Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan June 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................4 1.1 Background and Focus ..........................................................................4 1.2 Study Area .........................................................................................4 1.3 Relevant Studies ..................................................................................7 2 Existing Conditions................................................................................... 15 2.1 Market Assessment ............................................................................ 15 2.2 Existing Market Conditions .................................................................. 16 3 Service Evaluation.................................................................................... 26 3.1 Service Fundamentals for Transit Design................................................ 26 4 Existing Service Conditions........................................................................ 28 4.1 Transit Route Network ........................................................................ 28 5 Gold and Northwest Corridor Service Plan.................................................... 42 5.1 Gold and Northwest Bus Service Recommendations ................................ 46 5.2 Resource Impacts............................................................................... 50 6 Process .................................................................................................. 52 Tables Table 1 - G-Line Planned Operations ....................................................................8 Table 2 - B-Line Planned Operations ................................................................... 11 Table 3 - West Corridor Service Plan Recommendations and Straegies .................... 13 Table 4- Current Gold Corridor Bus Routes .......................................................... 29 Table 5- Current Northwest Corridor Bus Routes .................................................. 29 Table 6 - Current Gold Corridor Transit Route Network ......................................... 31 Table 7 - Current Northwest Corridor Transit Route Network ................................. 32 Table 8 - RTD Service Standards ....................................................................... 34 Table 9 - RTD Average Farebox Recovery by Service Class ................................... 38 Table 10 - Gold Line Corridor Bus Route Performance Metrics ................................ 40 Table 11 - Northwest Corridor Bus Route Performance Metrics .............................. 40 Table 12 - Proposed Gold and Northwest Corridor Bus Service Levels ..................... 46 Table 13 - Existing Gold and Northwest Corridor Bus Service Requirements ............. 51 Table 14 - Proposed Gold and Northwest Corridor Bus Service Requirements ........... 52 Figures Figure 1 - G-Line Projected Average Daily Boardings ...............................................8 Figure 2 - G-Line Mode of Access, 2030 ..............................................................9 Figure 3 - B-Line Mode of Access, 2035............................................................. 11 Figure 4- Downtown Denver Commute Choice, 2013 ........................................... 12 Figure 5- Gold Corridor Bus Routes, Subsidy per Boarding, 2012 ............................ 34 Figure 6 - Northwest Corrdor Bus Routes, Subsidy perBoarding 2012 ..................... 35 Figure 7 - Gold Corridor Bus Routes, Boardings per Hours, 2014 ............................ 36 Figure 8 - Northwest Corridor Bus Routes, Boardings per Hours, 2014 .................... 37 Figure 9- Gold Corridor Bus Routes, Farebox Recovery 2012 ................................. 38 Figure 10- Northwest Corridor Bus Routes, Farebox Recovery 2012 ....................... 39 2 Maps Map 1 - G-Line Alignment ..................................................................................5 Map 2 - B Line Alignment ...................................................................................6 Map 3- Station Boardings, Mode of Access to Stations, Passenger Volumes Between Stations ........................................................................................................ 10 Map 4- Westminster Station Transit Oriented Development ................................... 14 Map 5 - Population & Employment Density in 2015.............................................. 20 Map 6 - Minority Population Density in 2012....................................................... 21 Map 7 - Minority Population - Density in 2012..................................................... 22 Map 8 - Zero Vehicle Households, Density in 2012 .............................................. 23 Map 9 - Senior Citizens Density in 2012............................................................. 24 Map 10- Service Plan Recommended Network Map .............................................. 47 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Background and Focus As part of the overall FasTracks program to enhance rail service in the Denver region, the upcoming Gold Line and Northwest Line also known as the G-Line and B-Line respectively will represent significant milestones in achieving improved connectivity and travel times for RTD customers. Both projects are likely to stimulate residential, retail, and commercial growth and contribute to increases in ridership within the corridors. The Gold and Northwest Corridor Service Plan contains recommendations for developing a restructured bus network capable of meeting the demand and mobility needs generated by the expansion of commuter rail and light rail services. Recommendations in this study were formulated based on a comprehensive assessment of existing conditions, service area demographics, transit market research, route performance and analysis, and stakeholder input. Data collection activities included both on-site field work and stakeholder meetings held with RTD and FasTracks personnel. 1.2 Study Area The study area of this project is defined by the RTD West Line to the south, the US 36 & Broomfield Park-n-Ride to the north, Interstate 25 and downtown Denver to the east, and the City of Golden to the west. The study area includes the cities of Arvada, Denver, Thornton, Westminster, and Wheat Ridge, as well as unincorporated areas in Denver and Jefferson Counties. 4 Map 1 - G-Line Alignment The G-Line is a future 11.2-mile commuter rail line that will run along the BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad right of way from Denver Union Station (DUS) to the City of Wheat Ridge. The G-Line will serve eight stations, including DUS, 41st/Fox, Pecos Junction, Clear Creek/Federal, 60th & Sheridan/Arvada Gold Strike, Olde Town Arvada, Arvada Ridge, and Wheat Ridge/Ward. The G-Line is expected to open in 2016. Total travel time between DUS and the Wheat Ridge/Ward terminal station is approximately 25 minutes. 5 Map 2 - B Line Alignment 6 The B-Line is a future 41-mile commuter rail line from Denver Union Station (DUS) to Longmont, passing through the Cities of Westminster, Broomfield, Louisville, Boulder, and Gunbarrel. Portions of the B-Line are adjacent to the US 36 BRT project. The first 6.2-mile segment from DUS to south Westminster is expected to be completed in 2016 and will be the focus area of this study. This segment will serve two stations including Denver Union Station and Westminster/71st Ave. The remaining segment of the project, from Westminster north to Longmont, will require additional funding before construction can begin. 1.3 Relevant Studies The following review highlights the key findings from previous planning studies and publications relevant to the study area, which include: • Gold Line Corridor Transit Operations Plan (2009) • Northwest Rail Corridor Final Environmental Evaluation (2010) • West Corridor Service Plan (2013) • Downtown Denver Commuter Survey (2013) • Arvada Transit Station Framework Plan (2007) • Westminster Station Transit Oriented Development • Wheat Ridge Northwest Subarea Plan (2013) Arvada Transit Station Framework Plan (2007) The Arvada Transit Station Plan envisions the development of a transit oriented district surrounding the station of Olde Town Arvada on the G-Line. The plan creates two distinct downtown mixed-use development districts: Olde Town and New Town. New Town would include an increased mix of land uses, including medium density housing and commercial/office space, while the historic character of Olde Town would be preserved by maintaining the existing scale of development. Gold Line Corridor Transit Operations Plan (2009) The Gold Line Corridor Transit Operations Plan contains bus and rail operations plans related to the environmental benefits, costs, and impacts of the proposed service alternatives. Existing transit service descriptions and characteristics of the corridor and corresponding routes are provided. Two alternatives for transit service are presented within the bus operations plan, including the “No Action” and “Baseline” alternatives. The “No Action” alternative assumes no new major transit investments with only the existing plus committed facility and operating improvements assumed. The “Baseline” alternative contains operating improvements designed to improve transit access, circulation, and travel time within the study area. 7 The rail operations service plan includes the following proposed service levels on the G- Line: Table 1 - G-Line Planned
Recommended publications
  • Railway Network
    Railway Network Railways play a vital role in serving the transport needs of COVID-19 pandemic. By end 2020, the AEL carries about Hong Kong. They account for about 39 per cent of domestic 8 400 passenger trips per day. public transport by end 2020. Light Rail: Light Rail is a local transportation network Existing Network: The existing railway network in Hong which started operation in 1988 to meet the transport needs of Kong has a total route length of about 263 kilometres. The the residents in the northwest New Territories. It now has a Legislative Council passed in June 2007 the Rail Merger route length of about 36 km with 68 stops. By end 2020, it Ordinance which provides the legal framework for the carries an average of about 305 600 passenger trips every post-merger corporation to operate both the Mass Transit day. It has four interchange stations in Yuen Long, Tin Shui Railway (MTR) system and Kowloon-Canton Railway (KCR) Wai, Siu Hong and Tuen Mun to facilitate passenger system. The post-merger Corporation, i.e. the MTR interchange between the Light Rail and West Rail Line Corporation Limited (MTRCL) has been granted a 50-year networks. franchise to operate the MTR and KCR systems with effect from December 2, 2007. Other fixed track systems include the Hong Kong Section of Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Tramway and the Peak Tram. Kong Express Rail Link (XRL): The Hong Kong section of the XRL, commissioned in September 2018, is a 26-km long MTR: MTR is a heavily patronized railway network underground rail corridor connecting Hong Kong with the consisting of 10 heavy rail lines, Airport Express and the Hong national high-speed rail network.
    [Show full text]
  • Broncosride Pickup Schedule for December 22, 2019
    BroncosRide and Light Rail Service page 1 of 2 BroncosRide Schedule for: Sunday, December 22, 2019 Route: Park-n-Ride / Stop / Station Times are approximate Post game bus location** BR26: Dry Creek & University 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 12:55 PM Row 22 Arapahoe High School BR24: Alameda Havana 12:25 PM 12:40 PM 12:55 PM Row 21 BR10: Boulder High School 11:35 AM 11:55 AM 12:15 PM Row15-16 Arapahoe & 17th BR32: El Rancho 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:35 PM Row 4 BR32: Evergreen 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:20 PM Row 4 BR38: Federal Shuttle: Lincoln HS (Hazel Ct & Iliff) and bus stops on Federal Blvd 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5 - 10 minutes until 1:50 PM Row 28 between Evans and 8th Ave BR20: Longmont Park-n-Ride 11:30 AM 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:30 PM Rows 17-18 815 South Main Street BR44: Nine Mile (Ga te F) 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:00 PM Rows 23-24 BR8: Olde Town Arvada Discontinued Discontinued: Ride G-Line to DUS and Transfer to C, E or W-Lines to Broncos Stadium BR48: Parker 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM Row 19 BR48: Pinery 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:05 PM 12:20 PM Row 19 BR56: South High School 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:35 PM 12:50 PM Row 26 Louisiana & Gilpin BR4: Thornton (Gate C) 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:35 PM Rows 9-12 BR10: US 36 & Broomfield Station (Gate 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:55 AM 12:05 PM 12:15 PM 12:25 PM 12:45 PM Rows 15-16 K) BR10: US 36 & McCaslin Stn (Gate A) 11:45
    [Show full text]
  • Final West Corridor Service Plan 2013
    Final West Corridor Service Plan 2013 October 2012 Final West Corridor Service Plan 2013 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background & Focus ....................................................................................... 4 1.2 Relevant Studies ............................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 West Corridor Environmental Impact Study (EIS) – 2004 .............................. 5 1.2.2 2007 West Corridor Transit Plan ............................................................... 5 1.2.3 Lessons Learned from Previous RTD LRT Corridor Implementations ................ 5 2 Current Transit Market Assessment ....................................................................... 6 2.1 Population Density 2005 ................................................................................. 7 2.2 Employment Density 2005 ............................................................................... 7 3 Current Service Evaluation .................................................................................. 10 3.1 Transit Route Network .................................................................................. 10 3.2 Transit Service Levels ................................................................................... 10 3.3 Transit Passenger Facilities ............................................................................ 13 3.4 Ridership ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hung Hom Station to Transform Into an Upgraded Interchange Hub New Interchange Arrangements for the East Rail Line and West Rail Line
    PR040/21 7 June 2021 Hung Hom Station to Transform into an Upgraded Interchange Hub New Interchange Arrangements for the East Rail Line and West Rail Line The new Tuen Ma Line (“TML”) platform at Hung Hom Station (“HUH”) will be opened on 20 June 2021 (Sunday), i.e. one week before the commissioning of TML, and new interchange arrangements for the West Rail Line (“WRL”) and the East Rail Line (“EAL”) will be in place on the same day. A series of upgrading works, including the construction of new platforms, have been implemented at HUH to cope with the full opening of the TML, as well as the commissioning of the Cross-Harbour Section of EAL. The new platforms will be put into service in phases according to the progress of the two projects. While the Cross-Harbour Section of EAL is still under construction, upon the opening of the new TML platform at HUH, passengers have to pass through the concourse to reach the existing EAL platform and the WRL (future TML) platform for changing between EAL and WRL (future TML) at HUH. (Please refer to annex for details). Passengers will have to follow the new interchange arrangements until the commissioning of the Cross-Harbour Section of EAL and the full launch of the new two-level platforms at HUH. By then passengers will be taking the EAL and TML at the new platforms. “Signage with colours corresponding to the relevant rail lines will be installed to direct passengers to the platforms they want to go to. We will also deploy additional staff, put up notices and make public announcements to assist and remind passengers of the new arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview
    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and FasTracks Overview RTD oversees a 47-mile rail transit system that services 46 stations on five corridors including: • The 5.3-mile Central Corridor and 1.8-mile Central Platte Valley (CPV) Spur in central Denver • The 8.7-mile Southwest Line to Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton • The 19.2-mile Southeast Line to Lone Tree and Aurora • The 12.1-mile West Line to Lakewood and Golden The FasTracks program, approved by district voters in a 2004 ballot initiative will: • add 122 miles of rail service • 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • approximately 60 new stations along six new corridors • extend three existing light rail lines image courtesy Gensler Grand Opening / image courtesy RTD Construction cranes dominated the skyline in RTD and TOD STAMPs Underway STAMPs Kicking Off 2013, as the result of an apartment boom in in 2014 the metro area. Development in 2013 centered Transit-oriented development is typically on the hub of the FasTracks program: Denver higher density and incorporates a mixture C-470/Lucent Station I-25/Broadway Station Area Master Plan Area Master Plan Union Station which is scheduled to open in of different uses that generate transit rider- spring 2014. Significant development has also ship. Multiple TODs contribute to creating 104th Ave. Station TOD Fitzsimons Parkway occurred around other existing and future transit-oriented communities where people Master Planning Study Station Area Master Plan stations as construction of FasTracks corridors can live, work, reduce transportation costs, continues at a rapid pace. and improve overall health through increased 88th Avenue Station Civic Center Station muli-modal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • LC Paper No. CB(4)1029/20-21(01)
    LC Paper No. CB(4)1029/20-21(01) Legislative Council Panel on Transport Subcommittee on Matters Relating to Railways Operating Arrangements for the Tuen Ma Line (Translation) Introduction The Tuen Ma Line (“TML”) under the Shatin to Central Link (“SCL”) project will be commissioned on 27 June 2021. This paper informs Members of the operating arrangements for the TML. Background 2. The SCL project consists of two Sections: (a) the Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section comprising the stations of Tai Wai, Hin Keng, expanded Diamond Hill, Kai Tak, Sung Wong Toi, To Kwa Wan, Ho Man Tin and expanded Hung Hom. This section will join the original Ma On Shan Line and the existing West Rail Line to form the TML, while the TML Phase 1 (“TML1”), comprising the section between Tai Wai and Kai Tak, was commissioned in February 2020; and (b) the Hung Hom to Admiralty Section comprising the stations of expanded Hung Hom, Exhibition Centre and expanded Admiralty – this is an extension of the East Rail Line from Hung Hom across the Victoria Harbour to Wan Chai North and Admiralty. The alignment of the TML and updated MTRCL route map are at Annex 1. 3. The SCL is funded and owned by the Government under the concession approach. In preparation for the commissioning of the TML, the Government, the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation (“KCRC”) and the MTR Corporation Limited (“MTRCL”) make an arrangement similar to that of the commissioning of the TML1 in February 2020. Prior to the commissioning of the TML, the Government will vest the TML in KCRC which is wholly owned by the Government and then KCRC will grant the right to operate the TML to MTRCL under the service concession approach.
    [Show full text]
  • RTD Director Map District M
    TENNYSNST Olde Town Arvada EASLEY RD GRANDVIEW AV 56TH AV ZUNI ST Olde Town Station UV391 76 RIDGE RD ¨¦§ 54TH AV ARVADA I 53RD AV INDIANAST TEJONST 52ND AV W 52ND AVE W 52ND AVE 0 0.475 0.95 Arvada Ridge StationCARRST 52ND AV RIDGE RD UV95 Chaffee Park Miles 72 MARSHALL ST 93 UV Regis W REGIS BLVD W 50TH AVE UV 50TH AV ST TABOR KIPLINGST ELDRIDGEST 49TH AV Ward Road Station GARRISON ST 48TH AV 48TH AV W 48TH AVE W 48TH AVE RTD Director MCINTYREST Ward Road UV121 Berkeley W 46TH AVE LAKESIDE NTEJON ST Districts NTENNYSON ST W 44TH AVE 44TH AV NIRVING ST WHEAT RIDGE NLOWELL BLVD Sunnyside UV93 MOUNTAIN VIEW 38TH AV HARLAN ST W 38TH AVE 46 UV YOUNGFIELDST Legend W 35TH AVE W 35TH AVE LightRail Stations West Highland X" NIRVING ST Highland UV93 W 32ND AVE W 32ND AVE NZUNI ST WASHINGTON AV 32ND AV ParkNRides 10TH ST ELDRIDGE ST 29TH AV W 29TH AVE COUNTIES 27TH AV W 26TH AVE Current Director Dist FORD ST 26TH AV ¤£6 Jefferson Park Other Director Dist Sloan Lake W 23RD AVE WATER ST Pepsi Center - Elitch Gardens Station FASTRACKS EDGEWATER 287 70 20TH AV ¤£ 19TH ST ¨¦§ Auraria LightrailLines INVESCO Field at Mile High Station W 17TH AVE ¤£287 BusRoutes 6 25 ¤£ GOLDEN 70 West Colfax 40 ¨¦§ ¤£Auraria West Station¨¦§ 14TH AV Lakewood - Wadsworth Station W 14TH AVE N KNOX CT GOLDEN RD Sheridan Station ULYSSES ST ULYSSES Sun Valley M Oak Station Garrison Station Lamar Station Lincoln Park 10TH AV 10TH AV W 10TH AVE Knox Station 10TH AV Perry Station N ZUNI ST NST PERRY SIMMSST 40 ¤£ VillaNKNOX CT Park W 8TH AVE 8TH AV 121 OAKST UV INDIANA ST INDIANA
    [Show full text]
  • Thornton Crossroads at 104Th Station Area Master Plan
    January 13, 2015 Acknowledgments The Project Team would like to thank and acknowledge the significant contributions of the members of this plan’s Project Management Team and Technical Advisory Committee, who provided valuable guidance and vision throughout the course of the planning process. We would also like to thank attendees who participated in the Developer Forum on June 25, 2014. Mayor and City Council Members Mayor Heidi K. Williams Ward I Jenice “JJ” Dove Mack Goodman Ward II Eric Montoya Val Vigil, Mayor Pro Tem Ward III Beth Martinez Humenik Sam Nizam Ward IV Eric Tade Jan Kulmann City of Thornton Project Management Team Jack Ethredge City Manager Jeff Coder, AICP Deputy City Manager, City Development Glenda Lainis, AICP Policy Planning Manager Robert Larsen, AICP Senior Planner Technical Advisory Committe Pete Brezall City of Thornton Dante Carbone City of Thornton Tyler Dunn City of Thornton Buz Hedglin City of Thornton Mark Heller, AICP, JD City of Thornton Lori Hight, AICP City of Thornton Julie Jacoby City of Thornton Nicole Jeffers City of Thornton Jim Kaiser, P.E. City of Thornton Heath Klein, P.E. City of Thornton Adam Krueger City of Thornton Karen Widomski City of Thornton Mike Mallon, AICP City of Thornton Chad McCollum , P.E. City of Thornton Allison Moe City of Thornton Martin Postma, CEcD City of Thornton Gene Putman, P.E., PTOE City of Thornton Paula Schulte City of Thornton Alan Sielaff City of Thornton Deb Turner, P.E. City of Thornton Diane VanFossen City of Thornton Lee Vitgenos City of Thornton Rebecca Smith,
    [Show full text]
  • MTR's Experiences in PPP for Railway Projects
    MTR’s Experiences in PPP for Railway Projects Dr Jacob Kam Managing Director – Operations & Mainland Business 11 May 2017 MTR Businesses in China and Overseas 港铁公司在国内及海外的铁路业务 Line 4 & Daxing Line 1.881 Mil Line 14, Line 16 113.4 km Elizabeth Line Stockholm Metro 14.2k 1.228 mil 32.5 km 110km South Western rail Contract started MTR Express Hangzhou Metro Line 537k 53.7km from Aug 2017 455km(shared track) 1 and Ext Shenzhen Metro 550k Stockholm Hong Kong MTR Line 4 and Ext Commuter rail 20.5km 8.6 mil 34.3k 266 km 241 km Sydney Metro 36 km North West Under construction Melbourne Metro • Over 1,200km route length (exclude shared track) • Over 14 Million Passenger trips per weekday (using line based counting) 812k • Line based passenger trips do not match with the passenger trip data in annual report 390km MTR Corporation 5/16/2017 Page 2 Why cities need railways? • High capacity • High energy efficiency, low carbon emission In persons per hour in both direction Source: UITP MTR Corporation 5/16/2017 Page 3 Why cities need railways? Effective land use Modal Bus Rapid Bus Tram Light Rail Metro Characteristics Transit Max Flow 2,500 6,000 12,000 18,000 30,000 & above (per hour per direction) Average speed 10-14 15-22 15-22 18-40 18-40 (kph) Reliability Improving Good Medium to Good Good Very Good Mixed running Largely Road-space Mixed running Totally segregated and on-road tram segregated Totally segregated with traffic alignment Allocation lanes alignments All underground: Land Consumed 15 – 25 times 10 – 15 times 5 – 10 times 3 – 6 times 1
    [Show full text]
  • The Arup Journal
    KCRC EAST RAIL EXTENSIONS SPECIAL ISSUE 3/2007 The Arup Journal Foreword After 10 years' planning, design, and construction, the opening of the Lok Ma Chau spur line on 15 August 2007 marked the completion of the former Kowloon­ Canton Railway Corporation's East Rail extension projects. These complex pieces of infrastructure include 11 km of mostly elevated railway and a 6ha maintenance and repair depot for the Ma On Shan line, 7.4km of elevated and tunnelled route for the Lok Ma Chau spur line, and a 1 km underground extension of the existing line from Hung Hom to East Tsim Sha Tsui. Arup was involved in all of these, from specialist fire safety strategy for all the Ma On Shan line stations, to multidisciplinary planning, design, and construction supervision, and, on the Lok Ma Chau spur line, direct work for a design/build contractor. In some cases our involvement went from concept through to handover. For example, we were part of a special contractor-led team that carried out a tunnel feasibility study for the Lok Ma Chau spur line across the ecologically sensitive Long Valley. At East Tsim Sha Tsui station we worked closely with the KCRC and numerous government departments to re-provide two public recreation spaces - Middle Road Children's playground at the foot of the historic Signal Hill, and Wing On Plaza garden - examples that show the importance of environmental issues for the KCRC in expanding Hong Kong's railway network. This special issue of The Arup Journal is devoted to all of our work on the East Rail extensions, and our feasibility study for the Kowloon Southern Link, programmed to connect West Rail and East Rail by 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Network Hong Kong Operating Network with Future Extensions
    OUR NETWORK HONG KONG OPERATING NETWORK WITH FUTURE EXTENSIONS Shenzhen Lo Wu Intercity Through Train Route Map Beijing hau i C Lok Ma Shanghai Sheung Shu g Beijing Line Guangzhou Fanlin Shanghai Line Kwu Tung Guangdong Line n HONG KONG SAR Dongguan San Ti Tai Wo Long Yuen Long t Ping 48 41 47 Ngau a am Tam i Sh i K Mei a On Shan a Tai Po Marke 36 K Sheungd 33 M u u ui Wa W Roa Au Tau Tin Sh 49 Heng On y ui Hung Shui Ki g ng 50 New Territories Tai Sh Universit Han Siu Ho 30 39 n n 27 35 Shek Mu 29 Tuen Mu cecourse* e South Ra o Tan Area 16 F 31 City On Tuen Mun n 28 a n u Sha Ti Sh n Ti 38 Wai Tsuen Wan West 45 Tsuen05 Wa Tai Wo Ha Che Kung 40 Temple Kwai Hing 07 i 37 Tai Wa Hin Keng 06 l Kwai Fong o n 18 Mei Fo k n g Yi Diamond Hil Kowloon Choi Wa Tsin Tong n i King Wong 25 Shun Ti La Lai Chi Ko Lok Fu d Tai Si Choi Cheung Sha Wan Hung Sau Mau Ping ylan n ay e Sham Shui Po ei Kowloon ak u AsiaWorld-Expo B 46 ShekM T oo Po Tat y Disn Resort m Po Lam Na Kip Kai k 24 Kowl y Sunn eong g Hang Ha Prince n Ba Ch o Sungong 01 53 Airport M Mong W Edward ok ok East 20 K K Toi ong 04 To T Ho Kwa Ngau Tau Ko Cable Car n 23 Olympic Yau Mai Man Wan 44 n a Kwun Ti Ngong Ping 360 19 52 42 n Te Ti 26 Tung Chung East am O 21 L Tung Austi Yau Tong Tseung Chung on Whampo Kwan Tung o n Jordan Tiu g Kowl loo Tsima Hung 51 Ken Chung w Sh Hom Leng West Hong Kong Tsui 32 t Tsim Tsui West Ko Eas 34 22 ha Fortress10 Hill Hong r S ay LOHAS Park ition ew 09 Lantau Island ai Ying Pun Kong b S Tama xhi aus North h 17 11 n E C y o y Centre Ba Nort int 12 16 Po 02 Tai
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: a Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line
    Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: A Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line June 2014 Gold Line Corridor Working Group Members (in alphabetical order): About This Report • Steve Art, City of Wheat Ridge – Economic Development This report documents existing conditions and planning efforts along the • Chris Auxier, Adams County Housing Authority • Michelle Claymore, Jefferson County Economic Development Gold Line Corridor as of December 2013. It also identifies opportunities • Alan Feinstein, Jefferson County Housing Authority and challenges to implementing the visions of these plans, and provides • Joelle Greenland, Adams County – Planning recommendations for achieving the vision and goals for sustainable, • Molly Hanson, Jefferson County Public Health transit-oriented communities that the Gold Line Corridor Working Group • Jenn Hillhouse, City & County of Denver – Public Works, Policy & Planning collectively identified. • Ken Johnstone, City of Wheat Ridge – Community Development • Don May, Adams County Housing Authority This report was created as part of the corridor implementation activities • Patrick McLaughlin, Regional Transportation District of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Sustainable • Kevin Nichols, City of Arvada – Community Development Communities Initiative (SCI). In 2011, the Denver region was • Sally Payne, City of Wheat Ridge – Planning and Housing Authority awarded $4.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban • Jessica Prosser, City of Arvada
    [Show full text]