DOCSLIB.ORG

Brain Organization in Collembola (Springtails)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brain Organization in Collembola (Springtails) Brain organization in Collembola (springtails) Martin Kollmann, Wolf Huetteroth 1, Joachim Schachtner* Department of Biology e Animal Physiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany article info abstract Article history: Arthropoda is comprised of four major taxa: Hexapoda, Crustacea, Myriapoda and Chelicerata. Although Received 13 September 2010 this classification is widely accepted, there is still some debate about the internal relationships of these Received in revised form groups. In particular, the phylogenetic position of Collembola remains enigmatic. Some molecular studies 5 January 2011 place Collembola into a close relationship to Protura and Diplura within the monophyletic Hexapoda, but Accepted 17 February 2011 this placement is not universally accepted, as Collembola is also regarded as either the sister group to Branchiopoda (a crustacean taxon) or to Pancrustacea (crustaceans þ hexapods). To contribute to the Keywords: current debate on the phylogenetic position of Collembola, we examined the brains in three collembolan Neuropil fi Evolution species: Folsomia candida, Protaphorura armata and Tetrodontophora bielanensis, using antennal back lls, Central body series of semi-thin sections, and immunostaining technique with several antisera, in conjunction with Mushroom body confocal laser scanning microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions. We identified several Antennal lobe neuroanatomical structures in the collembolan brain, including a fan-shaped central body showing a columnar organization, a protocerebral bridge, one pair of antennal lobes with 20e30 spheroidal glomeruli each, and a structure, which we interpret as a simply organized mushroom body. The results of our neuroanatomical study are consistent with the phylogenetic position of Collembola within the Hexapoda and do not contradict the hypothesis of a close relationship of Collembola, Protura and Diplura. Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction (Hexapoda þ Crustacea), also termed the Tetraconata due to the unique composition of the compound eyes with four ommatidial The ground pattern of brain architecture and neurochemistry of cone cells (Friedrich and Tautz, 1995; Zrzavý and Stys, 1997; Dohle, the neopteran insects has been described in a variety of species and 2001; Richter, 2002; Mallatt et al., 2004). According to the Pan- seems to be highly conserved, but considerable morphological and crustacea/Tetraconata concept, Hexapoda is regarded as either the functional modifications are readily observed (e.g., Pflugfelder, sister group or an in-group of Crustacea. 1937; Strausfeld, 1976, 2005; Homberg, 1994; Burrows, 1996; Analysis of 18S rRNA sequence dataplaced Collembola as a sister Nässel, 2002; Schachtner et al., 2005; Homberg, 2008; Strausfeld group to a monophyletic clade comprising the crustacean taxa et al., 2009; Nässel and Winther, 2010). In contrast, comparable Branchiopoda, Anostraca and Notostraca, while Archaeognatha data from the remaining hexapod groups, such as the Palaeoptera sister groups with Pterygota (Spears and Abele, 1998). Other studies (Odonata and Ephemeroptera), the apterygote insects (Zygentoma based on mitochondrial gene sequences (Nardi et al., 2001, 2003) and Archeognatha) and the Entognatha (Diplura, Protura and Col- instead support a position of Collembola as the sister group to lembola), are rare or even missing. Pancrustacea. However, more recent analyses of the 28S rRNA and Traditional phylogenies based on morphological data consid- 18S rRNA genes and numerous nuclear protein-coding genes ered Hexapoda as the sister group to Myriapoda, forming the clade suggest the monophyly of a clade comprising Collembola, Diplura Tracheata (also termed Atelocerata or Monoantennata (discussed in and Protura, which is the sister group to the remaining hexapods Osorio et al., 1995; Dohle, 1997a,b; Wheeler, 1997; Mallatt et al., (Mallatt and Giribet, 2006; Misof et al., 2007; Regier et al., 2010), 2004)). However, recent studies favor the clade Pancrustacea thus supporting the traditional placement of Collembola close to the base of the hexapod tree (Bitsch and Bitsch, 2000). In summary, there is still no consensus about the definitive position of Collembola within the arthropods and additional data * Corresponding author. are required. In particular, an analysis of neuroanatomy in repre- E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Schachtner). 1 Present address: Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts sentatives of Collembola seems promising as it might help clarify Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. the phylogenetic position of this group. Furthermore, such an 305 analysis would provide important insights into the evolution of the 2. Materials and methods hexapod brain. So far, only a few studies have dealt with the collembolan brain 2.1. Animals architecture (e.g., Kühnle, 1913; Hanström, 1940; Tysziewicz, 1981; Korr, 1968), but some additional information is available from Three different collembolan species were used: (1) F. candida studies dealing with the collembolan endocrine system (e.g., (Willem, 1902), obtained from b.t.b.e. Insektenzucht GmbH Cassagnau and Juberthie, 1966, 1967a,b; Cassagnau et al., 1968; (Schnürpflingen, Germany), (2) P. armata (Tullberg, 1869), kindly Lauga-Reyrel, 1984a,b). These classical studies provide an impor- provided by Dr. Mark Maraun (TU Darmstadt, Germany), and (3) T. tant source of information about the basic composition of the bielanensis (Waga, 1842), kindly provided by Dr. David Russell collembolan brain. However, the techniques used allowed only (Public Museum of Natural History, Görlitz, Germany). Specimens limited insights into its neuropilar organization. Currently, only one of F. candida and P. armata were bred in small plastic boxes in detailed study of at least one major neuropil in the collembolan darkness by room temperature and supplied with yeast as food brain, the central body, is available (Strausfeld et al., 2006). source. Specimens of T. bielanensis were caught in the area near To contribute to a better knowledge of the collembolan brain, Görlitz, Germany. we applied different neuroanatomical techniques, including immunohistochemistry in conjunction with confocal laser scanning 2.2. Primary antisera microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions, and analyzed the brains in three distantly related collembolan species. The Details on all used primary antisera, including their dilution, transparent cuticle of the two smaller species (Folsomia candida and animal source and corresponding references, are listed in Table 1. Protaphorura armata, with a body length of 1.5e3 mm) allowed for All used neuropeptide antisera were raised against neuropeptide in situ scanning of the brain through the intact head capsule sequences, which are highly conserved among insects (for reviews, whereas the third species (Tetrodontophora bielanensis or “giant” see Nässel, 2002; Homberg, 2002; Nässel and Homberg, 2006). springtail, with a body length of 5e10 mm) was large enough to The monoclonal primary antibody from mouse against a fusion dissect out the brains for our analyses. protein consisting of a glutathione-S-transferase and the first In the current study, we use wholemount immunostainings of amino acids of the presynaptic vesicle protein synapsin I coded by Collembola brains using antibodies against synapsin to resolve the its 50-end (SYNORF1; 3C11, #151101) was used to selectively label entire neuropilar brain anatomy in combination with antibodies neuropilar areas. It was used in combination with one additional against several neuromediators (including the biogenic amine primary antibody raised in rabbit. The synapsin antibody was serotonin and several neuropeptides: allatotropin, allatostatin-A, kindly provided by Dr. Erich Buchner (University of Würzburg, orcokinin, tachykinin, myoinhibitory peptide, periviscerokinin, and Germany) and was first described by Klagges et al. (1996). The FMRFamides) which have in several insect species been shown to antibody was used at a dilution of 1:50. The polyclonal antiserum depict several distinct neuropils (for reviews see Nässel, 2002; against serotonin (5HT) was raised in rabbit (DiaSorin, Kansas City, Homberg, 2002; Nässel and Homberg, 2006). An a-tubulin anti- MO, USA). Its specificity for the insect nervous system was shown in body was used to identify fiber tracts and commissures several studies (e.g., Dacks et al., 2006). The antiserum against (Kononenko and Pflüger, 2007), and an antibody against the cata- Manduca sexta allatotropin (Mas-AT, pGFKNVEMMTARGFamide) lytic subunit of protein kinase A (DC0) to visualize the mushroom was raised in rabbit. It was kindly provided by Dr. J. Veenstra bodies (MB) (Farris and Strausfeld, 2003). To resolve the projection (University of Bordeaux, Talence, France) and first described by areas of the sensory and chemosensory neurons of the antennae, Veenstra and Hagedorn (1993). The antiserum against Diploptera we performed antennal backfills for F. candida and P. armata.To punctata allatostatin 7 (Dip-AST 7, APSGAQRLYGFGLamide) was further analyze brain structures we produced methylene blue- raised in rabbit. It was kindly provided by Dr. H. Agricola (University stained semi-thin sections of whole F. candida heads. of Jena, Germany) and was first described by Vitzthum et al. (1996). Our findings revealed more similarities in brain composition The antiserum against Asn13-orcokinin (Asn13-OK, between collembolans and hexapods as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing of the Guard in White Grub Control Insecticides
    A PRACTICAL RESEARCH DIGEST FOR TURF MANAGERS Volume 10, Issue 6 • June 2001 ¡TURFGRASS PEST CONTROL IN THIS ISSUE • The changing of the The Changing of the guard in white grub Guard in White Grub control insecticides 1 Organophosphate/ Control Insecticides carbamate update New product information By Kevin Mathias Natural control influence of insecticides combination of federal regulatory rulings and economic decisions by insecticide Multiple targeting manufacturers has dramatically changed the landscape of white grub insecticides A and control strategies. At the beginning of the 1990's white grub control insecti- • Site analysis for golf cides consisted mainly of organophosphate and carbamate based chemistries with only a course development 7 few biorational products available (Table 1). As a group, the organophosphate and car- Climate bamate insecticides, have a relatively short residual activity and are highly efficacious when used in curative control programs. Topography Optimum results are attained if the products are applied in mid to late August or into September, as white grub damage is first noticed and Drainage patterns when the grubs are young and relatively small. Optimum results are Water availability As we enter the new millennium many of the cura- attained if the tive control products have been replaced by a group of Soils and geology products are applied new insecticides. These insecticides, Merit and Mach 2, offer greater applicator safety, have less adverse effect Environmental issues in mid to late August on the environment, provide a longer window of appli- Wetlands or into September, as cation due to their extended soil residual activities, have minimal impact on beneficial predators, and pro- Water quality white grub damage vide excellent control (+90%) of white grubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Springtails in Sugarbeet: Identification, Biology, And
    E-1205 SpringtailsSpringtails in Sugarbeet: Figure 1. Adult springtail (40x magnification). Identification, Biology, and Management Mark A. Boetel, Research and Extension Entomologist Robert J. Dregseth, Research Specialist Introduction Mohamed F. R. Khan, Extension Sugarbeet Specialist Springtails are tiny, wingless, primitive animals commonly placed into the insect order Collembola. They are so unusual that some experts classify them as non-insects. Springtails Description are one of the most abundant and diverse animal groups on Springtails can vary in color from white to yellow, earth with over 6,000 described species and an estimated orange, metallic green, lavender, gray, or red. A tiny tube eight times as many remaining to be identified. on the abdomen, the collophore, is common to all spring- The springtails have worldwide distribution and tails. The collophore is mostly needed for maintaining occupy a diverse habitat range that includes soil, algae, old optimal water balance but also functions in some species as snowbanks, beaches, caves, cisterns, vacant bird nests, a sticky appendage for adhering to surfaces. The name tropical rain forest canopies, tidal pools, deserts, the “springtail” refers to an unusual forked organ, the furcula, surfaces of freshwater ponds and streams, and even the that arises near the posterior end of some species. It enables frozen terrain of Antarctica. However, they are most them to jump when disturbed. The furcula is usually folded abundant in warm, moist environments. Economically forward along the underside of the body and held in place important species in North Dakota and Minnesota with a clasp called the tenaculum. To jump, the springtail sugarbeet fields are the soil-inhabiting springtails.
    [Show full text]
  • Lozano-Fernandez Et Al
    Citation for published version: Lozano-Fernandez, J, Giacomelli, M, Fleming, JF, Chen, A, Vinther, J, Thomsen, PF, Glenner, H, Palero, F, Legg, DA, Iliffe, TM, Pisani, D & Olesen, J 2019, 'Pancrustacean Evolution Illuminated by Taxon-Rich Genomic- Scale Data Sets with an Expanded Remipede Sampling', Genome biology and evolution, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2055-2070. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz097 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evz097 Publication date: 2019 Link to publication University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 GBE Pancrustacean Evolution Illuminated by Taxon-Rich Genomic- Scale Data Sets with an Expanded Remipede Sampling 1,2,9,* 1 2,10 2,11 1,2 Jesus Lozano-Fernandez , Mattia Giacomelli , James F. Fleming ,AlbertChen , Jakob Vinther , Philip Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article-abstract/11/8/2055/5528088 by University of Cambridge user on 30 September 2019 Francis Thomsen3,12, Henrik Glenner4, Ferran Palero5,6,DavidA.Legg7,ThomasM.Iliffe8, Davide
    [Show full text]
  • Going Deeper Into High and Low Phylogenetic Relationships of Protura
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Going Deeper into High and Low Phylogenetic Relationships of Protura 1, , 2,3, 3 1 1 Antonio Carapelli * y , Yun Bu y, Wan-Jun Chen , Francesco Nardi , Chiara Leo , Francesco Frati 1 and Yun-Xia Luan 3,4,* 1 Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Via A. Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy; [email protected] (F.N.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (F.F.) 2 Natural History Research Center, Shanghai Natural History Museum, Shanghai Science & Technology Museum, Shanghai 200041, China; [email protected] 3 Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China; [email protected] 4 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental Biology and Applied Technology, Institute of Insect Science and Technology, School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (Y.-X.L.); Tel.: +39-0577-234410 (A.C.); +86-18918100826 (Y.-X.L.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 March 2019; Accepted: 5 April 2019; Published: 10 April 2019 Abstract: Proturans are small, wingless, soil-dwelling arthropods, generally associated with the early diversification of Hexapoda. Their bizarre morphology, together with conflicting results of molecular studies, has nevertheless made their classification ambiguous. Furthermore, their limited dispersal capability (due to the primarily absence of wings) and their euedaphic lifestyle have greatly complicated species-level identification.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Index of Common Names
    Index of Common Names BITING/STINGING/VENOMOUS PESTS Bees ………………………………………………………… 6 Honey bee…………………………………………………6 Africanized bees……………………………………….. 7 Bumblebee…………………………………………………….9 Carpenter bee……………………………………………….9 Digger bee………………………………………………………11 Leaf cutter bee………………………………………………….12 Sweat bee………………………………………………………..13 Wasps…………………………………………………………….14 Tarantula hawk…………………………………………………14 Yellowjacket……………………………………………………….15 Aerial yellowjacket ……………………………………………….15,16 Common yellowjacket ……………………………………………….15 German yellowjacket……………………………………………….15 Western yellowjacket……………………………………………….15 Paper wasp………………………………………………. 18 Brown paper wasp……………………………………………….18 Common paper wasp ……………………………………………….18 European paper wasp……………………………………………….18 Navajo paper wasp……………………………………………….18,19 Yellow paper wasp……………………………………………….18,19 Western paper wasp……………………………………………….18 Mud dauber………………………………………………. 20 Black and blue mud dauber……………………………..………………….20 Black and yellow mud dauber……………………………………………….20 Organ pipe mud dauber……………………………………………….20,21 Velvet ant……………………………………………………21 Scorpions………………………………………………………23 Arizona bark scorpion……………………………………………….23 Giant hairy scorpion ……………………………………………….24 Striped-tail scorpion……………………………………………….25 Yellow ground scorpion……………………………………………….25 Spiders…………………………………………………………..26 Cellar spider……………………………………………….2 6 Recluse spider……………………………………………….27 Tarantula…………………………………………………. 28 Widow spider……………………………………………….29 Scorpion/spider look-alikes……………………………………………….30 Pseudoscorpion……………………………………………….30 Solifugid/wind
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Resolution of Sea Spider Diversification Through Integration Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.31.929612; this version posted February 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Phylogenomic resolution of sea spider diversification through integration of multiple data classes 1Jesús A. Ballesteros†, 1Emily V.W. Setton†, 1Carlos E. Santibáñez López†, 2Claudia P. Arango, 3Georg Brenneis, 4Saskia Brix, 5Esperanza Cano-Sánchez, 6Merai Dandouch, 6Geoffrey F. Dilly, 7Marc P. Eleaume, 1Guilherme Gainett, 8Cyril Gallut, 6Sean McAtee, 6Lauren McIntyre, 9Amy L. Moran, 6Randy Moran, 5Pablo J. López-González, 10Gerhard Scholtz, 6Clay Williamson, 11H. Arthur Woods, 12Ward C. Wheeler, 1Prashant P. Sharma* 1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA 2 Queensland Museum, Biodiversity Program, Brisbane, Australia 3 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Cytologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 4 Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), c/o Biocenter Grindel (CeNak), Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, Hamburg, Germany 5 Biodiversidad y Ecología Acuática, Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain 6 Department of Biology, California State University-Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA, USA 7 Départment Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France 8 Institut de Systématique, Emvolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Concarneau, France 9 Department of Biology, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA Page 1 of 31 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.31.929612; this version posted February 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Ellipura Monophyletic? a Combined Analysis of Basal Hexapod
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4 (2004) 319–340 www.elsevier.de/ode Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects Gonzalo Giribeta,Ã, Gregory D.Edgecombe b, James M.Carpenter c, Cyrille A.D’Haese d, Ward C.Wheeler c aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bAustralian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia cDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA dFRE 2695 CNRS, De´partement Syste´matique et Evolution, Muse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, 45 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France Received 27 February 2004; accepted 18 May 2004 Abstract Hexapoda includes 33 commonly recognized orders, most of them insects.Ongoing controversy concerns the grouping of Protura and Collembola as a taxon Ellipura, the monophyly of Diplura, a single or multiple origins of entognathy, and the monophyly or paraphyly of the silverfish (Lepidotrichidae and Zygentoma s.s.) with respect to other dicondylous insects.Here we analyze relationships among basal hexapod orders via a cladistic analysis of sequence data for five molecular markers and 189 morphological characters in a simultaneous analysis framework using myriapod and crustacean outgroups.Using a sensitivity analysis approach and testing for stability, the most congruent parameters resolve Tricholepidion as sister group to the remaining Dicondylia, whereas most suboptimal parameter sets group Tricholepidion with Zygentoma.Stable hypotheses include the monophyly of Diplura, and a sister group relationship between Diplura and Protura, contradicting the Ellipura hypothesis.Hexapod monophyly is contradicted by an alliance between Collembola, Crustacea and Ectognatha (i.e., exclusive of Diplura and Protura) in molecular and combined analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Diplura (Hexapoda: Entognatha) of California
    Zootaxa 3780 (2): 297–322 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3780.2.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DEF59FEA-C1C1-4AC6-9BB0-66E2DE694DFA Annotated Checklist of the Diplura (Hexapoda: Entognatha) of California G.O. GRAENING1, YANA SHCHERBANYUK2 & MARYAM ARGHANDIWAL3 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Sacramento 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6077. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The first checklist of California dipluran taxa is presented with annotations. New state and county records are reported, as well as new taxa in the process of being described. California has a remarkable dipluran fauna with about 8% of global richness. California hosts 63 species in 5 families, with 51 of those species endemic to the State, and half of these endemics limited to single locales. The genera Nanojapyx, Hecajapyx, and Holjapyx are all primarily restricted to California. Two species are understood to be exotic, and six dubious taxa are removed from the State checklist. Counties in the central Coastal Ranges have the highest diversity of diplurans; this may indicate sampling bias. Caves and mines harbor unique and endemic dipluran species, and subterranean habitats should be better inventoried. Only four California taxa exhibit obvious troglomorphy and may be true cave obligates. In general, the North American dipluran fauna is still under-inven- toried. Since many taxa are morphologically uniform but genetically diverse, genetic analyses should be incorporated into future taxonomic descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesofauna at the Soil-Scree Interface in a Deep Karst Environment
    diversity Article Mesofauna at the Soil-Scree Interface in a Deep Karst Environment Nikola Jureková 1,* , Natália Raschmanová 1 , Dana Miklisová 2 and L’ubomír Kováˇc 1 1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Šrobárova 2, SK-04180 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] (N.R.); [email protected] (L’.K.) 2 Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The community patterns of Collembola (Hexapoda) were studied at two sites along a microclimatically inversed scree slope in a deep karst valley in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia, in warm and cold periods of the year, respectively. Significantly lower average temperatures in the scree profile were noted at the gorge bottom in both periods, meaning that the site in the lower part of the scree, near the bank of creek, was considerably colder and wetter compared to the warmer and drier site at upper part of the scree slope. Relatively high diversity of Collembola was observed at two fieldwork scree sites, where cold-adapted species, considered climatic relicts, showed considerable abundance. The gorge bottom, with a cold and wet microclimate and high carbon content even in the deeper MSS horizons, provided suitable environmental conditions for numerous psychrophilic and subterranean species. Ecological groups such as trogloxenes and subtroglophiles showed decreasing trends of abundance with depth, in contrast to eutroglophiles and a troglobiont showing an opposite distributional pattern at scree sites in both periods. Our study documented that in terms of soil and Citation: Jureková, N.; subterranean mesofauna, colluvial screes of deep karst gorges represent (1) a transition zone between Raschmanová, N.; Miklisová, D.; the surface and the deep subterranean environment, and (2) important climate change refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Serotonin-Immunoreactive Neurons in the Ventral Nerve Cord of Remipedia (Crustacea): Support for a Sister Group Relationship of Remipedia and Hexapoda? Stemme Et Al
    Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the ventral nerve cord of Remipedia (Crustacea): support for a sister group relationship of Remipedia and Hexapoda? Stemme et al. Stemme et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:119 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/119 Stemme et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:119 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/119 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Serotonin-immunoreactive neurons in the ventral nerve cord of Remipedia (Crustacea): support for a sister group relationship of Remipedia and Hexapoda? Torben Stemme1, Thomas M Iliffe2, Björn M von Reumont3, Stefan Koenemann4, Steffen Harzsch5 and Gerd Bicker1* Abstract Background: Remipedia were initially seen as a primitive taxon within Pancrustacea based on characters considered ancestral, such as the homonomously segmented trunk. Meanwhile, several morphological and molecular studies proposed a more derived position of Remipedia within Pancrustacea, including a sister group relationship to Hexapoda. Because of these conflicting hypotheses, fresh data are crucial to contribute new insights into euarthropod phylogeny. The architecture of individually identifiable serotonin-immunoreactive neurons has successfully been used for phylogenetic considerations in Euarthropoda. Here, we identified neurons in three species of Remipedia with an antiserum against serotonin and compared our findings to reconstructed ground patterns in other euarthropod taxa. Additionally, we traced neurite connectivity and neuropil outlines using antisera against acetylated α-tubulin and synapsin. Results: The ventral nerve cord of Remipedia displays a typical rope-ladder-like arrangement of separate metameric ganglia linked by paired longitudinally projecting connectives. The peripheral projections comprise an intersegmental nerve, consisting of two branches that fuse shortly after exiting the connectives, and the segmental anterior and posterior nerve.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • A Silurian Soft-Bodied Biota Author(S): Donald G
    A Silurian Soft-Bodied Biota Author(s): Donald G. Mikulic, Derek E. G. Briggs, Joanne Kluessendorf Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 228, No. 4700 (May 10, 1985), pp. 715-717 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1694543 Accessed: 24/02/2010 21:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aaas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org cept where infilled by diagenetic fluor- apatite.
    [Show full text]