Focus Will Now Shift to Babri Demolition Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Focus Will Now Shift to Babri Demolition Case Eid-e-Milad processions called off in several cities ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ �������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��������� �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� FREE PRESS �������������������������� � ������ ��������� ����������������������� Building temple BJP's Focus will now poll pledge since 1991 ������������������������ NEW DELHI: The Ram temple issue has been a part of shift to Babri the BJP's election manifestos since the 1989 Lok Sabha polls. However, at that time, the BJP did not speak about constructing the temple at the disputed site. demolition case "By not allowing the rebuilding of the Ram Janma ����������������������������� Mandir in Ayodhya, on the lines of SomnathMandir built �������� known ''karsevaks'' under �������� all my countrymen in by the Government of India in 1948, it (government) has ������� Sections 395, 397, 332, 337, ��������� ���������������������������� wholeheartedly welcoming allowed tensions to rise, and gravely strained social har- 338, 295, 297, 153A of IPC, ���������������������������� the historic judgement de- mony," the BJP manifesto had said then. Now that the Supreme Court and Section 7 of the Crimi- BJP veteran LK Advani, livered by the five-member In the next elections in 1991, the saffron party said it has delivered its verdict in nal Law Amendment Act. the most prominent politi- ������������������������������� Constitution Bench of the firmly believed that construction of Ram Mandir at 'Jan- the much-awaited Ram Jan- Minutes later, a second FIR cal face of the Ram janmab- ������������� ����������������� Supreme Court today in the masthan' (birthplace) of Lord Ram was a symbol of the mabhoomi-Babri Masjid dis- no. 198/92 was registered un- hoomi movement, on Satur- Ayodhya matter," he said. vindication of "our cultural heritage and national self-re- pute case, the focus will shift der Sections 153A, 153B, 505 day said the historic ������������������� Struggling to find a space spect". In Dec 1992, Hindu mobs brought down Babri to the second Ayodhya case of the IPC against L.K. Ad- Supreme Court judgment at the outcome which the Underlining that the judg- in the country's politics Masjid and built a makeshift temple dedicated to Ram. pertaining to the Babri vani, Ashok Singhal, Giri- on the Ayodhya issue has verdict has made possible. ment is the culmination of dominated by secular par- In 1996, the year when the BJP first got power albeit Masjid demolition that took raj Kishore, MurliManohar vindicated his stand and he "I stand vindicated, and a long and contentious ties, the BJP under L K Ad- only for 13 days, the party manifesto promised to facili- place on December 6, 1992. Joshi, Uma Bharti, feels deeply blessed over feel deeply blessed, that the process over the last many vani hitched its bandwagon tate the construction of "a magnificent Shri Ram Mandir This case, related to the al- VinayKatiyar, Vishnu Hari- the verdict paving the way Supreme Court has given decades, Advani, who has to the temple cause in its in Ayodhya which will be a tribute to Bharat Mata".In leged criminal conspiracy Dalmiya and SadhviRita- for construction of a mag- its unanimous verdict been the BJP's longest serv- Palampur resolution in 1998, when the BJP finally formed its broad coalition gov- behind the demolition of the mbhara. This was related to nificent Ram temple. paving the way for the con- ing president, said, "Now 1989, giving a defining Hin- ernment, it repeated its promise to build "a magnificent mosque, is in the final stages provocative speeches pro- Describing it as a moment struction of a magnificent that the prolonged Mandir- dutva edge to its politics Shri Ram Mandir" where a makeshift temple exists. It of hearing in a Special CBI moting enmity delivered of "fulfilment" for him, Ad- temple for Lord Ram at Masjid dispute in Ayodhya which until then had lacked also said the BJP will explore all means towards this end. court in Lucknow. ahead of the demolition. vani, who celebrated his Ramjanmabhhomi in Ayod- has come to an end, the a popular cause celebre. In 1999, when the BJP returned to power, the party kept Some high-profile names Forty-seven other FIRs 92nd birthday on Friday, said hya," he said in a statement, time has come to leave all The issue combined with away from the temple issue, more to please many of its of Indian politics are the ac- were registered in cases re- "God Almighty" had given while "wholeheartedly" contention and acrimony its alliance with anti-Con- allies. However, in 2004, the BJP manifesto said: "The cused in the case, which has lated to offences of assault him an opportunity to make welcoming the judgement. behind and embrace com- gress parties in 1989 won the NDA believes an early resolution of the Ayodhya issue been going on for almost on mediapersons, looting his own humble contribu- Stressing that Ram and munal concord and peace." BJP 85 seats in Lok Sabha will strengthen national integration. We continue to hold three decades now. Some of valuables like cameras and tion to the mass movement Ramayana occupy an es- He appealed to all sections elections against mere two that the judiciary's verdict in this matter should be ac- the accused persons in the reporting gadgets etc. All and stressed that time has teemed place in India's cul- of India's diverse society to in 1984. Advani launched his cepted by all. At the same time, efforts should be intensi- case have already passed FIRs were filed at the Ram come to leave all contention tural and civilisational her- work together to strength- famous 'Rath Yatra' from fied for dialogue and a negotiated settlement in an at- away. The first FIR in this Janmabhoomi police sta- and acrimony behind and itage and Ram janmabhoo- en the country's national Somnath temple in Gujarat, mosphere of mutual trust and goodwill." case, related to the demoli- tion in Ayodhya. embrace communal concord mi (birthplace) holds a spe- unity and integrity. drawing people in their thou- In 2009, the BJP said there was an overwhelming desire tion of the Babri Mosque, A few days later, the gov- and peace. cial and sacred place in the Advani also welcomed the sands as his chariot rolled to have a grand temple and it again promised to explore was registered immediate ernment recommended the Terming the agitation for hearts of crores of country- SC's decision that five acres through the country's heart- possibilities to facilitate such a construction. It repeat- after it was brought down on demolition case no. 197 to the Ram temple the biggest men, he said it is gratifying of land be given at a promi- land rallying support for ed the promise in the 2014 and said it will "explore all December 6, 1992. CBI, while the second case since India's freedom move- that their belief and senti- nent place for building a building Ram temple at the possibilities within the Constitutional framework to fa- This first FIR no. 197/92 no. 198 was handed over to ment, he said it was aimed ments have been respected. mosque in Ayodhya. "I join disputed site in Ayodhya. cilitate construction of a Ram Temple in Ayodhya. was registered against un- the CB-CID branch of the UP police. A year later, however, the second case was also How UP cops curbed hate speech PV: Architect of modern India or PM who watched Babri was demolished? transferred to the CBI. NEW DELHI: A social media monitoring team in each of the 75 districts in the state, proactive measures to sanitise e may go down in history tinues till today. minister. Rao, who passed tral paramilitary forces to suc- WhatsApp and constant monitoring of certain groups as the prime minister who On Saturday, another day away in 2004, was accused cessfully take over the Babri helped Uttar Pradesh Police control the spread of hate Hput India on the path of lib- for the record books, the by several quarters of in- Mosque and the surrounding speech and misinformation on various social media plat- eralisation but P V Narasimha Rao Supreme Court delivered a action in the face of the area, ensuring its security, timing forms as the Supreme Court delivered the historic verdict will also always be remembered as historic verdict backing the gathering movement for and the element of surprise were in the Ayodhya title suit, a top state police officer said on the man under whose watch the construction of a Ram tem- the demolition of the of essence, he writes in his book Saturday. Babri Masjid was demolished, jolt- ple by a government-creat- mosque. Though his prime "The Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir The UP Police ensured well in advance that no WhatsApp ing the foundations of secularism ed trust at the disputed site ministerial tenure saw Dilemma: An Acid Test for India's groups in the communally-sensitive areas were able to post in the country. in Ayodhya and ruling that many landmark develop- Constitution". fake, mischievous or hate messages and disturb the law and The legacy of the late polyglot, an alternative five-acre plot must ments, the demolition is writ But Rao felt the contingency order situation, Ashutosh Pandey, Additional Director Gen- scholar and politician with a dif- be found for a mosque in the town. large on his legacy. According to plan was not workable and dis- eral (ADG), UP Police, and special in-charge of Ayodhya se- ference will forever be tainted by The spotlight returned to the key Madhav Godbole, who was home missed it, Godbole says in the curity, told IANS during an interaction. the demolition of the 16th century political players -- LK Advani, Uma secretary at the time, the MHA book. Former PM Manmohan mosque on December 6, 1992, when Bharti and MM Joshi for putting prepared a comprehensive con- Singh and ex-president Pranabda, he was prime minister.
Recommended publications
  • The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School May 2017 Modern Mythologies: The picE Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature Sucheta Kanjilal University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kanjilal, Sucheta, "Modern Mythologies: The pE ic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6875 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Mythologies: The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature by Sucheta Kanjilal A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Literature Department of English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gurleen Grewal, Ph.D. Gil Ben-Herut, Ph.D. Hunt Hawkins, Ph.D. Quynh Nhu Le, Ph.D. Date of Approval: May 4, 2017 Keywords: South Asian Literature, Epic, Gender, Hinduism Copyright © 2017, Sucheta Kanjilal DEDICATION To my mother: for pencils, erasers, and courage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I was growing up in New Delhi, India in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, my father was writing an English language rock-opera based on the Mahabharata called Jaya, which would be staged in 1997. An upper-middle-class Bengali Brahmin with an English-language based education, my father was as influenced by the mythological tales narrated to him by his grandmother as he was by the musicals of Broadway impressario Andrew Lloyd Webber.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayodhya Case Supreme Court Verdict
    Ayodhya Case Supreme Court Verdict Alimental Charley antagonising rearward. Conscientious Andrus scribbled his trifocal come-backs Mondays. Comedic or deific, Heath never rules any arracks! The ramayana epic were all manner, the important features specific domain iframes to monitor the realization of the request timeout or basic functions of supreme court ruling remain to worship in decision Mars rover ready for landing tomorrow: Know where to watch Pers. Xilinx deal shows AMD is a force in chip industry once more. He also dabbles in writing on current events and issues. Ramayan had given detailed information on how the raging sea was bridged for a huge army to cross into Lanka to free Sita. Various attempts were made at mediation, including while the Supreme Court was hearing the appeal, but none managed to bring all parties on board. Ram outside the Supreme Court. Woman and her kids drink urine. And that was overall the Muslim reaction to the Supreme Court verdict. Two FIRs filed in the case. Pilgrimage was tolerated, but the tax on pilgrims ensured that the temples did not receive much income. In either view of the matter, environment law cannot countenance the notion of an ex post facto clearance. While living in Paris, Maria developed a serious obsession with café culture, and went on to review coffee shops as an intern for Time Out. Do not have pension checks direct deposited into a bank account, if possible. Vauxhall image blurred in the background. The exercise of upgradation of NRC is not intended to be one of identification and determination of who are original inhabitants of the State of Assam.
    [Show full text]
  • SHARE a MESSAGE of LOVE #Pandoravalentines
    Leader in South Asian News - Tel: 905-795-0639 Friday, FebruaryJune 2, 2017 1, 2019 www.WeeklyVoice.com VolVol 25, 23, No. No. 05 22 PM: 40025701 SHARE A MESSAGE OF LOVE #PANDORAValentines THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE BRAMALEA CITY ERIN MILLS TOWN MAPLEVIEW SQUARE ONE CENTRE CENTRE CENTRE SHOPPING CENTRE 905.792.8820 905.828.5902 905.632.5400 905.232.0661 © 2019 Pandora Jewelry, LLC • All rights reserved A-2 | Friday, February 1, 2019 www.WeeklyVoice.com co-sponsored in part by Ninepoint Alternative Health Fund The first actively managed mutual fund in Canada focused on the cannabis sector. A mutual fund that takes advantage of changing dynamics in an early stage sector and aims to mitigate risk by diversifying across cannabis and neutraceutical sectors. Co-sponsored in part by Invest in the world’s fastest-growing major GATEWAY TO economy, with unique access to the entire spectrum of the Indian market, including NEW INDIA small and mid-cap equities, as well as Indian fixed-income. Ninepoint Partners is an independent investment manager committed to adding value to SUN LIFE EXCEL INDIA FUND investors’ portfolios through innovative thinking and real-world solutions. SUN LIFE EXCEL INDIA BALANCED FUND Learn more at www.ninepoint.com. InvestSUN LIFE EXC ELin NEW INDIA LEADERS FUND For more information, please call a Financial Advisor at: companies inventingWWW.SHAHFINANCIAL.CA WWW.SHAHFINANCIAL.CA NinepointNinepoint Partners Partners LP is is the the investment investment manager manager to the Ninepoint to the Ninepoint Funds (collectively, Funds (collectively, the ‘’Funds’’).
    [Show full text]
  • Concerned Citizens Tribunal - Gujarat 2002 an Inquiry Into the Carnage in Gujarat
    Concerned Citizens Tribunal - Gujarat 2002 An inquiry into the carnage in Gujarat Hate Speech The carnage in Gujarat was marked by unprecedented levels of hate speech and hate propaganda. Some examples: Chief Minister Narendra Modi Terming the (Godhra) attack as ‘pre-planned, violent act of terrorism’, Mr Modi said that state government was viewing this attack seriously. — The Times of India, Feb 28, 2002. "With the entire population of Gujarat very angry at what happened in Godhra much worse was expected". — Narendra Modi, at a Press Conference in Gujarat, Feb 28, 2002. Modi said he was ‘absolutely satisfied’ with the way in which the police and State Government handled the backlash from Godhra incident and ‘happy’ that violence was largely contained… "We should be happy that curfew has been imposed only at 26 places while there is anger and people are burning with revenge. Thanks to security arrangements we brought things under control".When asked that not a policeman was visible in most areas where shops were looted and set on fire, he said he hadn’t received any complaint. — The Indian Express, March 1, 2002. "Investigations have revealed that the firing by the Congressman played a pivotal role in inciting the mob." — CM Narendra Modi on Chamanpura incident where former MP Ahsan Jaffri was burned alive with 19 of his relatives. On being asked what could have lead to the Ex-MP opening fire it was ‘probably in his nature’ to do so. — The Hindustan Times, March 2, 2002. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Friday termed ‘barbaric’ the murder of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri along with 19 of his family members, but said there was firing from inside the house.
    [Show full text]
  • SLP Crl No. 2275 of 2011
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.751of 2017 (@Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.2275 of 2011) State (through) Central Bureau of Investigation …Appellant Versus Shri Kalyan Singh (former CM of UP) & Ors. …Respondents J U D G M E N T R.F. NARIMAN, J. Leave granted. 1. The present appeal arises out of the demolition of Babri Masjid. We are concerned in this case with two FIRs lodged on 6th December, 1992. The first viz. Crime No.197 of 1992, is against lakhs of kar sewaks alleging the offences of dacoity, robbery, causing of hurt, injuring/defiling places of public worship, promoting enmity between two groups on grounds of religion, etc. The IPC offences were, therefore, under Sections 153-A, 295, 297, 332, 337, 338, 395 and 397. The second FIR 1 viz. FIR No.198 of 1992 was lodged against eight persons named therein - Mr. L.K. Advani, Mr. Ashok Singhal, Mr. Vinay Katiar, Ms. Uma Bharati, Ms. Sadhvi Ritambara, Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi, Mr. Giriraj Kishore and Mr. Vishnu Hari Dalmia, two of whom are dead due to passage of time viz. Mr. Ashok Singhal and Mr. Giriraj Kishore. The FIR alleges offences under Sections 153-A, 153-B and Section 505 IPC. 46 further FIRs pertaining to cognizable offences and 1 FIR pertaining to non- cognizable offences were also lodged. Initially, a Special Court set up at Lalitpur was to try these cases but subsequently notifications were issued by the State Government, after consultation with the High Court, dated 8 th September, 1993 whereby these cases were to be tried by a Special Court at Lucknow.
    [Show full text]
  • “Freedom of Religion”, *Muskan Dhakad
    Volume 2, July 2018 ISSN 2581-5504 “Freedom of Religion” Muskan Dhakad B.B.A.LL.B Indore Institute of Law ABSTRACT Freedom of religion is in the Article (25-28) . It defines that the different religion have different culture. Religion is a matter of faith with individuals or communities. The state can have no religion of its own. They give equal treatment to the temple , church, and the mosque. The state is neutral treats all the religions equally. Religion is based on belief practise is to perform the religious beliefs , duties, rites, rituals and ideas prescribed by religious orders according their beliefs. Long time ago when only ruling on the everywhere Brahmins got the big place they got treatment at the above level . Religion is not defined in the constitution but it means that worship of rituals and beliefs. INTRODUCTION Freedom of religion article (25-28) . India is a secular state. State treats equally all religion. Religion has its own value in the Indians life. Freedom of religion means that different religions have their ways of worship and different spirituals and way of marriage in Hindus and Muslims. Hindus use Sanskrit language while worship in the temple. Muslims use Urdu language when they are reading Quran and Christian used to have read bible during the worship in the church. Every citizen of India have the freedom of adopting any religion according to their concern. Hindus who, when young, had from pressure become Musalmans, were allowed to go back to the faith of their fathers. No man should be interfered with on account of his religion, and every one should be allowed to change his religion, if he liked.
    [Show full text]
  • Exegesis of the Ayodhya Verdict
    EXEGESIS OF THE AYODHYA VERDICT OVERVIEW: The report throws light on the Supreme Court verdict released on November 9th 2019 with regards to the Ayodhya case and the intricate history revolving the case. The Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute or more commonly known as the Ayodhya case has been the most controversial court case of Independent India. It has been an emotive issue and has been mired in a slew of legal suites for over 70 years. The entire dispute is about 2.77 acres of land, which is approximately the size of two football fields. And yet, this land dispute has continued from the Mughal-era to a British rule to 2019, until, the legal conclusion on the case was announced by the Supreme Court on 9th November 2019, marking an end to decades of uncertainty on the issue. What value do this 2.77 acres hold for the people of India that turned this case into one of the most sensitive and controversial cases in India? What could be the influence of the verdict on this case and to what extent could it affect the common man? To be able to answer such questions, we need to understand the labyrinthine events that triggered this dispute. HISTORY: A. TEMPLE DEMOLISHMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF MOSQUE • The Hindu epic Ramayana states that the Hindu deity Lord Ram was born almost 900,000 years ago during the Treta Yuga in Ayodhya on the banks of the river Sarayu. This is identified with present-day Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh. According to the beliefs of the Hindus, the ancient temple which stood in place of the demolished Babri mosque marked the exact birthplace of Lord Ram.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Index of Adjudications in Complaints Regarding Threats to Press Freedom (2011-2012)
    Annexure: Subject Index of Adjudications in Complaints Regarding Threats to Press Freedom (2011-2012) Sl. No. Parties Date of Decision Category Harassment to Newsmen 1 Complaint of Shri Satish Bhatia, District Correspondent, November 17, Disposed off Rashtriya Sahara, District Sonebadra, Uttar Pradesh 2011 being against anti social elements and local police authorities. infructuous 2 Complaint of Shri Awdesh Singh Patel, Correspondent, ,, Directions Amar Ujala, Banda, U.P. against the police authorities. 3 ,, Disposed off Complaint of the General Secretary, UT with Journalist Union, Daman against the observations police authorities. 4 M Complaint of Shri Satish Sharma, ,, Disposed off Managing Editor, Savera India Times, with Nani Daman against the police observations authorities. 5 Complaint of Shri Anurag Srivastava, Correspondent ,, Advise Swatantra Bharat, Kanpur, U.P. against the Station House Officer, Jalaun, Uttar Pradesh. 6 Complaint of Shri Devender Kumar Sharma, ,, Caution Owner/Publisher/Editor, Weekly Amar Tanav, Hathras, issued to District Mahamaya Nagar, U.P. against Shri S.R.Aditya, authorities Superintendent of Police, S.P. Singh, District Social Welfare Department and Shri Narayan Lal, Agent of District Social Welfare Department. 7 Complaint of Shri Kamlesh Kumar Jha, Correspondent, March 27, 2012 Disposed off Dainik Jagran, Samastipur, Bihar against Shri Maheshwar Hazari, MLA, Bihar. 8 Complaint of Shri Ram Singh Gautam, Correspondent, ,, Sub-judice Manavta Ki Raksha, Bulandshehar, U.P. against Shri Naveen Mittal, Advocate, Bulandshahar. _________________________________________________________________________________ M: Adjudications Merged Sl. No. Parties Date of Decision Category 9 Complaint of Shri Mukesh Thakur, Correspondent, Agni March 27, 2012 Dismissed Blast, Monthly Magazine, Indore, Madhya Pradesh against (i) Shri Uma Shankar Gupta, State Home Minister, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (ii) S.S.P., Indore, (iii) IP&RD Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Ram Janma Bhoomi Facts
    1 “OM” Jai Sri Ram! Facts About Sri Ram Janma-Bhoomi Liberation Movement 01. Points of dispute (i) The Ayodhya dispute is not any ordinary temple-mosque dispute as the Temple of Nativity of Sri Ram is not just any other temple! (ii) It is a struggle to reclaim and regain the haloed Native Land/Birthplace of Bhagwan, and this Native Land is a Deity in itself and there can be no splitting up or division of the Deity. Ramlala Virajman (Infant Sri Ram sitting at His Birthplace) at His Native Land – is a perpetual minor and a juridical person – a legal entity – having a distinct identity and legal rights and obligations under the law. None else can have ownership rights over Bhagwan’s property. (iii) The birthplace is non-exchangeable. It cannot be swapped, bartered, sold or donated! (iv) The entire dispute is over about 1460 square yards (1209.026 Square Meter) of land – the length-width of which is maximum 140 X 100 feet. The 70 acres of land acquired by the Government of India is separate from it and is with the Government of India over which no lawsuit is pending in court. (v) The entire site under consideration in the court is that of Ramlala (Infant Ram) Virajman. It is the Place of Birth, Place of Pastimes, playing field and recreational area of Bhagwan. Describing the significance of this place, the Skanda Purana, written thousands of years ago, says that the Darshan (discerning/sighting) of the haloed birthplace of Sri Ram is liberating. (vi) Temples of adorable Deities of any community can be built in many places in the country, statues of great men can be put up at many places, but their place of manifestation/birth would be located at one place and that can never be dislocated or put out of place.
    [Show full text]
  • TIF - the Ayodhya Verdict Dissected
    TIF - The Ayodhya Verdict Dissected SAIF AHMAD KHAN February 7, 2020 A view of the Babri Masjid overlooking the banks of the Sarayu as viewed in a late 18th century painting by William Hodges | Wikimedia A close analysis of the Supreme Court's final judgement on the Ayodhya dispute that has been criticised as much as it has been praised for how it has brought about closure The Supreme Court on 12 December 2019 dismissed the 18 review petitions which had been filed in response to its Ayodhya verdict. Although the Ayodhya title dispute lasted for over a century, the apex court acted in the swiftest possible manner while disposing of the review pleas. It did not “find any ground whatsoever” to entertain the review petitions after having “carefully gone through” the attached papers that had been submitted. Despite the Court’s benevolent view of its judgement, the truth is that the verdict pronounced by the five-judge bench on November 9 was full of contradictions. To put it plainly: the Supreme Court chose to bow down before the forces of majoritarian thuggery and extremism. Logic and law were conveniently set aside by the top court to appease a certain radical section of the society. Attempt to pacify the Muslim litigants To do complete justice in the Ayodhya dispute, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. Technically speaking, Article 142 can be employed in cases of second appeal. The Ayodhya title dispute wasn’t heard at the level of a district court. It came directly for hearing before the Allahabad High Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Modification of the High Court Cision.' Haryana Will Go to Polls on Oc- a Decision
    If a man achieves victory over this THURSDAY body, who in the world can OCTOBER 17, 2019 exercise power over him? He who CHANDIGARH rules himself rules over the whole VOL. XXIII, NO. 248 world. PAGES 12 Rs. 2 Vinoba Bhave YUGMARGYOUR REGION, YOUR PAPER Sultan of Johor Cup: India Corruption increased whenever Bhumi shares her first look defeat Australia 5-1 Congress came to power: Shah from'Pati Patni Aur Woh' ...PAGE 10 ...PAGE 12 .... PAGE 3 Ayodhya land dispute: Arguments concluded, SC reserves verdict Three LeT militants killed in Anantnag Judgement likely to be pronounced in 2nd week of Nov encounter ANANTNAG: Three Lashkar-e- AGENCY Drama during Taiba (LeT) militants were killed NEW DELHI, OCT 16 by security forces in an en- hearing on 40th day counter which ensued during a The Supreme Court on Thursday NEW DELHI: Tempers rose in- Cordon and Search Operation reserved its verdict on a batch of side the Supreme Court cham- Jolt to Cong, Tanwar (CASO) in this south Kashmir petitions in connection with the bers on Wednesday—the final district on Wednesday, official Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land day of hearing in the Ayodhya ti- sources said. dispute case. tle dispute case, as the Muslim This is the first CASO launched The five-judge Constitution side tore into shreds a document by the security forces in Kashmir extends support to JJP submitted by the Hindu side, valley after post-paid mobile bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India right in front of the five-judge phones were restored on Mon- bench headed by Chief Justice day noon after remaining sus- Ranjan Gogoi, today reserved its AGENCY nounced on October 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 Th Century India
    "WHEN THE SAINTS GO MARCHING IN" Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 th Century India MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE by OF TECHNOLOGY JUL 1 6 2009 Rajesh Pradhan S.M.Arch.S. Architecture & M.C.P. City Planning LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2009 ©2009 Rajesh Pradhan. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. ARCHNES Signature of Author: SDep ment of Political Science / ,,ebTer 21, 2008 Certified by: .................... ........ .................. Melissa Nobles Associate Irofessor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by:.. ..................................... Roger Petersen Associate Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee "WHEN THE SAINTS GO MARCHING IN" Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 th Century India by Rajesh Pradhan Submitted to the Department of Political Science on October 21, 2008 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervised by Melissa Nobles, Associate Professor of Political Science ABSTRACT This empirical study examines the political significance of religious leaders-known commonly as sadhus-in a huge and mature democracy like India. During the late '80s and the '90s, a flurry of sadhu activism coincided with the dramatic rise of a previously insignificant political party, the Bhartiya JanataParty (BJP). As a conservative Hindu nationalist party, the BJP allied with many sadhus, came to power at the center and in many states, breaking the monopoly that the relatively secular Congress party had held for more than four decades.
    [Show full text]