DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document IPP771 Public Disclosure Authorized THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ministry of Education, Science and Public Disclosure Authorized Technology (MoEST) KENYA GPE PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL VULNERABLE AND MARGINALISED GROUPS Public Disclosure Authorized FRAMEWORK (VMGF) JANUARY 2015 Prepared by: Tito Kodiaga Environment and Social Safeguards Specialist EMC Consultants Limited Cell: +254-722-579-272 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.emconsultants.org Public Disclosure Authorized Page | 1 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ASAL Arid and Semi Arid Land BOM Boards of Management CEMASTEA Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa COK Constitution of Kenya CPS Country Partnership Strategy CSO Civil Society Organizations DFID Department for International Development EGM Early Grade Mathematics EMIS Environmental Management Information System ESMF Environmental & Social Management Framework FPIC Free, prior, and informed consultation GOK Government of Kenya GPE Global Primary Education GRC Grievance Redress Committee GRM Grievances Redress Mechanism ILO International Labor Organization IPPF Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework KCPE Kenya Certificate of Primary Education KNCHR National Commission on Human Rights KNEC Kenya National Examination Council M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOEST Ministry of Education, Science and Technology NESP National Education Sector Plan NGO Non-Governmental Organisations NLC National Land Commission PCU Project Coordination Unit PLO Project Liaison Officer PRIMR Primary Research Initiative in Mathematics & Reading RED Regional Environment Divisions SA Social Assessment SAP Social Assessment Process SDI Service Delivery Indicator SIP School Improvement Plan TAD Teacher Appraisal and Development TSC Teaching Service Commission UNDRIP UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples UNPFII UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Interests USAID United States Agency for International Development VMG Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups VMGF Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework VMGP Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups Plan Page | 2 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Reasons for the use of a Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework ............................ 6 1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Component 1: Scaling Up Early Grade Mathematics .............................................................. 8 1.2.2 Component 2: Strengthened School Management ................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Component 3: Strengthening Data/EMIS System ................................................................. 10 1.2.4 Component 4: Project Management Functions ...................................................................... 11 1.3 Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups GPE Project Areas ............................................ 11 1.4 Vulnerable & Marginalized Groups Requirements .......................................................... 12 1.4.1 Screening, Preparation and Implementation of VMGPs ....................................................... 13 1.4.2 Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................... 14 1.4.3 Grievance Redress Mechanisms ............................................................................................. 14 1.4.4 Disclosure ............................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.5 Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................................... 15 1.4.6 Annual Reporting and Performance Review Requirements .................................................. 15 1.4.7 Budget ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Country and sector context/ Project Concept ......................................................................... 17 2.2 Sectoral and Institutional Context ....................................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Relationship to Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) ........................................................... 17 2.2.2 Proposed Development Objectives (PDOs) ............................................................................ 18 2.2.3 Objectives of the Project ......................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Global Project Education (GPE) ........................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 GPE Components: .................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 The Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups in Operational Areas ............................... 23 2.5 Project Implementation Arrangements ............................................................................. 24 3 METHODOLOGY AND CONSULTATION ................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Detailed and in-depth literature review ............................................................................ 25 3.2 Interactive Discussions ............................................................................................................. 25 3.3 Preparation of VMGF ............................................................................................................... 25 4 SOCIAL ASSESSMENT of THE VULNERABLE & MARGINALISED GROUPS in gPe Operational Areas ..... 26 4.1 Vulnerable and Marginalized Peoples in Kenya ............................................................. 26 4.2 Brief Highlight of Vulnerable and Marginalized Peoples in Kenya ............................. 27 4.3 No Specific Legislation on Vulnerable & Marginalized Groups in Kenya ................. 35 4.3.1 2010 Constitution of Kenya ................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Constitutional Implementation .............................................................................................. 36 Page | 3 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF 5 Potential Positive and Negative Impacts of GpE on vulnerable & marginalIsed groups ..................... 39 5.1 Potential Beneficial Impacts .................................................................................................. 39 5.2 Potential Negative Impacts ................................................................................................... 40 5.3 Proposed Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................. 40 6 framework for ensuring free, prior, and informed consultation ......................................................... 42 6.1 Project Investment Screening ............................................................................................... 42 6.1.1 Preparation of Social Screening Form .................................................................................... 43 6.2 Bank Decision on Project Investments ................................................................................ 44 6.2.1 Who Conducts the SA ............................................................................................................ 45 7 THE VULNERABLE & marginaliSed GROUPS plan ................................................................................. 46 7.1.1 Elements of a Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Plan ..................................................... 46 8 STRATEGY FOR PARTICIPATION & CONSULTATION WITH Vulnerable & marginalised groups ............ 50 9 GRIEVANCES REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................................................... 53 9.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 53 9.2 Grievance Redress Process ................................................................................................... 54 9.2.1 Establishment of Grievance Redress Committee .................................................................... 54 9.2.2 Use of Alternative Dispute Resettlement Mechanisms .......................................................... 55 9.2.3 Further Redress-Kenya
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission
    REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION The Government should immediately carry out counselling services, especially to those who lost their entire families to avoid mental breakdown. It is not too late to counsel the victims because they have not undergone any counselling at all. The community also seeks an apology from the Government, the reason being that the Government was supposed to protect its citizens yet it allowed its security forces to violently attack them and, therefore, perpetrated gross violation of their rights. Anybody who has been My recommendation to this Government is that it should involved in the killing address the question of equality in this country. We do of Kenyans, no matter not want to feel as if we do not belong to this country. We what position he holds, demand to be treated the same just like any other Kenyan in should not be given any any part of this country. We demand for equal treatment. responsibility. Volume IV KENYA REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION Volume IV © Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission, 2013 This publication is available as a pdf on the website of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (and upon its dissolution, on the website of its successor in law). It may be copied and distributed, in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. Published by Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), Kenya ISBN: 978-9966-1730-3-4 Design & Layout by Noel Creative Media Limited, Nairobi, Kenya His Excellency President of the Republic of Kenya Nairobi 3 May 2013 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL By Gazette Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kenyan British Colonial Experience
    Peace and Conflict Studies Volume 25 Number 1 Decolonizing Through a Peace and Article 2 Conflict Studies Lens 5-2018 Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience Peter Karari [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Karari, Peter (2018) "Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience," Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 25 : No. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.46743/1082-7307/2018.1436 Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol25/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Peace & Conflict Studies at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peace and Conflict Studies by an authorized editor of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience Abstract Colonialism can be traced back to the dawn of the “age of discovery” that was pioneered by the Portuguese and the Spanish empires in the 15th century. It was not until the 1870s that “New Imperialism” characterized by the ideology of European expansionism envisioned acquiring new territories overseas. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 prepared the ground for the direct rule and occupation of Africa by European powers. In 1895, Kenya became part of the British East Africa Protectorate. From 1920, the British colonized Kenya until her independence in 1963. As in many other former British colonies around the world, most conspicuous and appalling was the modus operandi that was employed to colonize the targeted territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartography and the Conception, Conquest and Control of Eastern Africa, 1844-1914
    Delineating Dominion: Cartography and the Conception, Conquest and Control of Eastern Africa, 1844-1914 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert H. Clemm Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor Alan Beyerchen Ousman Kobo Copyright by Robert H Clemm 2012 Abstract This dissertation documents the ways in which cartography was used during the Scramble for Africa to conceptualize, conquer and administer newly-won European colonies. By comparing the actions of two colonial powers, Germany and Britain, this study exposes how cartography was a constant in the colonial process. Using a three-tiered model of “gazes” (Discoverer, Despot, and Developer) maps are analyzed to show both the different purposes they were used for as well as the common appropriative power of the map. In doing so this study traces how cartography facilitated the colonial process of empire building from the beginnings of exploration to the administration of the colonies of German and British East Africa. During the period of exploration maps served to make the territory of Africa, previously unknown, legible to European audiences. Under the gaze of the Despot the map was used to legitimize the conquest of territory and add a permanence to the European colonies. Lastly, maps aided the capitalist development of the colonies as they were harnessed to make the land, and people, “useful.” Of special highlight is the ways in which maps were used in a similar manner by both private and state entities, suggesting a common understanding of the power of the map.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63
    Original citation: Anderson, David M.. (2017) Making the Loyalist bargain : surrender, amnesty and impunity in Kenya's decolonization, 1952–63. The International History Review, 39 (1). pp. 48-70. Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/86182 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For more details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ A note on versions: The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be cited as it appears here. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications The International History Review ISSN: 0707-5332 (Print) 1949-6540 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rinh20 Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63 David M. Anderson To cite this article: David M. Anderson (2017) Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63, The International History Review, 39:1, 48-70, DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2016.1230769 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2016.1230769 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 452 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rinh20 Download by: [137.205.202.97] Date: 27 February 2017, At: 03:26 THE INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2017 VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Peace Under the Mango Tree a Study on the Role of Local Institutions in Conflicts Over Natural Resources in Tana Delta, Kenya
    Making peace under the mango tree A study on the role of local institutions in conflicts over natural resources in Tana Delta, Kenya By Joris Cuppen s0613851 Master Thesis Human Geography Globalisation, Migration and Development Supervisor: Marcel Rutten October 2013 Radboud University Nijmegen ii Abstract In this research, conflicts over natural resources in the Tana Delta and the role of local institutions are central, with a special emphasis on the 2012/2013 clashes. In this region, conflicts between the two dominant ethnic groups, the Orma (who are predominantly herders) and the Pokomo (predominantly farmers), are common. Three types of institutions are involved with conflict management and natural resource management, namely the local administration, village elders, and peace committees. As for other regions in Kenya, the authority of elders has diminished in the past decades, whereas the local administration lacks the authority and capacity to govern the region. Therefore, peace committees can play a vital role in conflict management and natural resource management. The main natural resources which are contested in the Tana delta, are water, pasture, and farmland. Although peace committees seem fairly effective with managing cross-communal conflicts and preventing any further escalation, conflict prevention needs further priority. Cross- communal agreements to manage natural resources have been less and less the case, which is one of the main factors causing conflicts. Engagement of communities in making these agreements should be one of the priorities in the post-clashes Tana delta. As for the 2012/2013 clashes, it is likely that outside interference, either prior or during the conflict, has caused the escalation of violence, which has led to the loss of almost 200 human lives, probably because of a favourable outcome of the elections held in March 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems of Conversational Interaction: a Study of Three East African Tribes
    SYSTEMS OF CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION: A STUDY OF THREE EAST AFRICAN TRIBES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA By Chet A {Creider IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY June, 1973 University ot NAIROBI Library 0549611 2 UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI INST. OF AFRICAN STUDIES LIBRARY. Acknowledgement s It is a pleasure to acknowledge the institutional and individual support which was received in connection with this research. The financial support which made the project pos­ sible was provided under a National Institute of General Medical Sciences Graduate Training Grant No. GM 0116U and a National Science Foundation Grant No. 2790. In Kenya I was affiliated with the Institute of African Studies of the Uni­ versity of Nairobi and there received much assistance at a number of points in my work. 0 I am indebted to my adviser, Dr. H. B. Sarles, for supportive trust over an extended period of time, for advice at numerous junctures and most importantly for having ensured that I was properly equipped, both intellectually and in terms of technical skills, to undertake a project such as this. I am grateful to Dr. A. N. Tucker for encouragement when I still felt very much in the dark as I attempted to understand the Kipsigis language and for freely sharing with me his vast knowledge of Luo and Kalenjin. For patiently spending hours learning the intricacies of phonetic transcriptions, making transcriptions of the video­ taped conversations, and going over the forms of their lan­ guages with me again and again I would like to thank W.
    [Show full text]
  • TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement)
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 5-26-2013 Final Report - TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Final Report - TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement)" (2013). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 1. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. May 26, 2013 / Standard ON SUNDAY ADVERTISER’S ANNOUNCEMENT / Page XX TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION Promoting Peace, Justice, National Unity, Dignity, Healing and Reconciliation Among The People of Kenya REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION ABRIDGED VERSION INTRODUCTION Research and investigations: taking exercise and public hearings to accommodate persons with the Commission established an Investigation Department whih disabilities. The experiences of PWDs are reflected across the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC or the was responsible for identifying and interviewing witnesses whose various Chapters of this Volume. Commission) was established in the wake of the tragic events of individual stories would contribute to the historical narrative the 2007/2008 Post-Election Violence (PEV). of gross violations of human rights in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Debating on Success of the Kenya Counter Insurgency on the Shifta War: Between Double Success and Little Consolation
    International Affairs and Global Strategy www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-574X (Paper) ISSN 2224-8951 (Online) DOI: 10.7176/IAGS Vol.71, 2019 Debating on Success of the Kenya Counter Insurgency on the Shifta War: Between Double Success and Little Consolation Xavier F. Ichani 1* Reuben M. Matheka 2 Halkano A. Wario 2 1.Kenyatta University, Department of International Relations, Conflict and Strategic Studies 2.Egerton University, Department of Philosophy, History and Religion Abstract Military operations are undertaken to attain specific political and military objectives. However, what amounts to success in military operations remains unclear. Traditionally, operation success was narrowly defined in terms of objectives of the intervention. To ‘end human suffering’, ‘regime change,’ ‘capture a city,’ and ‘rescue captured troops.’ Modern definition of military success is human centric, based on tenets of just war principle of ‘do- more-good than harm.’ In this regards, operation success is achieved when and if in the intervention some people who would have died if no military assistance was granted, fail to die because the military intervened. Further, the restorative justice approach evaluates success of military operation in terms of state ability to repair harm committed by the military in the course of the war. The assumption is that military operations result in human rights violation. Using critical discourse analysis, this article interrogates the success of Kenya’s political and military objectives in the Shifta war against the four possible outcomes in war. First diplomatic and military success. Second, diplomatic and military failure. Third, diplomatic failure but military success and fourth, diplomatic success with military failure.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized THE GOVERNMENT OF KENYA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES KENYA WATER SECURITY AND CLIMATE RESILIENCE PROGRAM (KWSCRP) Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL VULNERABLE AND MARGINALISED GROUPS FRAMEWORK (VMGF) Public Disclosure Authorized (P117635) April 7th 2015 Prepared by: Tito Kodiaga and Lazarus Kubasu Nolasco Senior Environmental Specialist and Senior Social Specialist Project Management Unit Kenya Water Security and Climate Resilience Project (KWSCRP) Public Disclosure Authorized Nairobi, Kenya. Page | 1 KWSCRP Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APL Adaptable Program Loan ASAL Arid and Semi-Arid Lands AWSB Athi Water Services Board CDA Coast Development Authority CDD Community Driven Development CoK Constitution of Kenya CPS Country Partnership Strategy CAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program CSO Civil society organizations CWSB Coast Water Services Board DSS Decision Support System EAs Environmental Assessments EA Executing Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMCA Environmental Management and Coordination Act EMP Environmental Management Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FPIC Free, prior and informed consultation FS Feasibility Study GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Information System GIZ German Agency for International GOK Government of Kenya GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism GRC Grievance Redress
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Empowerment in Pastoral Societies
    WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN PASTORAL SOCIETIES Fiona Flintan SEPTEMBER 2008 ACRONYMS ABRDP Arsi Bale Rural Development Project AIWO African Indigenous Women’s Organisation AKRSP Aga Khan Rural Support Programme ALDEF Arid Lands Development Focus APDA Afar Pastoralist Development Association AU/IBAR African Union/Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee BVW Basic veterinary workers CAHW Community animal health workers CBNRM Community based natural resource management CBO Community based organisation CEMIRIDE Centre for Minority Rights Development CRTC Chinmaya Rural Training Centre CIDA Canadian International Development Agency CMW Celebration of Mountain Women DAWN Development Alternatives for Women in New Era EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FGM Female genital mutilation GB Great Britan GEM Gender empowerment measure GL-CRSP Global Livestock – Collaborative Research and Support Program GOs Governmental organisations GTF Gudina Tumsa Foundation GWP Gobi Women’s Project HLFFDP Hills Leasehold Forestry and Forage Development Project HPI Heifer Project International IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee ICIMOD International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development ICRISAT International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics IDRC International Development Research Centre, Canada IED Innovations Environnement Développement IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute IIED International Institute for Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Citizenship on the Border: Kenya Somalis, the Uncertainty of Belonging, and Public Sphere Interactions
    CODESRIA 12th General Assembly Governing the African Public Sphere 12e Assemblée générale Administrer l’espace public africain 12a Assembleia Geral Governar o Espaço Público Africano ةيعمجلا ةيمومعلا ةيناثلا رشع ﺣﻜﻢ اﻟﻔﻀﺎء اﻟﻌﺎم اﻹﻓﺮﻳﻘﻰ Seeking Citizenship on the Border: Kenya Somalis, the Uncertainty of Belonging, and Public Sphere Interactions Hussein A. Mahmoud Egerton University 07-11/12/2008 Yaoundé, Cameroun Abstract This paper examines the history and the processes that have led to the exclusion of Kenya’s northern and northeastern (N&NE) pastoral communities from the country’s public sphere. At the center of the deteriorating pastoralists-state relationships are the growth of Somali nationalism and the border controversy between Kenya and Somalia and the resultant irredentist war of the 1960s, the outcomes of which continue to shape Kenya government’s policy toward the N&NE Kenya. In the past more than four decades after Kenya’s independence and the end of the irredentist war, pastoral populations in the region continue to survive in immense isolation often under deplorable social and economic conditions away from the public domain. This is an outcome of a persistently tense pastoralists-state relationship that is largely based on suspicion and anti-pastoralist policies. The paper traces the trajectories through which area residents are attempting to negotiate increased social, economic, and political inclusion and a well-defined citizenship status and provision of associated rights through the public sphere. Introduction The pioneering work of T. H. Marshall (1950, 1998) is not only a valuable contribution to our understanding of citizenship, but also has remained influential in the writings and debates of scholars of citizenship issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Daily Prayer Guide for All Africa People Groups & All LR-Upgs = Least-Reached
    2020 Daily Prayer Guide for all Africa People Groups & Least-Reached-Unreached People Groups (LR-UPGs) Source: Joshua Project data, www.joshuaproject.net To order prayer resources or for inquiries, contact email: [email protected] 2020 Daily Prayer Guide for all Africa People Groups & all LR-UPGs = Least-Reached--Unreached People Groups. All 48 Africa countries & 8 islands & People Groups & LR-UPG are included. LR-UPG defin: less than 2% Evangelical & less than 5% total Christian Frontier definition = FR = 0.1% Christian or less AFRICA SUMMARY: 3,702 total Africa People Groups; 957 total Africa Least-Reached--Unreached People Groups. Downloaded in October 2019 from www.joshuaproject.net * * * Color code: green = begin new area; blue = begin new country shaded = LR-UPG; white-not shaded = not LR-UPG * * * "Prayer is not the only thing we can can do, but it is the most important thing we can do!" * * * Let's dream God's dreams, and fulfill God's visions -- God dreams of all people groups knowing & loving Him! * * * Revelation 7:9, "After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb." standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb." Why Should We Pray For Unreached People Groups? * Missions & salvation of all people is God's plan, God's will, God's heart, God's dream, Gen. 3:9,15! * In the Great Commissions Jesus commanded us to reach all peoples in the world, Matt.
    [Show full text]