DOCSLIB.ORG

Scientific Programme Tuesday, 19 June 2018 Opening Ceremony C I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

POLAR2018 A SCAR & IASC Conference June 15 - 26, 2018 Davos, Switzerland Open Science Conference OSC 19 - 23 June 2018 Scientific Programme Tuesday, 19 June 2018 Plenary Events 08:00 - 09:00 A Davos (Plenary) Opening Ceremony Opening Ceremony SCAR & IASC 8.00 Martin Schneebeli (POLAR2018 Scientific Steering Committee Chair) 8.10 Okalik Eegeesiak (Chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Council) 8.20 IASC President (to be elected during the business meetings) 8.30 Kelly Falkner (COMNAP President) 8.40 Steven Chown (SCAR President) 8.50 end of the event and distribution to parallel session rooms COMNAP + Mini-Symposia 09:00 - 10:30 C Aspen C I COMNAP Open Session I The Critical Science/Science Support Nexus Through a SCAR process, the Antarctic research community scanned the horizon to develop a list of the 80 most critical questions likely to need answered in the mid-term future. Afterwards, through COMNAP, the research support community outlined what would be needed to overcome the practical and technical challenges of supporting the research community to the extent needed to answer those critical questions. Throughout both processes, one message came through loud and clear: to be successful in the Antarctic, the research support community and the research community must work hand-in-hand, often over long periods of time and under a diverse range of circumstances and must be clear in their cross-communication of needs, expectations, risks and opportunities. This session looks at nexus between the research support community and the researchers by way of two current projects which are using unconventional methods of logistics and operations, both being supported away from permanent polar infrastructure. The first example is from an Arctic project already well-advanced in planning; and the second from an Antarctic project in its early stages of implementation. Hear about what it takes to get large, multi-year, multi- national projects off the ground and keep them up and running and contribute to the conversation between researcher & National Antarctic Program so that together we can achieve success. Keywords: International collaboration; logistics; traverse; infrastructure; science support Chair: Rogan-Finnemore, Michelle (New Zealand) The Antarctic Roadmap Challenges (ARC) Project: How We Will Enable the 09:00 - 09:15 Research Presenter: Rogan-Finnemore, Michelle (New Zealand) Multidisciplinary Drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate 09:15 - 09:30 (MOSAiC) Presenter: Rex, Markus (Germany) Planning Logistics Support for MOSAiC: We Want Our Vessel to Get Stuck 09:30 - 09:45 in Ice! Presenter: Nixdorf, Uwe (Germany) Vulnerability of the Ross Ice Shelf in a Warming World 09:45 - 10:00 Presenter: Hulbe, Christina (New Zealand) Page 1 / 246 POLAR2018 A SCAR & IASC Conference June 15 - 26, 2018 Davos, Switzerland Open Science Conference OSC 19 - 23 June 2018 Scientific Programme Traverses, Town Planning, Space Travel & Ice Shelfs…What Do They Have 10:00 - 10:15 in Common? Presenter: Trotter, Simon (New Zealand) COMNAP C I Panel Discussion 10:15 - 10:30 Session Block 09:00 - 10:30 A Studio AA-1a Astrophysics and Astronomy in the Polar Regions The Polar Regions provide unique viewing locations for exploring the Universe. This session invites contributions from current and proposed astronomy and astrophysics research projects in the Arctic and Antarctic. The session will be a forum to learn about the science potential of these regions, and techniques for c onducting research in extreme environments including ground-based and balloon-borne experiments. We encourage talks from early career scientists and nations who have recently joined SCAR and IASC as associate members, along with presentations from more established researchers to provide opportunities for mentoring and building collaborations to leverage the investment in scientific infrastructure in the Polar Regions. Talks involving polar research in Astronomyand Astrophysics are also encouraged. Chair: Shang, Zhaohui (China) A 76 Day Period G-M Eclipsing Binary Discovered from Dome C, Antarctica 09:00 - 09:15 Presenter: Crouzet, Nicolas (Spain) Pulsations and Planetary Transit Events of Beta Pictoris as Observed by 09:15 - 09:30 ASTEP Presenter: Mékarnia, Djamel (France) Exoplanets in the Antarctic Sky 09:30 - 09:45 Presenter: Zhang, Hui (China) Optical Observations of LIGO Source GW 170817 by the ASTs at Dome A, 09:45 - 10:00 Antarctica Presenter: Gong, Xuefei (China) Measuring Atmospheric Turbulence at Dome A, Antarctica with AST3 10:00 - 10:15 Presenter: Ma, Bin (China) Meteorological Data from KLAWS-2G for Site Testing at Dome A, 10:15 - 10:30 Antarctica Presenter: Hu, Yi (China) Page 2 / 246 POLAR2018 A SCAR & IASC Conference June 15 - 26, 2018 Davos, Switzerland Open Science Conference OSC 19 - 23 June 2018 Scientific Programme Session Block 09:00 - 10:30 A Forum OS-6a Polar Ocean Dynamics Understanding the polar ocean circulation and its interaction with the cryosphere and biogeochemical processes is critical to improve our knowledge of heat, freshwater, energy and carbon budgets, as well as sea level rise and ocean productivity. The Arctic and the Southern Oceans are affected by large scale annular modes of atmospheric variability, have large ice-covered regions, are bordered by ice-sheets and support strong boundary current systems. Dynamically, these flow regimes experience a small Rossby deformation radius, regions of extreme vertical stratification, strong interactions with bathymetry, and eddy variability that influences both mean and transient properties of the large-scale circulation. Despite these similarities, important differences in the behavior of the two regions have been observed, including sea ice trends from recent decades of opposite signs. Differences in ocean stratification, mixed layer processes, bathymetric geometry, and surface forcing have been suggested as possible causes for the distinct natures of the two regions.In this session, we invite contributions on all physical oceanographic aspects of the Arctic or the Southern Ocean (or ideally both), based on observations, numerical models or theory. Contributions that explore how the ocean impacts the wider polar system, including air-sea exchange, sea ice, ice shelf evolution, biogeochemical cycling and other broad features of the high-latitude climate system, are especially welcome. Chair: Thompson, Andrew (United States) Southern Ocean Air-sea Fluxes: An Overview and Contrasts with the 09:00 - 09:15 Arctic Presenter: Josey, Simon (United Kingdom) PIPERS: Ocean Observations during an Anomalous Autumn-winter in the 09:15 - 09:30 Ross Sea Presenter: Stammerjohn, Sharon (United States) Ocean Forcing of Pine Island Glacier Melt Rate on Weekly to Monthly 09:30 - 09:45 Time Scales Presenter: Davis, Peter (United Kingdom) Using Noble Gases to Show Upper Ocean Glacial Meltwater in the 09:45 - 10:00 Amundsen Sea Presenter: Biddle, Louise (Sweden) Convection in the Southern Ocean - What Controls it? 10:00 - 10:15 Presenter: Behrens, Erik (New Zealand) Preconditioning of the Weddell Sea Polynya by the Ocean Mesoscale and 10:15 - 10:30 Overflows Presenter: Dufour, Carolina O. (Canada) Page 3 / 246 POLAR2018 A SCAR & IASC Conference June 15 - 26, 2018 Davos, Switzerland Open Science Conference OSC 19 - 23 June 2018 Scientific Programme Session Block 09:00 - 10:30 A Dischma BE-1a From boots to bytes: ‘omics’ tools for microbial diversity and biogeography This session invites comparative studies using high-throughput ‘omics’ techniques to resolve large-scale microbial diversity and biogeographic patterns across the three poles (Arctic, Antarctic and mountain regions). The session concentrates on the microbial and viral diversity, ideally comparing at least two geographic regions. All freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems are included, such as meltwater ponds, streams, perennially ice-covered lakes and supraglacial ecosystems as well as soils, glacier forefields and other terrestrial and aquatic biotopes. ‘Omics’ techniques are encouraged, but more traditional methods can also be accepted and methodologies can be discussed.The terrestrial habitats of the three poles have strikingly similar physical properties. The harsh conditions permit the survival of a limited selection of (micro) organisms. Yet, their diversity and biogeographic patterns are still unresolved. The aim of this session therefore is to go beyond descriptive and geographically limited studies and to encourage broad, comparative and process-oriented research towards large-scale biogeographic patterns, environment-diversity relationships, and ecological drivers of diversity patterns. This may also include studies on natural and anthropogenic dispersal pathways, ecological niches as well as present and future climatic-driven habitat and diversity change. Chair: Jungblut, Anne D. (United Kingdom) Chair: Kleinteich, Julia Some Like it Hot: Metagenomics of an Isolated Antarctic Geothermal 09:00 - 09:15 Refugium Presenter: Cary, Stephen Craig (New Zealand) Dynamics of Microbial Community Succession in Polar Deglaciated 09:15 - 09:30 Forefields Presenter: de los Rios, Asuncion (Spain) Cyanobacterial Diversity from Pole to Pole: Metagenome of Arctic and 09:30 - 09:45 Antarctic Presenter: Wan Omar, Wan Maznah (Malaysia) Biogeography of Cyanobacteria in Antarctic Mats and Implication for 09:45 - 10:00 Conservation Presenter: Durieu, Benoit (Belgium) Did Antarctic Lichens Originate in, or Arrive to, Antarctica? 10:00 - 10:15 Presenter: Garrido-Benavent,
Recommended publications
  • The Antarctic Treaty System And

    The Antarctic Treaty System And

    The Antarctic Treaty System and Law During the first half of the 20th century a series of territorial claims were made to parts of Antarctica, including New Zealand's claim to the Ross Dependency in 1923. These claims created significant international political tension over Antarctica which was compounded by military activities in the region by several nations during the Second World War. These tensions were eased by the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957-58, the first substantial multi-national programme of scientific research in Antarctica. The IGY was pivotal not only in recognising the scientific value of Antarctica, but also in promoting co- operation among nations active in the region. The outstanding success of the IGY led to a series of negotiations to find a solution to the political disputes surrounding the continent. The outcome to these negotiations was the Antarctic Treaty. The Antarctic Treaty The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on 1 December 1959 by the twelve nations that had been active during the IGY (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States and USSR). It entered into force on 23 June 1961. The Treaty, which applies to all land and ice-shelves south of 60° South latitude, is remarkably short for an international agreement – just 14 articles long. The twelve nations that adopted the Treaty in 1959 recognised that "it is in the interests of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord".
  • Report of Contributions

    Report of Contributions

    The 8th International Ice Drill Symposium Report of Contributions https://indico.nbi.ku.dk/e/1121 The 8th Internati … / Report of Contributions Impurities effect on borehole closu … Contribution ID: 2 Type: Poster Impurities effect on borehole closure rate in ice sheet Monday, 30 September 2019 17:56 (4 minutes) Understanding ice sheet dynamics is of high interest to predict the future ice sheet response in times of changing climate, and is also crucial to estimate borehole closure rate during accessing ice sheet especially by deep ice core drilling. Impurities in ice is one of the most influential factors on mechanical properties of ice and causes localized enhanced deformation. High concentrations of impurities is the main driver for development of strong crystal prefrred orientation, fine grain sizes and for decreasing pressure melting point, which favors the borehole clousre rate signaficantly particularly when ice temperature is above -10 ℃. While the control mechanism of impurities on ice deformation rate is still remains much unclear. Thus, we propose to investigate various species and concentrations of impurities effect on ice creep rate between -15 ℃ to -5 ℃ using bubble free, labratory-made polycrystalline ice obtained by isotropic freezing method, in order to figure out the critical species and concentrations of impurities on borehole closure rate. Primary author: HONG, Jialin (Polar Research Center, Jilin University, Changchun, China) Co-authors: Prof. TALALAY, Pavel (Jilin University); Mr SYSOEV, Mihail (Polar Research Center,
  • Mcmurdo STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study

    Mcmurdo STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study

    McMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study April 29, 2016 Final Submittal MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview PG. 7-51 Team Directory PG. 8 Project Description PG. 9 Methodology PG. 10-11 Design Criteria/Environmental Conditions PG. 12-20 (a) General Description (b) Environmental Conditions a. Wind b. Temp c. RH d. UV e. Duration of sunlight f. Air Contaminants (c) Graphic (d) Design Criteria a. Thermal b. Air Infiltration c. Moisture d. Structural e. Fire Safety f. Environmental Impact g. Corrosion/Degradation h. Durability i. Constructability j. Maintainability k. Aesthetics l. Mechanical System, Ventilation Performance and Indoor Air Quality implications m. Structural implications PG. 21-51 Benchmarking 3 Section 2: Technical Investigation and Research PG. 53-111 Envelope Components and Assemblies PG. 54-102 (a) Components a. Cladding b. Air Barrier c. Insulation d. Vapor Barrier e. Structural f. Interior Assembly (b) Assemblies a. Roofs b. Walls c. Floors Fenestration PG. 103-111 (a) Methodology (b) Window Components Research a. Window Frame b. Glazing c. Integration to skin (c) Door Components Research a. Door i. Types b. Glazing Section 3: Overall Recommendation PG. 113-141 Total Configured Assemblies PG. 114-141 (a) Roofs a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic 4 (b) Walls a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii.
  • Polarforschungsagenda Status Und Perspektiven Der Deutschen

    Polarforschungsagenda Status Und Perspektiven Der Deutschen

    Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees SCAR/IASC Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees für Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) und International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Deutsches Nationalkomitee SCAR/IASC Prof. G. Heinemann (Vorsitzender) Universität Trier, Fachbereich Raum- und Umweltwissenschaften Postanschrift: Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier Telefon: +49/651/201-4630 Telefax: +49/651/201-3817 E-Mail: [email protected] www.scar-iasc.de Juli 2017 Das vorliegende Werk wurde sorgfältig erarbeitet. Dennoch übernehmen Autoren, Herausgeber und Verlag für die Richtigkeit von Angaben, Hinweisen und Ratschlägen sowie für eventuelle Druckfehler keine Haftung. Alle Rechte, insbesondere die der Übersetzung in andere Sprachen, vorbehalten. Kein Teil dieser Publikation darf ohne schrift- liche Genehmigung des Verlages in irgendeiner Form – durch Photokopie, Mikroverfilmung oder irgendein anderes Verfahren – reproduziert oder in eine von Maschinen, insbesondere von Datenverarbeitungsmaschinen, verwendbare Sprache übertra- gen oder übersetzt werden. Die Wiedergabe von Warenbezeichnungen, Handelsnamen oder sonstigen Kennzeichen in diesem Buch berechtigt nicht zu der Annahme, dass diese von jedermann frei benutzt werden dürfen. Vielmehr kann es sich auch dann um eingetragene Warenzeichen oder sonstige gesetzlich geschützte Kennzeichen handeln, wenn sie nicht eigens als solche markiert sind. All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
  • Data Structure

    Data Structure

    Data structure – Water The aim of this document is to provide a short and clear description of parameters (data items) that are to be reported in the data collection forms of the Global Monitoring Plan (GMP) data collection campaigns 2013–2014. The data itself should be reported by means of MS Excel sheets as suggested in the document UNEP/POPS/COP.6/INF/31, chapter 2.3, p. 22. Aggregated data can also be reported via on-line forms available in the GMP data warehouse (GMP DWH). Structure of the database and associated code lists are based on following documents, recommendations and expert opinions as adopted by the Stockholm Convention COP6 in 2013: · Guidance on the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants UNEP/POPS/COP.6/INF/31 (version January 2013) · Conclusions of the Meeting of the Global Coordination Group and Regional Organization Groups for the Global Monitoring Plan for POPs, held in Geneva, 10–12 October 2012 · Conclusions of the Meeting of the expert group on data handling under the global monitoring plan for persistent organic pollutants, held in Brno, Czech Republic, 13-15 June 2012 The individual reported data component is inserted as: · free text or number (e.g. Site name, Monitoring programme, Value) · a defined item selected from a particular code list (e.g., Country, Chemical – group, Sampling). All code lists (i.e., allowed values for individual parameters) are enclosed in this document, either in a particular section (e.g., Region, Method) or listed separately in the annexes below (Country, Chemical – group, Parameter) for your reference.
  • Download Preprint

    Download Preprint

    Ross and Siegert: Lake Ellsworth englacial layers and basal melting 1 1 THIS IS AN EARTHARXIV PREPRINT OF AN ARTICLE SUBMITTED FOR 2 PUBLICATION TO THE ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY 3 Basal melt over Subglacial Lake Ellsworth and it catchment: insights from englacial layering 1 2 4 Ross, N. , Siegert, M. , 1 5 School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, 6 UK 2 7 Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK Annals of Glaciology 61(81) 2019 2 8 Basal melting over Subglacial Lake Ellsworth and its 9 catchment: insights from englacial layering 1 2 10 Neil ROSS, Martin SIEGERT, 1 11 School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 2 12 Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK 13 Correspondence: Neil Ross <[email protected]> 14 ABSTRACT. Deep-water ‘stable’ subglacial lakes likely contain microbial life 15 adapted in isolation to extreme environmental conditions. How water is sup- 16 plied into a subglacial lake, and how water outflows, is important for under- 17 standing these conditions. Isochronal radio-echo layers have been used to infer 18 where melting occurs above Lake Vostok and Lake Concordia in East Antarc- 19 tica but have not been used more widely. We examine englacial layers above 20 and around Lake Ellsworth, West Antarctica, to establish where the ice sheet 21 is ‘drawn down’ towards the bed and, thus, experiences melting. Layer draw- 22 down is focused over and around the NW parts of the lake as ice, flowing 23 obliquely to the lake axis, becomes afloat.
  • Zeszyt 10. Morza I Oceany

    Zeszyt 10. Morza I Oceany

    Uwaga: Niniejsza publikacja została opracowana według stanu na 2008 rok i nie jest aktualizowana. Zamieszczony na stronie internetowej Komisji Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych poza Granica- mi Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej plik PDF jest jedynie zapisem cyfrowym wydrukowanej publikacji. Wykaz zalecanych przez Komisję polskich nazw geograficznych świata (Urzędowy wykaz polskich nazw geograficznych świata), wraz z aktualizowaną na bieżąco listą zmian w tym wykazie, zamieszczo- ny jest na stronie internetowej pod adresem: http://ksng.gugik.gov.pl/wpngs.php. KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju NAZEWNICTWO GEOGRAFICZNE ŚWIATA Zeszyt 10 Morza i oceany GŁÓWNY URZĄD GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFII Warszawa 2008 KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju Waldemar Rudnicki (przewodniczący), Andrzej Markowski (zastępca przewodniczącego), Maciej Zych (zastępca przewodniczącego), Katarzyna Przyszewska (sekretarz); członkowie: Stanisław Alexandrowicz, Andrzej Czerny, Janusz Danecki, Janusz Gołaski, Romuald Huszcza, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Artur Karp, Zbigniew Obidowski, Jerzy Ostrowski, Jarosław Pietrow, Jerzy Pietruszka, Andrzej Pisowicz, Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska, Bogusław R. Zagórski Opracowanie Kazimierz Furmańczyk Recenzent Maciej Zych Komitet Redakcyjny Andrzej Czerny, Joanna Januszek, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Jerzy Ostrowski, Waldemar Rudnicki, Maciej Zych Redaktor prowadzący Maciej
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook: Tourism

    Antarctic Treaty Handbook: Tourism

    TOURISM AND OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Introductory note Commercial tourism Until 1966 virtually all expeditions to the Antarctic had been organized by governments or had some measure of governmental backing. In that year there appeared in Antarctica for the first time a commercially organized, ship-borne tourist expedition. In subsequent years commercial tourism increased, using ships and aircraft. The area most frequently visited by sea was the Antarctic Peninsula. Regular airborne tourism began in 1977 and developed using long range passenger aircraft flying from Australia and New Zealand. Almost all of these flights overflew parts of Antarctica and returned home without landing. Airborne tourism diminished considerably following the tragic crash on Mount Erebus, Ross Island, on 28 November 1979 with the loss of 257 lives. Non-governmental non-tourist expeditions Such expeditions also began to appear in the Antarctic in 1966. The preparedness of such expeditions has varied; the consequent requests for assistance from governmental expeditions have sometimes caused disruption to scientific programs. A major aim of the consideration engendered by these expeditions within the Treaty fora has been to encourage such private expeditions to be adequately prepared and fully self-sufficient. Antarctic Treaty Recommendations XXI: Resolution 3 (1997) Standard Form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting on Tourism and Non-Governmental Activities in Antarctica The Representatives, Recalling Resolution 3 (1995) which agreed that there would be an advantage in standardized reporting of information on tourism and non-governmental activity in Antarctica; Noting that Attachment A to Recommendation 1 (1994) outlines the requirements for Advance Notice of tourism and non-governmental activities, and that Resolution 3 (1995) outlines requirements for post-activity reports; Recalling that Parties agreed at ATCM XX to trial a standard form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting during the 1996/97 Antarctic season.
  • An Investigation of Antarctic Circumpolar Current Strength in Response to Changes in Climate

    An Investigation of Antarctic Circumpolar Current Strength in Response to Changes in Climate

    An Investigation of Antarctic Circumpolar Current Strength in Response to Changes in Climate Presented by Matt Laffin Presentation Outline Introduction to Marine Sediment as a Proxy Introduction to McCave paper and inference of current strength Discuss Sediment Core site Discuss sediment depositionBIG CONCEPT and oceanography of the region Discuss sorting sedimentBring process the attention and Particle of your Size audience Analyzer over a key concept using icons or Discussion of results illustrations Marine Sediment as a Proxy ● Marine sediment cores are an excellent resource to determine information about the past. ● As climatic changes occur so do changes in sediment transportation and deposition. ○ Sedimentation rates ○ Temperature ○ Biology How can we determine past ocean current strength using marine sediment? McCave et al, 1995 ● “Sortable silt” flow speed proxy ● Size distributions of sediment from the Nova Scotian Rise measured by Coulter Counter (a) Dominant 4 μm and weak 10 μm mode under slow currents (b) Silt signature after moderate currents of 5–10 cm s−1 (c) Pronounced mode in the part of the silt spectrum >10 μm after strong currents (10–15 cm s−1) McCave et al, 1995/2006 Complications to determine current strength ● Particles < 10 μm are subject to electrostatic forces which bind them ● The mean of 10–63 μm sortable silt denoted as is a more sensitive indicator of flow speed. McCave et al, 1995/2006 IODP Leg 178, Site 1096 A and B Depositional Environment Depositional Environment ● Sediment is eroded and transported
  • Fishes of the Eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica

    Fishes of the Eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica

    Polar Biol (2004) 27: 637–650 DOI 10.1007/s00300-004-0632-2 REVIEW Joseph Donnelly Æ Joseph J. Torres Tracey T. Sutton Æ Christina Simoniello Fishes of the eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica Received: 26 November 2003 / Revised: 16 April 2004 / Accepted: 20 April 2004 / Published online: 16 June 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract Antarctic fishes were sampled with 41 midwater in Antarctica is dominated by a few fish families and 6 benthic trawls during the 1999–2000 austral (Bathylagidae, Gonostomatidae, Myctophidae and summer in the eastern Ross Sea. The oceanic pelagic Paralepididae) with faunal diversity decreasing south assemblage (0–1,000 m) contained Electrona antarctica, from the Antarctic Polar Front to the continent (Ever- Gymnoscopelus opisthopterus, Bathylagus antarcticus, son 1984; Kock 1992; Kellermann 1996). South of the Cyclothone kobayashii and Notolepis coatsi. These were Polar Front, the majority of meso- and bathypelagic replaced over the shelf by notothenioids, primarily Ple- fishes have circum-Antarctic distributions (McGinnis uragramma antarcticum. Pelagic biomass was low and 1982; Gon and Heemstra 1990). Taken collectively, the concentrated below 500 m. The demersal assemblage fishes are significant contributors to the pelagic biomass was characteristic of East Antarctica and included seven and are important trophic elements, both as predators species each of Artedidraconidae, Bathydraconidae and and prey (Rowedder 1979; Hopkins and Torres 1989; Channichthyidae, ten species of Nototheniidae, and Lancraft et al. 1989, 1991; Duhamel 1998). Over the three species each of Rajidae and Zoarcidae. Common continental slope and shelf, notothenioids dominate the species were Trematomus eulepidotus (36.5%), T. scotti ichthyofauna (DeWitt 1970). Most members of this (32.0%), Prionodraco evansii (4.9%), T.
  • A New Bed Elevation Model for the Weddell Sea Sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet

    A New Bed Elevation Model for the Weddell Sea Sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet

    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 711–725, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-711-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A new bed elevation model for the Weddell Sea sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Hafeez Jeofry1,2, Neil Ross3, Hugh F. J. Corr4, Jilu Li5, Mathieu Morlighem6, Prasad Gogineni7, and Martin J. Siegert1 1Grantham Institute and Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK 2School of Marine Science and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia 3School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Claremont Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK 4British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK 5Center for the Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA 6Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA 7Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA Correspondence: Hafeez Jeofry ([email protected]) and Martin J. Siegert ([email protected]) Received: 11 August 2017 – Discussion started: 26 October 2017 Revised: 26 October 2017 – Accepted: 5 February 2018 – Published: 9 April 2018 Abstract. We present a new digital elevation model (DEM) of the bed, with a 1 km gridding, of the Weddell Sea (WS) sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS). The DEM has a total area of ∼ 125 000 km2 covering the Institute, Möller and Foundation ice streams, as well as the Bungenstock ice rise. In comparison with the Bedmap2 product, our DEM includes new aerogeophysical datasets acquired by the Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS) through the NASA Operation IceBridge (OIB) program in 2012, 2014 and 2016.
  • Ice-Flow Structure and Ice Dynamic Changes in the Weddell Sea Sector

    Ice-Flow Structure and Ice Dynamic Changes in the Weddell Sea Sector

    Bingham RG, Rippin DM, Karlsson NB, Corr HFJ, Ferraccioli F, Jordan TA, Le Brocq AM, Rose KC, Ross N, Siegert MJ. Ice-flow structure and ice-dynamic changes in the Weddell Sea sector of West Antarctica from radar-imaged internal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 2015, 120(4), 655-670. Copyright: ©2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI link to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003291 Date deposited: 04/06/2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface RESEARCH ARTICLE Ice-flow structure and ice dynamic changes 10.1002/2014JF003291 in the Weddell Sea sector of West Antarctica Key Points: from radar-imaged internal layering • RES-sounded internal layers in Institute/Möller Ice Streams show Robert G. Bingham1, David M. Rippin2, Nanna B. Karlsson3, Hugh F. J. Corr4, Fausto Ferraccioli4, fl ow changes 4 5 6 7 8 • Ice-flow reconfiguration evinced in Tom A. Jordan , Anne M. Le Brocq , Kathryn C. Rose , Neil Ross , and Martin J. Siegert Bungenstock Ice Rise to higher 1 2 tributaries School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, Environment Department, University of York, York, UK, • Holocene dynamic reconfiguration 3Centre for Ice and Climate, Niels Bohr Institute, University