פלוני היינו תנא קמא the Evolution of a Talmudic Formula
Oqimta 6 (2020) [83-122] פלוני היינו תנא קמא - איכא בינייהו The Evolution of a Talmudic Formula Shana Strauch Schick One of the most common strategies for differentiating between the different layers in the Babylonian Talmud is distinguishing between attributed statements and the anonymous editorial layer of the Bavli’s redactors.1 Aside from being anonymous, the redactional material is * I would like to thank the editors, Michal Bar-Asher Siegal and Moulie Vidas, for their encouragement and comments, as well as the anonymous reviewer who provided vital feedback. Yaakov Elman, z”l, read an earlier version of this paper and provided valuable insights and Zvi Arieh Steinfeld, z”l discussed several of the sugyot with me. This article is dedicated to the memory of Rabbi Dr. Meir (Manfred) Fulda z”l, whose dissertation, completed in 1979 at Yeshiva University, on the very same talmudic phrase, came to my attention thanks to the comments of the aforementioned reviewer. His study, conducted without the aid of modern computers and search engines, serves as a testament to his vast erudition and diligence as a scholar. 1 The most influential accounts of this methodology in American scholarship were delineated by Shamma Friedman, “A Critical Study of Yevamot X with a Methodological Introduction,” in Mehqarim u-Meqorot: Texts and Studies, Analecta Judaica, ed. H. Dimitrovski, vol. I (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1977), 283–321; David Halivni, “Sefeqei de-Gavrei,” in Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, vol. 46–47, 1980, 67–93; David Halivni, Midrash, Mishnah, and Gemara: The Jewish Predilection for Justified Law (Harvard University Press, 1986); David Halivni, Meqorot U-Mesorot: Biʹurim Ba-Talmud Massekhet Baba Batra (Jerusalem: Magnes, 2007), 1–147.
[Show full text]