Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme
Transport Assessment
Pembrokeshire County Council
22 September 2017
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Notice
This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Pembrokeshire County Council’s information and use in relation to the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme.
Atkins Transportation assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents.
This document has 40 pages including the cover.
Document history
Job number: 5123664 Document ref: Transport Assessment Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Draft for Pre-Application CJ GM CK GM 03/10/16 Consultation Rev 2.0 For Outline Application BH GM CK GM 16/12/16 Version 1 Rev 3.0 For Outline Application BH GM CK GM 19/12/16 Version 2 Rev 4.0 For Outline Application BH GM CK GM 22/12/16 Version 3 Rev 5.0 For Planning Application BH GM CK GM 21/07/17 Version 4 Rev 6.0 For Planning Application BH GM CK GM 26/07/17 Version 5 Rev 7.0 For Planning Application BH GM CK GM 27/07/17 Version 6 Rev 8.0 For Planning Application BH GM CK GM 22/09/17 Version 7
Client signoff
Client Pembrokeshire County Council – Transport & Environment
Project Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme
Document title Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Job no. 5123664
Copy no. 1
Document Transport Assessment reference
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Table of contents
Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 6 1.1. Scheme Description 6 1.2. Document Purpose 7 1.3. Report Structure 7 2. Planning Policy Context 8 2.1. Overview 8 2.2. National Policy 8 2.3. Regional Policy 10 2.4. Local Policy 11 3. Existing Situation 12 3.1. Overview 12 3.2. Surrounding Area 12 3.3. Existing Transport Network 14 4. Personal Injury Accidents 23 5. Proposed Development 26 5.1. Overview 26 5.2. Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme 26 5.3. Trunk Road Improvements 28 6. Traffic Impact Assessment 29 6.1. Introduction 29 6.2. Assessment Scenarios 29 6.3. Traffic Flows 29 6.4. Junction Analysis 29 6.5. Conclusion 32 7. Transport Implementation Strategy 33 7.1. Introduction 33 7.2. Chimneys Link Transport Implementation Strategy 33 8. Summary and Conclusions 34
Appendices 35 Appendix A. PIA Data 36 Appendix B. Traffic Flow Diagrams 37 Appendix C. Junction Capacity Modelling Outputs 38 Appendix D. Existing Carriageway Widths 39
Tables Table 3-1 Bus Services: Fishguard ...... 21 Table 3-2 Rail Services: Fishguard Harbour (& Fishguard and Goodwick) (May 2017 timetable) ...... 22 Table 4-1 PIA Summary – Vicinity of the Proposed Development ...... 24 Table 6-1 The Square (Roundabout) – ARCADY Analysis Results 2018 ...... 30 Table 6-2 The Square (Roundabout) – ARCADY Analysis Results 2028 ...... 31 Table 6-3 ‘Do Nothing’ and ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2018 ...... 31 Table 6-4 ‘Do Nothing’ and ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2028 ...... 31 Table 6-5 ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2018 and 2028 ...... 32
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figures Figure 1-1 Site Location Plan ...... 6 Figure 3-1 Fishguard Town Centre Amenities and Attractions ...... 12 Figure 3-2 North Access (ex-school site), via A487 West Street ...... 13 Figure 3-3 South Access (Co-Operative), via A40 High Street ...... 14 Figure 3-4 Fishguard Town Centre Amenities and Attractions ...... 15 Figure 3-5 A487 Main Street ...... 16 Figure 3-6 A40 High Street...... 17 Figure 3-7 A487 West Street ...... 18 Figure 3-8 Fishguard Pedestrian Network ...... 19 Figure 3-9 Cycling in and around Fishguard ...... 20 Figure 3-10 The Square Bus Stops ...... 21 Figure 4-1 PIA Study Area ...... 23 Figure 5-1 Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme – Site Layout Plan...... 27 Figure 5-2 Development Site and Indicative Link Road ...... 28
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme
Transport Assessment
Planning Application
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
1. Introduction
1.1. Scheme Description Atkins Ltd. has been instructed by Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC) – Transportation & Environment to prepare and submit an application for full planning permission for redevelopment of land within Fishguard Town Centre, Pembrokeshire. The Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme (“the scheme”) provides improved traffic flows, better public transport facilities, improved permeability for pedestrians and cyclists and an improved public realm. A one-way system created by the scheme will facilitate complementary improvements to the public realm along West St and High St in the form of reduced congestion, increased space devoted to footways and improved safety for both road users and pedestrians.
This scheme is a continuation from a previously approved proposal – the Phase 1 scheme was subject to planning permission granted on 20 February 2017 (Reference: 16/0857/PA) and consists of the following:
Partial demolition of the Ship & Anchor Public House; Relocation of the Co-op building entrance; Construction of car park areas; and Landscaping.
The scope of this full planning application includes the following: Construction of a new link road to form part of a one way gyratory system through the centre of Fishguard; Non-motorised user provision; Bus/Coach focal point; Public realm improvements; Changes to the delivery area and former parking area of the Co-Operative store; Street lighting and signage; Surface water drainage infrastructure; Bat house; and Demolition of the former Fishguard Junior School main building, the school canteen, three outbuildings, Transition Bro Gwaun and the pitched roof section of the former library attached to the Ship & Anchor Public House.
Figure 1-1 Site Location Plan
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 6
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
1.2. Document Purpose This Transport Assessment (TA) has been prepared in support of the planning application and evaluates the impact of the development proposals on the surrounding transport network. The TA has been produced in accordance with the Welsh Government’s Technical Advice Note (TAN) 18: Transport.
1.3. Report Structure This TA Report includes a further seven chapters as follows:
Chapter 2: Planning Policy Context; Chapter 3: Existing Situation; Chapter 4: Personal Injury Accidents; Chapter 5: Proposed Development; Chapter 6: Traffic Impact Assessment; Chapter 7: Transport Implementation Strategy; and Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 7
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
2. Planning Policy Context
2.1. Overview This Chapter of the report reviews the transportation policy considerations which are relevant to the proposed scheme at a national, regional and local level. The following documents have been included as part of this review:
National Policy; - Planning Policy Wales (PPW); - TAN: 18 Transport; - Wales Transport Strategy (WTS); and - National Transport Finance Plan. Regional Policy; - Swansea Bay City Region; and - Joint Transport Plan for South West Wales. Local Policy; - Local Development Plan.
2.2. National Policy
2.2.1. Planning Policy Wales (PPW) (Edition 9, November 2016)1 Planning Policy Wales (PPW) sets out the land use planning policies of the Welsh Government. It outlines how the Welsh Government’s commitments to sustainable development can be integrated into the planning system. PPW provides the policy framework for the effective preparation of local planning authorities’ Development Plans. The document is supplemented by 21 topic based Technical Advice Notes (TANs), with TAN 18: Transport of particular note.
Section 8 of the PPW document sets out the Welsh Government’s objectives in relation to transport. It references the aim to extend the choice in transport and secure accessibility in a way which supports sustainable development and helps to tackle the causes of climate change. This is achievable through promoting the use of more sustainable and healthy forms of travel (i.e. cycling and walking), with the ambition of improving the levels of health in Wales.
The PPW states that land use planning can achieve the Welsh Governments objectives for transport through;
Improving accessibility by walking, cycling and public transport; Promoting walking and cycling; and Supporting sustainable travel options.
2.2.2. TAN: 18 Transport2 TAN 18: Transport explains how an efficient and sustainable transport system is required for a modern, prosperous and inclusive society. The Welsh Government has a statutory duty towards sustainable development. TAN 18 describes how the Welsh Government intends to integrate land use and transport planning in order to achieve their outcomes with regard to climate change. The integration of land use planning can help achieve positive sustainable development outcomes by ensuring new development is located where it is accessible by public transport, walking and cycling.
Annex D of the policy document refers to the use of Transport Assessments (TA). A TA is required to clearly set out what the impact of a proposed development is likely to be so that they are easily understood.
1 Welsh Government (2016). Planning policy and guidance. Planning Policy Wales (Edition 9, November 2016). Available online: http://gov.wales/docs/desh/publications/161117planning-policy-wales-edition-9-en.pdf [Accessed: 07/07/2017] 2 Welsh Government (2013). Planning policy and guidance. Technical Advice Note (TAN) 18: Transport (2007). Available online: http://gov.wales/docs/desh/publications/070301tan18en.pdf [Accessed: 07/07/2017]
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 8
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
2.2.3. Wales Transport Strategy (2008)3 The Wales Transport Strategy (WTS) was published in 2008 and is a statutory strategy required by the Transport (Wales) Act. It superseded the existing Transport Framework for Wales. The WTS was the first ever comprehensive transport strategy for Wales. The WTS sets out how it is intended to achieve social, economic and environmental outcomes of the Welsh Government, including improving links and access between key settlements and sites across Wales.
PPW and the WTS both aim to secure the provision of transport infrastructure and services which improve accessibility, build a stronger economy, improve road safety and foster more sustainable communities. This includes:
Integration of transport and land use planning; Integration between different types of transport; and Integration of transport policy with environment, education, social justice, health, economic development and wealth creation policies.
Ultimately the WTS intends to influence three sets of long term outcomes:
Social – improving access to services and needs of individuals as well as encouraging healthy lifestyles and impressions of safety; Economic – improving access to employment and more generally across Wales and doing this efficiently for both people and freight; and Environmental – increasing the sustainability of transport and reducing its impact on the local environment.
2.2.4. National Transport Finance Plan (2015)4 Although not a policy document, the National Transport Finance Plan superseded The National Plan. It is the Wales Transport Strategy (WTS) that sets out the policy framework, with the National Transport Finance Plan listing the schemes that the Welsh Government will deliver across the different areas of transport for which it is responsible for.
The purpose of the plan is to:
Provide the timescale for financing the schemes undertaken by the Welsh Government; Provide the timescale for delivering these schemes; Detail the estimated expenditure required to deliver the schemes; and Identify the likely source of financing to allow delivery to take place.
Proposed schemes which are incorporated into the Plan specifically in the Pembrokeshire region include:
Roads – New Road Infrastructure – Schemes to be Constructed o Scheme Ref: R15 – Improvements to the A40 – Llanddewi Velfrey to Penblewin; . Timescale 2015/16 – 2019/2020. Review Welsh Government’s Strategic Network o Scheme Ref: R25d – A477 Pembroke Dock to Johnston (Pembrokeshire); . Timescale 2016/17 – 2018/19. Identify a programme of future improvements o Scheme Ref: RI10 – Prioritised list of new station proposals for further consideration – Templeton; . Timescale 2016/17 – 2020 and beyond.
3 Welsh Government (2015). Transport planning and strategies. The Wales Transport Strategy. Available online: http://gov.wales/docs/det/publications/140909-transport-strategy-en.pdf [Accessed: 07/07/2017] 4 Welsh Government (2015). Transport planning and strategies. National Transport Finance Plan. Available online: http://gov.wales/docs/det/policy/150722-ntfp15-en.pdf [Accessed: 07/07/2017]
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 9
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
2.3. Regional Policy
2.3.1. Swansea Bay City Region5 In 2013, the Welsh Government created the Swansea Bay City Region, encompassing the four local authority areas of Neath Port Talbot, Swansea, Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire, working together on a Swansea Bay City Region Board.
The driving force for the City Region is the delivery of the objectives and outcomes from the Regional Economic Regeneration Strategy (RERS).
On Monday 20th March 2017, the Swansea Bay City Deal was approved, boosting ‘the local economy by £1.8 billion’ and generating ‘almost 10,000 new jobs over the next 15 years’.
As part of the City Deal, Pembrokeshire is involved in three key schemes, spearheaded by the Port of Milford Haven, Pembroke Dock Marine is a £76 million project to establish a marine energy centre around the Milford Haven waterway. The other two schemes which will be rolled out across Pembrokeshire involves improving broadband and mobile continuity and creating a new industry based around innovative and sustainable energy generation.
2.3.2. Joint Transport Plan (JTP) for South West Wales (2015-2020)6 The four authorities in South West Wales (Neath Port Talbot, Swansea, Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire) have worked collaboratively to create an overarching Transport Plan for the City Region. The plan provides a framework for improving connectivity to, from and within the region for the period 2015-2020.
The JTP replaced the RTP with effect from 1st April 2015.
The authorities in the City Region recognise that the overarching policy context of the previous RTP is still valid. Since the JTP will help facilitate the aspirations for a ‘Connected City Region,’ the vision and objectives for the JTP are based on the previous RTP, and comprise:
To improve the efficiency and reliability of the movement of people and freight within and beyond South West Wales to support economic growth in the City Region; To improve access for all to a wide range of services and facilities including employment and business, education and training, health care, tourism and leisure activities; To improve the sustainability of transport by improving the range and quality of, and awareness about, transport options, including those which improve health and well-being; To improve integration between policies, service provision and modes of transport in South West Wales; To implement measures which will protect and enhance the natural and built environment and reduce the adverse impact of transport on health and climate change; and To improve road safety and personal security in South West Wales.
More specifically, one of the measures mentioned for Fishguard is: ‘Fishguard Town Centre Access Improvements including bus focal point,’ to be delivered using a ‘link road to enable a one-way system and Bus Focal point in the centre of Fishguard. Work will include footway and shared-use path provision, safety improvements and enhancements to public transport infrastructure’.
The proposed scheme has been identified as a level 2 priority, the second highest priority scheme for Pembrokeshire.
Fundamentally, this scheme is in line with the most recent JTP.
5 Swansea Bay City Region (2017). Available online: http://www.swanseabaycityregion.com/en/index.htm [Accessed: 07/07/2017] 6 City and County of Swansea (2015). Local transport plan. Joint Transport Plan for South West Wales 2015-2020. Available online: http://www.swansea.gov.uk/localtransportplan [Accessed: 07/07/2017]
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 10
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
2.4. Local Policy
2.4.1. Pembrokeshire County Council’s Local Development Plan7 The Local Development Plan (LDP) was adopted by PCC in February 2013. The plan specifically notes the importance of Fishguard (and Goodwick) as a Hub in the north of Pembrokeshire and by way of acknowledging their value, reference is made to both the development site and associated Trunk Road improvements.
The following policies specifically relate to the proposed development site and associated Trunk Road Improvement Scheme:
Retail Allocation (Policy GN13) – The Old Fishguard Primary School Site – with the allocations having been made in accordance with guidance from national planning policy, following analysis of need (as set out in Pembrokeshire County Wide Retail Capacity Study 2010). Transport Routes and Improvements (Policy GN39) o Bus and Rail Interchange [7] – Fishguard (bus focal point) o County Council Programmed Highway Schemes [15] - A40 High Street to A487 West Street ('Chimney’s' Link)
Further details on individual schemes is at Appendix 6 in the LDP.
Regarding the site, the LDP notes that consent had been given for supermarket uses on the old junior school site and so the site is allocated for food store / convenience and retail uses within the plan. Chimney’s Link is referenced as being part of a wider regeneration project for the centre of Fishguard, which includes the aforementioned development site. It is specifically noted as being a County Council Programmed Highway Scheme, to link A40 High Street to A487 West Street. A note is attached that outlines an expectation that implementation during the plan period (until 2021) is possible and that the concept is supported by Welsh Government.
7 Pembrokeshire County Council (2013). Adopted Local Development Plan. Available online: http://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/content.asp?id=27072&language [Accessed: 07/07/2017]
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 11
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
3. Existing Situation
3.1. Overview This Chapter of the TA describes the proposed development site’s existing uses and provides an audit of the surrounding transport network; including:
The nature of the surrounding area, including a summary of facilities and amenities; Existing transport network; Parking; and Transport safety
The effect the proposed development has on any of these provisions or conditions will be outlined in Chapter 4 and 6 respectively.
3.2. Surrounding Area
3.2.1. Local Area Fishguard is an important centre for North Pembrokeshire. As a result, there are a wide range of shops (including specialty and national high street chains) and services, including banks, based in the town centre along West Street (up to Clive Road) and High Street (up to the Co-Operative junction). These are supplemented with leisure facilities, including restaurants, public houses and hotels. In addition, the town is home to c.3,500 people (c.5,500 including Goodwick) according to the 2011 Census.
In addition to being a distinct regional centre, Fishguard is a tourist destination, well-placed for visitors to northern Pembrokeshire and the coast.
Figure 3-1 Fishguard Town Centre Amenities and Attractions
3.2.2. Proposed Development Site The proposed development site is located to the west of The Square in Fishguard, bordered by A487 West Street towards the north of the site and A40 High Street towards the south.
The site was occupied by the following:
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 12
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Co-Op supermarket; The Ship & Anchor Public House and Library; The former Fishguard Junior School; and Transition Bro Gwaun building.
The Junior School was vacated in 2011 and the Ship and Anchor Pub was acquired by Pembrokeshire County Council and is no longer trading.
Phase 1 of The Chimneys Link Scheme (which was approved on 20th Feb 2017, with work commencing shortly afterwards) comprised of the following:
Demolition of the rear function room of the Ship and Anchor public house; Demolition of parts of the former library building attached to the Ship and Anchor public house; Relocation of the Co-Op Supermarket customer entrance; and Landscaping and construction of a car park.
The Co-Op supermarket and Transition Bro Gwaun building are still trading.
3.2.3. Access to the Existing Site The site is currently accessed from the north via the minor arm of a priority junction with A487 West Street, and from the south via a minor arm of a priority junction with A40 High Street. These junctions are illustrated in Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3 respectively.
Figure 3-2 North Access (ex-school site), via A487 West Street
There are currently no give way markings at the northern access junction. The carriageway is in good condition up to the edge of the footway, where the quality deteriorates. No footways or street lighting is provided along this side road.
There are no specific provisions for cyclists at the junction.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 13
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 3-3 South Access (Co-Operative), via A40 High Street
The southern access point is more clearly demarcated, with give way and central white lines provided on the approach to the Co-op supermarket. Whilst this access road does not have street lighting, there are footways on both sides, with the westernmost footway extending furthest into the car park. There are no clear walkways within the Co-op car park.
There are no specific provisions for cyclists at the junction.
3.3. Existing Transport Network The transport network within central Fishguard is typical of that found in a rural Welsh town. Peak period congestion is a daily concern and parts of the existing transport infrastructure falls well below current design standards; leading to high levels of conflict between motorised and non-motorised users.
There are long standing concerns with regards to the suitability and safety of the existing transport network within Fishguard, specifically in relation to the narrowness of the highway network, lack of adequate pedestrian footways, on-street parking and the high occurrence of near misses (albeit based on anecdotal evidence).
3.3.1. Existing Road Network
Overview Fishguard’s road network radiates (as shown in Figure 3-4) from the centrally located 3-arm roundabout at The Square. The roundabout connects three road links which form part of the A40 and A487 Trunk Roads; clockwise from the east they are Main Street (A487), High Street (A40) and West Street (A487). Within the centre of Fishguard the A487 is bounded by residential and commercial properties. Other local distributor roads provide access off the A487 to residential properties and car parking as well as access to servicing for local businesses.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 14
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 3-4 Fishguard Town Centre Amenities and Attractions
There is currently no vehicular route through the development site, although the northern part (school side) is accessible via a priority junction with the A487 West Street and the southern part (Co-Op side) is accessed via a priority junction with the A40 High Street.
Details of the key road links within the study area are discussed in the following sections of this chapter.
A487 Main Street
Main Street links Fishguard (The Square) to Lower Fishguard and beyond largely following the Welsh coast. A photograph of Main Street is provided in Figure 3-5.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 15
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 3-5 A487 Main Street
Multiple properties and businesses front directly onto this carriageway, and it connects with a number of local distributor roads including Hamilton Street, Kensington Street and Tower Hill. A 30mph speed limit is in place from The Square until the edge of Lower Fishguard where the speed limit decreases to 20mph. A 30mph speed limit is applied to the winding incline out of Lower Fishguard, with the national speed limit applying beyond.
Main Street is two-way for its length. Within Fishguard town the width is constrained and no central white lines are in place. A single yellow line is in place on both sides of the carriageway from the eastern edge to The Square, indicating that no stopping or waiting is permitted between 8am and 6pm. A Pelican Crossing is provided across Main Street near to The Square junction. The carriageway is in good condition, all road markings are clear and there are street lights along its length.
A40 High Street The A40 along the southern side of the development site continues approximately 1200m to the A40. The A40 bypasses Fishguard Town Centre.
A photograph of High Street is provided in Figure 3-6.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 16
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 3-6 A40 High Street
Multiple properties and businesses are accessed directly from the carriageway, and numerous junctions provide access to key attractions (such as Lota Park and Fishguard Holiday Park), residential areas (such as Lota Park Road and Y-Gongol) and also Maesgwyn Road, which acts as a direct link to Dyffryn on a narrow track.
The road is open to two-way traffic for its length, and is subject to a 30mph speed limit within Fishguard, with the national speed limit applying beyond. To the west of the A487 junction with Lota Park Road there are no parking restrictions in place. To the east, single yellow lines are provided on both sides of the carriageway which indicates no parking or waiting from 8am to 6pm. Approximately 100m to the east of Lota Park Road, the carriageway narrows and no central white line is provided. This continues to The Square. The carriageway is in good condition, all road markings are clear and there are street lights along its length.
A487 West Street From the Square, the A487 runs along a north-westerly alignment to a roundabout junction with the A40. This section of the A487 commences as West Street (nearest The Square) before becoming Vergam Terrace and finally Windyhall as it approaches the A40 / A487 roundabout.
A photograph of West Street is provided in Figure 3-7.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 17
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 3-7 A487 West Street
As well as being an important local and strategic road link, access to a large number of residential roads and car parks are provided off this section of the A487.
A 30mph speed limit is in place from the A40 / A487 junction through to The Square. The carriageway allows two-way traffic and has a central white line marked from the existing school site junction to the A40 junction. For a short section, to the east of the school access junction, the carriageway is narrow and no central white line is provided, although this is provided again after a distance of approximately 20m.
Single yellow lines (no stopping or waiting 8am-6pm) are provided from the junction with Clive Road to The Square. On the northern side of the carriageway the line is continuous, with some charged street parking provided on the southern side adjacent to the access junction to the school (c.7 spaces + 1 disabled space). The carriageway is in good condition, all road markings are clear and there are street lights along its length.
A40 High Street and A487 West Street Traffic Constraints The analysis presented above highlights the narrow carriageway widths and pinch points that currently exist along both A40 High Street and A487 West Street. These constraints have a significant effect on the capacity and safety of the Trunk Road network passing through Fishguard leading to regular congestion problems and near misses involving larger vehicles (e.g. buses, delivery vehicles and agricultural vehicles) in particular.
A plan illustrating the existing carriageway widths through A487 West Street and A40 High Street is provided in Appendix D.
The proposal to develop a new link road within the masterplan area and the associated Trunk Road Improvements (as outlined in Chapter 4 of this report), aims to address both the Welsh Government and South Wales Trunk Road Agent (SWTRA) long-term concerns with regards the constraints outlined above. The proposals also seek to address poor pedestrian and cyclist provision within the town which are discussed in the following sections of this report.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 18
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
3.3.2. Pedestrians Despite the centre of Fishguard hosting a variety of shops, services and attractions, the pedestrian provision in terms of footways are limited. This is mainly as a result of the narrow streets which are constrained by the building line and the need to accommodate two-way working. Many of the provided footways are sub-standard.
The existing pedestrian network is illustrated in Figure 3-8.
Figure 3-8 Fishguard Pedestrian Network
The footway and footpath network is varied in Fishguard Town Centre. Many footways, including on A40 High Street are of unsuitably narrow widths. Manual for Streets (2007)8 states that recommended footway widths are 2m as this allows two wheelchairs to pass one another. 1.5m could be regarded as the minimum acceptable, allowing a pushchair and pedestrian to pass one another. 1m is recognised as the absolute minimum width, used to pass obstacles.
In many cases, footways on key roads are either too narrow (<1m), or are not provided. This is despite shops and services being accessed directly from these footways. Figure 3-8 illustrates the footways which were estimated to be >1m, however as described above this is an absolute minimum and should only be used to pass an obstacle, and not as a continuous length. If a minimum width of 1.5m is applied, very few parts of the existing footway network would meet this standard, making it difficult for pedestrians and impossible for wheelchair users.
3.3.3. Cycling Sustrans’ National Cycle Network (NCN) is a series of safe, traffic-free paths and quiet on-road cycling and walking routes between all major UK towns and cities. Fishguard is located on Route 4 and Route 47 of the NCN. Route 4 is a long-distance route between London and Fishguard, whilst Route 47 links Newport with Fishguard.
8 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/341513/pdfmanforstreets.pdf
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 19
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
These routes in Fishguard form part the Celtic Trail East or the Celtic Trail West depending on which route is taken.
Cycle parking is also currently provided at two locations, as indicated on Figure 3-9.
Figure 3-9 Cycling in and around Fishguard
3.3.4. Bus Fishguard is served by local and regional bus services with all services converging at The Square. Route details are provided in Table 3-1.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 20
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Table 3-1 Bus Services: Fishguard
Route number Route Service (operator) 404 Fishguard to St Davids 3 per day, daily (Richards Brothers) (via Porthgain) 0735 / 1110 / 1600 405 Poppit Rocket 3 per day, daily Newport to Cardigan (Richards Brothers) 1000 / 1400 / 1800 410 Fishguard Square Mon -Sat: half hourly, first: 0755 hours, last: 1825 hours (Richards Brothers) (via Fishguard Harbour) Sunday: No service 413 Mon-Sat: every 2 hours, first: 0705 hours, last: 1640 hours Fishguard to St Davids (Richards Brothers) Sunday: No service Traws Cymru: Mon-Sat: hourly, first: 0725 hours, last: 1950 hours (to Haverfordwest), first: 0748 hours, last: 2028 (to T5 Aberystwyth to Haverfordwest Aberystwyth). (Richards Brothers) (via Newquay – Sunday: 4 per day. Cardigan) 0945 / 1430 / 1745 / 2009
There are two bus stops at the Square, one northbound and one southbound, both of which are located in laybys. The southbound layby is located on the roundabout which allows buses to approach and stop from all directions and to depart in all directions. Both bus stops at The Square include bus flagpoles with written timetables and live departure screens; however, seating and shelters are not provided.
Additional bus stops are located adjacent to the Maesgwyn Road / A40 priority junction and along the A487 Vergam Terrace.
Bus / Coach Infrastructure As noted previously, the converging point for bus services in Fishguard is currently The Square. There are two bus stops here, one northbound and one southbound: both located in laybys as shown in Figure 3-10.
Figure 3-10 The Square Bus Stops
Southbound Layby Northbound Layby
The bus stops located at The Square consist of the following passenger facilities:
Bus flagpole with written timetable; and Live departure screens.
There are no waiting shelters or benches provided.
The bus stops adjacent to the Maesgwyn Road / A40 junction consist of:
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 21
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Southbound: o Bus shelter; o Raised boarding kerb; and o Timetable. Northbound: o Raised boarding kerb.
Two bus stops are also provided on A487 Vergam Terrace, but these have no flagpoles, timetables or shelters.
3.3.5. Rail
Rail Services Rail services are available from the following stations:
Fishguard and Goodwick Station; and Fishguard Harbour Station.
Fishguard and Goodwick station is 1.1 miles from The Square which equates to a circa 23 minutes’ walk. Footways and footpaths are provided for this distance. In addition, both rail stations are serviced by the 410 Fishguard Town bus service.
The rail services are the same at both stations and a breakdown is provided in Table 3-2. Fishguard Harbour Station is located at the end of the West Wales Line from Swansea.
Table 3-2 Rail Services: Fishguard Harbour (& Fishguard and Goodwick) (May 2017 timetable)
Mon-Sat Sun Operator Dep. Fishguard Destination Dep. Fishguard Destination Harbour (hours) Harbour (hours) 0650 Clarbeston Road 1240 Cardiff Central 0750 Manchester Piccadilly 2303 Carmarthen 0954 Carmarthen Arriva Trains Wales 1250 Cardiff Central 1908 Carmarthen 2214 Carmarthen *Note: Sat departure times vary by +/-10 minutes
Rail infrastructure Fishguard and Goodwick station has a shelter with seating and live train information. Fishguard Harbour station has a waiting room and platform canopy.
There are drop-off areas at both stations and both stations are accessible on foot or by bus from The Square.
3.3.6. Public Transport Summary Public transport in the vicinity of the site is considered to provide a good level of accessibility. There are frequent bus services providing a regular service linking to much of surrounding area, with two railway stations providing regular services further afield.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 22
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
4. Personal Injury Accidents
Transport safety is one of the principle concerns which underpins the requirement for the Trunk Road Improvement Scheme discussed in the following Chapter of the TA. These concerns relate to both actual and anecdotal evidence.
Personal Injury Accident (PIA) data for the highway network in the vicinity of the proposed development has been reviewed for the latest 5-year period; 01/06/2012 to 31/05/2017. The full PIA data has been included in Appendix A. It revealed that;
There was a total of 17 accidents reports in the area across the period; resulting in; A total of 18 casualties, none were classified as ‘fatal’, six as ‘serious’ and 12 as ‘slight’.
The study area is presented as Figure 4-1.
Figure 4-1 PIA Study Area
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 23
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 4-1 illustrates that the majority of the accidents (12) occurred on the A40 High Street, A487 West Street and A487 Main Street.
These PIA’s (from west to east) are summarised in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 PIA Summary – Vicinity of the Proposed Development
Date PIC No. Severity Year Weather Road Surface Time of Day Day/Night (dd/mm) Darkness Raining Slight 2015 Wet / Damp 1625 (no street 29/12 (with high winds) lighting) CP28315 Description: A car (travelling to Fishguard) and a goods vehicle (<3.5t) (leaving Fishguard) collided at the A40 Roundabout. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Illness or disability, mental or physical (Very Likely), Poor turn or manoeuvre (Very likely). Fine Serious 2015 Dry 1645 Daylight 08/10 (without high winds) CP20415 Description: A car driven by an Australian national (visiting) has got the brake and accelerator mixed up and crashed through the wall of a neighbouring property. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Other (Very likely). Fine Slight 2013 Dry 1622 - 06/10 (without high winds)
CP17613 Description: A car travelling west along High Street manoeuvred across the opposite carriageway (to turn right into the petrol station) into the path of a car travelling in the opposite direction. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Poor turn or manoeuvre (Very likely), Failed to look properly (Very likely). Fine Slight 2014 Dry 1052 - 13/03 (without high winds) CP06514 Description: A car travelling west along High Street stopped at some stationary vehicles. A following car failed to stop in time, colliding with the rear. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Other (Very likely). Slight 2014 Unknown Dry 1131 - 20/02
CP03114 Description: A car struck a pedestrian to the rear when passing, causing minor injury to the arm, back and leg. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): None listed. Fine Slight 2015 Dry 1440 - 21/02 (without high winds) CP02815 Description: A car struck a pedestrian’s arm walking towards Fishguard Square on narrow stretch of road whilst passing. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): None listed. Fine Slight 2016 Dry 1030 Daylight 05/07 (without high winds) CP11716 Description: A car struck a pedestrian’s elbow walking along Fishguard High Street from The Square along a narrow footpath, causing slight bruising. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): None listed. Raining Serious 2012 Wet / Damp 0755 - 02/09 (without high winds) CP22212 Description: A pedestrian was struck to their right side by a car whilst waiting to cross the road. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Other (Very likely). Fine CP24812 Serious 2012 Dry 1125 - 29/08 (without high winds)
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 24
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Description: A motorcycle (>500cc) collided with a goods vehicle (>3.5t) when they undertook a wider than normal exit route from the roundabout as visibility was partially obscured by a building. The goods vehicle (>3.5t) due to its size overhung the white line. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Road layout (eg bend, hill etc.) (Very likely), Poor turn or manoeuvre (Very likely). Fine Slight 2016 Dry 1300 Daylight 27/06 (without high winds)
CP11016 Description: A car pulled into a parking bay (outside of the shops) whilst a car was just pulling out, the car pulling in decided to pull forward some more into the space, hitting the accelerator instead of the brake. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Loss of control (Very likely). Fine Slight 2015 Dry 1530 Daylight 30/09 (without high winds) CP21715 Description: A child ran out into the side of an oncoming car. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): None listed. Fine Serious 2014 Dry 0847 - 25/11 (without high winds) CP21114 Description: A car travelling to Fishguard has collided with a School Crossing Patrol Officer. Contributory Factors listed (Confidence): Other (Very likely).
The development proposals seek to address the long-standing concerns with regards to the suitability and safety of the existing transport network within Fishguard, specifically in relation to the narrowness of the highway network and lack of adequate pedestrian footways in the vicinity of Fishguard Square. Anecdotal evidence suggests that near misses and safety concerns are a significant problem.
The PIA summarised in Table 4-1 reinforces these concerns, with three ‘slight’ accidents reported along the A40 High Street (in the vicinity of the proposed development) involving vehicles colliding with pedestrians walking along narrow footways. Furthermore a ‘serious’ accident was reported on A487 Main Street (to the east of The Square) where a pedestrian was struck to their right side by a car whilst waiting to cross the road.
The development proposals would further mitigate against the ‘serious’ accident reported in 2012; where a motorcycle (>500cc) undertook a wider than normal exit route from The Square roundabout (as visibility was partially obscured by a building), colliding with an oncoming goods vehicle (>3.5t), which overhung the white line due to its size.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 25
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
5. Proposed Development
5.1. Overview The proposal, known as Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme, reconfigures the existing site, facilitated by the creation of a new link road, known as Chimneys Link Road.
The proposal to develop a new link road within the site aims to address long-term concerns by both the Welsh Government and SWTRA in regards to the A40 High Street and A487 West Street. As highlighted in Chapter 3, the footways are not to standard, there are safety concerns regarding non-motorised users, and the roads are narrow and difficult to negotiate under the current system. Should permission for this scheme be granted, there would be an opportunity to redesign the current A40 High Street and A487 West Street to improve safety, streetscape and meet highways standards. These improvements could be undertaken at a later stage as permitted development.
For the purpose of this TA it has been assumed that both the proposed development and Trunk Road improvement schemes would be delivered simultaneously. The transport impact of the scheme is considered on this basis; with both schemes forming part of the ‘With Development / Do Something’ scenario.
This Chapter of the TA provides a description of the proposed development and the associated Trunk Road improvements.
5.2. Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme The Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme (the “scheme”) affects 1.8 hectares of land within Fishguard Town Centre and provides the foundations for redevelopment of the site.
5.2.1. The Proposals The proposals for the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme includes the following:
New link road through the site and corresponding accesses, associated pedestrian and cycling routes and street lighting; Drainage infrastructure (surface and foul); Introduction of improved green space and enhanced public realm; New bus stop area, bus shelters, benches; Demolition of the former Fishguard Junior School, its outbuildings, the school canteen, the pitched roof library building and Transition Bro Gwaun; Construction of a bat house; Alterations to the delivery area of the Co-operative; and Construction of a Bat House.
A proposed site layout plan is shown in Figure 5-1.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 26
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Figure 5-1 Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme – Site Layout Plan
5.2.2. Access Access to the site will be located off A40 High Street with an exit point at A487 West Street; with both junctions proposed as priority junctions. To ensure continuity of the Trunk Road network through Fishguard, Chimneys Link Road will be trunked. Consequently, priority at the new junctions either end of Chimneys Link Road is given to the dominant trunk road movement. Furthermore, creating a give-way for road users heading north from A40 High Street to Chimneys Link Road will assist with self-enforcing the 20mph speed restriction.
Junction modelling of the proposed access and egress junctions (see Section 6) show no issues with traffic building up and affecting upstream junctions.
5.2.3. Chimney’s Link Road The key component of the scheme is the provision of Chimneys Link Road (c.240m in length) joining the A40 High Street with the A487 West Street. The link road will be one-way with associated pedestrian and cyclist provision. A new bus focal point is also proposed within the development site.
5.2.4. Public Transport Provision The proposed bus focal point allows for three buses to stop at any one time which has been agreed following consultation with local bus operators and PCC. It has been designed such that buses can come and go independently of one another and will allow for one of the bus stops to serve as a coach drop-off for cruise ships.
The bus focal point will also allow for the existing bus stop arrangements at The Square to be formalised and will assist in removing waiting buses which create conflict areas. Following consultation, it was agreed that The Square would retain a single bus stop in both directions to minimise the impact on existing bus links; however, these remaining bus stops will be drop-off and pick-up only with no waiting, which will reduce conflicts and congestion and improve the streetscape at The Square.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 27
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
5.3. Trunk Road Improvements The new road link through the development site (Chimneys Link Road) supports the formation of a one-way gyratory system in the centre of Fishguard. As shown in Figure 5-2 below, the one-way gyratory would operate in a clock-wise direction with Chimneys Link providing the new (south to north) connection between A40 High Street and A487 West Street.
Figure 5-2 Development Site and Indicative Link Road
The Trunk Road Improvement Scheme provides an opportunity to address existing transport constraints along the A40 High Street and A487 West Street and to improve accessibility within the surrounding area. As outlined earlier, both the Welsh Government and SWTRA have significant concerns about these constraints. With a one-way gyratory operating along sections of A40 High Street and A487 West Street, the existing carriageway width would be modified to remove existing footway pinch points, to facilitate footway widening and to provide improved visibility for all transport users. The scheme would also encourage sustainable transport choices for local trips and would enable a new bus focal point to be provided away from ‘The Square’.
Should permission for the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme be granted, the Trunk Road Improvements could be undertaken at a later stage as permitted development.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 28
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
6. Traffic Impact Assessment
6.1. Introduction Chapter 6 considers the traffic situation in the vicinity of the site with and without the proposed development (Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme proposals and the associated Trunk Road Improvement Scheme) in place. As part of this analysis capacity assessments have been undertaken for the following junctions:
The roundabout at The Square – with and without the proposed development in place; The existing Co-Operative Supermarket access junction – without the proposed development in place; Chimneys Link Road (Co-Op) / A40 High Street priority junction – with the proposed development in place; and Chimneys Link Road / A487 West Street priority junction – with the proposed development in place.
A description of these junctions along with a location plan is provided in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4.
6.2. Assessment Scenarios Junction capacity analysis has been undertaken for the following weekday peak periods:
AM Peak: 0830-0930; and PM Peak: 1700-1800.
The assessments have been undertaken to determine operational conditions for a 2018 Opening Year and a 2028 Design Year.
6.3. Traffic Flows Traffic flow data for the existing road network was obtained from the following traffic surveys:
2011 tuning count survey at Fishguard Square (roundabout); and 2016 turning count survey at the existing A40 High Street / Co-Op Supermarket access junction:
The 2011 and 2016 flows were growthed to 2018 (Opening Year) and 2028 (Design Year) levels using TemPro / NTM (version 7.2) ‘Average Weekday’ growth factor derived for the Fishguard area using the road type ‘Urban – Trunk’.
The calculated ‘Average Weekday’ growth factor between 2011 and 2018 was 1.0939; The calculated ‘Average Weekday’ growth factor between 2016 and 2018 was 1.0267; and The calculated ‘Average Weekday’ growth factor between 2018 and 2028 was 1.1024.
The 2018 Opening Year and 2028 Design Year flows described above were used for the ‘without development’ junction capacity assessments.
6.4. Junction Analysis The junction capacity analysis has considered the following scenarios:
‘Do Nothing’ o Without the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme in place (i.e. no link road and associated development); ‘Do Something’ o With the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme in place (i.e. new link road and associated development).
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 29
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Junction capacity analysis was subsequently undertaken in line with the following:
Square Roundabout; o 2018 AM & PM – ‘Do Nothing’; o 2028 AM & PM – ‘Do Nothing’; o 2018 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’; and o 2028 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’. Co-Op existing access; o 2018 AM & PM – ‘Do Nothing’; o 2028 AM & PM – ‘Do Nothing’. Chimneys Link Road (Co-Operative) / A40 High Street; o 2018 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’; and o 2028 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’. Chimneys Link Road / A487 West Street Priority Junction; o 2018 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’; o 2028 AM & PM – ‘Do Something’.
The junction analysis has been undertaken using the ARCADY (Roundabouts) and PICADY (Priority Intersections) modules of the Junctions 9 programme. Traffic flows for each scenario is provided in Appendix B.
The Junctions 9 programme, produced by the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), is an industry standard software package used for the analysis of roundabouts and priority junctions. The capacity analysis results are expressed in terms of the Ratio of Flow to Capacity (RFC), delay (seconds), maximum queue (Vehicles) and Level of Service (LOS). The theoretical capacity of each approach is taken at the RFC value of 1.0 and the design capacity is taken at an RFC value of 0.85 (i.e. 85% of the theoretical capacity). A junction is therefore considered to operate within design capacity if all approaches have an RFC of less than 0.85. The analysis has used the ‘flat’ profile, which assumes the demand is even split across the peak hour.
6.4.1. The Roundabout at The Square The ARCADY capacity analysis results for the 2018 and 2028 Opening Year and Design Year scenarios are provided in Tables 6-1 and 6-2 respectively. The full results are set out in Appendix C.
Table 6-1 The Square (Roundabout) – ARCADY Analysis Results 2018
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Scenario Arm Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS RFC LOS (Veh) (s) (Veh) (s) West St 0.4 7.61 0.30 A 0.4 7.26 0.30 A ‘Do Nothing’ Main St 1.3 14.16 0.56 B 1.2 13.37 0.55 B High St 0.5 8.46 0.34 A 0.7 8.84 0.41 A West St 0.8 8.87 0.44 A 0.9 9.10 0.47 A ‘Do Main St 1.3 14.35 0.56 B 1.3 14.08 0.56 B Something’ High St 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 30
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Table 6-2 The Square (Roundabout) – ARCADY Analysis Results 2028
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Scenario Arm Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS RFC LOS (Veh) (s) (Veh) (s) West St 0.5 8.01 0.34 A 0.5 7.67 0.33 A ‘Do Nothing’ Main St 1.6 16.45 0.62 C 1.5 15.45 0.61 C High St 0.6 9.13 0.38 A 0.8 9.72 0.46 A West St 0.9 9.65 0.48 A 1.1 10.02 0.52 B ‘Do Main St 1.7 16.83 0.63 C 1.6 16.51 0.62 C Something’ High St 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
The results presented in Tables 6-1 and 6-2 show that the roundabout at ‘The Square’ is forecast to operate within capacity in all scenarios assessed. Furthermore, the proposed development is shown to have a negligible impact on the operation of both the A487 West Street and A40 High Street arms of the roundabout.
6.4.2. Co-Op Existing / Proposed Chimneys Link Road Access The PICADY capacity analysis results for the existing Co-Op Supermarket access junction and the Chimneys Link Road access junction on A40 High Street are provided in Tables 6-3 and 6-4 respectively. The full results are set out in Appendix C.
Table 6-3 ‘Do Nothing’ and ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2018
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Scenario Movement Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS RFC LOS (Veh) (s) (Veh) (s) B-C 0.0 6.30 0.03 A 0.1 6.58 0.08 A ‘Do Nothing’* B-A 0.0 8.99 0.03 A 0.1 9.80 0.09 A C-AB 0.0 6.77 0.02 A 0.1 7.01 0.10 A B-C 0.4 7.47 0.26 A 0.5 7.64 0.32 A ‘Do B-A 0.6 9.27 0.38 A 0.6 9.40 0.39 A Something’** C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A *A= High St (W), B= Co-Operative Access, C= High St (East) **A= Chimneys Link, B= High St (East), C= High St (West)
Table 6-4 ‘Do Nothing’ and ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2028
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Scenario Movement Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS RFC LOS (Veh) (s) (Veh) (s) B-C 0.0 6.41 0.03 A 0.1 6.75 0.09 A ‘Do Nothing’* B-A 0.0 9.21 0.04 A 0.1 10.22 0.11 B C-AB 0.0 6.85 0.02 A 0.1 7.14 0.11 A B-C 0.4 8.06 0.30 A 0.6 8.37 0.36 A ‘Do B-A 0.7 10.19 0.42 B 0.8 10.37 0.44 B Something’** C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A *A= High St (W), B= Co-Operative Access, C= High St (East) **A= Chimneys Link, B= High St (East), C= High St (West)
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 31
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
The results presented in Tables 6-3 and 6-4 show that both A40 High Street priority junctions are forecast to operate within capacity in all scenarios assessed. Furthermore, the new priority junction that will provide access onto Chimneys Link Road is shown to operate well within capacity even in the 2028 Design Year.
6.4.3. Chimneys Link Road / A487 West Street Priority Junction The PICADY capacity analysis results for the new priority junction proposed on A487 West Street (Chimneys Link Road exit junction) are provided in Table 6-5. The full results are set out in Appendix C.
Table 6-5 ‘Do Something’ – PICADY Analysis Results 2018 and 2028
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Scenario Movement Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS RFC LOS (Veh) (s) (Veh) (s) B-AC 0.5 8.73 0.33 A 0.5 8.59 0.33 A 2018 C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A B-AC 0.6 9.37 0.37 A 0.6 9.26 0.37 A 2028 C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A *A= Chimneys Link, B= West Street (N), C= West Street (S)
The new priority junction proposed on A487 West Street is shown to operate well within capacity even in the 2028 Design Year.
The existing priority junction formed by A487 West Street and the former Fishguard Primary School operates on an informal basis with no road marking currently in place. Furthermore, on-site observations showed minimal traffic movements to / from the junction’s minor arm during peak hours. Consequently, a capacity assessment of this junction has not been undertaken.
6.5. Conclusion The analysis presented in this chapter shows that the three junctions proposed as part of the new one-way gyratory within Fishguard Town Centre have sufficient capacity to accommodate forecasts traffic flows in the 2028 Design Year.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 32
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
7. Transport Implementation Strategy
7.1. Introduction
Technical Advice Note (TAN) 18: Transport, indicates that the TA process should include the production of a Transport Implementation Strategy (TIS) which should: 1. Set objectives and targets relating to managing travel demand for the development and set out the infrastructure, demand management measures and financial contributions necessary to achieve them. 2. Detail the measures proposed to improve access by public transport, walking and cycling and reduce the number and impacts of the motorised journeys associated with the proposal. This section of the TA outlines the TIS for the proposed Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme.
7.2. Chimneys Link Transport Implementation Strategy The Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme will regenerate an underutilised area of Fishguard Town Centre whilst also making provision for a link road to support a wider initiative to relieve Trunk Road congestion and address existing transport constraints within the town. As outlined in Chapter 3 (Existing Situation), A40 High Street and A487 West Street regularly experience traffic congestion due to narrow carriageway widths and the presence of numerous pinch points. Footpaths along these roads are also narrow, substandard and in some cases absent.
As outlined in Chapter 5 (Proposed Development), the development proposals combined with the Trunk Road Improvement Scheme will transform the transport system within Fishguard Town Centre. The new road link through the development site (Chimneys Link Road) supports the formation of a one-way gyratory system in the centre of Fishguard. The one-way gyratory would operate in a clock-wise direction with Chimneys Link providing the new (south to north) connection between A40 High Street and A487 West Street.
As outlined in Chapter 6 (Traffic Impact Assessment), the modelled road network is shown to have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposals i.e. formation of the one gyratory. From a transport perspective, the development proposals combined with the Trunk Road Improvement Scheme, will also provide the following benefits:
Increased accessibility by sustainable modes within the town; with Chimneys Link Road providing a new shared use path for pedestrians and cyclists between A40 High Street and A487 West Street. The new shared use path will link to existing and improved provision within the town centre. Provide capacity and safety improvements (for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians) along A40 High Street and A487 West Street: with formation of the new one-way gyratory enabling: 1. Carriageway reconfiguration on A40 High Street and A487 West Street to remove existing pinch points; and 2. Footpath Widening Provide a new bus focal point which will reduce the time spent by buses currently waiting at The Square. Buses waiting at The Square is currently a regular source of congestion within the town. Provide access to the scheme area.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 33
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
8. Summary and Conclusions
Atkins has been instructed by Pembrokeshire County Council (PCC) – Transportation & Environment to prepare and submit a planning application for the redevelopment of land within Fishguard Town Centre, Pembrokeshire.
The proposed development area, was originally occupied by a Co-Op supermarket, former Fishguard Junior School, Transition Bro Gwaun building and the acquired former Ship and Anchor public house and associated pitched roof library.
Phase 1 of this scheme (which was approved on 20th Feb 2017, with work commencing shortly afterwards) comprised of the demolition of the rear function room of the Ship and Anchor public house, as well as parts of the former library building attached to the Public House. Landscaping and construction of a car park was also undertaken along with relocation of the Co-Op supermarket building entrance.
The current proposal (referred to as the Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme) expands on the existing work carried out with the construction of a new (one-way) link road and further proposed improvements (including a new focal bus area, alterations to the existing Co-Op supermarket delivery area, and demolition of the building currently occupied by ‘Transition Bro Gwaun’).
The transport network within central Fishguard is typical of that found in a rural Welsh town, with peak period congestion being a daily concern. Despite the centre of Fishguard hosting a variety of shops, services and attractions, the pedestrian provision in terms of footways are limited. This is mainly as a result of the narrow streets which are constrained by the building line and the need to accommodate two-way working. Many of the provided footways are sub-standard, leading to high levels of conflict between motorised and non- motorised users, resulting in PIAs and a high number of occurrence of near misses (albeit based on anecdotal evidence).
Public transport in the vicinity of the site is considered to provide a good level of accessibility. There are frequent bus services providing a regular service encompassing much of surrounding area, with two railway stations providing regular services further afield.
The proposal, known as Chimneys Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme, further reconfigures the existing site, facilitated by the creation of a new link road, known as Chimneys Link Road.
The proposal to develop a new link road within the site aims to address long-term concerns by both the Welsh Government and SWTRA in regards to the A40 High Street and A487 West Street. As previously alluded to, the footways are not to standard, there are safety concerns regarding non-motorised users, and the roads are narrow and difficult to negotiate under the current system. Should permission for this scheme be granted, there would be an opportunity to redesign the current A40 High Street and A487 West Street to improve safety, streetscape and meet highways standards. These improvements could be undertaken at a later stage as permitted development.
With a one-way gyratory operating along sections of A40 High Street and A487 West Street, the existing carriageway width would be modified to remove existing footway pinch points, to facilitate footway widening and to provide improved visibility for all transport users. The scheme would also encourage sustainable transport choices for local trips and would enable a new bus focal point to be provided away from ‘The Square’.
The analysis presented in this TA illustrates that the three junctions forming part of the new one-way gyratory within Fishguard Town Centre have sufficient capacity to accommodate forecasts traffic flows in the 2028 Design Year.
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 34
Appendices
Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Appendix A. PIA Data
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 36
Colour-coding by SEVERITY Total Accidents (17) Fatal (0) Serious (5) Slight (12) Other (0)
Total Casualties (18)
Police_ref: CP01813
Police_ref: CP21114 Police_ref: CP13416
Police_ref: CP10514
Police_ref: CP21715
Police_ref: CP11016
Police_ref: CP24812 Police_ref: CP22212
Police_ref: CP11716 Police_ref: CP02815
Police_ref: CP03114
Police_ref: CP06514
Police_ref: CP22214
Police_ref: CP10815 Police_ref: CP20415
Police_ref: CP17613
Police_ref: CP28315
Her Majesty's Office (c) Crown Copyright SCALE NTS Fishguard This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the DATE 18/07/2017 Personal Injury Collisions Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office + Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown DRAWING No. 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil CLTA 60mths Plan.pdf proceedings. Clare_williams@ Pembrokeshire County Council DRAWN BY Licence No: 100023344 (2017) pembrokeshire.gov.uk TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP24812 29/08/2012 Time 1125 Vehicles 2.00 Casualties 1.00 Serious E:195751 N: 237017 First Road: A 487 Road Type 1 Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Roundabout Give way or controlled A 40 Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Road layout (eg bend, hill etc.) Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 001 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
COLLISION OCCURRED AS V1 MOTORCYCLE TOOK A WIDER THAN NORMAL EXIT ROUTE FROM R/BOUT AS VISIBILITY WAS PARTIALLY OBSCURRED BY A BUILDING & HE COLLIDED WITH V2 LORRY WHICH DUE TO ITS SIZE OVERHUNG THE WHITE LINE. Occurred on WEST STREET N/A N/A MARKET SQUARE FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Motorcycle over 500cc Turning left Vehicle movement from E to NW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Leaving roundabout First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 53 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659HG VRM: P425PNF
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 53 Male Driver/rider Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode SA659HG Seatbelt Vehicle Reference 2 Goods over 3.5 tonnes and under 7.5 Turning left Vehicle movement from NW tonnesto E mgw No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering roundabout First impact Offside Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 49 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA678QS VRM: KN60DWK
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 1 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP01813 17/01/2013 Time 2130 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195520 N: 237386 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Pri Drive Give way or controlled Unclassified Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Darkness: street lights present and lit Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Failed to look properly Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
CASUALTY WAS WALKING ON PAVEMENT NR TO RAILWAYMANS CLUB IN BRODOG TERRACE. CASUALTY WAS CROSSING CAR PARK ENTRANCE WHEN UNKNOWN V1 REVERSED BACKWARDS & STRUCK CASUALTY CAUSING HER TO FALL OVER. V1 THEN DROVE OFF WITHOUT STOPPING. CASUALTY CAN OFFE Occurred on BRODOG TERRACE NR RAILWAYMANS CLUB N/A 0020W RAILWAYMAN'S CLUB/CAR PARK FISHGUARD (N/A) Vehicle Reference 1 Car Reversing Vehicle movement from E to N No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering main road First impact Back Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver Not traced Hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: 1 VRM: 9
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 71 Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659NW Seatbelt On footpath / verge S bound
Movement U/K
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 2 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP17613 06/10/2013 Time 1622 Vehicles 2.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195351 N: 236723 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Pri Drive Give way or controlled Unclassified Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: Failed to look properly Vehicle 001 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V1 TRAV ALONG HIGH STREET IN DIRECTION OF HAVERFORDWEST. V2 TRAV IN OPP DIRECTION IN DIRECTION OF FISHGUARD TOWN CENTRE. V1 THEN BEGAN TO MANOEUVRE ACROSS THE OPP C/W SO AS TO TURN RIGHT INTO PETROL STATION INTO PATH OF ONCOMING V2. THE FRONT OF V Occurred on HIGH STREET PENDRE N/A PETROL STATION FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Turning right Vehicle movement from NE to NW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Leaving main road First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 28 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: AL12JY VRM: GJ53WHU
Vehicle Reference 2 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from SW to NE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Jct Approach First impact Front Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 26 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA625EX VRM: WV51YAE
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 2 Age: 22 Female Passenger Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA625EX Seatbelt Front seat
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 3 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP03114 20/02/2014 Time 1131 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195558 N: 236846 First Road: A 487 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Unknown Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: Elsewhere DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V1 (UNKNOWN) STRUCK PEDESTRIAN TO THE REAR WHEN PASSING CAUSING MINOR INJURY TO ARM, BACK & LEG. NOT REPORTED AT THE TIME & NO DETAILS OF OFFENDING V1 KNOWN. Occurred on HIGH STREET N/A N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to SW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Did not impact Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver Not traced Hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: 1 VRM: 9
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 39 Male Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659BT Seatbelt Location U/K Direction Unknown
In carr back to traffic
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 4 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP06514 13/03/2014 Time 1052 Vehicles 2.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195496 N: 236802 First Road: A 40 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Other Vehicle 2 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V2 TRAV UP HIGH STREET IN DIRECTION OF HAVERFORDWEST. V2 CAME TO A HALT BEFORE SOME STATIONARY VEH'S. V1 TRAV IN SAME DIRECTION. V1 UNABLE TO STOP IN TIME & FRONT OF V1 COLLIDED WITH REAR OF V2 WHICH WAS STATIONARY. Occurred on HIGH STREET 74 N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to SW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 34 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659DJ VRM: W572KAB
Vehicle Reference 2 Car Going ahead but held up Vehicle movement from NE to SW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Back Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 22 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659LQ VRM: CV63YDD
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 2 Age: 22 Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659LQ Seatbelt
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 5 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP10514 30/05/2014 Time 1040 Vehicles 2.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195557 N: 237255 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Other Give way or controlled Unclassified Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Cyclist entering road from pavement Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: Buildings, road signs, street furniture Vehicle 001 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
AS V2 EXITED ACCESS ROAD, V1 CYCLIST RODE INTO IT AS HE WAS ON THE PAVEMENT & HAS UNSIGHTED TO V2 DRIVER DUE TO BUILDINGS. Occurred on BRODOG TERRACE 2 N/A ACCESS ROAD FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Pedal Cycle Going ahead other Vehicle movement from N to S No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering main road First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 9 Male Not hit and run Breath test Not applicable Driver Postcode: SA659GN VRM:
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 09 Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659GN Seatbelt Vehicle Reference 2 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from E to W No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering from slip road First impact Offside Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 37 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA680TA VRM: CU60DYV
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 6 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP21114 25/11/2014 Time 0847 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Serious E:195367 N: 237354 First Road: A 487 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control School crossing pat Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Other Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V1 TRAV TO FISHGUARD TOWN CENTRE. CASUALTY IS SCHOOL CROSSING PATROL LADY & WAS PERFORMING HER DUTIES IN HER YELLOW REFLECTIVE JACKET & SIGN. CASUALTY STEPPED OUT INTO ROAD TO DIRECT TRAFFIC. V1 CONTINUED ALONG THE ROAD & DRIVER HAS NOT SEEN SCHOO Occurred on VERGAM TERRACE CHURCH N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NW to SE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Front Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 18 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA420RR VRM: VE51EKP
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 70 Female Pedestrian Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode SA640EZ Seatbelt In carr elsewhere Standing still
Movement U/K
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 7 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP22214 20/10/2014 Time 2135 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195850 N: 236760 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Wet/Damp Darkness: street lights present and lit Raining without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Impaired by alcohol Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: Careless/Reckless/In a hurry Vehicle 001 Possible 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V1 TRAV UP WALLIS STREET BEING DRIVEN BY INTOXICATED DRIVER. V1 LEFT C/W & COLLIDED WITH A WALL ON N/S OUTSIDE PROSPECT HOUSE. DRIVER SUSTAINED INJURIES WHEN HIS HEAD COLLIDED WITH WINDSCREEN. DRIVER LEFT THE SCENE & RETURNED HOME WHERE HE WAS LAT Occurred on WALLIS STREET PROSPECT HOUSE N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from N to S No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Front Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: Oth perm objects Nearside Age of Driver 40 Male Hit and run Breath test Positive Driver Postcode: SA659HY VRM: T920ATS
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 40 Male Driver/rider Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659HY Seatbelt
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 8 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP10815 28/07/2015 Time 1005 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:194710 N: 236670 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 60 Junction Detail: Slip Road Give way or controlled Unclassified Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Defective brakes Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
V1 SOLE VEH TRAV DOWN U/C MAESGWYN ROAD, WHEN DRIVER TURNED LEFT INTO U/C MINOR ROAD DOWN A SHARP DESCENT. AS V1 TURNED, IT LOST ITS LOAD FROM ROOF RACK. DRIVER STOPPED V1 & ALIGHTED TOGETHER WITH FRONT SEAT PASSENGER TO RETRIEVE THE LOAD. AT THIS Occurred on MAESGWYN ROAD UNDER BRIDGE N/A 0005W TO GOODWICK FISHGUARD (N/A) Vehicle Reference 1 Goods 3.5 tonnes mgw and under Stopping Vehicle movement from E to W No tow / articulation On main carriageway Overturned Location at impact Jct Approach First impact Nearside Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 21 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659RF VRM: EU05YHN
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 21 Male Passenger Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA420XP Seatbelt Not car passenger
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 9 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP21715 30/09/2015 Time 1530 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195587 N: 237169 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Daylight:street lights present Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: Elsewhere DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
CHILD RAN OUT INTO THE SIDE OF ONCOMING V1. Occurred on WEST STREET CK SUPERMARKET N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NW to SE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Nearside Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 80 Male Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: SY108DP VRM: DU07TPO
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 13 Male Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659AD Seatbelt In carr not crossing Direction Unknown
Movement U/K
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 10 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP20415 08/10/2015 Time 1645 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 2.00 Serious E:195345 N: 236729 First Road: A 40 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Pri Drive Give way or controlled Unclassified Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Daylight: street lighting unknown Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Other Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
DRIVER IS AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL VISITING FROM AUSTRALIA & DRIVING V1 HIRE CAR. WHILST LEAVING PETROL STATION HAS GOT THE BRAKE & ACCELERATOR MIXED UP & CRASHED THROUGH WALL OF NEIGHBOURING PROPERTY. Occurred on HIGH STREET N/A N/A PETROL STATION FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Starting Vehicle movement from SE to NW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering main road First impact Front Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: Oth perm objects Did not leave carr Age of Driver 73 Female Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: 2 VRM: WU64YYF
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 69 Male Passenger Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode 2 Seatbelt Front seat
Casualty Reference: 2 Vehicle: 1 Age: 73 Female Driver/rider Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode 2 Seatbelt
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 11 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP28315 29/12/2015 Time 1625 Vehicles 2.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:194837 N: 236335 First Road: A 40 Road Type 1 Speed limit: 60 Junction Detail: Roundabout Give way or controlled A 40 Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Wet/Damp Darkness: no street lighting Raining with high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Illness or disability, mental or physical Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 001 Very Likely 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
FROM ACCOUNTS GIVEN BY BOTH DRIVERS, V1 WAS LEAVING R/BOUT ON A40 PRIOR TO FISHGUARD TOWN. V2 TRAV TO SAME R/BOUT ON A40 FROM FISHGUARD TO HAVERFORDWEST. BOTH COLLIED JUST AFTER CENTRAL KEEP LEFT BOLLARD. IMPACT O/S FRONT WING TO BOTH VEH'S. DRIVER V2 Occurred on FISHGUARD ROUNDABOUT N/A N/A TO GOODWICK FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from SW to NE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Leaving roundabout First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 96 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659BE VRM: KP56JRV
Vehicle Reference 2 Goods 3.5 tonnes mgw and under Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to N No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering roundabout First impact Front Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 21 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA659HP VRM: WP03XKV
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 2 Age: 16 Female Passenger Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659RQ Seatbelt Not car passenger
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 12 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP11016 27/06/2016 Time 1300 Vehicles 3.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195637 N: 237095 First Road: A 487 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Daylight:street lights present Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Loss of control Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
DISABLED DRIVER V1 PULLED INTO PARKING BAYS OUTSIDE SHOPS. V2 CAR IN FRONT OF HIM WAS JUST PULLING OUT. DRIVER V1 DECIDED TO PULL FORWARD SOME MORE INTO SPACE OF V2 BUT INSTEAD OF PRESSING BRAKE ON HIS AUTOMATIC CAR HE HAS PRESSED HARD ON ACCELERATOR I Occurred on WEST STREET SHOPS N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to NW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Front Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road Parked Vehicle Off road: Oth perm objects Nearside Age of Driver 68 Male Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SA640ER VRM: CU65PZH
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 66 Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659AD Seatbelt Location U/K Direction Unknown
Movement U/K Vehicle Reference 2 Car Starting Vehicle movement from N to S No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Back Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 69 Female Not hit and run Breath test Negative Driver Postcode: SY208AJ VRM: SW02ATF
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 13 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
Vehicle Reference 3 Car Parked Vehicle movement from Park to Parked No tow / articulation On main carriageway ed No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Back Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 61 Female Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: CF54DA VRM: CP54OOE
CP11716 05/07/2016 Time 1030 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195710 N: 236950 First Road: A 487 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Daylight:street lights present Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: Elsewhere DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
PEDESTRIAN WAS WALKING UP FISHGUARD HIGH STREET FROM THE SQUARE ALONG A NARROW FOOTPATH WHEN HER RIGHT ELBOW HAS BEEN STRUCK BY N/S WING MIRROR OF V1 CAUSING SLIGHT BRUISING. Occurred on HIGH STREET NO.9 N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to SW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Nearside Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 86 Male Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: SA634SU VRM: CV64YWD
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 87 Female Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659AW Seatbelt On footpath / verge SW bound
Movement U/K
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 14 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP13416 09/05/2016 Time 0820 Vehicles 3.00 Casualties 1.00 Serious E:195458 N: 237360 First Road: U Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Daylight:street lights present Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: At scene DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Distraction in vehicle Vehicle 001 Possible 2nd: Loss of control Vehicle 001 Very Likely 3rd: Failed to look properly Casualty 001 Very Likely 4th: Distraction outside vehicle Casualty 001 Very Likely 5th: Poor turn or manoevre Vehicle 001 Very Likely 6th:
OWNER OF V1 (GRANDFATHER) RETURNED HOME & REALISED THAT HE WANTED SOMETHING FROM V1. HE WALKED OUT TO V1 VAN ACCOMPANIED BY HIS TWO YR OLD GRANDDAUGHTER & PLACED HER ON FRONT SEAT. SHE USUALLY SITS IN DRIVERS SEAT & TURNS THE STEERING WHEEL. HOWEVER O Occurred on VICTORIA AVENUE NO.1 N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Goods 3.5 tonnes mgw and under Reversing Vehicle movement from SW to NE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Nearside Hit vehicle: 2 Hit object in road Parked Vehicle Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 67 Male Not hit and run Breath test Not requested Driver Postcode: SA659NY VRM: BK06GFG
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 67 Male Pedestrian Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode SA659DJ Seatbelt Location U/K SW bound
In carr not crossing Vehicle Reference 2 Car Parked Vehicle movement from Park to Parked No tow / articulation On main carriageway ed No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Nearside Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver Not traced Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: 3 VRM: A6FDE
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 15 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
Vehicle Reference 3 Car Parked Vehicle movement from Park to Parked No tow / articulation On main carriageway ed No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Back Hit vehicle: 1 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver Not traced Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: 3 VRM: KE15CNC
CP02815 21/02/2015 Time 1440 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Slight E:195670 N: 236929 First Road: A 40 Road Type Single carriageway Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Not within 20m of junction Crossing: Control None Facilities: None within 50m Road surface Dry Fine without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: Other object in carriageway Place accident reported: Elsewhere DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
MALE WALKING TOWARDS FISHGUARD SQUARE ON NARROW STRETCH OF ROAD. V1 TRAV IN SAME DIRECTION HAS COLLIDED WITH PEDESTRIAN'S ARM WHILST PASSING. V1 DESCRIBED AS WHITE CAR HAS NOT STOPPED & CARRIED ON GOING. Occurred on HIGH STREET N/A N/A FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from SW to NE No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Not at, or within 20M of Jct First impact Did not impact Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver Not traced Non-stop, not hit Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: 1 VRM:
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 40 Male Pedestrian Severity: Slight Not a pupil Postcode SA659LQ Seatbelt On footpath / verge SW bound
Movement U/K
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 16 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
CP22212 02/09/2012 Time 0755 Vehicles 1.00 Casualties 1.00 Serious E:195800 N: 237021 First Road: A 487 Road Type 1 Speed limit: 30 Junction Detail: Roundabout Give way or controlled A 40 Crossing: Control None Facilities: Pelican, puffin, toucan etc. Road surface Wet/Damp Raining without high winds Special Conditions at Site None Carriageway Hazards: None Place accident reported: Elsewhere DfT Special Projects:
Causation Factor: Participant: Confidence: 1st: Other Vehicle 001 Very Likely 2nd: 3rd: 4th: 5th: 6th:
CASUALTY ATTENDING CHURCH WITH SERVICE STARTING AT 8AM. WHILST WAITING TO CROSS/CROSSING, V1 STRUCK CASUALTY TO HER RIGHT SIDE. FEMALE DRIVER THEN CONVEYED CASUALTY TO HER HOME ADDRESS & THEN CONTACTED CASUALTY'S DAUGHTER. DRIVER THEN INFORMED THA Occurred on FISHGUARD SQUARE THE CHURCH N/A TO GOODWICK FISHGUARD (N/A)
Vehicle Reference 1 Car Going ahead other Vehicle movement from NE to SW No tow / articulation On main carriageway No skidding, jack-knifing or overturning Location at impact Entering roundabout First impact Front Hit vehicle: 0 Hit object in road None Off road: None Did not leave carr Age of Driver 42 Female Not hit and run Breath test Driver not contacted Driver Postcode: SA659DW VRM: LS52YCJ
Casualty Reference: 1 Vehicle: 1 Age: 86 Female Pedestrian Severity: Serious Not a pupil Postcode SA659AF Seatbelt Location U/K N bound
Driver's nearside
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 17 TRAFFMAP INTERPRETED LISTING Run on: 18/ 07/2017 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Accidents between dates 01/06/2012 and 31/05/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query : Atkinsglobal Request for PIC
Accidents involving: Casualties:
Fatal Serious Slight Total Fatal Serious Slight Total Motor vehicles Vehicle driver 0 1 2 3 only (excluding 0 4 11 15 2-wheels) Passenger 0 1 3 4 2-wheeled motor 0 1 0 1 vehicles Motorcycle rider 0 1 0 1
Cyclist 0 0 1 1 Pedal cycles 0 0 1 1 Pedestrian 0 3 6 9 Horses & other 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0
Total 0 6 12 18 Total 0 5 12 17
Registered to: Pembrokeshire County Council 18 Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Appendix B. Traffic Flow Diagrams
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 37
206
0 2018 Opening Year Traffic Flows - Do Nothing (AM) C A
353
0
0 0 B
A
72 135
125
95
C B
228
97
B 13 16
37
203
A C 9
159 208
0 2018 Opening Year Traffic Flows - Do Nothing (PM) C A
365
0
0 0 B
A
98 110
177
107
C B
188
137
B 38 46
40
237
A C 55
180 227
0 2028 Design Year Traffic Flows - Do Nothing (AM) C A
389
0
0 0 B
A
79 148
138
104
C B
251
107
B 15 18
41
224
A C 10
175 230
0 2028 Design Year Traffic Flows - Do Nothing (PM) C A
402
0
0 0 B
A
108 122
195
118
C B
207
151
B 42 51
44
261
A C 61
198 206 2018 Opening Year Traffic Flows - Do Something (AM) C A
353 108 B
A
85 229
C B
324
B
240
A C 237
172 208 2018 Opening Year Traffic Flows - Do Something (PM) C A
365 145 B
A
136 217
C B
326
B
277
A C 244
218 227 2028 Design Year Traffic Flows - Do Something (AM) C A
389 119 B
A
94 253
C B
358
B
265
A C 261
190 230 2028 Design Year Traffic Flows - Do Something (PM) C A
402 160 B
A
150 239
C B
359
B
306
A C 269
240 Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Appendix C. Junction Capacity Modelling Outputs
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 38
Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Junctions 9 ARCADY 9 - Roundabout Module Version: 9.0.1.4646 [] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2017 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
Filename: The Square_V2.j9 Path: P:\GBCFA\TP\HB\Projects\5123664 - Chimneys' Link, Fishguard - MORG9680\33_Analysis\Junction Modelling - 2016 \Junction Models\No Development - July 2017 Report generation date: 19/07/2017 09:40:32
»2018 Do-Nothing, AM »2018 Do-Nothing, PM »2018 Do-Something, AM »2018 Do-Something, PM »2028 Do-Nothing, AM »2028 Do-Nothing, PM »2028 Do-Something, AM »2028 Do-Something, PM
Summary of junction performance
AM PM Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS 2018 Do-Nothing
Arm A 0.4 7.61 0.30 A 0.4 7.26 0.30 A Arm B 1.3 14.16 0.56 B 1.2 13.37 0.55 B Arm C 0.5 8.46 0.34 A 0.7 8.84 0.41 A 2018 Do-Something
Arm A 0.8 8.87 0.44 A 0.9 9.10 0.47 A Arm B 1.3 14.35 0.56 B 1.3 14.08 0.56 B Arm C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 2028 Do-Nothing
Arm A 0.5 8.01 0.34 A 0.5 7.67 0.33 A Arm B 1.6 16.45 0.62 C 1.5 15.45 0.61 C Arm C 0.6 9.13 0.38 A 0.8 9.72 0.46 A 2028 Do-Something
Arm A 0.9 9.65 0.48 A 1.1 10.02 0.52 B Arm B 1.7 16.83 0.63 C 1.6 16.51 0.62 C Arm C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
1 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
File summary
File Description
Title (untitled) Location Site number Date 29/09/2016 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator WSATKINS\HOOP5251 Description
Units Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units m kph Veh Veh perHour s -Hour perHour
Analysis Options Calculate Queue Percentiles Calculate residual capacity RFC Threshold Average Delay threshold (s) Queue threshold (PCU) 0.85 36.00 20.00
Demand Set Summary Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D1 2018 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D2 2018 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D3 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D4 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D5 2028 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D6 2028 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D7 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D8 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Analysis Set Details ID Network flow scaling factor (%) A1 100.000
2 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Nothing, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 10.69 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Arms
Arms Arm Name Description A A487 West Street B A487 Main Street C A40 High Street
Roundabout Geometry V - Approach road half- E - Entry width l' - Effective flare R - Entry radius D - Inscribed circle PHI - Conflict (entry) Exit Arm width (m) (m) length (m) (m) diameter (m) angle (deg) only A 2.00 3.89 5.9 6.4 28.8 43.0 B 3.11 4.82 0.2 3.0 28.8 48.0 C 3.14 3.44 0.2 6.4 28.8 57.0
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr) A 0.419 756 B 0.335 633 C 0.408 776 The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D1 2018 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
3 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 207 100.000 B ü 325 100.000 C ü 220 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 135 72 From B 228 0 97 C 125 95 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 5 5 5 From B 5 5 5 C 5 5 5
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.30 7.61 0.4 A B 0.56 14.16 1.3 B C 0.34 8.46 0.5 A
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 207 94 680 0.304 205 0.4 7.549 A B 325 71 579 0.561 320 1.2 13.647 B C 220 225 647 0.340 218 0.5 8.351 A
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 207 95 680 0.304 207 0.4 7.608 A B 325 72 579 0.561 325 1.3 14.153 B C 220 228 646 0.341 220 0.5 8.456 A
4 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 207 95 680 0.304 207 0.4 7.608 A B 325 72 579 0.561 325 1.3 14.161 B C 220 228 646 0.341 220 0.5 8.456 A
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 207 95 680 0.304 207 0.4 7.608 A B 325 72 579 0.561 325 1.3 14.164 B C 220 228 646 0.341 220 0.5 8.457 A
5 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Nothing, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 10.24 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D2 2018 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 208 100.000 B ü 325 100.000 C ü 284 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 110 98 From B 188 0 137 C 177 107 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
6 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.30 7.26 0.4 A B 0.55 13.37 1.2 B C 0.41 8.84 0.7 A
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 208 106 704 0.295 206 0.4 7.211 A B 325 97 594 0.547 320 1.2 12.925 B C 284 185 692 0.410 281 0.7 8.701 A
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 208 107 704 0.296 208 0.4 7.263 A B 325 98 594 0.547 325 1.2 13.358 B C 284 188 691 0.411 284 0.7 8.837 A
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 208 107 704 0.296 208 0.4 7.263 A B 325 98 594 0.547 325 1.2 13.366 B C 284 188 691 0.411 284 0.7 8.839 A
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 208 107 704 0.296 208 0.4 7.263 A B 325 98 594 0.547 325 1.2 13.368 B C 284 188 691 0.411 284 0.7 8.839 A
7 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 11.65 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D3 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 314 100.000 B ü 324 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 229 85 From B 0 0 324 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 5 5 5 From B 5 5 5 C 5 5 5
8 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.44 8.87 0.8 A B 0.56 14.35 1.3 B C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 314 0 720 0.436 311 0.8 8.740 A B 324 84 575 0.564 319 1.2 13.814 B C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 314 0 720 0.436 314 0.8 8.867 A B 324 85 575 0.564 324 1.3 14.340 B C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 314 0 720 0.436 314 0.8 8.869 A B 324 85 575 0.564 324 1.3 14.351 B C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 314 0 720 0.436 314 0.8 8.869 A B 324 85 575 0.564 324 1.3 14.354 B C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
9 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 11.49 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D4 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 353 100.000 B ü 326 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 217 136 From B 0 0 326 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
10 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.47 9.10 0.9 A B 0.56 14.08 1.3 B C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 353 0 748 0.472 349 0.9 8.949 A B 326 135 582 0.560 321 1.2 13.562 B C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 353 0 748 0.472 353 0.9 9.102 A B 326 136 581 0.561 326 1.3 14.072 B C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 353 0 748 0.472 353 0.9 9.104 A B 326 136 581 0.561 326 1.3 14.081 B C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 353 0 748 0.472 353 0.9 9.104 A B 326 136 581 0.561 326 1.3 14.084 B C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
11 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Nothing, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 11.99 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D5 2028 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 227 100.000 B ü 358 100.000 C ü 242 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 148 79 From B 251 0 107 C 138 104 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 5 5 5 From B 5 5 5 C 5 5 5
12 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.34 8.01 0.5 A B 0.62 16.45 1.6 C C 0.38 9.13 0.6 A
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 227 103 677 0.335 225 0.5 7.935 A B 358 78 577 0.621 352 1.6 15.590 C C 242 247 638 0.379 240 0.6 8.982 A
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 227 104 676 0.336 227 0.5 8.011 A B 358 79 577 0.621 358 1.6 16.420 C C 242 251 636 0.380 242 0.6 9.127 A
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 227 104 676 0.336 227 0.5 8.011 A B 358 79 577 0.621 358 1.6 16.440 C C 242 251 636 0.380 242 0.6 9.130 A
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 227 104 676 0.336 227 0.5 8.011 A B 358 79 577 0.621 358 1.6 16.448 C C 242 251 636 0.380 242 0.6 9.130 A
13 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Nothing, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 11.47 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D6 2028 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 230 100.000 B ü 358 100.000 C ü 313 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 122 108 From B 207 0 151 C 195 118 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
14 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.33 7.67 0.5 A B 0.61 15.45 1.5 C C 0.46 9.72 0.8 A
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 230 117 699 0.329 228 0.5 7.607 A B 358 107 591 0.606 352 1.5 14.724 B C 313 204 685 0.457 310 0.8 9.515 A
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 230 118 699 0.329 230 0.5 7.675 A B 358 108 591 0.606 358 1.5 15.428 C C 313 207 684 0.458 313 0.8 9.710 A
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 230 118 699 0.329 230 0.5 7.675 A B 358 108 591 0.606 358 1.5 15.444 C C 313 207 684 0.458 313 0.8 9.715 A
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 230 118 699 0.329 230 0.5 7.675 A B 358 108 591 0.606 358 1.5 15.448 C C 313 207 684 0.458 313 0.8 9.716 A
15 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 13.30 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D7 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 347 100.000 B ü 358 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 253 94 From B 0 0 358 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 5 5 5 From B 5 5 5 C 5 5 5
16 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.48 9.65 0.9 A B 0.63 16.83 1.7 C C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 347 0 720 0.482 343 0.9 9.472 A B 358 93 572 0.626 352 1.6 15.913 C C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 347 0 720 0.482 347 0.9 9.653 A B 358 94 572 0.626 358 1.6 16.803 C C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 347 0 720 0.482 347 0.9 9.652 A B 358 94 572 0.626 358 1.6 16.824 C C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 347 0 720 0.482 347 0.9 9.653 A B 358 94 572 0.626 358 1.7 16.833 C C 0 0 739 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 The Square Standard Roundabout 13.13 B
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D8 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 389 100.000 B ü 359 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 239 150 From B 0 0 359 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
18 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:41:08 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS A 0.52 10.02 1.1 B B 0.62 16.51 1.6 C C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 389 0 748 0.520 385 1.1 9.791 A B 359 148 577 0.622 353 1.6 15.625 C C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 389 0 748 0.520 389 1.1 10.012 B B 359 150 577 0.622 359 1.6 16.486 C C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 389 0 748 0.520 389 1.1 10.014 B B 359 150 577 0.622 359 1.6 16.507 C C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Circulating flow Throughput Arm Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) A 389 0 748 0.520 389 1.1 10.016 B B 359 150 577 0.622 359 1.6 16.513 C C 0 0 768 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A
19 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Junctions 9 PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module Version: 9.0.1.4646 [] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2017 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
Filename: Co-Op Existing Access Junction_V2.j9 Path: P:\GBCFA\TP\HB\Projects\5123664 - Chimneys' Link, Fishguard - MORG9680\33_Analysis\Junction Modelling - 2016 \Junction Models\No Development - July 2017 Report generation date: 19/07/2017 09:46:50
»2018 Do-Nothing, AM »2018 Do-Nothing, PM »2028 Do-Nothing, AM »2028 Do-Nothing, PM
Summary of junction performance
AM PM Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS 2018 Do-Nothing
Stream B-C 0.0 6.30 0.03 A 0.1 6.58 0.08 A Stream B-A 0.0 8.99 0.03 A 0.1 9.80 0.09 A Stream C-AB 0.0 6.77 0.02 A 0.1 7.01 0.10 A 2028 Do-Nothing
Stream B-C 0.0 6.41 0.03 A 0.1 6.75 0.09 A Stream B-A 0.0 9.21 0.04 A 0.1 10.22 0.11 B Stream C-AB 0.0 6.85 0.02 A 0.1 7.14 0.11 A
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
File summary
File Description
Title (untitled) Location Site number Date 30/09/2016 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator WSATKINS\HOOP5251 Description
Units Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units m kph Veh Veh perHour s -Hour perHour
1 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Analysis Options Calculate Queue Percentiles Calculate residual capacity RFC Threshold Average Delay threshold (s) Queue threshold (PCU) 0.85 36.00 20.00
Demand Set Summary ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D1 2018 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D2 2018 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D3 2028 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D4 2028 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Analysis Set Details ID Network flow scaling factor (%) A1 100.000
2 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Nothing, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Existing Co-Op Entrance T-Junction Two-way 0.64 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Arms
Arms Arm Name Description Arm type A High St (W) Major B Co-Operative Minor C High St (E) Major
Major Arm Geometry Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU) C 6.00 100.0 ü 1.00 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry Minor arm Width at give- Width at Width at Width at Width at Estimate flare Flare length Visibility to Visibility to Arm type way (m) 5m (m) 10m (m) 15m (m) 20m (m) length (PCU) left (m) right (m) One lane plus B 10.00 4.90 3.70 3.70 3.70 1.00 20 18 flare ü
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (Veh/hr) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 522 0.095 0.240 0.151 0.344 1 B-C 689 0.106 0.267 - - 1 C-B 632 0.245 0.245 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D1 2018 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
3 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 240 100.000 B ü 29 100.000 C ü 168 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 37 203 From B 13 0 16 C 159 9 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 6 6 6 From B 6 6 6 C 6 6 6
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.03 6.30 0.0 A B-A 0.03 8.99 0.0 A C-AB 0.02 6.77 0.0 A C-A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 16 587 0.027 16 0.0 6.298 A B-A 13 413 0.031 13 0.0 8.987 A C-AB 9 541 0.017 9 0.0 6.770 A C-A 159 159 A-B 37 37 A-C 203 203
4 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 16 587 0.027 16 0.0 6.300 A B-A 13 413 0.031 13 0.0 8.991 A C-AB 9 541 0.017 9 0.0 6.770 A C-A 159 159 A-B 37 37 A-C 203 203
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 16 587 0.027 16 0.0 6.300 A B-A 13 413 0.031 13 0.0 8.991 A C-AB 9 541 0.017 9 0.0 6.770 A C-A 159 159 A-B 37 37 A-C 203 203
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 16 587 0.027 16 0.0 6.300 A B-A 13 413 0.031 13 0.0 8.991 A C-AB 9 541 0.017 9 0.0 6.773 A C-A 159 159 A-B 37 37 A-C 203 203
5 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Nothing, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Existing Co-Op Entrance T-Junction Two-way 1.80 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D2 2018 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 277 100.000 B ü 84 100.000 C ü 235 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 40 237 From B 38 0 46 C 180 55 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 2 2 2 From B 2 2 2 C 2 2 2
6 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.08 6.58 0.1 A B-A 0.09 9.80 0.1 A C-AB 0.10 7.01 0.1 A C-A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 46 593 0.078 46 0.1 6.573 A B-A 38 405 0.094 38 0.1 9.778 A C-AB 57 570 0.100 56 0.1 6.997 A C-A 178 178 A-B 40 40 A-C 237 237
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 46 593 0.078 46 0.1 6.584 A B-A 38 405 0.094 38 0.1 9.802 A C-AB 57 570 0.100 57 0.1 7.011 A C-A 178 178 A-B 40 40 A-C 237 237
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 46 593 0.078 46 0.1 6.584 A B-A 38 405 0.094 38 0.1 9.802 A C-AB 57 570 0.100 57 0.1 7.009 A C-A 178 178 A-B 40 40 A-C 237 237
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 46 593 0.078 46 0.1 6.584 A B-A 38 405 0.094 38 0.1 9.802 A C-AB 57 570 0.100 57 0.1 7.011 A C-A 178 178 A-B 40 40 A-C 237 237
7 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Nothing, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Existing Co-Op Entrance T-Junction Two-way 0.67 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D3 2028 Do-Nothing AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 265 100.000 B ü 33 100.000 C ü 185 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 41 224 From B 15 0 18 C 175 10 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 6 6 6 From B 6 6 6 C 6 6 6
8 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.03 6.41 0.0 A B-A 0.04 9.21 0.0 A C-AB 0.02 6.85 0.0 A C-A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 18 580 0.031 18 0.0 6.404 A B-A 15 406 0.037 15 0.0 9.211 A C-AB 10 535 0.019 10 0.0 6.852 A C-A 175 175 A-B 41 41 A-C 224 224
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 18 580 0.031 18 0.0 6.408 A B-A 15 406 0.037 15 0.0 9.213 A C-AB 10 535 0.019 10 0.0 6.852 A C-A 175 175 A-B 41 41 A-C 224 224
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 18 580 0.031 18 0.0 6.408 A B-A 15 406 0.037 15 0.0 9.213 A C-AB 10 535 0.019 10 0.0 6.855 A C-A 175 175 A-B 41 41 A-C 224 224
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 18 580 0.031 18 0.0 6.408 A B-A 15 406 0.037 15 0.0 9.213 A C-AB 10 535 0.019 10 0.0 6.855 A C-A 175 175 A-B 41 41 A-C 224 224
9 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Nothing, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Existing Co-Op Entrance T-Junction Two-way 1.87 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time period length (min) Time segment length (min) D4 2028 Do-Nothing PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 305 100.000 B ü 93 100.000 C ü 259 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 44 261 From B 42 0 51 C 198 61 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 2 2 2 From B 2 2 2 C 2 2 2
10 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:47:12 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.09 6.75 0.1 A B-A 0.11 10.22 0.1 B C-AB 0.11 7.14 0.1 A C-A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 51 584 0.087 51 0.1 6.742 A B-A 42 394 0.107 42 0.1 10.194 B C-AB 64 568 0.112 63 0.1 7.122 A C-A 195 195 A-B 44 44 A-C 261 261
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 51 584 0.087 51 0.1 6.754 A B-A 42 394 0.107 42 0.1 10.223 B C-AB 64 568 0.112 64 0.1 7.140 A C-A 195 195 A-B 44 44 A-C 261 261
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 51 584 0.087 51 0.1 6.754 A B-A 42 394 0.107 42 0.1 10.223 B C-AB 64 568 0.112 64 0.1 7.140 A C-A 195 195 A-B 44 44 A-C 261 261
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 51 584 0.087 51 0.1 6.754 A B-A 42 394 0.107 42 0.1 10.223 B C-AB 64 568 0.112 64 0.1 7.140 A C-A 195 195 A-B 44 44 A-C 261 261
11 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Junctions 9 PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module Version: 9.0.1.4646 [] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2017 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
Filename: Chimneys Link Access Junction_V2.j9 Path: P:\GBCFA\TP\HB\Projects\5123664 - Chimneys' Link, Fishguard - MORG9680\33_Analysis\Junction Modelling - 2016 \Junction Models\No Development - July 2017 Report generation date: 19/07/2017 09:55:10
»2018 Do-Something, AM »2018 Do-Something, PM »2028 Do-Something, AM »2028 Do-Something, PM
Summary of junction performance
AM PM Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS 2018 Do-Something
Stream B-C 0.4 7.47 0.26 A 0.5 7.64 0.32 A Stream B-A 0.6 9.27 0.38 A 0.6 9.40 0.39 A Stream C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 2028 Do-Something
Stream B-C 0.4 8.06 0.30 A 0.6 8.37 0.36 A Stream B-A 0.7 10.19 0.42 B 0.8 10.37 0.44 B Stream C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
File summary
File Description
Title (untitled) Location Site number Date 30/09/2016 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator WSATKINS\HOOP5251 Description
Units Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units m kph Veh Veh perHour s -Hour perHour
1 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Analysis Options Calculate Queue Percentiles Calculate residual capacity RFC Threshold Average Delay threshold (s) Queue threshold (PCU) 0.85 36.00 20.00
Demand Set Summary Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D1 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D2 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D3 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D4 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Analysis Set Details ID Network flow scaling factor (%) A1 100.000
2 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 5.36 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Arms
Arms Arm Name Description Arm type A Chimney's Link Major B High St (E) Minor C High Street (W) Major
Major Arm Geometry Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU) C 6.00 0.0 - Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry Minor arm Width at give- Width at Width at Width at Width at Estimate flare Flare length Visibility to Visibility to Arm type way (m) 5m (m) 10m (m) 15m (m) 20m (m) length (PCU) left (m) right (m) One lane plus B 10.00 10.00 7.40 5.50 5.20 1.50 200 200 flare
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (Veh/hr) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 721 0.131 0.332 0.209 0.474 1 B-C 789 0.121 0.306 - - 1 C-B 574 0.222 0.222 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D1 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
3 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 0 100.000 B ü 409 100.000 C ü 240 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 0 0 From B 237 0 172 C 240 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 6 6 6 From B 6 6 6 C 6 6 6
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.26 7.47 0.4 A B-A 0.38 9.27 0.6 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 172 655 0.263 171 0.4 7.408 A B-A 237 625 0.379 235 0.6 9.158 A C-A 240 240 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
4 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 172 654 0.263 172 0.4 7.471 A B-A 237 625 0.379 237 0.6 9.270 A C-A 240 240 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 172 654 0.263 172 0.4 7.471 A B-A 237 625 0.379 237 0.6 9.272 A C-A 240 240 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 172 654 0.263 172 0.4 7.471 A B-A 237 625 0.379 237 0.6 9.272 A C-A 240 240 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
5 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 5.36 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D2 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 0 100.000 B ü 462 100.000 C ü 277 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 0 0 From B 244 0 218 C 277 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 2 2 2 From B 2 2 2 C 2 2 2
6 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.32 7.64 0.5 A B-A 0.39 9.40 0.6 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 218 690 0.316 216 0.5 7.562 A B-A 244 627 0.389 241 0.6 9.273 A C-A 277 277 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 218 689 0.316 218 0.5 7.645 A B-A 244 627 0.389 244 0.6 9.396 A C-A 277 277 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 218 689 0.316 218 0.5 7.645 A B-A 244 627 0.389 244 0.6 9.398 A C-A 277 277 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 218 689 0.316 218 0.5 7.645 A B-A 244 627 0.389 244 0.6 9.398 A C-A 277 277 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
7 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 5.85 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D3 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 0 100.000 B ü 451 100.000 C ü 265 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 0 0 From B 261 0 190 C 265 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 6 6 6 From B 6 6 6 C 6 6 6
8 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.30 8.06 0.4 A B-A 0.42 10.19 0.7 B C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 190 639 0.297 188 0.4 7.965 A B-A 261 615 0.425 258 0.7 10.019 B C-A 265 265 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 190 637 0.298 190 0.4 8.059 A B-A 261 614 0.425 261 0.7 10.186 B C-A 265 265 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 190 637 0.298 190 0.4 8.059 A B-A 261 614 0.425 261 0.7 10.188 B C-A 265 265 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 190 637 0.298 190 0.4 8.059 A B-A 261 614 0.425 261 0.7 10.188 B C-A 265 265 C-B 0 541 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
9 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 5.89 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D4 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 0 100.000 B ü 509 100.000 C ü 306 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 0 0 From B 269 0 240 C 306 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 2 2 2 From B 2 2 2 C 2 2 2
10 Generated on 19/07/2017 09:55:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-C 0.36 8.37 0.6 A B-A 0.44 10.37 0.8 B C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 240 673 0.357 238 0.5 8.241 A B-A 269 616 0.436 266 0.8 10.185 B C-A 306 306 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 240 670 0.358 240 0.6 8.365 A B-A 269 616 0.437 269 0.8 10.372 B C-A 306 306 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 240 670 0.358 240 0.6 8.365 A B-A 269 616 0.437 269 0.8 10.374 B C-A 306 306 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-C 240 670 0.358 240 0.6 8.365 A B-A 269 616 0.437 269 0.8 10.374 B C-A 306 306 C-B 0 563 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 0 0 A-C 0 0
11 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Junctions 9 PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module Version: 9.0.1.4646 [] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2017 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
Filename: Chimneys Link Exit Junction_V2.j9 Path: P:\GBCFA\TP\HB\Projects\5123664 - Chimneys' Link, Fishguard - MORG9680\33_Analysis\Junction Modelling - 2016 \Junction Models\No Development - July 2017 Report generation date: 19/07/2017 10:05:23
»2018 Do-Something, AM »2018 Do-Something, PM »2028 Do-Something, AM »2028 Do-Something, PM
Summary of junction performance
AM PM Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (Veh) Delay (s) RFC LOS 2018 Do-Something
Stream B-AC 0.5 8.73 0.33 A 0.5 8.59 0.33 A Stream C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 2028 Do-Something
Stream B-AC 0.6 9.37 0.37 A 0.6 9.26 0.37 A Stream C-B 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
File summary
File Description
Title (untitled) Location Site number Date 30/09/2016 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator WSATKINS\HOOP5251 Description
Units Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units m kph Veh Veh perHour s -Hour perHour
1 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Analysis Options Calculate Queue Percentiles Calculate residual capacity RFC Threshold Average Delay threshold (s) Queue threshold (PCU) 0.85 36.00 20.00
Demand Set Summary Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D1 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D2 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15 D3 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15 D4 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Analysis Set Details ID Network flow scaling factor (%) A1 100.000
2 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 2.70 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Arms
Arms Arm Name Description Arm type A Chimney's Link Major B West St (N) Minor C West Street (S) Major
Major Arm Geometry Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU) C 6.00 0.0 - Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry Arm Minor arm type Lane width (m) Visibility to left (m) Visibility to right (m) B One lane 4.00 45 40
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (Veh/hr) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 563 0.103 0.259 0.163 0.370 1 B-C 714 0.109 0.277 - - 1 C-B 574 0.222 0.222 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D1 2018 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
3 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 461 100.000 B ü 206 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 353 108 From B 0 0 206 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 4 4 4 From B 4 4 4 C 4 4 4
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-AC 0.33 8.73 0.5 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 206 618 0.333 204 0.5 8.654 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 449 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 353 353 A-C 108 108
08:15 - 08:30
4 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 206 618 0.333 206 0.5 8.734 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 449 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 353 353 A-C 108 108
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 206 618 0.333 206 0.5 8.734 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 449 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 353 353 A-C 108 108
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 206 618 0.333 206 0.5 8.734 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 449 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 353 353 A-C 108 108
5 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2018 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 2.49 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D2 2018 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 510 100.000 B ü 208 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 365 145 From B 0 0 208 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
6 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-AC 0.33 8.59 0.5 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 208 627 0.332 206 0.5 8.515 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 455 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 365 365 A-C 145 145
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 208 627 0.332 208 0.5 8.592 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 455 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 365 365 A-C 145 145
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 208 627 0.332 208 0.5 8.592 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 455 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 365 365 A-C 145 145
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 208 627 0.332 208 0.5 8.592 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 455 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 365 365 A-C 145 145
7 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, AM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 2.89 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D3 2028 Do-Something AM FLAT 08:00 09:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 508 100.000 B ü 227 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 389 119 From B 0 0 227 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 4 4 4 From B 4 4 4 C 4 4 4
8 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-AC 0.37 9.37 0.6 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
08:00 - 08:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 227 611 0.371 225 0.6 9.261 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 439 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 389 389 A-C 119 119
08:15 - 08:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 227 611 0.371 227 0.6 9.371 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 439 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 389 389 A-C 119 119
08:30 - 08:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 227 611 0.371 227 0.6 9.371 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 439 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 389 389 A-C 119 119
08:45 - 09:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 227 611 0.371 227 0.6 9.371 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 439 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 389 389 A-C 119 119
9 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2028 Do-Something, PM
Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings
Junction Network
Junctions Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 Chimney's Link Access T-Junction Two-way 2.69 A
Junction Network Options Driving side Lighting Left Normal/unknown
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details Time Period Traffic profile Start time Finish time Time period length Time segment length ID Scenario name name type (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) (min) D4 2028 Do-Something PM FLAT 17:00 18:00 60 15
Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU) HV Percentages 2.00
Demand overview (Traffic) Arm Linked arm Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr) Scaling Factor (%) A ü 562 100.000 B ü 230 100.000 C ü 0 100.000
Origin-Destination Data Demand (Veh/hr) To A B C A 0 402 160 From B 0 0 230 C 0 0 0
Vehicle Mix Heavy Vehicle Percentages To A B C A 1 1 1 From B 1 1 1 C 1 1 1
10 Generated on 19/07/2017 10:05:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (Veh) Max LOS B-AC 0.37 9.26 0.6 A C-A C-B 0.00 0.00 0.0 A A-B A-C
Main Results for each time segment
17:00 - 17:15 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 230 619 0.372 228 0.6 9.152 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 443 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 402 402 A-C 160 160
17:15 - 17:30 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 230 619 0.372 230 0.6 9.259 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 443 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 402 402 A-C 160 160
17:30 - 17:45 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 230 619 0.372 230 0.6 9.259 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 443 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 402 402 A-C 160 160
17:45 - 18:00 Total Demand Throughput Stream Capacity (Veh/hr) RFC End queue (Veh) Delay (s) LOS (Veh/hr) (Veh/hr) B-AC 230 619 0.372 230 0.6 9.259 A C-A 0 0 C-B 0 443 0.000 0 0.0 0.000 A A-B 402 402 A-C 160 160
11 Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment
Appendix D. Existing Carriageway Widths
Atkins Chimney's Link Town Centre Enhancement Scheme Transport Assessment | Version 8.0 | September 2017 | 5123664 39
1.83
2.22 1.53
1.59
1.58
1.63 1.47
1.67 1.53 3.09 WEST STREET 1.6
1.79 1.97
1.7
5.02 1.88
5.29 1.94
1.35
1.39
6.15 1.34 1.69
1.7
5.87
3.31 1.26
1.07 0.78 3.04
2.85
2.81
2.97 2.43
0.82 0.75
1.22
1.37
1.04
1.54 7.24
6.61 6.72
5.45 HIGH STREET 0.74 0.51
0.47 5.35
0.33 1.23 0.66
5.14
0.5 0.71
4.67
4.68 0.44 0.57
5.93 4.86 5.88
4.85
5.29 0.57
4.7
0.44
0.95
0.99 1.01
0.68
1.2
0.87
0.96 1.2
66.50
67.76 68.01 67.30 DP
68.21 66.56 69.15 67.30
67.80 DP G 67.90
67.73 66.62
69.16 66.90 68.11 66.66
69.00
68.40 2.14 69.06 66.56 SC 67.56 SC 67.89 66.23
66.65
2.52 2.33 66.40 SC 2.29 F1 1.9 67.15 F10 67.05
5.32
5.53 5.92
6.01
5.93 1.95
HIGH STREET 5.88 1.28
1.61
0.84
FISHGUARD TRUNK ROAD EXISTING CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH A1 Scale 1:150
Atkins Longcross Court 47 Newport Road Cardiff CF24 0AD
[email protected] 02920 48 5159
© Atkins Ltd except where stated otherwise.
The Atkins logo, ‘Carbon Critical Design’ and the strapline ‘Plan Design Enable’ are trademarks of Atkins Ltd.