DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY B&V Project Number 135720.1200 Funded by the Community Wind Collaborative of the Renewable Energy Trust August 2008 Black & Veatch Corporation 230 Congress Street Suite 802 Boston, MA 02110 Tel: (617) 451-6900 www.bv.com Principal Investigators: Ryan Jacobson, Project Manager Steve Block, Renewable Energy Specialist Justin Ray, Wind Energy Specialist Jason Fields, Wind Energy Specialist Sean Tilley, Wind Energy Specialist © Copyright, Black & Veatch Corporation, 2008. All rights reserved. The Black & Veatch name and logo are registered trademarks of Black & Veatch Holding Company Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Study Results ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 List of Recommendations .................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Background.......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Objective.............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Report Organization............................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Wind Resource........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Wind Data Reviewed ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Wellfleet Met Tower Data and RERL Reports........................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Highlands Center, Truro Wind Data........................................................... 3-6 3.1.3 Eastham SODAR Data................................................................................ 3-9 3.1.4 Provincetown Municipal Airport AWOS Station..................................... 3-11 3.1.5 Massachusetts Wind Resource Map Information ..................................... 3-13 3.2 Site Wind Resource Estimate............................................................................. 3-15 3.3 Resource Estimate Accuracy ............................................................................. 3-20 3.4 Site Viability ...................................................................................................... 3-21 4.0 Site Physical Characteristics...................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 General Description ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Site Usage ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.3 Site Infrastructure................................................................................................. 4-2 4.4 Potential Turbine Location Suitability................................................................. 4-2 4.5 Turbine Separation and Setback .......................................................................... 4-3 4.5.1 Town of Wellfleet Zoning Bylaws ............................................................. 4-3 4.5.2 Turbine Siting Requirements ...................................................................... 4-4 4.5.3 Typical Wind Turbine Spacing................................................................... 4-5 4.5.4 Public Safety ............................................................................................... 4-6 4.5.5 Preliminary Turbine Separation and Setbacks............................................ 4-6 4.6 Site Access........................................................................................................... 4-6 5.0 Site Electrical Infrastructure ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Potential Interconnection Points .......................................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 Existing Wellfleet 576 Substation .............................................................. 5-2 27 August 2008 1 Black & Veatch Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet Table of Contents 5.1.2 New Interconnection Substation................................................................. 5-3 5.2 Interconnection Feasibility................................................................................... 5-3 6.0 Site Vicinity ............................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Description of Site Vicinity ................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 Visual and Noise Impact...................................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Airspace Impact ................................................................................................... 6-9 6.4 Communications Impact .................................................................................... 6-10 6.5 Community Acceptance..................................................................................... 6-12 7.0 Potential Environmental Concerns ............................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Site Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................ 7-1 7.1.1 Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Avian and Bat Impacts.............................................................................. 7-10 7.2 Wetlands ............................................................................................................ 7-10 7.3 Environmental Impact........................................................................................ 7-10 8.0 Permitting................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Site Zoning........................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Wind Development Bylaws ................................................................................. 8-1 8.3 List of Required Permits ...................................................................................... 8-2 8.4 Additional Research........................................................................................... 8-16 8.5 Permitting Timeline ........................................................................................... 8-16 8.6 Next Steps .......................................................................................................... 8-16 9.0 Conceptual Design..................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1 Wind Turbine Models.......................................................................................... 9-1 9.1.1 GE 1.5sle..................................................................................................... 9-1 9.1.2 Vestas V82.................................................................................................. 9-2 9.2 Potential Configurations ...................................................................................... 9-3 9.3 Distance from Key Locations .............................................................................. 9-6 9.4 Appropriateness and Community Impact ............................................................ 9-7 10.0 Project Development Considerations..................................................................... 10-1 10.1 Development and Ownership Options............................................................. 10-1 10.1.1 Municipal Ownership.............................................................................. 10-1 10.1.2 Private Ownership................................................................................... 10-1 10.2 Project Financing ............................................................................................. 10-2 10.3 Development Considerations........................................................................... 10-2 27 August 2008 2 Black & Veatch Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Community Wind Collaborative – Town of Wellfleet Table of Contents 10.4 Operations and Management ........................................................................... 10-3 11.0 Estimated Energy Production ................................................................................ 11-1 11.1 Annual Energy Production............................................................................... 11-1 11.1.1 Wind Turbine Power Curves .................................................................. 11-1 11.1.2 Estimated Losses..................................................................................... 11-2 11.1.3 Production Estimates and Comparisons.................................................. 11-5 11.1.4 Uncertainty Analysis............................................................................... 11-8 11.2 On-Site Energy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species and Habitat Profiles Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting Inc
    Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting Inc. for The Rhode Island Chapter of The Nature Conservancy for The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Table of Contents Introduction to the Species and Habitat Profiles...................................................................... ii Key to Status Ranks .................................................................................................................iv Mammal Table of Contents ....................................................................................................vii Bird Species Table of Contents...............................................................................................viii Herpetofauna Table of Contents.............................................................................................xii Fish Species Table of Contents...............................................................................................xiii Invertebrate Table of Contents...............................................................................................xv Key Habitat Table of Contents .............................................................................................. xxii i Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Species and Habitat Profiles Introduction to the Species and Habitat Profiles New to the 2015 Rhode Island Wildlife Action Plan Revision are the Species and Habitat
    [Show full text]
  • Barrier Beaches: Specialized Habitat for Rare Moths
    Barrier Beach Moths - Their Role in Conservation Mark Mello, Director Emeritus Lloyd Center for the Environment WHY ? Why moths Why me Why dunes Why Moths? • Make up 90% of the 4th largest order (Lepidoptera) of insects • Major prey for neotropical migrant birds • Major pollinators • 37 species of moths listed as rare in the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act • Aesthetics Why Me ? IMPORTANCE OF MOTHS • Enacted in 1992, MA Endangered Species Act (MESA) regulates: • take • Protection of habitat • on private property FACTORS DETERMINING RARITY • Native to and Breeding in Massachusetts • Occurs in limited or Unique habitats • Globally “Rare” Species • Evidence of decline • Habitat loss • On the Federal Endangered Species List Papaipema sulphurata Re-emergence of Survey Work • 1983 – Dale Schweitzer proposed list • 1992 – MA Endangered Species Act Promuglated (28 moths) • 2019 – Current List includes 37 moths 5 dropped off; 14 added • Changes due to intensive field work • 1986 (10% my time to 2019 (80% time) Who’s on the MESA List BARRENS/HEATHLANDS WETLANDS SANDPLAIN GRASSLANDS BARRIER DUNES OTHER Coastal Heathlands Cutworm Drunk Apamea The Pink Streak Coastal Heathlands Cutworm NJ Tea Inchworm Barrens Daggermoth Pale Green Pinion Unexpected Cycnia Dune Noctuid Twilight Moth Gerhard’s Underwing Coastal Swamp Metarranthis Phyllira Tiger Moth The Pink Streak Orange Sallow Melsheimer’s Sack Bearer Pitcher Plant Borer Northern Brocade Chain-dot Geometer Ostrich Fern Borer Imperial Moth Chain Fern Borer Sandplain Euchlaena Water-willow Borer
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1A, B, C, D, E, F
    Appendix 1a, b, c, d, e, f Table of Contents Appendix 1a. Rhode Island SWAP Data Sources ....................................................................... 1 Appendix 1b. Rhode Island Species of Greatest Conservation Need .................................... 19 Appendix 1c. Regional Conservation Needs-Species of Greatest Conservation Need ....... 48 Appendix 1d. List of Rare Plants in Rhode Island .................................................................... 60 Appendix 1e: Summary of Rhode Island Vertebrate Additions and Deletions to 2005 SGCN List ....................................................................................................................................................... 75 Appendix 1f: Summary of Rhode Island Invertebrate Additions and Deletions to 2005 SGCN List ....................................................................................................................................................... 78 APPENDIX 1a: RHODE ISLAND WAP DATA SOURCES Appendix 1a. Rhode Island SWAP Data Sources This appendix lists the information sources that were researched, compiled, and reviewed in order to best determine and present the status of the full array of wildlife and its conservation in Rhode Island (Element 1). A wide diversity of literature and programs was consulted and compiled through extensive research and coordination efforts. Some of these sources are referenced in the Literature Cited section of this document, and the remaining sources are provided here as a resource for users and implementing
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    Massachusetts Chapter 3 2015 State Wildlife Action Plan Species of Greatest Conservation Need 3 Species of Greatest Conservation Need A: Introduction and Selection Criteria Five hundred and seventy species were determined to Identifying Species of Greatest Conservation Need for be Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) in this update followed much the same set of criteria as in Massachusetts, including: the 2005 SWAP: 172 vertebrates All species, including plants, listed under the authority 29 fishes of the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA) 5 amphibians were included on the updated SWAP list. The MESA list 20 reptiles is regularly updated; the list change procedure involves 95 birds solicitation of comments on listing proposals from at 23 mammals least three external scientific reviewers and from the 115 invertebrates public. See 8 miscellaneous invertebrates http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dfg/nhesp/species- 10 freshwater mussels and-conservation/listing-criteria.pdf or Appendix A for a full description of the MESA listing criteria and 8 crustaceans process. 27 dragonflies and damselflies 9 beetles All species given a global rank of G1 through G3G4 44 butterflies and moths (globally rare species) by NatureServe were 9 bees considered for inclusion. See the explanation of 283 plants abbreviations at the end of Table 3-2 for definition of global ranks. A few globally rare species that 21 Massachusetts Chapter 3 2015 State Wildlife Action Plan Species of Greatest Conservation Need occur in Massachusetts were not included in the animals (Stein and Gravuer, 2008) and that current SWAP list. In general, these species are conservation of the breadth of biodiversity in our considered relatively secure in Massachusetts or to Commonwealth must include plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates
    Pennsylvania’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Invertebrates Version 1.1 Prepared by John E. Rawlins Carnegie Museum of Natural History Section of Invertebrate Zoology January 12, 2007 Cover photographs (top to bottom): Speyeria cybele, great spangled fritillary (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) (Rank: S5G5) Alaus oculatus., eyed elater (Coleoptera: Elateridae)(Rank: S5G5) Calosoma scrutator, fiery caterpillar hunter (Coleoptera: Carabidae) (Rank: S5G5) Brachionycha borealis, boreal sprawler moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), last instar larva (Rank: SHG4) Metarranthis sp. near duaria, early metarranthis moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (Rank: S3G4) Psaphida thaxteriana (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Rank: S4G4) Pennsylvania’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Invertebrates Version 1.1 Prepared by John E. Rawlins Carnegie Museum of Natural History Section of Invertebrate Zoology January 12, 2007 This report was filed with the Pennsylvania Game Commission on October 31, 2006 as a product of a State Wildlife Grant (SWG) entitled: Rawlins, J.E. 2004-2006. Pennsylvania Invertebrates of Special Concern: Viability, Status, and Recommendations for a Statewide Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan in Pennsylvania. In collaboration with the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (C.W. Bier) and The Nature Conservancy (A. Davis). A Proposal to the State Wildlife Grants Program, Pennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Text portions of this report are an adaptation of an appendix to a statewide conservation strategy prepared as part of federal requirements for the Pennsylvania State Wildlife Grants Program, specifically: Rawlins, J.E. 2005. Pennsylvania Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS)-Priority Invertebrates. Appendix 5 (iii + 227 pp) in Williams, L., et al. (eds.). Pennsylvania Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. Pennsylvania Game Commission and Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission. Version 1.0 (October 1, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Key Species and Habitats in Greatest Need of Conservation
    Appendices A: MESA Listing Criteria Listing Endangered Species in Massachusetts The Basis, Criteria, and Procedure for Listing Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife February 7, 2008 Last updated February 7, 2008 Approved by the NHES Advisory Committee, March 13, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction 2 …………………………………………………………………. Guiding Principles 3 ………………………………………………………….. Definitions 4 ………………………………………………………………….. Criteria for Changes to the MESA List 7 …………………………………….. MESA Listing, Delisting, and Status Change Procedure 13 …………………... Appendix A: Proposal Form for Listing Change 15 …………………………… Appendix B: Assessment Form for Listing Change 17 ………………………... Appendix C: Excerpt from the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act 21 …… Appendix D: Excerpt from the Code of Massachusetts Regulations 22 ……….. Appendix E: Guidelines for Dealing with Peripheral 25 Populations………….. Literature Cited 28 ……………………………………………………………... Last updated February 7, 2008 Approved by the NHES Advisory Committee, March 13, 2008 Introduction ▪ What is the purpose of this document? This document describes the basis, criteria, and procedure with which decisions are made regarding the listing and delisting of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern species in Massachusetts. Listing is based on the Massachusetts Endangered Species Act (MESA) statute (see Appendix C) and its implementing regulations (see Appendix D). ▪ What is the basis for the guidelines? The guidelines build upon listing policy as administered since implementation of the MESA regulations in 1991, and draw upon other major systems used in the assessment of extinction risk, particularly the systems of NatureServe (Master et al. 2007) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2001). Concordance with these and other major systems is sought through the use of three main criteria in the assessment of extinction risk: rarity, trend, and threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island's Wildlife
    Chapter 1 Rhode Island’s Fish and Wildlife CHAPTER 1: RHODE ISLAND’S FISH AND WILDLIFE Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Regional Context ............................................................................................................................ 1 The Fish and Wildlife of Rhode Island ......................................................................................... 4 Mammals..................................................................................................................................... 5 Birds of the Northeast Region ................................................................................................ 11 Rhode Island Birds .................................................................................................................. 12 Marine Birds .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Wetland Birds ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Birds of Upland Habitats ............................................................................................................................. 22 Other Bird Species of Greatest Conservation Need .......................................................................... 25 Reptiles and Amphibians
    [Show full text]
  • Nomans Land Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 2010
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Nomans Land Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan September 2010 Nomans Land Island Cliffs Erin Victory/TCI This goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal Federal agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 150-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of more than 550 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 70 national fish hatcheries and 81 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces Federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores nationally significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Assistance Program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Nomans Land Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Septmeber 2010 Refuge Vision Statement We envision Nomans Land Island NWR to be a vital and unique maritime resource for migratory birds along the Atlantic Flyway.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife
    Natural Heritage Drunk Apamea Moth & Endangered Species Apamea inebriata Program State Status: Special Concern www.mass.gov/nhesp Federal Status: None Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife DESCRIPTION: The Drunk Apamea Moth (Apamea inebriata) is a noctuid moth with a forewing length of 15- 19 mm (Ferguson 1977). The forewing is longitudinally streaked with straw-yellow along the costal margin, reddish-brown through the median area, black between the median area and the inner margin, and whitish-gray along the inner margin, giving an overall appearance that is cryptic on dead wood (Mikkola et al. 2009). The reniform spot is faintly outlined with black and white dots. The hind wings are tan to brown, darker toward the wing margin, with a faint, elongate discal spot. Elongate scales on the head and thorax are a mixture of straw-yellow, reddish-brown, black, and whitish-gray, matching the overall coloration of the forewing. The abdomen is tan with elongate, reddish-brown and white scales dorsally. Apamea inebriata ▪ Specimen from MA: Plymouth Co., Plymouth, Apamea inebriata was described and separated from the collected 27 Jul 2002 by M.W. Nelson similar and more common and widespread Apamea verbascoides by Ferguson (1977). As compared to A. Adult Flight Period in Massachusetts verbascoides, A. inebriata is slightly smaller (forewing Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec length ~1 mm shorter on average) and has a brighter appearance overall, with brown streaks that are more reddish, and the gray area along the inner margin more Additionally, the small white patch of scales at the whitish and contrasting.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of North Carolina
    NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE ANIMAL SPECIES OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Great Tiger Moth (Arctia caja) photo by Stephen P. Hall Compiled by Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Vertebrate Zoologist John T. Finnegan, Conservation Information Manager Stephen P. Hall, Landscape Ecologist Andrea J. Leslie, Freshwater Ecologist Judith A. Ratcliffe, Freshwater Ecologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, & Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE ANIMAL SPECIES OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Compiled by Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Vertebrate Zoologist John T. Finnegan, Conservation Information Manager Stephen P. Hall, Landscape Ecologist Andrea J. Leslie, Freshwater Ecologist Judith A. Ratcliffe, Freshwater Ecologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as further data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years. Further information on these species may be obtained by contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601, or by contacting the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, 1722 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1722. Additional information on rare species, as well as a digital version of
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Check List of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America North of Mexico
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysAnnotated 40: 1–239 (2010) check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico J. Donald Lafontaine1, B. Christian Schmidt2 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 Corresponding authors: J. Donald Lafontaine ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt (Chris. [email protected]) Academic editor: James K. Adams | Received 30 November 2009 | Accepted 14 February 2010 | Published 19 March 2010 Citation: Lafontaine JD, Schmidt BC (2010) Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico. ZooKeys 40: 1–239. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 Abstract An annotated check list of the North American species of Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera) is presented, consist- ing of 3693 species. One-hundred and sixty-six taxonomic changes are proposed, consisting of 13 species- group taxa accorded species status (stat. n. and stat. rev.), 2 revalidated genus-group taxa (stat. rev.), and 2 family-group taxa raised to subfamily. Sixty-nine species-group taxa are downgraded to junior synonyms or subspecies (stat. n., syn. rev., and syn. n.), and 6 genera relegated to synonymy.
    [Show full text]