DOCSLIB.ORG

Defending Love Claire Barber and Kate Doherty Senior Division Performance Process Paper Word Count: 494

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defending Love Claire Barber and Kate Doherty Senior Division Performance Process Paper Word Count: 494 Defending Love Claire Barber and Kate Doherty Senior Division Performance Process Paper Word Count: 494 1 Our National History Day topic is centered around the Loving vs. Virginia court case which abolished anti-miscegenation laws throughout the United States. We chose this topic because of its proximity to where we live with Claire living on the border between Bowling Green and Caroline County and Kate living in downtown Fredericksburg both close to the Lovings’ residence in Caroline County. We feel honored to locally have such a monumental case. We began our research at the University of Mary Washington’s Simpson Library. We were able to find law books that discussed the changes in the law during this time. Additionally, we saw how many people wrote first-hand accounts of the discrimination that those in interracial marriages faced before and after the ruling. It was really fun finding different means of collecting information as well, including an interview with the Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney for the city of Fredericksburg. At first, we were disappointed that the UMW library did not have the physical Free Lance-Star newspapers for the year of 1967, but we were informed that they had been converted to microfilm, which was challenging for us. As two teenagers who had never even heard of microfilm and it took trial and error to learn how to load the machine and in the end, use it. To gain more insight into the personal aspects of the case, we tried to get in contact with Bernard Cohen, one of the original lawyers on the Lovings’ case, who still lives in Fredericksburg. This led us to a woman named Adele Uphaus who is a reporter with our local newspaper, the Free Lance-Star and has published a number of articles about Mr. Cohen. She said that because of his health we could not interview him, but in turn, she recommended we talk to Philip Hirschkop, another lawyer on the case who still practices law in Northern Virginia. After an hour-long conversation with him, we both felt like we knew Mr. Hirschkop and the case on a deeper level. This impacted our medium for the project moving forward. We were going back and forth on whether we wanted to do a website or a performance. We already had experience making websites, so we wanted to try something new. We both really enjoy performing in our school’s musicals and wanted to show history in a new light. By choosing this medium, it allowed us to share the emotional aspects that went into being a part of this case outside of the cinema portrayals of the Lovings. It gave us the ability to showcase how eloquent and passionate Philip Hirschkop was when speaking to us about this case as well. The Loving vs. Virginia case broke barriers because it transformed the way the public responded to relationships between people of mixed races. It took time for society to accept it, but without the help of Mr. Hirschkop and Mr. Cohen, it would not have been legalized so soon and so famously. 2 Claire Barber Kate Doherty National History Day 2020 Senior Division Fredericksburg Academy Defending Love Picture of the Set and Props 3 Props: Two coffee cups Stack of files labeled with “Loving” Constitutional Law books Rotary phone Two pens Period table Period Waterford pineapple lamp Two period chairs Setting: A small wooden and white lacquer conference table is in the center of the stage. Along either side, there are two wooden chairs. The table has a few file folders strewn about along with period law books. At each place setting sits a yellow legal pad, metal pen, and coffee cup. The characters sip from the cups periodically throughout the scene. In the center of the table, there is a phone that is to be used later on in the scene. Behind the phone there is a pineapple lamp with the light turned on. Actors: Claire Barber - Philip Hirschkop and Narrator (via recording) Kate Doherty - Bernard Cohen and Mrs. Mildred Loving (via recording) [ Bernard Cohen is seated in a chair on stage left. He is frozen in a stance in which he appears to be writing notes on the yellow legal pad on the table in front of him. Philip Hirschkop is off stage right.] NARRATOR In 1958, Richard and Mildred Loving were married in the District of Columbia because their interracial marriage was illegal in the state of Virginia where they were from. After their nuptials, the couple made their home in Caroline County, VA. They lived peacefully until one night while the Lovings were sleeping, police entered their home and arrested them. They were then tried and sentenced to not being allowed to return to Virginia together for 25 years. [ The scene unfreezes. Philip enters into the scene miming a door opening. Bernard stands to greet him and shakes hands and mouths greetings. The interaction ends with them both seated on their respective sides of the table continuing to mouth a conversation while jotting down notes and drinking from their white cups. The narrator continues...] This brings us to June 11th, 1967. Philip Hirschkop and Bernard Cohen, the Lovings’ defense attorneys, have convened to discuss the proceedings of the case and inform the couple about the trial and its path to the Supreme Court of the United States. Philip Hirschkop was brought into 4 the proceedings after the case turned from being a federal case to a civil case. Eventually, the two young lawyers saw the case all the way through to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Loving vs. Virginia case broke barriers by abolishing anti-miscegenation laws and creating social change throughout the United States of America which could not have been possible without the determination of these two young lawyers. PHILIP [ Leaning back in his chair slightly and tapping the pen on the legal pad. ] We really have a case here. It’s been pretty procedural so far, but now that we’re going to the Supreme Court, this action is really starting to make some noise. BERNARD I didn’t think we would be able to appeal all of the way to the Supreme Court. Especially with how it started, being a federal case and all. PHILIP True, we were never supposed to get this far. It was intended to just be a reduction of sentence. Not to mention Naim vs. Naim, a similar case, was dismissed ten years ago. I’m actually surprised that the ACLU let us stay on the job considering how young we are. BERNARD [ Leaning elbows on the table and angling body inward. ] Well, this certainly isn’t a clean case, they broke the law by coming back to Virginia before their twenty-five-year sentence was up. [ Tapping pen to temple as if remembering something.] By the way, we have to send off the letter requesting your presence in the Supreme court. You have not been out of law school for the required amount of years. I want you to deliver the opening statement because you are more seasoned in civil law. PHILIP Oh, thank you. [ Philip excitedly stands with the legal pad and pen in his hand, showing his age. ] We should bring up the lack of due process and the equal protection clause. [ Small laugh. ] We are almost lucky that our first judge was racist because it helps to solidify our argument. What was it he said? [ Tapping pen to paper as if searching for the quote. ] "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause 5 for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix." [ Philip sits confidently. ] This could be a great example of the racially fueled bias that we have already faced and may continue to face in courts that are supposed to be impartial. [ Jots this down on paper. ] BERNARD That’s really good. This will be the first time that you have had a major case like this that will progress to the Supreme Court. [ Leaning back in the chair, arms and legs crossed.] I suppose you are happy you signed onto this case? With it escalating and all? PHILIP I don’t know. [ Beat.] The first time I ever met Mr. and Mrs. Loving I instantly felt the urge to help them. The moment I exchanged my first words with Mildred, I could tell she was just a wonderful human being. From the way she interacted with her kids to the quiet strength she has possessed throughout this whole process. [ Beat.] They valued their family so much that they would rather break the law than move somewhere where their marriage is legal and have to leave their family behind. It makes me want to work even harder because these good people don’t deserve to go to the penitentiary for five years without a fight. [ Phone rings. Bernard nods to Philip signaling he can take the call. Bernard picks up the phone. ] BERNARD Hello? MRS. LOVING [ Recording plays. ] Hi Mr. Cohen, this is Mildred, Mildred Loving. [ Beat.] I was wondering about the changes in our case and how it is moving along? BERNARD Hi Mrs. Loving. 6 [ Said loudly while nodding to Philip to indicate who is on the phone. ] Yes, Mr. Hirschkop and I are actually discussing your case right now. We are going to appeal with the use of due process and the equal protection clause to support your case and hopefully get the court to provide you closure and justice for both of your hardships.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Struggle for Worker Rights in EGYPT AREPORTBYTHESOLIDARITYCENTER
    67261_SC_S3_R1_Layout 1 2/5/10 6:58 AM Page 1 I JUSTICE I JUSTICE for ALL for I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I “This timely and important report about the recent wave of labor unrest in Egypt, the country’s largest social movement ALL The Struggle in more than half a century, is essential reading for academics, activists, and policy makers. It identifies the political and economic motivations behind—and the legal system that enables—the government’s suppression of worker rights, in a well-edited review of the country’s 100-year history of labor activism.” The Struggle for Worker Rights Sarah Leah Whitson Director, Middle East and North Africa Division, Human Rights Watch I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I for “This is by far the most comprehensive and detailed account available in English of the situation of Egypt’s working people Worker Rights today, and of their struggles—often against great odds—for a better life. Author Joel Beinin recounts the long history of IN EGYPT labor activism in Egypt, including lively accounts of the many strikes waged by Egyptian workers since 2004 against declining real wages, oppressive working conditions, and violations of their legal rights, and he also surveys the plight of A REPORT BY THE SOLIDARITY CENTER women workers, child labor and Egyptian migrant workers abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources
    Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Bledsoe, John T, photographer. Little Rock, 1959. Rally at state capitol. 20 Aug. 1959. Retrieved ​ ​ from the Library of Congress, <www.loc.gov/item/2009632339/>. This is a picture of a rally that took place during the Civil Rights movement. This picture helped my project because it helped show what was going on during the Civil Rights movement, which the Lovings and their case were a part of. “Celebrate.” Celebrate | Loving Day, www.lovingday.org/celebrate.; “About Loving Day.” ​ ​ About Loving Day | Loving Day, www.lovingday.org/about. ​ This website gave a good picture of the volunteers for Loving Day. It will go on to the slider image part of the website on the “Lovings’ Legacy” page. This picture was taken after a CBS news report on Loving Day. This site is reliable because it came from the official Loving Day website. This source also gave a picture to put on the Lovings’ Legacy page on our website. The picture is of people celebrating Loving Day. This picture is important because it shows that no matter what color, people can still get along with each other. This source is reliable because it is from the Loving Day official website. Cohen, Bernard. Interview by Michele Norris. All Things Considered: The Loving Decision 40 ​ Years of Legal Interracial Unions: NPR, 11 June 2007. ​ https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10889047 This is a news segment by NPR. I used part of an interview that was included in this news segment. This helped the project because it provided Bernard Cohen speaking about how the Lovings reacted to hearing that their case would likely go to the Supreme Court of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium Fifty Years of Loving V. Virginia and the Continued Pursuit of Racial Equality Foreword
    SYMPOSIUM FIFTY YEARS OF LOVING V. VIRGINIA AND THE CONTINUED PURSUIT OF RACIAL EQUALITY FOREWORD R.A. Lenhardt,* Tanya K. Hernández** & Kimani Paul-Emile*** INTRODUCTION It has been ten years since this journal last published a volume exploring Loving v. Virginia,1 the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1967 decision invalidating antimiscegenation laws on equal protection and due process grounds.2 In that time, the American public has been treated to a virtual smorgasbord of new opportunities to love Loving. First, in a way few could have imagined fifty years ago when seventeen states criminalized interracial marriages,3 that decision has provided the impetus for a “global network” of celebrations designed to praise interracial relationships and families and to combat discrimination.4 Families and couples now gather annually in communities * Professor of Law and Faculty Director, Center on Race, Law and Justice, Fordham University School of Law. ** Archibald R. Murray Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law. *** Associate Professor Law, Fordham University School of Law. This conference would not have been possible without the assistance of a network of people. We are very grateful to Amanda Gottlieb, Julia MacAllister, Adam Minchew, Catherine Tremble, and others at the Fordham Law Review for their hard work in connection with this Symposium. We also extend special thanks to Tomas Barron for excellent research assistance and to Carrie Johnson, Shanelle Holley, and Rob Yasharian for their hard work in publicizing and handling the many details involved in making an event of this sort successful. Finally, we express our gratitude to Dean Matthew Diller for his support and, of course, extend thanks to the talented scholars who, by participating in the conversations facilitated by this conference, deepened our collective understanding of Loving v.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography
    Annotated Bibliography Primary Sources Images “Application for Marriage.” Smithsonian Magazine, 24 May 1958, ​ ​ www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/historic-loving-decision-marriage-license-display -180960323/. Accessed 6 Feb. 2020. The image of the application for a marriage license was used in "The Loving's Fight to Love" section of our project. It was in the project as it represents the legal status of their marriage. “Bowling Green, Built 1830 with Additions in 1907 and 1970.” Courthouse History, 2016, ​ ​ courthousehistory.com/gallery/states/virginia/counties/caroline. Accessed 13 Feb. 2020. This primary source image of the courthouse in Virginia is used in the "The Loving's Fight to Love" section of our project. It shows where the Lovings court case was first argued, and the decision made that the Lovings would be banished from Virginia for breaking the Virginia law, which said that an interracial couple could not marry in another location and return to Virginia. Johnson, Stefanie. “Blocking Racial Intermarriage Laws in 1935 and 1937: Seattle’s First Civil Rights Coalition - Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project.” Depts.Washington.Edu, 2004, depts.washington.edu/civilr/antimiscegenation.htm. ​ Images of primary source newspaper headlines denouncing interracial marriages in the Washington state during the mid-1900s were found from this website to enhance our student composed text on the “Laying the Foundation” page. From these headlines, you can see that interracial marriage was a controversial issue all over the United States. Library of Virginia. “Registration of Birth and Color,” Library of Virginia, 1924, ​ ​ edu.lva.virginia.gov/online_classroom/shaping_the_constitution/doc/birth_registration.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Photography: the Research Library of the Mack Lee
    THE HISTORY OF PHOTOGRAPHY The Research Library of the Mack Lee Gallery 2,633 titles in circa 3,140 volumes Lee Gallery Photography Research Library Comprising over 3,100 volumes of monographs, exhibition catalogues and periodicals, the Lee Gallery Photography Research Library provides an overview of the history of photography, with a focus on the nineteenth century, in particular on the first three decades after the invention photography. Strengths of the Lee Library include American, British, and French photography and photographers. The publications on French 19th- century material (numbering well over 100), include many uncommon specialized catalogues from French regional museums and galleries, on the major photographers of the time, such as Eugène Atget, Daguerre, Gustave Le Gray, Charles Marville, Félix Nadar, Charles Nègre, and others. In addition, it is noteworthy that the library includes many small exhibition catalogues, which are often the only publication on specific photographers’ work, providing invaluable research material. The major developments and evolutions in the history of photography are covered, including numerous titles on the pioneers of photography and photographic processes such as daguerreotypes, calotypes, and the invention of negative-positive photography. The Lee Gallery Library has great depth in the Pictorialist Photography aesthetic movement, the Photo- Secession and the circle of Alfred Stieglitz, as evidenced by the numerous titles on American photography of the early 20th-century. This is supplemented by concentrations of books on the photography of the American Civil War and the exploration of the American West. Photojournalism is also well represented, from war documentary to Farm Security Administration and LIFE photography.
    [Show full text]
  • May 5-11, 2017
    CALENDAR LISTING GUIDELINES •Tolist an eventinPasa Week,sendanemail or press release to [email protected] or [email protected]. •Send material no less than twoweeks prior to the desired publication date. •For each event, provide the following information: time,day,date, venue/address,ticket prices,web address,phone number,and brief description of event(15 to 20 words). •All submissions arewelcome; however, events areincluded in Pasa Week as spaceallows. Thereisnocharge forlistings. • Returnofphotos and other materialscannot be guaranteed. • Pasatiempo reserves the righttopublish received information and photographs on The NewMexican's website. ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CALENDAR •Toadd your eventtoThe New Mexican online calendar,visit santafenewmexican.com and click on the Calendar tab. May5-11, 2017 •For further information contactPamela Beach: [email protected], 202 E. MarcySt., Santa Fe,NM87501, phone: 505-986-3019. CALENDAR COMPILED BY PAMELA BEACH FRIDAY 5/5 Traveler’s Market DeVargas Center, 153-B Paseo de Peralta, Galleryand Museum Openings 505-988-7997 ASea in the DesertGallery Textile Fiestas of Mexico,folk-artexhibit and sale; 836-ACanyonRd.,505-988-9140 5:30 p.m. slide presentation of Textile Fiestas of Forthe Birds,watercolors by Teri Caputo; Mexico... ATraveler’s Guide to Celebrations,Markets, reception 5-7 p.m.; through June 5. and SmartShopping by author SheriBrautigam. Blue Rain Gallery True West of Santa Fe 544 S. Guadalupe St., 505-954-9902 130-F Lincoln Ave.,505-982-0055 New Visions,group show; reception 5-7 p.m.; Paintings by Gary David Suazoand jewelry through May20. by Jacqueline Gala and Michael and Cassandra Dukepoo; reception 5-7 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Etudes Tutorials Learn to Work in an Online Classroom at WLAC
    Etudes Tutorials Learn to Work in an Online Classroom at WLAC: If you have never worked inside an online classroom at WLAC, please learn how to (a) equip your computer with the correct browser and (b) work inside our online classroom. 1. Go to www.myetudes.org. 2. In the left menu, click on Course Login Info. 3. Scroll down the screen to the tutorials. 4. View/read the tutorials, as appropriate. Instructor & Class Information Course: English 21, Section 8034 Semester: Spring 2016, February 8 - June 6, 2016 Instructor Name: Nuala Lincke-Ivic, Associate Professor Instructor E-Mail: [email protected] Class Hours & Location: Online Office Location, Hours & Telephone: My office is in the General Classroom Building, in 210-D. My office hours are from 1:00 - 3:00 PM on Mondays and Wednesdays. My telephone number is (310) 287-4544. The fastest way to reach me is by using Private Messages, and I do ask that you contact me only in Private Messages, not by my college email, as we need to keep all class business inside the online classroom. Privacy Issue: Please NEVER use a public forum like Questions or a discussion to write about private business that just involves the two of us; please use Private Messages. We use Questions to ask general questions about assignments; we use the discussions for class discussions about paper topics. About This English 21 Class ... ! W E L C O M E What is your aim in this class, as the teacher? Actually, I have two aims. First, I want to help you to help yourself become academically successful--so much so that you "jump over" English 28 next semester and enroll in English 101, College Reading and Composition I-- which is the first transfer-level English course.
    [Show full text]
  • Loving V. Virginia, Filmmakers Nancy Buirski and Elisabeth Haviland James Bring That Story to Life Again
    CLASSROOM TOOLS A Teacher’s Guide Grades 6-12 “THE LOVING STORY” IS AN HBO DOCUMENTARY FILMS PRESENTATION OF AN AUGUSTA FILMS PRODUCTION SUPPORTED BY THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES. THE TEACHING GUIDE IS PRODUCED BY TEACHING TOLERANCE, A PROJECT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AUGUSTA FILMS AND HBO. PHOTO BY GREY VILLET. TEACHING TOLERANCE CONTENTS Introduction . 3 Objectives . 4 Meeting Standards . 5 LESSON 1 Their Place in History . 8 LESSON 2 The Question of Rights . 12 LESSON 3 The Legal Process . 15 LESSON 4 The Power of Activists . 19 Acknowledgments . 23 About Us . .. 24 TEACHER’S GUIDE • THE LOVING STORY 2 TEACHING TOLERANCE PHOTO BY GREY VILLET INTRODUCTION There are people among us who make things happen . We see pictures of them in our heads . They are the ones who organize and march and make impassioned speeches that often move the ball forward, when forward seems the best direction to go . But progress is also made be- cause of other people . Some are patient and persistent . They know that the road will be long, and that they may not benefit personally when the goal is finally reached . Still others, such as Richard and Mildred Loving, approach progress from a personal need—eventually seeing their victory affecting others as well . The Lovings did not see themselves as activists . They were a quiet married couple—he was white, she was black and Native American—living in the Virginia countryside . They were not involved in the events of the civil rights movement . Until they were roused from their bed by flashlight-bearing policemen and banished from the state, they were not likely to become symbols of that fight .
    [Show full text]
  • LOVING Vs. VIRGINIA
    TEACHER GUIDE Two teenagers fell in love. Their life together broke the law. But their determination would change it. LOVING vs. VIRGINIA A DOCUMENTARY NOVEL OF THE LANDMARK CIVIL RIGHTS CASE By PATRICIA HRUBY POWELL Artwork by SHADRA STRICKLAND 978-1-4521-2590-9 • $21.99 HC 978-1-4521-5331-5 • $15.99 E-book Ages 12 and up * • F&P Text Level Gradient: Z+ Lexile® Measure: HL720L � ABOUT THIS BOOK AND TEACHER GUIDE � My hand shakes a little When I sign When she signs my name. her name I smile at her. Does he really love me? The sheriff— The government— can’t tell me who I can marry. Or who I can’t marry. In 1955, in Caroline County, Virginia, amidst segregation and prejudice, injustice and cruelty, two teenagers fell in love. Their life together broke the law. But their determination would change it. Richard and Mildred Loving were at the heart of a landmark Supreme Court case that legalized marriage between the races. This documentary verse novel of the landmark 1967 Civil Rights case, Loving vs. Virginia, tells the story of Richard and Mildred Loving. Photographs, primary source documents, quotes, and illustrations by Shadra Strickland provide context and detail. This guide contains supplementary multimodal activities along with historical research and writing projects to accompany the book. � PRE-READING ACTIVITIES � The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow Suggested resource: The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow, PBS From the PBS website: “Emancipation ended slavery, but not its legacy. The Jim Crow era was one of struggle – not only for the victims of violence, discrimination, and poverty, but by those who worked to challenge (or promote) segregation in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Loving V. Virginia
    Loving v. Virginia Taking a Stand for Marriage Aliyah Hamlin Junior Division Individual Exhibit Student composed words on exhibit- 498 Process Paper - 490 Process Paper One of my main interests is black history and the Civil Rights movement. My love for this steered me in the direction to do a project about a Civil Rights Supreme Court case. When my class was first introduced to History Day, my teacher showed us a list of previous topics. I was looking down the list and saw Loving v. Virginia. I asked my teacher about it and he ​ ​ explained that it was about an interracial couple. It was perfect because my parents are an interracial couple and I never knew it was illegal to marry a different race. Making a connection to my topic would be more meaningful to me. Doing the research for the Lovings was tough because they were not well-known. My own parents did not know about this until I did this project. I utilized the Library of Virginia. This had many newspapers, documents, photos, and other various resources on the Loving’s court case. While researching, I came across the transcript and the two-hour long oral argument ​ ​ given by the Supreme Court in 1967. Some of my most reliable sources originated from the Loving’s personal photographer, Grey Villet. I came across an amazing book, Virginia Hasn’t ​ Always Been for Lovers, that had court documents, arrest records, interracial laws in states, ​ pictures, and gave good details on the Loving’s story. I was also able to interview Philip J.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    Contact: Communications Team 212.857.0045 [email protected] media release The Loving Story: Photographs by Grey Villet On view from January 20, 2012 through May 6, 2012 Media Preview January 19, 2011 11:30 am–1:30 pm RSVP: [email protected] 212.857.0045 Grey Villet, [Richard and Mildred Loving with their children Peggy, Donald, and Sidney in their living room, King and Queen County, Virginia], 1965. © Estate of Grey Villet The Loving Story: Photographs by Grey Villet, on view at the International Center of Photography (1133 Avenue of the Americas at 43rd Street) January 20 – May 6, 2012, presents a series of intimate photographs showing the love and unguarded emotions shared by Richard and Mildred Loving, a shy, nonpolitical married couple whose landmark United States Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia overturned the country’s anti- miscegenation laws. The exhibition, organized by Assistant Curator of Collections Erin Barnett, includes some twenty vintage prints by Grey Villet drawn from Villet’s estate and the Loving family. An HBO documentary The Loving Story, directed by veteran photo editor and filmmaker Nancy Buirski, inspired a stronger look at Villet’s legacy and his intimate images of the Lovings. In the film, his images become a narrative tool that underscores Villet’s personal approach to the couple’s story. The film debuts February 14, 2012. The photographs focus not on the epic legal battle surrounding this groundbreaking Civil Rights case, but instead show the Lovings’s dedication to each other and their family, and their daily life in the Virginia countryside they cherished.
    [Show full text]
  • Fordham Law Review Foreword
    Fordham Law Review Volume 86 Issue 6 Article 1 2018 Foreword Robin A. Lenhardt Fordham University School of Law Tanya K. Hernandez Fordham University School of Law Kimani Paul-Emile Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Family Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Robin A. Lenhardt, Tanya K. Hernandez, and Kimani Paul-Emile, Foreword, 86 Fordham L. Rev. 2625 (2018). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol86/iss6/1 This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYMPOSIUM FIFTY YEARS OF LOVING V. VIRGINIA AND THE CONTINUED PURSUIT OF RACIAL EQUALITY FOREWORD R.A. Lenhardt,* Tanya K. Hernández** & Kimani Paul-Emile*** INTRODUCTION It has been ten years since this journal last published a volume exploring Loving v. Virginia,1 the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1967 decision invalidating antimiscegenation laws on equal protection and due process grounds.2 In that time, the American public has been treated to a virtual smorgasbord of new opportunities to love Loving. First, in a way few could have imagined fifty years ago when seventeen states criminalized interracial marriages,3 that decision has provided the impetus for a “global network” of celebrations designed to praise interracial relationships and families and to combat discrimination.4 Families and couples now gather annually in communities * Professor of Law and Faculty Director, Center on Race, Law and Justice, Fordham University School of Law.
    [Show full text]