DOCSLIB.ORG

TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 5-26-2013 Final Report - TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Final Report - TJRC Report (Newspaper Supplement)" (2013). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 1. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. May 26, 2013 / Standard ON SUNDAY ADVERTISER’S ANNOUNCEMENT / Page XX TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION Promoting Peace, Justice, National Unity, Dignity, Healing and Reconciliation Among The People of Kenya REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION ABRIDGED VERSION INTRODUCTION Research and investigations: taking exercise and public hearings to accommodate persons with the Commission established an Investigation Department whih disabilities. The experiences of PWDs are reflected across the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC or the was responsible for identifying and interviewing witnesses whose various Chapters of this Volume. Commission) was established in the wake of the tragic events of individual stories would contribute to the historical narrative the 2007/2008 Post-Election Violence (PEV). of gross violations of human rights in the country. The role of Volume III focuses on issues relating to national unity and the Department also extended to the collection and analysis of reconciliation in Kenya. The Commission was mandated to inquire The Commission has produced its Report as the culmination of relevant documentary and other forms of evidence. Investigations into the causes of ethnic tension and make recommendations on a process that lasted four years and took the Commission to all were conducted in three main phases: before, during and after the the promotion of healing, reconciliation and coexistence among regions of the country. hearings. ethnic communities. The violence, bloodshed and destruction of the PEV shocked Hearings: The Commission started its hearings in mid-April 2011 The final volume of the Report - Volume IV - provides a catalogue Kenyans into the realisation that their nation, long considered in Garissa and concluded at the beginning of April 2012 in Nairobi. of the findings and recommendations of the Commission. Included an island of peace and tranquillity, remained deeply divided The Commission conducted three kinds of hearings: individual in this volume is the Commission’s recommendation relating to the since independence from British colonial rule in December hearings, women’s hearings and thematic hearings. implementation mechanism and reparation framework. 1963. It prompted a fresh opportunity for the country to examine the negative practices of the past four and half decades that Individual hearings focused on the experience of individuals in THEMATIC OVERVIEWS contributed to a state that still holds sway in Kenya: normalization relation to gross violation of human rights. Testimony was heard and institutionalization of gross violation of human rights, abuse of from individuals whose rights had been violated, as well as from Political History: A general outline power and misuse of public office. those who either had knowledge of or allegedly participated in acts that resulted in the violations. In order to contextualise gross violations of human rights and In the aftermath of the 2007/2008 PEV, the Kenya National Dialogue historical injustices that occurred during the mandate period, and Reconciliation (KNDR) process resulted in the adoption of Women’s hearings were exclusively attended by women. The the Commission divided the political history of Kenya into four among others, the Agreement on the Principles of Partnership of hearings were framed as ‘conversations with women’. They were distinct epochs. These epochs correspond with the four political the Coalition Government (Coalition Agreement) on the basis of designed to and were safe spaces where women could freely talk administrations that governed the country prior to and during the which, the National Assembly enacted the National Accord and about violations that were specific to them. thematic hearings that Commission’s mandate period: Reconciliation Act on 18 March 2008. The National Accord paved focused on specific violations, events, or groups of victims. • British colonial era (1895 to 1963); the way for the establishment of a coalition government with a • President Jomo Kenyatta’s era (1963 to 1978); President, Prime Minister and two Deputy Prime Ministers. Thematic hearings were meant to elicit public testimony on specific • President Daniel arap Moi’s era (1978 to 2002); and themes that are of particular importance in Kenya’s pursuit for • President Mwai Kibaki’s era (2002 to 2008). As part of the KNDR process, an agreement for the establishment truth, justice and reconciliation. The Commission held a total of 14 of a truth, justice and reconciliation commission (TJRC Agreement) thematic hearings focusing on diverse subjects. A review of the colonial period by the Commission revealed a litany was also adopted. Pursuant to the TJRC Agreement, the National of offences and atrocities commited by the British administration Assembly enacted the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Act (TJR Report writing: The final product of the Commission is a Report against the people now known as Kenyans. These violations Act) on 23 October 2008. The Act received Presidential Assent on which was compiled in terms of section 5(j) and 48(2) of the TJR included massacres, torture, arbitary detention, and sexual 28 November 2008 and came into operation on 17 March 2009. Act. These sections essentially tasked the Commission to compile violence, most of which were committed, initially, when the British a report providing as comprehensive as possible an account of its government forced its authority on the local population, and later, In terms of the TJR Act, the Commission was inaugurated on 3 activities and findings together with recommendations on measures when it violently sought to quash the Mau Mau rebellion. From 1952 August 2009.The broad mandate of the Commission was to inquire to prevent the future occurrence of violations. Details of the Report onwards, the British administration established detention camps in into gross violation of human rights and historical injustices that are provided below. which suspected members of Mau Mau and/or their sympathisers occurred in Kenya from 12 December 1963 when Kenya became were tortured and ill-treated. Others were detained in restricted independent to 28 February 2008 when the Coalition Agreement THE REPORT villages where they were used as forced labour under harsh and was signed inhuman or degrading conditions.The colonial government was The Report is structured into four volumes: also responsible for massive displacement of thousands of people METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS from their lands. More than 2 million hectares of land were taken Volume I provides an account of how the Commission was formed, away from the original inhabitants. This displacement created the The work of the Commission was structured into four mutual and how it interpreted its mandate and conducted its work, and the conflicts over land that remain the cause and driver of conflict and overlapping phases: statement-taking, research and investigations, challenges it faced in carrying out its mandate. ethnic tension in Kenya today. hearings and report writing. Civic education was conducted On 12 December 1963, Kenya gained independence from British alongside these activities. Volume II is further divided into three sub-volumes. Volume IIA focuses on the major violations of bodily integrity rights that were rule. Independence came with high expectations and hopes. It signaled an end to practices that had been institutionalised under Statement taking: The Commission designed a Statement Form committed during the Commission’s mandate period. These are: British rule; the end of racial segregation, detention camps, torture, to capture information from witnesses. The Statement Form was unlawful killings and enforced disappearances (that is, massacres, massacres, unlawful killings and similar practices that had been designed to ensure the gathering of as much information as extra-judiial killings, and political assassinations); unlawful institutionalised under colonialism. To the citizens of a new free possible about gross violations of human rights. The Commission detentions, torture and ill-treatment; and sexual violence. While nation, independence meant the return to lands from which they undertook an initial statement taking exercise in Mt Elgon in May much of this volume is focused on violations directly committed by had been forcibly evicted and of which they had been dispossessed and June 2010. This was a pilot project which the Commission the state, it also includes descriptions of killings, severe injury and in order to pave the way for
Recommended publications
  • Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya

    Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Elischer, Sebastian Working Paper Ethnic Coalitions of Convenience and Commitment: Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya GIGA Working Papers, No. 68 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Elischer, Sebastian (2008) : Ethnic Coalitions of Convenience and Commitment: Political Parties and Party Systems in Kenya, GIGA Working Papers, No. 68, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47826 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort
  • Kenya in Crisis

    Kenya in Crisis

    KENYA IN CRISIS Africa Report N°137 – 21 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE ELECTION CRISIS ............................................................................................. 2 A. A TIGHT AND TENSE RACE ...................................................................................................2 1. Coalition building ......................................................................................................3 2. The issues...................................................................................................................4 B. THE RIGGING OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ....................................................................6 III. THE SECURITY CRISIS.............................................................................................. 9 A. PROTEST AND REPRESSION....................................................................................................9 B. ESCALATION IN THE RIFT VALLEY ......................................................................................10 1. The rise of Kalenjin warriors in the North Rift .......................................................11 2. The return of Mungiki..............................................................................................13 3. Coast Province: the next theatre of violence?..........................................................15
  • Report of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission

    Report of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission

    REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION The Government should immediately carry out counselling services, especially to those who lost their entire families to avoid mental breakdown. It is not too late to counsel the victims because they have not undergone any counselling at all. The community also seeks an apology from the Government, the reason being that the Government was supposed to protect its citizens yet it allowed its security forces to violently attack them and, therefore, perpetrated gross violation of their rights. Anybody who has been My recommendation to this Government is that it should involved in the killing address the question of equality in this country. We do of Kenyans, no matter not want to feel as if we do not belong to this country. We what position he holds, demand to be treated the same just like any other Kenyan in should not be given any any part of this country. We demand for equal treatment. responsibility. Volume IV KENYA REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION Volume IV © Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission, 2013 This publication is available as a pdf on the website of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (and upon its dissolution, on the website of its successor in law). It may be copied and distributed, in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. Published by Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), Kenya ISBN: 978-9966-1730-3-4 Design & Layout by Noel Creative Media Limited, Nairobi, Kenya His Excellency President of the Republic of Kenya Nairobi 3 May 2013 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL By Gazette Notice No.
  • 1843 KMS Kenya Past and Present Issue 43

    1843 KMS Kenya Past and Present Issue 43

    Kenya Past and Present Issue 43 Kenya Past and Present Editor Peta Meyer Editorial Board Marla Stone Patricia Jentz Kathy Vaughan Kenya Past and Present is a publication of the Kenya Museum Society, a not-for-profit organisation founded in 1971 to support and raise funds for the National Museums of Kenya. Correspondence should be addressed to: Kenya Museum Society, PO Box 40658, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Email: [email protected] Website: www.KenyaMuseumSociety.org Statements of fact and opinion appearing in Kenya Past and Present are made on the responsibility of the author alone and do not imply the endorsement of the editor or publishers. Reproduction of the contents is permitted with acknowledgement given to its source. We encourage the contribution of articles, which may be sent to the editor at [email protected]. No category exists for subscription to Kenya Past and Present; it is a benefit of membership in the Kenya Museum Society. Available back issues are for sale at the Society’s offices in the Nairobi National Museum. Any organisation wishing to exchange journals should write to the Resource Centre Manager, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658, Nairobi 00100, Kenya, or send an email to [email protected] Designed by Tara Consultants Ltd ©Kenya Museum Society Nairobi, April 2016 Kenya Past and Present Issue 43, 2016 Contents KMS highlights 2015 ..................................................................................... 3 Patricia Jentz To conserve Kenya’s natural and cultural heritage ........................................ 9 Marla Stone Museum highlights 2015 ............................................................................. 11 Juliana Jebet and Hellen Njagi Beauty and the bead: Ostrich eggshell beads through prehistory .................................................. 17 Angela W.
  • The Kenyan British Colonial Experience

    The Kenyan British Colonial Experience

    Peace and Conflict Studies Volume 25 Number 1 Decolonizing Through a Peace and Article 2 Conflict Studies Lens 5-2018 Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience Peter Karari [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Karari, Peter (2018) "Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience," Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 25 : No. 1 , Article 2. DOI: 10.46743/1082-7307/2018.1436 Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol25/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Peace & Conflict Studies at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peace and Conflict Studies by an authorized editor of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modus Operandi of Oppressing the “Savages”: The Kenyan British Colonial Experience Abstract Colonialism can be traced back to the dawn of the “age of discovery” that was pioneered by the Portuguese and the Spanish empires in the 15th century. It was not until the 1870s that “New Imperialism” characterized by the ideology of European expansionism envisioned acquiring new territories overseas. The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 prepared the ground for the direct rule and occupation of Africa by European powers. In 1895, Kenya became part of the British East Africa Protectorate. From 1920, the British colonized Kenya until her independence in 1963. As in many other former British colonies around the world, most conspicuous and appalling was the modus operandi that was employed to colonize the targeted territories.
  • The Kenyan Crisis: How And

    The Kenyan Crisis: How And

    The Kenyan Crisis: Post December 2007 Elections Renu Modi Seema Shekhawat Working Paper No: 1 Centre for African Studies Area Studies Building Behind Marathi Bhasha Bhavan University of Mumbai Vidyanagari, Santacruz (E) Mumbai: 400 098. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 1 Contents Acronyms 03 Resume 04 Introduction 05 The Background 05 The Kibaki Administration 08 The Governance Crisis 11 December 2007 Elections 13 Repercussions 18 Deep Rooted Reasons 19 Authoritarian ‘Democratic’ Structures 20 Unrestrained Powers of the President 20 Lack of Space for the Opposition 21 Popular Disillusionment 21 Political Violence 22 The Ethnicity Factor 23 The Economic Factor 24 Colonial Legacy 26 Conclusion 28 Endnotes and References 29 Tables Table 1: 27 December 2002 Election 07 Table 2: November 21, 2005 Constitutional Referendum 11 Table 3: Composition of the 10th Parliament 14 2 Acronyms ICG International Crisis Group IMF International Monetary Fund KANU Kenya African National Union NARC National Rainbow Coalition ODM Orange Democratic Movement ODM-K Orange Democratic Movement-Kenya 3 Resume Renu Modi Renu Modi is a lecturer and Director of the Department of African Studies, University of Mumbai. She is a political scientist and graduated from the Lady Shree Ram College for Women, Delhi University. She received her PhD. from the Centre for African Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Her research interests include issues of development- displacement and livelihood reconstitution at resettlement sites and contemporary political, economic and social issues from a gendered perspective in the Afro- Asian context. Seema Shekhawat Seema Shekhawat holds a doctoral degree in Political Science from the University of Jammu, India.
  • By Mutegi Njau to Ordinary Kenyans, the Reports Were

    By Mutegi Njau to Ordinary Kenyans, the Reports Were

    By Mutegi Njau To ordinary Kenyans, the reports were horrific: people being beheaded and skinned around the country — crimes attributed to maverick gangs called Mungiki (masses of people). The police retaliated by randomly raiding the suspected gang’s hideouts and by indiscriminately killing alleged gang members. To Kenyans aged 45 and over, the incidents were reminiscent of Mau Mau period (1952-60), when Kenyan freedom fighters brutally killed colonialists and their collaborators and drank their blood. For most of 2007, the dreaded Mungiki gangs have disrupted public transport and killed and maimed civilians in Nairobi and other major towns and villages in the Central and Rift Valley provinces. Corruption in the police and within the political circles has allowed Mungiki to thrive. The gangsters, who extort money from public transporters and commandeer public utility facilities, such as electric power and water with impunity, have police and political patronage. Indeed, even to a casual observer, there is irony in the way Mungiki operates. It was created to clean up corruption, yet Mungiki is itself corrupt and has grown and flourished because of a corrupt environment. The outlaw group was founded by youths outraged at economic decline, runaway corruption and the near collapse of family values in the late 1980s. Extortion became its modus operandi, and as it sought to bring back order, it used police officers it paid handsomely to protect its turf and businesses. Mungiki is reminiscent of the Italian organized crime operation, the Mafia, which enlisted police, judiciary, and even the political elite. Now Mungiki is the new face of corruption in Kenya.
  • Political Patronage on the Operationalisation of Public Procurement Law in Kenya

    Political Patronage on the Operationalisation of Public Procurement Law in Kenya

    POLITICAL PATRONAGE ON THE OPERATIONALISATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT LAW IN KENYA NJUGUNA HUMPHREY KIMANI REG. NO. G80/83401/2012 A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law of the University of Nairobi 2017 ii DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Njuguna Humphrey Kimani Signature................................ Date ................................... This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as University Supervisors. 1. Prof. (Justice) James Otieno Odek Signature................................ Associate Professor of Law (UoN) Date:...................................... 2. Prof. Paul Musili Wambua Signature:............................ Associate Professor of Law (UoN) Date:....................................... 3. Dr. Attiya Waris Signature:............................... Senior Lecturer of Law (UoN) Date:....................................... iii DEDICATION To my loving parents, the late Mzee Henry Njuguna, popularly known as Sir Henry and my mother Esther Wanjiru Njuguna; I share this work with both of you for always encouraging me to achieve my goals and for having unwavering confidence in my abilities even during challenging times. You provided infinite compassion and support from which I drew the values of a life-long respect for education. To my dear wife, Nancy Njuguna, our loving children: Njuguna, Kamau and Wanjiru, I thank you for your love, support and patience during the entire process of this study. And to the people of Kenya, who for years have stood for a just society of men and women; those who have risked their lives in fighting for reforms, and to those who continue to advocate for good governance, integrity, transparency and accountability, this study hails you for your selflessness and dedication.
  • Cartography and the Conception, Conquest and Control of Eastern Africa, 1844-1914

    Cartography and the Conception, Conquest and Control of Eastern Africa, 1844-1914

    Delineating Dominion: Cartography and the Conception, Conquest and Control of Eastern Africa, 1844-1914 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert H. Clemm Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor Alan Beyerchen Ousman Kobo Copyright by Robert H Clemm 2012 Abstract This dissertation documents the ways in which cartography was used during the Scramble for Africa to conceptualize, conquer and administer newly-won European colonies. By comparing the actions of two colonial powers, Germany and Britain, this study exposes how cartography was a constant in the colonial process. Using a three-tiered model of “gazes” (Discoverer, Despot, and Developer) maps are analyzed to show both the different purposes they were used for as well as the common appropriative power of the map. In doing so this study traces how cartography facilitated the colonial process of empire building from the beginnings of exploration to the administration of the colonies of German and British East Africa. During the period of exploration maps served to make the territory of Africa, previously unknown, legible to European audiences. Under the gaze of the Despot the map was used to legitimize the conquest of territory and add a permanence to the European colonies. Lastly, maps aided the capitalist development of the colonies as they were harnessed to make the land, and people, “useful.” Of special highlight is the ways in which maps were used in a similar manner by both private and state entities, suggesting a common understanding of the power of the map.
  • Mozambican Revolution, No. 16

    Mozambican Revolution, No. 16

    Mozambican Revolution, No. 16 http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.numr196503 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org Mozambican Revolution, No. 16 Alternative title Mozambique Revolution Author/Creator Mozambique Liberation Front - FRELIMO Contributor Department of Information [FRELIMO] Publisher Mozambique Liberation Front - FRELIMO Date 1965-03 Resource type Magazines (Periodicals) Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) Mozambique Coverage (temporal) 1965 Source Northwestern University Library, L967.905 M939 Rights By kind permission of the Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO). Description Editorial; South-African soldiers in the Portuguese army; Communiques; Repressions in Mozambique; Pio Gama Pinto was murdered; FRELIMO’s delegation to the UN; The I.C.C.J.
  • Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63

    Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63

    Original citation: Anderson, David M.. (2017) Making the Loyalist bargain : surrender, amnesty and impunity in Kenya's decolonization, 1952–63. The International History Review, 39 (1). pp. 48-70. Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/86182 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work of researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) and may be reused according to the conditions of the license. For more details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ A note on versions: The version presented in WRAP is the published version, or, version of record, and may be cited as it appears here. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications The International History Review ISSN: 0707-5332 (Print) 1949-6540 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rinh20 Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63 David M. Anderson To cite this article: David M. Anderson (2017) Making the Loyalist Bargain: Surrender, Amnesty and Impunity in Kenya's Decolonization, 1952–63, The International History Review, 39:1, 48-70, DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2016.1230769 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2016.1230769 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 452 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rinh20 Download by: [137.205.202.97] Date: 27 February 2017, At: 03:26 THE INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2017 VOL.
  • Kenya – Whistle-Blowers – Corruption – Opposition Parties – Political Activists – Ethnic Pokomo

    Kenya – Whistle-Blowers – Corruption – Opposition Parties – Political Activists – Ethnic Pokomo

    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: KEN34144 Country: Kenya Date: 16 December 2008 Keywords: Kenya – Whistle-blowers – Corruption – Opposition parties – Political activists – Ethnic Pokomo This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide any information on the protection of “whistle-blowers”, who expose corruption in the Kenyan government. 2. Please provide any information on the treatment of supporters of the Kenyan opposition. 3. Please provide any information on the treatment of those of Pokomo ethnicity. RESPONSE 1. Please provide any information on the protection of “whistle-blowers”, who expose corruption in the Kenyan government. Sources quoted below report that government corruption remains a problem in Kenya. The Witness Protection Act was passed in 2006, however, delays with implementation and weaknesses in the Act limit its effectiveness. Whistle-blowers in Kenya are at risk of violence and discrimination. The information provided in response to this question has been organised into the following eight sections: • Government Corruption; • Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission; • Whistleblower Reporting System; • Witness Protection; • Effectiveness of Witness Protection; • Freedom of Information Bill; • Other Laws; • Examples of Whistle-Blowing.