DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Global Report on Improving Transport Connectivity for Lldcs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Global Report on Improving Transport Connectivity for Lldcs Draft Global Report on Improving Transport Connectivity for LLDCs and Building of Resilient Transport Infrastructure to Support Accelerated Progress Towards the SDGs This study was commissioned by the United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States (UN-OHRLLS). UN-OHRLLS gratefully acknowledges Ms. Fadiah Achmadi for preparing the report. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. The funding for the preparation of this study was made possible through the project led by UN-OHRLLS entitled: Strengthening the capacity of Landlocked Developing Countries under the “Belt and Road Initiative” to design and implement policies that promote transport connectivity for the achievement of the SDGs which is funded by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Sub-Fund - United Nations Peace and Development Trust Fund. Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................................................ v List of Boxes .................................................................................................................................................................................. vi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Landlocked Developing Countries ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Transport Connectivity ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3. Global Frameworks for Sustainable Development in LLDCs ................................................................... 8 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals .................................................................................................. 8 Vienna Programme of Action ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4. Organization of the Report ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Status of Transport Infrastructure Development ................................................................................................ 9 2.1. SDGs as Drivers for Improving Connectivity ................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Road Transport Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3. Rail Transport ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.4. Air Transport .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.5. Inland Water Transport ........................................................................................................................................ 24 2.6. Dry Ports ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.7. Sea ports ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 2.8. Transport Corridor Infrastructure Development ...................................................................................... 28 3. Status of Development of Complementary Infrastructure to Transport Connectivity ..................... 33 3.1. Energy Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................. 33 3.2. ICT Connectivity ........................................................................................................................................................ 36 4. Development of Climate-Resilient Infrastructure ............................................................................................ 40 4.1. Climate Change .......................................................................................................................................................... 40 4.2. Sustainable Solutions ............................................................................................................................................. 43 4.3. Adaptation Policy Framework ............................................................................................................................ 45 5. Investment and Maintenance Funding for Transport Infrastructure ...................................................... 47 5.1. Keeping up with demand ...................................................................................................................................... 47 5.2. Traditional Funding Sources ............................................................................................................................... 48 5.2.1. Domestic resource mobilization - Public Finance ............................................................................ 48 5.2.2. Official Development Assistance .............................................................................................................. 55 5.2.3. Private Sector Financing and Foreign Direct Investment ............................................................. 56 5.2.4. Funding by Commercial Banks ................................................................................................................. 57 5.2.5. Public-Private Partnerships ....................................................................................................................... 58 5.3. Innovative Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................ 60 5.3.1. Pension Funds and Insurance Reserves ............................................................................................... 60 5.3.2. Specific initiatives .......................................................................................................................................... 61 5.3.3. South-South and Triangular Cooperation ............................................................................................ 63 5.3.4. Financing climate-resilient infrastructure (Climate Finance) .................................................... 65 6. Improving Soft Infrastructure for Transport Connectivity .......................................................................... 68 6.1. Trade Facilitation ..................................................................................................................................................... 68 6.1.1. Border crossing efficiency .......................................................................................................................... 69 6.1.2. Border Crossing Operation Improvement ........................................................................................... 72 6.2. Legal Framework ..................................................................................................................................................... 76 6.2.1. International agreements and conventions ........................................................................................ 76 6.2.2. Regional and sub-regional agreements ................................................................................................ 85 7. Preparedness of LLDCs to Handle the Impact of Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations ..... 88 7.1. COVID-19 impacts on transport system ......................................................................................................... 89 7.2. Measures to facilitate cross border activities during pandemic .......................................................... 90 7.3. Important role of digitalization .......................................................................................................................... 92 8. Policy Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 94 i 8.1. Improving capacity on closing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Godovoy Otchet Ktzh Angl.Pdf
    www.railways.kz Annual Report Address of the CONTENTS Chairman of the Board of Directors } 02 Information on JSC «NC «Kazakhstan Temir Zholy» } 04 Operating results 0208 for 2015 } Assets profile of the Company } 22 Objects and Plans for Future Periods } 30 Risks Management } 34 Corporate Governance } 38 Sustainable 02 Development } 56 Financial Statement } 66 Address of the Chairman www.railways.kz Dear readers of the annual report, colleagues, partners! In 2015 negative global economic trends, political tensions, and sanctions policy against countries that are trade partners of Kazakhstan continued to exert its influence on the main basic positions of Kazakhstan’s exports and the overall performance in the country’s economy. In the reporting period, the pace of the national economy development fell to 1.2%, in 2014 this figure was 4.3%. In January-December 2015 the foreign trade turnover of Kazakhstan amounted to 76 billion US dollars and decreased by 37.1% compared to 2014, including exports - by 42.5%. Trade turnover with Russia and Belarus, which accounts for over 50% of the volume of rail transportation decreased by 27.8% and 37.8%, respectively. Generally this had a negative impact on operation of the transport and logistics sector of the country, especially in a traditional for JSC «NC «KTZ» segment of export shipments of general cargo mass. So, due to decrease of world prices and of demand for iron ore on the world market, mainly in the Chinese market, a shipper of such cargo - Sokolov-Sarbaiskoye mining and processing production association - during 2015 exported to China the iron ore in the amount of 190 thousand tons against 2.8 million tons in 2014 and comparing with the level of 2013, this figure had decreased by 30 times.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Common and Sustainable Transportation in Libya
    International Conference on Technical Sciences (ICST2019) 04 – 06 March 2019 Future of Common and Sustainable Transportation in Libya Aiman NOUH Electrical & Electronic Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering / Omar Al-Mukhtar University Al-Bayda, Libya [email protected] Abstract—The Transport sector in Libya heavily transport. Its sustainability is evident from its low levels depends on conventional vehicles, those that work with of atmospheric emissions compared to automotive, internal combustion engine. These vehicles burn the fuel maritime and air transport. It employs an electric traction and then inject a significant amount of pollutants into the with low energy consumption. It guarantees a air which negatively affect its quality. In an effort to comfortably and quickly moving large volumes of people promote public awareness, this paper firstly reviews and goods over short and long distances. Urban rail alternative fuel vehicles as a logic step towards sustainable, consumes of 0.12 kWh average per passenger-km, and efficient and environment friendly transportation. They realizes a factor of seven times more energy efficient than minimize fossil fuel dependency and reduce CO2 emissions a vehicle travel in cities [5]. We can say that the rail is that are responsible for the global warming. These already considered as the greenest form of mass transport. alternatives are the common transportation (railroads and bus networks) and the unconventional vehicles (battery High fuel economy and environmental friendly electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell vehicle (FCV) and hybrid solutions, in the last decade, have seen a large growing electric vehicle (HEV)). Secondly, an implementation of leading to various configuration of vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • I Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport
    i Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting Pricing and Infrastructural Innovations using Frugal Approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria iii Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting pricing and infrastructural innovations using frugal approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria Innovatie en aanpassing in stedelijk light-rail vervoer Aanpassing van beprijzing- en infrastructuurinnovaties met behulp van een sobere aanpak in Ethiopië en Nigeria Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the rector magnificus Prof. dr. R.C.M.E. Engels and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board. The public defence shall be held on Friday May 8, 2020 at 11.30 hrs by Taslim Adebowale Alade born in Kano, Nigeria Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport iv Doctoral Committee: Promoter: Prof. dr. J. Edelenbos Other members: Prof. dr. H. Geerlings Prof. dr. ir. T. Tillema Prof. dr. P. Knorringa Copromoter: Dr. A. Gianoli v Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Dedication I dedicate this PhD dissertation to my late father and mother, Abdulrahman Babatunde Alade and Esther Eyinade Alade; for giving me a solid and deeply rooted foundation in education. Our parent made sure we had all we needed, especially when it comes to our education. They also encouraged us to push the limits and always aim high, no matter the challenges on the way. I love you both. Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport vi Acknowledgments First, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Jesus Christ, our Lord and saviour, for His love, sponsorship of the PhD studies, grace, empowerment, protection, provision, and mercy upon my life and family.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Solutionsin Building CPEC-A Flagship Of
    Issue , Working paper CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE Challenges and CHINA-PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDORSolutionsIn Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Written by: Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator CoE CPEC Minitry of Planning, Pakistan Institute Development Reform of Development Economics Challenges and Solutions in Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator Centre of Excellence (CoE) for China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Islamabad, Pakistan, [email protected] Abstract-One of the OBOR pilot corridors out of the six corridors is CPEC. The CPEC has been initiated in 2013 and due to its speedy progress, CPEC is now vastly considered as the “flagship” project among the OBOR projects. The CPEC initiatives include; development of Gwadar Port, road, rail and optical fiber connectivity, energy corridor and Special Economic Zones development for bilateral benefits to attain inclusive growth and regional harmonization. Before the inception of CPEC, the growth of Pakistan was curtailed by two major bottlenecks; acute energy shortages and weak local and regional connectivity infrastructures. In 2013, CPEC came with 59 billion USDs under OBOR and it has been eliminating all major economic bottlenecks. This paper sheds light on the BRI with deep focusing on CPEC. It further represents the Pakistan’s improving economic indicators through CPEC. This paper will also examine some key challenges and their solutions in building CPEC. Key Words-BRI, Challenges, Connectivity, Corridors, CPEC, Global Competitive Index (GCI), Investment, Infrastructure, OBOR I. INTRODUCTION The Globalization has brought vast changes in global economy and has directed the evolution to a boundary less development. This phenomenon has significantly amplified the maritime trade from 2.37 billion tons of freight to 5.88 billion tons of freight moving through maritime routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways of the MENA Region, Tools of National and Foreign Policy
    DHEEI – Mediterranean Studies Railways of the MENA Region, tools of national and foreign policy Master’s Thesis submitted by GALLOY Théophile Academic year: 2018-2019 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Silvia Colombo Acknowledgements I wish to express my appreciation to my family, my co-students and CIFE for their valuable support throughout this year. I am also very grateful for the advice given by my fantastic supervisor Dr. Silvia Colombo, who has kindly dedicated some time to read, correct and advise me on my work, whilst allowing me to remain creative in my approach and research. I would also like to extend my thanks to my previous manager, Mr. Stephane Downes, and my previous employer, Mr. Stephane Rambaud-Measson, for opening me the doors of the railway industry and for passing on to me their knowledge and passion for this fascinating sector. I would also like to thank Dr. Ayadi Soufiane, the surgeon who successfully removed my infected appendix in Tunis, which allowed me to continue my work unimpeded. 2 Acknowledgements_____________________________________________________2 Table of Contents_______________________________________________________3 Introduction___________________________________________________________4 Part I: Understanding the political benefits of railway infrastructures______________6 1) The economic and social benefits of rail_____________________________6 2) Rail as a nation building infrastructure, a tool of power________________12 3) Rail as a region building infrastructure, a tool of integration____________19 Part II:
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Train Companies Ferry Companies Public Transport Companies
    The following railway companies accept Interrail Passes on board their services: Public Ferry Country Train companies transport companies companies ÖBB, plus the private train S-Bahn: Vienna and Austria companies ROeEE / - Innsbruck GYSEV, Westbahn and RegioJet Belgium NMBS / SNCB - - Bosnia ZFBH - - Herzegovina Bulgaria BDZ - - Croatia HZ - - ČD, and private train companies: LEO Czech Republic - - Express and RegioJet DSB, and private train companies: Denmark Arriva, DSB S-Tog, DSB-Øresund Fjord Line - and Nordjydske Jernbaner VR and private bus companies: Veljekset Finnlines, Tallink Finland - Salmela and Net-matkat Silja Oy, Viking Line France SNCF - Irish Ferries Deutsche Bahn (DB) and various private Germany companies (see pdf-document for Finnlines S-bahn complete list) Great Britain National Rail and several others Irish Ferries, Stena - Line Greece TRAINOSE - Superfast Ferries, Minoan Lines, Grimaldi Lines, Blue Star Ferries MÁV-START and private railway Hungary - - company: GySEV/Raaberbahn Irish Ferries, Stena Ireland Irish Rail / NI Railways - Line Grimaldi Lines, Trenitalia and Trenord, Leonardo Superfast Ferries, Italy Express (Roma Termini to Fiumicino - Blue Star Ferries, Airport) and Micotra Minoan Lines Lithuania Lietuvos Gelezinkeliai Luxembourg CFL - - FYR Macedonia MZ - - Montenegro ŽCG - - NS and private railway companies: The Netherlands Arriva, Connexxion, Keolis, Syntus, Stena Line - Veolia and DB Regio Norway NSB Fjord Line - PKP and local-government run Poland companies: Koleje Dolnoslaskie and Finnlines - Przewozy Regionalne Portugal CP - - Romania CFR - - Serbia SV (Serbian Railways) - - ZSSK, and private railway companies: Slovakia - - LEO Express and RegioJet Slovenia SZ - - Spain RENFE including FEVE Balearia, Grimaldi - Lines SJ and private railway companies: Ländstrafiken in Arlanda Express, Arriva, Inlandsbanan, innlines, Tallink Silja Norbotten, Sweden JLT, Norrtåg, Skånetrafiken, Oy, Viking Line, Veljekset Salmela, Tågkompaniet, Värmlandstrafik and Destination Gotland Net-matkat Västtrafik.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Safety Control Structure of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, Using System – Theoretic Approach
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY ADDIS ABABA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING UNDER RAILWAY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STREAM DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM – THEORETIC APPROACH A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science In Railway Mechanical Engineering By: Gemta Kedjela ID NO. GSR/3806/05 Advisor: DR.Gulelat Gatew March, 2015 Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School Of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Under Railway Mechanical Engineering Stream DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM –THEORETIC APPROACH By: Gemta Kedjela Approved by: Board of Examiners Chairman of Department Signature Date Graduate Committee (DGC) Dr. Gulelat Gatew. Advisor Signature Date Internal examiner Signature Date External examiner Signature Date Associate Dean, Research and graduate program Signature Date DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work which is being presented in this thesis entitled, “DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM –THEORETIC APPROACH ” is original work of my own, has not been presented for a degree of any other university and all the resource of materials uses for this thesis have been duly acknowledged. Gemta Kedjela Date This is to certify that the above declaration made by the candidate is correct to the best of my knowledge. Dr.Gulelat Gatew Date Development of Safety Control Structure of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, using System –Theoretic Approach ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, I would like to thank my almighty God, for what he has done to me, during those hard times.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal, November 2005
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Nepal, November 2005 COUNTRY PROFILE: NEPAL November 2005 COUNTRY Formal Name: Kingdom of Nepal (“Nepal Adhirajya” in Nepali). Short Form: Nepal. Term for Citizen(s): Nepalese. Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Kathmandu. Major Cities: According to the 2001 census, only Kathmandu had a population of more than 500,000. The only other cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants were Biratnagar, Birgunj, Lalitpur, and Pokhara. Independence: In 1768 Prithvi Narayan Shah unified a number of states in the Kathmandu Valley under the Kingdom of Gorkha. Nepal recognizes National Unity Day (January 11) to commemorate this achievement. Public Holidays: Numerous holidays and religious festivals are observed in particular regions and by particular religions. Holiday dates also may vary by year and locality as a result of the multiple calendars in use—including two solar and three lunar calendars—and different astrological calculations by religious authorities. In fact, holidays may not be observed if religious authorities deem the date to be inauspicious for a specific year. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Sahid Diwash (Martyrs’ Day; movable date in January); National Unity Day and birthday of Prithvi Narayan Shah (January 11); Maha Shiva Ratri (Great Shiva’s Night, movable date in February or March); Rashtriya Prajatantra Diwash (National Democracy Day, movable date in February); Falgu Purnima, or Holi (movable date in February or March); Ram Nawami (Rama’s Birthday, movable date in March or April); Nepali New Year (movable date in April); Buddha’s Birthday (movable date in April or May); King Gyanendra’s Birthday (July 7); Janai Purnima (Sacred Thread Ceremony, movable date in August); Children’s Day (movable date in August); Dashain (Durga Puja Festival, movable set of five days over a 15-day period in September or October); Diwali/Tihar (Festival of Lights and Laxmi Puja, movable set of five days in October); and Sambhidhan Diwash (Constitution Day, movable date in November).
    [Show full text]
  • International Geneva
    International Geneva Directory of Geneva Global Health Actors World Economic Forum | WEF http://www.weforum.org and https://www.weforum.org/system-initiatives/shaping-the-future- of-health-and-healthcare 91- 93 Route de la Capite | CH-1223 Cologny | Geneva Tel +41 22 869 1212 | Fax +41 22 786 2744 | mail: [email protected] BACKGROUND AND MISSION The World Economic Forum is an independent international organisation committed to improving the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape global, regional and industry agendas. WEF is best known for its annual meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. The organisation is impartial, independent and not tied to any specific agendas, governments or interests. It is an officially recognised International Institution for Public- Private Cooperation, being the only international organisation serving in this role. AREAS OF INTEREST Changing economy and the fourth industrial revolution Global commons Global security Public-private partnerships HEALTH-RELATED ACTIVITIES Global health is one of the priority areas of WEF, and the Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare system initiative provides a framework for health promotion and disease prevention along with broad networks and opportunities for public-private cooperation. It aims to ensure that people are healthier and can access the necessary care to fulfil their potential. It addresses the challenge of providing health for the expanding global population, and focuses on both individual and community-related aspects of health. Its global platform includes stakeholders from public, private and civil society spheres, with focus on health, food and beverages, sports, insurance, telecommunications and infra-structure. The goal is to create a credible long term narrative that considers health and health security as an integral part of economic growth and profitability, and to share insights and knowledge arising from the discussions for shaping the global health agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transportation Systems Are Built in Ethiopia
    DELIVERY NOTE June 2017 Light Rail Transportation Systems Are Built in Ethiopia Context PROJECT DATA After decades of sustained economic and population growth coupled with rapid SECTOR: Infrastructure, transportation urbanization, cities in Sub-Saharan Africa are experiencing growing problems DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGE: with traffic congestion. Poor road networks, underinvestment in infrastructure, Building cost-effective public and a lack of mass transit systems exacerbate the problems and negatively affect transportation systems to economic activities and human health. Even though countries in the region reduce traffic congestion and improve road safety in Addis have only 2 percent of the world’s registered vehicles, these countries have some Ababa, Ethiopia of the highest road mortality rates in the world (Marquez 2012). DELIVERY CHALLENGES: Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, is a clear example of the challenges of traffic Skills transfer, weak stakeholder congestion. As one of the fastest-growing metropolises on the continent—with an engagement, inter- and intragovernment relations annual population growth of 3.8 percent (UITP 2014)—the city is struggling to COUNTRY: meet transportation demands. It is also struggling with road safety. Available data Ethiopia from 2015 show more than 10,000 traffic accidents nationwide, with about 418 PROJECT DURATION: deaths resulting from traffic accidents in Addis Ababa alone (Kassa 2015). 2007–present PROJECT AMOUNT: Development Challenge US$475 million REGION: The challenge for Addis Ababa was to build cost-effective public transportation Sub-Saharan Africa systems to reduce traffic congestion and improve road safety. This note was produced by Intervention Carlos Sabatino at the World Bank from an original case study The Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit (LRT) project is a modern transportation published by the Centre for system designed to improve mass transit options and reduce congestion in Public Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport
    STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]