DOCSLIB.ORG

NSCLC Therapeutics in Asia-Pacific Markets to 2019 Personalized Therapies Focus on Untapped Segment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Expand Treatment Pool

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NSCLC Therapeutics in Asia-Pacific Markets to 2019 Personalized Therapies Focus on Untapped Segment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Expand Treatment Pool NSCLC Therapeutics in Asia-Pacific Markets to 2019 Personalized Therapies Focus on Untapped Segment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Expand Treatment Pool GBI Research Report Guidance GBI Research Report Guidance Chapter two provides an overview of the disease, its symptoms, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, classification, epidemiology, prognosis, staging and treatment options. Chapter three provides a detailed profiling and comparative heat map analysis in terms of safety and efficacy for currently marketed products in the NSCLC market. Chapter four presents a detailed pipeline analysis for the disease, including individual product profiles, a comparative efficacy and safety profile heat map analysis of the most promising pipeline products as well as analyses on the distribution of molecule types across the NSCLC developmental pipeline, the molecular targets of pipeline mAbs and the developmental program types. In addition, detailed analyses of the clinical trial failure rates, the clinical trial durations by phase and clinical trial sizes, by participant numbers. Chapter five provides market forecasts for countries across the globe, with special attention given to the APAC countries: India, Australia, China and Japan. The multiple scenario forecasts take into account a range of factors that are likely to vary and provide a clear perspective on the level of the potential degree of variance in the market sizes. Chapter six covers the major deals that have taken place in the disease market in recent years. Coverage includes co-development deals and licensing agreements, which are segmented on the basis of geography and total value. A concomitant analysis of the licensing deal values for products by molecule types and molecular targets is also provided. © GBI Research. This is a licensed product and is not to be photocopied GBIHC326MR / Published MAR 2014 Page 2 Executive Summary Modest growth is driven by Executive Summary the increasing incidence Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutics Market to Witness Modest Growth over Forecast Period population and expected launch of premium-priced The launch of premium-priced targeted therapies has changed the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) pipeline molecules. treatment paradigm and elevated the NSCLC market during the past decade. This growth is expected to continue at a moderate pace during the forecast period, culminating in growth from $XX billion in 2012 to $XX billion by 2019, in Asia-Pacific (APAC). In 2012, Japan and China had respective shares of XX% and XX% in the NSCLC market of APAC. India and Australia had much lower shares of XX% and XX% respectively. An aging population and increasing number of NSCLC incident cases, especially in China and India, drive the growth in the market. The expected launches of premium-priced novel antibodies and immunotherapies in the first and second lines of therapies, targeting both Non-Squamous NSCLC (NOS NSCLC) and Squamous NSCLC (S NSCLC) patients, widen the eligible treatment population, maximize the patient share and ultimately drive market growth. In spite of many expected drug launches, without the risk of generic erosion of currently entrenched therapies, growth is expected to be marginal due to the dominant generic penetration of a few NSCLC drugs in India. A complex and lengthy regulatory pathway and limited reimbursement from national insurance programs, in China, as well as regular price cuts, in Japan, also limit growth in the APAC market. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutics, Asia-Pacific, Market Size ($bn), 2012 and 2019 Market size ($bn)size Market 2012 2019 China India Japan Australia Source: GBI Research Proprietary Marketed Products Database © GBI Research. This is a licensed product and is not to be photocopied GBIHC326MR / Published MAR 2014 Page 3 Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 List of Figures............................................................................................................................ 8 2 Introduction........................................................................................................................................10 2.1 Symptoms ...............................................................................................................................10 2.2 Etiology ...................................................................................................................................11 2.3 Pathophysiology ......................................................................................................................12 2.4 Co-morbidities and Complications ............................................................................................12 2.5 Diagnosis .................................................................................................................................13 2.5.1 Physical Examination........................................................................................................13 2.5.2 Sputum Cytology ..............................................................................................................13 2.5.3 Imaging Tests...................................................................................................................13 2.5.4 Biopsy ..............................................................................................................................14 2.6 Classification............................................................................................................................15 2.6.1 Adenocarcinoma ..............................................................................................................15 2.6.2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma ................................................................................................15 2.6.3 Large Cell Carcinoma ........................................................................................................15 2.7 Epidemiology ...........................................................................................................................15 2.8 Prognosis and Disease Staging ..................................................................................................16 2.8.1 Staging ............................................................................................................................16 2.9 Treatment Options ..................................................................................................................18 2.9.1 Surgery and Radiation Therapy .........................................................................................18 2.9.2 Pharmacological ..............................................................................................................18 2.9.3 Treatment Algorithms and Prescribing Habits ...................................................................20 3 Marketed Products .............................................................................................................................23 3.1 Therapeutic Landscape ............................................................................................................24 3.1.1 Alimta (pemetrexed disodium) – Eli Lilly and Company ......................................................24 3.1.2 Abraxane (nab-paclitaxel) – Celgene .................................................................................26 3.1.3 Iressa (gefitinib) – AstraZeneca .........................................................................................28 3.1.4 Tarceva (erlotinib hydrochloride) – F. Hoffmann-La Roche .................................................29 3.1.5 Xalkori (crizotinib) – Pfizer ................................................................................................31 3.1.6 Avastin (bevacizumab) – F. Hoffmann-La Roche ................................................................32 3.1.7 Gilotrif (afatinib) – Boehringer Ingelheim ..........................................................................34 3.2 Comparative Efficacy and Safety...............................................................................................34 4 Pipeline Products ................................................................................................................................37 4.1 Overall Pipeline........................................................................................................................37 4.2 Pipeline Analysis by Molecule Type ..........................................................................................39 4.3 Pipeline Analysis by Mechanism of Action ................................................................................41 4.4 Clinical Trials ............................................................................................................................44 4.4.1 Failure Rate .....................................................................................................................44 4.4.2 Patient Enrollment and Clinical Trial Size ...........................................................................46 4.4.3 Duration ..........................................................................................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Imaging of Death Receptor 5 Occupancy and Saturation Kinetics in Vivo by Humanized Monoclonal Antibody CS-1008
    Published OnlineFirst September 17, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3104 Clinical Cancer Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis Research Molecular Imaging of Death Receptor 5 Occupancy and Saturation Kinetics In Vivo by Humanized Monoclonal Antibody CS-1008 Ingrid J.G. Burvenich1, Fook T. Lee1, Glenn A. Cartwright1, Graeme J. O'Keefe3, Dahna Makris1, Diana Cao1, Sylvia Gong3, Anderly C. Chueh2, John M. Mariadason2, Martin W. Brechbiel4, Robert A. Beckman5, Kosaku Fujiwara6, Reinhard von Roemeling5, and Andrew M. Scott1,3 Abstract Purpose: CS-1008 (tigatuzumab; phase I/II), an antihuman death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist, induces apoptosis and has cytotoxic activity against human cancer cell lines. This study reports on the preclinical validation of 111In-labeled anti-DR5 humanized antibody CS-1008 as a diagnostic tool to study the DR5 occupancy in patients with cancer and establish dose ranges for receptor saturation kinetics in vivo. Experimental Design: CS-1008 was radiolabeled and characterized for DR5 binding and labeling efficiency on TRAIL-sensitive DR5–positive colorectal cancer cells (COLO 205 and WiDr). Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies were conducted in BALB/c nu/nu mice bearing COLO 205, WiDr, or DR5- negative CT26 colon tumors. Planar gamma camera imaging and computerized tomography (CT) images were obtained to study receptor occupancy in vivo. 111 Results: Scatchard analysis showed high and specific binding affinity (Kd, 1.05 Æ 0.12 nmol/L) of In- labeled CS-1008. 111In-labeled CS-1008 was specifically taken up in mice bearing COLO 205 and WiDr tumors with prolonged tumor retention (26.25 Æ 2.85%ID/g vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Formulary Adherence Checklist
    NICE Technology Appraisals About Medicines: Formulary Adherence Checklist This spreadsheet is updated monthly and enables self-audit of a medicines formulary for adherence to current NICE Technology Appraisals. All guidelines refer to adults unless indicated. No copyright is asserted on this material if used for non-commercial purposes within the NHS. Last updated 18-Jun-19 Technology appraisal Date of TA Availability of medicine for NHS patients with this medical condition, as indicated by (TA) Release NICE Adherence of local formulary to NICE Titles are hyperlinks to Yes N/A Date of local Date of local Time to full guidance (mark 'x' if (mark 'x' if decision decision implement applicable) applicable) Due (90 days) Made (days) 2018-19 TA517 Avelumab for Avelumab for treating metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. 1 treating metastatic 11/04/2018 Evidence-based recommendations on avelumab (Bavencio) for treating metastatic X 10/07/2018 17/12/2018 250 Merkel cell carcinoma (secondary) Merkel cell carcinoma in adults. TA518 Tocilizumab for Tocilizumab for treating giant cell arteritis. 1 treating giant cell 18/04/2018 Evidence-based recommendations on tocilizumab (RoActemra) for treating giant cell X 17/07/2018 16/07/2018 89 arteritis arteritis in adults. Pembrolizumab for treating locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma after TA519 Pembrolizumab platinum-containing chemotherapy. for treating locally Evidence-based recommendations on pembrolizumab (Keytruda) for previously advanced or metastatic treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults. 1 urothelial carcinoma 25/04/2018 X 24/07/2018 04/05/2018 9 after platinum- containing chemotherapy TA520 - Atezolizumab Evidence-based recommendations on atezolizumab (Tecentriq) for locally advanced for treating locally or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after chemotherapy in adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Biological Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After First-Line Treatment: a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials
    REVIEW British Journal of Cancer (2014) 111, 1122–1131 | doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.404 Keywords: colorectal; biological; meta-analysis The role of biological therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line treatment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials E Segelov1, D Chan*,2, J Shapiro3, T J Price4, C S Karapetis5, N C Tebbutt6 and N Pavlakis2 1St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; 2Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; 3Monash University and Cabrini Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; 4The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia; 5Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia and 6Austin Health, VIC 3084, Australia Purpose: Biologic agents have achieved variable results in relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the efficacy of biological therapy. Methods: Major databases were searched for randomised studies of mCRC after first-line treatment comparing (1) standard treatment plus biologic agent with standard treatment or (2) standard treatment with biologic agent with the same treatment with different biologic agent(s). Data were extracted on study design, participants, interventions and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the MERGE criteria. Comparable data were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Twenty eligible studies with 8225 patients were identified. The use of any biologic therapy improved overall survival with hazard ratio (HR) 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.91, Po0.00001), progression-free survival (PFS) with HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.67–0.74, Po0.0001) and overall response rate (ORR) with odds ratio (OR) 2.38 (95% CI 2.03–2.78, Po0.00001).
    [Show full text]
  • EAU-EANM-ESUR-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2019
    EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer N. Mottet (Chair), R.C.N. van den Bergh, E. Briers (Patient Representative), P. Cornford (Vice-chair), M. De Santis, S. Fanti, S. Gillessen, J. Grummet, A.M. Henry, T.B. Lam, M.D. Mason, T.H. van der Kwast, H.G. van der Poel, O. Rouvière, D. Tilki, T. Wiegel Guidelines Associates: T. Van den Broeck, M. Cumberbatch, N. Fossati, T. Gross, M. Lardas, M. Liew, L. Moris, I.G. Schoots, P-P.M. Willemse © European Association of Urology 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 Aims and scope 9 1.2 Panel composition 9 1.2.1 Acknowledgement 9 1.3 Available publications 9 1.4 Publication history and summary of changes 9 1.4.1 Publication history 9 1.4.2 Summary of changes 9 2. METHODS 12 2.1 Data identification 12 2.2 Review 13 2.3 Future goals 13 3. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND AETIOLOGY 13 3.1 Epidemiology 13 3.2 Aetiology 14 3.2.1 Family history / genetics 14 3.2.2 Risk factors 14 3.2.2.1 Metabolic syndrome 14 3.2.2.1.1 Diabetes/metformin 14 3.2.2.1.2 Cholesterol/statins 14 3.2.2.1.3 Obesity 14 3.2.2.2 Dietary factors 14 3.2.2.3 Hormonally active medication 15 3.2.2.3.1 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors 15 3.2.2.3.2 Testosterone 15 3.2.2.4 Other potential risk factors 15 3.2.3 Summary of evidence and guidelines for epidemiology and aetiology 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Activating Death Receptor DR5 As a Therapeutic Strategy for Rhabdomyosarcoma
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Oncology Volume 2012, Article ID 395952, 10 pages doi:10.5402/2012/395952 Review Article Activating Death Receptor DR5 as a Therapeutic Strategy for Rhabdomyosarcoma Zhigang Kang,1, 2 Shi-Yong Sun,3 and Liang Cao1 1 Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 2 Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA 3 Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Liang Cao, [email protected] Received 4 January 2012; Accepted 24 January 2012 Academic Editors: E. Boven and S. Mandruzzato Copyright © 2012 Zhigang Kang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. It is believed to arise from skeletal muscle progenitors, preserving the expression of genes critical for embryonic myogenic development such as MYOD1 and myogenin. RMS is classified as embryonal, which is more common in younger children, or alveolar, which is more prevalent in elder children and adults. Despite aggressive management including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, the outcome for children with metastatic RMS is dismal, and the prognosis has remained unchanged for decades. Apoptosis is a highly regulated process critical for embryonic development and tissue and organ homeostasis. Like other types of cancers, RMS develops by evading intrinsic apoptosis via mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix
    United States International Trade Commission Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix USITC Publication 4208 December 2010 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement Changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix Publication 4208 December 2010 (This page is intentionally blank) Pursuant to the letter of request from the United States Trade Representative of December 15, 2010, set forth at the end of this publication, and pursuant to section 1207(a) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act, the United States International Trade Commission is publishing the following modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) to implement changes to the Pharmaceutical Appendix, effective on January 1, 2011. Table 1 International Nonproprietary Name (INN) products proposed for addition to the Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule INN CAS Number Abagovomab 792921-10-9 Aclidinium Bromide 320345-99-1 Aderbasib 791828-58-5 Adipiplon 840486-93-3 Adoprazine 222551-17-9 Afimoxifene 68392-35-8 Aflibercept 862111-32-8 Agatolimod
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanibirumab (CUI C3490677) Add to Cart
    5/17/2018 NCI Metathesaurus Contains Exact Match Begins With Name Code Property Relationship Source ALL Advanced Search NCIm Version: 201706 Version 2.8 (using LexEVS 6.5) Home | NCIt Hierarchy | Sources | Help Suggest changes to this concept Tanibirumab (CUI C3490677) Add to Cart Table of Contents Terms & Properties Synonym Details Relationships By Source Terms & Properties Concept Unique Identifier (CUI): C3490677 NCI Thesaurus Code: C102877 (see NCI Thesaurus info) Semantic Type: Immunologic Factor Semantic Type: Amino Acid, Peptide, or Protein Semantic Type: Pharmacologic Substance NCIt Definition: A fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with potential antiangiogenic activity. Upon administration, tanibirumab specifically binds to VEGFR2, thereby preventing the binding of its ligand VEGF. This may result in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and a decrease in tumor nutrient supply. VEGFR2 is a pro-angiogenic growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase expressed by endothelial cells, while VEGF is overexpressed in many tumors and is correlated to tumor progression. PDQ Definition: A fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with potential antiangiogenic activity. Upon administration, tanibirumab specifically binds to VEGFR2, thereby preventing the binding of its ligand VEGF. This may result in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and a decrease in tumor nutrient supply. VEGFR2 is a pro-angiogenic growth factor receptor
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,161,992 B2 Jefferies Et Al
    US009 161992B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,161,992 B2 Jefferies et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 20, 2015 (54) P97 FRAGMENTS WITH TRANSFER 4,683.202 A 7, 1987 Mullis ACTIVITY 4,704,362 A 11/1987 Itakura et al. 4,766,075 A 8, 1988 Goeddeletal. (71) Applicant: biosis Technologies, Inc., Richmond 4,800,1594,784.950 A 11/19881/1989 MullisHagen et al. (CA) 4,801,542 A 1/1989 Murray et al. 4.866,042 A 9, 1989 Neuwelt (72) Inventors: Wilfred Jefferies, South Surrey (CA); 4,935,349 A 6/1990 McKnight et al. Mei Mei Tian, Coquitlam (CA): 4.946,778 A 8, 1990 Ladner et al. Timothy Vitalis, Vancouver (CA) 5,091,513 A 2f1992 Huston et al. 5,132,405 A 7, 1992 Huston et al. (73) Assignee: biOasis Technologies, Inc., British 5, 186,941 A 2f1993 Callahan et al. Columbia (CA) 5,672,683 A 9, 1997 Friden et al. 5,677,171 A 10, 1997 Hudziak et al. c - r 5,720,937 A 2f1998 Hudziak et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,720,954. A 2f1998 Hudziak et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,725,856 A 3, 1998 Hudziak et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,770,195 A 6/1998 Hudziak et al. 5,772,997 A 6/1998 Hudziak et al. (21) Appl. No.: 14/226,506 5,844,093 A 12/1998 Kettleborough et al. 5,962,012 A 10, 1999 Lin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration Toward Safety Guidance for Targeted Alpha Therapy in Japan
    TAT-11, Ottawa Consideration toward Safety Guidance for Targeted Alpha Therapy in Japan Tsuneo YANO1), Koki HASEGAWA2), Tatsuhiko SATO3),1) Akiko HACHISUKA4), Koichi FUKASE5), Yoko HIRABAYASHI6) April 2nd, 2019 1) QiSS-Targeted Alpha Therapy Research, Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University 2) Center for Instrumental Analysis, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University 3) Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency 4) Division of Biochemistry, National Institute of Health Sciences 5) Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University 6) Center for Biological Safety & Research, National Institute of Health Sciences TAT-11, Ottawa Preclinical Safety Evaluation 1) to identify an initial safe dose and subsequent dose escalation scheme in human 2) to identify potential target organs for toxicity and to examine whether such toxicity is reversible 3) to identify safety parameters for clinical monitoring We focused on both astatine 211At and actinium 225Ac as the alpha-emitters. We also discuss on initial human-dose and dose escalation, organ identification to suspect toxicity and evaluation items for monitoring upon considering physical half-lives, drug stabilities and accumulation into targeted cells. We also propose the selection method of TAT drug candidates which is satisfied with safety profile including delayed-type toxicities under our new evaluation system with histopathological examination. TAT-11, Ottawa Characteristics of Alpha Particle extremely High LET very Short Range Cell size: 10-100 mm α-particle Range: 40-90 mm Vessel β α LET: 100keV/mm Normal cells β-particle Range: 800-5000 mm LET: 0.8keV/mm Tumor cells TAT-11, Ottawa Strategy for Safety Evaluation at Preclinical Stage Problems to be solved 89Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan instead of 90Y- When stable isotope corresponding to alpha nuclide is existed, toxicity test is conducted by its labeled test compound.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy
    cancers Review Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy Laura Boyero 1 , Amparo Sánchez-Gastaldo 2, Miriam Alonso 2, 1 1,2,3, , 1,2, , José Francisco Noguera-Uclés , Sonia Molina-Pinelo * y and Reyes Bernabé-Caro * y 1 Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS) (HUVR, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla), 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (J.F.N.-U.) 2 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (A.S.-G.); [email protected] (M.A.) 3 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.M.-P.); [email protected] (R.B.-C.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Simple Summary: Immuno-oncology has redefined the treatment of lung cancer, with the ultimate goal being the reactivation of the anti-tumor immune response. This has led to the development of several therapeutic strategies focused in this direction. However, a high percentage of lung cancer patients do not respond to these therapies or their responses are transient. Here, we summarized the impact of immunotherapy on lung cancer patients in the latest clinical trials conducted on this disease. As well as the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapy in this disease. Abstract: After several decades without maintained responses or long-term survival of patients with lung cancer, novel therapies have emerged as a hopeful milestone in this research field.
    [Show full text]