School District of the City of Saginaw Follow-Up Study of 2000 Graduates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 465 949 CG 031 855 AUTHOR Claus, Richard N. TITLE School District of the City of Saginaw Follow-Up Study of 2000 Graduates. Revised. INSTITUTION Saginaw Public Schools, MI. PUB DATE 2002-06-00 NOTE 32p.; Some charts may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Numerical/Quantitative Data (110) Reports Research (143)-- Tests/Questionnaires (160) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adolescents; College Preparation; Followup Studies; *High School Graduates; High Schools; Higher Education; *Outcomes of Education; Questionnaires; *School Effectiveness; *Telephone Surveys; Vocational Interests; Young Adults IDENTIFIERS *Saginaw City School System MI ABSTRACT In June 2000, 492 students received diplomas from two high schools in Saginaw, Michigan. To determine these graduates' activities nine months after graduation, 376 of them were telephoned and asked about post-secondary education, employment status, and perception/evaluation of their high school education. The results of that survey are reported here. Survey findings will provide school board members, administrators, teachers, and counselors with data to assist them in instructional and curricular planning. Results indicate that 70.9% of the graduates were in college, school, training, or apprentice programs. For those attending school, the five top study areas were business, education and social services, medicine and health services, general courses/undecided, and engineering and architecture. Over half (52.9%) of the graduates attending school felt that they used their high school education a lot in their major area of study. Regarding employment, 70.3% of those surveyed were working for pay and 4.8% were full-time homemakers. The two most frequently mentioned "suggested improvements" to the high school program were: "more challenging courses such as problem-solving exercises, more basic college level classes" and "better teachers that check student work." Four appendixes present survey instruments and data. (GCP) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF 2000 GRADUATES Report Prepared By: Richard N. Claus, Ph.D. Manager, Program Evaluation Evaluation and Quality Measurement Department U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) ID This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction Quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OE RI position or policy. PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 School District of the City of Saginaw Revised, June 2002 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Acknowledgments The writers of this report would like to acknowledge the contributions of a number of very important people. Without their help, this report could not have been completed. First, Mr. Craig McCain and Ms. Jean Farrington for their help in designing a follow-up instrument for the Saginaw Career Complex (SCC) and a parallel instrument for the entire district. SCC and Evaluation staffs who made phone calls related to both studies are due a special "Thank You". Mrs. Deb Juhasz- Krawczyk, Mrs. Rosemary Schindler, and others at the Central Office acted as phone interviewers for the phone calling portion of the survey. Thanks also to the Evaluation staff, especially Alice Hall and Phyllis Dietrich for phoning, typing, copying, and collating the survey and its results. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements Table of Contents ii List of Tables iii Introduction 1 Who Were Surveyed, How, and When'? 2 What are Our Graduates Doing? 3 How Many of Our Graduates are Working for Pay'? 4 How Much Pay Do Those Working Receive on 5 a Weekly Basis? Who Were the Main Employers of Our Graduates? 7 How Many of Our Graduates are Looking for a Job? 7 How Many of Our Graduates are Pursuing Further Education? How Well are the Schools Preparing the Graduates in Computer 9 Literacy and Life Management Skills? In Their Current Major Area of Study, How Much Do Our 11 Graduates Use Their High School Education? What Do Our Graduates Feel the Schools Do Well and 11 What Do They Want Improved? APPENDICES Appendix A: A Follow-up Study of 2000 Graduates (Phone Survey) 13 Appendix B: A Follow-up Study of 2000 Graduates (N = 376) 16 Appendix C: Educational Career Emphasis Categories Used in 26 Saginaw's 2000 Follow-up Study Appendix D: 2000 Graduate Placement Rate 27 4 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Comparison of the 2000 Graduate Population 2 With the 2000 Graduates Completing a Follow-up Questionnaire D-1 2000 Graduate Placement Rate 27 iii5 INT OIDUCTION The School District of the. City of Saginaw has had a history of doing a follow-up study of its graduates. The Evaluation and Quality Measurement Department of the School District of the City of Saginaw, has been assigned the main responsibility of conducting the study and producing a report. The requirement to follow the graduates past the walls of the public school setting has been going on for the past ten years. The five prior years and the current year are no exceptions in trying totrack the careers of the graduates. This six-year period, as illustrated in the graph below, has shown the ability to contact a larger percent age, of graduates (or their parents/relatives), to learn more about the graduates who are now gone from the public schools here in Saginaw, but are not forgotten. GRADUATES COMPLETING GRADUATE FOLLO-UP SURVEY 1999-2000 764 1998-1999 80 7 1997-1998 7: 3 1996-1997 732 1995-1996 64 1994-1995 H1 54,2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 PERCENT RESPONDING As can be seen in the graph above, a somewhat increasing percentage of graduates have been contacted from approximately 54% in 1994-95 (54.2%) and 1995-96 (54.0%), to approximately +70% in 1996-97 (73.2%), 1997-98 (77.3%), 1998-99 (80.7%), and 1999-00 (76.4%). BEST COPY AVAILABLE 6 WHO WERE SURVEYED, HOW, AND WHEN? Who: All 492 students who completed their education by receiving a high school diplomafrom either Arthur Hill or Saginaw High School during the 1999-2000 school year were surveyed. Atotal of 376 responded either personally or by proxy. Table I below contains a breakdown by ethnic background and gender of those completingthe follow-up questionnaire and the 2000 graduating class. Table 1 Comparison of the 2000 Graduate Population With the 2000 Graduates Completing a Follow-up Questionnaire 2000 Graduates Completing Questionnaire Percent of Grad. Percent of Responding TOTAL/CATEGORY VARIABLES Population of 2000 Graduating Class Percent of Grad. by Category Ethnic Background, NumberN Respondents Class Variable Gender, and School Number Percent TOTAL 492 100.0 376 100.0 76.4 ETHNIC BACKGROUND White 178 36.2 145 38.6 81.5 Black 269 54.7 191 50.8 71.0 Hispanic 40 8.1 35 9.4 87.5 American Indian 1 0.2 1 0.3 100.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 4 0.8 4 1.0 100.0 GENDER Female 264 53.7 203 54.0 76.9 Male 228 46.3 173 46.0 75.9 SCHOOL Arthur Hill 295 60.0 231 61.4 78.3 Saginaw High 197 40.0 145 38,6 73.6 Of the responding graduates, 231 (61.4%) were from Arthur Hill and 145 (38.6%) were fromSaginaw High. The graduating class was made up of 295 (60.0%) from Arthur Hill and 197 (40.0%) from Saginaw High. Thus, Arthur Hill and Saginaw High students were approximately equal to their representation in the graduating class. Generally, the respondents were representative of thegraduating class population in terms of ethnic background, gender, and school. How and When: To determine what they have been doing approximately nine months after graduating, the Evaluationand Quality Measurement Department, in conjunction with the staff from the Saginaw Career Complex (SCC), created a phone survey (see Appendix A for a copy of the instrument.). Graduates were called by telephone March through May, 2001, either by a SCC staff member (if they completed a SCC Program), or by the EQM Staff. The questionnaire directed respondents toidentify issues related to their post- secondary education, employment status, and perception/evaluation of their high school education. The findings, by item, are contained in Appendix B, and represent all the responses received as of May 23, 2001. 2.7 The results of the 2000 graduate follow-up study are presented on the pages that follow.The nine areas of inquiry that are posed and answered include the following: o What are our graduates doing? o How many of our graduates are working for pay? o How much pay do those working receive on a weekly basis? o Who were the main employers of our graduates? o How many of our graduates are looking for a job? o How many of our graduates are pursuing further education? o How well are the schools preparing the graduates in computer literacy and life management skills? o In their current major area of study, how much do our graduates use their high school education? o What do our graduates feel the schools do well and what do they want improved? In addition, trend data are provided where available for up to five priorgraduating classes. Thus, the information related to the 2000 graduates can be put into some perspective by reviewinginformation from prior graduating classes. WIERAT ARE OUR GRADUATES DOING? Our graduates are working for pay, seeking further education/training, or serving their countryin the military. Some 376 (or 93.6%) are placed in these activities (see Appendix D for thiscombined count).