 > 9 780996 656764 U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin Daniel E. Bob Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA is an independent, American non-profit and non- partisan institution devoted to research, analysis and better understanding of the U.S.-Japan relationship. Sasakawa USA accomplishes its mission through programs that benefit both nations and the broader Asia Pacific region. Our research programs focus on security, diplomacy, economics, trade and technology, and our education programs facilitate people-to-people exchange and discussion among American and Japanese policymakers, influential citizens and the broader public in both countries. ISBN: 978-0-9966567-6-4 Printed in the United States of America. © 2017 by Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA LCCN Number applied for Sasakawa USA does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views expressed herein are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Sasakawa USA, its staff or its board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by and means without permission in writing from Sasakawa USA. Please direct inquiries to: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Research Department 1819 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 P: +1 202-296-6694 This publication can be downloaded at no cost at http://spfusa.org/ Cover photo: © EPA/Barbara Walton Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................v Dennis Blair and Yasushi Akashi INTRODUCTION U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 205 Session of the Unesco Executive Board Draft
    Check ‐ Against ‐ Delivery 205 SESSION OF THE UNESCO EXECUTIVE BOARD DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT BY DR. MATTHEW OPOKU‐PREMPEH GHANA’S REPRESENTATIVE AND LEADER OF DELEGATION TO THE 205 SESSION OF THE UNESCO EXECUTIVE BOARD Paris, France ********************************* Chairman of the Executive Board, President of the General Conference, Director General of UNESCO, Distinguished Representatives, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen. The Ghana delegation joins previous speakers to congratulate you Madam Director - General for the detailed elaboration of programs and activities of the Secretariat since your assumption of office. Ghana is happy to see your sustained efforts to deliver on the programs approved by the General Conference. Ghana endorses the statement made on behalf of the Africa group. Mr. Chairman, last month, Mr. Kofi Annan, the 7th Secretary-General of the United Nations, the first from sub-Saharan Africa to occupy this important position was laid to rest in his home soil of Ghana. On behalf of H.E. Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo, President of the people of Ghana, I 1 Check ‐ Against ‐ Delivery wish to extend our heartfelt gratitude to the entire United Nations, led by the Secretary-General, His Excellency António Gutierres, and the whole international community for the outpouring of grief and condolences that we received at his passing. On this occasion Mr. Chairman, allow me to reiterate that Kofi Annan’s passionate and profound belief that a stronger and better-organized United Nations would make the world a better place, is an ideal that should not be allowed to die. On the draft budget for 2020-2021, Ghana is satisfied with the Director– General’s proposal for a regular budget ceiling corresponding to Zero Real Growth, which includes 11 million USD of the unspent funds under the 38 C/5.
    [Show full text]
  • Official General Report on Northern Iraq (April 2000) Contents Page
    Official general report on Northern Iraq (April 2000) Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Information on the country 6 2.1. Basic facts 6 2.1.1. Country and people 6 2.1.2. History 8 2.2. System of government 17 2.3. Political developments 20 2.3.1. Internal relations 20 2.3.2. External forces 31 2.4. Security situation 36 2.5. Social and economic situation 48 2.6. Conclusions 53 3. Human rights 55 3.1. Safeguards 55 3.1.1. Constitution 55 3.1.2. Other national legislation 55 3.1.3. Conventions 56 3.2. Monitoring 56 3.3. Respect and violations 58 3.3.1. Freedom of opinion 58 3.3.2. Freedom of association and of assembly 59 3.3.3. Freedom of religion 60 3.3.4. Freedom of movement 73 3.3.5. Judicial process 83 3.3.6. Arrest and detention 84 3.3.7. Maltreatment and torture 87 3.3.8. Extra-judicial executions and murders 87 10804/00 dre/LG/mc 2 DG H I EN 3.3.9. Death penalty 87 3.4. Position of specific groups 88 3.4.1. Turkmens 88 3.4.2. Staff of international organisations 91 3.4.3. Conscripts, deserters and servicemen 96 3.4.4. Independent intellectuals and journalists 98 3.4.5. Prominent political activists 99 3.4.6. Fayli Kurds 99 3.4.7. Women 101 3.4.8. Orphaned minors 104 3.5. Summary 104 4. Refugees and displaced persons 106 4.1. Motives 106 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    FOUR PAWS – Foundation for Animal Welfare 2016 ANNUAL REPORT More Humanity Towards Animals Contents Editorial 3 Editorial Ladies and gentlemen! 4 Overview Map 6 The Year in Pictures What did we achieve for animals in 2016? At the end of every year, we owe it not 8 Vision, Mission, How We Work only to ourselves but above all to our numerous supporters and interested members 10 Donor Service and PR of the public, to give a detailed response to that question. That's why I'm delighted to be able to give you a comprehensive summary of our work in 2016 in the form of Report On Our Work this annual report. During the past year, FOUR PAWS had 11 national branches Wild Animals and operated in a further 14 countries around the world. Stray animal care 12 Helping Bears teams in eight countries neutered and treated more than 10,000 animals living 16 Helping Big Cats on the streets. Our disaster support campaign organised food for about 10,500 farm animals, preventing them from starving. The team led by vet Dr Amir Khalil 18 Great Apes in Need released 15 zoo animals from the Gaza Strip and saved them from certain death. OWL AND BIRD OF PREY CENTRE, Haringsee 20 At our five bear sanctuaries and three big cat centres, we fed and looked after 74 22 Fur Farming Campaign bears and 107 big cats every day throughout 2016. We were also able to rescue a 24 Campaign for Wild Horses and Working Animals further 17 bears and tigers from terrible conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale-UN Oral History Project Yasushi Akashi James Sutterlin, Interviewer November 28, 1997 New York, New York Session 2
    Yale-UN Oral History Project Yasushi Akashi James Sutterlin, Interviewer November 28, 1997 New York, New York Session 2 James Sutterlin : So, Mr. Akashi at our last session we ended by talking about intelligence and the extent to which you had an intelligence capacity in Cambodia. You said a good bit about it but you might have something you want to add at this point. Yasushi Akashi : There was a very good amount of military intelligence and General Sanderson and I were only the receiving end of intelligence reports, particularly from the United States. Sanderson was somewhat skeptical of some of the quality of intelligence, but we took such intelligence seriously and we evaluated each one of them. I must also add that, in a broad sense, I had a constant exchange of political intelligence with ambassadors. The Japanese ambassador was very adept about dealing with Sihanouk’s psychology. The French Ambassador Phillipe Coste was very good at the goings-on in Prince Sihanouk’s royal family. He was pretty close to his wife, Princess Monique, sometimes to the extent to annoy Sihanouk himself. The American ambassador, Twining, was very methodical, very thorough, and I had a good overall judgment [of him]. Since we lived in the same hotel during the first part of my eighteenth month, we either got together or we had an exchange of “love” notes about the Cambodian situation almost every day. And, the Australian ambassador was interested in developmental issues; he visited projects in the field and reported to me about his impressions. The Chinese 1 ambassador was particularly strong, obviously, about Khmer Rouge psychology and motivations, which he was not very free to share with us, but nevertheless as a conduit to the Khmer Rouge he was very handy.
    [Show full text]
  • International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995
    International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Rapporteur Report The Hague June 29-July 1, 2015 International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Conference in The Hague, June 29 – July 1, 2015 Executive Summary Leading decision-makers from more than a dozen countries gathered in The Hague from June 29 to July 1, 2015, to consider the failure of the international community to protect the United Nations “safe area” of Srebrenica, resulting in the largest massacre in Europe since World War II. Participants included three former members of the UN Security Council, senior government and UN officials, peacekeepers, and eyewitnesses to the Srebrenica tragedy. Over the course of four working sessions, a public event, and numerous informal meetings, conference participants focused on a disastrous two-year chain of events that culminated in the fall of Srebrenica in July 1995. They examined the origins of the “safe area” policy, beginning with the March 1993 visit to Srebrenica by French General Philippe Morillon, and disagreements on how to implement frequently impractical Security Council resolutions. The discussion revealed sharp disconnects between the policy-makers in New York, the peacekeepers on the ground, and the people the “safe areas” were ostensibly designed to keep safe. “I saw this conference as a kind of truth commission,” said Srebrenica survivor Muhamed Duraković. “Twenty years on, we cannot bring back the dead, but we can learn from what went wrong in Srebrenica. If we are not able to go through the process of fact-finding, truth, and reconciliation, we may be creating problems for future generations.” At the heart of the international failure in Srebrenica in July 1995 was the inability of the major powers to devise and implement an agreed strategy for ending the defining conflict of the immediate post-Cold War era.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Annual Sulaimani Forum 2014.Pdf
    SULAIMANI FORUM دﯾﺪاری ﺳﻠﻧﯽ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻰ اﻟﺴﻠﻴﻧﻴﺔ The Second Annual Sulaimani Forum “Navigating Challenges in the Middle East” AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF IRAQ SULAIMANI The American University of Iraq, Sulaimani Sulaimani – Kirkuk Main Road, Raparin Sulaimani, Iraq Tel: +964 (0)53-330-1011 E-mail: [email protected] facebook.com/auis.edu.iq twitter.com/AUIS_news youtube.com/auisvideos The Institute of Regional and International Studies E-mail: [email protected] twitter.com/IRISmideast The Second Annual Sulaimani Forum “Navigating Challenges in the Middle East” American University of Iraq, Sulaimani March 4 & 5, 2014 Conference Proceedings edited by Elizabeth Schmitz Sponsored by Table of Contents 6 Introduction 8 In Their Own Words 12 Executive Summary 14 Opening Plenary Session 18 Iraq: An Insider’s Perspective 24 Iraq’s Challenges in 2014 and Beyond 30 The Iranian Diplomatic ‘Shift’: Understanding Interests, Motives, and Implications 38 Syria’s Current Status and Future Prospects 48 Turkey: Internal Developments and External Relations 56 Realities of Investing in Iraq 62 The Tigris and Euphrates Dilemma: Water as an Instrument for Cooperation across the Region 68 The Future of Ethno-Sectarian Conflicts in the Middle East 74 Iraq Oil Policy: Implications for Domestic Politics, Ramifications for Regional Stability 80 Conclusion 88 #SuliForum on Social Media Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) The Institute of Regional and International Studies (IRIS) examines the region’s most complex issues through rigorous scholarship, advanced research, and open dialogue among academics and influential public leaders. Drawing on the diversity of expertise at AUIS, the Institute researches historic, political, cultural, social, economic, scientific, and anthropological aspects of the KRG, Iraq and the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law
    Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 14 General Editor Managing Editor For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8912 Michael N. Schmitt Louise Arimatsu General Editor Managing Editor Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 14, 2011 123 General Editor Managing Editor Michael N. Schmitt Louise Arimatsu CNWS-ILD Chatham House United States Naval War College The Royal Institute of International Affairs Newport, RI London USA UK Cover Photo: Arab Spring; photo ANP/AFP ISBN 978-90-6704-854-5 ISBN 978-90-6704-855-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-90-6704-855-2 Ó T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the authors 2012 This Volume is also available as a journal product through Cambridge University Press. In addition to the electronic version published on www.springerlink, the Yearbook is also available online through the Cambridge Journals Online service. Published by T.M.C.ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands www.asserpress.nl Produced and distributed for T.M.C.ASSER PRESS by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Saddam Hussein, Saddam Hussein Was the President of Iraq
    Animal Farm Research Chapter.3 By: Zion and Caeleb The world leader we picked was Saddam Hussein, Saddam Hussein was the president of Iraq. He was born on April 28, 1937, in Al-Awja Iraq. Hussein was raised by his mother, her second husband Ibrahim al­Hassan and her brother Khairallah Talfah.Hussein's first wife, Sajida, was his first cousin, the daughter of his maternal uncle Khairallah Talfah. Many of Hussein's family members were part of his regime. Brother­in­law Brig. General Adnan Khairallah was Minister of Defense. Sons­in­law General Hussein Kamel, husband to Raghad Hussein, led Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons program and his brother, Colonel Saddam Kamel, husband to Rana Hussein, was in charge of the presidential security forces. Eldest son Uday was head of the Iraqi Olympic Committee and younger son Qusay was head of the Internal Security Forces. And half­brother Busho Ibrahim was the Deputy Minister of Justice. 1956 ­ Takes part in an unsuccessful coup to overthrow King Faisal II and Prime Minister Nuri as­Said.1957 ­ Hussein formally joins the Baath Socialist Party.July 14, 1958 ­ King Faisal is killed in a coup led by Abdul Karim Kassem.October 1959 ­ Hussein and others attack the motorcade of Abdul Karim Kassem. The assassination attempt fails and most of the attackers are killed. Hussein escapes and flees to Syria. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser hears of Hussein's exploits and arranges for him to travel to Cairo.February 8, 1963 ­ Kassem is overthrown and executed, and the Baath Party takes over.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failures of Intelligence Reform
    Coastal Carolina University CCU Digital Commons Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Honors Theses Studies Fall 12-15-2012 The aiF lures of Intelligence Reform Amber Ciemniewski Coastal Carolina University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Ciemniewski, Amber, "The aiF lures of Intelligence Reform" (2012). Honors Theses. 52. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses/52 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 were a devastating shock to the United States. They alerted Americans to the new threat of non-state actors. National Security had been severely damaged, and the new threat provoked the U.S. to enter into a problematic war in the Middle East region. Immediately after the attacks, the “blame game” began. Though there are seventeen organizations in the United States intelligence community, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) suffered the worst criticism for their roles in failing to prevent the attacks. The Bush administration established the 9/11 Commission in order to investigate what went wrong and to determine how to fix it. Based on the recommendations provided by the Commission, various organizations were changed and/or created in the intelligence community. Out of many changes, two were the most significant.
    [Show full text]