STRUCTURALCOMPONENTS 4 Conceptual Building Models with Structural Design Justification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STRUCTURALCOMPONENTS 4 Conceptual Building Models with Structural Design Justification Master’s thesis STRUCTURALCOMPONENTS 4 Conceptual building models with structural design justification Arie Bovenberg Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Department of Structural Engineering Section Structural and Building Engineering This page has been intentionally left blank. Preface This report is the result of the Master’s thesis project of Arie Bovenberg, the fourth in a series of graduation projects on the subject of StructuralComponents: an early stage design tool for structural design (Rolvink et al., 2009). The subject of this thesis is the development of a conceptual building model to support composition of structural design justification. This research is part of a collaboration of the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geo- sciences of the Delft University of Technology, the BEMNext Laboratory, and White Lioness technologies. The graduation committee consisted of the following mem- bers: Prof. dr. ir. J.G. Rots [email protected] Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics Dr. ir. J.L. Coenders [email protected] Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural and Building Engineering White Lioness technologies Ir. A. Rolvink [email protected] Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics White Lioness technologies Ir. J.W. Welleman [email protected] Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics Ir. S. Hofman [email protected] Arup Amsterdam iii This page has been intentionally left blank. Summary The adoption of computation in the building industry has led to the development of a range of tools intended for design, but these are often focused on detailed analysis and documentation, instead of flexibility and insight. This results in missed opportunities for computational analysis in the early design stages where decisions are most influential. Also, a large part of the process and reasoning behind these decisions is lost due to a lack of suitable early-stage models. StructuralComponents is a design tool for conceptual structural design which aims to address the needs of the early design stages. The current implementation is focused on quick, insightful analysis of high-rise structures. The main aim of Struc- turalComponents 4 is not only to cover more general structural typologies, but also to model a more complete representation of structural design concepts: not as a single model or analysis method but as a design story or justification, consisting of the various models, simplifications, reasoning, alternatives, and scenarios used to develop and justify the design. The StructuralComponents 4 prototype implementation consists of the conceptual building model, a user interface and a simple computational (parametric) engine. High-level requirements for the tool have been developed based on existing research and insights into (structural) design and conceptual modeling. The iterative devel- opment process of the tool itself has also provided feedback to refine these assump- tions. High-level characteristics of (structural) design indicate the tool must support: • a unique process structure straction and scale • multidimensional problems and in- • various analysis models tegrated solutions • cases and scenarios • parallel alternatives • progression from preliminary to • modeling at different levels of ab- detailed design The resulting central concepts of the conceptual building model are: “Blank slate” components The main building-blocks of the model are components which aim to follow the designers needs, instead of providing a detailed standard. Components can be defined by the user to represent any structural feature, and can contain quantitative as well as qualitative information. Hierarchical component breakdown Components are organized hierarchically to indicate the breakdown of the v structure. This makes it possible to model the structure at several levels of abstraction. Reflective design reasoning Justification behind an design information can be expressed as the result of a design-step, which in turn is based on the context of existing information. This allows a chain of decisions giving insight into the reasoning behind values as well as the effect of changes. Analysis models as automated reasoning Analysis models are implemented as automated logic to be applied in the design-steps, allowing these to be re-run when parameters change. Alternative values The building model supports multiple values per component attribute, allow- ing the user to represent alternative values in parallel. Component variants Complex alternatives are supported through component variants, which com- bine a set of choices for alternative values. These concepts been implemented in the prototype, and have been validated through application in practical cases (see Figure1 for a condensed example). Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing the analysis of the stability of a “core” component in a building model, making use of various analysis models and scenarios. Based on the structural design of the RAI Elicium building (Arup Amsterdam, 2009). The validation shows that the central concepts of the building model sufficiently address the high-level requirements. Notable limitations are the absence of geomet- ric and visual representations, constraints on variation between alternative compo- nents, and lack of overview at detail level. Based on the observations during validation, further directions for investigation are suggested. These include opportunities for standardization; reflection and visual representations; bi-directional associations; geometric associations; replication; dis- tinguishing alternatives and scenarios; and an improved user interface. By making a larger part of the design story explicit, the StructuralComponents 4 building model represents a significant step towards broader application of compu- tation in design, specifically improved communication of reasoning behind design, and more effective use of optimization and analysis trough scenarios and parallel alternatives. This page has been intentionally left blank. Contents Preface iii Summaryv 1 Introduction1 1.1 Background................................1 1.2 StructuralComponents..........................3 1.3 Motivation.................................4 1.4 Objectives.................................5 1.5 Thesis outline...............................7 2 Methodology9 2.1 Approach.................................9 2.2 Research.................................. 11 2.3 Development............................... 11 2.4 Validation................................. 11 3 Research 13 3.1 Design................................... 13 3.2 Modeling................................. 15 3.3 Computation............................... 17 3.4 Conclusion (use cases).......................... 18 4 Results 23 4.1 Application architecture......................... 23 4.2 Conceptual building model....................... 25 4.3 Computational engine.......................... 40 4.4 User interface............................... 44 5 Validation 49 5.1 Examples................................. 49 5.2 Evaluation................................. 61 6 Discussion 65 6.1 Objectives................................. 65 6.2 Background................................ 66 6.3 Next steps................................. 67 6.4 Potential.................................. 71 ix 7 Conclusions 73 References 75 List of Figures 79 Appendices 80 A Case study 81 A.1 Background................................ 81 A.2 Structural design............................. 82 B Development process 87 B.1 Version 0.1................................ 87 B.2 Version 0.2................................ 88 B.3 Version 0.3................................ 89 C Publication 91 1 Introduction This chapter introduces the background and starting points of this study. The first section outlines relevant aspects of structural design, followed by a brief description of StructuralComponents: its approach and previous implementations. Section 1.3 describes the main motivations for this thesis, leading to the objectives outlined in Section 1.4. A description of the thesis structure is given in the last section. 1.1 Background StructuralComponents is a software-tool for the early stages of structural design. It addresses the need for flexible, insight giving tools to suit the complex and dynamic nature of conceptual design. 1.1.1 The design process The process of designing a structure is a complex process, with no predetermined ‘optimal’ result (Chapman et al., 2001). Especially in the early design stages so- lutions are developed by exploring options, with experience and creativity of the designer playing a large role. Figure 1.1 shows two trends throughout the design process. The first is accuracy of information: at the start of design, there is little precise knowledge about the design problem. As the design progresses, accuracy of information increases as the designer gains insight into the problem and develops his or her design. The oppo- site trend occurs for impact of decisions: at the start of the design process all options are open and high-level decisions are made. Later in the process, when the design has been developed, it is often costly to make changes. The effect of this trend is that engineers often have to make influential decisions when information needed to make these decisions is lacking. 1.1.2
Recommended publications
  • Parametric CAD Modeling: an Analysis of Strategies for Design Reusability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositori Institucional de la Universitat Jaume I Parametric CAD Modeling: An Analysis of Strategies for Design Reusability Jorge D. Cambaa, Manuel Conterob, Pedro Companyc aUniversity of Houston. Houston, TX. [email protected] bUniversitat Politècnica de València. Valencia, Spain. [email protected] cUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain. [email protected] Abstract CAD model quality in parametric design scenarios largely determines the level of flexibility and adaptability of a 3D model (how easy it is to alter the geometry) as well as its reusability (the ability to use existing geometry in other contexts and applications). In the context of mechanical CAD systems, the nature of the feature-based parametric modeling paradigm, which is based on parent-child interdependencies between features, allows a wide selection of approaches for creating a specific model. Despite the virtually unlimited range of possible strategies for modeling a part, only a small number of them can guarantee an appropriate internal structure which results in a truly reusable CAD model. In this paper, we present an analysis of formal CAD modeling strategies and best practices for history-based parametric design: Delphi’s horizontal modeling, explicit reference modeling, and resilient modeling. Aspects considered in our study include the rationale to avoid the creation of unnecessary feature interdependencies, the sequence and selection criteria for those features, and the effects of parent/child relations on model alteration. We provide a comparative evaluation of these strategies in the form of a series of experiments using three industrial CAD models with different levels of complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Parametric Design Thinking About Digital and Material Surface Patterns
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION 6 & 7 SEPTEMBER 2018, DYSON SCHOOL OF DESIGN ENGINEERING, IMPERIAL COLLEGE, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM PARAMETRIC DESIGN THINKING ABOUT DIGITAL AND MATERIAL SURFACE PATTERNS Wenche LYCHE, Arild BERG and Kristin ANDREASSEN OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University ABSTRACT There is a growing need in contemporary society to understand new and emerging relationships between technology and creativity. In practice-oriented areas of education such as design, many instructors have come to understand the importance of different learning styles and how students benefit when presentation of new material is varied to reach all students. The concept of parametric design thinking enabled by advanced computational processes has recently been identified as a relevant approach to design education. The present research further explores parametric design thinking through two case studies of design workshops in an educational context and how this approach can promote diversity. The first case (Robotised Clay Workshop) documents material exploration and creative and aesthetic possibilities in digitalised clay processes. The second case (Surface Patterns in Textiles: From Tradition to Digitalisation and Back) explores digitalised processes in hybrid textile design. The two case studies contribute to the exploration of parametric design thinking as an educational approach and discuss digitalisation and the relations of body, hand and mind in terms of the Vygotskyan ‘zone of proximal development’. This content was synthesised for a workshop on surface patterns for third-year bachelor design students. The paper identifies some potentials and pitfalls of this pedagogical approach and concludes that students’ awareness of conformity and diversity in the design process can be used as a starting point to explore digital surface patterns, offering students a new way of learning about function, aesthetics and product semantics through parametric design thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Parametric Design in Architecture Today: Mapping the Design Practice
    The Challenges of Parametric Design in Architecture Today: Mapping the Design Practice A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in the Faculty of Humanities 2012 Yasser Zarei School of Environment and Development Table ooofof Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Introduction to the Research ....................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2: THE POSITION OF PARAMETRICS 2.1. The State of Knowledge on Parametrics ............................................................................................. 12 2.2. The Ambivalent Nature of Parametric Design ..................................................................................... 17 2.3. Parametric Design and the Ambiguity of Taxonomy ........................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 3: THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1. The Research Methodology ................................................................................................................ 29 3.2. The Strategies of Data Analysis ........................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 4: PARAMETRIC DESIGN AND THE STATUS OF PRIMARY DRIVERS The Question of Drivers (Outside to Inside) ............................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 5: MAPPING THE ROLES IN THE PROCESS OF PARAMETRIC DESIGN 5.1. The Question Of Roles (Inside to Outside)
    [Show full text]
  • College of Architecture (08/31/21)
    Bulletin 2021-22 College of Architecture (08/31/21) dimensional and three-dimensional work, including drawing, College of drafting and making. The experiential qualities of architecture are introduced through basic considerations of scale and human interaction. The course work includes studio, work, lectures, Architecture presentations by students, readings, writing assignments and field trips. Credit 4.5 units. Phone: 314-935-6200 Email: [email protected] A46 ARCH 112 Introduction to Design Processes II Website: http://samfoxschool.wustl.edu This core design studio engages the basic principles of architectural design through iterative processes of drawing Courses and making, using a variety of tools, media and processes. The course work includes studio work, lectures, student • A46 ARCH (p. 1): Architecture presentations and local field trips. Prerequisite: A grade of C- or better in Arch 111 or co-registration in Arch 111. • A48 LAND (p. 29): Landscape Architecture Credit 3 units. Architecture A46 ARCH 112B Introduction to Design Processes II This introductory design studio course engages the basic Visit online course listings to view semester offerings for principles of architectural context, composition and experience. A46 ARCH (https://courses.wustl.edu/CourseInfo.aspx? Using the theme of Drawing and Observing, the studio integrates design and drawing to challenge the students to observe sch=A&dept=A46&crslvl=1:4). the world more carefully, creating narrative drawings that serve as a foundation for design proposals. Throughout the semester, students will engage various design processes -- A46 ARCH 108A You Are Here: Engaging St. Louis's Racial including freehand drawing, collage, orthogonal projection and History Through Site + Story model making -- that will serve as a window into the field of By acknowledging the pressures and pains of our political architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Parametric Software Tools: Optimizing Future Health Care Performance by Integrating Evidence-Based Knowledge in Architectural Design and Building Processes
    Lighting in Engineering, Architecture and the Environment 37 Design of parametric software tools: optimizing future health care performance by integrating evidence-based knowledge in architectural design and building processes J. B. Sabra & M. Mullins Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark Abstract The studies investigate the field of evidence-based design used in architectural design practice and propose a method using 2D/3D CAD applications to: 1) enhance integration of evidence-based design knowledge in architectural design phases with a focus on lighting and interior design and 2) assess fulfilment of evidence-based design criterion regarding light distribution and location in relation to patient safety in architectural health care design proposals. The study uses 2D/3D CAD modelling software Rhinoceros 3D with plug-in Grasshopper to create parametric tool prototypes to exemplify the operations and functions of the design method. To evaluate the prototype potentials, surveys with architectural and healthcare design companies are conducted. Evaluation is done by the administration of questionnaires being part of the development of the tools. The results show that architects, designers and healthcare design advisors recon the tool prototypes as a meaningful and valuable approach for 1) integrating and using evidence-based information; and 2) optimizing design processes and health care facility performances. Further study focuses on parametric information relations in Building Information
    [Show full text]
  • Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design
    Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design Mark J. Nelson Abstract Swen E. Gaudl Playing mobile games is popular among a large and Simon Colton diverse set of players, contrasting sharply with the lim- Rob Saunders ited set of companies and people who design them. We Edward J. Powley would like to democratise mobile game design by ena- Peter Ivey bling players to design games on the same devices they Blanca Pérez Ferrer play them on, without needing to program. Our concept Michael Cook of fluidic games aims to realise this vision by drawing on three design methodologies. The interaction style of The MetaMakers Institute fluidic games is that of casual creators; their end-user Falmouth University design philosophy is adapted from metadesign; and Cornwall, UK their technical implementation is based on parametric metamakersinstitute.com design. In this short article, we discuss how we’ve adapted these three methods to mobile game design, and some open questions that remain in order to em- power end user game design on mobile phones in a way that rises beyond the level of typical user- generated content. Author Keywords Mobile games; casual creators; metadesign; parametric design; end-user creativity; mixed-initiative interfaces. ACM Classification Keywords H.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation: Miscel- laneous Introduction Fluidic Games Our starting point is the observation that mobile games To support on-device casual design, we are developing have attracted a large and diverse set of players, but a what we call fluidic games [5-7]. These blur the line smaller and less diverse set of designers.
    [Show full text]
  • GUI-Based Chinese Font Editing System Using Font Parameterization Technique
    Typography and Diversity http://www.typoday.in GUI-based Chinese Font Editing System Using Font Parameterization Technique Minju Son, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, [email protected] Gyeongjae Gwon, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, [email protected] Jaeyeong Choi, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, [email protected] Geunho Jeong, Gensol Soft, Seoul, Korea, [email protected] Abstract: When creating Roman fonts, about 256 characters should be designed. Whereas creating Chinese fonts, around 8,000 widely used characters should be designed from the total 80,000 to 100,000 characters. In order to solve these problems, many studies on programmable fonts have been performed since 1980s. METAFONT is a font designing system for improving the quality of TeX typesetting in TeX document, and it represents programmable fonts. However, as METAFONT is a programming language, it is very difficult for general font designers to design fonts directly by using it. In order to solve this problem, we propose a GUI-based Chinese font editing system by font parameterization technique, which can easily edit fonts in web browser. Key words: Font Editor, Programmable Font, Font Parameterization, METAFONT. 1. Introduction Recently, the development of portable devices has increased the number of places where fonts are essential, such as e-books, websites, mobile games, books, newspapers, etc. When creating Roman fonts, about 256 characters should be designed. Whereas creating Chinese fonts, around 8,000 widely used characters should be designed from the total 80,000 to 100,000 characters. When generating fonts, characters are generally described as ‘outline’.
    [Show full text]
  • From Design Automation to Generative Design in AEC
    The Journey from Design Automation to Generative Design in AEC Dieter Vermeulen Technical Sales Specialist AEC Generative Design & Engineering @BIM4Struc © 2020 Autodesk, Inc. DESIGNS TODAY @BIM4Struc TRADITIONAL DESIGN PROCESS @BIM4Struc @BIM4Struc @BIM4Struc @BIM4Struc GENERATIVE DESIGN: A form of artificial intelligence, dedicated to the creation of better outcomes for products, buildings, infrastructure and systems. @BIM4Struc GENERATIVE DESIGN PROCESS PEOPLE COMPUTER PEOPLE @BIM4Struc STADIUM DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PLANNING SITE DRAINAGE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING SPACE PLANNING FAÇADE DESIGN @BIM4Struc Generative design is a methodology and a process more than a singular product or tool @BIM4Struc Benefits of Generative Design @BIM4Struc What level of design progression ? @BIM4Struc Traditional Design @BIM4Struc Sketching @BIM4Struc Computer Aided Drafting @BIM4Struc Parametric Design @BIM4Struc PARAMETRIC DESIGN Designer/engineer uses computer as passive machine one one limited human + computer = design @BIM4Struc PARAMETRIC MODELING @BIM4Struc Parametric Modeling a = 2 b = 1 a – b = c @BIM4Struc Parametric Modeling a = 2 b = 1 a – b = c f(x) @BIM4Struc Parametric Modeling a = 2 b = 1 a – b = c @BIM4Struc Conceptual Tower Mass – Design Model Assign Parametric Create Geometry Modify Parameters Document the Idea Constraints @BIM4Struc Design Automation @BIM4Struc input design output automation @BIM4Struc Dynamo Ecosystem to increase capabilities REVIT API Difficulty REVIT DYNAMO Expressive Power @BIM4Struc Dynamo to simplify things PROGRAMMING
    [Show full text]
  • Communication and Participation in Virtual Environments
    P. Rajagopalan and M.M Andamon (eds.), Engaging Architectural Science: Meeting the Challenges of Higher Density: 52nd 727 International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2018, pp.727–734. ©2018, The Architectural Science Association and RMIT University, Australia. Communication and Participation in Virtual Environments Towards a parametric participatory urban design decision-making platform Shuva Chowdhury Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] Marc Aurel Schnabel Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] Abstract: We seek a framework for engaging people in urban design decision-making process by employing virtual tools. We adopt our previously developed parametric tools for design communication as a bridging method between conventional and participatory urban design approaches. We hypothesise that a virtual participatory urban design platform can provide more design associated information for laypeople to participate in design decision-making. The conventional urban design approaches investigate urban form as purely through the lens of urban professionals. In participatory urban design approaches the design decisions remain as general assumptions because of lack of enough associated information. Therefore, we have developed a methodology to produce urban forms by taking advantages of computational tools to engage stakeholders in complex urban design decision-making processes. This paper focuses on designing the charrette tools. We propose a mixed method of virtual and actual to orient people in the design discussion. We investigate our tools for Karori, a neighbourhood in New Zealand. We critically conclude the paper with an overview of our virtual design communication tools which is destined to engage people in a later stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Metaphors As a Parametric Design Teaching Model: a Case Study
    The Use of Metaphors as a Parametric Design Teaching Model: A Case Study Asli Agirbas, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey Abstract Teaching methodologies for parametric design are being researched all over the world, since there is a growing demand for computer programming logic and its fabrication process in architectural education. The computer programming courses in architectural education are usually done in a very short period of time, and so students have no chance to create their own designs. This paper describes a course in which metaphors are used as a teaching methodology in parametric design, in order to let students create their own designs and learn the basic elements of parametric programming language in a short period of time with deductive reasoning. In this course, it was intended to teach visual programming language to undergraduates. Advancing under the metaphor theoretical framework, the students obtained experience in achieving form-finding process for their projects in accord with the certain constraints. Using this methodology, the students, who experienced all design stages from 3D modeling to the digital fabrication, additionally were able to develop their ability for versatile thinking and the use of more than one tool in combination, in the early years of their architectural education. Key words metaphors; Parametric Design; Form-finding; Teaching Model; Architectural Education. Introduction When parametric design is referred to, two perspectives come to mind in architecture, as was noted by Stavric and Marina (2011). One of these is the architectural constructive parametric design, and the other is the architectural conceptual parametric design. In architectural constructive parametric design, focus is made upon the forms, which are easier to produce in real life, and the work is carried out using pre-drawn 3D objects: BIM programs (such as Revit and ArchiCAD) are used for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • CAD/CAM, Parametric Design and Interactivity
    Teaching Technology: CAD/CAM, Parametric Design and Interactivity Martin Bechthold Harvard University, Graduate School of Design http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/people/faculty/bechthold/index.html [email protected] The paper discusses a project-based approach to technology teaching, and examines the case of the mobile information unit (MIU) for Harvard University and its art museums. A student competition was held to explore design alternatives for this unit. The winning entry proposed an interactive, pixilated fiber-optics display as well as touch screens. Parametric digital modeling was used in the design and design development of the scheme. Research included the study of structural alternatives, fabrication methods and the modes of interaction between users and the MIU. Keywords: Computer-aided design and manufacturing; fabrication; simulation; prototype; fiber optics. Integrating new technologies – an has taught the subject over the past two years. The introduction teaching objective is to provide an in-depth under- standing of the technology itself, and how it is ap- Computer-aided design and manufacturing (cad/ plied in practice. The teaching methods include lec- cam) techniques have been used by fabricators since tures, workshops, design exercises, case studies and the 1980s, but only fairly recently have architects field trips. In the second part of the course a more become aware of these technologies, and, more im- comprehensive design and prototyping projects portantly, have adjusted their design paradigms and has successfully allowed students to synergize the methods accordingly. Teaching efforts in this area various aspects of cad/cam technology with archi- differ significantly from teaching traditional CAAD tectural design.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Architecture, and Computation: Past and Future
    Structure, Architecture, and Computation: Past and Future [One must not] fear that the adoption of forms and volumes closely following natural laws must lead to a monotonous and unsupportable uniformity of products. —Pier Luigi Nervi RENAUD DANHAIVE INTRODUCTION Massachusetts Institute of Technology In architectural design, the past decades have been marked by the evolution of the computer from a drawing instrument to a design tool. It is clear that computation has had, and will CAITLIN MUELLER continue to have, a significant impact on the design process. Bill Addis (2007) identifies the Massachusetts Institute of Technology post-1960’s period as the Computer Age in structural design, and this classification is, if not absolute, relevant for architecture as well. Computers have not only enabled the construc- tion of some of the world’s most daring structures, but also have also given birth to new styles and visions. Styles were constructed based on the new modeling possibilities offered by software and the computer played a crucial role in the development of new architectural visions in the second part of the twentieth century (Picon, 2010). However, computation and, specifically, the development of numerical solvers for structural analysis, did not mean that engineers designed more efficient structures. On te contrary, the rise of finite element analysis enabled a ‘make-it-work’ approach, exemplified first by the Sydney Opera House of the Utzon-Arup duo and many projects after. In terms of design thinking, this represented a huge shift compared to the philosophy of engineers and architects of the 1950’s, or even of the Architectural Engineering Age in general as described by Addis (2007).
    [Show full text]