DOCSLIB.ORG

Isa Does It the Vegan Cooking Queen Reigns Again

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Isa Does It the Vegan Cooking Queen Reigns Again Living passionate Com CThe Mag of MFA. LWinter 2013 ISA DOES IT THE VEGAN COOKING QUEEN REIGNS AGAIN FOIE GRAS FOES MFA’S UNDERCOVER AGENT EXPOSES THE DELICACY’S DARK SIDE WICKED WALMART + JANE INSIDE LOOK AT THE MEGA RETAILER’S PORK SUPPLIERS VELEZ-MITCHELL MEDIA MAVEN ON A MISSION SIMON SAYS TO PROTECT ANIMALS HOLLYWOOD HEAVYWEIGHT TALKS AG-GAG, VEGANISM, AND THE FUTURE producers have shown time and time again, the answer is “a lot.” From sick animals suffering from NEWS bloody open wounds and infections, to workers WATCH viciously beating animals—every time we point our cameras at a factory farm or slaughterhouse, we find appalling abuses. Compassionate Living For over a decade, the work of MFA’s brave VEGANISM: investigators has led to landmark corporate THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH animal welfare policy reforms, new and improved Randyproducers Spronk have is theshown president time and of time the again, the And while Americans shouldn’t hold their ContributorsCL 1 4 Dear Friends, laws to protect farmed animals and the Veganism Nationalanswer isPork “a lot.”Producers From sick Council—a animals suffering front frombreath for people like Mr. Spronk to make environment, felony convictions of animal abusers, Vandhana BalaNEWSWATCH bloody open wounds and infections, to workers Hollywood celebrities, from Portia de Rossi to GOES group for factoryIt’s been farmers said that acrosssocial justice the movementscountry. change,increased they consumer should protectionexpect more and food from safety Amy Bradley VIRAL viciously beating animals—every time we point Alicia Silverstone, credit their plant-based diets Mr. Spronk spendsgo through most four distinctof his stagestime pimpingbefore gaining corporationsinitiatives, and that the have closure the of particularlypower, and corrupt ethical Eddie Garza our cameraswidespread at a factory acceptance: farm or first slaughterhouse, they ignore you, facilities. Without undercover investigations, there Nora Kramer with keeping them young. And science backs pork. This is a man who will say and do responsibility, to demand better lives for From Chipotle’s vegan-positive we find appallingthen they ridiculeabuses. you, then they fight you, and are oftentimes no effective watchdogs protecting Erik Marcus them up. A University of California study found Compassionate Living “The Scarecrow” video, which anything to thensell youmore win. meat, including farmedanimals animals. from egregious Walmart, cruelty for in example, these facilities, sells Ginnie Maurer that vegetarianism might actually reverse the defending horrific and systematic cruelty to porkor from the public pigs fromwho serious start healththeir violations.wretched lives Brooke Mays aging process, and a Loma Linda University garnered millions of views For over a Well,decade, consider the the work fight of on.MFA’s brave Julie Rothman VEGANISM: animals. at Mr. Spronk’s factory farm. Walmart could, study revealed that vegetarians had a lower on YouTube within hours of investigators has led to landmark corporate So what do these ag-gag bills really mean? They Nathan Runkle risk of developing high blood pressure, After years of advocating on behalf of farmed mean we’re winning. They show that factory THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH uploading, to satellite photos of animal welfare policy reforms, new and improved and should, demand changes. In this issue, Anya Todd diabetes and heart disease, leading to animals—carrying out grassroots education events farmersContributors knowC their cruel operationsL can’t stand Kenny1 Torrella 4 Dear Friends, In lawsthis toissue protect of CL, farmed you will animals get aand no-holds- the you will read about our ongoing campaign to longer, healthier lives. Veganismfactory farms and manure lagoons and going undercover to expose cruelty at factory the spotlight. Confining animals in tiny filthy cages Sarah Von Alt barredenvironment, look farms—itinside felony Mr. seems convictions Spronk’s as if animal very of advocates animal own abusers, have finallyget thewhere world’sVandhana they can’t largest Balaeven turn retailer around, to mutilating do just that. on Reddit and The Huffington Hollywood celebrities, from Portia de Rossi to GOES It’s been said that social justice movements pigincreased factory farm,consumerfound theircourtesy voice protection in of the a mainstream.shocking and food Andnew safety that baby Amyanimals Bradley without painkillers, and mercilessly Post, to MFA’s VIRAL own Why Love go through four distinct stages before gaining initiatives, voiceand theis proving closure to beof quiteparticularly powerful. corrupt So powerful, slittingEddie the throats Garza of conscious animals are Alicia Silverstone, credit their plant-based diets Mercy For Animalsin fact, that undercover the meat, egg, investigation. and dairy industries This practicesissue—which grossly outsports of step a withfresh the new values of One but Eat the Other? tour widespread acceptance: first they ignore you, facilities. Without undercover investigations, there Nora Kramer with keeping them young. And science backs You will readare about now fighting the miserable back in the livesform of dangerous look—alsomost Americans contains today. uplifting interviews, From Chipotle’sfeatured vegan-positive on the wildly popular then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and are oftentimes no effective watchdogs protecting Erik Marcus them up. A University of California study found to which thousandslaws that seek of motherto silence pigswhistleblowers are on factorymouthwatering vegan recipes, health tips, THE BuzzFeed, veganism is taking then you win. animals fromfarms, egregious making criminals cruelty out in ofthese individuals facilities, who To theGinnie chagrin Maurer of big ag, the animal protection that vegetarianism might actually reverse the “The Scarecrow” video, which condemned at this Minnesota hellhole. and inspiring activist profiles. You will meet or the publicdare from to do serious the unthinkable: health violations.take photographs. movementBrooke has Mays already picked up traction and aging process, and a Loma Linda University FUTURE OF garnered millionsover the of online views world. You will hear about the standard abuses: Joshmomentum Garret, who that willhiked only overbuild over2,600 time. miles No to Well, consider the fight on. Julie Rothman The newest trend in animal agribusiness isn’t amount of oppressive legislation can stop an idea study revealed that vegetarians had a lower on YouTube within hours of motherSo what pigs do lockedthese ag-gag in crates bills barely really largermean? They raise awarenessNathan Runkle about the plight of farmed 2 volunteering to improve conditions for animals, whose time has come. risk of developing high blood pressure, After years of advocating on behalf of farmed thanmean their we’re bodies; winning. baby They animals show mutilatedthat factory animals. You will also meet activists of all uploading, to satellite photos of or working to weed out animal abusers by Anya Todd diabetes and heart disease, leading to animals—carrying out grassroots education events withoutfarmers painkillers; knowsupporting their andcruel increased the operations bodies oversight ofcan’t or dead strengthening stand ages and backgrounds from across the Kenny Torrella longer, healthier lives. factory farms and manure lagoons and going undercover to expose cruelty at factory animalsthe spotlight. litteringour nation’sConfining walkways. abysmal animals You animal will in cruelty alsotiny laws. filthyread No, cages thecountry Sincerely, whoSarah have Von Alt found their unique voices, Mercy For Animals is a national farms—it seems as if animal advocates have finally where theynewest can’t trendeven in turn the industryaround, is mutilatingto aggressively non-profit organization FOOD on Reddit and The Huffington about the nearlylobby fordaily so-called beatings “ag-gag” that bills, animals which aim to skills, and talents and put them to use found their voice in the mainstream. And that baby animals without painkillers, and mercilessly dedicated to preventing cruelty endured at themake hands it a criminal of workers offense—in who some grew cases a felonybringing about change on behalf of animals. to farmed animals and promoting Post, to MFA’s own Why Love voice is proving to be quite powerful. So powerful, slitting the throats of conscious animals are desensitizedwith to thethe same needs punishment of the asanimals assaulting a police compassionate food choices and When Bill Gates proclaims, Nathanin fact, Runkle that the meat, egg, and dairy industries practices grosslyofficer—to out simplyof step expose with crueltythe values to animals of at One but Eat the Other? tour whose care was entrusted to them. As you read the pages that follow, I hope it policies. Executiveare now fightingDirector back in the form of dangerous most Americansfactory farmstoday. and slaughterhouses. Ten states “The meat market is ripe for featured on the wildly popular recently proposed these outrageous laws, and will inspire and empower youNathan in your Runkle journey Given that over 97% of animal laws that seek to silence whistleblowers on factory reinvention,” you know there 7.3 Million VIEWS two had the gall to pass them: Iowa and Utah. Executive Director THE BuzzFeed, veganism is taking farms, making criminals out of individuals who AfterTo the we chagrin released of ourbig ag,investigation the animal atprotection Mr. of making the world a kinder place for cruelty occurs in the production of meat, dairy, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal of Animal Law Received Generous Support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL LAW Michigan State University College of Law APRIL 2009 Volume V J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W Vol. V 2009 EDITORIAL BOARD 2008-2009 Editor-in-Chief ANN A BA UMGR A S Managing Editor JENNIFER BUNKER Articles Editor RA CHEL KRISTOL Executive Editor BRITT A NY PEET Notes & Comments Editor JA NE LI Business Editor MEREDITH SH A R P Associate Editors Tabb Y MCLA IN AKISH A TOWNSEND KA TE KUNK A MA RI A GL A NCY ERIC A ARMSTRONG Faculty Advisor DA VID FA VRE J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W Vol. V 2009 Pee R RE VI E W COMMITT ee 2008-2009 TA IMIE L. BRY A NT DA VID CA SSUTO DA VID FA VRE , CH A IR RE B ECC A J. HUSS PETER SA NKOFF STEVEN M. WISE The Journal of Animal Law received generous support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law. Without their generous support, the Journal would not have been able to publish and host its second speaker series. The Journal also is funded by subscription revenues. Subscription requests and article submissions may be sent to: Professor Favre, Journal of Animal Law, Michigan State University College of Law, 368 Law College Building, East Lansing MI 48824. The Journal of Animal Law is published annually by law students at ABA accredited law schools. Membership is open to any law student attending an ABA accredited law college.
    [Show full text]
  • Memetic Proliferation and Fan Participation in the Simpsons
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Craptacular Science and the Worst Audience Ever: Memetic Proliferation and Fan Participation in The Simpsons being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of PhD Film Studies in the University of Hull by Jemma Diane Gilboy, BFA, BA (Hons) (University of Regina), MScRes (University of Edinburgh) April 2016 Craptacular Science and the Worst Audience Ever: Memetic Proliferation and Fan Participation in The Simpsons by Jemma D. Gilboy University of Hull 201108684 Abstract (Thesis Summary) The objective of this thesis is to establish meme theory as an analytical paradigm within the fields of screen and fan studies. Meme theory is an emerging framework founded upon the broad concept of a “meme”, a unit of culture that, if successful, proliferates among a given group of people. Created as a cultural analogue to genetics, memetics has developed into a cultural theory and, as the concept of memes is increasingly applied to online behaviours and activities, its relevance to the area of media studies materialises. The landscapes of media production and spectatorship are in constant fluctuation in response to rapid technological progress. The internet provides global citizens with unprecedented access to media texts (and their producers), information, and other individuals and collectives who share similar knowledge and interests. The unprecedented speed with (and extent to) which information and media content spread among individuals and communities warrants the consideration of a modern analytical paradigm that can accommodate and keep up with developments. Meme theory fills this gap as it is compatible with existing frameworks and offers researchers a new perspective on the factors driving the popularity and spread (or lack of popular engagement with) a given media text and its audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonny Haseng
    M2100 Westmoreland Street. ,Falls Church, V,irginia2O43: .: 703/532-22I 7 January 2000 Number I Schedule of January Coming In February.... Shabbat Services Shabbat Shemot December 31/January 1 Exodus 1:1-6:1 Shabbat Evening Service 0 6:30 pm Shabbat Vaera - January 7/8 Exodus 6:2-9:35 Family Shabbat with SATURDAY Guest Storyteller 4th Grade sings FEBRUARI 7:30 pm Shabbat Parallel Morning Minyan 5TH 10:15 am TWO ENIQUE Morning Service - 10:30 am Bat Mitzvah of Alida Frey EVENTS WITH Shabbat Bo - January 14/15 Exodus 10:1-13:16 JEWISH ARTIST Federation Shabbat Service 8:15 pm Morning Service - 10:30 am Bat Mitzvah of Robbie Rogart BONNY HASENG Shabbat Shira January 21-22 10:15 AM 8 PM Exodus 13:17-17:16 Shabbal MornIng/lunch & Learn llaulalah Program Tot Shabbat - 6:30 pm The Eyes of Leah: A Kabbalistic Journey to Wasting Time With Harry Davidowitz: Shabbat Evening Service-8:15 pm Funded by the Loeb Cultural Fund Morning Service - 10:30 am the Inner Beauty of Torah Bnot Mitzvah of Share Shabbat with Donny at the Take the musical journey of a Alissa Kur & Caroline Berson Parallel Morning Minyan and lifetime through the eyes of this Shabbat Yitro learn about Kabbalah. Discover awesome performer, in his one- January 28-29 the inner meaning of Torah man show for congregants and Exodus 18:1-20:23 passages. Experience the gift of guests ages 13 and over. We will be Brotherhood Shabbat Service - our mystical teachings through whisked away on a roller coaster 8:15 pm music, stories and Torah com- ride through a musical journey of a Morning Service - 10:30 am Bar Mitzvah of Daniel Direnfeld mentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Id, the Ego and the Superego of the Simpsons
    Hugvísindasvið The Id, the Ego and the Superego of The Simpsons B.A. Essay Stefán Birgir Stefánsson January 2013 University of Iceland School of Humanities Department of English The Id, the Ego and the Superego of The Simpsons B.A. Essay Stefán Birgir Stefánsson Kt.: 090285-2119 Supervisor: Anna Heiða Pálsdóttir January 2013 Abstract The purpose of this essay is to explore three main characters from the popular television series The Simpsons in regards to Sigmund Freud‟s theories in psychoanalytical analysis. This exploration is done because of great interest by the author and the lack of psychoanalytical analysis found connected to The Simpsons television show. The main aim is to show that these three characters, Homer Simpson, Marge Simpson and Ned Flanders, represent Freud‟s three parts of the psyche, the id, the ego and the superego, respectively. Other Freudian terms and ideas are also discussed. Those include: the reality principle, the pleasure principle, anxiety, repression and aggression. For this analysis English translations of Sigmund Freud‟s original texts and other written sources, including psychology textbooks, and a selection of The Simpsons episodes, are used. The character study is split into three chapters, one for each character. The first chapter, which is about Homer Simpson and his controlling id, his oral character, the Oedipus complex and his relationship with his parents, is the longest due to the subchapter on the relationship between him and Marge, the id and the ego. The second chapter is on Marge Simpson, her phobia, anxiety, aggression and repression. In the third and last chapter, Ned Flanders and his superego is studied, mainly through the religious aspect of the character.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Simpson Versus Trump
    LOS SIMPSON VERSUS TRUMP Graciela Martínez-Zalce Sánchez* Para GAH, quien no conocía a los Simpson y cree conocer a Trump And that is how I became a Democrat HOMERO J. SIMPSON El corto titulado “Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office”,1 publicado el 26 de abril de 2017 como parte de la temporada 28 de Los Simpson en el canal Animation Fox en Youtube, cierra con un negro sarcasmo.2 En una serie, en la que por casi tres décadas se han utilizado los matices y las sutilezas indis- pensables para que los episodios, escritos con gran inteligencia por presti- giosos grupos de guionistas irreverentes,3 tengan como característica sobresaliente tres figuras retóricas, la parodia, la ironía y, sobre todo, la sátira, * Directora e investigadora del Centro de Investigaciones sobre América del Norte de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, <[email protected]>. 1 En este artículo utilizaré los títulos de los capítulos y los nombres que se le han dado a los per- sonajes en español en el doblaje para México (donde la serie comenzó a transmitirse en el canal 13 de Imevisión en marzo de 1991, los martes a las 20:30 horas), pero, en su mayoría, las citas textuales de los diálogos se harán en el original en inglés debido a que el doblaje tropicaliza las alusiones y, por tratarse aquí de los partidos y los políticos estadunidenses, es importante que se conserven. En el caso específico de este corto, puesto que no fue exhibido fuera de Estados Unidos y Canadá, y como la wiki en español aún está consignando la temporada 27, el título del mismo se anota en inglés.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Power for Animals COVER STORY
    A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY 2010 | Number 2 AVmagazine Consumer Power COVER STORY for Animals PRODUCT TESTING: BEGINNING TO AN END? pg 4 2010 Number 2 Consumer Power for Animals 8 FEATURES PRODUCT TESTING: 4Beginning to an End? Where we’ve been. Where we are. Where we’re going. 16 By Crystal Schaeffer 8 The Leaping Bunny Program While other compassionate shopping lists exist, only the Leaping Bunny can assure certified companies are truly cruelty-free. By Vicki Katrinak 12 What’s Cruelty-Free? Reading labels can be difficult, but looking for the Leaping Bunny Logo is easy. By Vicki Katrinak DEPARTMENTS 14 Tom’s of Maine: A Brush Above the Rest Putting ideals into action, Tom’s challenged FDA, and in a precedent-setting decision, 1 First Word was permitted to use a non-animal alternative to test its fluoride toothpaste. Consumers can and do make a difference for animals. 16 Reducing Animal Testing Alternatives development is making great strides, especially in the areas of skin and eye 2 News safety testing. Update on Great Apes; Congress Acts to By Rodger Curren Crush Cruel Videos; Bias in Animal Studies. 24 AAVS Action 20 Product Testing: The Struggle in Europe Animal testing bans mean progress, but not paradise, in Europe. $30,000 awarded for education alternatives; Humane Student and Educator Awards; and By Michelle Thew Leaping Bunny’s high standards. 22 Laws and Animal Testing 26 Giving PRESIDENT’S REPORT: An interview with Sue Leary points out the influences that For now and into the future, supporting can help—or harm—animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics
    Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Ox2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York Translation, Note on the Text and Translation, Select Bibliography, Chronology, Explanatory Notes © David E. Cartwright and Edward E. Erdmann 2010 Introduction © Christopher Janaway 2010 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published as an Oxford World’s Classics paperback 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above
    [Show full text]
  • Different Perspectives on Animal Rights Melissa L
    DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES ON ANIMAL RIGHTS MELISSA L. LYONS DEPARTMENT OF IDS MADONNA UNIVERSITY Sponsored by EDIE WOODS([email protected]) ABSTRACT This paper will address the issue of animal rights from the perspective of six different disciplines, including biology, ethics, history, law, physiological psychology and religion. Each of these disciplines’ attempts to address questions relating to animal rights will be presented. Then, using an interdisciplinary approach, the information will be integrated in an attempt to generate new answers to questions about animal rights. INTRODUCTION Just as there are millions of animals on our planet, there are millions of views and opinions regarding animal rights. Ask a doctor his feelings regarding this subject and you may get a different answer than if you asked a priest or a lawyer. Ask someone living in America their views on animal rights and you may get a different answer than if you asked someone living in India. Animal rights are a debate that is steeped in controversy because it touches every aspect of society. The implications go beyond most imaginations. Today animals are afforded certain protections under the law. These protections include food, water and a safe environment in which to live free from undue pain and suffering. Many would like to see these animal protections taken further by giving animals their own rights, rights that may include the ability to sue in a court of law, or the right to not undergo medical procedures for animal experimentation. Giving animals rights is controversial because it would require society to stop using and treating animals in certain ways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Disparity in Protection Between Companion Animals and Agricultural Animals Elizabeth Ann Overcash
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 90 | Number 3 Article 7 3-1-2012 Unwarranted Discrepancies in the Advancement of Animal Law:? The Growing Disparity in Protection between Companion Animals and Agricultural Animals Elizabeth Ann Overcash Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Elizabeth A. Overcash, Unwarranted Discrepancies in the Advancement of Animal Law:? The Growing Disparity in Protection between Companion Animals and Agricultural Animals, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 837 (2012). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol90/iss3/7 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNWARRANTED DISCREPANCIES IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF ANIMAL LAW: THE GROWING DISPARITY IN PROTECTION BETWEEN COMPANION ANIMALS AND AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS* INTRO D U CT IO N ....................................................................................... 837 I. SU SIE'S LA W .................................................................................. 839 II. PROGRESSION OF LAWS OVER TIME ......................................... 841 A . Colonial L aw ......................................................................... 842 B . The B ergh E ra........................................................................ 846 C. Modern Cases........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2007 Volume 26 Number 1 INSIDE: Swift Rescue for Neglected Dogs See Page 3
    Spring 2007 Volume 26 Number 1 INSIDE: Swift Rescue for Neglected Dogs See Page 3 A NEWSLETTER FOR SUPPORTERS OF THE ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND Victory for Abused Chimpanzees ALDF settles suit against Hollywood “trainer” o the attorneys at ALDF, it was a clear case of cruelty for profit, but it’s final- ly over. Angel, Cody, and Sable – three chimpanzees who for years were Texploited and abused by a Hollywood animal “trainer” – are beginning the new year, and their new lives, in sanctuaries for rescued primates. After one of ALDF’s most important and hard- est-fought legal battles, Cody and Sable are enjoy- ing the loving atmosphere of Save the Chimps in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Established in 1997, Save the Chimps is a non-profit organization that will offer Cody and Sable a comfortable setting among fellow chimpanzees who have been rescued from the space program, laboratory research, and other sources. The environment of Save the Chimps was carefully designed to nurture and stimulate these sensitive and complex primates, providing them with a home in which to socialize, build bonds, play, and rebuild the confidence that has been destroyed by years of physical and emo- tional abuse. Moreover, they are at long last being treated with the love they deserve, enjoying not appearances under the threat of physical punish- Sable—free at last—at only excellent healthcare, but three meals a day of ment. Since 1993, the non-profit Center for her new home with fresh fruits and vegetables, oatmeal or grits in the Great Apes has been providing long-term care for Save the Chimps morning, and a dinner of pasta salad.
    [Show full text]
  • May 4, 2020 Honourable Bill Morneau Honourable Marie
    May 4, 2020 Honourable Bill Morneau Honourable Marie-Claude Bibeau Minister of Finance Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food 90 Elgin St. 1341 Baseline Road Tower 7, Floor 9, Room 149 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C5 Dear Ministers, Re: Animal agriculture industry requests for financial aid On behalf of Animal Justice, Mercy for Animals, and the Canadian Coalition for Farm Animals, we are writing in response to reports that the Canadian Pork Council is seeking approximately $500 million dollars in public funds to compensate for lost revenues in the pig farming industry caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Canadian Cattlemen’s Association is pushing for government programs aimed at helping the cow farming industry with the costs of feeding cows for longer periods of time and compensating producers for financial losses. Canada faces unprecedented public health challenges due to the outbreak of COVID-19. The pandemic is also taking a significant economic toll on individual Canadians, businesses, and not- for-profit groups such as ours. In the animal agriculture industry, challenges due to the COVID- 19 pandemic pose serious risks to animal welfare, including risks of staff layoffs and an inability to maintain animal care practices, confined living conditions that are even more overcrowded than they were previously, inadequate feed and veterinary supplies, animals being transported greater distances to slaughter, and animals being killed through what is known as “mass depopulation” or “culling”. Public funds should not be used to support factory farms, which are known for subjecting animals to cruelty, providing dangerous and precarious working conditions for workers, damaging the natural environment, and causing outbreaks of foodborne illnesses and viral infections.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Moral Vegetarianism
    A CRITIQUE OF MORAL VEGETARIANISM Michael Martin Boston University EGETARIANISM is an old and respectable doctrine, and V its popularity seems to be growing.' This would be of little interest to moral philosophers except for one fact, namely that some people advocate vegetarianism on moral grounds. Indeed, two well-known moral and social philoso- phers, Robert Nozick and Peter Singer, have recently advocated not eating meat on moral grounds.2 One job of a moral philosophy should be to evaluate vegetarianism as a moral position, a position P will call moral vegetarianism. Unfortunately, there has been little critical evaluation of moral vegetarianism in the philo- sophicai iiterature. Most morai philosophers have not been concerned with the problem, and those who have, e.g., Nozick, have made little attempt to analyze and evaluate the position. As a result, important problems implicit in the moral vegetarian's position have gone unnoticed, and unsound arguments are still widely accepted. In this paper, I will critically examine moral vegetarian- ism. My examination will not be complete, of course. Some of the arguments I will present are not worked out in detail, and no detailed criticisms of any one provegetarian argument will be given. All the major provegetarian arguments I know will be critically considered, however. My examination will be divided into two parts. First, I will raise some questions that usually are not asked, let alone answered, by moral vegetarians. These questions will have the effect of forcing the moral vegetarian to come to grips with some ambiguities and unclarities in his position. Second, I will consider critically some of the major arguments given for moral vegetarianism.
    [Show full text]