DOCSLIB.ORG

European Union Funding to Civil Society in Azerbaijan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Union Funding to Civil Society in Azerbaijan EuropeAid European Union Funding to Civil Society in Azerbaijan EUROPEAN 2012 COMMISSION Geographic Distribution of project activities funded by the European Union through the 2010 EIDHR and NSA Instruments (valid 2012-2014) Welcome Salam, It is my great pleasure to present the 17 new EU- supported civil society projects starting in Azerbaijan in 2012. They cover a wide range of areas, from creating opportunities for disabled children or the blind, to providing independent media coverage, supporting the activities of civil rights campaigners, or raising awareness on the need to protect the environment. The combined EU contribution to these projects is €2.6 million. This is in addition to the over €4.7 million that the EU has already provided in Azerbaijan since 2007. through consultations on a regular basis at the This makes the EU the largest foreign donor to level of the EU Delegation in Baku, but also at the civil society in Azerbaijan, something that we are regional level, at venues such as the Civil Society proud of. Forum of the Eastern Partnership. Most immediately, this funding is about providing Having said this, any financial support comes with assistance. An active and engaged civil society is a responsibility to ensure that EU funds are well the most effective vector to address and resolve spent, in full transparency and accountability. key issues in innovative, practical and effective Interventions must have the widest possible ways. impact in areas relevant to the Azerbaijani population. In a longer term perspective, however, our funding is about partnership. True, effective This is a goal we have worked hard to achieve with systemic change is only achieved via close these 17 new projects, and I invite you to look cooperation between government and a through this publication to not only find out more legitimate, independent and vivid civil society, about the projects we are financing, but also how which raises key issues, proposes ideas and we selected them, what we are trying to achieve, actively monitors and reports on progress. The and how you can work with us. long term vision of EU support to civil society is to In 2012 we are planning to continue our support, promoting civil society as exactly such a partner. and to expand it even further with the launch of The belief of this partnership is clearly reflected in new calls for proposals and new initiatives that EU relations with the Government of Azerbaijan, will benefit even more of the Azerbaijani where cooperation with civil society forms a basis population. of all the cooperation frameworks that the Government of Azerbaijan has committed to, We look forward to working with you on these from the Partnership and Cooperation current and on future efforts. Agreement signed in 1999 to the Eastern Partnership, in 2009. Roland Kobia EU Ambassador to the Of course, EU cooperation with Azerbaijani civil Republic of Azerbaijan society goes beyond just providing funding. Civil Society is an invaluable partner for us, either 3 The EU and Civil Society Information sessions for the 2010 EIDHR and NSA Calls for Proposals in Lenkoran, November 2010 Understanding EU Funding for Civil Society How does the EU support civil society actions in Azerbaijan? The EU provides grant funding for project page 6) and the Non-State Actors in Development proposals which will be implemented by local and Instrument (see page 17). In addition, Azerbaijan European non-state actors. is often eligible for Global Thematic Instruments The scope of EU funding is defined by EU financial (see page 26). instruments, which have a thematic or geographic All the instruments use Calls for Proposals as a focus, with annual themes. The two main transparent and competitive selection procedure instruments in Azerbaijan are the European to ensure that the best projects are selected for Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (see funding. How does the EU ensure that its funding is relevant and effective? Themes for EU Calls for Proposals are consulted During selection, priority is given to proposals with local civil society and other relevant with activities in the regions to ensure geographic stakeholders to ensure they respond to local coverage in the country. needs. All projects must include training or support EU Calls for Proposals require that either the activities for other civil society organisations, to applicant or partner is a local organisation to ensure awider impact . ensure that local organisations are involved in all All projects must also aim to influence legislation EU funded projects. and develop cooperation with the Government to havea long term effect . 4 The EU and Civil Society How does a EU Call for Proposals Work? 1 Preparation ? What is PADOR? The EU developsGuidelines , which set out themes, PADOR is an online EU database to which available funding, eligibility criteria and the selection all civil society applicants must register to procedure. Guidelines are consulted with Civil be eligible for EU funding. Society to ensure they are relevant, and are www.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/work/ published online (EU Delegation website, EuropeAid onlineservices/pador website). If the Call is only relevant to Azerbaijan then it is advertised locally and information sessions ? How are projects rated? are organised in Baku and the regions. Each concept note or full application is rated by two separate evaluators (one 2 Evaluation external from the EU) according to Applicants have around 30 days to submit a four page scoring grids outlined in theGuidelines of concept note of their proposed project. These the call. concept notes are evaluated, and the best applicants An evaluation committee reviews the are invited to submitfull proposals , for which they two scores, and if they are not consistent have 30 days to prepare (in some cases applicants with each other then a third evaluator must submit the concept note and full proposals may be asked to make an additional together). Full proposals are assessed again, and the grading of the concept note/full best projects selected for funding. proposal. Concept Notes and Full Proposals are 3 Contracting ranked according to an average of the Final eligibility checks are undertaken to confirm scores of the evaluators. that the applicant can receive funding from the EU. If all is correct,contracts are signed with the selected ? Where can I find out more? applicants. After all contracts are signed, the results For information on all ongoing Calls for of the call are made public. Project activities start Proposals and details on EU procedures after contract signature. please visit the EuropeAid website at: www.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/work A Two Way Street Azerbaijani Civil Society Helping the EU Civil Society Organisations are not only Civil society also plays a key role in the Eastern implementing partners of EU funds, but also Partnership, where a Civil Society Forum enjoy an increasing responsibility in the comprised of organisations from all six Eastern programming and monitoring of EU assistance Partnership countries gives input on the and policy making. implementation of the partnership. Azerbaijan is For example, during its political dialogue with the represented by 26 local organisations, which act Government of Azerbaijan in areas such as on a rotating basis. migration, trade, economic development or You can find out more about the role of civil human rights, the EU regularly consults with local society and the Civil Society Forum at: civil society. In addition, all EU visiting high level www.eeas.europa.eu/eastern/civil_society officials meet with civil society to gain a balanced perspective on events in Azerbaijan. 5 Instruments Media monitoring activities as part of a 2009 EIDHR project implemented by the Institute for Reporters' Freedom and Safety. For 22 months specially trained experts monitored 8 TV channels and reported weekly on the amount of time allocated to various political subjects in Azerbaijan. The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) About the Instrument One of the two main EU instruments for civil framework of the Communities policy on societyinAzerbaijanistheEuropean development cooperation, and economic, Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights financial and technical cooperation with third (EIDHR.) Established in 2007 on the request of countries, and consistent with the EU’s the European Parliament, its main purpose is foreign policy as a whole” to: The EIDHR instrument is applied in all “contribute to the development and countries of the world outside the EU and the consolidation of democracy and the rule of most industrialised countries. law, and respect for all human rights and The average global annual budget for the fundamental freedoms, within the EIDHR Instrument is €160 million. 6 17 European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights EIDHR in Azerbaijan 2007-2010 Since 2007 three in-country calls for proposals have been held in Azerbaijan with the EIDHR instrument, with over €2.6 million allocated to 18 projects. These projects worked in areas such as: election monitoring; support to free media; assistance to €1.2m €0.7m €0.7m No call vulnerable groups such as internally displaced launched persons, disable children and victims of 2007 2008 2009 2010 trafficking in human beings; as well as empowerment of women in the regions. Year of EIDHR Call for Proposal EIDHR 2010 Call for Proposals The most recent Call for Proposals was launched in November 2010. To be eligible for funding, Overview of 2010 EIDHR projects proposals needed to act on one or more Selected Projects of the following themes: 1. Supporting civil society efforts to improve national legislation and its implementation 9 /79 selected in the field of democracy and human rights 2. Supporting human rights defenders involved 78% submitted by in the promotion of civil, political, social, local organisations economic and cultural rights 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ECONOMY of AZERBAIJAN 25 Years of Independence
    ECONOMY OF AZERBAIJAN 25 Years of Independence Prof. Dr. Osman Nuri Aras Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elchin Suleymanov Qafqaz University, Baku, Azerbaijan Assoc. Prof. Dr. Karim Mammadov Western University, Baku, Azerbaijan DESIGN Sahib Kazimov PRINTING AND BINDERING “Sharg-Garb” Publishing House A§iq aiesgar kiig., No: 17, Xatai rayonu, Baki, Azarbaycan; Tel: (+99412) 374 83 43 ISBN: 978-9952*468-57-1 © Prof. Dr. Osman Nuri Aras. Baki, 2016 © Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elchin Suleymanov. Baki. 2016 © Assoc. Prof. Dr. Karim Mammadov. Baki. 2016 Foreword During every work, whether it is academic or professional, we interact, get assistance and are guided by certain group of people who value and assist us to achieve our targets. We are sure that the people who support us and provide valuable contribution to the English version of this book will not be limited in a short list, but we would like to mention, and in certain ways, express our acknowledgement to the people who enabled us to get on a track and deliver the book in a few months. Thanks to Turan Agayeva, Ulker Gurbaneliyeva, Khayala Mahmudiu and especially to Tural Hasanov for their help in preparing and delivering this book to your valuable consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT AZERBAIJAN The Establishment of the Republic of Azerbaijan 28 May 1918 The independence Day 18 October 1991 Joining to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 30 January 1992 Joining to the United Nations 2 March 1992 Joining to the Commonweaith of independent States 19 September 1995 Joining to the Council of Europe 17 January2001 Area (thousand km^) 86.6 Population, (thousand person) (According to the beginning of 2015) 9593.0 Density of population in Ikm^(person) 111 Capital Baku Official Language Azerbaijan Currency Manat The course of Manat to Dollar (07.02.2016) 0.6389 The Head of State President ___ ________________________ ____ ______ ' .L-L; r - j = r .
    [Show full text]
  • Nagorno-Karabakh's
    Nagorno-Karabakh’s Gathering War Clouds Europe Report N°244 | 1 June 2017 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 149 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Ongoing Risks of War ....................................................................................................... 2 A. Military Tactics .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Potential Humanitarian Implications ....................................................................... 6 III. Shifts in Public Moods and Policies ................................................................................. 8 A. Azerbaijan’s Society ................................................................................................... 8 1. Popular pressure on the government ................................................................... 8 2. A tougher stance ................................................................................................... 10 B. Armenia’s Society ....................................................................................................... 12 1. Public mobilisation and anger
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Human Suffering in Conflict-Affected Areas A
    I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY USAID Strategic Objective 3.1: Reduced Human Suffering in Conflict-Affected Areas A. OVERVIEW This Final Report covers the entire 96 months, from January 15, 1998 to January 14, 2006, of the Azerbaijan Humanitarian Assistance Program (AHAP) managed by Mercy Corps and funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through an umbrella mechanism. The initial 24 months of programming under AHAP I (May 1998 through April 2000) provided health and nutrition services, shelter, economic opportunities, and information services. AHAP II programs (May 2000 through September 2005) addressed health, reproductive health, food, economic opportunities and social investment needs through community development and mobilization. During AHAP I, 16 programs operated throughout much of Azerbaijan, and during AHAP II the programming continued to reach much of the population in 23 regions in the country. In total, 18 subgrants operated in the four geographic areas of AHAP II: Southern area, Central area, Urban area and Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic (NAR). From May of 2000, AHAP provided assistance to 2,923,281 direct recipients, 1,551,100 (53%) of which are women. (See AHAP I and AHAP II sections for maps indicating geographic coverage and implementing partners.) AHAP I addressed issues related to the displacement of people because of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It provided mud brick shelters for IDPs to replace their deplorable living conditions in public buildings and makeshift dwellings; addressed water and sanitation issues; delivered primary health care, food and health education to over 300,000 IDPs; began working with people on ways to improve the economic situation including micro-credit, agriculture and business training, and providing agricultural inputs such as seeds and seedlings.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • Coi Chronology
    COI CHRONOLOGY Country of Origin ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN Main subject The course of the Nagorno-Karabakh armed conflict and its impact on the civilian population Date of completion 10 November 2020 Disclaimer This chronology note has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this chronology has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in this chronology does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and asylum decision-making authorities. The chronology was finalised on 10 November 2020 and will be updated according to the development of the situation in the region. COI CHRONOLOGY Background Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous landlocked region within the borders of Azerbaijan1 and is mainly inhabited by ethnic Armenians.2 Recognized under international law as a part of Azerbaijan,
    [Show full text]
  • BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2008
    BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2008 www.bp.com/caspian/2008sr BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2008 What’s inside? 03 Foreword by the president About this report of BP Azerbaijan Strategic The BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2008 covers Performance Unit (SPU) our business performance, environmental record and wider role in Azerbaijan during 2008. This is our sixth 04 Achievements and challenges Sustainability Report and reflects feedback we received 05 How BP operates about previous reports. • BP Azerbaijan SPU interests By ‘sustainability’ we mean the capacity to endure • BP in Azerbaijan at a glance as a commercial organisation by renewing assets and • Leadership team of by creating and delivering better products and services. BP Azerbaijan SPU We seek to meet the evolving energy needs of society, • History attract successive generations of employees and • BP in Azerbaijan in perspective 10 contribute to a sustainable environment. By doing so we aim to gain and retain the trust and support of our 10 Our operations customers, shareholders and the communities in which we operate. 15 Safe and reliable energy References in this report to ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’ • HSSE and compliance relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. management system Specific references to ‘BP’ and the ‘BP group’ mean • Safety 15 BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. • Environment Unless otherwise specified, the text does not • Health distinguish between the operations and activities of • Security and human rights BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates. 25 Human energy The earlier publications • Our people are available at • Compliance and ethics www.bp.com/caspian 30 Local energy • Dialogue and engagement Cover image • Revenue transparency Dive Support Vessel • Enterprise development (DSV) named after • Community programme 25 Academic Tofig Ismayilov • Environmental responsibility leaving the Central Azeri platform.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventieth Session Seventy-First Year Agenda Items 35 and 40
    United Nations A/70/1034–S/2016/767 General Assembly Distr.: General 8 September 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda items 35 and 40 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 6 September 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Upon instructions from my Government, I have the honour to convey herewith the records of the violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia in July 2016 (see annex).* During the period in question, Armenia violated the ceasefire regime 345 times and continued the usage of large-calibre guns and heavy weaponry from its positions in the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan and from its own territory. The continuous occupation of a large part of the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan by the armed forces of Armenia remains the main obstacle to the settlement of the conflict and the only source of the escalation of the situation on the front line and of occurrences of hostilities and casualties. The sooner the Republic of Armenia withdraws its troops from the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the sooner peace and stability can be restored in the region. I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 35 and 40, and of the Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization, State Militarization Through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 7-18-2014 Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Martirosyan, Anna, "Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia" (2014). Dissertations. 234. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/234 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan M.A., Political Science, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2008 M.A., Public Policy Administration, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2002 B.A., Teaching Foreign Languages, Vanadzor Teachers' Training Institute, Armenia, 1999 A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School at the University of Missouri - St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science July 11, 2014 Advisory Committee David Robertson, Ph.D. (Chair) Eduardo Silva, Ph.D. Jean-Germain Gros, Ph.D. Kenneth Thomas, Ph.D. Gerard Libardian, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and Its Alternatives
    Forced displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict: return and its alternatives August 2011 conciliation resources Place-names in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict are contested. Place-names within Nagorny Karabakh itself have been contested throughout the conflict. Place-names in the adjacent occupied territories have become increasingly contested over time in some, but not all (and not official), Armenian sources. Contributors have used their preferred terms without editorial restrictions. Variant spellings of the same name (e.g., Nagorny Karabakh vs Nagorno-Karabakh, Sumgait vs Sumqayit) have also been used in this publication according to authors’ preferences. Terminology used in the contributors’ biographies reflects their choices, not those of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. For the map at the end of the publication, Conciliation Resources has used the place-names current in 1988; where appropriate, alternative names are given in brackets in the text at first usage. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. Altered street sign in Shusha (known as Shushi to Armenians). Source: bbcrussian.com Contents Executive summary and introduction to the Karabakh Contact Group 5 The Contact Group papers 1 Return and its alternatives: international law, norms and practices, and dilemmas of ethnocratic power, implementation, justice and development 7 Gerard Toal 2 Return and its alternatives: perspectives
    [Show full text]
  • Country Tourism Product Facilitating Cross-Border Routes and Inter –Country Tourism Product
    Facilitating Cross-border Routes And Inter –Country Tourism Product Facilitating Cross-border Routes And Inter –Country Tourism Product A. Travel facilitation and connectivity I. visa regime II. connectivity B. Inter-country tourism products and initiatives I. tourism agreements II. inter-country tourism products C. Role of CAREC in promoting Inter-country tourism initiatives Azerbaijan Visa Regime General information for getting visa to Azerbaijan -Visa-free entry - E-visa ASAN visa - Visa at the Embassy - On arrival visa Connectivity with CAREC region Direct Land Maritime flights Aktau Kazakhstan Alma –Ata Astana Turkmenistan Georgia Kazakhstan Turkmenistan Ashgabad Georgia Tbilisi Uzbekistan Tashkent China Pekin Urmuchi EXISTING TOURISM AGREEMENTS WITH CAREC COUNTRIES » Agreement on cooperation in the field of tourism between Azerbaijan, and May 24 , 2005 May 22, 2007 April 23, 1997 September10, 2004 EXISTING TOURISM AGREEMENTS WITH CAREC COUNTRIES February 3, 1993 March 7, 1994 November 29, 2017 INTER-COUNTRY TOURISM PRODUCTS UNWTO Silk Road Program The Modern Silk Road INTER-COUNTRY TOURISM PRODUCTS Prehistoric Rock Art European Route of Historic Trails Thermal Towns (Gobustan, Azerbaijan) (Galalti , Azerbaijan) Certified Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe crossing Azerbaijan The European Route of The Iter Vites Route (Wine Road) Jewish Heritage (Goygol, Shamkir, Gabala) ( Guba, Krasnaya Sloboda) PLANNED INTER-COUNTRY TOURISM PRODUCTS “Cross –border » Asureti, Georgia » Goygol, Azerbaijan Thematic Route on the German Heritage”
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Republic of Azerbaijan
    COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (OMBUDSMAN) OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROVISION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN 2011 (SUMMARY) Baku – 2012 1 Foreword The main aim of the report is to evaluate the state of ensuring human and civil rights and freedoms in the country, to analyze the situation of important problems on human rights revealed in 2011, as well as to provide the information on activities conducted by the Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan for the restoration of violated human rights, protection of human rights and prevention of their infringement The report was prepared on the basis of appeals, petitions, proposals and complaints; different cases, problems and challenges disclosed during the visits of the Commissioner and staff members of the Institute to penitentiaries, investigatory isolators, temporary detention places, military units, orphanages, boarding schools, settlements of the refugees and IDPs, healthcare and social protection facilities, meetings with population in regions and investigations carried out there; official responses and attitudes of state agencies and authorities; proposals and recommendations submitted to state bodies; materials of national and international seminars and conferences dedicated to human rights; works implemented within the framework of the cooperation with non-governmental organizations; as well as of the information provided by the mass media. The report reflects the activities of the Commissioner in the area of the protection of human rights and freedoms, educational and awareness-raising events regarding the given sphere, the organization of scientific-analytical work, public relations, issues of international cooperation, as well as outcomes and recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • E718 March 1, 2003
    E718 March 1, 2003 REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN STATE AMELIORATION AND IRRIGATION COMMITTEE Public Disclosure Authorized Attached to the Cabinet of Ministers INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation FINAL DRAFT March 1, 2003 Public Disclosure Authorized 01/03/03 IRRIGATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Objective 1.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies 1.4 Methodology 1.5 Consultation Process 2. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, LEGAL & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 Policy Context 2.2 Legal/Regulatory Framework for Environmental Management/Assessment 2.3 Institutional Framework for Environmental Management and Assessment 3. KEY NATURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC PARAMETERS OF AZERBAIJAN 3.1 Natural Setting 3.2 Socio-Economic Factors Associated with Water Management and Irrigation 4. ANALYSIS OF BASELINE CONDITIONS 4.1 Description of Project 4.2 Analysis of Project Alternatives 4.3 Description of the Physical/Biological Environment 4.4 Description of Socio-Economic Context 4.5 Description of Stakeholders and Beneficiaries 5. ASSESSMENT OF PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND PROPOSED PREVENTIVE ACTIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 5.1 Anticipated Positive Social and Environmental Impacts 5.2 Anticipated
    [Show full text]