<<

Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics

Series Editors Neil Ashby William Brantley Michael Fowler Michael Inglis Elena Sassi Helmy S. Sherif Heinz Klose

For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8917 Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (ULNP) publishes authoritative texts covering topics throughout pure and applied physics. Each title in the series is suitable as a basis for undergraduate instruction, typically containing practice problems, worked examples, chapter summaries, and suggestions for further reading.

ULNP titles must provide at least one of the following: • An exceptionally clear and concise treatment of a standard undergraduate subject. • A solid undergraduate-level introduction to a graduate, advanced, or non-stan- dard subject. • A novel perspective or an unusual approach to teaching a subject. ULNP especially encourages new, original, and idiosyncratic approaches to physics teaching at the undergraduate level.

The purpose of ULNP is to provide intriguing, absorbing books that will continue to be the reader’s preferred reference throughout their academic career.

Series Editors

Neil Ashby Professor, Professor Emeritus, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

William Brantley Professor, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA

Michael Fowler Professor, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Michael Inglis Professor, SUNY Suffolk County Community College, Selden, NY, USA

Elena Sassi Professor, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

Helmy Sherif Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Bruce Cameron Reed

The History and Science of the

123 Bruce Cameron Reed Department of Physics Alma College Alma, MI USA

ISSN 2192-4791 ISSN 2192-4805 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-642-40296-8 ISBN 978-3-642-40297-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40297-5 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London

Library of Congress Control Number: 2013946925

Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through Rights Link at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.

Printed on acid-free paper

Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) This work is dedicated to Laurie You will always be The One Preface

In August, 1945, two Army Air Force B-29 bombers each dropped single bombs on the Japanese cities of and . These new ‘‘atomic’’ bombs, colloquially known as and , each exploded with energies equivalent to over 10,000 tons of conventional explosive, the normal payload of 1,000 such bombers deployed simultaneously. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both devastated. A few days later, Japan surrendered, bringing an end to World War II. In a speech to his people on August 15, Emperor Hirohito spe- cifically referred to ‘‘a new and most cruel bomb’’ as one of the reasons for accepting surrender terms that had been laid out by the Allied powers. A later analysis by the United States Strategic Bombing Survey estimated the total number of people killed in the bombings to be about 125,000, with a further 130,000–160,000 injured. While historians continue to debate whether the bombs can be credited with directly ending the war or simply helped to hasten its end, it is irrefutable that the development and use of nuclear weapons was a watershed event of human history. In 1999, the Newseum organization of Washington, D.C., conducted a survey of journalists and the public regarding the top 100 news stories of the twentieth century. Number one on the list for both groups was the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the end of World War II. Journalists ranked the July, 1945, test of an atomic bomb in the desert of southern New Mexico as number 48, and the Manhattan Project itself, the U.S. Army’s effort under which the bombs were developed, as number 64. The Manhattan Project was the most complex and costly national-level research and development project to its time, and its legacy is enormous: America’s postwar military and political power, the and the , the thousands of nuclear weapons still held in the arsenals of various countries, the possibility of their proliferation to other states, the threat of nuclear terrorism, and public apprehension with radiation and nuclear energy all originated with the Project. These legacies will remain with us for decades to come. The development of nuclear weapons is the subject of literally thousands of books and articles, many of them carefully researched and well-written. Why, then, do I believe that the world needs one more volume on a topic that has been so exhaustively explored?

vii viii Preface

Source material on the Manhattan Project can be classed into four very broad categories. First, there are many synoptic semi-popular histories. This genre began with William Laurence’s Dawn over Zero (1946) and Stephane Groueff’s 1967 Manhattan Project: The Untold Story of the Making of the Atomic Bomb. The current outstanding example of this type of work is ’ The Making of the Atomic Bomb (1986); references to a number of others appear in the ‘‘Resource Letters’’ by myself cited in the Further Reading list at the end of this section. Second are works prepared as official government and military histories, primarily for academic scholars. The original source along this line was Henry DeWolf Smyth’s Atomic Energy for Military Purposes, which was written under War Department auspices and released just after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. More extensive later exemplars are Hewlett and Anderson’s A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Vincent Jones’ United States Army in World War II: Special Studies—Manhattan: The Army and the Atomic Bomb. Third are the numerous biographies on the leading personalities of the Project, particularly some of the scientists involved. Well over a dozen biographies have been published on Robert Oppenheimer alone. Finally, there are specialized technical publications which require readers to be armed with some upper- undergraduate or graduate-level physics and allied sciences to appreciate fully. Synoptic volumes are accessible to a broad audience, but tend to be limited in the extent of their technical coverage. Interesting as they are, one can read the same stories only so many times; eventually a curious reader must yearn for deeper knowledge: Why can only or be used to make a fission weapon? How does one compute a ? How was plutonium, which does not occur naturally, created? Official histories are superbly well-documented, but also tend to be non-technical; they are not meant to serve as student texts or popularly-accessible treatments. Biographies are not usually written to address technical matters, but here a different issue can creep in. While many biographies are responsible treatments of the life and work of the individual concerned, others devolve into questionable psychological or sociological analyses of events and motivations now decades in the past, where, not inconveniently, the principals have no opportunity to respond. Some of the synoptic-level treatments fall prey to this affliction as well. The bottom line is that after many years of teaching a college-level general- education course on the Manhattan Project, I came to the conclusion that a need exists for a broadly-comprehensible overview of the Project prepared by a phys- icist familiar with both its science and history. My goal has been to try to find a middle ground by preparing a volume that can serve as a text for a college-level science course at a basic-algebra level, while also being accessible to non-students and non-specialists who wish to learn about the Project. To this end, most chapters in this volume comprise a mixture of descriptive and technical material. For technically-oriented readers, exercises are included at the ends of some chapters. For readers who prefer to skip over mathematical treatments of technical details, the text clearly indicates where descriptive passages resume. Preface ix

Another motivation for taking on this project is that, over time, access to sensitive information regarding historically important events inevitably becomes more open. At this writing, almost 70 years have elapsed since the , 50 have passed since the publication of Hewlett and Anderson’s New World, and over 25 since Rhodes’ Making of the Atomic Bomb. In the meantime, a consid- erable number of technical and non-technical publications on the Project have appeared, and many more original documents are readily available than was the case when those authors were preparing their works. From both a personal pro- fessional perspective and an access-to-information viewpoint, the time seemed right to prepare this volume. Writing about decades-old events is a double-edged sword. Because we know how the story played out, hindsight can be perfect. We know which theories and experiments worked, and which did not. The flip side of this is that it becomes far too easy to overlook false starts and blind alleys, and set out the story in a linear this-then-that sequence that gives it all a sense of predetermined inevitability. But this would not give a due sense of the challenges faced by the people involved with the Project, so many aspects of which were so chancy that the entire effort could just as well have played no role in ending the war. After the discovery of nuclear fission, it took some of the leading research personalities of the time well over a year to appreciate how the subtleties of nuclear reactions might be exploited to make a weapon or a reactor. Even after theoretical arguments and experimental data began to become clear, technological barriers to practical realization of nuclear energy looked so overwhelming as to make the idea of a seem more appropriate to the realm of science-fiction than to real-world engi- neering. and Nobel Laureate was of the opinion that ‘‘it can never be done unless you turn the United States into one huge factory.’’ To some extent, that is exactly what was done. Again, my goal has been to seek a middle ground which gives readers some sense of the details and evolution of events, but without being overwhelming. The scale of the Manhattan Project was so great that no single-volume history of it can ever hope to be fully comprehensive. After the Project came under Army auspices in mid-1942, it split into a number of parallel components which sub- sequently proceeded to the end of the war. This parallelism obviates a strict chronological telling of the story; each main component deserves its own chapter. Thousands of other publications on this topic exist precisely because many of those components are worthy of detailed analyses in their own right. Thus, the present volume should be thought of as a gateway to an intricate, compelling story, after which an interested reader can explore any number of fascinating sub-plots in more depth. It is my sincere hope that you will enjoy, learn from, and seriously reflect upon the science and history that unfold on the following pages. I hope also that they whet your appetite for more. Sources of information on the Project are so extensive that a single individual can hope to look at but a few percent of it all; I have devoted well over a decade of my professional career to studying the Manhattan Project, and know that I still have much to learn. The future will need more x Preface

scientists and historians to serve as Manhattan Project scholars. To students reading these words, I invite you to consider making such work a part of your own career.

A Note on Sources

As much as possible, I have drawn the information in this book from primary documentary sources (see below), from works whose authors enjoyed access to classified information (Smyth, Hewlett and Anderson, Jones, and Hoddeson, et al.), from memoirs and scholarly biographies of individuals who were present at the events related, and from technical papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. A list of references appears at the end of each chapter under the heading Further Reading; a detailed list of citations can be found at www.manhattanphysics.com. One will occasionally find that even very credible sources report the details of events slightly differently: dates may vary somewhat, numerical quantities and funding amounts differ, lists of individuals involved may be more or less con- sistent, and so forth. Written records of meetings were often deliberately left incomplete. The Manhattan Project’s commander, General , fre- quently preferred to issue only verbal orders, and some information still remains classified. As a result, full understanding of some aspects of the Project is simply not possible. To fill in the gaps, it is necessary to extrapolate from what is known to have happened, and to work from the potentially fallible recollections of individuals involved. In such cases, I have tried to work with the most authoritative sources available to me, but I do not doubt that some errors and inconsistencies have crept in. For these I apologize to my readers in advance. The primary source of Manhattan Project documentary material is four sets of documents available on microfilm from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) of the United States. These comprise a total of 42 rolls of film, and readers who are motivated to explore them need to be aware that infor- mation on a given topic can be spread over multiple rolls within each of the four sets, and that documents on a given topic within a given roll by no means always appear in chronological order. Some documents that are still classified are deleted from the films. The four sets and their NARA catalog numbers are as follows: A1218: Manhattan District History (14 rolls). This massive multi-volume document was prepared as an official history of the Project after the war by Gavin Hadden, an aide to General Groves. Known to historians and researchers as the MDH, these documents are a fundamental source of information on the Project.1

1 As this book was going to press, the Department of Energy began posting the MDH online at \https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan_district.jsp[. In particular, previously redacted mate- rial on the K-25 plant (Sect. 5.4) is now being made available. Preface xi

M1108: Harrison-Bundy Files Relating to the Development of the Atomic Bomb, 1942–1946 (Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers; Record Group 77; 9 rolls). M1109: Correspondence (‘‘Top Secret’’) of the Manhattan Engineer District, 1942–1946 (Records of the Office of the Chief of Engineers; Record Group 77; 5 rolls). M1392: Bush-Conant File Relating to the Development of the Atomic Bomb, 1940–1945 (Records of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, Record Group 227; 14 rolls). An index for each set can be viewed by searching its catalog number on the NARA ordering website (select ‘‘Microfilm’’ from the tabs at the top of the page): https://eservices.archives.gov/orderonline/start.swe?SWECmd=Start&SWEHo= eservices.archives.gov.

Acknowledgments

I have benefited from spoken and electronic conversations, correspondence, sug- gestions, willingness to read and comment on draft material, and general encouragement from John Abelson, Joseph-James Ahern, Dana Aspinall, Albert Bartlett, Jeremy Bernstein, Alan Carr, David Cassidy, John Coster-Mullen, Steve Croft, Gene Deci, Eric Erpelding, Patricia Ezzell, Ed Gerjuoy, Chris Gould, Robert Hayward, Dave Hafemeister, William Lanouette, Irving Lerch, Harry Lustig, Jeffrey Marque, Albert Menard, Tony Murphy, Robert S. Norris, Klaus Rohe, Frank Settle, Ruth Sime, D. Ray Smith, Roger Stuewer, Michael Traynor, Alex Wellerstein, Bill Wilcox, John Yates, and Pete Zimmerman. If I have forgotten anybody, I apologize; know that you are in this list in spirit. Alma College interlibrary loan specialist Susan Cross has never failed to dig up any obscure document which I have requested; she is a true professional. Angela Lahee and her colleagues at Springer deserve a big nod of thanks for believing in, committing to, and seeing through this project. In addition to the individuals listed above, the fingerprints of a lifetime’s worth of family members, teachers, classmates, professors, mentors, colleagues, students, collaborators, and friends are all over these pages; a work like this is never accomplished alone. I thank them all. Over the course of several years, Alma College has generously awarded me a number of Faculty Small Grants which have gone toward developing this work, as well as a sabbatical leave during which this book was completed. Most of all I thank Laurie, who bore with it. xii Preface

Further Reading

Books, Journal Articles, and Reports

S. Groueff, Manhattan Project: The Untold Story of the Making of the Atomic Bomb. (Little, Brown and Company, New York, 1967). Reissued by Authors Guild Backprint.com (2000) R.G. Hewlett, O.E. Anderson Jr., A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Vol. 1: The New World, 1939/1946. (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 1962) L. Hoddeson, P.W.Henriksen, R.A. Meade, C.Westfall,Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos during the Oppenheimer Years, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993) V.C. Jones, United States Army in World War II: Special Studies—Manhattan: The Army and the Atomic Bomb (Center of Military History, United States Army, Washington, 1985) W.L. Laurence, Dawn over Zero: The Story of the Atomic Bomb, Knopf, (New York 1946) B.C. Reed, Resource Letter MP-1: The Manhattan Project and related nuclear research. Am. J .Phys. 73(9), 805–811 (2005) B.C. Reed, Resource Letter MP-2: The Manhattan Project and related nuclear research. Am. J. Phys. 79(2), 151–163 (2011) R. Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb, (Simon and Schuster, New York,1986) H.D. Smyth, Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb Under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940–1945. ( Press, Princeton 1945). Available electronically from a number of sources, for example, \http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/SmythReport/index.shtml[.

Websites and Web-based Documents

Newseum story on top 100 news stories of twentieth century: \http://www.newseum.org/century/[ Contents

1 Introduction and Overview...... 1 1.1 Chapters 2 and 3: The Physics...... 1 1.2 Chapter 4: Organization ...... 5 1.3 Chapters 5–7: Uranium, Plutonium, and Bomb Design and Delivery ...... 6 1.4 Chapters 8 and 9: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the Legacy of Manhattan ...... 13 Further Reading ...... 14

2 A Short History of to the Mid-1930s ...... 15 2.1 Radioactivity, Nuclei, and Transmutations: Developments to 1932 ...... 17 2.1.1 Marie Curie: Polonium, Radium, and Radioactivity . . . 19 2.1.2 Ernest Rutherford: Alpha, Beta, and Half-Life...... 20 2.1.3 Units of Energy in Nuclear Physics and the Energy of Radioactive Decay ...... 24 2.1.4 Isotopes, Mass Spectroscopy, and the Mass Defect . . . 26 2.1.5 Alpha Particles and the Nuclear Atom ...... 32 2.1.6 Reaction Notations, Q-Values, Alpha and Beta Decay, and Decay Chains ...... 36 2.1.7 Artificial Transmutation ...... 42 2.1.8 The Coulomb Barrier and Particle Accelerators ...... 44 2.2 Discovery of the Neutron ...... 50 2.3 Artificially-Induced Radioactivity ...... 56 2.4 and Neutron-Induced Radioactivity...... 57 2.5 Another Look at Mass Defect and Binding Energy (Optional) ...... 65 Exercises ...... 67 Further Reading ...... 68

3 The Discovery and Interpretation of ...... 71 3.1 The Discovery of Fission ...... 71 3.2 The Physics of Fission I: Nuclear Parity, Isotopes, and Fast and Slow Neutrons...... 85

xiii xiv Contents

3.3 The Physics of Fission II: The Fission Barrier and Chain Reactions...... 90 3.4 The Physics of Fission III: Summary ...... 95 3.5 Criticality Considered...... 97 3.6 Bohr Verified ...... 100 3.7 The Frisch-Peierls Memorandum and the ...... 102 3.8 Predicting and Producing Plutonium...... 108 Exercises ...... 113 Further Reading ...... 115

4 Organizing the Manhattan Project, 1939–1943 ...... 119 4.1 Fall 1939: Szilard, Einstein, the President, and the Uranium Committee ...... 120 4.2 June 1940: The National Defense Research Committee; Reorganization I ...... 128 4.3 May 1941: The First NAS Report ...... 131 4.4 July 1941: The Second NAS Report, MAUD, the OSRD, and Reorganization II ...... 134 4.5 October–November 1941: The Top Policy Group and the Third National Academy Report...... 139 4.6 November 1941: Bush, FDR, Reorganization III, and the Planning Board ...... 142 4.7 December 1941–January 1942: The Pile Program Rescued and Centralized...... 146 4.8 Spring 1942: Time is Very Much of the Essence, and Trouble in Chicago ...... 150 4.9 June–September 1942: The S-1 Executive Committee, the Manhattan Engineer District, and the Bohemian Grove Meeting...... 155 4.10 September 17, 1942: Groves Takes Command...... 163 4.11 December 1942: A Report to the President ...... 170 Further Reading ...... 173

5 Oak Ridge, CP-1, and the ...... 175 5.1 Oak Ridge: The Secret City ...... 176 5.2 CP-1 and X-10: The Pile Program ...... 178 5.3 Y-12: The Electromagnetic Separation Program...... 190 5.4 K-25: The Gaseous Diffusion Program ...... 203 5.5 S-50: The Thermal Diffusion Program ...... 212 5.6 The Postwar Era at Clinton ...... 222 Exercises ...... 224 Further Reading ...... 225 Contents xv

6 The Hanford Engineer Works ...... 229 6.1 Contractor and Site Selection ...... 230 6.2 Pile Design and Construction ...... 233 6.3 Fuel and Cooling Systems...... 241 6.4 Control, Instrumentation, and Safety ...... 245 6.5 Operations and Plutonium Separation ...... 247 6.6 The Postwar Era at Hanford ...... 252 Exercises ...... 253 Further Reading ...... 254

7 Los Alamos, , and Tinian ...... 257 7.1 Origins of the Laboratory ...... 258 7.2 Organizing the Work: The ...... 262 7.3 Life on the Hill ...... 269 7.4 The British Mission ...... 272 7.5 The Physics of Criticality ...... 275 7.6 Critical Assemblies: The Gun and Implosion Methods ...... 281 7.7 Predetonation Physics ...... 283 7.7.1 The (a, n) Problem...... 285 7.7.2 The Spontaneous Fission Problem ...... 289 7.8 The Delivery Program ...... 292 7.9 The Gun Bomb: Little Boy ...... 299 7.10 The Spontaneous Fission Crisis: Reorganizing the Laboratory ...... 303 7.11 The Implosion Bomb: Fat Man ...... 307 7.12 Trinity ...... 319 7.13 A Brief Tutorial on Bomb Effects ...... 343 7.13.1 Blast Pressure ...... 344 7.13.2 Thermal Burns...... 344 7.13.3 Radiation ...... 345 7.14 Project A: Preparation of Combat Bombs ...... 347 Exercises ...... 353 Further Reading ...... 355

8 Hiroshima and Nagasaki ...... 361 8.1 The : Training and Targets ...... 361 8.2 Fall 1944: Postwar Planning Begins ...... 369 8.3 President Truman Learns of the Manhattan Project ...... 372 8.4 Advice and Dissent: The , the Scientific Panel, and the ...... 375 8.5 The Bombing Missions...... 383 8.6 Effects of the Bombs ...... 405 8.7 The Aftermath ...... 409 xvi Contents

Exercises ...... 412 Further Reading ...... 413

9 The Legacy of Manhattan ...... 417 9.1 The AEC and the Fate of International Control ...... 417 9.2 Joe-1, the Super, and the P-5...... 423 9.3 A Brief Survey of Nuclear Tests and Current Deployments . . . 428 9.4 Nuclear Treaties and Stockpile Stewardship ...... 433 9.5 Epilogue ...... 437 Further Reading ...... 439

Glossary ...... 441

Index ...... 453