DOCSLIB.ORG

US Anti-Iran Hostility Ramps up Under Trump Administration Page 2 |No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Anti-Iran Hostility Ramps up Under Trump Administration Page 2 |No Page 1 |No. 13|May 2019 Mehr Vision|No.13|May 2019 MEHR NEWSAGENCY US anti-Iran hostility ramps up under Trump Administration Page 2 |No. 13|May 2019 MEHR NEWSAGENCY Contents Trump’s decision on IRGC has nothing to do with international law 3 US move to bludgeon Iran into submission to US demands may boomerang 3 Brandishing IRGC as terrorist group an act of terror itself 4 Cover Story Cover Sanctions aimed at bringing Iran to negotiating table with US 4 What are main aims of Imran khan’s Iran visit? 6 New government formation inWest Bank is great betrayal 7 S Arabia would be different if it faced consequences for its actions 8 Execution of 37 Saudi citizens a major crime 9 S. Arabia has not really demonstrated nuclear transparency 10 Ansarollah not to allow aggressors’ control over Al-Hudaydah 11 Assad’s visit to Tehran sign of unwavering Syrian-Iran ties 12 Politics Transferring nuclear technology to al-Saud is the most destabilizing development 13 US wants to make Venezuela another Syria or Libya: ambassador 14 Iran may be gearing up to reduce nuclear coop. under JCPOA 15 S Africa, Iran to ‘weather the storm together’: amb. Khumalo 16 EGFI to issue guarantees for oil purchasers of IRENEX 18 Impossible to drive Iran’s oil export to zero 20 TSE official uncovers reasons for stocks boom 21 World financial bodies, tools for imposing US policies 22 Mehr Vision Economy IME suitable platform of economic prosperity 25 Managing Director: Ali Asgari Editorial Board: How Trump’s oil plans backfire on him 29 Seyed Amir Hassan Dehghani, Mohammad Ghaderi, Assad’s message while in Tehran 30 Payman Yazdani, Majid Rafiee Op-ed Macron at political deadlock 31 Editorial Coordinator: Marjohn Sheikhi The ‘Verve’ of melancholy; “It’s just a feeling I carry inside” 34 Contributors: Payman Yazdani, Mohammad Ghaderi, Iran tourism sector thriving despite US sanctions 36 Marjohn Sheikhi, Mohammad Ali Culture Success in artificial insemination in Persian leopards may raise hopes for rare big cats 37 Haqshenas, Haniyeh Sadat Jafariyeh, Morteza Rahmani, Lachin Rezaian, Kamal Iranidoost, Hanif Ghaffari, Javad Heirannia, Zahra Mirzafarjouyan Tehran begins playing host to over 100 films at 37th FIFF 40 Art Director: Mahboubeh Azizi ‘Do not go gentle into that good night’;FIFF celebrates free, fighting spirits 41 2019 Fajr Intl. Filmfest. names winners; ‘A Russian Youth’ wins grand prix 46 Phone: +98-21-43051350 Dossier Email: [email protected] Fajr Intl. Film Festival gives you a cinema of all flavors 47 Address: No. 18, Bimeh Alley, Nejatollahi St., Tehran, Iran Perspolis main goal is to qualify for next stage at AFC Champion League, coach says 49 Mehr Vision welcomes contributions by What are Carlos Queiroz legacies in Iranian football? 50 readers which can be sent via email. Sport Major achievements of Iranian athletes in the past year 51 Cover Story Page 3 |No. 13|May 2019 MEHR NEWSAGENCY Trump’s decision on IRGC has nothing to do with international law: Prof. Zonis Interview by Payman Yazdani ignate the IRGC as a terrorist group and the reasons behind his unprece- Professor of international political dented move, he said, “The US Presi- economy in the University of Chicago dent’s decision is based on the advice believes Trump’s move against the IRGC he has been receiving from his hard- is based on the advice of his evangelical line advisers — most especially from supporters and hardline advisers. John Bolton. Bolton seeks the over- throw of the clerical establishment The White House’s increasingly and the new sanctions are meant to aggressive approaches towards Iran diminish the business success that the came to a head as the administration IRGC has enjoyed.” of US President Donald Trump desig- He went on to add, “The decision is nated the Islamic Revolution Guards also a communication to his evangelical Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist or- supporters who seek a powerful Israel decision on the IRGC. ganization through an official state- to prepare for the return of the Christ. Touching upon the consequences of ment. It is also a communication to Israel and the White House’s move and its effects In light of this development, we Saudi Arabia that the US remains an en- on the security and stability of the re- reached out to Marvin Zonis, Professor emy of their enemy. It has nothing to do gion he noted, “Iran is left with bitter of international political economy and with international law.” choices. It may take steps that would leadership in the University of Chicago. Zonis also emphasized that the re- provoke Trump to retaliate with the real Commenting on the legitimacy of flection of Trump in 2020 US presiden- possibility of an escalation to a shooting the President Trump’s decision to des- tial election is another reason behind his war.” US move to bludgeon Iran into submission to US demands may boomerang: Entessar Interview by Payman Yazdani chestrated by certain elements of the Trump administration to appease the Following US’ recent hostile move neocon thirst for forceful, American-in- against the IRGC Nader Entessar says duced regime change.” there is nothing more the US can gain He referred to unprecedented illegal by its most recent decision that it has move of Trump and said, “This is the not already achieved. first time in the history of international relations when the government of one The United States’ increasingly ag- nation-state single-handedly has desig- gressive approaches towards Iran came nated a military segment of another rec- to a head last night as the administration of US President Don- ognized nation-state as a terrorist organization.” ald Trump designated the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps He called the possible consequences of the White House (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization through an official decision “dangerous” and said, “This is a move with many statement. dangerous consequences. Iran’s Supreme National Secu- In light of this development, Mehr News Agency reached rity Council has already reciprocated the latest US moves to Nader Entessar, professor emeritus of political science from against Iran by issuing a statement declaring the US Central university of South Alabama. Command (CENTCOM) and forces under its command in Commenting on the effects of the Trump’s move on the Southwest Asia as terrorist entities. Such tit-for-tat moves IRGC, he said, “The IRGC has been under complete US sanc- may indeed generate uncontrollable spiraling consequenc- tions regime for some time now. Therefore, there is nothing es. More specifically, Trump’s latest move, which is intend- more the US can gain by its most recent decision that it has ed to bludgeon Iran into submission to US demands, may not already achieved. This is generally a political move or- boomerang.” Cover Story Page 4 |No. 13|May 2019 MEHR NEWSAGENCY Turkish politician: Brandishing IRGC as terrorist group an act of terror itself Interview by: Payman Yazdani Iran, declaring, in turn, the US armed forces a terrorist organization.” In an interview with MNA following He went on to add, “the broader dan- US’ recent hostile move against the ger is that these reciprocal and coun- Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, a ter-productive steps will only escalate senior member of Turkey’s Republican tensions in the MENA and Persian Gulf, People’s Party (CHP), Faruk logoglu, and vastly raise the chances of armed said “brandishing IRGC as a terrorist encounters between the two sides.” group is essentially an act of terror Any such event, he went on to note, itself.” “if and when it occurs, would be ex- tremely difficult to keep from leading to The United States’ increasingly ag- a wider military confrontation between gressive approaches towards Iran came the two adversaries.” to a head last night as the administration “This US move on IRGC follows in the of US President Donald Trump designat- is supposedly designed to increase the footsteps of President Trump’s decisions ed the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps pressure on Iran and opens a new fron- on Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, all (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization tier beyond the realm of economic sanc- presumably serving Israeli interests just through an official statement. tions.” as much as American interests,” said In light of this development, Mehr “Trump continues to stoke the fires Logoglu, adding, however, that “this is News Agency reached to a senior mem- of tension and conflict in the region,” a misconception because all three steps ber of Turkey’s Republican People’s the Turkish diplomat stressed, adding potentially pave the way for new con- Party (CHP), Osman Faruk logoglu, who “this step will only serve to entrench the flicts while relegating the prospects of believes that “brandishing IRGC as a ter- determination of the Iranian people to peace and security in the region into a rorist group is essentially an act of terror resist US efforts to force Iran into sub- very distant future.” itself.” mission.” “By remaining calm and calibrated, He called the move as “unprecedent- About the consequences of this move, I believe Iran will defeat American de- ed, unlawful and devoid of any credibil- Logoglu maintained that an immediate signs and provocations to subjugate it,” ity or legitimacy,” adding that the “step one was the “reported response from he concluded. Frmr. envoy to Norway tells MNA: Sanctions aimed at bringing Iran to negotiating table with US The former Iranian ambassador to tain relations with Bahrain, the United Norway and Hungary Abdulreza Farajirad Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, but it has said that the US sanctions are aimed was unclear whether someone else in his at bringing Iran to the negotiating table place could equally match the US hardlin- with the United States once again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case #2 United States of America (Respondent)
    Model International Court of Justice (MICJ) Case #2 United States of America (Respondent) Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America) Arkansas Model United Nations (AMUN) November 20-21, 2020 Teeter 1 Historical Context For years, there has been a consistent struggle between the State of Israel and the State of Palestine led by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 2018, United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. embassy located in Tel Aviv would be moving to the city of Jerusalem.1 Palestine, angered by the embassy moving, filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018.2 The history of this case, U.S. relations with Israel and Palestine, current events, and why the ICJ should side with the United States will be covered in this research paper. Israel and Palestine have an interesting relationship between war and competition. In 1948, Israel captured the west side of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians captured the east side during the Arab-Israeli War. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. In 1949, the Lausanne Conference took place, and the UN came to the decision for “corpus separatum” which split Jerusalem into a Jewish zone and an Arab zone.3 At this time, the State of Israel decided that Jerusalem was its “eternal capital.”4 “Corpus separatum,” is a Latin term meaning “a city or region which is given a special legal and political status different from its environment, but which falls short of being sovereign, or an independent city-state.”5 1 Office of the President, 82 Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem § (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code RL33530 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Updated August 4, 2006 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Summary After the first Gulf war, in 1991, a new peace process involved bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. On September 13, 1993, Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) signed a Declaration of Principles (DOP), providing for Palestinian empowerment and some territorial control. On October 26, 1994, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and King Hussein of Jordan signed a peace treaty. Israel and the Palestinians signed an Interim Self-Rule in the West Bank or Oslo II accord on September 28, 1995, which led to the formation of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to govern the West Bank and Gaza. The Palestinians and Israelis signed additional incremental accords in 1997, 1998, and 1999. Israeli-Syrian negotiations were intermittent and difficult, and were postponed indefinitely in 2000. On May 24, 2000, Israel unilaterally withdrew from south Lebanon after unsuccessful negotiations. From July 11 to 24, 2000, President Clinton held a summit with Israeli and Palestinian leaders at Camp David on final status issues, but they did not produce an accord. A Palestinian uprising or intifadah began that September. On February 6, 2001, Ariel Sharon was elected Prime Minister of Israel, and rejected steps taken at Camp David and afterwards. The post 9/11 war on terrorism prompted renewed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Likud and the Oslo Process: Implications of a Hebron Accord
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 114 Likud and the Oslo Process: Implications of a Hebron Accord Jan 3, 1997 Brief Analysis f negotiators overcome eleventh-hour Palestinian demands and conclude an agreement on Hebron I redeployment, this accord would mark a milestone in the Middle East peace process: the first signed agreement between a Likud government and the Palestinians. With significant U.S. encouragement, the two sides will have managed to overcome the intense acrimony and bitterness that only three months ago claimed scores of lives and took the peace process to the precipice of collapse. The nearly hundred days of haggling since the Washington Summit -- sparked by the Netanyahu government's demand for improved security arrangements for the some 400 Israeli residents of Hebron and then fueled by Arafat's desire to take advantage of global sympathy to win concessions on non-Hebron issues -- may come to be seen by future historians as a critical turning point in the peace process, i.e., the moment when the Likud abandoned elements of its core ideology for the sake of accommodation with the Palestinians. The Hebron Conundrum: Israel's redeployment in Hebron completes the implementation of IDF withdrawals from the seven major Palestinian population centers, as called for in the September 1995 PLO-Israel accord (Oslo II). For the agreement's original Israeli negotiators, Hebron was such a thorny issue that its provisions outlining IDF redeployment from the city were separate and significantly more complex than those delineating withdrawal from other cities and towns in Gaza and the West Bank. Indeed, pulling IDF troops out of four-fifths of Hebron was seen as so potentially explosive and politically costly, that the Labor government of Shimon Peres balked at fulfilling that provision of the Oslo II accord.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS General Assembly Security Council
    UNITED NATIONS AS General Assembly Distr. Security Council GENERAL A/51/889 S/1997/357 5 May 1997 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH GENERAL ASSEMBLY SECURITY COUNCIL Fifty-first session Fifty-second year Agenda item 10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE WORK OF THE ORGANIZATION Letter dated 27 December 1995 from the Permanent Representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General As co-sponsors of the peace process launched at Madrid in October 1991, and witnesses to the signing at Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995, of the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, we have the honour to enclose the above document (see annex). We would be grateful if you would have the present letter and its attachment circulated as an official document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 10, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Madeleine K. ALBRIGHT (Signed) Sergey V. LAVROV Ambassador Ambassador Permanent Representative Permanent Representative of the United States of of the Russian Federation America to the United Nations to the United Nations 230797 /... A/51/889 S/1997/357 English Page 2 Letter dated 28 December 1995 from the Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Hations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, signed at Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995, by the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization and witnessed by the United States of America, the Russian Federation, Egypt, Jordan, Norway and the European Union (see annex).
    [Show full text]
  • An Israeli-Palestinian Confederation: a Viable Alternative for the “Two States Solution”?
    An Israeli-Palestinian Confederation: A viable alternative for the “two states solution”? Friedrich Naumann STIFTUNG FÜR DIE FREIHEIT HKS 92 (grau) CMYK 10, 0, 5, 65 HKS 44 (blau) CMYK 100, 50, 0, 0 An Israeli-Palestinian Confederation: A viable alternative for the “two states solution”? Table of Contents Introductory Note Yair Hirschfeld .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 An Israeli-Palestinian Confederation: A viable alternative for the “two states solution”? Eran Etzion ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Israel and Palestine: For and Against the Idea of a Confederation Yair Hirschfeld .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 About the writers ................................................................................................................................................. 31 The repeated failure of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations during the last decades, regional unrest and destabilization throughout the Middle East have contributed to a diminished public belief and confidence in the viability of a peaceful Israel-Palestine two state solution. Through the encouragement and support of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Liberty, the S.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine Water Fact Sheet #1
    hrough e t hu ic m t a FACT SHEET s n ju r l i a g i h c t o s THE RIGHT TO WATER IN PALESTINE: A BACKGROUND s 11 C E S R he Israeli confiscation and control of LEGEND ability to manage water resources and just Palestinian water resources is a defining Groundwater flow allocates the limited supply made available by T feature of the Israeli occupation and a LEBANON Groundwater divide Israel, the PWA, rather than the Occupation, is GOLAN major impediment to a just resolution of the Israeli National Water HEIGHTS blamed for water scarcity. Moreover, the Oslo Israel-Palestine conflict. Furthermore, Israel’s Carrier Sea of II agreement does not call for redistribution of control of Palestinian water resources Armistice Demarcation Galilee Line, 1949 existing water sources nor require any undermines any possibility for sustainable Haifa Tiberias Syria-Israel Cease Fire reduction in water extraction or consumption development and violates Palestinians’ human Line, 1967 Nazareth by Israelis or settlers. right to safe, accessible, and adequate drinking Palestinian Territory Occupied by Israel (June n Jenin a water. Israel’s discriminatory water policy 1967) d r • Since 2000, after the onset of the Second o Northern J maintains an unequal allocation of water between Aquifer r e v Intifada in September, the Israeli army has Tu l k a re m i Israel, illegal Israeli settler communities and R intensified the destruction of water infrastruc- Palestinians living in the occupied Palestinian Nablus Western ture and confiscation ofwater sources in the 7 territory (oPt), while appropriating an ever greater Te l Av i v Aquifer WEST r BANK West Bank and Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Peace Accords the Oslo Peace Accords Are a Pair of Agreements Signed Between the Government of Israel and the Palestenian Liberation Organisation (PLO)
    Oslo Peace Accords The Oslo Peace Accords are a pair of agreements signed between the Government of Israel and the Palestenian Liberation Organisation (PLO). They were signed by Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat, the leader of the PLO. There were two agreements that were signed: The Oslo I Accord signed at Washington D.C in 1993 and the Oslo II Accord signed at Taba, Egypt in 1995. The accords established limited Paestenian self-rule in parts of Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The Oslo Peace Accord has been in the news lately following the announcement of the United State’s Middle East Peace Plan, the Palesteian authorities planned to pull out of the Oslo Peace Accord. This article will further discuss the Oslo Peace Accord within the context of the IAS Exam. Background of the Oslo Peace Accords The Oslo Accords shows remarkable similarity to the Camp David Accords. The Camp David Accords were a series of agreements which normalised relations between Egypt and Israel in 1978, following the Yom Kippur War 5 years prior. The Camp David Accord themselves envisioned autonomy for the local Palestenians of the West Bank and Gaza. There were concerns about continued Israeli settlement in the West Bank with the number of settlers rising. But the Israeli government refused to talk to the Plaestenian Liberation Organization, because they considered the PLO a terrorist organisation. As a result the Camp David Accords left this issue on the backburner. The situation changed in the 1990s when Israel decided to recognise the PLO as the representatives of the Palestenians and began to negotiate directly with them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights
    A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights © Copyright 2010, The Veritas Handbook. 1st Edition: July 2010. Online PDF, Cost: $0.00 Cover Photo: Ahmad Mesleh This document may be reproduced and redistributed, in part, or in full, for educational and non- profit purposes only and cannot be used for fundraising or any monetary purposes. We encourage you to distribute the material and print it, while keeping the environment in mind. Photos by Ahmad Mesleh, Jon Elmer, and Zoriah are copyrighted by the authors and used with permission. Please see www.jonelmer.ca, www.ahmadmesleh.wordpress.com and www.zoriah.com for detailed copyright information and more information on these photographers. Excerpts from Rashid Khalidi’s Palestinian Identity, Ben White’s Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner’s Guide and Norman Finkelstein’s This Time We Went Too Far are also taken with permission of the author and/or publishers and can only be used for the purposes of this handbook. Articles from The Electronic Intifada and PULSE Media have been used with written permission. We claim no rights to the images included or content that has been cited from other online resources. Contact: [email protected] Web: www.veritashandbook.blogspot.com T h e V E R I T A S H a n d b o o k 2 A Guide to Understanding the Struggle for Palestinian Human Rights To make this handbook possible, we would like to thank 1. The Hasbara Handbook and the Hasbara Fellowships 2. The Israel Project’s Global Language Dictionary Both of which served as great inspirations, convincing us of the necessity of this handbook in our plight to establish truth and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDERABAD, THURSDAY, JUNE 17, 2021; PAGES 12 `3 RNI No
    Follow us on: @TheDailyPioneer facebook.com/dailypioneer HYDERABAD, THURSDAY, JUNE 17, 2021; PAGES 12 `3 RNI No. TELENG/2018/76469 Established 1864 Published From HYDERABAD DELHI LUCKNOW BHOPAL RAIPUR CHANDIGARH BHUBANESWAR RANCHI DEHRADUN VIJAYAWADA *LATE CITY VOL. 3 ISSUE 238 *Air Surcharge Extra if Applicable www.dailypioneer.com Terror, radicalisation P Sensex, Nifty fall P TS Guv lauds P world’s gravest threats 5 from record highs 8 Chiru for his deeds 11 In brief ED issues summons Centre, experts differ over Ronaldo's Coca-Cola India fought second wave snub followed by $4 BN to MP Nama drop in its market value PNS n HYDERABAD gap between vax doses ith a deadpan face and the The Enforcement Directorate has WHO, experts say 8-12weeks; govt OK with 12-16 weeks slightest tinge of derision, issued summons to Khammam using outdated drugs PNS n W star footballer Cristiano MP and TRS Parliamentary Party HYDERABAD Advisory Group on Immunisation Ronaldo picks up two glass bottles of NAVEENA GHANATE leader in the Lok Sabha Nama (NTAGI) Covid working group. Coca-Cola, mutters the company's n HYDERABAD Not just Remdesivir, Nageswara Rao to appear before Across the globe, there are concert- However, the members of the name and sets them aside before several drugs and it for an inquiry on June 25 in a ed efforts to standardize vaccina- organization have since told a holding up a bottle of water. Not long India fought the second wave of therapies which the case of diversion of loans availed tion and treatment protocol for new agency that 12-16 after, the Euro 2020 sponsor saw its Covid-19 with almost outdated from banks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oslo Process in Israeli Perspective
    Difficult Dialogue: The Oslo Process in Israeli Perspective Avraham Sela I. Preface The Oslo Accords seemed to represent the new post-Cold War/ post-Gulf War era, which ostensibly heralded the beginning of a “new world order” under American hegemony. The weakened Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and Arab radical actors, such as Syria and Iraq; the belief that the American-led capitalist, market-oriented ideology had scored its final victory—best expressed by Francis Fuku- yama’s “End of History” thesis; Israel’s vulnerability to Iraq’s medium- range missiles and to American financial pressures; and the perceived loss of Israel’s status as a reliable U.S. ally in a tumultuous Middle East all seemed to have created ripe conditions for a historical breakthrough in the long-stalemated Arab-Israeli peace process. Indeed, the first two years following the signing of the Oslo Accords were especially marked by international optimism, together with a growing temptation to foresee a “new Middle East,” characterized by joint economic ventures, development projects, and social coopera- tion, on both regional and Israeli-Palestinian levels. During this period, Israel and the PLO seemed determined to cement their partnership: implementing the Gaza-Jericho phase, signing the Paris Economic Pro- tocol which defined their economic relations, and signing the Oslo II Accord by which Israel would withdraw from all Palestinian cities, thus transferring responsibility for most of the Palestinians in the West Bank, in addition to Gaza, into the hands of the Palestinian Authority (PA). 105 Macalester International Vol. 23 This discernible progress, however, could hardly blur the signifi- cance of formidable obstacles, first and foremost the internal opposi- tion, with which the leaders on both sides had to cope in the process of implementation of the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • PG 3-6-8.Indd
    SUNDAY 8 17 MARCH 2019 newstodaynet.com newstodaydaily ntchennai CHENNAI Kanaa to be KKABALIABALI ACTRESS remade in Telugu | NT BureauBu | ishwaryaishwarya RajesshRajessh whow acted in the lead in AKanaaKaK naa, will reprepriserises herh role in the Telugu re- makemake asas well.well. It hashas beenbeen titled Kowsalya Krishna- murthymuurthy - CCricketerricketer. TheThhe originalori fi lm was directed by ArunrajaArunraja KKamarajaamaraja anaandd prproduced by Sivakarthikey- PLANS PLENTY an,an, thethe TeluguTelugu remakeremakke will be directed by Bhimaneni SreenivasSreenivas RaoRao anandd prproducedod by KS Ramarao. ApartApart fromfrom Aishwarya,Aishwar the remake will have I am still writing my successuccesss RajendraRajendra Prasad,Prasad, VennelaV Kishore, Jhansi, story, says Radhikaka AAptepte Shashank,Shashank, RaRangasthalamnga Mahesh in im- portantportant roles.roles. TheT dialogues of the fi lm areare writtenwritten by KGF: Chapter 1-fame | NT Bureau | HanumanHaanuman Chowdary. The music will beb composedcomp by Dhibu Ninan Tho- adhika Apte, who became a known face in Bollywood mas,mas, who had also scored for Rpost Sriram Raghavan’s 2014 fi lm Badlapur and thethe TamilT version. The project hogged limelight playing Rajinikanth’s wifefe in Kabali, wentwen on fl oors recently. Aish- says she is still writing her success story. waryaw also has a movie The 32-year-old actor made her debut backk in 2005 with withw Vijay Deverakonda in Shahid Kapoor and Amrita Rao-starrer Vaah!h! LifeLife Ho Toh Telugu.Te Aisi! and over the years she has featured in critically-critically- acclaimed and commercially successful fifilms lms such as Parched, Phobia, Padman, Lust Stories andd Aandhdhun in Hindi. ‘I would love to work with the top stars, womenmen and men.
    [Show full text]
  • Times.US PAGE 1 Times.US Globally Recognized Editor-In-Chief: Azeem A
    APRIL 2018 www.Asia Times.US PAGE 1 www.Asia Times.US Globally Recognized Editor-in-Chief: Azeem A. Quadeer, M.S., P.E. APRIL 2018 Vol 9, Issue 4 Congratulations Shawkat Mohammed 90% of work-permits given to Shawkat Mohammed (Dallas) Achieved Prestigious Million Dollar Round Table ( Top of the Table ) membership H-1B visa-holders’ spouses are again this year. Indians Membership is Exclusive to World’s Leading 30 Mar 2018: 90% of work- The H-4 visa holders don’t were women, and the vast Financial Professionals. permits given to H-1B get a social security num- majority, 93%, were from visa-holders’ spouses are ber, and hence cannot be India, while 4% were from Indians employed. But they can get China.” Congratulations Shawkat Mohammed on achieving MDRT for the 6th time in a row! The United States has Your achievement is the greatest endorsement given work permits to over of your hard work and the trust your clients 71,000 spouses of H-1B visa holders, 90% of whom have put in you. are Indians. In 2015, the Obama government began issu- ing work authorization to spouses of H-1B visa holders. a driver’s license, pursue Spouses of H-1B visa hold- education and open bank Most likely yes: Will things ers who had been living account. change now that Donald in the US for six years, Trump is POTUS? and were in the process of In 2015, 80% of 1,25,000 applying for green cards, people who were issued Donald Trump in his were eligible for this pro- H-4 visas were Indians.
    [Show full text]