DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation Proposed Construction and Operation of a New Chinese Research Station, Victoria Land, Antarctica DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION January 2014 Polar Research Institute of China Tongji University Contents CONTACT DETAILS ..................................................................................................................... 1 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Purpose of a new station in Victoria Land................................................................................................... 9 1.2 History of Chinese Antarctic activities ...................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Scientific programs for the new station ..................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Preparation and submission of the Draft CEE ........................................................................................... 22 1.5 Laws, standards and guidelines ................................................................................................................. 22 1.5.1 International laws, standards and guidelines ................................................................................. 23 1.5.2. Chinese laws, standards and guidelines ....................................................................................... 23 1.6 Project management system ...................................................................................................................... 24 1.7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 25 2. Description of Proposed Activity ......................................................................................... 29 2.1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 2.2 Location .................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Follow-up site selection ............................................................................................................................ 31 2.4 Principal characteristics of proposed activities ......................................................................................... 31 2.4.1 General specification of the station ............................................................................................... 32 2.4.2 Materials and personnel required .................................................................................................. 33 2.4.3 The mode of transport ................................................................................................................... 35 2.4.4 Medical security system ................................................................................................................ 38 2.5. Station construction and operation plan ................................................................................................... 38 2.5.1 Principles for design and construction .......................................................................................... 39 2.5.2 Station layout ................................................................................................................................ 40 2.5.3 Scale and functional zoning .......................................................................................................... 44 2.5.4 Fuel storage system ....................................................................................................................... 49 2.5.5 Water supply system ..................................................................................................................... 50 2.5.6 Waste water treatment and grey water recycling system ............................................................... 53 2.5.7 Hybrid Solar- Wind-Diesel power supply system ......................................................................... 56 2.5.8 Heating and ventilation system ..................................................................................................... 63 2.5.9 Structure and foundation ............................................................................................................... 69 2.5.10 Emergency facilities ................................................................................................................... 71 2.5.11 Special machineries .................................................................................................................... 72 2.5.12 Floating dock design and operation ............................................................................................ 73 2.5.13 Test and acceptance .................................................................................................................... 77 2.5.14 Transportation during construction period .................................................................................. 77 2.5.15 Engineering work in situ ............................................................................................................. 78 2.5.16 Upgradeability ............................................................................................................................ 78 2.5.17 Archive management .................................................................................................................. 78 2.5.18 Decommission of the station ....................................................................................................... 78 2.5.19 Objectives of minimum environmental impact ........................................................................... 79 2.6 Area of disturbance ................................................................................................................................... 80 2.6.1 Operation area ............................................................................................................................... 80 2.6.2 Duration and intensity of the construction .................................................................................... 80 2.6.3 Measures in line with standards .................................................................................................... 80 2.7 Waste collection and disposal system ....................................................................................................... 81 2.7.1 Waste sorting ................................................................................................................................ 81 2.7.2 Fuel drums .................................................................................................................................... 83 2.7.3 Hazardous wastes.......................................................................................................................... 83 3. Alternatives to the Proposed Activity .................................................................................. 84 3.1. No-action Alternative ............................................................................................................................... 84 3.2. Alternative locations around Ross Sea region .......................................................................................... 85 3.2.1 Description of proposed location 1 in the Oates Coast region ...................................................... 86 3.2.2 Description of proposed location 2 near Terra Nova Bay of Victoria Land .................................. 88 3.2.3 Description of proposed location 3 near the Cape Berks of Marie Byrd Land .............................. 89 3.2.4 Comparison of the proposed three locations ................................................................................. 90 3.3. Alternative sites on Inexpressible Island near Terra Nova Bay of Victoria Land ..................................... 91 3.4. Alternative designs ................................................................................................................................... 96 3.4.1 Alternative designs of layout ........................................................................................................ 96 3.4.2 Exterior designs ............................................................................................................................ 97 3.5. Transport alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 99 3.5.1 Air plus land transportation ......................................................................................................... 100 3.5.2 Marine plus land transportation .................................................................................................. 100 3.5.3 Evaluation of means of Transportation Alternatives ................................................................... 100 3.6. Wind turbine alternatives ....................................................................................................................... 101 3.7. Alternative waste management plans ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multi-Year Record of Atmospheric Mercury at Dumont D'urville, East Antarctic Coast: Continental Outflow and Oceanic Influences
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., doi:10.5194/acp-2016-257, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Published: 1 April 2016 c Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License. 1 Multi-year record of atmospheric mercury at Dumont 2 d’Urville, East Antarctic coast: continental outflow and 3 oceanic influences 4 5 Hélène Angot 1, Iris Dion 1, Nicolas Vogel 1, Michel Legrand 1, 2 , Olivier Magand 2, 1, 6 Aurélien Dommergue 1, 2 7 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement 8 (LGGE), 38041 Grenoble, France 9 2CNRS, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement (LGGE), 38041 10 Grenoble, France 11 Correspondence to: A. Dommergue ([email protected]) 12 13 Abstract 14 Under the framework of the Global Mercury Observation System (GMOS) project, a 3.5-year 15 record of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (Hg(0)) has been gathered at Dumont 16 d’Urville (DDU, 66°40’S, 140°01’E, 43 m above sea level) on the East Antarctic coast. 17 Additionally, surface snow samples were collected in February 2009 during a traverse 18 between Concordia Station located on the East Antarctic plateau and DDU. The record of 19 atmospheric Hg(0) at DDU reveals particularities that are not seen at other coastal sites: a 20 gradual decrease of concentrations over the course of winter, and a daily maximum 21 concentration around midday in summer. Additionally, total mercury concentrations in 22 surface snow samples were particularly elevated near DDU (up to 194.4 ng L-1) as compared 23 to measurements at other coastal Antarctic sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ross Sea Dipole - Temperature, Snow Accumulation and Sea Ice Variability in the Ross Sea Region, Antarctica, Over the Past 2,700 Years
    Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2017-95 Manuscript under review for journal Clim. Past Discussion started: 1 August 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC BY 4.0 License. The Ross Sea Dipole - Temperature, Snow Accumulation and Sea Ice Variability in the Ross Sea Region, Antarctica, over the Past 2,700 Years 5 RICE Community (Nancy A.N. Bertler1,2, Howard Conway3, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen4, Daniel B. Emanuelsson1,2, Mai Winstrup4, Paul T. Vallelonga4, James E. Lee5, Ed J. Brook5, Jeffrey P. Severinghaus6, Taylor J. Fudge3, Elizabeth D. Keller2, W. Troy Baisden2, Richard C.A. Hindmarsh7, Peter D. Neff8, Thomas Blunier4, Ross Edwards9, Paul A. Mayewski10, Sepp Kipfstuhl11, Christo Buizert5, Silvia Canessa2, Ruzica Dadic1, Helle 10 A. Kjær4, Andrei Kurbatov10, Dongqi Zhang12,13, Ed D. Waddington3, Giovanni Baccolo14, Thomas Beers10, Hannah J. Brightley1,2, Lionel Carter1, David Clemens-Sewall15, Viorela G. Ciobanu4, Barbara Delmonte14, Lukas Eling1,2, Aja A. Ellis16, Shruthi Ganesh17, Nicholas R. Golledge1,2, Skylar Haines10, Michael Handley10, Robert L. Hawley15, Chad M. Hogan18, Katelyn M. Johnson1,2, Elena Korotkikh10, Daniel P. Lowry1, Darcy Mandeno1, Robert M. McKay1, James A. Menking5, Timothy R. Naish1, 15 Caroline Noerling11, Agathe Ollive19, Anaïs Orsi20, Bernadette C. Proemse18, Alexander R. Pyne1, Rebecca L. Pyne2, James Renwick1, Reed P. Scherer21, Stefanie Semper22, M. Simonsen4, Sharon B. Sneed10, Eric J., Steig3, Andrea Tuohy23, Abhijith Ulayottil Venugopal1,2, Fernando Valero-Delgado11, Janani Venkatesh17, Feitang Wang24, Shimeng
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmurdo STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study
    McMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study April 29, 2016 Final Submittal MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview PG. 7-51 Team Directory PG. 8 Project Description PG. 9 Methodology PG. 10-11 Design Criteria/Environmental Conditions PG. 12-20 (a) General Description (b) Environmental Conditions a. Wind b. Temp c. RH d. UV e. Duration of sunlight f. Air Contaminants (c) Graphic (d) Design Criteria a. Thermal b. Air Infiltration c. Moisture d. Structural e. Fire Safety f. Environmental Impact g. Corrosion/Degradation h. Durability i. Constructability j. Maintainability k. Aesthetics l. Mechanical System, Ventilation Performance and Indoor Air Quality implications m. Structural implications PG. 21-51 Benchmarking 3 Section 2: Technical Investigation and Research PG. 53-111 Envelope Components and Assemblies PG. 54-102 (a) Components a. Cladding b. Air Barrier c. Insulation d. Vapor Barrier e. Structural f. Interior Assembly (b) Assemblies a. Roofs b. Walls c. Floors Fenestration PG. 103-111 (a) Methodology (b) Window Components Research a. Window Frame b. Glazing c. Integration to skin (c) Door Components Research a. Door i. Types b. Glazing Section 3: Overall Recommendation PG. 113-141 Total Configured Assemblies PG. 114-141 (a) Roofs a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic 4 (b) Walls a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarforschungsagenda Status Und Perspektiven Der Deutschen
    Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees SCAR/IASC Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees für Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) und International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Deutsches Nationalkomitee SCAR/IASC Prof. G. Heinemann (Vorsitzender) Universität Trier, Fachbereich Raum- und Umweltwissenschaften Postanschrift: Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier Telefon: +49/651/201-4630 Telefax: +49/651/201-3817 E-Mail: [email protected] www.scar-iasc.de Juli 2017 Das vorliegende Werk wurde sorgfältig erarbeitet. Dennoch übernehmen Autoren, Herausgeber und Verlag für die Richtigkeit von Angaben, Hinweisen und Ratschlägen sowie für eventuelle Druckfehler keine Haftung. Alle Rechte, insbesondere die der Übersetzung in andere Sprachen, vorbehalten. Kein Teil dieser Publikation darf ohne schrift- liche Genehmigung des Verlages in irgendeiner Form – durch Photokopie, Mikroverfilmung oder irgendein anderes Verfahren – reproduziert oder in eine von Maschinen, insbesondere von Datenverarbeitungsmaschinen, verwendbare Sprache übertra- gen oder übersetzt werden. Die Wiedergabe von Warenbezeichnungen, Handelsnamen oder sonstigen Kennzeichen in diesem Buch berechtigt nicht zu der Annahme, dass diese von jedermann frei benutzt werden dürfen. Vielmehr kann es sich auch dann um eingetragene Warenzeichen oder sonstige gesetzlich geschützte Kennzeichen handeln, wenn sie nicht eigens als solche markiert sind. All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes Fosteri)
    SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT EMPEROR PENGUIN (APTENODYTES FOSTERI) Emperor penguin chicks being socialized by male parents at Auster Rookery, 2008. Photo Credit: Gary Miller, Australian Antarctic Program. Version 1.0 December 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Program Branch of Delisting and Foreign Species Falls Church, Virginia Acknowledgements: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penguins are flightless birds that are highly adapted for the marine environment. The emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) is the tallest and heaviest of all living penguin species. Emperors are near the top of the Southern Ocean’s food chain and primarily consume Antarctic silverfish, Antarctic krill, and squid. They are excellent swimmers and can dive to great depths. The average life span of emperor penguin in the wild is 15 to 20 years. Emperor penguins currently breed at 61 colonies located around Antarctica, with the largest colonies in the Ross Sea and Weddell Sea. The total population size is estimated at approximately 270,000–280,000 breeding pairs or 625,000–650,000 total birds. Emperor penguin depends upon stable fast ice throughout their 8–9 month breeding season to complete the rearing of its single chick. They are the only warm-blooded Antarctic species that breeds during the austral winter and therefore uniquely adapted to its environment. Breeding colonies mainly occur on fast ice, close to the coast or closely offshore, and amongst closely packed grounded icebergs that prevent ice breaking out during the breeding season and provide shelter from the wind. Sea ice extent in the Southern Ocean has undergone considerable inter-annual variability over the last 40 years, although with much greater inter-annual variability in the five sectors than for the Southern Ocean as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsf.Gov OPP: Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED A LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 23, 2012 This booklet summarizes the report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. The report was completed at the request of the White House office of science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. Front and back inside covers showing McMurdo’s Dry Valleys in Antarctica provided by Craig Dorman. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 1 The Panel ............................................... 2 Overall Assessment ................................. 3 U.S. Facilities in Antarctica ....................... 4 The Environmental Challenge .................... 7 Uncertainties in Logistics Planning ............. 8 Activities of Other Nations ....................... 9 Economic Considerations ....................... 10 Major Issues ......................................... 11 Single-Point Failure Modes ..................... 17 Recommendations ................................. 18 Concluding Observations ....................... 21 U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON,
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Caves of Terra Nova Bay (Victoria Land, Antarctica)
    SPECIALE GLACIER CAVES NIMBUS 23-24 Ice Caves of Terra Nova Bay (Victoria Land, Antarctica) Mirco Meneghel - Dipartimento di Geografia, University of Padova, Italy Giovanni Badino - Dipartimento di Fisica Generale, University of Torino, Italy Associazione La Venta Abstract Baia Terra Nova, sulla costa occi- wider Terra Nova Bay, on the we- In the 2000/2001 expedition of dentale del Mare di Ross. Sono stern coast of the Ross Sea, at 74° the Italian Programme of Resear- state esplorate tre grotte nella 41' 42" S lat. and 164° 07' 23" E ch in Antarctica (PNRA) an inve- fronte dei ghiacciai al contatto col long. The Transantarctic Mts, stigation on the presence of ca- mare e un'altra sulla sommità del whose relief is often higher than ves in ice has been carried out monte Melbourne, un cono vulca- 3000 m, fringe the coast. South near the Italian Station of Terra nico di 2700 metri di altezza. Le of the Base the mountain chaine Nova Bay, on the western coast of grotte sulla costa sono crepacci is crossed by outlet glaciers that the Ross Sea (Northern Victoria ampliati dalla sublimazione del drain the ice of the inlandsis. On Land). Three caves have been ex- ghiaccio a causa della differenza the north huge valley glaciers plored at the snout of glaciers di temperatura fra il ghiaccio e flow from the mountains to the reaching the sea and an other l'acqua marina. La grotta subgla- sea. The Italian Base is placed one on the summit of Mt Mel- ciale sul monte Melbourne è ge- between the region of the Dry bourne, a volcanic cone 2700 m nerata dal calore delle rocce vul- Valleys to the south, where broad 1 - Below - high.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapporto Sulla Campagna Antartica Estate Australe 1998-99 PROGETTO ANTARTIDE
    PROGRAMMA NAZIONALE DI RICERCHE IN ANTARTIDE Rapporto sulla Campagna Antartica Estate Australe 1998-99 Quattordicesima Spedizione PROGETTO ANTARTIDE ANT 99/04 PROGRAMMA NAZIONALE DI RICERCHE IN ANTARTIDE Rapporto sulla Campagna Antartica Estate Australe 1998-99 Quattordicesima Spedizione A cura di Tiziana Pugliatti e M. Chiara Ramorino PROGETTO ANTARTIDE ENEA - Progetto Antartide Via Anguillarese, 301 c.p. 2400, 00100 Roma A.D. Tel.: 0630484816, Fax: 0630484893, E-mail:[email protected] Sito WEB: http://www2.pnra.it Indice I N D I C E PREMESSA........................................................................................................................................................v ATTIVITA’ A BAIA TERRA NOVA E PRESSO ALTRE BASI SETTORE 1 - EVOLUZIONE GEOLOGICA DEL CONTINENTE ANTARTICO E DELL'OCEANO MERIDIONALE Area Tematica 1a Evoluzione Geologica del Continente Antartico Progetto 1a.2 Evoluzione mesozoica e cenozoica del Mare di Ross e aree adiacenti..................3 Progetto 1a.4 Cartografia geologica, geomorfologica e geofisica .................................................3 Progetto 1a.5 Cape Roberts ..........................................................................................................6 SETTORE 2 - GLOBAL CHANGE Sottosettore 2a - Glaciologia e Paleoclima Area Tematica 2a.1 Glaciologia e Paleoclima Progetto 2a.1.1 Bilancio di massa, monitoraggio e studio paleoclimatico della calotta antartica orientale - settore pacifico ......................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroacoustic, Meteorologic and Seismic Observations of the 2016 Nansen Ice Shelf Calving Event and Iceberg Formation
    feart-07-00183 July 13, 2019 Time: 15:27 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 16 July 2019 doi: 10.3389/feart.2019.00183 Hydroacoustic, Meteorologic and Seismic Observations of the 2016 Nansen Ice Shelf Calving Event and Iceberg Formation R. P. Dziak1*, W. S. Lee2, J. H. Haxel3, H. Matsumoto3, G. Tepp4, T.-K. Lau3, L. Roche3, S. Yun2, C.-K. Lee2*, J. Lee2 and S.-T. Yoon2 1 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Newport, OR, United States, 2 Unit of Ice Sheet and Sea Level Changes, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, South Korea, 3 Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, United States, 4 U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory, Anchorage, AK, United States On April 7, 2016 the Nansen ice shelf (NIS) front calved into two icebergs, the first large- scale calving event in >30 years. Three hydrophone moorings were deployed seaward of the NIS in December 2015 and over the following months recorded hundreds of short Edited by: Shin Sugiyama, duration, broadband (10–400 Hz) cryogenic signals, likely caused by fracturing of the ice Hokkaido University, Japan shelf. The majority of these icequakes occurred between January and early March 2016, Reviewed by: several weeks prior to the calving observed by satellite on April 7. Barometric pressure Jake Walter, and wind speed records show the day the icebergs drifted from the NIS coincided with University of Oklahoma, United States the largest low-pressure storm system recorded in the previous 7 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Size Distribution and Ionic Composition of Marine Summer Aerosol at the Continental Antarctic Site Kohnen
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2413–2430, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2413-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Size distribution and ionic composition of marine summer aerosol at the continental Antarctic site Kohnen Rolf Weller1, Michel Legrand2, and Susanne Preunkert2 1Glaciology Department, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 2Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement (LGGE), Grenoble, France Correspondence: Rolf Weller ([email protected]) Received: 27 June 2017 – Discussion started: 25 October 2017 Revised: 21 December 2017 – Accepted: 22 January 2018 – Published: 19 February 2018 Abstract. We measured aerosol size distributions and con- were associated with enhanced marine aerosol entry, aerosol ducted bulk and size-segregated aerosol sampling dur- deposition on-site during austral summer should be largely ing two summer campaigns in January 2015 and January dominated by typical steady clear sky conditions. 2016 at the continental Antarctic station Kohnen (Dron- ning Maud Land). Physical and chemical aerosol prop- erties differ conspicuously during the episodic impact of a distinctive low-pressure system in 2015 (LPS15) com- 1 Introduction pared to the prevailing clear sky conditions. The approx- imately 3-day LPS15 located in the eastern Weddell Sea The impact of aerosols on global climate, which is in partic- was associated with the following: marine boundary layer ular mediated by governing cloud droplet concentrations and air mass intrusion; enhanced condensation particle con- hence cloud optical properties (Rosenfeld et al., 2014; Sein- centrations (1400 ± 700 cm−3 compared to 250 ± 120 cm−3 feld et al., 2016), is of crucial importance but likewise no- under clear sky conditions; mean ± SD); the occurrence toriously charged with the largest uncertainties (Boucher et of a new particle formation event exhibiting a continu- al., 2013; Seinfeld et al., 2016).
    [Show full text]