DOCSLIB.ORG

English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 the APPEALS CHAMBER Before

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 the APPEALS CHAMBER Before ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 1/137 NM A7 A8 Statute Original: English No. ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 Date: 18 July 2019 THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Piotr Hofmański, Presiding Judge Chile Eboe-Osuji Judge Howard Morrison Judge Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO Public redacted Judgment on the appeals against Trial Chamber II’s ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 1/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 2/137 NM A7 A8 Judgment to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: Legal Representatives of V01 Victims Counsel for the Defence Mr Luc Walleyn Ms Catherine Mabille Mr Franck Mulenda Mr Jean-Marie Biju-Duval Legal Representatives of V02 Victims Trust Fund for Victims Ms Carine Bapita Buyangandu Mr Pieter de Baan Mr Joseph Keta Orwinyo Office of Public Counsel for Victims Ms Paolina Massidda REGISTRY Registrar Mr Peter Lewis No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 2/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 3/137 NM A7 A8 J u d g m e n t ................................................................................................................... 4 I. Key findings ........................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction to the appeals ..................................................................................... 6 III. Preliminary issues ............................................................................................... 8 A. OPCV’s standing to participate in these appeals ............................................ 8 B. Admissibility of the OPCV’s Consolidated Response to the Appeal Briefs in respect of Mr Lubanga’s Appeal Brief .................................................................... 11 C. OPCV’s request for rejection of the appeals ‘outright’................................. 12 D. Mr Lubanga’s request for suspension of the Decision of 7 February 2019 .. 13 IV. Standard of review ............................................................................................ 15 V. Merits ................................................................................................................... 17 A. System for the award of reparations .............................................................. 20 1. Procedural background and relevant parts of the Impugned Decision ...... 20 2. Mr Lubanga’s first ground of appeal ......................................................... 27 3. Mr Lubanga’s fourth ground of appeal ...................................................... 39 4. Victims V01’s first ground of appeal ........................................................ 48 5. Victims V01’s second ground of appeal .................................................... 57 B. Assessment of the individual applications .................................................... 68 1. Mr Lubanga’s second ground of appeal .................................................... 68 2. Mr Lubanga’s third ground of appeal ........................................................ 94 3. Victims V01’s third ground of appeal ..................................................... 115 C. Other grounds of appeal .............................................................................. 117 1. Mr Lubanga’s fifth ground of appeal ...................................................... 117 2. Mr Lubanga’s sixth ground of appeal ...................................................... 130 VI. Appropriate relief ............................................................................................ 136 No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 3/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 4/137 NM A7 A8 The Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court, In the appeals of the legal representatives of the V01 group of victims and of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the decision of Trial Chamber II entitled ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ of 15 December 2017, to which a corrigendum was issued on 21 December 2017 (ICC-01/04-01/06-3379-Red-Corr-tENG), After deliberation, Unanimously, Delivers the following JUDGMENT 1) The ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ of 15 December 2017 (ICC-01/04- 01/06-3379-Red-Corr-tENG) is confirmed, subject to sub-paragraph 2) to follow. 2) The ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’ of 15 December 2017 (ICC-01/04- 01/06-3379-Red-Corr-tENG) is amended such that the victims whom Trial Chamber II found ineligible to receive reparations, and who consider that their failure to sufficiently substantiate their allegations, including by supporting documentation, resulted from insufficient notice of the requirements for eligibility, may seek a new assessment of their eligibility by the Trust Fund for Victims, together with other victims who may come forward in the course of the implementation stage and as envisaged by Trial Chamber II in paragraphs 292 – 297 and the disposition of the aforementioned decision; any recommendations as to eligibility made by the Trust Fund for Victims shall be subject to the approval of Trial Chamber II. 3) The ‘Defence Application for Suspension of the “Décision approuvant les propositions du Fonds au profit des victimes portant sur la procédure No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 4/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 5/137 NM A7 A8 visant à localiser et décider de l’admissibilité aux réparations des nouveaux demandeurs” Issued on 7 February 2019 by Trial Chamber II’ (ICC-01/04-01/06-3447-Red-tENG) is dismissed in limine. REASONS I. KEY FINDINGS 1. The second sentence of article 75(1) of the Statute concerns, inter alia, the trigger for reparations proceedings: upon conviction of a person by the Court, the trial chamber will enter into the reparations phase of proceedings (i) if it has received requests for reparations by individuals identifying themselves as victims, or (ii) on its own motion, if exceptional circumstances exist. 2. It would be incorrect to assume that the number of victims may only be established based on individual requests for reparations received by the Court. It would be undesirable for the trial chamber to be restrained in that determination simply because not all victims had presented themselves to the Court by making a request under rule 94 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. In making that determination, the trial chamber should consider the scope of damage as it is in the current reality, based on the crimes for which the convicted person was found culpable. 3. In deciding what reparations are ‘appropriate’, a trial chamber must take into account the rights of the convicted person. The reparations order must not go beyond the crimes for which he or she was convicted. The convicted person must be given a sufficient opportunity to make submissions on the scope of reparations, the scope of victimhood to be repaired, the type of reparations, etc., so as to comply with the requirements of fairness. To that end, the trial chamber must give notice to the parties of the manner in which it intends to conduct the reparations proceedings before it, especially where it does not intend to make individual determinations with respect to each victim who has filed a request. In this regard, it must ensure that the convicted person is adequately on notice as to the information on which it will rely in making its order, so that he or she has a meaningful opportunity to make representations thereon, and it must give notice as to the manner in which it intends to assess that information No: ICC-01/04-01/06 A7 A8 5/137 ICC-01/04-01/06-3466-Red 18-07-2019 6/137 NM A7 A8 – e.g. does it intend to assess each request individually? The Trial Chamber must also ensure that the parties are on notice as to the standard of proof that will be applied in the proceedings so that they are aware of the manner in which the information will be assessed. [...] If the trial chamber resorts to estimates as to the number of victims, such estimates must be based on a sufficiently strong evidential basis; any uncertainties must be resolved in favour of the convicted person (for instance, by assuming a lower number of victims, or by discounting the amount of liability). 4. The amount of the convicted person’s liability should be fixed taking into account the cost of reparations considered to be appropriate and that are intended to be put in place (which can include reparations programmes) and the different harms suffered by the different victims, both individual victims (direct and indirect) in addition to, in particular circumstances, the collective of victims. In setting the amount, the trial chamber must also ensure that it takes into account the convicted person’s rights and interests. 5. It is important for trial chambers to provide a clear indication to victims who have already been authorised to participate in proceedings, and to other victims seeking reparations, as to the standard of proof that will apply to the assessment of their eligibility for reparations. II. INTRODUCTION TO THE APPEALS 6. Mr Lubanga was convicted, on 14 March 2012, of the crimes of conscripting and enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the FPLC1 and using them to participate actively in hostilities. On 7 August 2012, Trial Chamber
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Center Rojc, Pula, Croatia
    SOLIDARITY MOVERS OF ROJC Community center Rojc, Pula, Croatia CONTENT Community center Rojc Rojc Alliance About the project Activities About Pula Currency How to get to Pula Meet the team Contact Follow us Community center Rojc is a unique space Community for culture and civil society. Situated in a repurposed building that forms part of the cultural heritage of Pula, the center gathers center Rojc over a hundred organisations under one roof while also hosting numerous cultural and social events. The center is polivalent space with wide spectrum of activities: culture, sports, psychosocial care and health services, activities for children and youth, care for the disabled, environmental protection, technical culture, ethnic minorities, etc. Community center Rojc is a member of Trans Europe Halles. Rojc Alliance The Rojc Alliance is a network of Rojc organizations that presents and represents common interests, promotes mutual cooperation and carries out community actions and events. Main activities of Rojc Alliance are: management and events in Rojc public spaces - the Living room and inner courtyard; community radio Radio Rojc; community development programs; participatory governance; networking and fostering development of cultural and community centers; European Solidarity Corps volunteering progams. The Rojc Alliance has formed a kind of civic-public partnership with the City of Pula, which co- governs the center and encourages its development. WHAT WE DO The center is a host to 110 associations from various fields. Thousands of Rojc inhabitants and their visitors pass through its painted hallways each week – bringing vivid influence to the community life. PROJECT NAME Solidarity movers of Rojc PROJECT DURATION 1.8.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Insurance Zagreb
    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) 2nd Draft April 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia National Report 2007
    CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT 2007 I Network The total length of motorway network, as completed by the end of 2007 in Croatia, amounts to 1163.5 km. In 2007, 75,9 km of new motorways and 3,8 km of semi motorways were built (as compared to 43 km that were built in 2006), and 15,7 km of existing roads were upgraded to the full motorway profile: On the Motorway A1: Zagreb - Split - Ploče; Dugopolje-Bisko-Šestanovac Sections (37 km) - opened to traffic in full profile in 06/2007 On the Motorway A2: Zagreb - Macelj Krapina-Macelj Section (17.2 km) –13,4 km was completed as full motorway and 3,8 km as semi motorway On the Motorway A5: Beli Manastir-Osijek-border with Bosnia and Herzegovina Sredanci-Đakovo Section (23 km) – opened to traffic as full motorway in 11/2007 On the Motorway A6: Zagreb - Rijeka - on the Vrbovsko-Bosiljevo Section (8,44 km) – upgrade to the full motorway profile of the viaduct Zeceve Drage, tunnel Veliki Gložac, viaduct Osojnik and viaduct Severinske Drage together with corresponding motorway segments in 06/2007 - on the Oštrovica-Kikovica Section (7,25 km) - upgrade to the full motorway profile in 11/2007 On the Motorway A11: Zagreb – Sisak On the Jakuševec-Velika Gorica South Section – completion of the interchange Velika Gorica South and 2,5 km of a motorway segment in 5/2007 and in 09/2007 In Croatia, motorways are operated by 4 companies, i.e. by Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. (operates all toll motorways except for those in concession) and by three concession companies BINA-ISTRA d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Regulations
    SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS INTERNATIONAL RALLY FIA CENTRAL EUROPEAN ZONE RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP INTERNATIONAL ZONE CROATIAN CHAMPIONSHIP CROATIAN NATIONAL RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP MITROPA RALLY CUP BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA NATIONAL RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA RALLY CUP Organizer: Automobile club “Opatija” Co-organizers: 28. R A L L Y OPATIJA 2019 - SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. PROGRAMME ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 4. ENTRIES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. INSURENCE ................................................................................................................................................................... 7 6. ADVERTISING AND IDENTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................... 7 7. TRYES ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX A8 How Much Effort Did Students Invest in the PISA Test?
    ANNEX A8 How much effort did students invest in the PISA test? Performance on school tests is the result of the interplay amongst what students know and can do, how quickly they process information, and how motivated they are for the test. To ensure that students who sit the PISA test engage with the assessment conscientiously and sustain their efforts throughout the test, schools and students that are selected to participate in PISA are often reminded of the importance of the study for their country. For example, at the beginning of the test session, the test administrator reads a script that includes the following sentence: “This is an important study because it will tell us about what you have been learning and what school is like for you. Because your answers will help influence future educational policies in <country and/or education system>, we ask you to do the very best you can.” However, viewed in terms of the individual student who takes the test, PISA can be described as a low-stakes assessment: students can refuse to participate in the test without suffering negative consequences, and do not receive any feedback on their individual performance. If students perceive an absence of personal consequences associated with test performance, there is a risk that they might not invest adequate effort (Wise and DeMars, 2010[1]). Several studies in the United States have found that student performance on assessments, such as the United States national assessment of educational progress (NAEP), depends on the conditions of administration. In particular, students performed less well in regular low-stakes conditions compared to experimental conditions in which students received financial rewards tied to their performance or were told that their results would count towards their grades (Wise and DeMars, 2005[2]).
    [Show full text]
  • Table A8 MOBILE PHONE LAWS by COUNTRY/AREA
    TABLE A8 MOBILE PHONE LAWS BY COUNTRY/AREA Law applies to Data on the use of Legislation on mobile Hand-held and mobile phones while Country/area phone use while driving Hand-held phones hands-free phones driving available Afghanistan No — — No Albania Yes Yes No No Andorra Yes Yes No No Angola Yes Yes No Yes Argentina Yes Yes Yes Yes Armenia Yes Yes No Yes Australia Subnational Yes No Yes Austria Yes Yes No Yes Azerbaijan Yes Yes No No Bahamas No — — No Bahrain Yes Yes No Yes Bangladesh Yes Yes Yes No Barbados No — — No Belarus Yes Yes No No Belgium Yes Yes No No Belize No — — No Benin Yes Yes Yes No Bhutan Yes Yes Yes No Bolivia (Plurinational State of) No — — No Bosnia and Herzegovina Yes Yes No Yes Botswana Yes Yes No Yes Brazil Yes Yes No No Brunei Darussalam Yes Yes No Yes Bulgaria Yes Yes No No Burkina Faso Yes Yes No No Burundi No — — No Cambodia Yes Yes No Yes Cameroon Yes Yes Yes No Canada Subnational Yes No Yes Cape Verde Yes Yes No Yes Central African Republic No — — No Chad No — — No Chile Yes Yes No Yes China Yes Yes No — Colombia Yes Yes No No Comoros No — — No Congo Yes — — No Cook Islands No — — No Costa Rica Yes Yes No Yes Côte d'Ivoire No — — No Croatia Yes Yes No Yes Cuba Yes Yes No — Cyprus Yes Yes No No Czech Republic Yes Yes No Yes Democratic People's Yes Yes Yes No Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the No — — Yes Congo Denmark Yes Yes No No Dominica No — — No Dominican Republic Yes Yes No No Ecuador Yes Yes No No 284 Law applies to Data on the use of Legislation on mobile Hand-held and mobile phones while
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya 1St Mover PPP Road Projects
    MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, INFRASTRUCTURE, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STATE DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE Kenya 1st Mover PPP Road Projects 14TH March, 2017 Eng. Peter M. Mundinia Director General, Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) 1 CONTENTS . Nairobi Southern Bypass . Mombasa – Nairobi . Nairobi – Thika Highway . Rironi – Naivasha – Nakuru . Nyali Bridge 2 Nairobi Southern O&M PPP Project • Construction commenced early 2012 and is expected to be completed by May 2016. • 28.6km of dual carriageway with 12 km of slip roads and 8.5 km Service Roads • Design speed of 100 km/hr. • Pavement Design: loading of 40 M CESA 3 Toll Plaza Location Toll Plaza Location Just to the West of Ngong Road Intersection Proposed: Toll Plaza Location South of Langata Road I/C 4 Toll Plaza Layout 5 Nairobi Southern Bypass Investments include: Toll plaza to the west of Ngong Road; Provision of containment barriers on both sides of the central reserve; Local improvements to the interchange slip roads; Improvements to the Nairobi National Park and Ngong Forest perimeter fencing; Weighbridges CAPEX - 4 WIMs 6 Widening of Ngong Road • Full on-line dualling of Ngong Road from the Dagoretti Corner (Junction Mall) to the Ngong Road Interchange over a total distance of 3.28km with service roads on both sides. • Upgrading of the Dagoretti Corner junction by provision of a viaduct for through traffic city bound on Ngong Road 7 Possible Additional CAPEX ADDITIONAL CAPEX (M KSH) Widening of Ngong Road 3,595.0 Interchange at Gitaru/A8 upgrade works - local Improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis Report in Rijeka University of Rijeka-Faculty of Medicine -Teaching Institute of Public Health
    ECOlogical supporting for traffic Management in cOastal areas By using an InteLlIgenT sYstem 01/01/2018 - 30/09/2019 Analysis report in Rijeka University of Rijeka-Faculty of Medicine -Teaching Institute of Public Health Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) Version: Final Distribution: public Date: September 30th 2019 WP3: Assessment of the effect of ship traffic to particulate matter ACT 3.2: Experimental activities in Rijeka European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/acronym http://www.italy-croatia.eu/ Analysis report in Rijeka/ final CONTRIBUTED TO THIS WORK Ana Alebić-Juretić, University of Rijeka- Faculty of Medicine, Environmental Health Department Boris Mifka, Departmant of Physics, University of Rijeka Velimir Zubak, Environmental Health Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health Dario Kontošić, Environmental Health Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health Paula Žurga, Environmental Health Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health Marjana Mezlar, Environmental Health Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health Dajana Odorčić, Environmental Health Department, Teaching Institute of Public Health Eva Merico, Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) Fabio M. Grasso, Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) Daniela Cesari, Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) Marianna Conte, Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) Daniele Contini, Institute for Atmospheric Science and Climate of the National Research Council (ISAC-CNR) 1 Analysis report in Rijeka/ final INTRODUCTION This report deals with experimental activities carried out in Rijeka within activity 3.2 of the ECOMOBILITY project.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia National Report 2008
    CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT 2008 I Current state of the network At the start of 2009, the total length of the motorway network in Croatia amounted to 1.198,7 km. The following new roadways were opened to traffic in 2008: - 41.5 km of new motorways - 36.9 km of widening of existing road sections to the full motorway profile At the motorway A1: Zagreb-Split - Ploče the Šestanovac – Zagvozd - Ravča sections (40 km) - were opened to traffic in full profile in 12/2008. At the motorway A4: Zagreb - Goričan the section from Goričan to Hungarian border (1,5 km) with the bridge over the Mura River was opened to traffic in 10/2008. At the motorway A6: Zagreb-Rijeka the total of 36,9 km were widened to the full motorway profile (Phase II B) A part of the Oštrovica - Vrata section (12,44 km) – in 09/2008 Vrata - Delnice section (8,93 km) – in 06/2008 Delnice - Kupjak section (7,92 km) – in 06/2008 a part of the Kupjak - Vrbovsko section (7,59 km) – in 06/2008 In Croatia, motorways are operated by 4 companies, i.e. by Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. (operates all toll motorways except for those in concession) and by three concession companies BINA-ISTRA d.d. Pula (operates the so called Istrian Upsilon - A8 and A9), Autocesta Rijeka-Zagreb d.d. (A6 and A7) and Autocesta Zagreb-Macelj d.o.o. (A2). Number of motorway kilometres - Company 2007. 2008. Tolled facilities total Tolled facilities total 1. HAC d.o.o. 780,0 816,0 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) Highway (Ppp) Project
    PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE NAIROBI - NAKURU – MAU SUMMIT (A8) HIGHWAY (PPP) PROJECT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN LEAD EXPERT ADDRESS PROPONENT ADDRESS Charles and Barker Limited Kenya National Highways Authority Upper Hill Devan Plaza, 4th Floor, Suite 4 P. O. BOX 49712 – 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Crossway Road, off Chiromo Road, Westlands, TEL: +254 2989000, +254 20 8013842, +254 20 P.O. Box 1784-00606 495400, +254 20 2889000 Tel +254-020-8008640 CELL: +254 731 330336; +254 700 423606 Nairobi, Kenya EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.kenha.co.ke Blue Shield Towers, Upper Hill, Nairobi JULY 2018 Proposed Development, Operations and Maintenance of the Nairobi - Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) Highway (PPP) Project - Resettlement Action Plan CITATION This report should be cited as: KeNHA(2018). RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN for the Proposed Development, Operations and Maintenance of the Nairobi - Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) highway (PPP) Project between (x) 236820.65, (y) 9874606.05 (Arc- 1960-UTM-Zone-37S) and (x) 799767.25 (y) 9982461.45 (Arc-1960-UTM-Zone-36S) - Charles and Barker Limited, Nairobi, Kenya. Charles & Barker Ltd is a consultancy firm established in Kenya to provide services in environmental and natural resources that meets local and international best practices. Their objective is to remain at the forefront of technology by liaising with reputable individuals and organisations to deliver consultancy services. The services offered by the firm include but are not limited to: Environmental due diligence, environmental impact assessment, environmental auditing, monitoring for environmental aspects, remediation studies, environmental and social baseline studies and natural resource and earth science studies.
    [Show full text]