DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Table of contents Item 1: Opening of the Meeting 115 Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda 116 Item 3: Strategic Discussions on the Future Work of the CEP 117 CEP advice to the ATCM on the Antarctic Environments Portal 118 CEP advice to the ATCM on a symposium on the 25th anniversary of the Environment Protocol 120 Item 4: Operation of the CEP 123 CEP advice to the ATCM on opportunities to strengthen cooperation between the CEP and the ATCM 124 Item 5: Cooperation with other Organisations 125 Item 6: Repair and Remediation of Environment Damage 128 Item 7: Climate Change Implications for the Environment: Strategic approach 130 CEP advice to the ATCM on a CEP Climate Change Response Work Programme 132 CEP advice to the ATCM on Southern Ocean observations and modelling 135 Item 8: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 136 8a) Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluations 136 8b) Other EIA Matters 138 CEP advice to the ATCM on the review of the Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment in Antarctica 139 CEP advice to the ATCM on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) 144 Item 9: Area Protection and Management Plans 145 9a) Management Plans 145 CEP advice to the ATCM on revised management plans for ASPA and ASMAs: 149 9b) Historic Sites and Monuments 152 CEP advice to the ATCM on additions to the List of Historic Sites and Monuments 153 CEP advice to the ATCM on guidance for the designation of new Historic Sites and Monuments 154 9c) Site Guidelines 155 9d) Marine Spatial Protection and Management 157 9e) Other Annex V Matters 158 CEP advice to ATCM on a prior assessment process for the designation of ASPAs and ASMAs 159 Item 10: Conservation of Antarctic Flora and Fauna 162 10a) Quarantine and Non-native Species 162 10b) Specially Protected Species 166 10c) Other Annex II Matters 166 CEP advice to the ATCM on wildlife disturbance 167 CEP advice to the ATCM on Important Bird Areas in Antarctica 168 Item 11: Environmental Monitoring and Reporting 168 Item 12: Inspection Reports 170 Item 13: General Matters 174 Item 14: Election of Offi cers 174 Item 15: Preparation for Next Meeting 175 Item 16: Adoption of the Report 175 Item 17: Closing of the Meeting 175 Appendix 1. CEP Five-Year Work Plan 177 Appendix 2. Climate Change Response Work Programme 186 Appendix 3. Guidelines: A prior assessment process for the designation of ASPA and ASMAs 193 Appendix 4. Preliminary Agenda for CEP XIX 194 Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP XVIII) Sofi a, Bulgaria, June 1 – 5, 2015 (1) Pursuant to Article 11 of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, Representatives of the Parties to the Protocol (Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela) met in Sofi a, Bulgaria, from 1 to 5 June 2015, for the purpose of providing advice and formulating recommendations to the Parties in connection with the implementation of the Protocol. (2) In accordance with Rule 4 of the CEP Rules of Procedure, the meeting was also attended by representatives of the following Observers: • Contracting Parties to the Antarctic Treaty which are not a Party to the Protocol: Malaysia, Mongolia, Switzerland and Turkey; • the Scientifi c Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), the Scientifi c Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (SC-CAMLR), and the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP); and • scientifi c, environmental and technical organisations: the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Item 1: Opening of the Meeting (3) The CEP Chair, Ewan McIvor (Australia), opened the meeting on Monday 1 June 2015 and thanked Bulgaria for arranging and hosting the meeting in Sofi a. (4) The Committee expressed sincere condolences to Belgium for the sad loss of Frédéric Chemay, the late Belgian CEP Representative, who passed away in September 2014. 115 ATCM XXXVIII Final Report (5) On behalf of the Committee, the Chair welcomed Venezuela and Portugal as new Members, following their accession to the Protocol on 31 August 2014 and 10 October 2014, respectively. The Chair noted that the CEP now comprised 37 Members. (6) The Chair summarised the work undertaken during the intersessional period, noting that all the actions arising from CEP XVII with outcomes anticipated for CEP XVIII had been addressed (IP 121). Item 2: Adoption of the Agenda (7) The Committee adopted the following agenda and confi rmed the allocation of 41 Working Papers (WP), 45 Information Papers (IP), 4 Secretariat Papers (SP) and 9 Background Papers (BP) to the agenda items: 1. Opening of the Meeting 2. Adoption of the Agenda 3. Strategic Discussions on the Future Work of the CEP 4. Operation of the CEP 5. Cooperation with other Organisations 6. Repair and Remediation of Environment Damage 7. Climate Change Implications for the Environment: Strategic approach 8. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) a. Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluations b. Other EIA Matters 9. Area Protection and Management Plans a. Management Plans b. Historic Sites and Monuments c. Site Guidelines d. Marine Spatial Protection and Management e. Other Annex V Matters 10. Conservation of Antarctic Flora and Fauna a. Quarantine and Non-native Species b. Specially Protected Species c. Other Annex II Matters 116 2. CEP XVIII Report 11. Environmental Monitoring and Reporting 12. Inspection Reports 13. General Matters 14. Election of Offi cers 15. Preparation for Next Meeting 16. Adoption of the Report 17. Closing of the Meeting Item 3: Strategic Discussions on the Future Work of the CEP (8) New Zealand introduced WP 21 Antarctic Environments Portal: Project completion and next steps, and referred to IP 11 Antarctic Environmental Portal content development and editorial process, jointly prepared with Australia, Belgium, Norway, and SCAR. The papers reported on the progress made in completing the development of the Antarctic Environments Portal project since ATCM XXXVII. Intersessional work had included: promotion of the Portal during the 2014 SCAR Open Science Conference, which included the holding of an Association of Polar Early Career Scientists (APECS) workshop on the Portal; the establishment of two advisory groups to provide feedback on aspects of the Portal, and a separate workshop to test and refi ne the editorial process. New Zealand also noted that an Editor had been contracted and the Portal Editorial Group had been established which was charged with developing, reviewing and keeping up-to-date the Portal content. The Editorial Group was currently overseeing the preparation of 15 articles of direct relevance to the Committee. These articles involve contributions from 50 authors across 15 countries. New Zealand noted that the Portal was in the process of being transferred to Gateway Antarctica, at the University of Canterbury, and that an interim Management Board would be established to oversee the operation of the Portal. New Zealand further noted that a funding proposal had been submitted to an international foundation to support the operation of the Portal for the next three years. (9) The co-sponsors of the Working Paper recommended that the Committee: welcome completion of the Antarctic Environments Portal project, and indicate its support for the fi nal product; consider ways in which the Portal could be used to support its discussions, its advice to the ATCM, and its planning of future priority work; consider whether and how it might engage with the Portal 117 ATCM XXXVIII Final Report by providing Editorial Group members in the future; and, provide thoughts with regard to the potential future management of the Portal. (10) The Committee commended New Zealand, Australia, Belgium, Norway and SCAR for the considerable work undertaken since CEP XVII to further develop and complete the Antarctic Environments Portal. Members remarked on the co-proponents’ responsiveness to issues raised in discussions at previous CEP meetings, particularly the development of a rigorous editorial process to ensure the Portal contained the highest quality scientifi c information, and noted that all content was balanced and politically neutral. (11) Regarding opportunities for using the Portal to support the Committee’s discussions, it was agreed that Members could draw on the information contained in the Portal to support their work, including: for policy development; as a resource to support environmental impact assessment processes; and as a resource to inform their preparations for meetings and discussions during meetings. The Committee noted that it could suggest issues for future inclusion in the Portal relevant to issues it was addressing. (12) A query was raised on how the election of the editorial group would occur in the future, and it was noted that the future governance and management of the Portal were matters the Committee should return to at future meetings. In this regard, caution was noted regarding future funding of the Portal, and the need to ensure that the politically neutral nature of the content and the Portal’s management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mcmurdo STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study
    McMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study April 29, 2016 Final Submittal MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview PG. 7-51 Team Directory PG. 8 Project Description PG. 9 Methodology PG. 10-11 Design Criteria/Environmental Conditions PG. 12-20 (a) General Description (b) Environmental Conditions a. Wind b. Temp c. RH d. UV e. Duration of sunlight f. Air Contaminants (c) Graphic (d) Design Criteria a. Thermal b. Air Infiltration c. Moisture d. Structural e. Fire Safety f. Environmental Impact g. Corrosion/Degradation h. Durability i. Constructability j. Maintainability k. Aesthetics l. Mechanical System, Ventilation Performance and Indoor Air Quality implications m. Structural implications PG. 21-51 Benchmarking 3 Section 2: Technical Investigation and Research PG. 53-111 Envelope Components and Assemblies PG. 54-102 (a) Components a. Cladding b. Air Barrier c. Insulation d. Vapor Barrier e. Structural f. Interior Assembly (b) Assemblies a. Roofs b. Walls c. Floors Fenestration PG. 103-111 (a) Methodology (b) Window Components Research a. Window Frame b. Glazing c. Integration to skin (c) Door Components Research a. Door i. Types b. Glazing Section 3: Overall Recommendation PG. 113-141 Total Configured Assemblies PG. 114-141 (a) Roofs a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic 4 (b) Walls a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarforschungsagenda Status Und Perspektiven Der Deutschen
    Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees SCAR/IASC Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees für Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) und International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Deutsches Nationalkomitee SCAR/IASC Prof. G. Heinemann (Vorsitzender) Universität Trier, Fachbereich Raum- und Umweltwissenschaften Postanschrift: Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier Telefon: +49/651/201-4630 Telefax: +49/651/201-3817 E-Mail: [email protected] www.scar-iasc.de Juli 2017 Das vorliegende Werk wurde sorgfältig erarbeitet. Dennoch übernehmen Autoren, Herausgeber und Verlag für die Richtigkeit von Angaben, Hinweisen und Ratschlägen sowie für eventuelle Druckfehler keine Haftung. Alle Rechte, insbesondere die der Übersetzung in andere Sprachen, vorbehalten. Kein Teil dieser Publikation darf ohne schrift- liche Genehmigung des Verlages in irgendeiner Form – durch Photokopie, Mikroverfilmung oder irgendein anderes Verfahren – reproduziert oder in eine von Maschinen, insbesondere von Datenverarbeitungsmaschinen, verwendbare Sprache übertra- gen oder übersetzt werden. Die Wiedergabe von Warenbezeichnungen, Handelsnamen oder sonstigen Kennzeichen in diesem Buch berechtigt nicht zu der Annahme, dass diese von jedermann frei benutzt werden dürfen. Vielmehr kann es sich auch dann um eingetragene Warenzeichen oder sonstige gesetzlich geschützte Kennzeichen handeln, wenn sie nicht eigens als solche markiert sind. All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsf.Gov OPP: Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED A LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 23, 2012 This booklet summarizes the report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. The report was completed at the request of the White House office of science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. Front and back inside covers showing McMurdo’s Dry Valleys in Antarctica provided by Craig Dorman. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 1 The Panel ............................................... 2 Overall Assessment ................................. 3 U.S. Facilities in Antarctica ....................... 4 The Environmental Challenge .................... 7 Uncertainties in Logistics Planning ............. 8 Activities of Other Nations ....................... 9 Economic Considerations ....................... 10 Major Issues ......................................... 11 Single-Point Failure Modes ..................... 17 Recommendations ................................. 18 Concluding Observations ....................... 21 U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON,
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Total Ozone Column from Multiple Satellite Measurements in the Antarctic Using the Brewer Spectrophotometer
    remote sensing Article Evaluation of Total Ozone Column from Multiple Satellite Measurements in the Antarctic Using the Brewer Spectrophotometer Songkang Kim 1 , Sang-Jong Park 2 , Hana Lee 1 , Dha Hyun Ahn 1, Yeonjin Jung 3 , Taejin Choi 2, Bang Yong Lee 2, Seong-Joong Kim 2 and Ja-Ho Koo 1,* 1 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (D.H.A.) 2 Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Korea; [email protected] (S.-J.P.); [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (B.Y.L.); [email protected] (S.-J.K.) 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-2123-5694 Abstract: The ground-based ozone observation instrument, Brewer spectrophotometer (Brewer), was used to evaluate the quality of the total ozone column (TOC) produced by multiple polar-orbit satellite measurements at three stations in Antarctica (King Sejong, Jang Bogo, and Zhongshan stations). While all satellite TOCs showed high correlations with Brewer TOCs (R = ~0.8 to 0.9), there are some TOC differences among satellite data in austral spring, which is mainly attributed to the bias of Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) TOC. The quality of satellite TOCs is consistent between Level 2 and 3 data, implying that “which satellite TOC is used” can induce larger uncertainty than Citation: Kim, S.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, H.; “which spatial resolution is used” for the investigation of the Antarctic TOC pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Atmospheric Transport Pathways to Antarctica and the Remote Southern Ocean Using Radon-222
    feart-06-00190 November 7, 2018 Time: 16:29 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 08 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00190 Characterizing Atmospheric Transport Pathways to Antarctica and the Remote Southern Ocean Using Radon-222 Scott D. Chambers1*, Susanne Preunkert2, Rolf Weller3, Sang-Bum Hong4, Ruhi S. Humphries5,6, Laura Tositti7, Hélène Angot8, Michel Legrand2, Alastair G. Williams1, Alan D. Griffiths1, Jagoda Crawford1, Jack Simmons6, Taejin J. Choi4, Paul B. Krummel5, Suzie Molloy5, Zoë Loh5, Ian Galbally5, Stephen Wilson6, Olivier Magand2, Francesca Sprovieri9, Nicola Pirrone9 and Aurélien Dommergue2 Edited by: 1 Environmental Research, ANSTO, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2 CNRS, IRD, IGE, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France, Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova, 3 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, 4 Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, Agricultural University of Iceland, South Korea, 5 Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, VIC, Australia, 6 Centre for Iceland Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 7 Environmental Chemistry and Radioactivity Reviewed by: Lab, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 8 Institute for Data, Systems and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stephen Schery, Cambridge, MA, United States, 9 CNR-Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Monterotondo, Italy New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, United States Bijoy Vengasseril Thampi, We discuss remote terrestrial influences on boundary layer air over the Southern Science Systems and Applications, Ocean and Antarctica, and the mechanisms by which they arise, using atmospheric United States radon observations as a proxy. Our primary motivation was to enhance the scientific *Correspondence: Scott D. Chambers community’s ability to understand and quantify the potential effects of pollution, nutrient [email protected] or pollen transport from distant land masses to these remote, sparsely instrumented regions.
    [Show full text]
  • K4MZU Record WAP WACA Antarctic Program Award
    W.A.P. - W.A.C.A. Sheet (Page 1 of 10) Callsign: K4MZU Ex Call: - Country: U.S.A. Name: Robert Surname: Hines City: McDonough Address: 1978 Snapping Shoals Road Zip Code: GA-30252 Province: GA Award: 146 Send Record Sheet E-mail 23/07/2020 Check QSLs: IK1GPG & IK1QFM Date: 17/05/2012 Total Stations: 490 Tipo Award: Hunter H.R.: YES TOP H.R.: YES Date update: 23/07/2020 Date: - Date Top H.R.: - E-mail: [email protected] Ref. Call worked Date QSO Base Name o Station . ARGENTINA ARG-Ø1 LU1ZAB 15/02/1996 . Teniente Benjamin Matienzo Base (Air Force) ARG-Ø2 LU1ZE 30/01/1996 . Almirante Brown Base (Army) ARG-Ø2 LU5ZE 15/01/1982 . Almirante Brown Base (Army) ARG-Ø4 LU1ZV 17/11/1993 . Esperanza Base (Army) ARG-Ø6 LU1ZG 09/10/1990 . General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army) ARG-Ø6 LU2ZG 27/12/1981 . General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army) ARG-Ø8 LU1ZD 19/12/1993 . General San Martin Base (Army) ARG-Ø9 LU2ZD 19/01/1994 . Primavera Base (Army) (aka Capitan Cobett Base) ARG-11 LW7EYK/Z 01/02/1994 . Byers Camp (IAA) ARG-11 LW8EYK/Z 23/12/1994 . Byers Camp (IAA) ARG-12 LU1ZC 28/01/1973 . Destacamento Naval Decepción Base (Navy) ARG-12 LU2ZI 19/08/1967 . Destacamento Naval Decepción Base (Navy) ARG-13 LU1ZB 13/12/1995 . Destacamento Naval Melchior Base (Navy) ARG-15 AY1ZA 31/01/2004 . Destacamento Naval Orcadas del Sur Base (Navy) ARG-15 LU1ZA 19/02/1995 . Destacamento Naval Orcadas del Sur Base (Navy) ARG-15 LU5ZA 02/01/1983 .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation
    Proposed Construction and Operation of a New Chinese Research Station, Victoria Land, Antarctica DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION January 2014 Polar Research Institute of China Tongji University Contents CONTACT DETAILS ..................................................................................................................... 1 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Purpose of a new station in Victoria Land................................................................................................... 9 1.2 History of Chinese Antarctic activities ...................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Scientific programs for the new station ..................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Preparation and submission of the Draft CEE ........................................................................................... 22 1.5 Laws, standards and guidelines ................................................................................................................. 22 1.5.1 International laws, standards and guidelines ................................................................................. 23 1.5.2. Chinese laws, standards and guidelines ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Trade-Offs and Top-Level Design Drivers for Antarctic Greenhouses and Plant Production Facilities
    46th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2016-201 10-14 July 2016, Vienna, Austria Early Trade-offs and Top-Level Design Drivers for Antarctic Greenhouses and Plant Production Facilities Matthew T. Bamsey*, Paul Zabel†, Conrad Zeidler*, Vincent Vrakking*, Daniel Schubert* German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bremen, 28359, Germany and Eberhard Kohlberg‡ Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, 27568, Germany and Michael Stasiak§, Thomas Graham** University of Guelph, Guelph, N1G 2W1, Canada The development of plant production facilities for extreme environments presents challenges not typically faced by developers of greenhouses in more traditional environments. Antarctica represents one of the most inhospitable environments on Earth and presents unique challenges to facility developers with respect to environmental regulations, logistics, waste management, and energy use. The unique challenges associated with plant production in Antarctica heavily influence the selection of subsystem components and technologies as well as the operational paradigms used to operate the facilities. This paper details a wide array of the early design choices and trade-offs that have arisen in the development of Antarctic plant production facilities. Specific requirements and several guidelines stemming from the Antarctic Treaty’s Protocol on Environment Protection and their influence on Antarctic plant production facilities are described. A review of guidelines for Antarctic greenhouses published by several national Antarctic operators is also described. The specific technology choices of several past and present Antarctic greenhouses are summarized, as are the general operational strategies, such as solid and nutrient solution waste handling. Specific lessons learned input was compiled directly from developers and operators of a number of these facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the XXXIV ATCM
    Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Buenos Aires, 20 June – 1 July 2011 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Buenos Aires 2011 Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (34th : 2011 : Buenos Aires) Final Report of the Thirty-fourth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 20 June–1 July 2011. Buenos Aires : Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, 2011. 348 p. ISBN 978-987-1515-26-4 1. International law – Environmental issues. 2. Antarctic Treaty system. 3. Environmental law – Antarctica. 4. Environmental protection – Antarctica. DDC 341.762 5 ISBN 978-987-1515-26-4 Contents VOLUME 1 (in hard copy and CD) Acronyms and Abbreviations 9 PART I. FINAL REPORT 11 1. Final Report 13 2. CEP XIV Report 91 3. Appendices 175 Declaration on Antarctic Cooperation 177 Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XXXV 179 PART II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS 181 1. Measures 183 Measure 1 (2011) ASPA 116 (New College Valley, Caughley Beach, Cape Bird, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan 185 Measure 2 (2011) ASPA 120 (Pointe-Géologie Archipelago, Terre Adélie): Revised Management Plan 187 Measure 3 (2011) ASPA 122 (Arrival Heights, Hut Point Peninsula, Ross Island): Revised Management Plan 189 Measure 4 (2011) ASPA 126 (Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands): Revised Management Plan 191 Measure 5 (2011) ASPA 127 (Haswell Island): Revised Management Plan 193 Measure 6 (2011) ASPA 131
    [Show full text]
  • And Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness
    MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 2012 This report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness, was completed at the request of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/od/ opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN AntarctICA THROUGH INCREASED LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS REport OF THE U.S. AntarctIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL AT THE REQUEST OF THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND THE NatIONAL SCIENCE FoundatION WASHINGTON, D.C. JULY 2012 U.S. AntarctIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON, D.C. July 23, 2012 Dr. John P. Holdren Dr. Subra Suresh Assistant to the President for Science and Technology Director & Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy National Science Foundation Executive Office of the President of the United States 4201 Wilson Boulevard Washington, DC 20305 Arlington, VA 22230 Dear Dr. Holdren and Dr. Suresh: The members of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel are pleased to submit herewith our final report entitled More and Better Science in Antarctica through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. Not only is the U.S. logistics system supporting our nation’s activities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean the essential enabler for our presence and scientific accomplish- ments in that region, it is also the dominant consumer of the funds allocated to those endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Thirty-Eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting
    Final Report of the Thirty-eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Final Report of the Thirty-eighth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Sofi a, Bulgaria 1 - 10 June 2015 Volume I Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Buenos Aires 2015 Published by: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Secrétariat du Traité sur l’ Antarctique Секретариат Договора об Антарктике Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Maipú 757, Piso 4 C1006ACI Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires - Argentina Tel: +54 11 4320 4260 Fax: +54 11 4320 4253 This book is also available from: www.ats.aq (digital version) and for purchase online. ISSN 2346-9897 ISBN 978-987-1515-98-1 Contents VOLUME I Acronyms and Abbreviations 9 PART I. FINAL REPORT 11 1. Final Report 13 2. CEP XVIII Report 111 3. Appendices 195 Outcomes of the Intersessional Contact Group on Informatiom Exchange Requirements 197 Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XXXIX, Working Groups and Allocation of Items 201 Host Country Communique 203 PART II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS 205 1. Measures 207 Measure 1 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 101 (Taylor Rookery, Mac.Robertson Land): Revised Management Plan 209 Measure 2 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 102 (Rookery Islands, Holme Bay, Mac.Robertson Land): Revised Management Plan 211 Measure 3 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 103 (Ardery Island and Odbert Island, Budd Coast, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica): Revised Management Plan 213 Measure 4 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 104 (Sabrina Island, Balleny Islands): Revised Management Plan 215 Measure 5 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 105 (Beaufort Island, McMurdo Sound, Ross Sea): Revised Management Plan 217 Measure 6 (2015): Antarctic Specially Protected Area No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Categorization of the Most Recent Research Projects in Antarctica
    Percentage of seasonal population at the research station 25% 75% N o r w a y C Population in summer l a A categorization of the most recent i m Population in winter research projects in Antarctica Goals of research projects (based on describtion of NSF U.S. Antarctic Program) Projects that are trying to understand the region and its ecosystem Orcadas Station (Argentina) Projects that using the region as a platform to study the upper space i m Signy Station (UK) a and atomosphere l lf Fimbul Ice She Projects that are uncovering the regions’ BASIS OF THE CATEGORIZATION C La SANAE IV Station P r zar effect and repsonse to global processes i n ev a (South Africa) c e Ice such as climate This map categorizes the most recent research projects into three s s Sh n A s t elf i King Sejong Station r i d t (South Korea) Troll Station groups based on the goals of the projects. The three categories tha Syowa Station n Mar (Norway) Pr incess inc (Japan) e Pr ess 14 projects are: projects that are developed to understand the Antarctic g Rag nhi r d e ld Molodezhnaya n c a I Isl Station (Russia) 2 projects A lle n region and its ecosystems, projects that use the region as a oinvi e DRONNING MAUD J s R 3 projects r i a is n L er_Larse G Marambio Station - er R s platform to study the upper atmosphere and space, and (Argentina) ii A R H ENDERBY projects that are uncovering Antarctica’s effects on (and A d Number of research projects M n Mizuho Station sla Halley Station er I i Research stations L ss (Norway) p mes Ro (UK) Na responses to) global processes such as climate.
    [Show full text]