Understanding Tactile Paving at Pedestrian Crossings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Know Your Crossings INFORMATION SHEET Facts to Share Puffins, Zebras, Toucans, Pelicans and Equestrian Are All Different Types of Pedestrian Crossings
Know your crossings INFORMATION SHEET Facts to Share Puffins, zebras, toucans, pelicans and equestrian are all different types of pedestrian crossings. There are also traffic islands and school crossings where you may find a patrol officer who will help school children cross the road. Zebra crossing Puffin crossing The name zebra comes from the black and white stripes The name puffin comes from pedestrian on the road. They have: user friendly intelligence. • Flashing yellow beacons on black and white • Similar to pelican crossings but striped poles. instead of a green and red figure being on the other side of the road, they are next • Zig zag lines approaching the crossing. to you above the push button. • No traffic lights or ‘green figure’ to show when • They have motion detectors to know when someone is waiting to cross and Push button to cross. Wait for signal when they have reached the other side Safety tips of the road. • Because a zebra crossing does not have any traffic Toucan Push button lights or green figure, it is up to the pedestrian to Wait for signal look and listen all around for traffic, to make sure all The name toucan is based on the fact that the traffic has stopped and that it’s safe to cross. ‘two can cross’ - because these are joint pedestrian and cycle crossings. • Zebra crossings with an island in the middle should be treated as two separate crossings. • Similar to puffin crossings, a red and green cycle signal is given, as well as a red and green figure signal, as they allow both cyclists and pedestrians to cross. -
Thailand Letter and Annex
United Nations E/CN.17/2011/18 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 17 January 2011 Original: English Commission on Sustainable Development Nineteenth session 2-13 May 2011 Item 3 of the provisional agenda Thematic cluster for the implementation cycle 2010-2011 – policy session Letter dated 22 December 2010 from the Permanent Representative of Thailand to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to inform you that the Fifth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia was jointly organized by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MoNRE) of the Kingdom of Thailand, the Ministry of the Environment of the Government of Japan (MoEJ), the United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD) and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN- ESCAP), from 23 to 25 August 2010 in Bangkok, Thailand. The objectives of the Fifth Regional EST Forum were as follows: E/CN.17/2011/18 1. To contribute towards improving understanding and strengthening regional consensus in terms of sustainable policy options, and technological and institutional measures that promote sustainable and low-carbon transport. 2. To address and identify opportunities for collaborative actions and partnerships, including international financial mechanisms, for implementing affordable, economically viable, socially acceptable and environmentally sound transport systems in developing countries. 3. To illustrate innovative initiatives, achievements, and good practices for improving the public transportation system, increasing fuel efficiency, and greening freight transport. 4. To facilitate international cooperation for capacity - building activities, including wider- scale adoption and proliferation of various EST measures at the local and national levels. -
Improving Public Bus Service and Non-Motorised Transport in Bangkok
ASEAN - German Technical Cooperation | Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation in the Land Transport Sector Improving Public Bus Service and Non- Motorised Transport in Bangkok A Study for the Thailand Mobility NAMA October 2016 Disclaimer Findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this document are based on information gathered by GIZ and its consultants, partners and contributors. Acknowledgements GIZ does not, however, guarantee the accuracy We would like to thank Paul Williams, or completeness of information in this Dr. Kunchit Phiu-Nual, Stefan Bakker, document, and cannot be held responsible for Papondhanai Nanthachatchavankul, Tali Trigg any errors, omissions or losses which emerge and Farida Moawad for their valuable inputs from its use. and comments. Improving Public Bus Service and Non- Motorised Transport in Bangkok A Study for the Thailand Mobility NAMA Kerati Kijmanawat, Pat Karoonkornsakul (PSK Consultants Ltd.) The Project Context As presented to the ASEAN Land Transport The GIZ Programme on Cities, Environment Working group, TCC’s regional activities are in and Transport (CET) in ASEAN seeks to the area of fuel efficiency, strategy development, reduce emissions from transport and industry by green freight, and Nationally Appropriate providing co-benefits for local and global Mitigation Actions in the transport sector. At environmental protection. The CET Project the national level the project supports relevant ‘Energy Efficiency and Climate Change transport and environment government bodies Mitigation in the Land Transport Sector in the in the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia ASEAN region’ (Transport and Climate Change and Indonesia, for the development of national (TCC) www.TransportandClimateChange.org) action plans and improvement of policy aims in turn to develop strategies and action monitoring systems. -
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES for TEXAS December 2000 6
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-01/2136-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES FOR TEXAS December 2000 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Shawn M. Turner and Paul J. Carlson Product 2136-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-2136 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Product: Construction Division October 1999 - August 2000 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Research Project Title: Revising the Pedestrian Warrant for the Installation of a Traffic Signal 16. Abstract The purpose of this document is to recommend guidance and criteria on the provision of safe and effective pedestrian crossings. The guidelines should be useful to engineers and planners responsible for planning, designing, operating, and maintaining pedestrian facilities in Texas. The guidelines are intended to outline the numerous alternatives that are available to address pedestrian safety problems or public concerns at roadway -
Asian Est Initiative [Pdf 3423Kb]
Environmentally Sustainable 13-22 June 2012 Transport Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ASIAN EST INITIATIVE United Nations Ministry of the Environment Centre for Regional Development Government of Japan WHAT IS EST? Although there is no single, commonly held definition of Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST), the concept of EST is centred on the transportation systems and activities that meet social, economic, and environmental sustainability. EST offers an alternative to uncontrolled motorization and its related problems, comprising a complementary package of high quality public transport, non‐motorized transport (walking and cycling), transport demand management measures, clean fuels, transit oriented development, intelligent transport systems, and road safety programmes that will create a new paradigm for urban mobility and accessibility. While transportation is essential to meeting Asia's socioeconomic needs, balancing these needs with the need to protect the environment should be at the heart of the concept of EST. The Asian Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Initiative was jointly launched by United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD) and the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOEJ) in 2004 in close collaboration with national governments, international organizations, and bilateral and multilateral donor agencies. It aims to build a common understanding across Asia on the essential elements of EST and the need to adopt an integrated approach at the local and national levels to deal with multi‐sectoral environment and transport issues, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction. The twenty goals of the Bangkok 2020 Declaration (2010‐2020), agreed at the fifth Regional EST Forum in 2010, provide the basis for identifying, developing and implementing necessary policies, programmes and measures in realizing EST in Asian countries (www.uncrd.or.jp/env/5th‐ regional‐est‐forum/doc/bangkok_declaration.pdf). -
Bangkok Declaration for 2020
Final Version Bangkok Declaration for 2020 – Sustainable Transport Goals for 2010-2020 We, the participants, who are representatives of Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, People's Republic of China , Indonesia, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, the Philippines, Pakistan, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Viet Nam), international organizations, bilateral and multilateral agencies, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), research organizations, and expert sustainable transport professionals, having met at the Fifth Regional Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST) Forum in Asia, held in Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand, from 23 to 25 August 2010, to draft and adopt a declaration, the Bangkok 2020 Declaration, in order to demonstrate our renewed interest in, and commitment to, realizing a promising decade (2010-2020) of sustainable actions and measures for achieving safe, secure, quick, reliable, affordable, efficient and people-centric and environment friendly transport in rapidly urbanizing Asia, Noting the identification of transport as a theme under Agenda 21 on sustainable development and the outcome of the high-level meeting of the 9th session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-9) in 2001 which reached important decisions on transport sector issues concluding that improving transport systems to promote sustainable development, including improving accessibility, can foster economic and social development, help integrate developing -
National Cycle Manual
www.cyclemanual.ie The Basics Legislation and Policy Planning for the Bicycle Designing for the Bicycle Getting the Details Right Maintenance Tools and Checklists national Cycle Manual Cycling is for everyone The “cycling offer” within urban areas must be improved to encourage more people to cycle, including those who are risk-averse. The goal is now to “raise the bar” and to aim to provide for two-abreast cycling in a stress free and safe environment. the national Cycle Manual This Manual embraces the Principles of Sustainable Safety as this will offer a safe traffi c environment for all road users including cyclists. It offers guidance on integrating the bike in the design of urban areas. The Manual challenges planners and engineers to incorporate cycling within transport networks more proactively than before. I 5615_Introduction.indd 1 09/06/2011 13:30:10 June 2011 The National Transport Authority invites you to make use of the material in this manual as published, including the images and graphics. All material, unless otherwise acknowledged, is the property of the National Transport Authority, and any re-use should acknowledge the National Transport Authority. The material must not be edited or amended without the permission of the National Transport Authority. 5615_Introduction.indd 2 09/06/2011 13:30:10 CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 THE BASICS 1 1.1 Sustainable safety 3 1.1.1 Functionality 3 1.1.2 Homogeneity 4 1.1.3 Legibility 4 1.1.4 Forgivingness 5 1.1.5 Self-Awareness 5 1.2 Five needs of a Cyclist 6 1.2.1 Road Safety 6 1.2.2 Coherence 6 -
Universal Design in Urban Public Spaces for People with Disability
PLANNING MALAYSIA: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners VOLUME 16 ISSUE 1 (2018), Page 173 – 182 UNIVERSAL DESIGN IN URBAN PUBLIC SPACES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY. CASE STUDY OF TEHRAN, IRAN Elnaz Esfandfard1, Mohammad Hussaini Wahab2 & Rohayah Che Amat3 1,2,3UTM Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA Abstract Urban public spaces play important role in providing good quality of life to the people living in the city. This is in line with the social goal on sustainable development, which the purpose is to attain a higher social equity. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 15% of global population are disabled. During the eight-year war between Iran and Iraq, many of the victims in Iran were left disabled. The war left many people injured and this has significantly increased the impairment rate. Amongst the problems faced by people with disability in Tehran are difficulty traveling in the city, lack of public facilities and accessibility to particular facilities such as urban public spaces. This study first sought a definition of urban public spaces and Universal Design, and then finding solution for increasing interaction of people with disability in urban public spaces through Universal Design approach. This research was based on applied theory and qualitative method of field observation was engaged. One of the city district in Tehran was chosen for a case study. Based on the findings, urban design methods and solutions were suggested to increase the interaction and comfort of disabled people in urban public spaces. Keyword: universal design, urban public space, disabled people 1 PhD candidate at UTM Razak School, Kuala Lumpur. -
Pedestrian Safety Manual for Decision Makers and Practitioners
Pedestrian safety: Pedestrian a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners and decision-makers for manual safety a road Pedestrian World Health Organization safety 20 Avenue Appia 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.who.int/roadsafety/en/ A ROAD SAFETY MANUAL FOR DECISION-MAKERS AND PRACTITIONERS ISBN 978-92-4-150535-2 Pedestrian safety A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. 1.Accidents, Traffic – prevention and control. 2.Automobile driving. 3.Wounds and injuries – prevention and control. 4.Walking – injuries. 5.Safety. 6.Handbook. I.World Health Organization. II.FIA Foundation for the Automobile and Society. III.Global Road Safety Partnership. IV.World Bank. ISBN 978 92 4 150535 2 (NLM classification: WA 275) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. -
NCHRP Web-Only Document 91 (Project 3-71): Contractor’S Final Report – Appendices B to O
TCRP Web-Only Document 30 (Project D-8)/ NCHRP Web-Only Document 91 (Project 3-71): Contractor’s Final Report – Appendices B to O Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings Appendices B to O Prepared for: Transit Cooperative Research Program National Cooperative Highway Research Program Submitted by: Kay Fitzpatrick, Shawn Turner, Marcus Brewer, Paul Carlson, Brooke Ullman, Nada Trout, Eun Sug Park, Jeff Whitacre, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas and Nazir Lalani, Traffex Engineers, Inc., Ventura, California and Dominique Lord, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas March 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation (TDC) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). It was conducted through the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), which are administered by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academies. COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, or TDC endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. -
Dublin; Your City Our Citypdf
DUBLIN Your city / Our city A guide compiled by separated children 2 The artwork used in this publication is by young people involved in this project. Many thanks to Kitty Rogers and the Hugh Lane Gallery for facilitating this. Contents 3 An important definition......................4 Information on Ireland......................13 Section 1 Education..........................17 Section 2 Health & Wellbeing...........33 Section 3 Transport...........................43 Section 4 Leisure & Hangouts............61 Section 5 Religion & Spirituality......83 Section 6 Support Groups.................89 Section 7 Services Providers............103 Your Notes........................................119 An important definition Separated children Seeking aSylum / unaccompanied minorS Separated children are defined as children under the age of 18, who have been separated from both parents, or from their previous or customary primary caregiver. Some separated children /unaccompanied minors have refugee status and others have gone through the asylum process but have been refused asylum. Some young people do not fall into either category but are still referred to as unaccompanied minors/separated children. Source: www.separated-children-europe-programme.org About the Separated 6 1 Children Project This publication was produced by the separated children project run by the Ombudsman for Children’s Office. The project involved the participation of 35 separated children living in the Dublin area. Separated children are defined by the Separated Children in Europe Programme as “children under 18 years of age who are outside their country of origin and separated from both parents, or previous/ legal customary primary care giver”. The project ran from January 2009 to October 2009 and the young people worked on the project intensively during their summer holidays. -
Pedestrian Safety in Australia
Pedestrian Safety in Australia PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-RD-99-093 DECEMBER 1999 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-RD-99-093 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IN AUSTRALIA 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Peter Cairney 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) AARB Transport Research University of North Carolina Melbourne Highway Safety Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No. 730 Airport Rd, CB #3430 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430 DTFH61-92-C-00138 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Turner-Fairbanks Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike 14. Sponsoring Agency Code McLean, VA 22101-2296 15. Supplementary Notes Prime Contractor: University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center FHWA COTR: Carol Tan Esse 16. Abstract This report was one in a series of pedestrian safety synthesis reports prepared for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to document pedestrian safety in other countries. Reports are also available for: United Kingdom (FHWA-RD-99-089) Canada (FHWA-RD-99-090) Sweden (FHWA-RD-99-091) Netherlands (FHWA-RD-99-092) Australia is a federation of States and Territories, and government responsibilities broadly mirror that in the USA. Local government is responsible for 80 percent of the road network, though the less heavily traveled parts. Australia is highly urbanized (notwithstanding large tracts of sparsely populated land).