DOCSLIB.ORG

Plutonium a Wartime Nightmare but a Metallurgist’S Dream

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plutonium a Wartime Nightmare but a Metallurgist’S Dream Plutonium A Wartime Nightmare but a Metallurgist’s Dream by Richard D. Baker, Siegfried S. Hecker, and Delbert R. Harbur n 1942 the theoretical outline for an Research from 1943 to 1946 electron-volt deuterons in the cyclotron at atomic bomb was clear: compress Berkeley. Within about a month it was enough fissionable material long The Los Alamos work on plutonium and shown that plutonium-239 fissioned when I enough to properly ignite a chain enriched uranium, the so-called special nu- bombarded with slow neutrons, and a de- reaction. Construction of an actual weapon, clear materials, was extensive, covering a cision was made to build large reactors at however, required translation of “fissionable variety of research problems ranging from Hanford for the production of pluto- material” into real pieces of plutonium or purification of material received from reac- nium—this before the uranium-graphite pile uranium metal. These metals had to be free tors to the prevention of oxidation of the at Chicago had demonstrated that a sus- of impurities that would adversely affect the final product. Further, because many chemi- tained and controlled chain reaction was neutron flux during the chain reaction and cal processes and physics experiments re- even possible! That demonstration soon fol- yet be fabricable enough that precise shapes quired very pure materials, such as gold, lowed, proving that large quantities of pluto- could be formed. Whether this would even be beryllium oxide, graphite, and many plastics, nium could be produced, although no pluto- possible with plutonium was not then known, considerable general materials research was nium was extracted from the Chicago reac- however, because plutonium was a new, also carried out. tor. manmade element and the metal had not Much of the chemistry and metallurgy of At this point only microgram amounts of been produced. uranium was already known from the pro- plutonium had been separated from the Accounts of the Manhattan Project have duction of uranium metal for the uranium- targets used in the cyclotrons. Remarkably, neglected (for security reasons, initially) the graphite reactor pile at Chicago in 1942. The the basic chemistry of plutonium was important metallurgical work that preceded work remaining on enriched uranium in- worked out at Berkeley and Chicago on this fabrication of these materials into integral cluded preparation of high-purity metal, fab- microgram scale, and it formed the basis for parts of real weapons. For example, the rication of components, and recycling of the scale-up—by a factor of a billion— Smyth Report* devotes one short paragraph residues. However, the most challenging re- needed for plants that would eventually to the wartime work of the entire Chemistry search and development was carried out on separate plutonium from spent reactor fuel. and Metallurgy Division at Los Alamos—a the new element plutonium. At the same time the first micrograms of the division that in 1945 numbered 400 scientists Table I gives the important dates in the metal were produced at Chicago by the and technicians. Our article will attempt to early history of plutonium and shows the fill part of this gap for plutonium by high- short time—four years—that elapsed be- *Henry DeWolf Smyth, Atomic Energy for Mili- lighting key developments of the wartime tween its discovery and its use in the first tary Purposes: The Official Report on the Devel- research and will continue with some of the atomic device at Trinity. The discovery oc- opment of the Atomic Bomb under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940-1945 exciting research that has occurred since the curred, as predicted by nuclear theory, when (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1945), war. uranium was bombarded with 16-million- pp. 221-222. 142 Winter/Spring 1983 LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE TABLE I EARLY HISTORY OF PLUTONIUM reduction of fluorides, and preliminary Plutonium discovered February 23,1941 metallurgical properties were determined. Neutron-induced fission of plutonium-239, proved March 25, 1941 However, the influence of impurities on such Decision reached for large, full-scale plutonium production December 6, 1941 First controlled fission chain reaction achieved, December 2, 1942 tiny samples distorted many of the results; proving method for full-scale production of plutonium for example, the melting point of plutonium Preparation of plutonium metal from microgram November, 1943 was first thought to be about 1800 degrees quantities produced with cyclotron Gram quantities of plutonium nitrate from March, 1944 Celsius, considerably above the true melting experimental reactor received at Los Alamos point of 641 degrees. Ultimately, the Plutonium nitrate from production reactor received mid 1944 properties of plutonium were found to be at Los Alamos Plutonium weapon demonstrated with Trinity test July 15, 1945 incredibly sensitive to impurities. It had been agreed that Los Alamos would not work on batches of plutonium of less than about 1 gram, and the microgram-scale extensive effort to obtain pure and nonreac- work continued at Chicago. Finally, in early tive refractories to contain molten phuto- 1944 Los Alamos received plutonium nitrate nium. The high purity requirements also samples containing half-gram amounts of the necessitated the development of new meth- element from the “Clinton” reactor and pilot ods for analysis of all materials, including extraction plant at Oak Ridge. Later, larger plutonium. amounts were received from the production The potential health problem associated facility at Hanford. with the handling of plutonium had been The plutonium nitrate arrived in relatively recognized at Chicago, and work on the impure form, and techniques and equipment subject began with receipt of the first small had to be developed for a number of amounts of plutonium. A Health Group was processes, including purification, preparation formed to monitor plutonium work areas, of plutonium tetrafluoride and other com- and, within the Chemistry and Metallurgy pounds, reduction to metal, and metal fabri- Division itself, committees were established cation. Also, because plutonium was in very to design suitable radiation detectors and short supply, it was imperative to develop apparatus for handling plutonium and to processes to recycle all residues. formulate safe handling procedures. Because Initially, the purity requirements for the alpha counters then lacked either sensitivity metal were very stringent because some or portability and were in short supply, oiled elements, if present, would emit neutrons filter paper was swiped over surfaces to pick upon absorbing alpha particles from the up possible stray bits of plutonium and then radioactive plutonium, These extra neutrons measured at stationary counters. Similar were undesirable in the gun-type plutonium procedures were used to detect suspected weapon then envisioned: they would initiate contamination of hands and nostrils. The air- a chain reaction before the material had conditioning system in the plutonium labora- properly assembled into its supercritical con- tory (D Building), which was installed in- figuration, and this “pre-initiation” would itially to help maintain high purity by filter- decrease the explosive force of the weapon. ing out dust, ultimately served the more Two early discs of plutonium metal after The purity requirement for certain elements important function of confining the pluto- reduction from the tetrafluoride. Pluto- was a few parts per million and for some, nium. The building was equipped with hoods nium generally arrived at the Labora- less than one part per million. As a result, all with minimal ventilation and with the fore- tory from the Hanford reactors in the the materials used in the preparation of the runner of the modern glove box—plywood form of a relatively impure nitrate solu- plutonium metal, everything from the proc- “dry boxes.” The successful handling of tion. Techniques were developed at Los ess chemicals to the containers, had to be of large quantities of plutonium without serious Alamos for purification, preparation of very high purity. This necessitated develop- problems was at that time an outstanding various compounds, reduction to the ment work on many materials, including an achievement. metal, and metal fabrication. LOS ALAMOS SCIENCE Winter/Spring 1983 143 At first plutonium metal was prepared at Los Alamos either by lithium reduction of plutonium tetrafluoride in a centrifuge, the metal settling out as the closed reaction vessel rotated, or by the electrolysis of fused salts containing plutonium. Soon, however, calcium reduction of the tetrafluoride was perfected. The vessel used to contain this reaction was called a stationary “bomb” because the reaction was highly exothermic and the metal product settled out in the closed, nonrotating vessel simply by gravity. This technique became the preferred method and was used to prepare plutonium for almost all metallurgical studies and for the nuclear devices. The microgram metallurgy at Chicago had provided values for the density of the metal that clustered about either 16 or 20 grams per cubic centimeter. This bimodal spread, due surely in part to impurities, nevertheless pointed toward interesting metallurgy by hinting that the element had more than one phase. Working with larger amounts, Los Alamos refined these measure- ments and by the middle of 1944 had discovered that plutonium was a nightmare: no less than five allotropic phases existed between room temperature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WINTER 2013 - Volume 60, Number 4 the Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A
    WINTER 2013 - Volume 60, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the US
    Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the U.S.: Reducing the Deadly Risks of Storage front cover WITH SUPPORT FROM: WITH SUPPORT FROM: By Robert Alvarez 1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600, Washington DC 20036 - www.ips-dc.org May 2011 About the Author Robert Alvarez, an Institute for Policy Studies senior scholar, served as a Senior Policy Advisor to the Secre- tary of Energy during the Clinton administration. Institute for Policy Studies (IPS-DC.org) is a community of public scholars and organizers linking peace, justice, and the environment in the U.S. and globally. We work with social movements to promote true democracy and challenge concentrated wealth, corporate influence, and military power. Project On Government Oversight (POGO.org) was founded in 1981 as an independent nonprofit that investigates and exposes corruption and other misconduct in order to achieve a more effective, accountable, open, and ethical federal government. Institute for Policy Studies 1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 http://www.ips-dc.org © 2011 Institute for Policy Studies [email protected] For additional copies of this report, see www.ips-dc.org Table of Contents Summary ...............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................4 Figure 1: Explosion Sequence at Reactor No. 3 ........................................................4 Figure 2: Reactor No. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the 2021 TMS Award Recipients
    FEBRUARY 2021 jom.tms.org JAn officialO publication of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society CELEBRATING EXCELLENCE: Meet the 2021 TMS Award Recipients Empowering Metallurgists, Process Engineers and Researchers Do you rely on handbook data? What if the materials data you need doesn’t exist? With Thermo-Calc you can: Calculate phase-based proper�es as a func�on of Base Decisions on scien�fically supported composi�on, temperature and �me models Fill in data gaps without resor�ng to costly, Accelerate materials development while �me-consuming experiments reducing risk Predict how actual vs nominal chemistries will affect Troubleshoot issues during materials processing property data Over 40 Thermodynamic and Kine�c Databases Choose from an extensive selec�on of thermodynamic and mobility databases in a range of materials, including: Steel and Fe-Alloys Nickel High Entropy Alloys 70 1000 Lath Total # of Alloys - 1032 1500 Plate RMS - 28.3 60 800 Epsilon 1450 Failure 50 1400 600 1350 40 400 1300 Calculated Ms [K]Calculated 30 200 Frequency 1250 20 Celsius Temperature, 1200 0 10 1150 1100 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1240 1245 1250 1255 1260 1265 1270 1275 1280 1285 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Experimental Ms [K] Solidus temperature (°C) Mole Frac�on Al Comparison of calculated and experimental Varia�on in solidus temperature over 1000 Calculated phase diagram along the Ms temperatures for a wide range of steels composi�ons within alloy 718 specifica�on composi�on line of CoCrFeNi-Al Al Alloys Ti and TiAl Alloys Oxides 2.5 SiO2 Ti-6Al-4V [IMI] 1.0 [1961Wil] [1962McG] 0.9 2.0 Two Liq.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull. Hist. Chem. 4
    ll. t. Ch. 4 (8 2 Cpnd", . Krt., 2, 6, 848 (p.42 Grn. S l: K. THE HISTORY OF THE DEXTER AWARD jn, "r f lrt nd Mtl lrztn f In n th Mll f All lrd, SrO, nd O", Strtr nd ndn, rt I: h hrd d 6, , 880. K. r nd . , "ttnl Cntnt nd Eltr Aaron J. Ihde, University of Wisconsin pl Mnt f Sd lrd", Cnd. h., 6,4 (, 4646. h nnr f th rd, Mdt rllO (848, 6. ln, tprttn rnn nt t . E. ln, brn n Spn nd pld n prtnt rl n n Mrh 8. dtn n Spnh nvrt. At th l f th Spnh . K. jn, "frtn f In nd Mll d Upn Cvl Wr, h fld Spn nd trtd n rr n Mx, frttr t", . h, 28, 0, 6 nd . hr h flt br f th tnl lthn Eltrh., 28, 4, 0220. (th n Grn Inttt n Mx Ct. Althh h hd bn ntrtd n 8. A. E. vn Arl nd . d r, Chh ndn l htr f htr hl tll n Spn, tht ntrt flrd Elrrtth Erhnn, rzl, pz, . h txtb n Mx, hr h d xtnv td f th htr f br tn t jn pt n Erpn txt f tht d tllr n Clnl tn Ar. pblhd nr rfrn t h r tnbr th t n thr r. ppr n htr f hrntr nd f tllr nd . K. jn nd W. rnnbr, "Infln f Adrbd In th thr f vrl r n tnArn tllr. n th hthl Sntvn f Slvr rd", .
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Fusion-Driven Transmutation Research in China
    Progress in Fusion-Driven Transmutation Research in China Yican WU Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences P.O. Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui, 230031, China E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +86 551 5591310 1. Introduction Although the recent experiments and associated theoretical studies of fusion energy development have proven the feasibility of fusion power, it's commonly realized that it needs hard work before pure fusion energy could commercially and economically utilized. On the other hand, the fission nuclear industry has been falling on hard times recently since so far there has been no conclusion about how to deal with the long-lived wastes produced from the nuclear spent fuel and about how to solve the shortage of natural uranium ore in addition to nuclear safety and proliferation. It's a natural way to develop fusion-fission hybrid reactors including fuel producing reactors and waste transmuting reactors as an alternate strategy to speed up the time for producing energy since a hybrid reactor as a subcritical system can operate with lower fusion energy gain ratios Q, therefore the design of the fusion core for a hybrid system is easier than for a pure fusion reactor. The fusion-fission hybrid concept dates back to the earliest days of the fusion project when it was recognized that using fusion neutrons to breed nuclear fuel would vastly increase the energy from fusion plant. It appears to receive almost no attention since the mid 80's in the world, except in China who has given very serious consideration and has strong hybrid reactor activities since 1986 in the framework of the National Hi’Tech Program supported by the State Science and Technology Commission (SSTC) of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyone in the World, and in That Sense a Completely Common Problem
    " . .When you come right down to it the reason that we did this job is because it was an organic necessity. If you are a scientist you cannot stop such a thing . You believe that it is good to find out how the world works . [and] to turn over to mankind at large the greatest possible power to control the world and to deal with it according to its lights and its values. " . I think it is true to say that atomic weapons are a peril which affect everyone in the world, and in that sense a completely common problem . I think that in order to handle this common problem there must be a complete sense of community responsibility. " . The one point I want to hammer home is what an enormous change in spirit is involved. There are things which we hold very dear, and I think rightly hold very dear; I would say that the word democracy perhaps stood for some of them as well as any other word. There are many parts of the world in which there is no democracy . And when I speak of a new spirit in international affairs I mean that even to these deepest of things which we cherish, and for which Americans have been willing to die—and certainly most of us would be willing to die—even in these deepest things, we realize that there is something more profound than that; namely the common bond with other men everywhere . .“ J. Robert Oppenheimer speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists Los Alamos November 2, 1945 Excerpts from a speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists in Los Alamos, New Mexico, on November 2, 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Poisoning , Also Called Radiation Sickness Or a Creeping Dose , Is a Form of Damage to Organ Tissue Due to Excessive Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
    Radiation poisoning , also called radiation sickness or a creeping dose , is a form of damage to organ tissue due to excessive exposure to ionizing radiation . The term is generally used to refer to acute problems caused by a large dosage of radiation in a short period, though this also has occurred with long term exposure. The clinical name for radiation sickness is acute radiation syndrome ( ARS ) as described by the CDC .[1][2][3] A chronic radiation syndrome does exist but is very uncommon; this has been observed among workers in early radium source production sites and in the early days of the Soviet nuclear program. A short exposure can result in acute radiation syndrome; chronic radiation syndrome requires a prolonged high level of exposure. Radiation exposure can also increase the probability of contracting some other diseases, mainly cancer , tumours , and genetic damage . These are referred to as the stochastic effects of radiation, and are not included in the term radiation sickness. The use of radionuclides in science and industry is strictly regulated in most countries (in the U.S. by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ). In the event of an accidental or deliberate release of radioactive material, either evacuation or sheltering in place are the recommended measures. Radiation sickness is generally associated with acute (a single large) exposure. [4][5] Nausea and vomiting are usually the main symptoms. [5] The amount of time between exposure to radiation and the onset of the initial symptoms may be an indicator of how much radiation was absorbed. [5] Symptoms appear sooner with higher doses of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEETING Meridel Rubenstein 1995
    THE MEETING Meridel Rubenstein 1995 Palladium prints, steel, single-channel video Video assistance by Steina Video run time 4:00 minutes Tia Collection The Meeting consists of twenty portraits of people from San Ildefonso Pueblo and Manhattan Project physicists—who met at the home of Edith Warner during the making of the first atomic bomb—and twenty photographs of carefully selected objects of significance to each group. In this grouping are people from San Ildefonso Pueblo and the objects they selected from the collections of the Museum of Indian Arts and Culture to represent their culture. 1A ROSE HUGHES 2A TALL-NECKED JAR 3A BLUE CORN 4A SLEIGH BELLS 5A FLORENCE NARANJO Rose Hughes holding a photograph of WITH AVANYU One of the most accomplished and (Museum of Indian Arts and Culture) Married to Louis Naranjo; her father, Tony Peña, who organized (plumed serpent) made by Julian and recognized of the San Ildefonso Sleigh bells are commonly used in granddaughter of Ignacio and Susana the building of Edith Warner’s second Maria Martinez, ca. 1930 (Museum of potters. Like many women from the ceremonial dances to attract rain. Aguilar; daughter of Joe Aguilar, who house. Hughes worked at Edith Indian Arts and Culture) Edith Warner pueblos, she worked as a maid for the Tilano Montoya returned with bells like helped Edith Warner remodel the Warner’s with Florence Naranjo one was shown a pot like this one in 1922 Oppenheimers. these from Europe, where he went on tearoom. Edith called her Florencita. summer. She recalls that Edith once on her first visit to San Ildefonso, in the tour with a group of Pueblo dancers.
    [Show full text]
  • From Atomic Energy for Military Purposes
    Atomic Energy for Military Purposes The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb Under the Auspices of the United States Government (The Smyth Report) By Henry De Wolf Smyth Published 1945 CHAPTER XII: THE WORK ON THE ATOMIC BOMB THE OBJECTIVE 12.1. The entire purpose of the work described in the preceding chapters was to explore the possibility of creating atomic bombs and to produce the concentrated fissionable materials which would be required in such bombs. In the present chapter, the last stage of the work will be described - the development at Los Alamos of the atomic bomb itself. As in other parts of the project, there are two phases to be considered: the organization, and the scientific and technical work itself. The organization will be described briefly; the remainder of the chapter will be devoted to the scientific and technical problems. Security considerations prevent a discussion of many of the most important phases of this work. HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION 12.2. The project reorganization that occurred at the beginning of 1942, and the subsequent gradual transfer of the work from OSRD auspices to the Manhattan District have been described in Chapter V. It will be recalled that the responsibilities of the Metallurgical Laboratory at Chicago originally included a preliminary study of the physics of the atomic bomb. Some such studies were made in 1941; and early in 1942 G. Breit got various laboratories (see Chapter VI, paragraph 6.38) started on the experimental study of problems that had to be solved before progress could be made on bomb design.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]