DOCSLIB.ORG

San Joaquin Council of Governments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Joaquin Council of Governments P1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SJCOG Conference Room 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 Thursday, August 9, 2018 10:00 A.M. Teleconference Number: 1-650-479-3208 Participant Code: 802 161 344 Attention Callers: Please mute the call unless speaking The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at (209) 235-0600 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. PARKING: For your convenience, parking is available at the COG Regional Center. There is additional parking available at Public Parking Lot K, located on American Street, just south of Weber Avenue. Additional meter parking is available on Weber Avenue. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order / Introductions / Roll Call 2. Minutes: June 14, 2018 3. Public Presentation At this time, the public may address the Technical Advisory Committee on any non-agendized item that is within the subject matter of this agency. If a member of the public wishes to speak on an agenda item he or she is invited to address the Technical Advisory Committee at the time the item is up for consideration. A five-minute maximum time limit for a speaker will apply to all “items from the audience”. The determination of whether an item is within the subject matter of the Committee is a discretionary decision to be made by the chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. 4. Technical Items: B through D are available for action by the committee. The left hand column identifies only recommendations from staff. Action A. Consent Calendar Items E through J. Action B. State Route 99/Turner Interchange Programming Recommendation - Ripperda Action C. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Jobs Balancing Investment Funding for Argonaut / Charter Way STAA Improvements – K. Anderson P2 Discussion D. Tri-Valley San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Update – Yokoyama CONSENT CALENDAR Action E. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) and Third Party Cost Estimate for FY 18/19 – Lacondeguy Information F. Valley Voice Annual Trip to Washington D.C. – Lacondeguy Information G. dibs Quarterly Activity Report: April – June, 2018 – Davis Information H. 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Notice of Determination (NOD) – K. Anderson Information I. Career Development and the Changing Workforce – August 21 Speaker Series Event – S. Anderson Action J. 2017-18 Final Local Transportation Fund Revenue and Apportionment Schedule - Dial 5. Other Matters of Business 6. Meeting Adjourned to Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. P3 AGENDA ITEM 2 P4 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E. Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 Thursday, June 14, 2018 MINUTES Present Member Name Jurisdiction Present Member Name Jurisdiction X Mike Selling SJC X John Andoh City of Escalon Dave Mendoza SJC X George Lorente SJRTD Eric Alvarez City of Stockton Juan Villanueva Port of Stockton X Wes Johnson City of Stockton Steven Martinez Caltrans D‐10 X Robin Borre City of Stockton X Josh Swearingen Caltrans D‐10 X Georgia Lantsberger City of Lodi Nicholas Fung Caltrans D‐10 Charles Swimley City of Lodi Daniel Krause SJRRC Greg Showerman City of Manteca John Cadrett SJVAPCD X Koosun Kim City of Manteca Russell Stark Stk. Metro Airport X Zabih Zaca City of Tracy X Ed Lovell City of Tracy X James Pease City of Ripon X Michael King City of Lathrop Alternates/Others: John Andoh, City of Manteca; Miguel Mendoza, City of Stockton; Johnny Chang, City of Stockton; Dennis Yep, City of Stockton; Lyman Chang, City of Lodi. SJCOG Staff: Diane Nguyen, Deputy Director; Nicole Gorham, Public Information Officer; Ryan Niblock; Senior Regional Planer; David Ripperda, Associate Regional Planer; Travis Yokoyama, Associate Regional Planer; Christine Corrales, Associate Regional Planer; Summer Anderson; Assistant Regional Planer; Michelle Lacondeguy, Assistant Regional Planer; Katy Castro, Administrative Clerk II; Joseph Benapfl, Intern. 1. Call Meeting to Order/Introductions: James Pease called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. and introductions were made. 2. Meeting minutes from May 10, 2018: It was moved/seconded (Selling/Lantsberger) to approve May 10, 2018, minutes. Mike Selling noted his comment regarding the service to Pleasanton Bart wasn’t on the minutes. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. 3. Public Presentation: None. 4. Technical Items for discussion: B through F CONSENT CALENDAR G. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) Capital Project List Amendments H. Short Range Transit Plan Guidelines I. Federal FY 2018/19 (FFY 19) FTA Section 5311 Program of Projects P5 Mike Selling asked that items G and H be pulled for discussion. Mr. Selling asked for clarification on the increase for the SR-120 at McKinley Avenue and I-205 at Mountain House/International Parkway projects. He asked for the reason behind the amendment. Diane Nguyen stated that is due to an updated cost estimate, and in case of one of the projects, the update was a $10 million increase. As a result, the cities wanted to get the latest cost estimates reflected to get a revised calculation of eligible RTIF amount. Mike Selling asked about the difference between the Regional Transit Systems Plan (RTSP) and the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). Diane Nguyen explained the SRTP applies to a short-range plan of the local transit operator. It is similar to a Capital Improvement Program for roads and streets as it is financially constrained and identifies capital and operating needs by the local operation. The RTSP is the COG’s planning document which compiles information from each transit operator’s individual SRTPs. John Andoh asked if all Short Range Transit Plans are due in Dec. 2018. Diane Nguyen stated Dec 2018 is a target deadline, as it is not expected or possible for everyone to update their plans by this exact date. She said if plans are updated within six months of this date, that would be reasonable to keep them consistent and relevant. It was moved/seconded (Selling/Andoh) to approve the consent calendar. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. B. Protecting SB 1: Nicole Gorham stated this is for action to oppose the SB 1 repeal effort. Ms. Gorham noted taking this action has no fiscal impact on the SJCOG, however, if SB 1 is repealed, $341,000 will be lost from the SJCOG Overall Work Program for planning activities. In addition, estimates anticipated at least $27 million a year in additional local road and street improvements throughout San Joaquin County. Should the SB 1 repeal be successful, the fiscal impact will be the loss of these funds as well as millions in competitive statewide funds. Mike Selling asked if SJCOG or other agencies have plans to educate the public. Ms. Gorham stated staff is planning on reaching out to the public but are waiting to see if the repeal will be on the November ballot. It was moved/seconded (Zaca/Borre) to approve support transportation funding from SB 1 and oppose the November 2018 ballot measure to repeal SB 1. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. C. 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP): Diane Nguyen presented this item and stated the four documents listed in the staff report; final PEIR, RTP/SCS, FTIP, and the Air Quality Conformity Analysis will be considered for adoption by the SJCOG Board on June 28, 2018. If adopted, the four documents will be posted to the SJCOG website and submitted to state and federal P6 agencies for review and approval. Ms. Nguyen stated the approval process typically takes several months. It was moved/seconded (Kim/Lantsberger) to recommend approval of the 2018 RTP/SCS and 2019 FTIP. The motion passed unanimously by voice vote. D. FY 2018/19 Unmet Transit Needs Findings: Diane Nguyen announced SJCOG staff recommendations are to (1) adopt Unmet Transit Needs Findings for San Joaquin County as a result of the FY 18-19 Unmet Transit Needs public outreach process. (2) Set aside $175,000 from the section 99313 regional portion of the FY 18/19 State Transit Assistance Program (re-apportioned from a current set-aside of $250,000 for Non- Emergency Medical Transportation) for weekend service from San Joaquin County to BART. (3) Support continued collaboration with RTD and the City of Tracy to develop a scope and funding strategy for service between Tracy, Mountain House, and Delta College. Funding sources that will be considered include the City of Tracy section 5307, City of Tracy Local Transportation Fund, Measure K, and other funding sources. SJCOG staff will return to the Board with a funding recommendation at a future date. Mike Selling asked what had changed that made transit to Mountain House “reasonable to meet” this year. Diane Nguyen stated that RTD, Tracy, and SJCOG were able to define several new concepts on how to provide service in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Mike Selling asked if service to Livermore is on a trial basis. Diane Nguyen stated it is anticipated that this will be an ongoing service. Mike Selling expressed his concerns about the additional recommended services being added to RTD and not having enough funds to fund the previous services. Ed Lovell said the City of Tracy is going through their Short Range Transit Plan and are making sure service is cost effective for everybody. John Andoh asked Mike Selling for clarification regarding the County’s LTF funding to RTD. Mike Selling stated it is to fund existing service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
    [Show full text]
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor
    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda I 680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    Alameda I-680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F 6-1-2020 6/24/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ..................................................... 1 1.3 Document Structure............................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Corridor Goals, Objectives and Performance Metrics ................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Corridor Overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Corridor Limits .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Route Significance ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Agenda Packet
    LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1362 Rutan Court, Suite 100 Livermore, CA 94551 PROJECTS and SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING / COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DAVID HAUBERT – CHAIR JEAN JOSEY – VICE CHAIR KARLA BROWN BOB WOERNER Agenda Questions: Please call the Executive Director at (925) 455-7564 or send an email to [email protected] Documents received after publication of the Agenda and considered by the P&S Committee in its deliberation will be available for inspection only via electronic document transfer, due to the COVID-19 outbreak. See the COVID-19 provisions outlined below. Please call or email the Executive Director during normal business hours if you require access to any such documents. TELECONFERENCE MAY 24, 2021 – 4:00 PM CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY AND MEETING PROCEDURE On June 5, 2020 (updated June 18, 2020), the Health Officer of Alameda County issued an Order that will continue to be in effect until it is rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer. The Order directed that all individuals living in the county to shelter at their place of residence except that they may leave to provide or receive certain essential services or engage in certain essential activities and work for essential businesses and governmental services. Under the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting may utilize teleconferencing. As a precaution to protect the health and safety of staff, officials, and the general public. Councilmembers will not be physically in attendance, but will be available via video conference. The administrative office of Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) is currently closed to the public and will remain closed for the duration of the Project & Services (P&S) Committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report
    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report May 20, 2021 ES-1 Final Report Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report Prepared by Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) May 20, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan envisions a network of high-speed, intercity corridor, and commuter trains integrated with local transit, providing nearly seamless connections for riders seeking to reach all parts of the state. In corridors where no trains operate, the Rail Plan calls for express buses using the existing highway systems to provide access to the state’s rail system. The Rail Plan identified the I-680 corridor between the Tri-Valley area (i.e. Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore) and Suisun City as one such corridor, where express buses could link a Tri-Valley Transit Hub with the Suisun-Fairfield Amtrak Station, a stop for the Capitol Corridor trains. This Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study is an effort to define what such express bus service would be: its route, stops, connections with corridor and commuter trains, as well as its likely ridership, revenue, and costs for implementation. The study investigates the BART Dublin/Pleasanton BART station as a candidate for the Tri-Valley Transit Hub, along with potential improvements that could make the facility easier, safer, and more comfortable for riders to use. The study also explores options to better connect northern San Joaquin County communities with the Tri-Valley Hub. The distance between the Suisun Amtrak Station and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station is 53 miles, inclusive of a stop at the Martinez Amtrak Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.7.3 Project Environmental Impact Report
    Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction The Tri-Valley–San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (Authority) is proposing the Valley Link Project, which is being evaluated on a project level in this Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR). This chapter provides a brief overview of the Proposed Project and alternatives; the Project goals and objectives; Project background and context; an overview of the environmental review process; and the scope, content, and organization of the Draft EIR. Figure 1-1. Valley Link Project Geographic Segments 1.2 Project Overview 1.2.1 Proposed Project The Proposed Project is a new 42-mile, 7-station passenger rail project that will connect the existing Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station in Alameda County to the approved Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) North Lathrop Station in San Joaquin County (Figure 1-1). Valley Link will use existing transportation corridors: the existing Interstate (I-) 580 corridor (11.7 miles) in the Tri-Valley; the Alameda County Transportation Corridor right-of-way (ROW) through the Altamont Pass (14.5 miles); and the existing Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Corridor (16.1 miles) in Northern San Joaquin County. The Proposed Project includes the following stations: ⚫ Dublin/Pleasanton (BART Intermodal) Valley Link Draft EIR 1-1 December 2020 ICF 00004.19 Tri-Valley – San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Introduction ⚫ Isabel (Livermore) ⚫ Greenville (Livermore) ⚫ Mountain House (San Joaquin County) ⚫ Downtown Tracy Station (Tracy) ⚫ River Islands Station (Lathrop) ⚫ North Lathrop Station (ACE Intermodal) The Proposed Project also includes the proposed Tracy Operation and Maintenance Facility (OMF), which would be located in the City of Tracy.
    [Show full text]
  • New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations
    New BART Service to Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations Comments and Feedback Please answer the questions below. Your answers will help us evaluate how well we’re reaching the communities we serve. BART values your input. Information will be treated confidentially. USAGE OF BART (Optional) Do you have any comments on any of the options listed in questions 7-8? 1. Which BART station do you usually enter when making a trip from __________________________________________________________ your home (i.e., your “home” station)? __________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 2. At which BART station do you usually exit the system (i.e., your __________________________________________________________ “destination” station)? ____________________________________________________ PROPOSED BART FARES FOR MILPITAS AND BERRYESSA/NORTH SAN 3. What time of day do you typically use BART? Select all that apply. JOSÉ STATIONS Morning Afternoon Evening Late night 9. BART plans to extend its distance-based fare structure for 4. Do you plan to use the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Stations. For example, in Station? Select all that apply. 2018, a one-way trip to Embarcadero Station from Warm Yes, Milpitas Station Springs/South Fremont Station will cost $6.75, while a trip to Yes, Berryessa/North San José Station Embarcadero Station from Milpitas Station is estimated to cost Neither, I plan to use: ___________________ $7.50 ($0.75 more), and from Berryessa/North San José Station, $7.75 ($1.00 more). Do you have any general comments about 5. How will you access the Milpitas and/or Berryessa/North San José BART’s proposed fares for Milpitas and Berryessa/North San José Station? Select all that apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information Dublin/ Pleasanton Station
    Transit For more detailed information about BART Information service, please see the BART schedule, MODESTO AREA EXPRESS BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. 4K DP Dublin/ San Francisco Bay Area Schedule Information e ective March 22, 2021 Amtrak Thruway bus service County Connection (CCCTA) Schedule Information e ective October 4, 2020 Modesto Area Express (MAX) San Joaquin RTD is the regional is a system of intercity coaches, provides xed-route bus and is the primary bus agency for transit provider for San Joaquin Rapid Transit (BART) rail Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are service connects the San locally-contracted transit buses, paratransit services throughout Modesto. The agency provides County and provides public Pleasanton available on www.bart.gov and the offi cial BART app. Route 35 Route 97X Route 335 Francisco Peninsula with through-ticketed local bus routes, Central Contra Costa County. For regular transit and dial-a-ride local transit services in the Stockton Overhead real-time displays can be found on station and taxi services that provides passengers more information call 925-676-7500 service in addition to commuter feeder Metropolitan Area, as well as intercity, Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, to to to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, platforms. A reference guide to transfer information of Amtrak’s rail service with connecting or visit www.countyconnection.com service to several regional rail systems: interregional, and rural transit services Station San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ San Ramon TC/ BART, ACE, and Amtrak’s San Joaquin train. countywide. and other cities in the East Bay, as for trains without direct service is shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum 5.1 11
    Memorandum 5.1 11 DATE: September 4, 2020 TO: Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee FROM: Tess Lengyel, Executive Director Carolyn Clevenger, Deputy Executive Director of Planning and Policy SUBJECT: Approve Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority Request for a 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan Amendment Recommendation It is recommended that the Commission approve the Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority (TVSJVRRA) request (Attachment A) for an amendment to the 2014 Measure BB Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) to: 1) acknowledge TVSJVRRA as a new agency in Alameda County that can be an eligible recipient of Measure BB funds; 2) remove the BART to Livermore project and associated $400 million Measure BB funding; 3) add Valley Link in Alameda County project with $400 million in Measure BB funding; and 4) make associated technical amendments. The Commission Plan Amendment Resolution recommended for approval is included as Attachment B and the proposed 2014 Measure BB Expenditure Plan redline markups and technical amendments are detailed in Attachment C. This is an action item and requires majority approval at the Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee (PPLC) and 2/3 of the Authorized vote for approval at the Commission meeting per the Implementing Guidelines of the 2014 TEP. Summary The 2014 Measure BB TEP included $400 million for BART to Livermore. Since that time, a significant number of developments have occurred on the project and in the project area, as detailed in the Project Background section of this memo. The TVSJVRRA was created by the State Legislature in 2017 by Assembly Bill 758 for the purposes of planning, developing and delivering cost-effective and responsive transit connectivity between BART and commuter rail service in the Tri-Valley and San Joaquin County that reflects regional consensus and meets the goals and objectives of the San Joaquin Valley and Tri- Valley communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 5-2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Shishir Mathur. "Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2019). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project 1714 May 2019 Value Capture to Fund Public Transportation: The Impact of Warm Springs BART Station on the Value of Neighboring Residential Properties in Fremont, CA Shishir Mathur, Ph.D. MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE transweb.sjsu.edu MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF Hon. Norman Y. Mineta Mineta Consortium for Transportation Mobility MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES Founded in 1991, the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI), an organized research and training unit in partnership with the Founder, Honorable Norman Richard Anderson (Ex-Officio) Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Dan Smith (TE 2020) Lucas College and Graduate School of Business at San José State University (SJSU), increases mobility for all by improving the safety, Mineta (Ex-Officio) President and CEO Executive Director President Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Metropolitan Transportation Capstone Financial Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Special Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Doug Kuehne, City of Lodi Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING Call-In Information: 1 (408) 650-3123 Conference Access Code: 254-860-229 GoToMeeting Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing 1 (408) 650-3123 with access code: 254-860-229 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://www.gotomeet.me/acerail/sjrrc-july-special-board-meeting. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
    [Show full text]