DOCSLIB.ORG

Eu Elections Snapshot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eu Elections Snapshot EU ELECTIONS SNAPSHOT BY FTI CONSULTING BRUSSELS CRITICAL THINKING AT THE CRITICAL TIME™ Eurosceptics rock the boat but old guard still captains the ship Euroscepticism makes its mark Parliament President. On the other hand the UK has lost its Conservative MEP As predicted, the most significant Martin Callanan, who led the ECR group, 2009 development of the elections is the rise and Graham Watson the leader of the UK of the hardcore eurosceptic parties. On ALDE group. From ALDE, former Belgian the right they command 141 seats, up Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt will remain from 99 seats in the current Parliament. an influential MEP and so will Martin 2014 In addition the constructive eurosceptic Schulz from the S&D. ECR group has won 44 seats (down from 57). With 185 seats, the eurosceptic groups Marine Le Pen and Nigel Farage, the on the right will have an important say in leaders of the largest French and British the legislature. Much will depend on the eurosceptic parties, can be expected to question whether the strongest parties, make themselves heard very loudly during the French Front National and the British the Parliament’s Plenary sessions. UKIP, both with 24 seats, will manage to join in a group together with other Political Issues eurosceptic parties. If this is the case The rise of the eurosceptic parties will they will form the third strongest group. inevitably lead to stronger discussions However, the participation of such parties on institutional reforms of the EU, much in the Parliament’s day-to-day work is more aggressively than in the current not certain: in the past, their MEPs have Parliament. usually not attended committee meetings. The projected trade deal with the USA, The new majorities and impact on the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment decision-making Partnership (TTIP), has featured strongly The centre-right EPP and centre-left S&D, in the election campaigns, and has been both pro-European, will remain by far the criticised both from the right and the left. strongest groups. The EPP has now won It will be a challenge to gain sufficient 212 seats (down from 273) and the S&D support from the European Parliament, 186 seats (down from 196). Together they which must ratify a deal negotiated by the have a comfortable majority, and as in the Commission. previous Parliament many legislative files Other issues that are going be of will be carried through by an agreement importance in the short term are financial between these two groups. However, reform, energy, climate change and data if EPP and S&D do not manage to find protection. Only when we see the make- a joint position, the EPP will not have up of the responsible Committees, namely a majority with the other centre-right ECON, ITRE, ENVI and LIBE, will it possible groups such as the liberal ALDE, which to say in which directions these files will go. has now 70 seats (down from 83), and the ECR. Together these three groups Turnout often formed a coalition in the outgoing Parliament, gaining the upper hand in With 43%, the turnout is fractionally higher many legislative files. In the next five years than in 2009, so for the first time since the GUE/NGL Verts/ALE PPE EFD Other the centre-right groups might therefore European Parliament was elected directly be forced to join forces with some of the in 1979 the turnout has not decreased. S&D ALDE ECR NI hardcore eurosceptic groups to gain a However, considering the effort put into majority against the centre-left. The fact the election campaigns, in particular by the that the German and the British liberals, candidates for the Commission Presidency both from the pro-business wing of the and the much stronger media coverage, ALDE group, have lost dramatically will the turnout is certainly a disappointment. 2014 make it more difficult to forge a business- In some countries such as Slovakia (13%) friendly position. The Greens have only lost and Czech Republic (18%) the turnout slightly (down from 57 to 55 seats) and will itself is a blow to the EU. probably maintain their influence on issues Next steps 2019 such as environment, climate and energy. Next Commission President: Juncker’s The new Parliament will assemble in hand strengthened? Brussels for the first time on 2 June, and will spend the rest of the month This election marks the first in which negotiating the formation of its political the Parliament’s groups have put groups – while these will mostly follow the forward their own candidates for same lines as in the outgoing Parliament, European Commission President, based the affiliation of some national delegations on a generous interpretation of the is not certain, and for the new eurosceptic Parliament’s new powers under the EU MEPs in particular much is still up in the treaty. For S&D group candidate Martin air. MEPs will also use this time to decide Schulz, the outcome is a disappointment; who sits on which committees, which is EPP candidate Jean-Claude Juncker important as these are the engine rooms of has come out strengthened in his bid to the Parliament’s legislative work; and they lead the next Commission. However, his will elect the next Parliament President, a majority is not clear enough to make his prestigious position which has traditionally candidacy a certainty. The next days and been split between the two main political weeks will show whether he can gather groups (EPP and S&D) for two-and-a-half enough support from the other political year terms. groups and whether the Member States can agree on him as the next Commission As outlined above, there may be a big President. It is still not clear to what extent political clash over the naming of the new the governments will take account of European Commission President: the the Parliament elections in making this Member States, who have the right of appointment. appointment, will make their choice known in the European Council meeting at the New MEP heavyweights end of June. However, the Parliament must also give its approval, and it may reject the The top German candidate for the CDU Council’s nomination at its vote in mid-July (EPP group), David McAllister, is the if it believes that its own considerations MEP with the strongest backing of any (and perhaps its own top candidate, Jean- candidate and the personal support of Claude Juncker) have been overlooked. Angela Merkel. He will certainly gain a top Watch this space. position in the new Parliament and has a good chance of being elected the new cONTENTS 28 Member States (Please click to view each country) 3 AUSTRIA 2014 2009 EP Party Domestic Party 2009 2014 S&D Sozialdemokratische Partei 5 5 Österreichs G/EFA Die Grüne Alternative 2 3 ALDE NEOS - Das neue Österreich 0 1 EPP Österreichische Volkspartei 6 5 NI Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs 2 4 AUSTRIA NI Demokratie, Kontrolle, 3 0 Gerechtigkeit Only winners, no losers? Chancellor Faymann’s Social Democrats SPÖ (S&D group) has won 23.8 % of the votes, which is just fractionally more than in the last European election. There was moderate relief among SPÖ followers, as they managed to close the gap between themselves and their coalition partner ÖVP. As the other governing party, the centre-right ÖVP (EPP group) has lost 2.7% but regardless still regards itself as the winner of the election as it has maintained its number one position. Veteran MEP Othmar Karas, who tops the ÖVP list, has been tipped as a candidate to become Austria’s next European Commissioner. However the real winners of the Austrian election are the FPÖ (non-attached) and the Greens. The nationalistic FPÖ, which openly campaigned against foreigners, has won 20% of the votes, which means an increase of 8%. In many communes they are now the leading force. The Greens have surprisingly increased their share from 9.9% to more than 13% which they celebrated as a huge success. NEOS, Austria’s new liberal party only founded in 2012, has reached 7.9% but are not satisfied with the result, as polls had seen them above 10%. 4 Belgium 2014 2009 EP Group Domestic Party 2009 2014 S&D sp.a / PS 5 4 G/EFA Groen! / Ecolo 3 2 ALDE OpenVLD / MR 5 6 EPP CD&V / Cdh / 5 4 CSP BELGIUM ECR NVA 1 4 NI Vlaams Belang 2 1 Fall of extreme-right; rise of the Flemish nationalists Traditionally, the turnout for European elections in Belgium is high for two reasons: firstly, voting is mandatory in Belgium and secondly, they occur on the same day as the national and regional elections. There was no difference in this statistic this time around, as 91% of the population showed up to cast their vote on 25 May. Inevitably this means that national politics largely influenced the outcome of the European elections in Belgium. The big winners in Belgium are Flemish nationalists (NVA), with a programme of liberal social-economic reforms, as well as the pursuit of an independent Flanders. NVA becomes the country’s largest political party and has increased its presence in the European Parliament from one to four seats. This victory comes at the expense of the ‘traditional’ political parties: the Flemish Christian Democrats have lost one seat, down from three to two, and the Flemish socialists have also lost, down from two to one. The status quo was maintained for the Flemish Liberals of Guy Verhofstadt, who have retained their three seats, as well as for the Flemish Greens, who keep their one.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poland (Mainly) Chooses Stability and Continuity: the October 2011 Polish Parliamentary Election
    Poland (mainly) chooses stability and continuity: The October 2011 Polish parliamentary election Aleks Szczerbiak [email protected] University of Sussex SEI Working Paper No. 129 1 The Sussex European Institute publishes Working Papers (ISSN 1350-4649) to make research results, accounts of work-in-progress and background information available to those concerned with contemporary European issues. The Institute does not express opinions of its own; the views expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. The Sussex European Institute, founded in Autumn 1992, is a research and graduate teaching centre of the University of Sussex, specialising in studies of contemporary Europe, particularly in the social sciences and contemporary history. The SEI has a developing research programme which defines Europe broadly and seeks to draw on the contributions of a range of disciplines to the understanding of contemporary Europe. The SEI draws on the expertise of many faculty members from the University, as well as on those of its own staff and visiting fellows. In addition, the SEI provides one-year MA courses in Contemporary European Studies and European Politics and opportunities for MPhil and DPhil research degrees. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/ First published in March 2012 by the Sussex European Institute University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RG Tel: 01273 678578 Fax: 01273 678571 E-mail: [email protected] © Sussex European Institute Ordering Details The price of this Working Paper is £5.00 plus postage and packing. Orders should be sent to the Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RG.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia's Righteous Among the Nations
    Slovakia’s Righteous among the Nations Gila Fatran Slovak-Jewish relations, an important factor in the rescue of Jews during the Holocaust, were influenced in no small part by events that took place in the latter third of the 19th century. That century saw the national awakening of oppressed nations. The Slovak nation, ruled by the Hungarians for 1,000 years, was struggling at the time for its national existence. The creation of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy led in 1867 to the granting of equal civil rights to the Jews in the empire in the assumption that they would assimilate nationally and culturally into the state. At the same time the Hungarian leaders stepped up their suppression of the Slovak nation. The integration of the Jews into the developing economic and cultural life and the continued improvement in their situation alongside the suppression of the aspirations of the Slovaks, were used by the political and church representatives of the Slovak nation to fan the flames of Jew-hatred and to blame the Jews for the difficult lot of the Slovak People. During this period many Slovak publications also addressed the existence of a “Jewish Question” in a negative sense: blaming the Jews for all of the Slovak society’s ills. During this era, one of the central reasons behind the rise of Slovak antisemitism was the economic factor. At the same time, the slogan “Svoj k svojmu,” which, freely translated, means “Buy only from your own people,” registered a series of “successes” in neighboring countries. However, when nationalists, using this motto, launched a campaign to persuade Slovaks to boycott Jewish-owned shops, their efforts proved unsuccessful.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Czech Republic Date of Election: 25th and 26th October 2013 Prepared by: Lukáš Linek Date of Preparation: 23rd February 2016 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [X] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [X] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Party of Citizens Rights-Zemannites (SPO-Z).
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • 2018 Aims and Scope
    VOLUME 1 • NUMBER 1 • 2018 Aims and Scope Critical Romani Studies is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, providing a forum for activist-scholars to critically examine racial oppressions, different forms of exclusion, inequalities, and human rights abuses Editors of Roma. Without compromising academic standards of evidence collection and analysis, the Journal seeks to create a platform to critically engage with Maria Bogdan academic knowledge production, and generate critical academic and policy Central European University knowledge targeting – amongst others – scholars, activists, and policy-makers. Jekatyerina Dunajeva Pázmány Péter Catholic University Scholarly expertise is a tool, rather than the end, for critical analysis of social phenomena affecting Roma, contributing to the fight for social justice. The Journal Tímea Junghaus especially welcomes the cross-fertilization of Romani studies with the fields of European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture critical race studies, gender and sexuality studies, critical policy studies, diaspora studies, colonial studies, postcolonial studies, and studies of decolonization. Angéla Kóczé Central European University The Journal actively solicits papers from critically-minded young Romani Iulius Rostas (editor-in-chief) scholars who have historically experienced significant barriers in engaging Central European University with academic knowledge production. The Journal considers only previously unpublished manuscripts which present original, high-quality research. The Márton Rövid (managing editor) Journal is committed to the principle of open access, so articles are available free Central European University of charge. All published articles undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial Marek Szilvasi (review editor) editorial screening and refereeing by at least two anonymous scholars. The Journal Open Society Foundations provides a modest but fair remuneration for authors, editors, and reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: a Comparative
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The Australian National University 1 Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online This is a pre-print for: R. Ackland and R. Gibson (2013), “Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), special issue on Computational Social Science: Research Strategies, Design & Methods, 231-244. Dr. Robert Ackland, Research Fellow at the Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia *Professor Rachel Gibson, Professor of Politics, Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. *Corresponding author: Professor Rachel Gibson Institute for Social Change University of Manchester, Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK Ph: + 44 (0)161 306 6933 Fax: +44 (0) 161 275 0793 [email protected] Word count: 6,062(excl title page and key words) 2 Abstract This paper analyses hyperlink data from over 100 political parties in six countries to show how political actors are using links to engage in a new form of ‘networked communication’ to promote themselves to an online audience. We specify three types of networked communication - identity reinforcement, force multiplication and opponent dismissal - and hypothesise variance in their performance based on key party variables of size and ideological outlook. We test our hypotheses using an original comparative hyperlink dataset. The findings support expectations that hyperlinks are being used for networked communication by parties, with identity reinforcement and force multiplication being more common than opponent dismissal. The results are important in demonstrating the wider communicative significance of hyperlinks, in addition to their structural properties as linkage devices for websites.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups
    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism, Voters and Cleavages in Bulgarian Politics*
    56 POLITOLOGICKÝ ČASOPIS / CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 1/2017 Populism, Voters and Cleavages in Bulgarian Politics* EMILIA ZANKINA** Abstract The growing success of populist parties from across the political spectrum in Europe calls for an examination of the link between populist parties and voters and the new (if new indeed) cleavages that such parties exploit. Scholars have pointed to the erosion of traditional cleavages as one rea- son for the success of populist parties. Such analysis fits well with the established democracies of Europe but has little application in the East European context. Traditional cleavages have taken root in few places in Eastern Europe before communist takeover and became even less relevant follow- ing four and a half decades of communist rule. With the fall of communist regimes across Eastern Europe, the only meaningful division within society was that of anti-communists and supporters of the old regime. Similarly, concepts of Left and Right had (and to a great extend continue to have) lit- tle relevance in the East European context where the Left came to be dominated by former commu- nist parties and the Right engulfed an ideologically incoherent opposition. The stronger the former communists were (such as in Bulgaria and Romania) the more fragmented the Right was, as it was the only available space for political competition. The present paper aims to examine voter support for populist parties in Bulgaria and analyze on the cleavages that those parties exploit or create. Thus, the paper examines the impact of populist parties on the political landscape in terms of the changes that those parties result in in voter behavior and cleavage formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: the Czech Senate
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments Factsheet: The Czech Senate Wallenstein Palace, seat of the Czech Senate 1. At a glance The Czech Republic is a parliamentary democracy. The Czech Parliament (Parlament České republiky) is made up of two Chambers, both directly elected – the Chamber of Deputies (Poslanecká sněmovna) and the Senate (Senát). The 81 senators in the Senate are elected for six years. Every other year one third of them are elected which makes the Senate a permanent institution that cannot be dissolved and continuously performs its work. Elections to the Senate are held by secret ballot based on universal, equal suffrage, pursuant to the principles of the majority system. Unlike the Lower Chamber, a candidate for the Senate does not need to be on a political party's ticket. Senators, like MPs have the right to take part in election of judges of the Constitutional Court, and may propose new laws. However, the Senate does not get to vote on the country budget and does not supervise the executive directly. The Senate can delay a proposed law, which was approved by the Chamber. However this veto can, with some rare exceptions, be overridden by an absolute majority of the Chamber in a repeated vote. 2. Composition Composition of Senate following the elections of 2-3 October & 9-10 October 2020 Party EP affiliation Seats Občanská demokratická strana (ODS) Civic Democratic Party 27 TOP 09 Starostové a nezávislí (STAN) Mayors and Independents 24 (some MEPs) Křesťanská a demokratická unie - Československá strana lidová (KDU-ČSL) 12 Christian-Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People's Party ANO 2011 Česká strana sociálně demokratická (ČSSD) 9 Czech Social Democratic Party Senátor 21 Senator 21 Česká pirátská strana 7 Czech Pirate Party (some MEPs) Strana zelených Green Party Non-attached 2 TOTAL 81 The next elections must take place in autumn 2022 at the latest.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport D'activite |2014
    RAPPORT D’ACTIVITE | 2014 1. Introduction et chiffres clés d’Ecofolio en 2014 Le 8e exercice social d’Ecofolio atteste d’un changement de modèle. Le déchet est devenu une ressource pour tous. La mission de l’éco-organisme est bien de récolter ces mines urbaines que constituent les contenants de collecte sélective pour faire des vieux papiers la matière première compétitive des industries de demain. La dynamique n’est plus la même : auparavant le déchet coûtait, polluait et ne trouvait pas de débouchés. Nos vieux papiers sont désormais des ressources alternatives au bois qui se raréfie, et des vecteurs de croissance et d’emplois pour demain. L’économie circulaire est la seule réponse à la raréfaction des ressources et à la nécessaire sobriété carbone de nos économies. Elle est une promesse de croissance nouvelle et pérenne qui réconcilie l’amélioration écologique et la création de valeur. Ecofolio doit agir avec toutes les parties prenantes pour amorcer ce cercle vertueux de la croissance verte et transformer l’éco-contribution acquittée par les metteurs sur le marché en investissement pour des usines, des emplois et de la qualité écologique. L’année 2014 a permis à Ecofolio de déployer pleinement les actions prévues à son 2e agrément : davantage de soutiens pour soutenir majoritairement le recyclage, mais aussi de nouveaux financements pour accompagner la rationalisation de la collecte et du tri des vieux papiers (dispositif d’accompagnement au changement), des actions renforcées en matière de communication/information et sensibilisation toujours conduites comme des campagnes de cause et non de marque. Et toujours des actions majeures en termes de R&D et d’études pour améliorer la recyclabilité des produits en papier et les performances de la collecte et du tri.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Times /Behaviour & Attitudes European Elections May 2014
    Sunday Times /Behaviour & Attitudes European Elections May 2014 Opinion Poll 3rd – 15th May, 2014 Prepared for Prepared by Ian McShane J.5607 Technical Appendix 2 Technical Appendix ● The results of this opinion poll are based upon a representative sample of 1,545 eligible Irish voters aged 18 years +. ● A separate questionnaire was produced for each of three regions to take the three separate European Election constituencies into account. The number of interviews upon which the representative samples of eligible voters in each constituency is based is as follows: Dublin Constituency 521 Midlands-North-West 513 South Constituency 511 ● As such, the results for each constituency can be deemed to be accurate to within plus or minus 4.5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. ● Fieldwork was conducted over the period 3rd – 14th May, 2014 with interviewing carried out at the Behaviour & Attitudes Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) Unit at Milltown House in Dublin. ● Interviewing was conducted across all electoral constituencies in the country with households selected for interview by way of Random Digit Dialling (RDD). ● The sample is split across RDD landline numbers and RDD mobile telephone numbers, so as to ensure that individuals living in landline only households, mobile only households, and households with both a landline and mobile telephone are represented in their correct proportions. 3 Technical Appendix ● The subsequent survey results are weighted to reflect the known demographic profile of Irish adults, utilising the most recently published census population estimates from the Central Statistics Office (CSO). ● All aspects of the survey, including the Party Support adjustment factor, are implemented in accordance with the technical and ethical guidelines set down by the Association of Irish Market Research Organisations (AIMRO) and the European Society of Opinion & Market Research (ESOMAR).
    [Show full text]
  • There Has Been No Bulgarian Tradition of Any Long-Standing Resistance to the Communist Regime
    There has been no Bulgarian tradition of any long-standing resistance to the communist regime. There was neither any political opposition, nor any other kind of an influential dissident movement. Bulgaria never went through the purgatory of the Hungarian uprising of 1956, or the “Prague spring” of 1968. It is indeed difficult to find any counter arguments whatsoever against the cliché that Bul- garia was the closest satellite of the Soviet Union. The fundamental contradictions within the Union of Democratic Forces (SDS) coalition were present from the very first day of its inception. There were Marxists who were longing for “socialism with a human face”, intellectuals with liberal ideas, social democrats and Christian democrats, conservatives and radical demo- crats, monarchists and republicans. The members of the center-right coalition did not delude themselves about their differences; they rather shared the clear un- derstanding that only a painful compromise could stand some chances against the Goliath of the totalitarian Bulgarian Communist Party (BKP). It was this unani- mous opposition to the communist regime and its legacy that made the coalition possible. But only for a limited period of time. The United Democratic Forces (ODS) government under Prime Minister Ivan Kostov (1997-2001) completed the reformist agenda of anti-communism. At the end of the ODS term of office, Bulgaria was a country with a functioning market economy, stable democracy, and a clearly outlined foreign policy course towards the country’s accession to the European Union and NATO, which was accepted by all significant political formations, the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) included.
    [Show full text]
  • Declining Support for Government of Donald Tusk and for Civic Platform (Po)
    DECLINING SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT OF DONALD TUSK AND FOR CIVIC PLATFORM (PO) The coalition of Civic Platform and Polish Peasant Party (PO-PSL), which has governed Poland for over four years, is losing social support. Evaluations of the government of Donald Tusk have deteriorated. At present, they are the worst, if both parliamentary terms are considered. The decline was precipitated by, among others, problems with implementation of new rules on refunding medicines, signing of the ACTA agreement (a decision from which the government eventually withdrew), and planned changes in the pension system, especially raising the retirement age to 67 years. From Dec. 2011 to March 2012 the proportion of government supporters fell from 44% to 31%, while the number of opponents rose from 31% to 45%. ATTITUDE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF DONALD TUSK “Don't know” omitted The popularity of the Prime Minster is diminishing. The proportion of respondents satisfied with the work of Donald Tusk as Prime Minister fell from 49% in Dec. 2011 to 33% in March 2012. At the same time, the number of the dissatisfied rose from 38% to 57%. SATISFACTION WITH DONALD TUSK AS PRIME MINISTER “Don't know” omitted The effects of government's activities are perceived ever more critically. The proportion of people satisfied with them fell in the last four months from 45% to 25%, while the number of the dissatisfied rose from 40% to 67%. EVALUATION OF EFFECTS OF ACTIVITY OF DONALD TUSK'S GOVERNMENT UP TO DATE “Don't know” omitted The decline in support for the government is accompanied by a drop in the ratings of the Civic Platform (PO).
    [Show full text]