<<

EMEA Credit Comment 18 March 2019

European : Deutsche / merger impact on debtholders

 A merger between and Commerzbank would be at best neutral for debtholders Israel Da Costa, CFA in the short to medium term, although potentially positive in the long term. Credit Analyst +44 20 7597 8355  The hurdles for an actual merger are still significant, meaning execution of the deal is still far [email protected] from clear.

Comment The merger talks between Deutsche Bank (DB) and Commerzbank (CBK) are finally official, as announced by both parties yesterday afternoon. We see the merger as neutral, at best, for debtholders in the short to medium term, although potentially positive in the long term. The structure of the deal remains open and speculative, but we see significant execution risks and other factors that could weaken the merged entity’s credit profile, including:

 Unsolved problems. DB’s and CBK’s main current problem is the lack of revenue generation, with reductions in the cost base being matched by reductions in revenue. Both banks have seen declining revenues and have struggled to maintain a sustainable business model amid the new regulatory environment and low interest rates. Although there are potentially significant costs synergies to be achieved, it is unclear how the merger would lead to improved revenue generation. In fact, as SMEs and large corporates often have several banking product providers, those which are served by both DB and CBK, would seek alternative providers to maintain the diversification of their supply base.  Material charges. Restructuring charges will be significant. In addition to a large number of branch closures and layoffs, the integration of IT and risk systems will also lead to significant charges. In addition, in a deal where DB is the acquirer, and CBK the acquired, CBK’s assets would be revalued at market or fair value, as per the accounting rules of an acquisition. This could lead to significant devaluation of CBK’s assets (i.e. losses) which could eat into the merged bank’s capital base. Among the assets with significant potential for devaluation are the €8.4bn of Italian sovereign exposure held by CBK as of end-September 2018. Significant additional costs to DB would also arise if it were to pay a premium for CBK. The latter has a current market value of €9.5bn, which translates into a P/B of 0.32, meaning DB would have to raise at least around €3bn for a 30% premium on CBK’s share for instance.  Diminished profitability. Capital could be raised through the sale of DB’s asset management arm DWS, which has reportedly showed interest in, and/or the sale of CBK’s Polish operations. However, these two divisions are positive drivers of the banks’ profitability. At DB, the Asset Management division reported a pre-tax RoE of 7.8% in 2018, whilst the private and commercial banking division reported a 5.6% pre-tax RoE, and the CIB 1.2%. At CBK, the Polish operations reported a pre-tax RoE of 16.6%, materially above the 5.3% reported by the group as a whole.  Reduced focus on revenue generation. The merger would divert management attention from business and balance sheet optimization. In light of the new regulatory environment, low interest rates, and weakening economic growth, European banks are focused on optimizing business models and balance sheets, avidly looking for ways to increase earnings in a sustainable manner, with low capital consumption. Meanwhile, management of the merged group will be distracted by the many significant challenges of the merger, noting also that both banks have a poor track record on integration (e.g. Dresdner by CBK and Postbank by DB).  Not the right consolidation. Justifying the merger on the basis that the German banking sector needs consolidation is somewhat shallow. Although correct per se, the consolidation needed in is of the thousands of Sparkassen (savings banks) and Volksbanken (cooperative banks), which do not seek profit maximization and drag down margins. Consolidation of the two largest privately owned groups will have little impact, if any, on margins in Germany.  Higher capital buffers. The larger size of the merged entity could also lead to higher systemic buffer requirements. Although this would mean higher protection for senior debtholders, it would further restrict the merged entity’s capital utilization.

There are also positive credit factors that could arise from the merger, yet these are only likely to materialize in the long term:

 Government support. It is being reported that the German government would convert its 15.45% ownership of CBK into a stake of the merged entity, with these shares being transferred to the state-owned KFW, which, in turn, would act as anchor shareholder and could inject additional capital if required. This means that the implicit government support to DB’s bondholders would strengthen significantly. In addition, given the size of the merged entity and relevance for the German economy and financial sector, the German government could also easily circumvent the EU’s bail-out rules in a stressed scenario by -correctly- arguing that a default by the bank would destabilize the local financial system.  Renewed franchise. In an optimistic scenario, in which the merger and restructuring are executed successfully, we see a renewed and increased confidence from investors and clients in dealing with a government-supported “German champion”. DB’s franchise has been hit significantly since spring 2016, when it incurred a significant outflow of deposits and clients. The lender has since failed to recover many of the clients lost, whilst a continuous flood of negative headlines and disappointing earnings led the bank to become the sick man among the large European global trading banks. A new, merged group would allow for a fresh start on strengthening of the bank’s franchise.

European Banks: Deutsche Bank / Commerzbank merger EMEA 18 March 2019 impact on debtholders

 Ratings. DB’s Senior Non-Preferred (SNP) debt is rated Baa3/Negative by Moody’s and BBB-/Stable by S&P, whilst CBK is rated Baa1/Stable and BBB/Negative. That is, DB’s SNP debt currently has a high likelihood of a downgrade to sub- investment grade, which would increase the bank’s wholesale funding costs even more, further impacting profitability. The rating of the merged entity is naturally yet to be confirmed, with the rating agencies yet to publish a view on the matter, but with CBK’s 1-2 notches higher than DB’s, the merged entity could end up with a higher rating for its bonds, including the SNP.

It remains highly uncertain whether the deal will indeed go ahead. German unions and key shareholders are reportedly against the deal, whilst the likely high number of job cuts would put pressure on the government. In all, we would need to see the details of the merger to better assess the impact on bondholders. At the moment, based purely on credit metrics, we see significant negative pressure. Nonetheless, debtholders were initially positive on the news this morning, driven partly by the potentially strengthened government support, with spreads on DB senior bonds tightening up to 20bps, whilst CBK’s spreads widened marginally.

Key Metrics Pro-Rata DB/CBK Data as of YE18 Deutsche Bank Commerzbank BNP Paribas merged Total Assets €1,384bn €462bn €1,846bn £1,113bn €2,040bn Total Deposits €565bn €228bn €793bn £395bn €797bn CET1 Capital €52bn €23bn €75bn €41bn €76bn CET 1 Ratio 13.6% 12.9% 13.3% 13.2% 11.8% LR Ratio1 4.1% 4.8% 4.2% 5.1%3 4.5% Wholesale Funding €133bn €67bn €200bn £154bn €159bn Net Income €267m €865m €1,132m £1,394m €7,526m RoE 0.4% 3.1% 1.2% 2.7% 8.2% FTE in Germany 41,700 36,400 78,100 - - Branches in Germany 1,400 1,000 2,400 - - Moody’s SP/SNP2 rating A3/Baa3 Negative A1/Baa1 Stable - A2/Baa3 Stable Aa3/Baa1 Stable S&P SP/SNP2 rating BBB+/BBB- Stable A-/BBB Negative - A/BBB Stable A/A- Positive Source: Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Bloomberg. 1CBK data used for pro-rata calculation as of end-3Q18 2OpCo/HolCo ratings for Barclays. 3UK Leverage Ratio.

Please note the disclaimers and disclosures on the last page of this document. - 2 -

European Banks: Deutsche Bank / Commerzbank merger EMEA 18 March 2019 impact on debtholders

Key contacts

London Head of Research Grant Lewis +44 20 7597 8334 Financials, Supras/Sovereigns & Agencies Israel Da Costa, CFA +44 20 7597 8355

Research Assistant Manager Jodene Adjei +44 20 7597 8332

Tokyo Domestic Credit Chief Credit Analyst Toshiyasu Ohashi +81 3 5555 8753 Electronics, Automobiles, Non-Banks, Real Estate, REIT Takao Matsuzaka +81 3 5555 8763 Chemicals, Iron & Steel Kazuaki Fujita +81 3 5555 8765

International Credit Non-Japanese/Samurai, European Sovereigns Hiroaki Fujioka +81 3 5555 8761 Non-Japanese/Samurai Fumio Taki +81 3 5555 8787 Non-Japanese Jiang Jiang +81 3 5555 8755

London Translation Head of Translation, Economic and Credit Mariko Humphris +44 20 7597 8327

DAIR

All of the research published by the London and New York research teams is available on our Bloomberg page at DAIR . If you are unable to access the research on this page, please contact Jodene Adjei on +44 207 597 8332.

Access our research at: http://www.uk.daiwacm.com/ficc-research/research-reports Follow us

www.twitter.com/@DaiwaEurope

This document is produced by Daiwa Securities Co. Ltd and/or its affiliates and is distributed by Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited in the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited is authorised and regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority, is a member of the and an exchange participant of Eurex. Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited and its affiliates may, from time to time, to the extent permitted by law, participate or invest in, or be mandated in respect of, other transactions with the issuer(s) referred to herein, perform services for or solicit business from such issuer(s), and/or have a position or effect transactions in a particular issuer’s securities or options thereof and/or may have acted as an underwriter during the past twelve months in respect of a particular issuer of its securities. In addition, employees of Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited and its affiliates may have positions and effect transactions in such securities or options and may serve as Directors of a particular issuer. Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited may, to the extent permitted by applicable UK law and other applicable law or regulation, effect transactions in securities of a particular issuer before this material is published to recipients.

This publication is intended for investors who are not Retail Clients in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Rules of the FCA and should not therefore be distributed to such Retail Clients in the United Kingdom. Should you enter into investment business with Daiwa Capital Markets Europe’s affiliates outside the United Kingdom, we are obliged to advise that the protection afforded by the United Kingdom regulatory system may not apply; in particular, the benefits of the Compensation Scheme may not be available.

Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited is part of Daiwa Securities Group Inc. Daiwa Securities Group Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates, or its or their respective directors, officers and employees from time to time have trades as principals, or have positions in, or have other interests in the securities of the company under research including market making activities, derivatives in respect of such securities or may have also performed and other services for the issuer of such securities. Daiwa Securities Group Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates do and seek to do business with the company(s) covered in this research report. Therefore, investors should be aware that a conflict of interest may exist.

Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Limited has in place organisational arrangements for the prevention and avoidance of conflicts of interest. Our conflict management policy is available at http://www.uk.daiwacm.com/about-us/corporate-governance-regulatory. Regulatory disclosures of investment banking relationships are available at http://www.us.daiwacm.com/.

The statements in the preceding paragraphs are made as of March 2019.

Please note the disclaimers and disclosures on the last page of this document. - 3 -