Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 141 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1995 No. 194 House of Representatives The House met at 11 a.m. and was Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- nation of Federal reporting require- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- nal stands approved. ments'' with an amendment. pore [Mr. SHAW]. Mr. GUTKNECHT. Mr. Speaker, pur- The message also announced that f suant to clause 1, rule I, I demand a pursuant to Public Law 99±83, the vote on agreeing to the Speaker's ap- Chair, on behalf of the President pro DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER proval of the Journal. tempore, appoints Rabbi Chaskel PRO TEMPORE The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Besser, of New York, E. William The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- question is on the Chair's approval of Crotty, of Florida, and Ned Bandler, of fore the House the following commu- the Journal. New York, to the Commission for the nication from the Speaker: The question was taken; and the Preservation of America's Heritage WASHINGTON, DC, Speaker pro tempore announced that Abroad. December 7, 1995. the ayes appeared to have it. f I hereby designate the Honorable E. CLAY Mr. GUTKNECHT. Mr. Speaker, I ob- ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER SHAW, JR., to act as Speaker pro tempore on ject to the vote on the ground that a PRO TEMPORE this day. quorum is not present and make the NEWT GINGRICH, point of order that a quorum is not The Chair will entertain twenty 1- Speaker of the House of Representatives. present. minute speeches on each side. f The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- f PRAYER ant to clause 5, rule I, further proceed- WELCOME TO BISHOP DWIGHT ings on this question are postponed. Bishop Dwight Pate, Church Point PATE The point of no quorum is considered Ministries, Baton Rouge, LA, offered withdrawn. (Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana asked and the following prayer: was given permission to address the f God the Father and Creator of man- House for 1 minute and to revise and kind, on this seventh day of December, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE extend his remarks.) nineteen hundred and ninety-fifth year The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the Mr. FIELDS of Louisiana. Mr. Speak- of our Lord, we come with thanks- gentleman from Georgia [Mr. LINDER] er, I rise this morning to introduce to giving in our heart, and a mouth full of come forward and lead the House in the the House and to the American people praise for You allowing us another day Pledge of Allegiance. a man who has had a great impact on to carry out Your appointments on this Mr. LINDER led the Pledge of Alle- many lives through his good work, his Earth. giance as follows: teaching, and his message of good will. We acknowledge here in this great Bishop Dwight Pate is from my home I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the House that every good and perfect gift United States of America, and to the Repub- of Baton Rouge, LA, where he leads comes from the Father of light. Grant lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Church Point Ministries, a large unto us knowledge and wisdom to indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. church of over 4,000 members, as well judge ourselves. Grant unto us the un- f as an academy where teaching prepares derstanding to govern our daily affairs. and inspires many people who have lost Touch our hearts to be true laborers MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE their way to live meaningful and good together for the cause of uniting the A message from the Senate by Mr. lives. Homeless people, those addicted Nation. Because where there is unity Lundegran, one of its clerks, an- to drugs, and all who have lost their there is strength. Let Your counsel of nounced that the Senate had passed way in our society can find the path to freedom flow like rivers of anointed oil with an amendment a bill of the House healing through Bishop Pate's min- for where Your spirit is there is always of the following title: istry. Bishop Pate's hard work has liberty. Amen, amen. H.R. 660. An act to amend the Fair Housing built an institution that is invaluable f Act to modify the exemption from certain to his community, and his teaching has familial status discrimination prohibitions healed and inspired. His ministry THE JOURNAL granted to housing for older persons. brings his community together for wor- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The message also announced that the ship and dedication to make their lives Chair has examined the Journal of the Senate agrees to the amendment of the better. last day's proceedings and announces House to the bill (S. 790) ``An Act to His work is the work that helps make to the House his approval thereof. provide for the modification or elimi- America great. I want to thank Bishop b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H 14175 H 14176 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE December 7, 1995 Pate for his great service and welcome poena and also states the committee I applaud the committee for finally him to the U.S. Congress. shall not countermand or interfere taking the step of moving to instill f with the outside counsel's ability to more confidence in their deliberations. take steps necessary to conduct a full I do believe, however, that they must IT IS TIME TO DEBATE THE REAL and fair investigation. give the outside counsel the latitude to ISSUES AND STOP ENGAGING IN We cannot have a double standard, put to rest all the issues that have POLEMICS and that is all we ask for, Mr. Speaker. been raised. To do something other (Mr. WALKER asked and was given f than that is to do different than we did permission to address the House for 1 when Speaker Wright was in the com- minute.) WE SHOULD WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE THE NATION'S PROBLEMS mittee's deliberations, and would be, I Mr. WALKER. Mr. Speaker, for much think, unfortunately a truncated ap- of this year this House has reverber- (Mr. BOEHNER asked and was given proach to getting this Congress beyond ated with speeches condemning fellow permission to address the House for 1 the cult of personality and back to Members of Congress and other fellow minute and to revise and extend his re- work. figures. Many of those speeches have marks.) f bordered on hate. Some people on my Mr. BOEHNER. Mr. Speaker, for side of the aisle have used language more than 13 months there has been an ETHICS PROCESS BEING ABUSED against the President that has been in- orchestrated campaign to demonize the FOR POLITICAL GAIN appropriate. On the minority side of Speaker. I think that this campaign (Mr. DELAY asked and was given per- the aisle, the speeches against the that has gone on to try to destroy him mission to address the House for 1 Speaker have been filled with venom. is unfortunate. Of the 65 specific alle- minute and to revise and extend his re- The fact is that we are going to have gations that were made in the com- marks.) political differences over issues and plaints to the Committee on Ethics Mr. DELAY. Mr. Speaker, to compare policies. We should debate vigorously about the Speaker, all were technically the Wright investigation to the Ging- those matters. But in the citadel of de- dismissed or fully dismissed except rich investigation is like comparing a mocracy there should be much more ci- one. gnat to a hippopotamus. Of that one, there has been a special vility than we have seen this year. Last night, the Ethics Committee Those of you who wanted the Com- investigator brought in to work with unanimously dismissed 64 of 65 allega- mittee on Ethics to report on the the subcommittee to look at that one tions against Speaker NEWT GINGRICH. Speaker, they have. Can we now stop narrow little charge, which a former Both Republicans and Democrats con- the personal vilification? Can the lead- IRS commissioner has already sug- cluded that most of these charges were ership on both sides of the aisle begin gested to both the Speaker and others unwarranted, unnecessary, and not policing our own ranks to stop Mem- is no violation whatsoever. bers from using the House floor to Mr. Speaker, I think all of us have an worthy of further investigation. The 65th charge is narrowly focused vilify each other or express personal obligation to ourselves and an obliga- hatreds? tion to this institution to be honest on a technical tax law that requires an Many of us, myself included, have en- and to be forthright and to make sure outside expert to investigate. And even gaged in polemics on this floor. If what that the integrity of the institution is this charge has been found to be base- I have said in the past has been offen- maintained. The politicization of the less by a former commissioner of the sive to someone, then I intend to lower Committee on Ethics over this last Internal Revenue Service. my voice and stick to debating the real year I think is unfortunate, because Let there be no mistake.
Recommended publications
  • The Honorable Rick Santorum
    The Honorable Rick Santorum Former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1990 at the age of 32, and from 1995 to 2007, served in the US Senate. In 2000, he was elected by his peers to the position of Senate Republican Conference Chairman. Senator Santorum became one of the most successful government reformers in our history, taking on Washington's powerful special interests from the moment he arrived in our nation's Capitol. Along with John Boehner and Jim Nussle, Senator Santorum was a member of the famous "Gang of Seven" that exposed the Con - gressional Banking and Congressional Post Office scandals. It was this record of reform that prompted a Washington Post reporter to write in a recent article that "Santorum was a tea party kind of guy before there was a tea party." He was also an author and floor manager of the landmark Welfare Reform Act which passed in 1996 that has empowered millions of Americans to leave the welfare rolls and enter the workforce. Senator Santorum wrote and championed legislation that outlawed the heinous procedure known as Partial Birth Abortion as well as the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act," the "Unborn Victims of Violence Act," and the "Combating Autism Act" because he believes each and every individual has value and the most vulnerable in our society need to be protected. Senator Santorum fought to maintain fiscal sanity in Washington before it was in fashion, fighting for a balanced budget and a line item veto. He bravely proposed reforming entitlements, cutting spending and even developed a "spendometer" that added up the cost of Democrat amendments to spending bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Course: a Congressional Management Guide
    SETTING COURSE SETTING “The best thing a new Member and his or her staff can do is to sit down and read Setting Course cover to cover. It’s a book that has stood the test of time.” —House Chief of Staff SETTING “Setting Course is written as if you were having a conversation with someone who has been on Capitol Hill for 50 years and knows how things work.” —Senate Office Manager COURSE SETTING COURSE, now in its 17th edition for the 117th Congress, is a comprehensive guide to managing a congressional office. Part I is for Members-elect and freshman offices, focusing on the tasks that are most critical to a successful transition to Congress and setting up a new office. Part II focuses on defining the Member’s role — in the office and in Congress. Part III provides guidance to both freshman and veteran Members and staff on managing office operations. Setting Course is the signature publication of the Congressional Management Foundation MANAGEMENT GUIDE CONGRESSIONAL A and has been funded by grants from: Deborah Szekely A CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT GUIDE THE CONGRESSIONAL MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION (CMF) is a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan nonprofit whose mission is to build EDITION FOR THE trust and effectiveness in Congress. We do this by enhancing the 117th performance of the institution, legislators and their staffs through CONGRESS research-based education and training, and by strengthening the CONGRESS bridge between Congress and the People it serves. Since 1977 CMF 117th has worked internally with Member, committee, leadership, and institutional offices in the House and Senate to identify and disseminate best practices for management, workplace environment, SPONSORED BY communications, and constituent services.
    [Show full text]
  • Rick Santorum: Why He Lost Pennsylvania & What It Means
    Rick Santorum: Why he Lost Pennsylvania & What it Means February 14, 2012 G. Terry Madonna & Michael L. Young Why did he lose so badly? And what does it mean now? These two inextricably linked questions—why Rick Santorum lost his Pennsylvania Senate seat so decisively in 2006 and what it means for his presidential campaign in 2012—are increasingly being asked within Republican Party circles. In a party now obsessed with “electability,” Santorum’s own un-electability just six years ago in a key Electoral College state looms an urgent question. Indeed, it emerges as perhaps the central issue in Santorum’s still unlikely quest for the GOP nomination. Why Santorum lost so lopsidedly in 2006 may be the easier to explain. Santorum’s political persona is a study in timing. He has always ridden the political waves. First elected amidst a tumultuous flood of national change in the early 1990’s, he was defeated during a subsequent one 12 years later. On the way up, he personified the rising conservative movement; on the way down, he became the national symbol of discontent with Republican rule. Electorally, Santorum has always been a shooting star. First elected to the House from a Democratic district in western Pennsylvania, he quickly gained notice as a member of the “Gang of Seven,” helping to expose the House bank scandal and working closely with Newt Gingrich. Four years later, he ran for the Senate. As usual his timing was superb, catapulting into office in the huge Republican tide of that year. He quickly moved up the leadership ladder.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 141 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 1995 No. 1 House of Representatives are too many lobbyists, too many law- show that the House of Representatives is RULES OF THE HOUSE yers and too many special interests not for sale, I urge you to say no to gifts, say (Continued) with too much influence. They are no to personal gain in the people's House, and support the gift ban. b 1700 angry because they see Members tak- ing money and gifts from well-con- Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 nected insiders and, in some cases, try- minute to the distinguished gentleman minute to the distinguished gentle- ing to use their offices to amass per- from Texas [Mr. GENE GREEN]. woman from Georgia [Ms. MCKINNEY]. sonal wealth. (Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas asked Ms. MCKINNEY. Mr. Speaker, I sup- This is supposed to be the day when and was given permission to revise and port many of the important rules we address the rules Members live by, extend his remarks.) changes being presented here today. yet in the entire Republican rules But, Mr. Speaker, it seems strange to Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas. Mr. package we are considering today there me that the first opportunity that the Speaker, we will soon be voting to is not a single amendment that ad- Republicans get, they start doing what change the way the House operates in dresses any of these issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Rick Santorum: "I Was Basically Pro-Choice All My Life, Until I Ran For
    Rick Santorum: "I Was Basically Pro-Choice All My Life, Until I Ran for... http://www.phillymag.com/scripts/print/article.php?asset_idx=340098 Print Now | Email Article | Close Rick Santorum: "I Was Basically Pro-Choice All My Life, Until I Ran for Congress" In a 1995 Philadelphia magazine feature, the 2012 presidential candidate was depicted as a Newt Gingrich acolyte, a Congressional bully, a class clown … and someone who changed his mind about abortion because of “science and religion.” By Eric Konigsberg IN THE SUMMER OF 1989 , Rick Santorum and a fellow associate at the Pittsburgh law firm of Kirkpatrick and Lockhart left work to drive to Three Rivers Stadium for the firm's annual softball game. Sitting behind the wheel, Santorum popped in a tape, and on came the reedy voice of a man lecturing as if to a classroom. “Listen,” Santorum said. “Newt Gingrich.” “Who the hell is Newt Gingrich?” the co-worker asked. Santorum explained that Gingrich was a congressman from Georgia, and that he was the guy to listen to if you were considering a future in politics. “At the time,” says the co-worker, “I had no idea that was something Rick was interested in.” As it turned out, Santorum was already telling people he was running for Congress in the upcoming election. The tape was something he had ordered from GOPAC, Gingrich's political action committee, full of do-it-yourself campaign tips for aspiring candidates. In recent years, of course, Gingrich's tutelage of Santorum has taken on a much more direct nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Sue Ansel President & Chief Executive Officer Gables Residential
    Sue Ansel President & Chief Executive Officer Gables Residential Sue Ansel is President and Chief Executive Officer. In her 25 plus years with Gables, she has held positions in acquisitions, development, and operations and has led important company initiatives including the advancement of real estate technology efforts and third-party client services. Sue serves on several boards and committee’s including serving as an officer and on the Executive Committee of the National Multi-Housing Council, and officer of The Real Estate Council and The Real Estate Council Foundation Board of Directors, The Dallas Summer Musical Board of Directors and DePauw University’s Board of Trustees. Sue is also a member of the Urban Land Institute and a graduate of DePauw University. Douglas M. Bibby President National Multifamily Housing Council Douglas M. Bibby is President of the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), a national organization of 1,000 member firms involved in the multifamily housing industry. Under his leadership NMHC represents the industry on Capitol Hill and before the regulatory agencies, promotes research and the exchange of information, and advocates for rental housing across a broad spectrum of issues. In his 12th year as head of the Council, Bibby has been honored by the publication Multi-Housing News as one of the most influential leaders in the industry through its “Dozen who make a Difference” award in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. Prior to joining NMHC, Bibby spent 16 years as a senior officer of Fannie Mae, where he served on the company’s Management Committee throughout his tenure. He was part of the top management team that is credited with the remarkable turnaround at Fannie Mae in the book Good to Great.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Wednesday, March 11, 1992 the House Met at 2 P.M
    4986 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE March 11, 1992 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Wednesday, March 11, 1992 The House met at 2 p.m. S. 792. An act to reauthorize the Indoor charity. We are talking about our na­ The Chaplain, Reverend James David Radon Abatement Act of 1988 and for other tional interest. We are talking about Ford, D.D., offered the following pray­ purposes. putting America first. er: Let us pray, using the words of Psalm SUPPORT FOR ECONOMIC AND 106: DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT IN CONGRATULATING THE TEXAS Praise the Lord! 0 give thanks to the THE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS TECH UNIVERSITY LADY RAIDER Lord, for he is good; for his steadfast love BASKETBALL TEAM ON THEIR (Mr. BERMAN asked and was given endures for ever! FIRST SOUTHWEST CONFERENCE permission to address the House for 1 CHAMPIONSHIP Who can utter the mighty doings of the minute and to revise and extend his re­ Lord, or show forth all his praise? marks.) (Mr. COMBEST asked and was given Blessed are they who observe justice, Mr. BERMAN. Mr. Speaker, the ad­ permission to address the House for 1 who do righteousness at all times! ministration's lack of response to criti­ minute and to revise and extend his re­ Amen. cal needs in the former Soviet Union marks.) constitutes nothing less than criminal Mr. COMBEST. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to congratulate the Texas Tech THE JOURNAL neglect of the United States' foreign policy and national security objectives. University women's basketball pro­ The SPEAKER. The Chair has exam­ It also ignores the fact that the secu­ gram on their Southwest Conference ined the Journal of the last day's pro­ rity, heal th, and prosperity of our championship.
    [Show full text]
  • Schweiker Tom Ridge Republican Nominee for Governor
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Page 1 of 79 10108/1992 83 :2~ This703323834~ document is from the collections at theKARL Dole GALLANT Archives, University of Kansas PAGE El2 http://dolearchives.ku.edu TO 70332~345 1994. 10-07 H:EMORAND'C'M TO : Lcf.\.l.:c:·le Simrnone FROM: Charles G. Kopp DA.Ti: October 7, l~~4 RF.: De1P. Event Cha~lee G. Kopp, Oo-Chairman WOLF , H~OCK 1 SCHORR and SOLIS•COHEN 1r;th and ~eetnut Strcote 12~0 Paokard Bldg. ihil&., fA 19l02 :215/~77-:2158 Dr. Pa~l :!3~cko?:r, : Pre•id.ent T~O~ JEFFERSON UNIVEKS1T¥ 641 Scott St~eet P~ila., PA 19107 215/,$$•6617 Daniel 'J. Keating, II! / :s>residenc K~At!NO SUI~DING ¢0RPORATlON Ct"l~ 'Ral a A.venue .B .;i.la Cynwyd 1 :PA 1~004 315/ 668·4100 Michael 1<arp 1 Pr••id~nt ATX TJ:;LJECO!rl.MUNICATIO?t.S SS~VIC!:S 5 a Mon1,1,."l\ent Road i~la ~~d, P~ 19004 ~15/3!6-4,00 Manny seamataki•, Freside:•t CAPITAL MA.NAGEMEN't' ENTEJRP~. I~EA 1111 w. De~alb ii~e Wf.yne, PA l~Oe7 21S/2S5-9600 Eoh Ash•~, Praaident ASHER'$ CHO~OLAtES 14$ x~y•e~~- Drivo M~ntgomerYv"ille, ~A l8936 .215/628··4420 Page 2 of 79 PAGE El4 KARL GALLAMT 18108/1532 ~3;2G 7El3323834GThis document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu FROM I TO 7~3::!:1;,o .:i .
    [Show full text]
  • ABC News Iowa Republican Debate Dec
    Full Transcript: ABC News Iowa Republican Debate Dec. 11, 2011— go.com The following is a full transcript of the ABC News Iowa Republican debate, with Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich, anchored by ABC News' Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos. DIANE SAWYER: And a good evening to all of you welcome to Iowa, welcome to Drake University as the presidential voting draws near, the time is coming. And the political team of ABC News has been out in force throughout this state. And we just wanna say to the people of Iowa, we are endlessly struck by how seriously you take your role as first in line for the vote. GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Every four years first. DIANE SAWYER: That is true. And it's 24 days now and counting until the voting begins in the caucuses. And-- and it's at the time for closing arguments, so let us introduce the presidential candidates from the Republican party for the United States of America here at the debate tonight. Former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, Governor Rick Perry of Texas, former Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts (AUDIENCE WHOOP), former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich of Georgia (AUDIENCE WHOOP), Texas Congressman Ron Paul, (APPLAUSE) and Congresswoman from Minnesota, Michele Bachmann. (APPLAUSE) Thank you all. Before we begin if we can just one note, because George and I have been talking and all of us have been talking to many of you about what it takes to run for the presidency in this country right now.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolution That Wasn't: Conservatives Against Congress
    The Revolution That Wasn’t: Conservatives Against Congress, 1981-2018 Philip A. Wallach CSAS Working Paper 20-22 First Branch, Second Thoughts — What Is Congress’s Proper Role in the Administrative State? The Revolution That Wasn’t: Conservatives Against Congress, 1981-2018 Philip A. Wallach Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute Working Paper prepared for the Research Roundtable, “First Branch, Second Thoughts” convened by the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, Antonin Scalia Law School, September 2020. Thanks to participants in the March roundtable for excellent comments. Why didn’t conservatives have more success overhauling the administrative state or cutting back the scope of the federal government after the Republican Revolution of 1994? In part, they simply lacked the votes. Less obviously, forty years in the minority in the House of Representatives left Republicans with a deeply hostile view of Congress as an institution, making it difficult for them to envision the legislature as an effective counterweight to the president or administrative state. Even as Congress became conservatives’ power center, they mostly remained presidentialists. This paper provides a detailed account of the reforms conservatives sought, especially in the 104th Congress of 1995-1996, in order to show how conservative antipathy toward Congress helped ensure the durability of the administrative state. *** I. Introduction In November 2019, Attorney General William Barr delivered a keynote speech to the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention, the message of which was that “over the past several decades, we have seen steady encroachment on Presidential authority by the other branches of government.”1 In Barr’s telling, Congress had “largely abdicated its core function of legislating” and turned instead to “constant harassment” of the executive branch, “plainly designed to incapacitate” it.
    [Show full text]
  • October '10 Newsletter.Pub
    g{xg{xg{x Elephant’s Ear iÉÄâÅx FA aÉA DC bvàÉuxÜ ÁDC October 28, 2010 GCRWC FUNDRAISER LUNCHEON Mark your calendars and bring your friends! Richard John "Rick" Santorum is a former United States Senator from the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, and will be joining us for a special fundraising lunch (only $20) at the Carolina First Center on October 28th . Senator Santorum is well-known on the national political scene as a key ally to social conservative causes, and political speculators mentioned him as a poten- tial presidential candidate in 2008 and potentially in 2012. Senator Santorum is often touted as the exception in Pennsylvania politics because he was a staunch conservative in an otherwise moderate state (note: he served at the same time as party-switcher Arlen Specter). He successfully maneuvered murky political waters, and we look forward to hear- ing how Republicans can reclaim Congress and the White House and succeed in key swing states like Pennsylvania. Although Senator Santorum is no longer in public office, he is still engaged in the national political scene. He is a contributor on the Fox News Channel and a Senior Fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C. Bringing a national perspective, Senator Santorum plans to fo- cus on the creation of jobs and reviving the economy. We look forward to hearing how the national party can articulate a winning and successful message, and turn the economy from its current direc- tion. Thanks to the hard work of our program chair, Pamela Sowell, our club is fortunate enough to have a national speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bipartisan Women of the Us Senate
    THE BIPARTISAN WOMEN OF THE U.S. SENATE: CIVILITY, COLLABORATION AND STEWARDSHIP OF THE UPPER CHAMBER A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Liberal Studies by Shannon M. Kula, M.P.S. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. 24 March 2016 COPYRIGHT 2016 Shannon M. Kula ii THE BIPARTISAN WOMEN OF THE U.S. SENATE: CIVILITY, COLLABORATION AND STEWARDSHIP OF THE UPPER CHAMBER Shannon M. Kula, M.P.S. DLS Chair: Elizabeth Duke, PhD ABSTRACT The United States Senate has long been called one of the world’s “greatest deliberative bodies” yet today, many Americans see a bitterly divided and ideologically polarized Congress. The American public rightfully demands to understand why limited bipartisanship, as well as significant stalemate and obstructionism, persist in hindering legislative work on Capitol Hill. What is urgently needed is an inclusive polity and healthy public institutions that ensure the success of the American democracy. Indeed, a vital resource is found in the values and actions of the bipartisan women of the U.S. Senate who represent a small, yet impactful, twenty percent of the legislative body. The examination of the bipartisan women of the Senate is a critical analysis of successful behaviors and belief systems in need of replication for productive governance within the legislative branch. How the women of the Senate work with each other and with their colleagues to be successful in a traditionally male dominated institution and in a political environment that currently makes large and small legislative accomplishments a challenge will be explored at length.
    [Show full text]