The Global Justice and Solidarity Movement and the World Social Forum : a Backgrounder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Global Justice and Solidarity Movement and the World Social Forum : a Backgrounder THE GLOBAL JUSTICE AND SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT AND THE WORLD SOCIAL FORUM : A BACKGROUNDER Peter Waterman he WSF is probably best identified with the recent international wave of protest T known as the 'anti-globalisation movement'. While intimately interrelated with the latter, the WSF is just one emanation of this much more general phenomenon and process. How can these and their inter-relationship be best understood ? It is possible to make a 19th-20th century comparison, with the relationship between trade unions or labour parties on the one hand and 'the labour movement' on the other. But the labour movement, whilst obviously broader and looser than any particular institution, and having international expression, consisted largely of other, primarily national, institutions (co-operatives, women's organisations, publications). The WSF is an essentially international event (or an expanding series of such). And on the other hand, we have an essentially international movement that might not even (yet ?) recognise itself as such. So we are confronted with two new social phenomena — of the period of globalisation, that are both international and global, and that have a novel relationship with each other. The WSF — promoted by an identifiable group of Brazilian, French and other non-governmental organisations, trade unions and individuals — is itself linked organically to the more general movement. This is through an informal Forum event, known as the ‘Call of Social Movements’, which has been attended, and its regular declarations signed, by many WSF participant bodies (see this volume). The Call formalised itself between WSF2-3 with a Social Movements International Secretariat. But this body, or tendency, is a matter of discomfort for those within the WSF who want to see the Forum as a 'space' rather than a 'movement'.1 The 'Global Justice and Solidarity Movement' (GJ&SM) is actually a name proposed by the Call, for the general wave of protest against corporate-dominated globalisation, against US-sponsored neoliberalism / neo-conservatism and war, one name for the new wave of radical-democratic protest and counter-proposition. This The WSF : Challenging Empires 'movement of movements' is marked by its network form and communication activity; a matter recognised by friends and enemies alike.2 Moreover, 'it' seems to change size, shape, reach, scale, target and aims according to events. So, at one moment it might be focussed against neoliberal economic globalisation, at another against the US-led war on Iraq. This makes it even more challenging to analyse than to name. Like any novel phenomenon, the GJ&SM is easier to characterise by what it is not than by what it is : ◗ It is not an international labour or socialist movement, though unions and socialists are prominently involved; ◗ It is not a 'transnational advocacy network',3 though it is much marked by the presence of international and national NGOs; ◗ It is not a reincarnation of the international protest wave following Antecedents : Critical Perspectives 1968, though Che Guevara icons are still popular, and it includes other clear echoes of the sixties and seventies; ◗ It is not an anarchist movement, though anarchists, autonomists and libertarians are highly active within it; ◗ It is not a nationalist or thirdworldist movement, though nationalist, thirdworldist and anti-imperialist forces and notes can be clearly identified within it; It is, on the other hand, not too difficult to identify a rising number of processes that have provoked this movement. These include : ◗ the increasing predominance, in the international sphere, of multinational corporations and international financial institutions, along with the neoliberal policies that have been imposed on both North and the South (Table); ◗ The shrinking of the public sphere and reduction of State social programmes and subsidies; ◗ the feminisation of poverty, the commodification of women (the sex trade), the simultaneous formal endorsement and political denial of women's and sexual rights; ◗ de-industrialisation, unemployment and the informalisation of employment; ◗ the ideology of competitiveness as the court of first and last appeal; ◗ the undermining of market protection (primarily of weaker national economies); ◗ the simultaneous preaching and practical undermining of traditional structures and notions of national sovereignty; ◗ the simultaneous creation of new international institutions and regulations, alongside the marginalisation of the United Nations and such agencies as the International Labour Organisation (ILO); ◗ increasing talk of and the continuing undermining of ecological sustainability; corporate attempts to copyright genetic resources, to genetically modify foodstuffs, to commercialise them and then coerce people into buying them; the continuation and even increase of militarism, militarisation and warfare despite hopes raised by the end of the Cold War; 56 The WSF : Challenging Empires ◗ the increase in globalised epidemics and threats to the climate; GJ & ◗ the demonisation of immigrants, asylum-seekers, and of Islam and other SM : Backgrounder Waterman Peter 'others'. All these have dramatically raised social tensions, particularly in the South, but also in the East (the ex-Communist world) and even in such model core capitalist welfare states as Canada and Sweden. The pressures have also provoked major conservative, reactionary, religious and ethnic backlashes, of a violent and repressive nature, sometimes internationally co-ordinated. Many identify the new protest movements of the emerging century with the North — Seattle 1999, Prague 2000, Genoa 2001, Gothenburg 2001, Barcelona 2002, Evian 2003. They also associate it with the middle classes, students and youth, who have indeed been prominent within it. But so have women, forming around 50 per cent at the World Social Forums, though this is little commented on. But the movement cannot be limited to major protest events, nor to what has occurred since 1999. It must be traced both back and down, at least to the ‘food riots’ provoked by the IMF in the South of the eighties, when there were urban uprisings against the externally-imposed end of food subsidies. Widespread protests against gigantic and ecologically damaging dam projects, promoted by the World Bank and developmentalist local elites, go back to the eighties and earlier. There were major demonstrations and riots against the poll tax in Britain in 1990. Through the 1990s, there were myriad protests across the South against the euphemistically-named Structural Adjustment Policies (SAPs) in particular, and neoliberal policies more generally. And the appearance of the often corporatist, sometimes chauvinist and commonly quiescent US AFL-CIO on the anti-WTO demonstration in Seattle, was welcomed — (somewhat prematurely ?) — by the slogan ‘Teamsters and Turtles : Together at Last!’.4 One major manifestation of US-initiated neoliberalism has been the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which provoked widespread protest in both Canada and Mexico. In the case of Canada, it turned an initial national-protectionist campaign into one of international solidarity, first with Mexico, then with Latin America more generally, leading to the Hemispheric Social Alliance, which included the USA. In the case of Mexico, the launching date of the NAFTA, January 1, 1994, was used for the launching also of the Zapatista movement in the severely globalised, marginalised and exploited state of Chiapas, in the South of Mexico.5 Initially appearing as a classical armed guerrilla movement based on the discriminated and land-hungry Mayan ethnic communities of Chiapas, the Zapatistas rapidly revealed entirely novel characteristics : an address to Mexican civil society, a high-profile internationalism, a sophisticated understanding and use of both the mass media and alternative electronic communications. All can be found in the speeches and writings of its primary spokesperson, Sub-Commander Marcos (Rafael Guillén) a university-educated non-indigene, trained in guerrilla warfare in Cuba. Activities of the Zapatistas, particularly two international encuentros, one in Chiapas, 1996, one in Spain, 1997, gave rise, or shape, to a new wave of internationalism. The powerful, poetic and playful words of Marcos, who switches between, or combines, popular 57 The WSF : Challenging Empires Mayan and Mexican idiom with the language of cosmopolitan intellectuals, enchanted a dulled world. It had a dramatic appeal on several fronts. An international Left, battered, bruised and disoriented by : the downscaling of the welfare state; the downsizing of the working class; the halting of the forward march of labour; the collapse of Eastern Communist and Southern Populist states; and the crisis of the international movements identified with such. Zapatista encounters also inspired at least two significant emanations of the movement, People’s Global Action (PGA) and the WSF itself.6 Other major sources of, or contributors to the new movement must be mentioned particularly the rising wave of protest against unemployment, privatisation and cuts in social services gathering steam throughout the nineties, markedly in Europe and the increasing development of ‘counter-expertise’, concentrated in international and national NGOs which had been honed at a series of UN conferences and summits through the 1990s — notably the 1992 World Conference on Environment and Development and the Antecedents : Critical Perspectives 1995 UN Fourth World
Recommended publications
  • Open Cosmopolitanism and the World Social Forum: Global Resistance, Emancipation, and the Activists’ Vision of a Better World
    Globalizations, 2017 Vol. 14, No. 4, 504–518, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1254413 Open Cosmopolitanism and the World Social Forum: Global Resistance, Emancipation, and the Activists’ Vision of a Better World GIUSEPPE CARUSO ∗,∗∗ ∗NHS England, Redditch, UK ∗∗Richmond Fellowship, London, UK ABSTRACT The World Social Forum (WSF) is the world’s largest activist network to date. Its global, regional, national, and thematic events have gathered since 2001 millions of participants and thousands of civil society and social movement organisations. Its cosmopolitan vision is built on resistance to the planetary domination by neo-liberal globalisation. This paper unpacks WSF’s cosmopolitan project and reflects on its vision of emancipated individuals, convivial communities, and a just planetary society in harmony with the environment. In its open organisational space, WSF’s cosmopolitan project develops while in the process of political action rather than prior to that. At the same time, power dynamics, ideological cleavages, and pragmatic concerns about organisation and strategy challenge WSF’s ability to pursue its goals. However, it is these internal tensions that make WSF’s cosmopolitan project both more difficult to achieve and more realistic than claims of universal unity among all its participants. Keywords: World Social Forum, open cosmopolitanism, global justice movement, global resistance 1. Introduction The resurgence over the past three decades of a cosmopolitan discourse is related to, on the one hand, the expansion of market-led globalisation and, on the other, the intensification of social and political mobilisation for social justice. The fall of the Berlin Wall introduced a vision of global unity predicated on the global spread of neo-liberal doctrines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Bases of the Global Justice Movement Some Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Evidence from the First European Social Forum
    The Social Bases of the Global Justice Movement Some Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Evidence from the First European Social Forum Donatella della Porta Civil Society and Social Movements United Nations Programme Paper Number 21 Research Institute December 2005 for Social Development This United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) Programme Paper has been produced with the support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). UNRISD also thanks the governments of Denmark, Finland, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom for their core funding. Copyright © UNRISD. Short extracts from this publication may be reproduced unaltered without authorization on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to UNRISD, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNRISD welcomes such applications. The designations employed in UNRISD publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNRISD con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the author(s), and publication does not constitute endorse- ment by UNRISD. ISSN 1020-8178 Contents Acronyms ii Summary/Résumé/Resumen iii Summary iii Résumé iv Resumen v Introduction 1 1. Social Characteristics of Political Activists: Four Main Hypotheses 1 2. The Global Justice Movement as a “Movement of Movements”? 6 3. Generations of Activists 9 4. Gender in Movements 10 5. New Middle Class and New Social Movements 12 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Autonomy of Struggles and the Self-Management of Squats: Legacies of Intertwined Movements Miguel A
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 11 (1): 178 – 199 (July 2019) Martínez, The Autonomy of Struggles The autonomy of struggles and the self-management of squats: legacies of intertwined movements Miguel A. Martínez Abstract How do squatters’ movements make a difference in urban politics? Their singularity in European cities has often been interpreted according to the major notion of ‘autonomy’. However, despite the recent upsurge of studies about squatting (Cattaneo et al. 2014, Katsiaficas 2006, Martínez et al. 2018, Van der Steen et al. 2014), there has not been much clarification of its theoretical, historical and political significance. Autonomism has also been identified as one of the main ideological sources of the recent global justice and anti-austerity movements (Flesher 2014) after being widely diffused among European squatters for more than four decades, which prompts a question about the meaning of its legacy. In this article, I first examine the political background of autonomism as a distinct identity among radical movements in Europe in general (Flesher et al. 2013, Wennerhag et al. 2018), and the squatters in particular—though not often explicitly defined. Secondly, I stress the social, feminist and anti-capitalist dimensions of autonomy that stem from the multiple and specific struggles in which squatters were involved over different historical periods. These aspects have been overlooked or not sufficiently examined by the literature on squatting movements. By revisiting relevant events and discourses of the autonomist tradition linked to squatting in Italy, Germany and Spain, its main traits and some contradictions are presented. Although political contexts indicate different emphases in each case, some common origins and transnational exchanges justify an underlying convergence and its legacies over time.
    [Show full text]
  • For a Democratic Cosmopolitarian Movement Proposal Papers Series Papers Proposal
    Social Movement and World Governance For a democratic cosmopolitarian movement Proposal Papers Series Papers Proposal Jean Rossiaud November 2012 Proposal Papers The Forum for a new World Governance encourages the development and circulation of a series of Proposal Papers. The papers present the most relevant proposals for generating the breakthroughs and changes necessary for building a new, fairer and more sustainable world governance. The Proposal Papers are published in different languages and cover five broad categories of world governance: - Environment and management of the planet - The economy and globalization - Politics, state structures and institutions - Peace, security and armed conflicts - Knowledge, science, education and the information and communication society. Forum for a new World Governance November 2012 www.world-governance.org Graphic design: Elsa Lescure Cover image: mounted from a photograph of Cooperativa Sub (Argentina) English translation: Philippa Bowe Smith & Giles Smith http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.fr This Proposal Paper is available under a Creative Commons License allowing users to use, reproduce and circulate it on condition that they mention the title, authors and Forum for a new World Governance. Social Movement and World Governance For a democratic cosmopolitarian movement Jean Rossiaud November 2012 I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to the FnWG, especially Gustavo Marin, whose benevolent tenacity was only equalled by his uncompromising analysis of my ideas. I would also like to thank Arnaud Blin and Fabienne Fischer for their ever-helpful remarks and suggestions. “And here we can feel that we are approaching a significant revolution (so significant that it may not take place), the revolution relating to the great paradigm of Western science (and, consequentially, of metaphysics, sometimes the negative image of science, sometimes its counterpart) […].
    [Show full text]
  • No Political Voice, No Future Contribution to GTI Forum Farewell to the World Social Forum?
    October 2019 No Political Voice, No Future Contribution to GTI Forum Farewell to the World Social Forum? Francine Mestrum So much has been said already about the World Social Forum, its past and its future, its successes and its failures. There is certainly no consensus about any of these. There is a past with many successes and some major failures. Whether there is a future will depend on what our objectives are. The world has changed since 2001, the year the WSF premiered. Looking back, while thinking of a possible future, I wonder if our major mistake has been that we have never clarified what exactly we wanted. “Another world is possible”—certainly, it still is, but for whom and from what perspective? It was an excellent slogan, but it allowed us to never say how “other,” how different, and in what way, that new world would be. As Roberto Savio says, the direct impetus for the WSF was an outcry against neoliberalism, structural adjustment, the austerity policies of the international organizations, and the financialization of the economy. There was still some hope that, ten years after the end of the Cold War, there was a possibility for peace, for better international relations, for global governance, for progress and development. In the early Forums, according to my research, the demands for real system change were, in fact, rare.1 There was very little talk of anti-capitalism, socialism, or revolutionary strategies. The radical alternatives discussed focused on social relations, participation, and a solidarity economy beyond markets. There was very little anti-globalization, but more alter-globalization with demands for a fair global order, based on the United Nations as opposed to the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Justice Movement
    HOME VIEWS & REVIEWS AUTHORS INDEX SEARCH SUBSCRIBE No. 19, July 1, 2010 The Global Justice Movement Geoffrey Pleyers Department of Sociology and Anthropology Belgian Foundation for Scientific Research (FNRS) Abstract: After providing a brief overview of the global justice movement history, this article analyzes the main argument raised by its activists to oppose the neoliberal ideology, as notably asserted by the shifts in the discourses of some G20 leaders. Activists however call attention to the gap between the speeches of the G20 leaders and the measures actually implemented. Accordingly, global justice activists have decided to focus on seeking concrete outcomes through the following: specialized advocacy networks, empowerment at the local level and alliances with progressive regimes. Keywords: alter-globalization, financial and economic crisis, G20, neoliberalism, poverty reduction, US Social Forum, Washington Consensus 1 Between June 22 and 27, 2010, Detroit hosted the second US Social Forum with some 15,000 activists in attendance. Since the first World Social Forum in 2001, “Social Forums” have become major events of the global justice movement (also called “alter- globalization”). Similar meetings have been organized at the local, national, continental, and global level. They allow activists to share their experience, successes, and challenges, to discuss alternative practices or policies and to elaborate common strategies on issues ranging from local community life to global warming and finance regulation. 2 The first US Social Forum (USSF) was held in 2007 in Atlanta. Some 10,000 activists attended it from a wide range of political sympathies, including the non-profit sector, local movements, alternative liberals, anarchist networks, and a strong participation of Pleyers, GSJ 19(1 July 2010), 1 minorities (Smith & Juris, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and the Emergence of the World Social Forums
    01_Smith_Ch1.qxd 4/2/07 3:46 PM Page 1 Chapter One GLOBALIZATION AND THE EMERGENCE OF THE WORLD SOCIAL FORUMS n the 1970s and 1980s, protests against the lending policies of Ithe International Monetary Fund (IMF) emerged in the global south. By the late 1990s, tens of thousands of protesters were gathering wherever the world’s political and economic elite met, raising criticisms of global economic policies and calling for more just and equitable economic policies. As the numbers of protesters grew, so did the violence with which governments responded. Governments spent millions and arrested hundreds of nonviolent protesters to ensure their meetings could take place. Italian police killed Carlo Giuliani, a twenty-three-year-old pro- tester, at the meeting of the Group of 8 (G8) in Genoa in 2001, dramatizing for activists in the global north the brutal repression against activists that is common in the global south.The size of police mobilizations against these overwhelmingly nonviolent protests was unprecedented in Western democracies, and it sig- naled the declining legitimacy of the system of economic glob- alization promoted by the world’s most powerful governments. After years of such protests against the world’s most powerful economic institutions—the World Bank,International Monetary 1 01_Smith_Ch1.qxd 4/2/07 3:46 PM Page 2 2CHAPTER ONE Fund, the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the G8—a team of Latin American and French activists launched the first World Social Forum (WSF) in January 2001. Over just a few short years, the WSF has become the largest political gathering in modern history and a major focal point of global efforts to promote an alternative vision of global integra- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Discourses on the World Social Forums:Towards Comparative Analyses 1
    Media discourses on the World Social Forums Media discourses on the World Social Forums:Towards comparative analyses 1 Jan Ekecrantz 2* The reflections to be presented in this and a parallel article by Maia and Castro are based on ongoing studies of Brazilian, Swedish and Russian and Chinese media materials dealing with the World Social Forums (WSF) in 2001-2004. The overriding question in this paper concerns the ways mainstream media of very different societies have re-constructed the global and local issues addressed by the Forums. Of the four market-oriented economies, Communist China and Post-Socialist Russia stand out as being almost silent about the WSF, favouring economic globalization - seemingly at odds with cultural globalization. In Brazil and Sweden the dominant media harbour contradictory discourses reflecting different political positions visavi the WSF. World Social Forums – dominant media – cultural globalization As reflexões aqui presentes, assim como o artigo de Maia e Castro publicado nesta revista, encontram-se baseados em uma investigação em curso sobre o material divulgado pela mídia brasileira, sueca, russa e chinesa sobre as edições do Fórum Social Mundial (FSM) de 2001 a 2004. Este artigo explora, como questão principal, os modos pelos quais a chamada grande mídia de sociedades bastante diferentes reconstruíram os tópicos locais e globais suscitados pelos Fóruns. Das quatro economias orientadas pelo mercado, a China comunista e a Rússia pós- socialista mantêm um silêncio quase completo sobre o FSM, favorecendo a globalização econômica, e, aparentemente, afastando-se da globalização cultural. No Brasil e na Suécia, a mídia dominante encampa discursos contraditórios refletindo posições políticas diferentes sobre o FSM.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Economic Forum – a Partner in Shaping History
    The World Economic Forum A Partner in Shaping History The First 40 Years 1971 - 2010 The World Economic Forum A Partner in Shaping History The First 40 Years 1971 - 2010 © 2009 World Economic Forum All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system. World Economic Forum 91-93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212 Fax +41 (0)22 786 2744 e-mail: [email protected] www.weforum.org Photographs by swiss image.ch, Pascal Imsand and Richard Kalvar/Magnum ISBN-10: 92-95044-30-4 ISBN-13: 978-92-95044-30-2 “Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always ineffective, concerning all acts of initiative (and creation). There is one elementary truth the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one’s favour all manner of unforeseen incidents and meetings and material assistance which no man could have dreamed would have come his way. Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now.” Goethe CONTENTS Foreword 1 Acknowledgements 3 1971 – The First Year 5 1972 – The Triumph of an Idea 13 1973 – The Davos Manifesto 15 1974 – In the Midst of Recession 19
    [Show full text]
  • “Cosmopolitan Or Colonial? the World Social Forum As „Contact Zone‟”1
    1 “Cosmopolitan or Colonial? The World Social Forum as „Contact Zone‟”1 by Janet Conway ([email protected]) Biographical note: Janet Conway is Canada Research Chair in Social Justice at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. Her area of specialization is social movements and globalization. She has been engaged in research on the World Social Forum since 2002 and is currently writing a book on this subject. Abstract: Although the impressive diversity of the World Social Forum is regularly noted, there has been little analytical work done on the degree to which the praxis of the WSF is enabling communicability across previously unbridged difference and how relations of power, particularly the coloniality of power, shape these interactions. Based on extensive participant-observation and interviewing at the WSF, this article analyzes the WSF as a „contact zone‟ that, in different facets of its complex praxis, is both cosmopolitan and colonial. The author employs the differing conceptions of the contact zone, drawing on the work of Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Mary Louise Pratt, in dialogue with notions of coloniality and colonial difference arising from Latin American studies to illumine the analysis. Key words: coloniality of knowledge/power; contact zone; World Social Forum Introduction Since its appearance in 2001, the World Social Forum has become the preeminent site for the encounter, transformation, and agglomeration of movement knowledges arising from subaltern struggles rooted in specific social and geographical locations/identities. Although the impressive diversity of the WSF is regularly noted, there has been little analytical work done on the degree to which the praxis of the WSF is enabling communication across previously unbridged difference -- beyond co-presence in the open space -- and how relations of power, and particularly the coloniality of power shape these interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization, Development and Social Justice
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bichler & Nitzan Archives Globalization Development and Social Justice Are there existing alternatives to corporate globalization? What are the prospects for and commonalities between communities and movements such as Occupy, the World Social Forum and alternative economies? Globalization Development and Social Justice advances the proposition that another globalization is not only possible, but already exists. It demonstrates that there are multiple pathways towards development with social justice and argues that enabling propositional agency, rather than oppositional agency such as resis- tance, is a more effective alternative to neoliberal globalization. El Khoury devel- ops a theory of infraglobalization that emphasizes creative constitution, not just contestation, of global and local processes. The book features case studies and examples of diverse economic practice and innovative emergent political forms from the Global South and North. These case studies are located in the informal social economy and community development, as well as everyday practices, from prefigurative politics to community cooperatives and participatory planning. This book makes an important contribution to debates about the prospects for, and practices of, a transformative grassroots globalization, and to critical debates about globalization and development strategies. It will be of interest to students and scholars of international relations, globalization, social
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Globalization Or Alter-Globalization? Mapping the Political Ideology of the Global Justice Movement1
    International Studies Quarterly (2012) 56, 439–454 Anti-Globalization or Alter-Globalization? Mapping the Political Ideology of the Global Justice Movement1 Manfred B. Steger RMIT University and University of Hawai’i-Manoa and Erin K. Wilson University of Groningen Globalization has unsettled conventional, nationally based political belief systems, opening the door to emerging new global political ideologies. While much analytic focus has been on ideational transformations related to market globalism (neoliberalism), little attention has been given to its growing number of ideologi- cal challengers. Drawing on data collected from 45 organizations connected to the World Social Forum, this article examines the political ideas of the global justice movement, the key antagonist to market globalism from the political Left. Employing morphological discourse analysis and quantitative content analysis, the arti- cle assesses the ideological coherence of ‘‘justice globalism’’ against Michael Freeden’s (1996) three criteria of distinctiveness, context-bound responsiveness, and effective decontestation. We find that justice globalism displays ideological coherence and should be considered a maturing political ‘‘alter’’-ideology of global sig- nificance. The evidence presented in this article suggests the ongoing globalization of the twenty-first-century ideological landscape. The breakdown of the Cold War order organized emerging global ideologies. Much-needed assessments around the opposing ideological poles of capitalist lib- of the transformation of the contemporary ideological eralism vs collectivist communism and the ensuing landscape have largely been confined to what has been wave of globalization have unsettled conventional variously referred to as ‘‘neoliberalism,’’ ‘‘globaliza- political belief systems. Across political, social, tion-from-above,’’ or ‘‘market globalism’’ (Falk 1999; economic, and cultural dimensions, globalizing forces Barber 2001; Mittelman 2004; Harvey 2005; Steger both generate and respond to new ‘‘global problems’’ 2009).
    [Show full text]