DOCSLIB.ORG

Arvada, Colorado Advisory Services Panel Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arvada, Colorado Advisory Services Panel Report Arvada Colorado March 17–22, 2013 Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Arvada Colorado Healthy Places: Designing an Active Colorado March 17–22, 2013 Advisory Services Panel Report A ULI About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is n Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in and advisory efforts that address current and future creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. challenges. ULI is committed to Established in 1936, the Institute today has nearly 30,000 n Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum of estate and land use policy to exchange best practices the land use and develop ment disciplines. Professionals and serve community needs; represented include developers, builders, property own ers, investors, architects, public officials, plan­­ners, real estate n Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, financiers, membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem academicians, students, and librarians. solving; ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is n Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- through member involvement and information resources eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development; ­­de velopment prac­­tice. The Institute has long been rec- n Advancing land use policies and design practices ognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely that respect the uniqueness of both built and natural quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, environments; growth, and development. n Sharing knowledge through education, applied re- search, publishing, and electronic media; and © 2013 by the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20007-5201 All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copy- right holder is prohibited. 2 An Advisory Services Panel Report About ULI Advisory Services THE GOAL OF THE ULI Advisory Services pro gram is participants in ULI’s panel assignments are able to make to bring the finest expertise in the real estate field to bear accurate assessments of a sponsor’s issues and to provide on complex land use planning and development projects, recommendations in a compressed amount of time. programs, and policies. Since 1947, this program has A major strength of the program is ULI’s unique ability assembled well over 400 ULI-member teams to help to draw on the knowledge and expertise of its members, sponsors find creative, practical solutions for issues such including land developers and owners, public officials, as downtown redevelopment, land management strategies, academics, representatives of financial institutions, and evaluation of development potential, growth management, others. In fulfillment of the mission of the Urban Land community revitalization, brownfields redevelopment, Institute, this Advisory Services panel report is intended to military base reuse, provision of low-cost and affordable pro vide objective advice that will promote the re spon­­­sible housing, and asset management strategies, among other use of land to enhance the environment. matters. A wide variety of public, private, and nonprofit organizations have contracted for ULI’s advisory services. ULI Program Staff Gayle Berens Each panel team is composed of highly qualified profes- Senior Vice President, Education and Advisory Group sionals who volunteer their time to ULI. They are chosen Thomas W. Eitler for their knowledge of the panel topic and screened Vice President, Advisory Services to ensure their objectivity. ULI’s interdisciplinary panel Annie Finkenbinder-Best teams provide a holistic look at development problems. Director, Education and Advisory Group A re spected ULI member who has previous panel experi- Daniel Lobo ence chairs each panel. Manager, Awards and Publications The agenda for a panel assignment is in tensive. It includes Caroline Dietrich an in-depth briefing composed of a tour of the site Logistics Manager, Education and Advisory Group and meetings with spon­­­sor representatives; hour-long Leigh Franke interviews of key community representatives; and a day of Associate, Education and Advisory Group formulating recommendations. Long nights of discussion James A. Mulligan Managing Editor precede the panel’s conclusions. On the final day on site, the panel makes an oral presentation of its findings and Laura Glassman, Publications Professionals LLC Manuscript Editor conclusions to the sponsor. A written re port is pre pared and published. Betsy VanBuskirk Creative Director Because the sponsoring entities are responsible for signifi- Anne Morgan cant preparation before the panel’s vis it, including sending Graphic Design extensive briefing materials to each member and arranging Craig Chapman for the panel to meet with key local community members Senior Director, Publishing Operations and stakeholders in the project under consideration, Arvada, Colorado, March 17–22, 2013 3 Acknowledgments THE PANEL WISHES TO THANK the city of Arvada The panel wishes to thank the Colorado Health for acting as host to this important panel. The panel Foundation for sponsoring this series of panels thanks Mayor Marc Williams and the other members of regarding designing healthy communities, especially the City Council and the city staff for their cooperation, Anne Warhover, Khanh Nguyen, and Hillary Fulton. support, and guidance. Partners in this effort included The panel also thanks Progressive Urban Management the Arvada Sustainability Advisory Committee, the Associates for helping prepare the communities for Transportation Advisory Committee, the Arvada Planning the panel’s arrival, providing the background briefing Commission, the Arvada Urban Renewal Authority Board, materials, and coordinating so closely with ULI and the the Arvada Parks Advisory Committee, the Jefferson host cities for this very important work. County Health Department, Denver Urban Gardens, the Finally, the panel acknowledges and thanks the more Apex Park and Recreation District, Bike Colorado, Bike than 60 individuals who were interviewed. Representing Jefferson County, Carin’ Clinic, and Jefferson County Head city and county agencies, the business community, Start. The panel especially thanks Jessica Prosser whose and the citizenry, these stakeholders provided valuable preparations and attention to details on briefing documents information and perspectives through their passion and and on-site coordination made this panel possible. understanding of the issues, greatly aiding the panel in its analysis. Note to Readers This publication contains recommendations by the While the Colorado Health Foundation contracted Urban Land Institute Advisory Services panel that with ULI to conduct the Advisory Services panel, the convened in Arvada, Colorado, the week of March complete recommendations do not signify key funding 17 to 22, 2013. These recommendations constitute opportunities for or commitments by the Foundation. a comprehensive report of the Healthy Places: The ULI recommendations are intended to serve as an Designing an Active Colorado initiative for the expert guide for use by the community of Arvada as it community of Arvada. The Healthy Places initiative sets priorities based on local knowledge of needs and was designed to promote policies that incorporate opportunities. physical activity into land development and land use. 4 An Advisory Services Panel Report Contents ULI Panel and Project Staff .......................................................6 Background and the Panel’s Assignment .............................................7 Economic and Market Overview ..................................................10 Understanding and Designing a Healthy, Active Community ..............................13 Best Practices: Guidelines for Designing a Healthier Arvada ..............................16 Specific Site Recommendations ..................................................23 Programming for an Active Lifestyle ...............................................31 Financing ..................................................................36 Benchmarking, Communication, Engagement, and Implementation .........................39 Conclusion .................................................................42 About the Panel ..............................................................43 Arvada, Colorado, March 17–22, 2013 5 ULI Panel and Project Staff Panel Chair Ross Tilghman Director Edward McMahon Tilghman Group Senior Resident Fellow, Chair for Seattle, Washington Sustainable Development Waverly Wood Urban Land Institute Coordinator, Center for Design and Health Washington, D.C. University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Panel Members Tamara Zahn President Richard Albrecht Zahn Associates Principal Indianapolis, Indiana Lattice Properties LC Park City, Utah Suzanne Nienaber ULI Project Staff Director, Programs and Partnerships Thomas W. Eitler Center for Active Design Vice President, Advisory Services New York, New York Caroline Dietrich Klaus Philipsen Logistics Manager, Education and Advisory Group ArchPlan Inc. Baltimore, Maryland Alison Johnson Program Manager, Rose Center Bob Taunton Taunton Consulting Boise, Idaho 6 An Advisory Services Panel Report Background and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview
    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and FasTracks Overview RTD oversees a 47-mile rail transit system that services 46 stations on five corridors including: • The 5.3-mile Central Corridor and 1.8-mile Central Platte Valley (CPV) Spur in central Denver • The 8.7-mile Southwest Line to Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton • The 19.2-mile Southeast Line to Lone Tree and Aurora • The 12.1-mile West Line to Lakewood and Golden The FasTracks program, approved by district voters in a 2004 ballot initiative will: • add 122 miles of rail service • 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • approximately 60 new stations along six new corridors • extend three existing light rail lines image courtesy Gensler Grand Opening / image courtesy RTD Construction cranes dominated the skyline in RTD and TOD STAMPs Underway STAMPs Kicking Off 2013, as the result of an apartment boom in in 2014 the metro area. Development in 2013 centered Transit-oriented development is typically on the hub of the FasTracks program: Denver higher density and incorporates a mixture C-470/Lucent Station I-25/Broadway Station Area Master Plan Area Master Plan Union Station which is scheduled to open in of different uses that generate transit rider- spring 2014. Significant development has also ship. Multiple TODs contribute to creating 104th Ave. Station TOD Fitzsimons Parkway occurred around other existing and future transit-oriented communities where people Master Planning Study Station Area Master Plan stations as construction of FasTracks corridors can live, work, reduce transportation costs, continues at a rapid pace. and improve overall health through increased 88th Avenue Station Civic Center Station muli-modal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan
    Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan June 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................4 1.1 Background and Focus ..........................................................................4 1.2 Study Area .........................................................................................4 1.3 Relevant Studies ..................................................................................7 2 Existing Conditions................................................................................... 15 2.1 Market Assessment ............................................................................ 15 2.2 Existing Market Conditions .................................................................. 16 3 Service Evaluation.................................................................................... 26 3.1 Service Fundamentals for Transit Design................................................ 26 4 Existing Service Conditions........................................................................ 28 4.1 Transit Route Network ........................................................................ 28 5 Gold and Northwest Corridor Service Plan.................................................... 42 5.1 Gold and Northwest Bus Service Recommendations ................................ 46 5.2 Resource Impacts............................................................................... 50 6 Process .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thornton Crossroads at 104Th Station Area Master Plan
    January 13, 2015 Acknowledgments The Project Team would like to thank and acknowledge the significant contributions of the members of this plan’s Project Management Team and Technical Advisory Committee, who provided valuable guidance and vision throughout the course of the planning process. We would also like to thank attendees who participated in the Developer Forum on June 25, 2014. Mayor and City Council Members Mayor Heidi K. Williams Ward I Jenice “JJ” Dove Mack Goodman Ward II Eric Montoya Val Vigil, Mayor Pro Tem Ward III Beth Martinez Humenik Sam Nizam Ward IV Eric Tade Jan Kulmann City of Thornton Project Management Team Jack Ethredge City Manager Jeff Coder, AICP Deputy City Manager, City Development Glenda Lainis, AICP Policy Planning Manager Robert Larsen, AICP Senior Planner Technical Advisory Committe Pete Brezall City of Thornton Dante Carbone City of Thornton Tyler Dunn City of Thornton Buz Hedglin City of Thornton Mark Heller, AICP, JD City of Thornton Lori Hight, AICP City of Thornton Julie Jacoby City of Thornton Nicole Jeffers City of Thornton Jim Kaiser, P.E. City of Thornton Heath Klein, P.E. City of Thornton Adam Krueger City of Thornton Karen Widomski City of Thornton Mike Mallon, AICP City of Thornton Chad McCollum , P.E. City of Thornton Allison Moe City of Thornton Martin Postma, CEcD City of Thornton Gene Putman, P.E., PTOE City of Thornton Paula Schulte City of Thornton Alan Sielaff City of Thornton Deb Turner, P.E. City of Thornton Diane VanFossen City of Thornton Lee Vitgenos City of Thornton Rebecca Smith,
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: a Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line
    Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: A Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line June 2014 Gold Line Corridor Working Group Members (in alphabetical order): About This Report • Steve Art, City of Wheat Ridge – Economic Development This report documents existing conditions and planning efforts along the • Chris Auxier, Adams County Housing Authority • Michelle Claymore, Jefferson County Economic Development Gold Line Corridor as of December 2013. It also identifies opportunities • Alan Feinstein, Jefferson County Housing Authority and challenges to implementing the visions of these plans, and provides • Joelle Greenland, Adams County – Planning recommendations for achieving the vision and goals for sustainable, • Molly Hanson, Jefferson County Public Health transit-oriented communities that the Gold Line Corridor Working Group • Jenn Hillhouse, City & County of Denver – Public Works, Policy & Planning collectively identified. • Ken Johnstone, City of Wheat Ridge – Community Development • Don May, Adams County Housing Authority This report was created as part of the corridor implementation activities • Patrick McLaughlin, Regional Transportation District of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Sustainable • Kevin Nichols, City of Arvada – Community Development Communities Initiative (SCI). In 2011, the Denver region was • Sally Payne, City of Wheat Ridge – Planning and Housing Authority awarded $4.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban • Jessica Prosser, City of Arvada
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision
    RECORD OF DECISION Gold Line Corridor Project Denver, Arvada, Wheat Ridge, Adams County, Jefferson County, Colorado November 2009 Table of Contents Section Page Decision .......................................................................................................................... 5 Basis for Decision ........................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 Alternatives Considered .................................................................................................. 6 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................. 7 Baseline Alternative ............................................................................................... 7 Preferred Alternative .............................................................................................. 8 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts from the Preferred Alternative ......................... 11 Public Opportunity to Comment..................................................................................... 12 Comments and Responses During the NEPA Process ........................................ 13 Determinations and Findings ......................................................................................... 15 Changes from the Final Environmental Impact Statement ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Existing Transit Infrastructure for Equitable Vaccine Distribution Luna Hoopes Advanced Geospatial Methods Spring 2021 Client: Mile High Connects
    Leveraging Existing Transit Infrastructure for Equitable Vaccine Distribution Luna Hoopes Advanced Geospatial Methods Spring 2021 Client: Mile High Connects PAGE 1 BACKGROUND Mile High Connects is a Denver-based non-profit organization that aims to increase access to housing choices, good jobs, quality schools and essential services via public transit in the Denver Metro region. COVID Check Colorado launched in May 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and has provided COVID-19 testing. The organization is now working to ensure provision of COVID-19 vaccines to all Colorado residents. When the COVID-19 pandemic began, Mile High Connects engaged with COVID Check Colorado to identify areas of inequity around COVID-related services, primarily testing and vaccines. Because Mile High Connects prioritizes vulnerable populations who often rely on public transit, they are pursuing a partnership with the Regional Transportation District (RTD), in which RTD would provide the land and infrastructure for semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites in underserved areas. After review of existing RTD facilities and in conjunction with the client, it was determined that RTD Park-n-Ride locations are suited for semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites because of their established infrastructure such as protected areas, utility connections, and existing waste management services. The study area for this analysis is the RTD service area (see Figure 1). By responding to the following research question, this analysis is intended to help initiate a conversation between Mile High Connects and RTD to explore how RTD can provide resources in the vaccination effort. RESEARCH QUESTION Which RTD Park-n-Ride locations are eligible for installation of semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites? Eligibility is based on the lack of existing vaccine distribution sites in Park-n-Ride walksheds with a 20-minute walking time (1600 meters).
    [Show full text]
  • TOD 2009V4.Indd
    Transit-Oriented Development Status Report 2009 December 2009 This is a controlled document; please do not dupli- cate. If additional copies are required, please request them from the FasTracks Document Control. This will assure that all recipients of the document receive revisions and additions. Approved By: Bill Van Meter, Acting Assistant General Manager Planning December 2009 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 REPORT OVERVIEW ............................................................ 1-1 1.1 RTD and FasTracks Overview ..................................................................1-1 1.2 RTD and TOD ........................................................................................1-3 1.3 Report Format .......................................................................................1-4 2.0 SUMMARY OF TOD RELATED ACTIVITY ............................... 2-1 2.2 Planning, Zoning and Other Activity .........................................................2-2 3.0 DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW .................................................. 3-1 3.1 Local TOD Developer Survey ...................................................................3-1 3.2 Regional TOD Trends ..............................................................................3-3 3.3 Perspectives on 2010 and Beyond ...........................................................3-5 4.0 CORRIDOR SUMMARIES ...................................................... 4-1 4.1 Central Corridor, Central Platte Valley Spur, Central Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • East Rail Line
    Design Build Institute of America Alternative Delivery Methods at RTD North Metro & Eagle Update May 2, 2014 Monday, May 12, 14 FasTracks Status • West Rail Line (W Line)—First FasTracks line to open—April 2013, 8 months ahead of schedule • Denver Union Station—transit improvements 99% complete • East/Gold/Northwest Rail Lines (EAGLE) —54% complete • I-225 Line—25% in construction progress; 80% in design progress • U.S. 36 BRT—Phase 1 of managed lanes 60% complete • North Metro Line - Groundbreaking March 20, design underway • Southeast Rail Extension: 65% advanced basic engineering complete 2 Monday, May 12, 14 FasTracks Construction • Over $5 billion in construction Courtesy of HDR, Inc, © 2013, Keith Philpott either complete or under contract • One of the largest transit construction program in the country • DUS opening May 9, 2014 • Other corridors through 2016 • North Metro 2018 Monday, May 12, 14 Eagle P3 Project • East Rail Line, Gold Line, a segment of Northwest Rail (to south Westminster) and Commuter Rail Maintenance Facility • Project Funding—$2.2 billion – $1.03 billion funded by federal grant; $450 million capital cost/private financing • Opening in 2016 4 Monday, May 12, 14 East Rail Line • Connects downtown Denver to • 22.8 miles commuter rail DIA via Aurora • Electric Rail Cars • Complete in 2016 5 Monday, May 12, 14 Tierney, Brenda 4/8/14 dateCompleted of caption is incorrect. Construction •231 utility relocations, including work at Smith Road and Monaco Street Parkway in Denver •Girder placement over Airport Boulevard for the I-70 Flyover Bridge in Aurora •Bridge construction at the DIA employee parking lot •Track installation along 78th Avenue near DIA in Denver •Rail panel installation at Havana Construction of the commuter rail maintenance facility, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Part a V6.3 Arvada TOD.Indd
    Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Plan for the Sheridan Boulevard, Olde Town Arvada, and Arvada Ridge Transit Oriented Development Sites Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Arvada Charlier Associates, Inc. Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services Department www.charlier.org December 1, 2009 (720) 898-7400 (303) 543-7277 Contents Plan Purpose and Intent . 1 Chapter summarizing the need for this plan, its intended outcomes, and the planning process undertaken. Discusses criti cal diff erences between walking and bicycling to create an understanding of the specifi c facility recommendati ons that follow. Stati on Access Plans. 9 Detailed recommendati ons for both bicycling and walking within a half-mile planning radius from each of the three Gold Line stati ons: Arvada Ridge Stati on Access Plan . p. 10 Olde Town Stati on Access Plan . p. 15 Sheridan Ridge Stati on Access Plan . p. 21 Citywide System Connecti ons . 25 Map and corridor descripti ons showing how the three stati on plans connect together and link to the City of Arvada Major Bicycle and Trails Corridor Plan in the southeastern part of the community. Map of Primary Bicycle Corridors and Missing Links . p. 26 Spot Improvements . 31 Specifi c roadway intersecti on modifi cati ons and trail connecti ons that are desired to ensure seamless and convenient travel across the system. Bicycle/Pedestrian Retrofi t Recommendati ons . 35 Recommended modifi cati ons to retrofi t current roadway cross-secti ons to create complete streets that encourage bicycling and walking. Pedestrian Environments . 61 Policies for pedestrian supporti ve design and recommended modifi cati ons to retrofi t current roadway cross-secti ons to create complete streets that encourage walking.
    [Show full text]
  • 5551 Allison St 8150 Reno Dr & 5480 Balsam St 06172021 V2
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 5551 ALLISON ST, 8150 RENO DR & 5480 BALSAM ST ARVADA, CO 80007 TRAVIS HODGE ANTHONY BOBAY TRINA BURTON Senior Advisor Investment Sales Advisor Broker Associate Sierra Vista Realty, LLC [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 404.259.8171 720.297.6667 720.209.9002 | 720.772.7171 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPERTY OVERVIEW LOCATION OVERVIEW APPENDIX PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Located in Qualified Opportunity Zone with Medium-High density residential zoning (24 units/acre). Less than 1/2 mile to Olde Town Arvada shops, restaurants, and commuter rail station. Sits on top of hill with incredible views facing south and west. Exempted from School Land Dedication/Fee-In-Lieu due to proximity to rail. 80002 zip code home values: 16.3% increase in the past year; 8.0% increase forecasted over next 12 months. SITE OVERVIEW SITE OVERVIEW ADDRESS 5551 ALLISON ST, 8150 RENO DR & 5480 BALSAM ST CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE ARVADA, CO 80002 PARCEL ID 3914206032, 3914206031, 3914206030 COUNTY JEFFERSON ZONING MUNICIPALITY CITY OF ARVADA ZONING R24 PARCEL SIZE (SF) 91,012 SF PARCEL SIZE (AC): 2.09 ACRES MAX HEIGHT (FT): 35' ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION: NO KNOWN CONDITIONS FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: NONE MILL LEVY: 96.499 LIST PRICE: TBD BY MARKET LOCATION OVERVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION The citizens of Arvada, CO have a great deal of pride in their city. Located just northwest of Denver, Arvada is a community unlike many others. Arvada consistently competes with the larger metropolitan areas in the areas of business and commerce but retains a small-town charm that other suburbs can’t replicate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ralston Corridor Report
    Ralston Road Corridor Plan April 2011 Ralston Road Corridor Plan Produced for: City of Arvada Produced by: Charlier Associates, Inc. with... Nelson/Nygaard Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Winston Associates Final Draft: April 2011 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ES-1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION . 1 Project Origin and Vision . 1 Stakeholder Involvement Overview . 2 Technical and Citi zens Advisory Committ ees . 2 Stakeholder Coff ees and Interviews. 3 The Great 8 . 3 Report Elements. 5 CHAPTER 2 - CURRENT AND FUTURE CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENT . 6 Corridor Overview . 6 Land Use Summary . 7 Pedestrian Environment . 8 Transit Service. 9 Motor Vehicles . .10 Public Workshop #1 . .14 CHAPTER 3 - CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT . .15 Long Range Corridor Objecti ves . .15 Corridor Concepts . .16 Land Use . .16 Transportati on . .17 Public Workshop #2 . .22 Cross Secti ons. .22 CHAPTER 4 - CONCEPT EVALUATION . 29 Evaluati on Criteria . .29 Fatal Flaw Outcomes . .29 Final Four Street Cross Secti ons . .31 Pedestrian Environment Approach . .34 Bicycle Approach . .34 Transit Opti ons . .34 Concept Evaluati on . .38 Streetcar Feasibility . .43 Third Public Outreach . .46 CONTENTS CHAPTER 5 - PREFERRED CONCEPT . 47 Process Review . .47 Overview of Preferred Concept . .47 Land Use . .48 Flexibility . .49 Pedestrian Environment . .51 Access Management . .54 Wide Landscaped Median. .56 Improved Connecti vity . .57 Bicycle Accommodati on . .58 Transit . .58 Project Cost Summary . .60 Implementati on Plan . .61 APPENDIX I - COMMITTEES . A-1 APPENDIX II - KEYPAD POLLING . A-2 APPENDIX III - CURRENT CONDITIONS (TRANSIT) . A-6 APPENDIX IV - CURRENT CONDITIONS (TRAFFIC). A-8 APPENDIX V - CONCEPT EVALUATION DATA . A-11 APPENDIX VI - SURVEY RESULTS. A-22 APPENDIX VII - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. A-27 APPENDIX VIII - STREETCAR FEASIBILITY .
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Corridor Economic Development and Community Services Strategy
    Final Report Gold Line Corridor Economic Development and Community Services Strategy Prepared for: Gold Line Corridor Working Group and Denver Regional Council of Governments Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. with ArLand Land Use Economics and Ordonez and Vogelsang, LLC January 16, 2015 EPS #143020 Table of Contents 1. GOLD LINE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Vision and Goals ....................................................................................................... 1 Gold Line Corridor Strengths and Weaknesses .............................................................. 2 Corridor Market Potentials .......................................................................................... 3 2. CORRIDOR-WIDE STRATEGIES .................................................................................. 6 Complete Transit Corridor .......................................................................................... 6 Corridor-wide Collaboration ........................................................................................ 8 3. STATION AREA ACTION PLANS ................................................................................ 12 41st and Fox ........................................................................................................... 12 Pecos Junction .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]