Webster. Chamberlain & Bean
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LAW OFFICES WEBSTER.CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN 1747 PENNSYLVANIAAVENUE. N.W. WASHINGTON.D.C. 20000 (202)785-0500 GEORGZ D WEBSTER lleBl-ln6.el OF COUNSU FAX: (202)835-0243 J COLEHAN BE*N CHIRLES E CHAMBERLAIN November 21, 1997 Dawn M. Odrowski, Esq. Office of General Counsel Federal Election Commission Sixth Floor 999 E Street, N.W. ...~,... Washington, D.C. 20463 ia:'-...: .. Re: MUR 3774 National Risht to Work Committee Dear Ms. Odrowski: The National Right to Work Committee recently discovered additional documents that are responsive to the requests contained in your letter of September 4, 1997. The documents have been organized in accordance with the separate numbered paragraphs in your September 4 letter and each batch of documents is accompanied by a cover sheet identifying the paragraphs of your letter to which that group of documents is responsive. Frank M. Northam Enclosures FMN/ctb cc: National Right to Work Committee BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ... _.... .... In the Matter of 1 ... -.._I_.... .. Witness Subpoena to ) MUR 3774 The National Right to) :--: ......... Work Committee ) ._.... 3.:.....i.: DOCUMENTS FROM NRWC Supplemental Submission in Response to Letter from FEC dated 9/4/97 Item 1.a. G (Ateach to FINAL copy) .- FROM: 4 HAVE ALL RECOMMENDED CMAEGES BEEN MADE? BYES 0 NO PROOFlNG: 1ST pfi! SUF. IO/(> REVISION NEEDED 2ND IP6 REVISION NEEDED -h Ir 3RD I0l/L( REVISION NEEDED Nb 4TH - REVISION NEEDED 5TH REVISION NEEDED 6TH / REVISION NEEDED FINAL COPY APPROVED? DATE: sc U.S. Senate Questions#: 1 2 a 4 B 6 7 8 9 Dirtrlat 2 Questions# 123456789 Floyd Spence-R YYYYYYY-Y ritz Hollings-D --------- (803) 254-5120 (803) 327-1114 i YYYYY-YYY (8031 723-0700 Will.iam Horne-R Fomy Hartnetc-R YYYYYYYYY D-kt 3 (803) 720-8860 James Bland-R YYYYYYYYY (803) 641-1408 U.S. House of Representatives Butler Derrick-D YYY-YNY-Y 1803) 225-5301 (8031 929-0208 Qu%stions#: 123456789 John Chase-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y .’. ne 1 DiatZM 4 (803! 659-8787 ill,Oberst-D --------_ Liz Pafterson-D - - - - - - - - - 1803) 527-4946 (803) 582-3650 rQmr Ravenel, Jr.-R Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Bob In91iS-R YYYYY YYYY ‘1803) 722-0174 (8031 242-6440 Y =Yes M =No 1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the “services” 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidafes opposed by union forces him to accept? n:embers? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which I. Will you oppose so-called “anti-double breasting” legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has, as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees of consmction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hadey Act. which aulhorizes state Right (0 Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal antiextortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose lo work during a smke, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federa1, state. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse ta force their employees to pay union dues? Note: The National Right to Work Committee. of course, endorses no candidates. We are a nonpartisan organization. Bui we believe that you as a Right to Work supporter are. entitled to know which candidates will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. U.S. Senate Questions# 123456789 Dfstriat 2 Quasiions#: i 23456789 Floyd Spence-R YYYYYYY-Y Job SpKatt-D --------- Fritz Hollingo-D - - - - - - - - - 1803) 254-5120 (803) 327-1114 (803) 779-8400 William Horne-R YYYYY -Y YY Tomy Hartnett-R YYYYYYYYY Dfstriat 3 (803) 494-2641 1803) 884-4244 James Eland-R YYYYYYYYY .. (803) 641-1408 akhriot 6 .3.S... House of Representatives Butler Derrick-0 YYY-YNY-Y Jim Clyburn-D - - - - - - - - - 5. ,> (8031 225-5301 (803) 929-0208 ... .~.. .: Quastions #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 John Chase-R YYYYYYYYY ~.iQiutriak 1 nfstrio+ 4 1802: 669-8787 dill Oberst-D - - - - - - - - - Liz Patterson-D - - - - - - - - - 1803) 527-4946 1803) 562-3650 ?-Arthur Ravenel, Jr.-R Y YY Y Y Y Y N Y Bob Inglis-R YYYYYYYYY .~... (803) 722-0174 (803) 242-6440 - .~,... .. L~i .. Survey Questions 1. Do you believe an employee who does not want the "services" 6. Will you support amendments to the Federal Election of a labor union should have the right to refuse to accept that Campaign Act to prohibit the use of compulsory union dues union as his exclusive representative, which federal law now and fees for political causes and candidates opposed by union forces him to accept? members? 2. Will you support repeal of the provisions in federal laws which 7. Will you oppose so-called "anti-double breasting" legislation authorize compulsory unionism? that has. as its primary goal, to forcibly unionize employees G: construction companies? 3. Do you favor preservation of Section 14@) of the Taft-Wey Act, which authorizes state Kight to Work laws? 8. Will you oppose legislation to weaken or destroy the Hatch Act, which protects federal employees from union political 4. Would you support legislation to end the special immunity coercion? union officials presently enjoy from prosecution under the federal anti-extortion statute? 9. Will you oppose legislation that would punish or require the firing of employees who choose to work during a strike, and 5. Will you oppose the forced unionization of federal, scare. give union officials the power to shut down businesses that county and municipal employees? refuse to force their employees to pay union dues? - Note: The National Right to Work Committee, of course, endorses no cam.iidates. We art! a nonpanisan organization. But we believe that you as a Rjghr to Work suppomr are entitled to know which candidales will support the right of every American to earn a living - without having to pay union bosses for the privilege. 1 BACKGROUNDER The information below is helpful in explaining the questions on the reverse side of thic form. A union, under present federal laws, is empowered to the administration of President John E Kennedy. represent and bind all employees in a company‘s bargaining unit - including employees who oppose the union and don’t 6. Labor unions are the only private organization in the U.S. want its “services.” which can legally force individuals IO pay dues into their This monopoly bargaining power, generally described as treasuries. “exclusive bargaining rights,” deprives employees of their right The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits union to bargain for themselves. Union officials fought for this power officials from giving any of these dues dollars directly to il and refuse to give it up; yet they complain they are “unfairly candidate for federal office. burdened by the legal obligation” to represent nonmembers. An the same time, FECA permits union officials to use Such complaints are intended to pave the way for compelling workers’ conipulsory dues dollars for “in-kind” political i..fiancial support from so-called “free riders” for representation spending on goods and services to elect candidates for federal :~.they do not want offices. These “in-kind” expenditures are in addition to union PAC ~ The f~ngof workers who refuse to pay union dues and/or contributions; they are seldom if ever documented or fees is explicitly sanctioned by both the National Labor - - Relations Act and the National Railway Labor Act reponed to the Federal Election Commission. Section 7 of the NLRA. For example, stipulates that No official statistics for total union “in-kind” expenditures are available. But Labor columnist Victor Riesel estimated that -:.employees.. shall have “the right to refrain” from participating in this so-called “sofi money” amounted to 10 times more than junion activities “except to the extent that such right may be ‘affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor what union PACs gave in CE.~ contributions. Based on that ’:~‘organization as a condition of employment.” yardstick, union “soft money’’ in 1990 exceeded $350 million. ..~. .... The problem of compulsory unionism was created by 7. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Congress Congress. It will not be solved until Congress repeals the to automatically impose union representation upon workers of ....~: existing federal authorizations of compulsory unionism. .... ~. nonunionized companies which have even the slightest to ~ economic links unionized companies. 3:-. ~... < In 21 stales, wage earners - except those covered by the National Railway Labor Act - are. shielded from compulsory Even though the nonunionized and the unionized companies unionism by Right to Work laws. each perform separate and distinct work, the compulsory union The Florida guarantee is typical of these laws, saying, ‘The conwact would be automatically imposed upon the nonunion right of persons to work shall not be denied or abridged on workers, without even the show of an election conducted by the account of membership or nonmembership in any labor union or National Labor Relations Board to determine worker suppon. labor organization.” The “anti-double breasting” legislation would also encourage The authority of states to adopt and enforce such laws is Common Situs picketing by permitting union organizers to use reaffmed by Section 14@) of the Taft-Hartley amendments to a dispuw with a single subcontractor as an excuse to picket and the National Labor Relations Act.