Focus Will Now Shift to Babri Demolition Case
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School May 2017 Modern Mythologies: The picE Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature Sucheta Kanjilal University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kanjilal, Sucheta, "Modern Mythologies: The pE ic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6875 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Mythologies: The Epic Imagination in Contemporary Indian Literature by Sucheta Kanjilal A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Literature Department of English College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gurleen Grewal, Ph.D. Gil Ben-Herut, Ph.D. Hunt Hawkins, Ph.D. Quynh Nhu Le, Ph.D. Date of Approval: May 4, 2017 Keywords: South Asian Literature, Epic, Gender, Hinduism Copyright © 2017, Sucheta Kanjilal DEDICATION To my mother: for pencils, erasers, and courage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When I was growing up in New Delhi, India in the late 1980s and the early 1990s, my father was writing an English language rock-opera based on the Mahabharata called Jaya, which would be staged in 1997. An upper-middle-class Bengali Brahmin with an English-language based education, my father was as influenced by the mythological tales narrated to him by his grandmother as he was by the musicals of Broadway impressario Andrew Lloyd Webber. -
Ayodhya Case Supreme Court Verdict
Ayodhya Case Supreme Court Verdict Alimental Charley antagonising rearward. Conscientious Andrus scribbled his trifocal come-backs Mondays. Comedic or deific, Heath never rules any arracks! The ramayana epic were all manner, the important features specific domain iframes to monitor the realization of the request timeout or basic functions of supreme court ruling remain to worship in decision Mars rover ready for landing tomorrow: Know where to watch Pers. Xilinx deal shows AMD is a force in chip industry once more. He also dabbles in writing on current events and issues. Ramayan had given detailed information on how the raging sea was bridged for a huge army to cross into Lanka to free Sita. Various attempts were made at mediation, including while the Supreme Court was hearing the appeal, but none managed to bring all parties on board. Ram outside the Supreme Court. Woman and her kids drink urine. And that was overall the Muslim reaction to the Supreme Court verdict. Two FIRs filed in the case. Pilgrimage was tolerated, but the tax on pilgrims ensured that the temples did not receive much income. In either view of the matter, environment law cannot countenance the notion of an ex post facto clearance. While living in Paris, Maria developed a serious obsession with café culture, and went on to review coffee shops as an intern for Time Out. Do not have pension checks direct deposited into a bank account, if possible. Vauxhall image blurred in the background. The exercise of upgradation of NRC is not intended to be one of identification and determination of who are original inhabitants of the State of Assam. -
SHARE a MESSAGE of LOVE #Pandoravalentines
Leader in South Asian News - Tel: 905-795-0639 Friday, FebruaryJune 2, 2017 1, 2019 www.WeeklyVoice.com VolVol 25, 23, No. No. 05 22 PM: 40025701 SHARE A MESSAGE OF LOVE #PANDORAValentines THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE THE PANDORA STORE BRAMALEA CITY ERIN MILLS TOWN MAPLEVIEW SQUARE ONE CENTRE CENTRE CENTRE SHOPPING CENTRE 905.792.8820 905.828.5902 905.632.5400 905.232.0661 © 2019 Pandora Jewelry, LLC • All rights reserved A-2 | Friday, February 1, 2019 www.WeeklyVoice.com co-sponsored in part by Ninepoint Alternative Health Fund The first actively managed mutual fund in Canada focused on the cannabis sector. A mutual fund that takes advantage of changing dynamics in an early stage sector and aims to mitigate risk by diversifying across cannabis and neutraceutical sectors. Co-sponsored in part by Invest in the world’s fastest-growing major GATEWAY TO economy, with unique access to the entire spectrum of the Indian market, including NEW INDIA small and mid-cap equities, as well as Indian fixed-income. Ninepoint Partners is an independent investment manager committed to adding value to SUN LIFE EXCEL INDIA FUND investors’ portfolios through innovative thinking and real-world solutions. SUN LIFE EXCEL INDIA BALANCED FUND Learn more at www.ninepoint.com. InvestSUN LIFE EXC ELin NEW INDIA LEADERS FUND For more information, please call a Financial Advisor at: companies inventingWWW.SHAHFINANCIAL.CA WWW.SHAHFINANCIAL.CA NinepointNinepoint Partners Partners LP is is the the investment investment manager manager to the Ninepoint to the Ninepoint Funds (collectively, Funds (collectively, the ‘’Funds’’). -
Concerned Citizens Tribunal - Gujarat 2002 an Inquiry Into the Carnage in Gujarat
Concerned Citizens Tribunal - Gujarat 2002 An inquiry into the carnage in Gujarat Hate Speech The carnage in Gujarat was marked by unprecedented levels of hate speech and hate propaganda. Some examples: Chief Minister Narendra Modi Terming the (Godhra) attack as ‘pre-planned, violent act of terrorism’, Mr Modi said that state government was viewing this attack seriously. — The Times of India, Feb 28, 2002. "With the entire population of Gujarat very angry at what happened in Godhra much worse was expected". — Narendra Modi, at a Press Conference in Gujarat, Feb 28, 2002. Modi said he was ‘absolutely satisfied’ with the way in which the police and State Government handled the backlash from Godhra incident and ‘happy’ that violence was largely contained… "We should be happy that curfew has been imposed only at 26 places while there is anger and people are burning with revenge. Thanks to security arrangements we brought things under control".When asked that not a policeman was visible in most areas where shops were looted and set on fire, he said he hadn’t received any complaint. — The Indian Express, March 1, 2002. "Investigations have revealed that the firing by the Congressman played a pivotal role in inciting the mob." — CM Narendra Modi on Chamanpura incident where former MP Ahsan Jaffri was burned alive with 19 of his relatives. On being asked what could have lead to the Ex-MP opening fire it was ‘probably in his nature’ to do so. — The Hindustan Times, March 2, 2002. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Friday termed ‘barbaric’ the murder of former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri along with 19 of his family members, but said there was firing from inside the house. -
SLP Crl No. 2275 of 2011
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.751of 2017 (@Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.2275 of 2011) State (through) Central Bureau of Investigation …Appellant Versus Shri Kalyan Singh (former CM of UP) & Ors. …Respondents J U D G M E N T R.F. NARIMAN, J. Leave granted. 1. The present appeal arises out of the demolition of Babri Masjid. We are concerned in this case with two FIRs lodged on 6th December, 1992. The first viz. Crime No.197 of 1992, is against lakhs of kar sewaks alleging the offences of dacoity, robbery, causing of hurt, injuring/defiling places of public worship, promoting enmity between two groups on grounds of religion, etc. The IPC offences were, therefore, under Sections 153-A, 295, 297, 332, 337, 338, 395 and 397. The second FIR 1 viz. FIR No.198 of 1992 was lodged against eight persons named therein - Mr. L.K. Advani, Mr. Ashok Singhal, Mr. Vinay Katiar, Ms. Uma Bharati, Ms. Sadhvi Ritambara, Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi, Mr. Giriraj Kishore and Mr. Vishnu Hari Dalmia, two of whom are dead due to passage of time viz. Mr. Ashok Singhal and Mr. Giriraj Kishore. The FIR alleges offences under Sections 153-A, 153-B and Section 505 IPC. 46 further FIRs pertaining to cognizable offences and 1 FIR pertaining to non- cognizable offences were also lodged. Initially, a Special Court set up at Lalitpur was to try these cases but subsequently notifications were issued by the State Government, after consultation with the High Court, dated 8 th September, 1993 whereby these cases were to be tried by a Special Court at Lucknow. -
“Freedom of Religion”, *Muskan Dhakad
Volume 2, July 2018 ISSN 2581-5504 “Freedom of Religion” Muskan Dhakad B.B.A.LL.B Indore Institute of Law ABSTRACT Freedom of religion is in the Article (25-28) . It defines that the different religion have different culture. Religion is a matter of faith with individuals or communities. The state can have no religion of its own. They give equal treatment to the temple , church, and the mosque. The state is neutral treats all the religions equally. Religion is based on belief practise is to perform the religious beliefs , duties, rites, rituals and ideas prescribed by religious orders according their beliefs. Long time ago when only ruling on the everywhere Brahmins got the big place they got treatment at the above level . Religion is not defined in the constitution but it means that worship of rituals and beliefs. INTRODUCTION Freedom of religion article (25-28) . India is a secular state. State treats equally all religion. Religion has its own value in the Indians life. Freedom of religion means that different religions have their ways of worship and different spirituals and way of marriage in Hindus and Muslims. Hindus use Sanskrit language while worship in the temple. Muslims use Urdu language when they are reading Quran and Christian used to have read bible during the worship in the church. Every citizen of India have the freedom of adopting any religion according to their concern. Hindus who, when young, had from pressure become Musalmans, were allowed to go back to the faith of their fathers. No man should be interfered with on account of his religion, and every one should be allowed to change his religion, if he liked. -
Exegesis of the Ayodhya Verdict
EXEGESIS OF THE AYODHYA VERDICT OVERVIEW: The report throws light on the Supreme Court verdict released on November 9th 2019 with regards to the Ayodhya case and the intricate history revolving the case. The Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute or more commonly known as the Ayodhya case has been the most controversial court case of Independent India. It has been an emotive issue and has been mired in a slew of legal suites for over 70 years. The entire dispute is about 2.77 acres of land, which is approximately the size of two football fields. And yet, this land dispute has continued from the Mughal-era to a British rule to 2019, until, the legal conclusion on the case was announced by the Supreme Court on 9th November 2019, marking an end to decades of uncertainty on the issue. What value do this 2.77 acres hold for the people of India that turned this case into one of the most sensitive and controversial cases in India? What could be the influence of the verdict on this case and to what extent could it affect the common man? To be able to answer such questions, we need to understand the labyrinthine events that triggered this dispute. HISTORY: A. TEMPLE DEMOLISHMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF MOSQUE • The Hindu epic Ramayana states that the Hindu deity Lord Ram was born almost 900,000 years ago during the Treta Yuga in Ayodhya on the banks of the river Sarayu. This is identified with present-day Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh. According to the beliefs of the Hindus, the ancient temple which stood in place of the demolished Babri mosque marked the exact birthplace of Lord Ram. -
Subject Index of Adjudications in Complaints Regarding Threats to Press Freedom (2011-2012)
Annexure: Subject Index of Adjudications in Complaints Regarding Threats to Press Freedom (2011-2012) Sl. No. Parties Date of Decision Category Harassment to Newsmen 1 Complaint of Shri Satish Bhatia, District Correspondent, November 17, Disposed off Rashtriya Sahara, District Sonebadra, Uttar Pradesh 2011 being against anti social elements and local police authorities. infructuous 2 Complaint of Shri Awdesh Singh Patel, Correspondent, ,, Directions Amar Ujala, Banda, U.P. against the police authorities. 3 ,, Disposed off Complaint of the General Secretary, UT with Journalist Union, Daman against the observations police authorities. 4 M Complaint of Shri Satish Sharma, ,, Disposed off Managing Editor, Savera India Times, with Nani Daman against the police observations authorities. 5 Complaint of Shri Anurag Srivastava, Correspondent ,, Advise Swatantra Bharat, Kanpur, U.P. against the Station House Officer, Jalaun, Uttar Pradesh. 6 Complaint of Shri Devender Kumar Sharma, ,, Caution Owner/Publisher/Editor, Weekly Amar Tanav, Hathras, issued to District Mahamaya Nagar, U.P. against Shri S.R.Aditya, authorities Superintendent of Police, S.P. Singh, District Social Welfare Department and Shri Narayan Lal, Agent of District Social Welfare Department. 7 Complaint of Shri Kamlesh Kumar Jha, Correspondent, March 27, 2012 Disposed off Dainik Jagran, Samastipur, Bihar against Shri Maheshwar Hazari, MLA, Bihar. 8 Complaint of Shri Ram Singh Gautam, Correspondent, ,, Sub-judice Manavta Ki Raksha, Bulandshehar, U.P. against Shri Naveen Mittal, Advocate, Bulandshahar. _________________________________________________________________________________ M: Adjudications Merged Sl. No. Parties Date of Decision Category 9 Complaint of Shri Mukesh Thakur, Correspondent, Agni March 27, 2012 Dismissed Blast, Monthly Magazine, Indore, Madhya Pradesh against (i) Shri Uma Shankar Gupta, State Home Minister, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (ii) S.S.P., Indore, (iii) IP&RD Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh. -
Ram Janma Bhoomi Facts
1 “OM” Jai Sri Ram! Facts About Sri Ram Janma-Bhoomi Liberation Movement 01. Points of dispute (i) The Ayodhya dispute is not any ordinary temple-mosque dispute as the Temple of Nativity of Sri Ram is not just any other temple! (ii) It is a struggle to reclaim and regain the haloed Native Land/Birthplace of Bhagwan, and this Native Land is a Deity in itself and there can be no splitting up or division of the Deity. Ramlala Virajman (Infant Sri Ram sitting at His Birthplace) at His Native Land – is a perpetual minor and a juridical person – a legal entity – having a distinct identity and legal rights and obligations under the law. None else can have ownership rights over Bhagwan’s property. (iii) The birthplace is non-exchangeable. It cannot be swapped, bartered, sold or donated! (iv) The entire dispute is over about 1460 square yards (1209.026 Square Meter) of land – the length-width of which is maximum 140 X 100 feet. The 70 acres of land acquired by the Government of India is separate from it and is with the Government of India over which no lawsuit is pending in court. (v) The entire site under consideration in the court is that of Ramlala (Infant Ram) Virajman. It is the Place of Birth, Place of Pastimes, playing field and recreational area of Bhagwan. Describing the significance of this place, the Skanda Purana, written thousands of years ago, says that the Darshan (discerning/sighting) of the haloed birthplace of Sri Ram is liberating. (vi) Temples of adorable Deities of any community can be built in many places in the country, statues of great men can be put up at many places, but their place of manifestation/birth would be located at one place and that can never be dislocated or put out of place. -
TIF - the Ayodhya Verdict Dissected
TIF - The Ayodhya Verdict Dissected SAIF AHMAD KHAN February 7, 2020 A view of the Babri Masjid overlooking the banks of the Sarayu as viewed in a late 18th century painting by William Hodges | Wikimedia A close analysis of the Supreme Court's final judgement on the Ayodhya dispute that has been criticised as much as it has been praised for how it has brought about closure The Supreme Court on 12 December 2019 dismissed the 18 review petitions which had been filed in response to its Ayodhya verdict. Although the Ayodhya title dispute lasted for over a century, the apex court acted in the swiftest possible manner while disposing of the review pleas. It did not “find any ground whatsoever” to entertain the review petitions after having “carefully gone through” the attached papers that had been submitted. Despite the Court’s benevolent view of its judgement, the truth is that the verdict pronounced by the five-judge bench on November 9 was full of contradictions. To put it plainly: the Supreme Court chose to bow down before the forces of majoritarian thuggery and extremism. Logic and law were conveniently set aside by the top court to appease a certain radical section of the society. Attempt to pacify the Muslim litigants To do complete justice in the Ayodhya dispute, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. Technically speaking, Article 142 can be employed in cases of second appeal. The Ayodhya title dispute wasn’t heard at the level of a district court. It came directly for hearing before the Allahabad High Court. -
Modification of the High Court Cision.' Haryana Will Go to Polls on Oc- a Decision
If a man achieves victory over this THURSDAY body, who in the world can OCTOBER 17, 2019 exercise power over him? He who CHANDIGARH rules himself rules over the whole VOL. XXIII, NO. 248 world. PAGES 12 Rs. 2 Vinoba Bhave YUGMARGYOUR REGION, YOUR PAPER Sultan of Johor Cup: India Corruption increased whenever Bhumi shares her first look defeat Australia 5-1 Congress came to power: Shah from'Pati Patni Aur Woh' ...PAGE 10 ...PAGE 12 .... PAGE 3 Ayodhya land dispute: Arguments concluded, SC reserves verdict Three LeT militants killed in Anantnag Judgement likely to be pronounced in 2nd week of Nov encounter ANANTNAG: Three Lashkar-e- AGENCY Drama during Taiba (LeT) militants were killed NEW DELHI, OCT 16 by security forces in an en- hearing on 40th day counter which ensued during a The Supreme Court on Thursday NEW DELHI: Tempers rose in- Cordon and Search Operation reserved its verdict on a batch of side the Supreme Court cham- Jolt to Cong, Tanwar (CASO) in this south Kashmir petitions in connection with the bers on Wednesday—the final district on Wednesday, official Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid land day of hearing in the Ayodhya ti- sources said. dispute case. tle dispute case, as the Muslim This is the first CASO launched The five-judge Constitution side tore into shreds a document by the security forces in Kashmir extends support to JJP submitted by the Hindu side, valley after post-paid mobile bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India right in front of the five-judge phones were restored on Mon- bench headed by Chief Justice day noon after remaining sus- Ranjan Gogoi, today reserved its AGENCY nounced on October 24. -
Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 Th Century India
"WHEN THE SAINTS GO MARCHING IN" Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 th Century India MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE by OF TECHNOLOGY JUL 1 6 2009 Rajesh Pradhan S.M.Arch.S. Architecture & M.C.P. City Planning LIBRARIES Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2009 ©2009 Rajesh Pradhan. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. ARCHNES Signature of Author: SDep ment of Political Science / ,,ebTer 21, 2008 Certified by: .................... ........ .................. Melissa Nobles Associate Irofessor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by:.. ..................................... Roger Petersen Associate Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee "WHEN THE SAINTS GO MARCHING IN" Sadhus in Democratic Politics in Late 20 th Century India by Rajesh Pradhan Submitted to the Department of Political Science on October 21, 2008 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervised by Melissa Nobles, Associate Professor of Political Science ABSTRACT This empirical study examines the political significance of religious leaders-known commonly as sadhus-in a huge and mature democracy like India. During the late '80s and the '90s, a flurry of sadhu activism coincided with the dramatic rise of a previously insignificant political party, the Bhartiya JanataParty (BJP). As a conservative Hindu nationalist party, the BJP allied with many sadhus, came to power at the center and in many states, breaking the monopoly that the relatively secular Congress party had held for more than four decades.