DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport and Logistics in Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport and Logistics in Croatia Transport and Logistics in Croatia Belgian Trade Office C R O A T I A Zagreb, 2010 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 Executive Summary This research intends to show what the current position of Croatia is in terms of transport and logistics. As it is known, Croatia became independent in 1991, and since that time all its efforts have been focused in reconstructing the country. These efforts are most reflected in the level of development reached currently in all economic sectors. The transport sector counts for 8% of the total GDP of Croatia. There are three main branches: ground, water and air transport. They differ from each other in many aspects). Ground transportation has also two branches: road transport (cars, buses and public transportation) and railroad transport. The road transport is highly developed and almost all the roads meet the European Union Standards and safety measures. The roads are safe and reach all the parts of Croatia. Railroad sector is poorly developed and there are still huge infrastructure lacks. A lot of work can be done in this sector in order to reach better standards. Water transport is one of the most important activities in the country and one of the crucial activities in the general economy. Water transport includes sea ports, transport in river and pipelines. Croatia has 3 big main ports that are very important for foreign investment: Rijeka, Split and Ploče. Air transport is not much used, but good enough to meet the requirements of the country. Most visitors come with their own car of by railroad or bus. Air cargo only represents an insignificant part of all other entering goods.. The national air company is Croatia Airlines (www.croatiaairlines.com), and it has all the market in Croatia. There are some low cost airlines flying to and from Croatia, but mostly on a seasonal base. In the field of logistics, Croatia has no development; this is a new business for the country. Educational framework is not defined and there is no training in this field. C R O A T I A 2 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 Index Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………2 1. CROATIA OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………………..6 2. ECONOMY………………………………………………………………………………7 2.1 Related Links……………………………………………………………………7 3. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………8 4. TRANSPORT SECTOR OVERVIEW……………………………………………………..8 4.1 Related Links…………………………………………………………………..11 5. REGULATION DEPENDENCIES OF CROATIA………………………………………13 AIR TRANSPORT ………………………………………………………………………………………….14 6. AIRPORTS……………………………………………………………………………….15 6.1 General Statistics……………………………………………………………..15 6.2 Main Airports…………………………………………………………………..16 6.2.1 Zagreb Airport……………………………………………………………16 6.2.2 Split Airport ………………………………………………………………18 6.2.3 Rijeka Airport ……………………………………………………………18 6.2.4 Osijek Airport…………………………………………………………….18 6.2.5 Zadar Airport ……………………………………………………………18 6.2.6 Dubrovnik Airport ………………………………………………………18 6.2.7 Pula Airport ……………………………………………………………...19 6.2.8 Brač Airport ……………………………………………………………..19 6.3 Related Links…………………………………………………………………..19 GROUND TRANSPORT…………………………………………………………………………………20 7. RAIL TRANSPORT………………………………………………………………………21 7.1 Statistics………………………………………………………………………...27 7.2 Dobova-Tovarnik line (International corridor X…………………………27 7.3 Ogulin-Knin line……………………………………………………………….28 7.4 International corridor V……………………………………………………...29 7.5 The Vinkovci-Osijek line……………………………………………………...29 7.6 The "Unska pruga" route…………………………………………………….29 7.7 Network connection problems……………………………………………30 7.8 Power Systems………………………………………………………………...30 7.9 Ecological Railways………………………………………………………….30 8. ROAD TRANSPORT…………………………………………………………………….31 8.1 Croatian National Report of Transportation…………………………….32 8.2 Road Rules……………………………………………………………………..33 8.3 Vehicle Registration Plates of Croatia…………………………………..33 C R O A T I A 3 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 8.4 City codes……………………………………………………………………..34 8.5 Motorways and Expressways……………………………………………… 35 8.5.1 Toll ………………………………………………………………………….35 8.5.2 Non-cash toll payment ………………………………………………..36 8.6 Motorway A1 …………………………………………………………………37 8.7 Other motorways …………………………………………………………….37 8.8 Roads Under Construction …………………………………………………39 8.9 Major Roads …………………………………………………………………..40 8.10 Minor Roads …………………………………………………………………..40 8.11 Bus Traffic………………………………………………………………………40 WATER TRANSPORT …………………………………………………………………………………..42 9. SEA TRANSPORT……………………………………………………………………….43 9.1 Ports …………………………………………………………………………….44 9.1.1 Rijeka Port…………………………………………………………………48 a) Traffic Position…………………………………………………………………………48 b) Development…………………………………………………………………………50 c) Rijeka Gateway Project…………………………………………………………… 51 d) Additional Projects for Rijeka’s Port ……………………………………………...51 d.1) Container and RO-RO terminal………………………………………………………52 d.2) General cargo terminal ……………………………………………………………….52 d.3) Inland warehouses ……………………………………………………………………..53 d.4) Frigo terminal…………………………………………………………………………….53 d.5) Timber terminal…………………………………………………………………………..53 e) Rijeka’s Port Terminals……………………………………………………………….53 e.1) Cereal Terminal………………………………………………………………………….53 e.2) Frigo Terminal ……………………………………………………………………………55 e.3) General Cargo Terminal ………………………………………………………………55 e.4) Timber Terminal ………………………………………………………………………….55 e.5) Container and RO-RO Terminal ……………………………………………………..55 e.6) Bulk Cargo Terminal…………………………………………………………………….55 e.7) Liquid Cargo……………………………………………………………………………..56 e.8) Bršica Terminal …………………………………………………………………………..56 e.9) Škrljevo Terminal…………………………………………………………………………57 f) Statistics of Rijeka Port ………………………………………………………………57 g) Related Links………………………………………………………………………….58 9.1.2 Ploče……………………………………………………………………….59 a) Services (Ploče Port and Metkovic Port)………………………………………...59 b) Ownership Structure ………………………………………………………………...60 c) Internal Organization of the Port …………………………………………………60 d) Company Organization…………………………………………………………….60 C R O A T I A 4 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 e) Terminals ………………………………………………………………………………61 e.1) General Cargo Terminal……………………………………………………………….61 e.2) Bulk Cargo Terminal…………………………………………………………………….62 e.3) Terminal for liquid cargo transshipment…………………………………………….63 e.4) Grain cargo terminal…………………………………………………………………...64 e.5) Wood Terminal…………………………………………………………………………..65 e.6) Alumina and Petroleum coke terminal …………………………………………….66 e.7) Container terminal……………………………………………………………………...67 f) General Statistics of Ploče Port……………………………………………………..68 g) Projects at Ploče Port………………………………………………………………..72 g.1) Bulk Cargo at Port of Ploče.…………………………………………………………..72 h) Related Links………………………………………………………………………….75 9.1.3 Zadar ………………………………………………………………………76 9.1.4 Šibenik …………………………………………………………………….77 9.1.5 Split ………………………………………………………………………...77 9.1.6 Dubrovnik ………………………………………………………………...78 a) Projects at Dubrovnik Port …………………………………………………………78 a.1) Reconstruction of port infrastructure, Berth 10-16………………..………………78 a.2) Project of reconstruction of operation shore Batahovina: …………………….78 a.3) Rebuilding plan of Port’s superstructure:…………………………………………..79 9.2 Harbormasters’ Offices……………………………………………………...79 9.3 Port Authorities ……………………………………………………………….79 10. RIVER TRANSPORT …………………………………………………………………....80 11. PIPELINES ………………………………………………………………………………82 12. LOGISTICS REPORT …………………………………………………………………..83 13. ANALYSIS – SUMMARY……………………………………………………………….84 13.1 General Overview …………………………………………………………...84 13.2 Air Transport …………………………………………………………………..84 13.3 Road Transport ……………………………………………………………….85 13.4 Railways………………………………………………………………………...86 13.5 Sea Transport …………………………………………………………………86 13.6 Multimodal (combined transport ………………………………………...87 13.7 Logistics…………………………………………………………………………87 14. CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………87 APPENDIX 1: Summary of Links …………………………………………………………….89 APPENDIX 2: Useful Contacts……………………………………………………………….93 C R O A T I A 5 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 1. CROATIA OVERVIEW Area: 56,542 sq. km (22,830 sq. mi) Population: 4.5m (July 2009 est.) Capital City: Zagreb (population: 800,000) Official Language: Croatian Religion: It is estimated that about 85% of the population is Roman Catholic. Orthodoxes make up around 5% of the population and Muslims a further 1.3 % Currency: Croatian Kuna (HRK) Major Political Parties: Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), Social Democratic Party of Croatia (SDP), Croatian People's Party – Liberal Democrats (HNS), and a Croatian Peasant Party (HSS) - Croatian Liberal Party (HSLS) coalition. Government: Parliamentary Democracy1 President: Social Democrat Ivo Josipović was elected for a five-year term in January 2010. Prime Minister: Mrs Jadranka Kosor Foreign Minister: Mr Gordan Jandroković Membership of International Organizations: United Nations, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Council of Europe, Regional Cooperation Council, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, World Trade Organization, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Partnership for Peace, NATO. 1 http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/europe/croatia/?profile=all C R O A T I A 6 [TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN CROATIA] Zagreb, 2010 2. ECONOMY Basic Economic Facts (Source: Croatian National Bank) GDP: €47.4 billion GDP per head: €10,700 Average Monthly salary (gross): €1044 Average Monthly salary (NET): € 734 Annual Growth: 6% Inflation: 3% Official unemployment: 13.2% (ILO figure 9%) Major Industries: Tourism, shipbuilding,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mediterranean Corridor Work Plan
    Mediterranean Work Plan of the European Coordinator Laurens Jan Brinkhorst Transport MAY 2015 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. 1. Towards the Mediterranean Corridor work plan On 1 January 2014 a new era has begun in European infrastructure policy with the setting up of nine core network corridors led by a European coordinator and the creation of the Connecting Europe Facility as financing instrument. This new framework includes not only the Member States but also all other stakeholders of the Corridor: infrastructure managers (for road, rail, ports, inland waterways, airports and multi-modal terminals), regions and representatives of the transport industry as users of the infrastructure. All these stakeholders come together in the Corridor Forum: four meetings of the Corridor Forum have been held in 2014 and have functioned as unique platform allowing a transparent and constantly deepening dialogue. Furthermore, the Corridor Forum served as the “testing ground” of many of the findings and recommendations presented in this document. This work plan is largely based on the study of the Mediterranean corridor (the Corridor Study) carried out in 2014. It is presented as the result of the collaborative efforts of the Member States, the European Commission, external consultants and chaired by the European Coordinator. The work plan has been elaborated in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 which establishes Union guidelines for the development of the trans- European transport network (the Regulation)1. The concept of core network corridors rests on three pillars: modal integration, interoperability and the coordinated development of its infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brochure Visit Adriatic Museums: from Italy to the Balkans
    Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans Visit Adriatic Museums from Italy to the Balkans This document has been produced with the financial assistance the museumcultour project 04 of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border Cooperation Programme. The project partners 05 contents of this document are the sole responsibility of DELTA the adriatic photo exhibition 08 2000 soc. Cons a .rl. under no circumstances be regarded museums’ network 11 as reflecting the position of the IPA Adriatic Cross-Border italy Cooperation Programme Authorities. museo del mare di san benedetto del tronto 13 Pubblication realized by DELTA 2000, Consortium Company with limited liability, musei della cartiera papale di ascoli piceno 18 Ostellato (ITALY) www.deltaduemila.net museo natura di sant’alberto 25 In cooperation with: ecomuseo di argenta 30 Ecomuseo di Argenta (FE - ITALY) www.vallidiargenta.org manifattura dei marinati comacchio 35 Manifattura dei Marinati, Comacchio (FE - ITALY) www.aqua-deltadelpo.com museo del territorio di ostellato 40 Musei della Cartiera Papale di Ascoli Piceno (AP - ITALY) www.museicartierapapale.it Museo del Cervo e del Bosco della Mesola, Mesola (FE - ITALY) www.prolocomesola.it museo del cervo e del bosco della mesola 45 Museo del Mare di San Benedetto del Tronto (AP - ITALY) www.museodelmaresbt.it slovenia Museo del Territorio di Ostellato (FE - ITALY) www.atlantide.net Museo NatuRa, Sant’Alberto (RA - ITALY) www.atlantide.net notranjski muzej postojna 51 Muzeumet Berat (ALBANIA) www.muzeumet-berat.al postojnska jama cave-grotte-höhle
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 24.04.2020
    DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. Reporting time: 13.30 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 1-2 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia:.no delays. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 1-2 km long waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 2-3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 10 minutes (1 truck). As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap. The trucks from Serbia that are transiting through Romania can use Vatin border crossing. DAILY REPORT 24.04.2020. B OSN I A AND HERZEGO VINA Gradiška: • 30 trucks waiting on BiH exit. • There is a waiting line at the Croatian checkpoint on BiH entry, waiting time 5 hours. • There are a lot of vehicles at the customs terminal Gardiška.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Insurance Zagreb
    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Requirements
    Nomination Requirements For the Michigan Blue Ribbon Exemplary Schools Program Prepared by: Grissom Middle School 35701 Ryan Road Sterling Heights, MI 48310 586-825-2560 Mrs. Suzanne Nye, Principal Warren Consolidated Schools Dr. James Clor, Superintendent PREPARATION OF SCHOOL SELF-ASSESSMENT STAKEHOLDERS POSITION Sue Fragnoli Co-Chair/Counselor Danielle McLean Co-Chair/Teacher Carol Klaiman Teacher/Editor/Section G Leader Sharon Fitzhenry Teacher/Editor Barbara Sikora Teacher Michelle Partridge Teacher Sandy Hawrys Secretary Karen Blaske Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Nancy Campbell Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Barbara Jones Teacher/Section H Leader Irina Hirchberger Teacher/Section C Leader Victor Kolpak Teacher/Section F Co-Leader Bob Maus Teacher/Section E Co-Leader Jennifer Pisha Teacher/Section A Leader Jacquelyn Walters Teacher/Section B Leader Heather Wasmuth Teacher/Section D Leader Dena Berke Teacher Sylvia Buck Teacher Eileen Byrnes Teacher Marge Czarnik Teacher Patrick Dailey Teacher Dave Elliott Teacher Sally Erdelean Teacher Ronna Fisher Counselor Christine Gluszewski Teacher Jeff Gray Teacher Judy Gregory Teacher Christine Guerreso Teacher Michael Gurney Teacher Heidi Kuhn Teacher Sue MacQuarrie Teacher Samar Mansour Teacher Tari Michaelson Teacher Patricia Mulholland Teacher Elizabeth Rinehart Teacher David Rodriquez Teacher Yvette Searle Teacher Jeff Skwier Teacher Debbie Tesch Teacher Justin Watson Teacher Marsha White Teacher Jeanne Yasso Teacher Elizabeth Zachary Teacher 2 PART I: ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION The signatures on the first page of this nomination package certify that each of the statements below concerning the school’s eligibility, previous recognition in the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, and compliance with U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights (OCR) requirements is true and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 the APPEALS CHAMBER Before
    ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 1/137 NM A7 A8 Statute Original: English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Piotr Hofmański, Presiding Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji Judge Howard Morrison Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO Public redacted Judgment on the appeals against Trial Chamber II’s ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 1/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 2/137 NM A7 A8 Judgment to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: Legal Representatives of V01 Victims Counsel for the Defence Mr Luc Walleyn Ms Catherine Mabille Mr Franck Mulenda Mr Jean-Marie Biju-Duval Legal Representatives of V02 Victims Trust Fund for Victims Ms Carine Bapita Buyangandu Mr Pieter de Baan Mr Joseph Keta Orwinyo Office of Public Counsel for Victims Ms Paolina Massidda REGISTRY Registrar Mr Peter Lewis No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 2/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 3/137 NM A7 A8 J u d g m e n t ................................................................................................................... 4 I. Key findings ........................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction to the appeals ..................................................................................... 6 III. Preliminary issues ............................................................................................... 8 A. OPCV’s standing to participate in these appeals ............................................ 8 B. Admissibility of the OPCV’s Consolidated Response to the Appeal Briefs in respect of Mr Lubanga’s Appeal Brief ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA
    A5 BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. u planu ostale autoceste MOST DRAVA ODMOR. STROSSMAYEROVAC MOST HRASTINKA MOST SAVA LINIJSKI PRIKAZ AUTOCESTE A5 BUDAPEST LEGENDA R. HRVATSKA Beli Manastir PUO Baranja Most Most Drava, L = 2485 m PUO Mursa Osijek PUO Beketinci u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. A5 PUO Strossmayerovac u planu Most Topolina, L = 131 m ostale autoceste Most Hrastinka, L = 176 m PUO Ivandvor Most preko zapadnog lateralnog kanala, L = 133 m PUO Andrijevci Sredanci ZAGREB LIPOVAC A3 A3 Svilaj R. HRVATSKA BiH Most Sava, L = 756 m SARAJEVO AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj, dio je međunarodnog Paneuropskog cestovnog koridora Vc i jedan od najvažnijih ogranaka TEM/TER Projekta. Predmetna autocesta je dio europske mreže prome- tnica s oznakom E73, koja sjever Europe povezuje s Jadranom. Prometni koridor Vc, koji se pruža od Budimpešte preko Sarajeva do Ploča složena je poveznica sjeverne – srednje i južne Europe te predstavlja izuzetnu vri- jednost za privrednu i prometnu integraciju srednjo- europskog prostora. Izgradnjom prometnog koridora Vc povezanost i transparentnost prometnih pravaca cestovnog, željezničkog, riječnog i zračnog prometa direktno će utjecati na razvoj šireg i snažnijeg prome- tnog povezivanja Europe i Azije. 3 AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Na dijelu Vc koridora, koji prolazi kroz teritorij Repu- Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir Osijek – Svilaj, dužine 88,6 blike Hrvatske, nalazi se autocesta A5 Beli Manastir km, podijeljena je na sljedeće dionice: – Osijek – Svilaj, koja se proteže od granice s Repu- blikom Mađarskom do granice s Republikom Bosnom Granica Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas
    The World Bank Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 www.erm.com Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world The World Bank /PROFOR Sustainable Financing Review for Croatia Protected Areas October 2009 Prepared by: James Spurgeon (ERM Ltd), Nick Marchesi (Pescares), Zrinca Mesic (Oikon) and Lee Thomas (Independent). For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Eamonn Barrett Signed: Position: Partner Date: 27 October 2009 This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Environmental Resources Management Limited Incorporated in the United Kingdom with registration number 1014622 Registered Office: 8 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0ER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 AIMS 2 1.3 APPROACH 2 1.4 STRUCTURE OF REPORT 3 1.5 WHAT DO WE MEAN BY SUSTAINABLE FINANCE 3 2 PA FINANCING IN CROATIA 5 2.1 CATEGORIES OF PROTECTED
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Autocesta Zagreb – Sisak
    A 11 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB – SISAK Zagreb, ožujak 2006. SEKTOR ZA GRAĐENJE ODJEL ZA PROJEKTIRANJE A 11 AUTOCESTA ZAGREB - SISAK OPĆENITO Programom prostornog uređenja Republike Hrvatske iz 1999. godine autocesta Zagreb - Sisak pripada prvoj skupini prioriteta koji su od važnosti za državu. Trasa počinje na obilaznici Zagreba kod mjesta Jakuševec u čvorištu Jakuševec te završava spojem na postojeću državnu cestu D37 Sisak - Petrinja. Autocesta je duljine ~ 47,5 km uključivo i odvojak za privremeni spoj na D37 duljine ~1,2 km. Grad Sisak će se preko čvora Sisak spojiti na autocestu te je predviđena spojna cesta za Sisak duljine ~ 3 km koja se spaja na glavnu os autoceste. Južni ulaz u grad Zagreb u dužini od cca 1.3 km predviđen je nadvožnjakom iznad ranžirnog kolodvora i spojem na produženu Sarajevsku ulicu. Postojeća prometna infrastruktura (državna cesta D30 i D36) koja spaja Zagreb i Sisak ne zadovoljava potrebe suvremenog prometa, te će se planiranom autocestom povezati najznačajnija gospodarska žarišta u Hrvatskoj koristeći najpovoljnije prirodne mogućnosti za vođenje prometnice. TRASA Trasa je “postavljena” na osnovu dosadašnjih istraživanja koridora Zagreb – Sisak i nalazi se unutar koridora predviđenog za tu autocestu iz prostornih planova Zagrebačke i Sisačko-moslavačke županije. Autocesta ima glavne spojeve na postojeću mrežu u području Zagreb – Velika Gorica (A 3: Bregana – Zagreb – Lipovac, te D 30: Velika Gorica – Petrinja – H. Kostajnica i D 31: Velika Gorica – Pokupsko) i u području Sisak – Petrinja (D 36 Pokupsko – Sisak i D 37: Sisak – Petrinja – Glina). Spomenuti spojevi su čvorišta “Jakuševec” i “Velika Gorica – jug” te priključci Veliko Polje i Velika Gorica u području Zagreb – Velika Gorica, dok su u području Sisak – Petrinja to čvorišta “Sisak” i “Mošćenica”, te čvorišta “Lekenik” kao spoj na D 30 preko Ž 3230 i “Buševec” kao spoj na Ž 3116.
    [Show full text]