DOCSLIB.ORG

Full List Sorted by Common Name (PDF As of 6/30/21)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full List Sorted by Common Name (PDF As of 6/30/21) Insects and Related Organisms Sorted by Common Name Updated 6/30/21 Common Name Scientific Name Order Family A abbreviated wireworm Hypnoidus abbreviatus (Say) COLEOPTERA Elateridae acacia psyllid Acizzia uncatoides (Ferris & Klyver) HEMIPTERA Psyllidae achemon sphinx Eumorpha achemon (Drury) LEPIDOPTERA Sphingidae acuminate scale Kilifia acuminata (Signoret) HEMIPTERA Coccidae acute-angled fungus beetle Cryptophagus acutangulus Gyllenhal COLEOPTERA Cryptophagidae aerial yellowjacket Dolichovespula arenaria (Fabricius) HYMENOPTERA Vespidae African fig fly Zaprionus indianus Gupta DIPTERA Drosophilidae African mole cricket Gryllotalpa africana Palisot de Beauvois ORTHOPTERA Gryllotalpidae ailanthus webworm Atteva punctella (Cramer) LEPIDOPTERA Yponomeutidae alder bark beetle Alniphagus aspericollis (LeConte) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae alder flea beetle Altica ambiens (LeConte) COLEOPTERA Chrysomelidae alder spittlebug Clastoptera obtusa (Say) HEMIPTERA Cercopidae alfalfa blotch leafminer Agromyza frontella (Rondani) DIPTERA Agromyzidae alfalfa caterpillar Colias eurytheme Boisduval LEPIDOPTERA Pieridae alfalfa gall midge Asphondylia websteri Felt DIPTERA Cecidomyiidae alfalfa leafcutting bee Megachile rotundata (Fabricius) HYMENOPTERA Megachilidae alfalfa leaftier Dichomeris acuminata (Staudinger) LEPIDOPTERA Gelechiidae alfalfa looper Autographa californica (Speyer) LEPIDOPTERA Noctuidae alfalfa plant bug Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze) HEMIPTERA Miridae alfalfa seed chalcid Bruchophagus roddi (Gussakovsky) HYMENOPTERA Eurytomidae alfalfa snout beetle Otiorhynchus ligustici (Linnaeus) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae alfalfa webworm Loxostege cereralis (Zeller) LEPIDOPTERA Crambidae alfalfa weevil Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae alkali bee Nomia melanderi Cockerell HYMENOPTERA Halictidae Allard’s ground cricket Allonemobius allardi (Alexander & Thomas 1959) ORTHOPTERA Gryllidae Allard's tree cricket Oecanthus allardi T. Walker and Gurney ORTHOPTERA Gryllidae Allegheny mound ant Formica exsectoides Forel HYMENOPTERA Formicidae allium leafminer Phytomyza gymnostoma (Loew) DIPTERA Agromyzidae almond moth Cadra cautella (Walker) LEPIDOPTERA Pyralidae aloe mite Aceria aloinis (Keifer) ACARI Eriophyidae American aspen beetle Gonioctena americana (Schaeffer) COLEOPTERA Chrysomelidae American black flour beetle Tribolium audax Halstead COLEOPTERA Tenebrionidae American bumble bee Bombus pensylvanicus (De Geer) HYMENOPTERA Apidae American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Olivier COLEOPTERA Silphidae American cockroach Periplaneta americana (Linnaeus) BLATTODEA Blattidae 1 American dagger moth Acronicta americana (Harris) LEPIDOPTERA Noctuidae American dog tick Dermacentor variabilis (Say) ACARI Ixodidae American grasshopper Schistocerca americana (Drury) ORTHOPTERA Acrididae American hornet moth Sesia tibialis (Harris) LEPIDOPTERA Sesiidae American house dust mite Dermatophagoides farinae Hughes ACARI Pyroglyphidae American palm cixiid Myndus crudus Van Duzee HEMIPTERA Cixiidae American plum borer Euzophera semifuneralis (Walker) LEPIDOPTERA Pyralidae American serpentine leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) DIPTERA Agromyzidae American spider beetle Mezium americanum (Castelnau) COLEOPTERA Ptinidae annual bluegrass weevil Listronotus maculicollis (Kirby) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae Angora goat biting louse Bovicola crassipes (Rudow) PHTHIRAPTERA Trichodectidae Angoumois grain moth Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) LEPIDOPTERA Gelechiidae angraecum scale Conchaspis angraeci Cockerell HEMIPTERA Conchaspididae angularwinged katydid Microcentrum retinerve (Burmeister) ORTHOPTERA Tettigoniidae angulate leafhopper Acinopterus angulatus Lawson HEMIPTERA Cicadellidae anthurium whitefly Aleurotulus anthuricola Nakahara HEMIPTERA Aleyrodidae apple aphid Aphis pomi De Geer HEMIPTERA Aphididae apple bark borer Synanthedon pyri (Harris) LEPIDOPTERA Sesiidae apple barkminer Marmara elotella (Busck) LEPIDOPTERA Gracillariidae apple blotch leafminer Phyllonorycter crataegella (Clemens) LEPIDOPTERA Gracillariidae apple curculio Anthonomus quadrigibbus Say COLEOPTERA Curculionidae apple flea weevil Rhynchaenus pallicornis (Say) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae apple fruit moth Argyresthia conjugella Zeller LEPIDOPTERA Argyresthiidae apple fruitminer Marmara pomonella Busck LEPIDOPTERA Gracillariidae apple grain aphid Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae (Schrank) HEMIPTERA Aphididae apple leafhopper Empoasca maligna (Walsh) HEMIPTERA Cicadellidae apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) DIPTERA Tephritidae apple mealybug Phenacoccus aceris (Signoret) HEMIPTERA Pseudococcidae apple red bug Lygidea mendax Reuter HEMIPTERA Miridae apple rust mite Aculus schlechtendali (Nalepa) ACARI Eriophyidae apple seed chalcid Torymus varians (Walker) HYMENOPTERA Torymidae apple sucker Cacopsylla mali (Schmidberger) HEMIPTERA Psyllidae apple twig borer Amphicerus bicaudatus (Say) COLEOPTERA Bostrichidae apple-and-thorn skeletonizer Choreutis pariana (Clerck) LEPIDOPTERA Choreutidae appleleaf skeletonizer Psorosina hammondi (Riley) LEPIDOPTERA Pyralidae appleleaf trumpet miner Tischeria malifoliella Clemens LEPIDOPTERA Tischeriidae araucaria aphid Neophyllaphis araucariae Takahashi HEMIPTERA Aphididae araucaria mealybug Acanthococcus araucariae (Maskell) HEMIPTERA Eriococcidae arborvitae leafminer Argyresthia thuiella (Packard) LEPIDOPTERA Argyresthiidae arborvitae weevil Phyllobius intrusus Kono COLEOPTERA Curculionidae Argentine ant Linepithema humile (Mayr) HYMENOPTERA Formicidae 2 argus tortoise beetle Chelymorpha cassidea (Fabricius) COLEOPTERA Chrysomelidae arid land subterranean termite Reticulitermes tibialis Banks BLATTODEA Rhinotermitidae Arizona fivespined ips Ips lecontei Swaine COLEOPTERA Curculionidae army cutworm Euxoa auxiliaris (Grote) LEPIDOPTERA Noctuidae armyworm Mythimna unipuncta (Haworth) LEPIDOPTERA Noctuidae arroyo willow stem-galling sawfly Euura lasiolepis Smith HYMENOPTERA Tenthredinidae artichoke plume moth Platyptilia carduidactyla (Riley) LEPIDOPTERA Pterophoridae ash borer* Podosesia syringae (Harris) LEPIDOPTERA Sesiidae *Also called lilac borer ash plant bug Tropidosteptes amoenus Reuter HEMIPTERA Miridae ashgray blister beetle Epicauta fabricii (LeConte) COLEOPTERA Meloidae Ashton cuckoo bumble bee Bombus ashtoni (Cresson) HYMENOPTERA Apidae Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Yasumatsu) HYMENOPTERA Cynipidae Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama HEMIPTERA Liviidae Asian cockroach Blattella asahinai Mizukubo BLATTODEA Blattellidae Asian longhorned beetle Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) COLEOPTERA Cerambycidae Asian longhorned tick Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann ACARI Ixodidae Asian needle ant Pachycondyla chinensis (Emery) HYMENOPTERA Formicidae Asian subterranean termite Coptotermes gestroi (Wasmann) BLATTODEA Rhinotermitidae Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse) DIPTERA Culicidae Asiatic garden beetle Maladera castanea (Arrow) COLEOPTERA Scarabaeidae Asiatic oak weevil Cyrtepistomus castaneus (Roelofs) COLEOPTERA Curculionidae Asiatic rice borer Chilo suppressalis (Walker) LEPIDOPTERA Crambidae Asiatic rose scale Aulacaspis rosarum Borchsenius HEMIPTERA Diaspididae asparagus aphid Brachycorynella asparagi (Mordvilko) HEMIPTERA Aphididae asparagus beetle Crioceris asparagi (Linnaeus) COLEOPTERA Chrysomelidae asparagus miner Ophiomyia simplex (Loew) DIPTERA Agromyzidae asparagus spider mite Schizotetranychus asparagi (Oudemans) ACARI Tetranychidae aspen blotchminer Phyllonorycter tremuloidiella (Braun) LEPIDOPTERA Gracillariidae aspen leaf beetle Chrysomela crotchi Brown COLEOPTERA Chrysomelidae aster leafhopper Macrosteles quadrilineatus (Forbes) HEMIPTERA Cicadellidae aster leafminer Calycomyza humeralis (Roser) DIPTERA Agromyzidae Australian cockroach Periplaneta australasiae (Fabricius) BLATTODEA Blattidae Australian fern weevil Syagrius fulvitarsis Pascoe COLEOPTERA Curculionidae Australian mantid Tenodera australasiae (Leach) MANTODEA Mantidae Australian pine borer Chrysobothris tranquebarica (Gmelin) COLEOPTERA Buprestidae Australian rat flea Xenopsylla vexabilis (Jordan) SIPHONAPTERA Pulicidae Australian spider beetle Ptinus ocellus Brown COLEOPTERA Ptinidae avocado brown mite Oligonychus punicae (Hirst) ACARI Tetranychidae avocado red mite Oligonychus yothersi (McGregor) ACARI Tetranychidae avocado seed moth Stenoma catenifer Walsingham LEPIDOPTERA Elachistidae 3 avocado thrips Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara THYSANOPTERA Thripidae avocado whitefly Trialeurodes floridensis (Quaintance) HEMIPTERA Aleyrodidae azalea bark scale Acanthococcus azaleae (Comstock) HEMIPTERA Eriococcidae azalea caterpillar Datana major Grote & Robinson LEPIDOPTERA Notodontidae azalea lace bug Stephanitis pyrioides (Scott) HEMIPTERA Tingidae azalea leafminer Caloptilia azaleella (Brants) LEPIDOPTERA Gracillariidae azalea plant bug Rhinocapsus vanduzeei Uhler HEMIPTERA Miridae azalea white mite Eotetranychus clitus Pritchard & Baker ACARI Tetranychidae azalea whitefly Pealius azaleae (Baker & Moles) HEMIPTERA Aleyrodidae B bagworm Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Haworth) LEPIDOPTERA Psychidae Bahaman swallowtail Papilio andraemon bonhotei Sharpe LEPIDOPTERA Papilionidae baldcypress coneworm Dioryctria pygmaeella Ragonot LEPIDOPTERA Pyralidae baldfaced hornet Dolichovespula maculata (Linnaeus) HYMENOPTERA Vespidae balsam fir sawfly Neodiprion abietis (Harris) HYMENOPTERA Diprionidae balsam fir sawyer Monochamus marmorator Kirby COLEOPTERA Cerambycidae balsam gall midge Paradiplosis tumifex Gagné DIPTERA Cecidomyiidae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the Book Series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources Ed C
    Volume 6 (Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the book series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources ed C. Kole 2011 p179-197 9 Rubus J. Graham* and M. Woodhead Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Rosaceae family consists of around 3, 000 species of which 500 belong to the genus Rubus. Ploidy levels range from diploid to dodecaploid with a genomic number of 7, and members can be difficult to classify into distinct species due to hybridization and apomixes. Species are distributed widely across Asia, Europe, North and South America with the center of diversity now considered to be in China, where there are 250-700 species of Rubus depending on the taxonomists. Rubus species are an important horticultural source of income and labor being produced for the fresh and processing markets for their health benefits. Blackberries and raspberries have a relatively short history of less than a century as cultivated crops that have been enhanced through plant breeding and they are only a few generations removed from their wild progenitor species. Rubus sp. are typically found as early colonizers of disturbed sites such as pastures, along forest edges, in forest clearings and along roadsides. Blackberries are typically much more tolerant of drought, flooding and high temperatures, while red raspberries are more tolerant of cold winters. Additionally, they exhibit vigorous vegetative reproduction by either tip layering or root suckering, permitting Rubus genotypes to cover large areas. The attractiveness of the fruits to frugivores, especially birds, means that seed dispersal can be widespread with the result that Rubus genotypes can very easily be spread to new sites and are very effective, high-speed invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera)
    Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) Vilhelmsen, Lars; Shinohara, Akihiko Published in: European Journal of Taxonomy DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.608 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Vilhelmsen, L., & Shinohara, A. (2020). Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera). European Journal of Taxonomy, 608, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.608 Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 European Journal of Taxonomy 608: 1–23 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.608 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Vilhelmsen L. & Shinohara A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F46ACEF-D5F7-49EF-8E64-DE3452C0B280 Review of the genus classification of Abiinae (Cimbicidae, Hymenoptera) Lars VILHELMSEN 1,* & Akihiko SHINOHARA 2 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Denmark. 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C1C38989-562D-4490-B91F-C6C7AA4E5E4A 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C7382A9B-948F-479B-BEE7-848DAFECD3BA Abstract. Abiinae is the second-largest subfamily in Cimbicidae, a small family of true sawflies (Tenthredinoidea). The subfamily is adequately defined, but the generic classification has been unstable. Currently, only two genera are regarded as valid: Abia Leach, 1817 and Allabia Semenov & Gussakovskij, 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • Elderberry and Elderflower Sambucus( Spp.): a Cultivation Guide for Florida1 David Jarnagin, Ali Sarkhosh, Juanita Popenoe, Steve Sargent, and Kevin Athearn2
    HS1390 Elderberry and Elderflower (Sambucus spp.): A Cultivation Guide for Florida1 David Jarnagin, Ali Sarkhosh, Juanita Popenoe, Steve Sargent, and Kevin Athearn2 Elderberry, Sambucus spp., has long been cultivated or Pushes for commercial cultivation were initiated in various collected from the wild by humans for both food and regions of North America in the 1920s and again in the medicine. Europeans have used the flowers and fruit 1960s, but the most recent iteration of commercial cultiva- of Sambucus nigra for thousands of years, while Native tion over the last 10 to 15 years has outpaced the previous Americans and European immigrants used Sambucus nigra attempts considerably. The high levels of antioxidants and ssp. canadensis, native to the New World (Figure 1). health benefits of the fruit have created new demand for the fruit and flowers, and this new demand may provide an alternative crop opportunity for Florida growers with many value-added possibilities. A native species grows wild throughout Florida, indicating that this may be a perennial crop that can be sustainably grown on marginal land. However, the native Florida plants have many drawbacks compared to the more commonly cultivated forms originating from farther north, and these drawbacks are Figure 1. Elderberry and elderflower cymes. an important consideration for proper establishment on a Credits: Hyldemoer + Co., Florida commercial scale. The fruit and flowers of the elder are used for wine, preserves, tinctures, teas, brewing and distilled The purpose of this paper is to provide information on spirits, and dyes for both food and textiles. The anthocya- growing American elderberry in Florida as an alternative nins in the fruit have been found to have higher antioxidant crop for commercial growers as well as homeowners.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ERIOPHYID MITES of CALIFORNIA (Acarina: Eriophyidae) by H
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 2, NO. 1 THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA (Acarina: Eriophyidae) BY H. H. KEIFER (California Scare Department of Agriculture) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1352 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. 0. Essig, S. B. Freeborn, E. G. Linsley, R. L. Usinger Volume 2, No. 1, pp. 1-128, plates 1-39 Submitted by Editors, May 6, 1952 Issued December 12, 1952 Price $2.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATBS OF AMERICA Contents Page Introduction .......................... 1 Hostlist ........................... 5 Keys to Genera. Species. and higher Groups ...........11 Discussion of Species ..................... 20 Bib 1iography .......................... 62 Host index ........................... 64 List of comn names ...................... 67 Index to mites. Genera. Species. etc .............. 08 Plate symbols ......................... 71 List of plates ......................... 72 Plates ............................. 74 THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA Introduction ’IhisBulletin is the result of fifteen years would classify these mites at the present, faces of intermittent exploration of California for the prospect of a growing number of species in the Friophyid mites. hhen the work began in 1937 the large genera, and of broad revisions to come. But principal species recognized were the relatively I believe the average type of Eriophyid to have al- few economic species. ‘Ihis situation not only left ready been pretty well defined, since these mites an opportunity to discover and describe new spe- are widespread, and ancient in origin. cies, it also demanded that as many new Eriophyids As we now know these tiny creatures, they con- as possible be put in print in order to erect a stitute a closed group, structurally pointing to taxonomic framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Content in Riparian Arthropods Is Most Dependent on Allometry and Order
    Wiesenborn: Nitrogen Contents in Riparian Arthropods 71 NITROGEN CONTENT IN RIPARIAN ARTHROPODS IS MOST DEPENDENT ON ALLOMETRY AND ORDER WILLIAM D. WIESENBORN U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Regional Office, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City, NV 89006 ABSTRACT I investigated the contributions of body mass, order, family, and trophic level to nitrogen (N) content in riparian spiders and insects collected near the Colorado River in western Arizona. Most variation (97.2%) in N mass among arthropods was associated with the allometric effects of body mass. Nitrogen mass increased exponentially as body dry-mass increased. Significant variation (20.7%) in N mass adjusted for body mass was explained by arthropod order. Ad- justed N mass was highest in Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, Araneae, and Odonata and lowest in Coleoptera. Classifying arthropods by family compared with order did not explain signifi- cantly more variation (22.1%) in N content. Herbivore, predator, and detritivore trophic-levels across orders explained little variation (4.3%) in N mass adjusted for body mass. Within or- ders, N content differed only among trophic levels of Diptera. Adjusted N mass was highest in predaceous flies, intermediate in detritivorous flies, and lowest in phytophagous flies. Nitro- gen content in riparian spiders and insects is most dependent on allometry and order and least dependent on trophic level. I suggest the effects of allometry and order are due to exoskeleton thickness and composition. Foraging by vertebrate predators, such as insectivorous birds, may be affected by variation in N content among riparian arthropods. Key Words: nutrients, spiders, insects, trophic level, exoskeleton, cuticle RESUMEN Se investiguo las contribuciones de la masa de cuerpo, orden, familia y el nivel trófico al con- tenido de nitógeno (N) en arañas e insectos riparianos (que viven en la orilla del rio u otro cuerpo de agua) recolectadaos cerca del Rio Colorado en el oeste del estado de Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Country – Panama
    DATE – 10/27/16 COUNTRY – PANAMA All products for consumption require a sanitary certificate or an equivalent document, including those that are unrestricted. Prior notification of shipment arrival is required. Import notification form can be found at www.aupsa.gob.pa Commodities intended for consumption: Additional information regarding published phytosanitary requirements for commodities may be available at the AUPSA website. AUPSA does not provide Import permits (IP) for items intended for consumption or processing. Published requirements may be submitted for PC as a form of official correspondence, but make sure an English translation is also provided. Products for consumption AUPSA does not provide import permits for items for consumption. If a document is presented as an IP by the exporter which is entitled "Notification of Importation/Notificacion de Importacion.", this document does not list phytosanitary requirements and cannot be used for certification purposes. Refer to commodity summaries for requirements; if a commodity summary is not listed the exporter must submit the published requirements applicable to the product from the AUPSA import requirement website (with English translation). These may be sent to Export Services in order to construct a commodity summary for the product. If published requirements are used as official communication, include the AUPSA DINAN number on the PC (in lieu of an IP number). Re-Export No re-export shipments will be accepted without a PC from the country of origin. Unless a PC from the country of origin accompanies the shipment, DO NOT CERTIFY. Transiting shipments Plant material transiting through Panama is exempt from inspection and other restrictions provided plants are accompanied by a PC and are packed so as to prevent pest risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Membership 2005: Year in Review
    ESA Newsletter Information for the Members of the Entomological Society of America MARCH 2006 • VOLUME 29, NUMBER 3 Membership 2005: Year in Review By Chris Stelzig, Director of Membership we get too far into the year, I wanted to fin- not withstanding, this is a great, inexpensive and Marketing ish the update on 2005. way to get general feedback from you on a Sections and Branches—The Pacific wide range of topics. Headquarters uses this For the first time since 1992, ESA posted Branch saw the most growth when we com- data for planning purposes. In the Member- two back-to-back years of membership pare 2004 to 2005 with a 12% increase in ship Toolbox on the website (http://www. growth. This is a milestone, especially when membership. Only the Southeastern Branch entsoc.org/membership/toolbox/support_ coupled with the fact that just five years ago saw an actual decline, and that was merely esa/survey.htm), you will find a list of all our we were losing members by the hundreds by one person (a case in point to say that active surveys and an invitation to partici- every year and our funds were quickly dry- EVERY membership renewal is important!). pate in one. ing up. You’ve heard me say “Strength in Section B saw the largest growth last year, Performance—About 80% of members Numbers” for nearly five years now. The leaping more than 10%. who responded felt that they were satisfied reason for this is that membership is the Membership Types—As I mentioned with performance from ESA headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Eriophyoid Mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on Rubus Spp. in Britain, with a New Species (Diptilomiopidae) and Two New Records
    Zootaxa 2677: 15–26 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A review of the eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on Rubus spp. in Britain, with a new species (Diptilomiopidae) and two new records DANIEL R. L. PYE1 & ENRICO DE LILLO2 ¹The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] ²Dipartimento di Biologia e Chimica Agroforestale e Ambientale, sez. Entomologia e Zoologia, via Amendola, 165/a, 70126 Bari, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new vagrant species of eriophyoid mite, Asetadiptacus acarubri n. sp., is described and illustrated from Rubus fruticosus (Rosaceae) in Britain, a key to the world species of Asetadiptacus is provided, and Anthocoptes rubicolens Roivainen and Trimeroptes rubi Bagdasarian are recorded from Britain for the first time. In addition, Acalitus essigi (Hassan) and Phyllocoptes gracilis (Nalepa) are reported from R. fruticosus and Rubus sp., respectively. Collection details, distribution and host plant symptoms are provided, together with digital micrographs of the prodorsal shield and coxigenital region of a female from each species discussed. A review of the other eriophyoid mite species hitherto recorded in Britain from Rubus is also provided. Key words: Eriophyoidea, Eriophyidae, Diptilomiopidae, red berry disease, blackberry, taxonomy, pest, key Introduction The Food and Environment Research Agency (Fera) provides an identification service for plant pests and diseases for both the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and commercial customers. During 2009, eleven samples of Rubus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect Conditions in the United States 1966
    FOREST INSECT CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1966 FOREST SERVICE ' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Foreword This report is the 18th annual account of the scope, severity, and trend of the more important forest insect infestations in the United States, and of the programs undertaken to check resulting damage and loss. It is compiled primarily for managers of public and private forest lands, but has become useful to students and others interested in outbreak trends and in the location and extent of pest populations. The report also makes possible n greater awareness of the insect prob­ lem and of losses to the timber resource. The opening section highlights the more important conditions Nationwide, and each section that pertains to a forest region is prefaced by its own brief summary. Under the Federal Forest Pest Control Act, a sharing by Federal and State Governments the costs of surveys and control is resulting in a stronger program of forest insect and disease detection and evaluation surveys on non-Federal lands. As more States avail themselves of this financial assistance from the Federal Government, damage and loss from forest insects will become less. The screening and testing of nonpersistent pesticides for use in suppressing forest defoliators continued in 1966. The carbamate insecticide Zectran in a pilot study of its effectiveness against the spruce budworm in Montana and Idaho appeared both successful and safe. More extensive 'tests are planned for 1967. Since only the smallest of the spray droplets reach the target, plans call for reducing the spray to a fine mist. The course of the fine spray, resulting from diffusion and atmospheric currents, will be tracked by lidar, a radar-laser combination.
    [Show full text]