DOCSLIB.ORG

Northwest Subarea Plan Update Adopted October 2013 | Originally Adopted June 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northwest Subarea Plan Update Adopted October 2013 | Originally Adopted June 2006 N NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN Update Adopted October 2013 | Originally Adopted June 2006 NORTHWESTW SUBAREA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2013 UPDATE City of Wheat Ridge City Council The City of Wheat Ridge would like to thank the numerous residents, property Mayor Jerry DiTullio owners, and business owners who participated in planning meetings for the District I William Starker Davis Reinhart update of the Northwest Subarea Plan. District II Joyce Jay Kristi Davis District III Mike Stites George Pond District IV Joseph DeMott Tracy Langworthy City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission District I Anne Brinkman Alan Bucknam District II Steve Timms Scott Ohm District III Richard Matthews Amanda Weaver District IV Monica Duran Tracy Guildner City of Wheat Ridge Staff Patrick Goff, City Manager Community Development Department Public Works Department Kenneth Johnstone Scott Brink Sally Payne Steve Nguyen Meredith Reckert Mark Westberg Sarah Showalter Lauren Mikulak Parks and Recreation Department Wade Sanner Joyce Manwaring Economic Development Steve Art N NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN 1 W TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 | Introduction 5 Chapter 2 | Planning Process 10 Chapter 3 | Existing Conditions 12 Chapter 4 | Future Subarea Character 18 Chapter 5 | Future Land Use 20 Chapter 6 | Future Transportation 24 Chapter 7 | Infrastructure and Amenities 27 Chapter 8 | Economic Development 30 Chapter 9 | Implementation 32 2 NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN N W TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 | Northwest Subarea Boundaries 6 Figure 2 | Gold Line Map 7 Figure 3 | RTD Station Design 9 Figure 4 | Existing Land Use 15 Figure 5 | Existing Zoning 16 Figure 6 | Existing Transportation 17 Figure 7 | Future Land Use 21 Figure 8 | Proposed Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation 26 N NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN 3 W This page intentionally left blank 4 NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN N W CHAPTER 1 | INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Northwest Subarea Plan is to establish a vision that will guide future RTD Station Design development around the Ward Road commuter rail station in Wheat Ridge. As part of As mentioned above, the final Gold Line alignment was established through RTD’s the FasTracks Program, the Regional Transportation District (RTD) will build the Gold completion of the EIS process in 2009. Shortly thereafter, RTD worked to refine the Line, an 11.2-mile electric commuter rail transit line connecting Wheat Ridge to Union design for each station along the Gold Line. In 2011, the City of Wheat Ridge and Station in downtown Denver. The end-of-line station will be Ward Road Station, located RTD executed an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) that included parameters for the near Ward Road and W. 50th Place in the northwest corner of the city. Riders will be Ward Road Station design. As part of the IGA, RTD committed to construct a variety of able to travel between Ward Road Station and Union Station in 25 minutes, creating improvements with the transit station, including: the opportunity to attract not only commuters, but also reverse commuters coming from downtown Denver to Wheat Ridge. RTD started construction on the Gold Line in 2012 • A newly-constructed intersection at Tabor Street and Ridge Road connecting and it is expected to open in 2016. The area that is covered by the Northwest Subarea with W. 50th Place and creating a through east-west route to station. Plan is generally bounded by W. 52nd Avenue to the north, Tabor Street to the east, • The extension of W. 50th Place east to connect to the station and to the newly- Interstate-70 to the south, and Ward Road to the west. Figure 1 shows the location and constructed intersection of Ridge Road and Tabor Street. The new portion of boundaries of the subarea. 50th Place will include detached sidewalks, on-street parking, and bike lanes. • The extension of Taft Court, south of W. 52nd Avenue, to intersect with W. 50th 2006 PLAN Place. The new Taft Court will include detached sidewalks and on-street parking. In 2006, the City of Wheat Ridge adopted the Northwest Subarea Plan. The plan • A surface parking lot with just under 290 parking spaces which may be expanded called for mixed use, pedestrian-friendly development - often called transit-oriented after opening day based on levels of parking utilization. development (TOD) - to be developed over time around Ward Road Station. It set goals and policies related to land use, urban design, and infrastructure to achieve that vision. Envision Wheat Ridge The City of Wheat Ridge adopted a new comprehensive plan, Envision Wheat Ridge, One purpose of the 2006 plan was to inform the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in 2009. Envision Wheat Ridge establishes the Northwest Subarea as one of five that RTD would be required to complete prior to the Gold Line’s construction. The EIS priority redevelopment areas in the City. It reinforces the vision established in the 2006 process occurred from 2007 to 2009. The process, which involved stakeholder input subarea plan for higher density, mixed use development around the transit station. along the entire Gold Line, analyzed a variety of alternatives and eventually determined It refined that vision, however, by calling for a focus on employment-supporting land a final alignment for the Gold Line corridor, including all eight station locations in Denver, uses in the area. Envision Wheat Ridge also calls for the development of mixed use Adams County, Arvada, and Wheat Ridge. zoning that supports transit-oriented development (TOD), including design standards, to promote quality development in the Northwest Subarea. 2013 UPDATE The Northwest Subarea Plan is adopted as an amendment to Envision Wheat Ridge. Many milestones have been reached since the original adoption of the Northwest Subarea Plan, so in 2013 the City initiated an update to incorporate important changes and to bring the plan document up-to-date. The purpose of this update is not to revisit Urban Renewal Designation and City Charter Exemption the overall vision and major policy goals established in the 2006 plan. Instead, the In 2009, the entire Northwest Subarea became part of the I-70/Kipling Corridors Urban updated plan furthers the original vision for transit-oriented development by refining Renewal Area. Renewal Wheat Ridge, the City’s urban renewal authority, adopted the and clarifying the goals and strategies to realize that vision. The following is a summary I-70/Kipling Corridors Plan in May 2009. The formation of the urban renewal area is of major milestones, plans, and policies that have been incorporated into the 2013 plan. significant because it enables the use of certain financing tools, such as tax increment N NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN INTRODUCTION 5 W FIGURE 1 | NORTHWEST SUBAREA BOUNDARIES 53RD AVE YANK WAY YANK YANK WAY YANK VIVIAN ST VIVIAN ST UNION CTUNION CT CT CT TAFT TAFT ST ST TABOR TABOR XENON ST Arvada 52ND AVE 52ND AVE QUAIL ST QUAIL QUAIL ST QUAIL SIMMS PL SWADLEY ST SWADLEY RIDGE RD Jefferson 50TH PL County WARD RD WARD WARD RD WARD 49TH PL TABOR ST TABOR TABOR ST TABOR 49TH AVE 49TH AVE PARFET ST PARFET ROBB ST ROBB ST VAN GORDON ST VAN I-70 FRONTAGE RD N I-70 FRONTAGE RDI-70 N Ward Road Station 47TH AVE Gold Line City Boundaries 46TH PL NW Subarea SIMMS ST SIMMS ST ROBB ST ROBB ST TABOR ST TABOR TABOR ST TABOR The Northwest Subarea is generally bounded by W. 52nd Avenue, Tabor Street, Interstate-70, and Ward Road. The boundary has been modified slightly since the 2006 plan was adopted: the established residential neighborhood to the northeast is removed and the area west of Tabor Street, south of Ridge Road is added. 6 INTRODUCTION NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN N W FIGURE 2 | GOLD LINE MAP This map, provided by RTD, illustrates the Gold Line in relation to other FasTracks transit lines. Ward Road Station is the end-of-line station for the Gold Line. N NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN INTRODUCTION 7 W financing (TIF), that could help to fund future development and/or infrastructure It requires that all new streets serving commercial or mixed-use development have improvements in the subarea. a minimum 8-foot wide detached sidewalk with minimum 6-foot wide amenity zone. All new streets serving residential development must include a minimum 6-foot wide Shortly after the formation of the urban renewal area, Wheat Ridge voters exempted detached sidewalk and 6-foot amenity zone. The manual also includes guidelines for the I-70/Kipling urban renewal area from the height and density restrictions in the City benches, pedestrian lights, and plant material within the amenity zone. Charter. When the original Northwest Subarea Plan was adopted in 2006, the subarea was subject to restrictions in the charter that limit development to 50 feet in height EPA Smart Growth Implementation Grant for commercial buildings, 35 feet for buildings with residential use, and a maximum The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Sustainable Communities residential density of 21 units per acre. These restrictions no longer apply to the offers communities assistance in implementing smart growth through its Smart Growth subarea, which creates new opportunity for the mixed-use, higher-density development Implementation Assistance (SGIA) program. The City of Wheat Ridge was selected that is common to TOD. for this implementation assistance program in 2010-2011. The SGIA team developed recommendations for financing infrastructure improvements needed in the Northwest Mixed Use Zoning Subarea, including new streets, stormwater facilities, and structured parking. The 2006 Northwest Subarea Plan, along with Envision Wheat Ridge, recognized the need for zoning that would encourage the type of urban, mixed-use development The final report produced by EPA recommends that Wheat Ridge prioritize stormwater envisioned for the station area. In 2010, the City adopted four new mixed use zoning and street improvements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview
    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and FasTracks Overview RTD oversees a 47-mile rail transit system that services 46 stations on five corridors including: • The 5.3-mile Central Corridor and 1.8-mile Central Platte Valley (CPV) Spur in central Denver • The 8.7-mile Southwest Line to Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton • The 19.2-mile Southeast Line to Lone Tree and Aurora • The 12.1-mile West Line to Lakewood and Golden The FasTracks program, approved by district voters in a 2004 ballot initiative will: • add 122 miles of rail service • 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • approximately 60 new stations along six new corridors • extend three existing light rail lines image courtesy Gensler Grand Opening / image courtesy RTD Construction cranes dominated the skyline in RTD and TOD STAMPs Underway STAMPs Kicking Off 2013, as the result of an apartment boom in in 2014 the metro area. Development in 2013 centered Transit-oriented development is typically on the hub of the FasTracks program: Denver higher density and incorporates a mixture C-470/Lucent Station I-25/Broadway Station Area Master Plan Area Master Plan Union Station which is scheduled to open in of different uses that generate transit rider- spring 2014. Significant development has also ship. Multiple TODs contribute to creating 104th Ave. Station TOD Fitzsimons Parkway occurred around other existing and future transit-oriented communities where people Master Planning Study Station Area Master Plan stations as construction of FasTracks corridors can live, work, reduce transportation costs, continues at a rapid pace. and improve overall health through increased 88th Avenue Station Civic Center Station muli-modal activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan
    Preliminary Gold & Northwest Corridors Service Plan June 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................4 1.1 Background and Focus ..........................................................................4 1.2 Study Area .........................................................................................4 1.3 Relevant Studies ..................................................................................7 2 Existing Conditions................................................................................... 15 2.1 Market Assessment ............................................................................ 15 2.2 Existing Market Conditions .................................................................. 16 3 Service Evaluation.................................................................................... 26 3.1 Service Fundamentals for Transit Design................................................ 26 4 Existing Service Conditions........................................................................ 28 4.1 Transit Route Network ........................................................................ 28 5 Gold and Northwest Corridor Service Plan.................................................... 42 5.1 Gold and Northwest Bus Service Recommendations ................................ 46 5.2 Resource Impacts............................................................................... 50 6 Process .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thornton Crossroads at 104Th Station Area Master Plan
    January 13, 2015 Acknowledgments The Project Team would like to thank and acknowledge the significant contributions of the members of this plan’s Project Management Team and Technical Advisory Committee, who provided valuable guidance and vision throughout the course of the planning process. We would also like to thank attendees who participated in the Developer Forum on June 25, 2014. Mayor and City Council Members Mayor Heidi K. Williams Ward I Jenice “JJ” Dove Mack Goodman Ward II Eric Montoya Val Vigil, Mayor Pro Tem Ward III Beth Martinez Humenik Sam Nizam Ward IV Eric Tade Jan Kulmann City of Thornton Project Management Team Jack Ethredge City Manager Jeff Coder, AICP Deputy City Manager, City Development Glenda Lainis, AICP Policy Planning Manager Robert Larsen, AICP Senior Planner Technical Advisory Committe Pete Brezall City of Thornton Dante Carbone City of Thornton Tyler Dunn City of Thornton Buz Hedglin City of Thornton Mark Heller, AICP, JD City of Thornton Lori Hight, AICP City of Thornton Julie Jacoby City of Thornton Nicole Jeffers City of Thornton Jim Kaiser, P.E. City of Thornton Heath Klein, P.E. City of Thornton Adam Krueger City of Thornton Karen Widomski City of Thornton Mike Mallon, AICP City of Thornton Chad McCollum , P.E. City of Thornton Allison Moe City of Thornton Martin Postma, CEcD City of Thornton Gene Putman, P.E., PTOE City of Thornton Paula Schulte City of Thornton Alan Sielaff City of Thornton Deb Turner, P.E. City of Thornton Diane VanFossen City of Thornton Lee Vitgenos City of Thornton Rebecca Smith,
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: a Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line
    Gold Line Corridor Profile and Recommendations Report: A Guide to Implementing Sustainable Communities Along the Gold Line June 2014 Gold Line Corridor Working Group Members (in alphabetical order): About This Report • Steve Art, City of Wheat Ridge – Economic Development This report documents existing conditions and planning efforts along the • Chris Auxier, Adams County Housing Authority • Michelle Claymore, Jefferson County Economic Development Gold Line Corridor as of December 2013. It also identifies opportunities • Alan Feinstein, Jefferson County Housing Authority and challenges to implementing the visions of these plans, and provides • Joelle Greenland, Adams County – Planning recommendations for achieving the vision and goals for sustainable, • Molly Hanson, Jefferson County Public Health transit-oriented communities that the Gold Line Corridor Working Group • Jenn Hillhouse, City & County of Denver – Public Works, Policy & Planning collectively identified. • Ken Johnstone, City of Wheat Ridge – Community Development • Don May, Adams County Housing Authority This report was created as part of the corridor implementation activities • Patrick McLaughlin, Regional Transportation District of the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) Sustainable • Kevin Nichols, City of Arvada – Community Development Communities Initiative (SCI). In 2011, the Denver region was • Sally Payne, City of Wheat Ridge – Planning and Housing Authority awarded $4.5 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban • Jessica Prosser, City of Arvada
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision
    RECORD OF DECISION Gold Line Corridor Project Denver, Arvada, Wheat Ridge, Adams County, Jefferson County, Colorado November 2009 Table of Contents Section Page Decision .......................................................................................................................... 5 Basis for Decision ........................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 Alternatives Considered .................................................................................................. 6 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................. 7 Baseline Alternative ............................................................................................... 7 Preferred Alternative .............................................................................................. 8 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts from the Preferred Alternative ......................... 11 Public Opportunity to Comment..................................................................................... 12 Comments and Responses During the NEPA Process ........................................ 13 Determinations and Findings ......................................................................................... 15 Changes from the Final Environmental Impact Statement ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Existing Transit Infrastructure for Equitable Vaccine Distribution Luna Hoopes Advanced Geospatial Methods Spring 2021 Client: Mile High Connects
    Leveraging Existing Transit Infrastructure for Equitable Vaccine Distribution Luna Hoopes Advanced Geospatial Methods Spring 2021 Client: Mile High Connects PAGE 1 BACKGROUND Mile High Connects is a Denver-based non-profit organization that aims to increase access to housing choices, good jobs, quality schools and essential services via public transit in the Denver Metro region. COVID Check Colorado launched in May 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and has provided COVID-19 testing. The organization is now working to ensure provision of COVID-19 vaccines to all Colorado residents. When the COVID-19 pandemic began, Mile High Connects engaged with COVID Check Colorado to identify areas of inequity around COVID-related services, primarily testing and vaccines. Because Mile High Connects prioritizes vulnerable populations who often rely on public transit, they are pursuing a partnership with the Regional Transportation District (RTD), in which RTD would provide the land and infrastructure for semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites in underserved areas. After review of existing RTD facilities and in conjunction with the client, it was determined that RTD Park-n-Ride locations are suited for semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites because of their established infrastructure such as protected areas, utility connections, and existing waste management services. The study area for this analysis is the RTD service area (see Figure 1). By responding to the following research question, this analysis is intended to help initiate a conversation between Mile High Connects and RTD to explore how RTD can provide resources in the vaccination effort. RESEARCH QUESTION Which RTD Park-n-Ride locations are eligible for installation of semi-permanent vaccine distribution sites? Eligibility is based on the lack of existing vaccine distribution sites in Park-n-Ride walksheds with a 20-minute walking time (1600 meters).
    [Show full text]
  • Arvada, Colorado Advisory Services Panel Report
    Arvada Colorado March 17–22, 2013 Advisory ServicesReport Panel A ULI Arvada Colorado Healthy Places: Designing an Active Colorado March 17–22, 2013 Advisory Services Panel Report A ULI About the Urban Land Institute THE MISSION OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE is n Sustaining a diverse global network of local practice to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in and advisory efforts that address current and future creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. challenges. ULI is committed to Established in 1936, the Institute today has nearly 30,000 n Bringing together leaders from across the fields of real members worldwide, representing the entire spectrum of estate and land use policy to exchange best practices the land use and develop ment disciplines. Professionals and serve community needs; represented include developers, builders, property own ers, investors, architects, public officials, plan­­ners, real estate n Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, financiers, membership through mentoring, dialogue, and problem academicians, students, and librarians. solving; ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is n Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, regen- through member involvement and information resources eration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development; ­­de velopment prac­­tice. The Institute has long been rec- n Advancing land use policies and design practices ognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely that respect the uniqueness of both built and natural quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, environments; growth, and development.
    [Show full text]
  • TOD 2009V4.Indd
    Transit-Oriented Development Status Report 2009 December 2009 This is a controlled document; please do not dupli- cate. If additional copies are required, please request them from the FasTracks Document Control. This will assure that all recipients of the document receive revisions and additions. Approved By: Bill Van Meter, Acting Assistant General Manager Planning December 2009 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 REPORT OVERVIEW ............................................................ 1-1 1.1 RTD and FasTracks Overview ..................................................................1-1 1.2 RTD and TOD ........................................................................................1-3 1.3 Report Format .......................................................................................1-4 2.0 SUMMARY OF TOD RELATED ACTIVITY ............................... 2-1 2.2 Planning, Zoning and Other Activity .........................................................2-2 3.0 DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW .................................................. 3-1 3.1 Local TOD Developer Survey ...................................................................3-1 3.2 Regional TOD Trends ..............................................................................3-3 3.3 Perspectives on 2010 and Beyond ...........................................................3-5 4.0 CORRIDOR SUMMARIES ...................................................... 4-1 4.1 Central Corridor, Central Platte Valley Spur, Central Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • East Rail Line
    Design Build Institute of America Alternative Delivery Methods at RTD North Metro & Eagle Update May 2, 2014 Monday, May 12, 14 FasTracks Status • West Rail Line (W Line)—First FasTracks line to open—April 2013, 8 months ahead of schedule • Denver Union Station—transit improvements 99% complete • East/Gold/Northwest Rail Lines (EAGLE) —54% complete • I-225 Line—25% in construction progress; 80% in design progress • U.S. 36 BRT—Phase 1 of managed lanes 60% complete • North Metro Line - Groundbreaking March 20, design underway • Southeast Rail Extension: 65% advanced basic engineering complete 2 Monday, May 12, 14 FasTracks Construction • Over $5 billion in construction Courtesy of HDR, Inc, © 2013, Keith Philpott either complete or under contract • One of the largest transit construction program in the country • DUS opening May 9, 2014 • Other corridors through 2016 • North Metro 2018 Monday, May 12, 14 Eagle P3 Project • East Rail Line, Gold Line, a segment of Northwest Rail (to south Westminster) and Commuter Rail Maintenance Facility • Project Funding—$2.2 billion – $1.03 billion funded by federal grant; $450 million capital cost/private financing • Opening in 2016 4 Monday, May 12, 14 East Rail Line • Connects downtown Denver to • 22.8 miles commuter rail DIA via Aurora • Electric Rail Cars • Complete in 2016 5 Monday, May 12, 14 Tierney, Brenda 4/8/14 dateCompleted of caption is incorrect. Construction •231 utility relocations, including work at Smith Road and Monaco Street Parkway in Denver •Girder placement over Airport Boulevard for the I-70 Flyover Bridge in Aurora •Bridge construction at the DIA employee parking lot •Track installation along 78th Avenue near DIA in Denver •Rail panel installation at Havana Construction of the commuter rail maintenance facility, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Part a V6.3 Arvada TOD.Indd
    Pedestrian and Bicycle Access Plan for the Sheridan Boulevard, Olde Town Arvada, and Arvada Ridge Transit Oriented Development Sites Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Arvada Charlier Associates, Inc. Parks, Golf and Hospitality Services Department www.charlier.org December 1, 2009 (720) 898-7400 (303) 543-7277 Contents Plan Purpose and Intent . 1 Chapter summarizing the need for this plan, its intended outcomes, and the planning process undertaken. Discusses criti cal diff erences between walking and bicycling to create an understanding of the specifi c facility recommendati ons that follow. Stati on Access Plans. 9 Detailed recommendati ons for both bicycling and walking within a half-mile planning radius from each of the three Gold Line stati ons: Arvada Ridge Stati on Access Plan . p. 10 Olde Town Stati on Access Plan . p. 15 Sheridan Ridge Stati on Access Plan . p. 21 Citywide System Connecti ons . 25 Map and corridor descripti ons showing how the three stati on plans connect together and link to the City of Arvada Major Bicycle and Trails Corridor Plan in the southeastern part of the community. Map of Primary Bicycle Corridors and Missing Links . p. 26 Spot Improvements . 31 Specifi c roadway intersecti on modifi cati ons and trail connecti ons that are desired to ensure seamless and convenient travel across the system. Bicycle/Pedestrian Retrofi t Recommendati ons . 35 Recommended modifi cati ons to retrofi t current roadway cross-secti ons to create complete streets that encourage bicycling and walking. Pedestrian Environments . 61 Policies for pedestrian supporti ve design and recommended modifi cati ons to retrofi t current roadway cross-secti ons to create complete streets that encourage walking.
    [Show full text]
  • 5551 Allison St 8150 Reno Dr & 5480 Balsam St 06172021 V2
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 5551 ALLISON ST, 8150 RENO DR & 5480 BALSAM ST ARVADA, CO 80007 TRAVIS HODGE ANTHONY BOBAY TRINA BURTON Senior Advisor Investment Sales Advisor Broker Associate Sierra Vista Realty, LLC [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 404.259.8171 720.297.6667 720.209.9002 | 720.772.7171 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPERTY OVERVIEW LOCATION OVERVIEW APPENDIX PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Located in Qualified Opportunity Zone with Medium-High density residential zoning (24 units/acre). Less than 1/2 mile to Olde Town Arvada shops, restaurants, and commuter rail station. Sits on top of hill with incredible views facing south and west. Exempted from School Land Dedication/Fee-In-Lieu due to proximity to rail. 80002 zip code home values: 16.3% increase in the past year; 8.0% increase forecasted over next 12 months. SITE OVERVIEW SITE OVERVIEW ADDRESS 5551 ALLISON ST, 8150 RENO DR & 5480 BALSAM ST CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE ARVADA, CO 80002 PARCEL ID 3914206032, 3914206031, 3914206030 COUNTY JEFFERSON ZONING MUNICIPALITY CITY OF ARVADA ZONING R24 PARCEL SIZE (SF) 91,012 SF PARCEL SIZE (AC): 2.09 ACRES MAX HEIGHT (FT): 35' ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION: NO KNOWN CONDITIONS FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: NONE MILL LEVY: 96.499 LIST PRICE: TBD BY MARKET LOCATION OVERVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION The citizens of Arvada, CO have a great deal of pride in their city. Located just northwest of Denver, Arvada is a community unlike many others. Arvada consistently competes with the larger metropolitan areas in the areas of business and commerce but retains a small-town charm that other suburbs can’t replicate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ralston Corridor Report
    Ralston Road Corridor Plan April 2011 Ralston Road Corridor Plan Produced for: City of Arvada Produced by: Charlier Associates, Inc. with... Nelson/Nygaard Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Winston Associates Final Draft: April 2011 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ES-1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION . 1 Project Origin and Vision . 1 Stakeholder Involvement Overview . 2 Technical and Citi zens Advisory Committ ees . 2 Stakeholder Coff ees and Interviews. 3 The Great 8 . 3 Report Elements. 5 CHAPTER 2 - CURRENT AND FUTURE CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENT . 6 Corridor Overview . 6 Land Use Summary . 7 Pedestrian Environment . 8 Transit Service. 9 Motor Vehicles . .10 Public Workshop #1 . .14 CHAPTER 3 - CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT . .15 Long Range Corridor Objecti ves . .15 Corridor Concepts . .16 Land Use . .16 Transportati on . .17 Public Workshop #2 . .22 Cross Secti ons. .22 CHAPTER 4 - CONCEPT EVALUATION . 29 Evaluati on Criteria . .29 Fatal Flaw Outcomes . .29 Final Four Street Cross Secti ons . .31 Pedestrian Environment Approach . .34 Bicycle Approach . .34 Transit Opti ons . .34 Concept Evaluati on . .38 Streetcar Feasibility . .43 Third Public Outreach . .46 CONTENTS CHAPTER 5 - PREFERRED CONCEPT . 47 Process Review . .47 Overview of Preferred Concept . .47 Land Use . .48 Flexibility . .49 Pedestrian Environment . .51 Access Management . .54 Wide Landscaped Median. .56 Improved Connecti vity . .57 Bicycle Accommodati on . .58 Transit . .58 Project Cost Summary . .60 Implementati on Plan . .61 APPENDIX I - COMMITTEES . A-1 APPENDIX II - KEYPAD POLLING . A-2 APPENDIX III - CURRENT CONDITIONS (TRANSIT) . A-6 APPENDIX IV - CURRENT CONDITIONS (TRAFFIC). A-8 APPENDIX V - CONCEPT EVALUATION DATA . A-11 APPENDIX VI - SURVEY RESULTS. A-22 APPENDIX VII - PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. A-27 APPENDIX VIII - STREETCAR FEASIBILITY .
    [Show full text]