DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design Mark J. Nelson Abstract Swen E. Gaudl Playing mobile games is popular among a large and Simon Colton diverse set of players, contrasting sharply with the lim- Rob Saunders ited set of companies and people who design them. We Edward J. Powley would like to democratise mobile game design by ena- Peter Ivey bling players to design games on the same devices they Blanca Pérez Ferrer play them on, without needing to program. Our concept Michael Cook of fluidic games aims to realise this vision by drawing on three design methodologies. The interaction style of The MetaMakers Institute fluidic games is that of casual creators; their end-user Falmouth University design philosophy is adapted from metadesign; and Cornwall, UK their technical implementation is based on parametric metamakersinstitute.com design. In this short article, we discuss how we’ve adapted these three methods to mobile game design, and some open questions that remain in order to em- power end user game design on mobile phones in a way that rises beyond the level of typical user- generated content. Author Keywords Mobile games; casual creators; metadesign; parametric design; end-user creativity; mixed-initiative interfaces. ACM Classification Keywords H.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation: Miscel- laneous Introduction Fluidic Games Our starting point is the observation that mobile games To support on-device casual design, we are developing have attracted a large and diverse set of players, but a what we call fluidic games [5-7]. These blur the line smaller and less diverse set of designers. Mobile devel- between game play and game design, to the extent opment requires programming on computers using de- that games we ship with the app are simply examples velopment environments such as Apple’s XCode or of what can be created, with even key mechanics pos- Google’s Android Studio. Furthermore, even skilled sible for players to tweak or completely replace. This programmers familiar with these tools rarely treat mo- allows players to not only provide content for a fixed bile game design as a casual activity to engage in on a game, but to make new ones, either by designing novel bus ride, the way they treat mobile game playing. game mechanics directly, or by experimentation where they notice and exploit emergent mechanics [1]. A way to bring game design into the same contexts as game playing is to allow end-users to change designs We have built two fluidic game prototypes thus far, at runtime. In videogames that we could call maker- Wevva (Figs. 1-2) and No Second Chance (Fig. 3), and games, some of the appeal comes from creating new experimented with them in several cultural contexts, content. One successful mobile-game example is Big such as rapid game jams and game-design curricula. Bang Racing (Traplight, 2016) where players have cre- That experimentation, and an overview of these two ated and shared millions of tracks for a driving game. fluidic games’ designs, is explained in [7]. In this paper for brevity we focus only on the design thinking behind Options for customising such games can be extensive, fluidic games, and how this approach can (we argue) but are usually limited to the player providing or modi- meaningfully democratise mobile game design. fying what is considered “content”: art assets, levels, etc. These are important design elements, but leave Design Methods much of the game design still reserved to the designer. We draw on three existing design methods, each of Game elements such as scoring, spawning, and pro- which speaks to an aspect of the overall problem. The gress mechanisms; or aspects of the underlying physics interaction style of fluidic games is that of casual crea- simulations such as collisions and forces, aren’t “con- tors, design tools that aim for fun interfaces supporting tent” and not normally exposed for players to modify. autotelic exploration. The design philosophy is metadesign, leaving design decisions open to post- Figure 1: Wevva. The game (top) We are interested in maker-games that empower crea- release adaptation by end users. And the technical im- is modifiable in the design over- tion of casual games with genuinely new game me- plementation is parametric design, posing design as view panel (bottom). Modifiable chanics, but which require no programming, and can be navigation of explicitly parameterised design spaces. parameters include scoring, carried out directly on the target device (i.e., a mobile win/loss conditions, character phone or tablet). Our motivation here is to lower the Casual Creators icons, music, spawning, physics forces, collision responses, etc. barrier to entry to levels enjoyed by other creative do- A casual creator is “an interactive system that encour- mains, such as drawing, painting or writing stories. ages the fast, confident, and pleasurable exploration of a possibility space”, aimed at supporting autotelic crea- poses, this orientation is key to designing maker-games tivity rather than supporting task completion [2]. Key that empower users to really design their own games to a casual creator for games is that it should be enjoy- with as much creative freedom as possible, rather than able to explore the design space, just as it's enjoyable being limited to supplying content for existing games. to play games within that space, with easy switching between those modes. Parametric Design The metadesign approach is more of a design philoso- Of the casual-creator design patterns Compton and phy than a specific implementation method. In order to Mateas identify in [2], we focus most on limiting actions build fluidic games, we realise it within the framework to encourage exploration and saving and sharing. We of parametric design [12]. give players the ability to change anything within a lim- ited parametric design space, and save and share the In parametric design, possible solutions to design prob- results. In addition, they can modify games shared by lems are defined as points in a parameterised design others, rapidly switching between creating, playing, space, i.e., a multi-dimensional space defined by a sharing, receiving and modifying games. number of separate design choices or axes. This ap- proach is commonly used in fields such as architecture, Metadesign where parametric design methods are incorporated into Since fluidic games are a designed space of games, but standard CAD tools and are common enough that “par- also intended to enable end users themselves to design ametricism” has been called the dominant contempo- games, they fall into the category of metadesign [4] or rary architectural practice [10]. designing for design-after-design [3,9]. This is a catchy, if unwieldy, name for a broad class of ap- For our purposes, the parametric design approach has proaches that focus on designing open-ended, even two advantages. It gives rise to natural metaphors for “unfinished” systems that enable the systems’ users to exploring design spaces that we believe are suitable for themselves continue the design process after the initial mobile interfaces, such as navigation, where one can design of the product is ostensibly finished and the travel from design to design by moving through a de- product shipped. sign space. Parametric design representations are also amenable to automated search for designs, which pro- This approach arose out of participatory design, but vides an underlying framework to support mixed- Figure 2: Examples of two of rather than focusing on involving users in the design initiative design, i.e. the combination of user design Wevva’s design screens through process up front, as in classic participatory design, de- with automated or semi-automated approaches [6,8]. which specific parameters can be sign-after-design focuses on building systems where set. These open when players tap the design process is not closed when the system is Open Questions and Future Work the respective box in the design done from the initial designer's point of view – instead There is some tension between the three design meth- overview panel (Fig. 1, bottom). the system is designed so that “there is design (in use) ods we draw on. The enjoyable, playful user-interaction after design (in the design project)” [3]. For our pur- style of casual creators is often gained by radically lim- iting the design space. The metadesign approach, by References contrast, argues for users being able to reconfigure 1. S. Colton, M.J. Nelson, R. Saunders, et al. 2016. designs in very open-ended ways. For fluidic games to Towards a computational reading of emergence in experimental game design. In Proc. CCGW 2016. be enjoyable to design and democratise game design by empowering end users, these goals need to be real- 2. K. Compton and M. Mateas. 2015. Casual creators. In Proc. ICCC 2015, 228-235. ised simultaneously. In a parametric design setting, the concrete challenge is to identify parametric spaces that 3. P. Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In can be made fluid and fun to explore, but large enough Proc. PDC 2008, 92-101. to contain surprising designs that are qualitatively dif- 4. G. Fischer, E. Giaccardi, Y. Ye, A.G. Sutcliffe, N. ferent from the games we design as examples. Mehandjiev. 2004. Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development. CACM 47(9): 33-37. Also an open question is what people want to do (and 5. S.E. Gaudl, M.J. Nelson, S. Colton, et al. 2017. Ex- actually do) in fluidic games, and how we can support ploring novel game spaces with fluidic games. In Proc. AISB 2017. those activities. Questions here include both concrete UI design and high-level design-thinking decisions. We 6. M.J. Nelson, S. Colton, E.J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Game Level Layout from Design Specification
    EUROGRAPHICS 2014 / B. Lévy and J. Kautz Volume 33 (2014), Number 2 (Guest Editors) Game Level Layout from Design Specification Chongyang Ma∗z Nicholas Vining∗ Sylvain Lefebvrey Alla Sheffer∗ ∗ University of British Columbia y ALICE/INRIA z University of Southern California Abstract The design of video game environments, or levels, aims to control gameplay by steering the player through a sequence of designer-controlled steps, while simultaneously providing a visually engaging experience. Traditionally these levels are painstakingly designed by hand, often from pre-existing building blocks, or space templates. In this paper, we propose an algorithmic approach for automatically laying out game levels from user-specified blocks. Our method allows designers to retain control of the gameplay flow via user-specified level connectivity graphs, while relieving them from the tedious task of manually assembling the building blocks into a valid, plausible layout. Our method produces sequences of diverse layouts for the same input connectivity, allowing for repeated replay of a given level within a visually different, new environment. We support complex graph connectivities and various building block shapes, and are able to compute complex layouts in seconds. The two key components of our algorithm are the use of configuration spaces defining feasible relative positions of building blocks within a layout and a graph-decomposition based layout strategy that leverages graph connectivity to speed up convergence and avoid local minima. Together these two tools quickly steer the solution toward feasible layouts. We demonstrate our method on a variety of real-life inputs, and generate appealing layouts conforming to user specifications. Categories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): I.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling—Curve, surface, solid, and object representations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy When Form Doesn't Follow Function
    Privacy When Form Doesn’t Follow Function Roger Allan Ford University of New Hampshire [email protected] Privacy When Form Doesn’t Follow Function—discussion draft—3.6.19 Privacy When Form Doesn’t Follow Function Scholars and policy makers have long recognized the key role that design plays in protecting privacy, but efforts to explain why design is important and how it affects privacy have been muddled and inconsistent. Tis article argues that this confusion arises because “design” has many different meanings, with different privacy implications, in a way that hasn’t been fully appreciated by scholars. Design exists along at least three dimensions: process versus result, plan versus creation, and form versus function. While the literature on privacy and design has recognized and grappled (sometimes implicitly) with the frst two dimensions, the third has been unappreciated. Yet this is where the most critical privacy problems arise. Design can refer both to how something looks and is experienced by a user—its form—or how it works and what it does under the surface—its function. In the physical world, though, these two conceptions of design are connected, since an object’s form is inherently limited by its function. Tat’s why a padlock is hard and chunky and made of metal: without that form, it could not accomplish its function of keeping things secure. So people have come, over the centuries, to associate form and function and to infer function from form. Software, however, decouples these two conceptions of design, since a computer can show one thing to a user while doing something else entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Design Epistemology
    Design Research Society DRS Digital Library DRS Biennial Conference Series DRS2016 - Future Focused Thinking Jun 17th, 12:00 AM Introduction: Design Epistemology Derek Jones The Open University Philip Plowright Lawrence Technological University Leonard Bachman University of Houston Tiiu Poldma Université de Montréal Follow this and additional works at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers Citation Jones, D., Plowright, P., Bachman, L., and Poldma, T. (2016) Introduction: Design Epistemology, in Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Future Focussed Thinking - DRS International Conference 20227, 27 - 30 June, Brighton, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.619 This Miscellaneous is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at DRS Digital Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in DRS Biennial Conference Series by an authorized administrator of DRS Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction: Design Epistemology Derek Jonesa*, Philip Plowrightb, Leonard Bachmanc and Tiiu Poldmad a The Open University b Lawrence Technological University c University of Houston d Université de Montréal * [email protected] DOI: 10.21606/drs.2016.619 “But the world of design has been badly served by its intellectual leaders, who have failed to develop their subject in its own terms.” (Cross, 1982) This quote from Nigel Cross is an important starting point for this theme: great progress has been made since Archer’s call to provide an intellectual foundation for design as a discipline in itself (Archer, 1979), but there are fundamental theoretical and epistemic issues that have remained largely unchallenged since they were first proposed (Cross, 1999, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Game Design Matrix: a Step-By-Step Process for Creating Serious Games
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2020 Introducing the Game Design Matrix: A Step-by-Step Process for Creating Serious Games Aaron J. Pendleton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Game Design Commons, and the Instructional Media Design Commons Recommended Citation Pendleton, Aaron J., "Introducing the Game Design Matrix: A Step-by-Step Process for Creating Serious Games" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 4347. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4347 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCING THE GAME DESIGN MATRIX: A STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS FOR CREATING SERIOUS GAMES THESIS Aaron J. Pendleton, Captain, USAF AFIT-ENG-MS-20-M-054 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the United States Department of Defense or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENG-MS-20-M-054 INTRODUCING THE GAME DESIGN MATRIX: A STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS FOR CREATING LEARNING OBJECTIVE BASED SERIOUS GAMES THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Cyberspace Operations Aaron J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fashion Design
    FASHION DESIGN FAS 112 Fashion Basics (3-0) 3 crs. FAS Fashion Studies Presents fashion merchandise through evaluation of fashion products. Develops awareness of construction, as well as FAS 100 Industrial Sewing Methods (1-4) 3 crs. workmanship and design elements, such as fabric, color, Introduces students to basic principles of apparel construction silhouette and taste. techniques. Course projects require the use of industrial sewing equipment. Presents instruction in basic sewing techniques and FAS 113 Advanced Industrial Sewing Methods (1-4) 3 crs. their application to garment construction. (NOTE: Final project Focuses on application and mastery of basic sewing skills in should be completed to participate in the annual department Little pattern and fabric recognition and problem solving related to Black Dress competition.) individual creative design. Emphasis on technology, technical accuracy and appropriate use of selected materials and supplies. FAS 101 Flat Pattern I (1-4) 3 crs. (NOTE: This course is intended for students with basic sewing Introduces the principles of patternmaking through drafting basic skill and machine proficiency.) block and pattern manipulation. Working from the flat pattern, Prerequisite: FAS 100 with a grade of C or better or placement students will apply these techniques to the creation of a garment as demonstrated through Fashion Design Department testing. design. Accuracy and professional standards stressed. Pattern Contact program coordinator for additional information. tested in muslin for fit. Final garment will go through the annual jury to participate in the annual department fashion show. FAS 116 Fashion Industries Career Practicum and Seminar Prerequisite: Prior or concurrent enrollment in FAS 100 with a (1-10) 3 crs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parametric CAD Modeling: an Analysis of Strategies for Design Reusability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositori Institucional de la Universitat Jaume I Parametric CAD Modeling: An Analysis of Strategies for Design Reusability Jorge D. Cambaa, Manuel Conterob, Pedro Companyc aUniversity of Houston. Houston, TX. [email protected] bUniversitat Politècnica de València. Valencia, Spain. [email protected] cUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain. [email protected] Abstract CAD model quality in parametric design scenarios largely determines the level of flexibility and adaptability of a 3D model (how easy it is to alter the geometry) as well as its reusability (the ability to use existing geometry in other contexts and applications). In the context of mechanical CAD systems, the nature of the feature-based parametric modeling paradigm, which is based on parent-child interdependencies between features, allows a wide selection of approaches for creating a specific model. Despite the virtually unlimited range of possible strategies for modeling a part, only a small number of them can guarantee an appropriate internal structure which results in a truly reusable CAD model. In this paper, we present an analysis of formal CAD modeling strategies and best practices for history-based parametric design: Delphi’s horizontal modeling, explicit reference modeling, and resilient modeling. Aspects considered in our study include the rationale to avoid the creation of unnecessary feature interdependencies, the sequence and selection criteria for those features, and the effects of parent/child relations on model alteration. We provide a comparative evaluation of these strategies in the form of a series of experiments using three industrial CAD models with different levels of complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Affective Games with Physiological Input Lennart E
    Designing Affective Games with Physiological Input Lennart E. Nacke Regan L. Mandryk University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK Canada Canada [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT information about user emotion [1] and/or cognition [6]) are With the advent of new game controllers, traditional input becoming more popular in desktop software design as well mechanisms for games have changed to include gestural [2]. For human-computer interaction evaluative studies, this interfaces and camera recognition techniques, which are marks a shift from analyses centering on usability to those being further explored with the likes of Sony’s PlayStation that are looking at the full spectrum of user experience Move and Microsoft’s Kinect. Soon these techniques will (UX). These studies focus on human aspects of interaction, include affective input to control game interaction and such as the behavioral, perceptual, emotional, and cognitive mechanics. Thus, it is important to explore which game capabilities of people [5]. designs work best with which affective input technologies, giving special regard to direct and indirect methods. In this In addition to evaluating affective user responses, the use of paper, we discuss some affective measurement techniques a player’s own cognitive and emotional state as input – and development ideas for using these as control known as affective input – is an exciting input possibility mechanisms for affective game design using that has not been fully explored in the context of games [4]. psychophysiological input. Affective input has seen use as a direct method of control in accessibility applications, and as an indirect method of Author Keywords control in biofeedback training for meditation and phobia Affective computing, entertainment computing, treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parametric Design Thinking About Digital and Material Surface Patterns
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION 6 & 7 SEPTEMBER 2018, DYSON SCHOOL OF DESIGN ENGINEERING, IMPERIAL COLLEGE, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM PARAMETRIC DESIGN THINKING ABOUT DIGITAL AND MATERIAL SURFACE PATTERNS Wenche LYCHE, Arild BERG and Kristin ANDREASSEN OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University ABSTRACT There is a growing need in contemporary society to understand new and emerging relationships between technology and creativity. In practice-oriented areas of education such as design, many instructors have come to understand the importance of different learning styles and how students benefit when presentation of new material is varied to reach all students. The concept of parametric design thinking enabled by advanced computational processes has recently been identified as a relevant approach to design education. The present research further explores parametric design thinking through two case studies of design workshops in an educational context and how this approach can promote diversity. The first case (Robotised Clay Workshop) documents material exploration and creative and aesthetic possibilities in digitalised clay processes. The second case (Surface Patterns in Textiles: From Tradition to Digitalisation and Back) explores digitalised processes in hybrid textile design. The two case studies contribute to the exploration of parametric design thinking as an educational approach and discuss digitalisation and the relations of body, hand and mind in terms of the Vygotskyan ‘zone of proximal development’. This content was synthesised for a workshop on surface patterns for third-year bachelor design students. The paper identifies some potentials and pitfalls of this pedagogical approach and concludes that students’ awareness of conformity and diversity in the design process can be used as a starting point to explore digital surface patterns, offering students a new way of learning about function, aesthetics and product semantics through parametric design thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Parametric Design in Architecture Today: Mapping the Design Practice
    The Challenges of Parametric Design in Architecture Today: Mapping the Design Practice A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in the Faculty of Humanities 2012 Yasser Zarei School of Environment and Development Table ooofof Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Introduction to the Research ....................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 2: THE POSITION OF PARAMETRICS 2.1. The State of Knowledge on Parametrics ............................................................................................. 12 2.2. The Ambivalent Nature of Parametric Design ..................................................................................... 17 2.3. Parametric Design and the Ambiguity of Taxonomy ........................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 3: THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1. The Research Methodology ................................................................................................................ 29 3.2. The Strategies of Data Analysis ........................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER 4: PARAMETRIC DESIGN AND THE STATUS OF PRIMARY DRIVERS The Question of Drivers (Outside to Inside) ............................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 5: MAPPING THE ROLES IN THE PROCESS OF PARAMETRIC DESIGN 5.1. The Question Of Roles (Inside to Outside)
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretically Comparing Design Thinking to Design Methods for Large- Scale Infrastructure Systems
    The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2018) Bath, UK, January 31st – February 2nd 2018 THEORETICALLY COMPARING DESIGN THINKING TO DESIGN METHODS FOR LARGE- SCALE INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS M.A. Guerra1 and T. Shealy1 1Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA Abstract: Design of new and re-design of existing infrastructure systems will require creative ways of thinking in order to meet increasingly high demand for services. Both the theory and practice of design thinking helps to exploit opposing ideas for creativity, and also provides an approach to balance stakeholder needs, technical feasibility, and resource constraints. This study compares the intent and function of five current design strategies for infrastructure with the theory and practice of design thinking. The evidence suggests the function and purpose of the later phases of design thinking, prototyping and testing, are missing from current design strategies for infrastructure. This is a critical oversight in design because designers gain much needed information about the performance of the system amid user behaviour. Those who design infrastructure need to explore new ways to incorporate feedback mechanisms gained from prototyping and testing. The use of physical prototypes for infrastructure may not be feasible due to scale and complexity. Future research should explore the use of prototyping and testing, in particular, how virtual prototypes could substitute the experience of real world installments and how this influences design cognition among designers and stakeholders. Keywords: Design thinking, design of infrastructure systems 1. Introduction Infrastructure systems account for the vast majority of energy use and associated carbon emissions in the United States (US EPA, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Game Design Involving Online Tools
    Analyzing a Process of Collaborative Game Design Involving Online Tools Sandra B. Fan1, Brian R. Johnson2, Yun-En Liu1, Tyler S. Robison1, Rolfe R. Schmidt1, Steven L. Tanimoto1 1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering 2. Department of Architecture University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 1: {sbfan, yunliu, trobison, rolfe, tanimoto}@cs.uw.edu; 2: [email protected] Abstract collaboration tools for problem solving across a range of disciplines. In particular, we take a state-space- In this study, we explore how problem solving and search approach to modeling the design process, based design can be modeled using state-space-search on the classical AI theory of problem solving. methodology, by engaging in the design of two During each design exercise, we utilized different educational games. Additionally, we wanted to online collaboration tools: our own INFACT system, discover how online communication tools could be Google Wave beta, as well as our CoSolve used to support collaborative design. We used three environment for modeling state-space problem solving, online tools: 1) CoSolve, a collaborative problem- and we developed two games: Go Atom, a chemistry solving environment that we developed, 2) Google game, and Eco-avelli, a climate change game. Wave, a wiki/chat hybrid communication tool, and 3) In Section 2, we will describe the existing INFACT, a discussion forum that we built for use in technologies and the state-space-search design education. We used these tools to design Go Atom, a methodology in more detail. In Sections 3, 4 & 5, we chemistry game, and Eco-avelli, a game that intended will describe our specific design process of creating to demonstrate the politics of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Thinking Methods and Techniques in Design Education
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION 7 & 8 SEPTEMBER 2017, OSLO AND AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCES, NORWAY DESIGN THINKING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES IN DESIGN EDUCATION Ana Paula KLOECKNER1, Cláudia de Souza LIBÂNIO1,2 and José Luis Duarte RIBEIRO1 1PPGEP/UFRGS, Brazil 2UFCSPA, Brazil ABSTRACT Design Thinking is a human-centred innovation process, with an emphasis on deep understanding of consumers, holistically, integratively, creatively, and awe-inspiring. Design Thinking methods and techniques represents how the theory will be operationalized by following the process steps. These methods and techniques can assist in the project management, especially in the initial phase of inspiration and ideation. Another strategy that can collaborate in project management is agile management, mainly in the execution phase of a project. Agile management prioritizes individuals, interactions between them, customers, appropriate software to operate, and prompt response to changes. Thus, this study aims to propose a model to integrate design thinking and project management methods and techniques and to analyze students’ projects and interactions to verify the applicability of these in ergonomic project management. For the development of the method, it was used the design science methodology, in four main steps called: Research Clarification, Descriptive Study I, Prescriptive Study, and Descriptive Study II. From the use of tools and techniques of design thinking in a project management exercise for students of two classes, it was revealed that the tools used facilitated the project development, helping from the search and organization of information until the deadline established for the delivery of the project. Keywords: Design Thinking, Design Education, Project Management.
    [Show full text]