Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. This study is issued without formal editing. ii Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 6 1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON BORDER CROSSING BY RAILWAY ............................. 12 A International Conventions and Agreements ................................................................ 12 1. Railway transport conventions and agreements ....................................................... 12 1.1. OSJD Agreements ......................................................................................................... 13 1.2. COTIF ............................................................................................................................ 14 1.3. Initiatives on unification of railway transport regimes ................................................ 16 2. Customs related Conventions .................................................................................... 18 2.1. Revised Kyoto Convention............................................................................................ 18 2.2. Customs Convention on Containers ............................................................................. 19 2.3. Other Customs related Conventions ............................................................................ 19 3. Conventions on Facilitation and Harmonization on Frontier Controls ...................... 19 B Regional Agreements and Initiatives .............................................................................. 20 1. Trans-Asian Railway Network ................................................................................... 20 2. Regional Cooperation Framework for Facilitation of International Railway Transport (ESCAP) .................................................................................................................... 21 C Subregional Agreements ..................................................................................................... 22 1. Eurasian Economic Union .......................................................................................... 22 2. Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) ............................................................ 24 3. TTFA ........................................................................................................................... 24 4. TRACECA .................................................................................................................... 25 5. ASEAN ........................................................................................................................ 26 D Bilateral agreements on railway transport .................................................................. 26 2 REVIEW OF RAILWAY BORDER CROSSING PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES ....... 30 A Major Railway Border Crossings in ESCAP region...................................................... 34 1. Zabaykalsk (Russian Federation) - Manzhouli (China) .................................................. 34 2. Erenhot (China) - Zamyn Uud (Mongolia) ..................................................................... 48 3. Sukhbaatar (Mongolia) - Naushki (Russian Federation) ............................................... 56 4. Alashankou (China) - Dostyk (Kazakhstan) ................................................................... 62 5. Pingxiang (China) – Dong Dang (Viet Nam) .................................................................. 77 6. Padang Besar (Malaysia) - Padang Besar (Thailand) .................................................... 84 7. Sarakhs (Islamic Republic of Iran) - Saraks (Turkmenistan). ......................................... 91 iii 8. Raxaul (India) - Birgunj (Nepal) ................................................................................... 100 B Overview of railway border crossing issues in freight transport by rail ......... 106 3 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 114 A Break of gauge ....................................................................................................................... 114 B Railways to railways and railways to Customs information sharing ................ 115 1. Use electronic information systems for sharing information .................................. 115 2. Railways to railways electronic data interchange (EDI) .......................................... 119 3. Information exchange between railways and control authorities .......................... 127 C Standardized, harmonized and reduced documentary requirements ............. 131 1. Participation in major arrangements on international railway transport .............. 131 2. Use of a common railway consignment note .......................................................... 132 3. Reduced data and document requirements ............................................................ 134 C Single Window and Government to Government information exchange ........ 135 1. Standardization and harmonization of data requirements ..................................... 135 2. Rail Transport Single Window Facility/System ........................................................ 138 3. Government-to-Government electronic information exchange .............................. 139 E Good practices regarding Customs and OGA formalities ....................................... 141 1. Pre-arrival information, risk assessment and selective controls ............................. 141 2. Use of a railway consignment note as a customs declaration ................................ 142 3. Use of new technologies and non-intrusive inspections .......................................... 144 4. Simplification for customs transit procedures at railway border crossings............. 149 5. Joint controls by border agencies at the railway border crossings ......................... 153 F Border crossing facilitation for container block trains ......................................... 158 4 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING MECHANISM ............... 164 A Available tools for performance measurement and key performance indicators on border crossing by railway ................................................................... 164 1. ESCAP Time Cost Distance Methodology ................................................................. 164 2. CAREC Corridor Performance Measurement and Monitoring ................................. 167 3. WCO Time Release Study ......................................................................................... 169 4. OSJD Standards Time Targets ................................................................................. 172 5. Other performance indicators and monitoring tools .............................................. 173 B Recommended monitoring mechanism ....................................................................... 175 iv Annexes Annex 1 – List of International Legal Instruments .......................................................... 179 Annex 2 – Recommendations for simplification and harmonization of customs procedures ............................................................................................................... 184 Annex 3 – Railway Border Crossing Points along Trans Asian Railway .................. 187 Annex 4 – Case Study of Rezekne railway border crossing in Latvia ........................ 190 Annex 5 – List of Bilateral / Tripartite Agreements ....................................................... 199 Annex 6 - Questionnaire on Country
Recommended publications
  • Fourth Report to the Council and the European Parliament on Monitoring Development in the Rail Market
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2014 COM(2014) 353 final PART 1/2 REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market {SWD(2014) 186 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Evolution of internal market in rail services................................................................ 4 1.1. The objectives of the White Paper on Transport (2011).............................................. 4 1.2. The passenger rail market today .................................................................................. 5 1.3. Evolution of the passenger rail market......................................................................... 8 1.4. The rail freight market today........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Evolution of the rail freight market.............................................................................. 9 2. Evolution of the internal market in services to be supplied to railway undertakings 11 2.1. Stations....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Stations across the European Union........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Ownership and management...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Access
    [Show full text]
  • Model on Integrated Controls at Border Crossings
    MODEL ON INTEGRATED CONTROLS AT BORDER CROSSINGS 2012 The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this publication are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of firm names and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. This publication is issued without formal editing. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The present publication was prepared by Transport Division, ESCAP, with assistance of Mr. Oleg Kazennov as a consultant for the study of this Model. The study was managed by Mr. Fedor Kormilitsyn, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section, Transport Division, ESCAP, under the guidance of Mr. Li Yuwei, Chief of the Section. The study was made under a project entitled “Deepening Asian Connectivity-Capacity building for trade and transport facilitation through ICT development”, which was jointly implemented by Trade and Investment Division, Transport Division, and ICT and Disaster Risk Reduction Division, ESCAP. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP secretariat to (in chronological order): the State Customs Committee of Kyrgyzstan; Khorgos International Centre for Boundary Cooperation, Kazakhstan; Erlian, Inner Mongolia Province, China, organized by the General Administration of Customs of China; and Zamyyn-Uud, Mongolia, organized by the Ministry of Road, Transport, Construction and Urban Development of Mongolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolian Transport Policy on Operational Connectivity for Integrated Intermodal Transport and Logistics in the Region
    MONGOLIAN TRANSPORT POLICY ON OPERATIONAL CONNECTIVITY FOR INTEGRATED INTERMODAL TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN THE REGION Forum on Sustainable transport connectivity between Europe and Asia in the framework of the 62 session of UNECE and Working party on Intermodal transport and Logistics 30 OCTOBER 2019, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND Ministry of Road and Transport Development of MongoliaMongolia Page 1 CONTENT General information Legal framework and Intergovernmental Agreements Operational practice along international corridors Facilitation measures for international railway transport Vision and challenges MinistryMinistry of of Road Road and and Transport Transport Development Development of of Mongolia Mongolia – Regional MeetingUNESCAP Page 2 Mongolia is one of largest landlocked countries in the world, with a territory extending over 1.5 million square kilometers. It is bordered by Peoples Republic of China on three sides, to the East, South and West and by Russian Federation to the North. The country is rich in a variety of mineral resources and has substantial livestock herds, ranking first in per capita ownership in the world. Mongolia is a sparsely populated country, with a population of around 3.2 million, with population density of 2 persons per square kilometers. However, more than 60 percent of the population live in urban area. The construction of new roads and the maintenance of existing ones are being given high priority of the Mongolian Government. As part of the Government of Mongolia’s 2016-2020 action plan road and transport sector’s objective is to expand and develop transport and logistics network that supports economic improvement, meet social needs and requirements and provides safe and comfortable service.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparatory Survey on Vientiane Logistics Park (VLP) Project (PPP Infrastructure Project) in Lao P.D.R
    Ministry of Public Works and Transport Lao Peoople’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) Preparatory Survey on Vientiane Logistics Park (VLP) Project (PPP Infrastructure Project) In Lao P.D.R. Final Report July 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Nippon Express Co., Ltd. Nittsu Research Institute and Consulting, Inc. Nittsu Real Estate Co., Ltd. OS International Development Center of Japan Inc. JR 15-054 Ministry of Public Works and Transport Lao Peoople’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) Preparatory Survey on Vientiane Logistics Park (VLP) Project (PPP Infrastructure Project) In Lao P.D.R. Final Report July 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Nippon Express Co., Ltd. Nittsu Research Institute and Consulting, Inc. Nittsu Real Estate Co., Ltd. International Development Center of Japan Inc. Exchange Rate (February 2015) 1USD=118.59JPN 1THB=3.64JPN 1KIP=0.015JPN Preparatory Survey on Vientiane logistics Park (VLP) Project in Lao PDR. Final Report Preparatory Survey on Vientiane Logistics Park (VLP) Project (PPP Infrastructure Project) in Lao P.D.R. Final Report Summary 1. Project Name Vientiane Logistics Park (VLP) (1) Project Site The Thanaleng area where the VLP is planned is located 15 km east-west from downtown Vientiane. It lies opposite Nong Khai Municipality of Thailand, so that Thanaleng has been traditionally a strategic place as a river-crossing point. In 1993, the first Friendship Bridge was completed at the Thanaleng area, which continues to hold its strategic position as an international cross border point. Dongphosy Forest is located approximately 3 km north from the bridge, which is under Vientiane Capital. The railway passes through the forest, and the Thanaleng station is located 3.5 km from the bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal
    IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 Logistics Capacity Assessment Nepal Country Name Nepal Official Name Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal Regional Bureau Bangkok, Thailand Assessment Assessment Date: From 16 October 2009 To: 6 November 2009 Name of the assessors Rich Moseanko – World Vision International John Jung – World Vision International Rajendra Kumar Lal – World Food Programme, Nepal Country Office Title/position Email contact At HQ: [email protected] 1/105 IA LCA – Nepal 2009 Version 1.05 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1. Introduction / Background.........................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Humanitarian Background ........................................................................................................................................6 1.3. National Regulatory Departments/Bureau and Quality Control/Relevant Laboratories ......................................16 1.4. Customs Information...............................................................................................................................................18 2. Logistics Infrastructure .....................................................................................................................................................33 2.1. Port Assessment .....................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • VR Annual Report 1963
    1963 VICTORIA VICTORIAN RAILWAYS REPORT OF THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 1963 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT 7 ELIZABETH 11. No. 6355 By Authority: A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE. No. 19.-[68. 3n.].-12005/63. CONTENTS PAGE CoMMISSIONERs' REPORT l HEADS OF BRANCHES 2:3 APPENDICEs-­ APPENDIX Balance-sheet l 24 Financial Results (Totals), Summary of 2 26 Financial Results (Details), Summary of 2A 27 Reconciliation of Railway and Treasury Figures (Revenue and Working Expenses), 3 2H Working Expenses, Abstract of 4 2n Working Expenses and Earnings, Comparative Analysis of 5 :30 Total Cost of Each Line and of Rolling Stock, &c. 6 :p- General Comparative Statement for Last Fifteen Years 7 :3H Statistics : Passengers, Goods Traffic, &c. 8 41 Mileage : Train, Locomotive, and Vehicle 9 42 Salaries and Wages, Total Amount Paid 10 44 Staff Employed in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 ll 45 Locomotives, Coaching Stock, Goods and Service Stock on Books 12 46 Railway Accident and Fire Insurance Fund ... 13 49 New Lines Opened for Traffic or Under Construction, &c. 14 iiO Mileage of Railways and Tracks 15 ;)] Railways Stores Suspense Account 16 iiz Railway Renewals and Replacements Fund 17 52 Depreciation-Provision and Accrual 18 52 Capital Expenditure in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 19 ii3 Passenger Traffic and Revenue, Analysis of ... 20 ii4 Goods and Live Stock Traffic and Revenue, Analysis ot 21 55 Traffic at Each Station 22 ii6 His Excellency Sir Rohan Delacombe, Governor of Vi ctoria, and Lady Delacombe about to entrain at Spencer Street for a visit to western Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal, November 2005
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Nepal, November 2005 COUNTRY PROFILE: NEPAL November 2005 COUNTRY Formal Name: Kingdom of Nepal (“Nepal Adhirajya” in Nepali). Short Form: Nepal. Term for Citizen(s): Nepalese. Click to Enlarge Image Capital: Kathmandu. Major Cities: According to the 2001 census, only Kathmandu had a population of more than 500,000. The only other cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants were Biratnagar, Birgunj, Lalitpur, and Pokhara. Independence: In 1768 Prithvi Narayan Shah unified a number of states in the Kathmandu Valley under the Kingdom of Gorkha. Nepal recognizes National Unity Day (January 11) to commemorate this achievement. Public Holidays: Numerous holidays and religious festivals are observed in particular regions and by particular religions. Holiday dates also may vary by year and locality as a result of the multiple calendars in use—including two solar and three lunar calendars—and different astrological calculations by religious authorities. In fact, holidays may not be observed if religious authorities deem the date to be inauspicious for a specific year. The following holidays are observed nationwide: Sahid Diwash (Martyrs’ Day; movable date in January); National Unity Day and birthday of Prithvi Narayan Shah (January 11); Maha Shiva Ratri (Great Shiva’s Night, movable date in February or March); Rashtriya Prajatantra Diwash (National Democracy Day, movable date in February); Falgu Purnima, or Holi (movable date in February or March); Ram Nawami (Rama’s Birthday, movable date in March or April); Nepali New Year (movable date in April); Buddha’s Birthday (movable date in April or May); King Gyanendra’s Birthday (July 7); Janai Purnima (Sacred Thread Ceremony, movable date in August); Children’s Day (movable date in August); Dashain (Durga Puja Festival, movable set of five days over a 15-day period in September or October); Diwali/Tihar (Festival of Lights and Laxmi Puja, movable set of five days in October); and Sambhidhan Diwash (Constitution Day, movable date in November).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Transport Sector
    Chapter 4 Transport Sector January 2021 This chapter should be cited as Study team (2021), ‘Transport Sector’, in Mongolian Energy Institute and ERIA (eds.), Mongolia’s Energy Efficiency Indicators 2019. ERIA Research Project Report FY2020 no. 17, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.30-44. Chapter 4 Transport Sector 1. Energy Efficiency Indicators in the Transport Sector Like other sectors, energy efficiency indicators (EEIs) in transport are in principle results of dividing energy consumption by the sector’s activity. Based on type of activity, the transport sector is broken down into freight and passenger transport (Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2). For each activity type, we estimate the indicators in a bottom-up manner. Based on the survey results, we estimate the EEIs starting from the vehicle type. For example, in passenger road transport, we start estimating the indicators for road vehicles with sedans, buses, and taxis whilst for freight road, we start with trucks. Figure 4-1 Pyramid of Passenger Transport Indicators Source: IEA (2014b). 30 Figure 4-2 Pyramid of Freight Transport Indicators Source: IEA (2014b). For passenger transport, EEIs are calculated in gigajoules/passenger-km (GJ/pass-km). For freight transport, the indicators are given in gigajoules/ton-km (GJ/ton-km). For both passenger and freight transport, calculation results of EEIs are in terms of GJ/vehicle-km. Multiplying the estimated EEIs with transport demand in terms of vehicle-km, passenger-km (for passengers), and ton-km (for freight), we can move up to the higher level of the pyramid to calculate the total energy consumption of the transport sector, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness
    National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Final Report 525 The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal Shipping by Asaf Ashar James R. Amdal UNO Department of Planning and Urban Studies NCITEC National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness Supported by: 4101 Gourrier Avenue | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 | (225) 767-9131 | www.ltrc.lsu.edu TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/LA.525 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Impact of Modifying the Jones Act on US Coastal June 2014 Shipping 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Asaf Ashar, Professor Research, UNOTI LTRC Project Number: 13-8SS James R. Amdal, Sr. Research Associate, UNOTI State Project Number: 30000766 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of New Orleans Department of Planning and Urban Studies 11. Contract or Grant No. 368 Milneburg Hall, 2000 Lakeshore Dr. New Orleans, LA 70148 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Department of Transportation and Final Report Development July 2012 – December 2013 P.O. Box 94245 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The study assesses exempt coastal shipping defined as exempted from the US-built stipulation of the Jones Act, operating with functional crews and exempted from Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT). The study focuses on two research questions: (a) the impact of the US-built exemption on the cost of coastal shipping; and (b) the competitiveness of exempt services.
    [Show full text]
  • ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (Draft)
    International Conference on “how to improve safety at and around level crossings” ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (draft) 1. Riga, 10 June 2016 a. Venue: Latvian Railway Museum, Riga, Uzvaras bulv. 2A ; Latvia 09:30 – 10.00 – registration, welcome coffee (with compliments of OPTEX) www.optex-europe.com 10:00 – 10.50 – opening (official speeches, media/public event) Keynote Speakers : 1. Ministry of Transport (tbc) 2. SJSC “Latvian Railways”, Chairman of the Board and President, Mr. Edvins Berzins 3. UIC: Mr. Peter Gerhardt/Head of UIC Safety Unit 11.00 – 13.00 Presentations (1 st part) • 11:00-11:20 Agency TBWA Latvija: Mrs. Anna Ranc āne, Strategist; Mr. Edijs Vucens, Head of Media Arts: “SJSC “Latvian Railway” Safety Campaign “Don’t overestimate your abilities near railways”” • 11:20-11:40 University of Latvia: Mr. Ivars Austers, Professor of Social Psychology: “Railway crossing safety: Self-reported risk perception and behaviours in population of Latvia” • 11:40-12:00 Latvian Road Traffic Safety Directorate: Mrs. Valda Kjaspere: „Cooperation between different organizations in order to decrease number of accidents“ • 12:00-12:20 Operation Lifesaver Estonia (OLE): Mrs. Getter Toome: "Educational material for driving schools” • 12:20-12:40 PKP (Polish Railways): Mrs. Katarzyna Kucharek, “Activities at rail- road level crossings carried out in Poland” • 12:40-13:00 OPTEX, Mr. Dale Jones: “Lidar” to detect larger objects and vehicles” + product exhibited 13:00 – 14.00 – lunch (with compliments of LDz) + exhibition 14.00 – 16.00 – Presentations (2 nd part) • 14:00 – 14:30 Inspector Becky Warren , British Transport Police, UK Network Rail, UK: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nong Khai Nong Khai Nong Khai 3 Mekong River
    Nong Khai Nong Khai Nong Khai 3 Mekong River 4 Nong Khai 4 CONTENTS HOW TO GET THERE 7 ATTRACTIONS 9 Amphoe Mueang Nong khai 9 Amphoe Tha Bo 16 Amphoe Si Chiang Mai 17 Amphoe Sangkhom 18 Amphoe Phon Phisai 22 Amphoe Rattanawapi 23 EVENTS AND FESTIVALS 25 LOCAL PRODUCTS 25 SOUVENIR SHOPS 26 SUGGESTED ITINERARY 26 FACILITIES 27 Accommodations 27 Restaurants 30 USEFUL CALLS 31 Nong Khai 5 5 Wat Aranyabanpot Nong Khai 6 Thai Term Glossary a rebellion. King Rama III appointed Chao Phraya Amphoe: District Ratchathewi to lead an army to attack Vientiane. Ban: Village The army won with the important forces Hat: Beach supported by Thao Suwothanma (Bunma), Khuean: Dam the ruler of Yasothon, and Phraya Chiangsa. Maenam: River The king, therefore, promoted Thao Suwo to Mueang: Town or City be the ruler of a large town to be established Phrathat: Pagoda, Stupa on the right bank of the Mekong River. The Prang: Corn-shaped tower or sanctuary location of Ban Phai was chosen for the town SAO: Subdistrict Administrative Organization called Nong Khai, which was named after a very Soi: Alley large pond to the west. Song Thaeo: Pick-up trucks but with a roof Nong Khai is 615 kilometres from Bangkok, over the back covering an area of around 7,332 square Talat: Market kilometres. This province has the longest Tambon: Subdistrict distance along the Mekong River; measuring Tham: Cave 320 kilometres. The area is suitable for Tuk-Tuks: Three-wheeled motorized taxis agriculture and freshwater fishery. It is also Ubosot or Bot: Ordination hall in a temple a major tourist attraction where visitors can Wihan: Image hall in a temple easily cross the border into Laos.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolia – Russia – China “Economic Corridor”: Ongoing Processes and Implementation Mechanism
    MONGOLIA – RUSSIA – CHINA “ECONOMIC CORRIDOR”: ONGOING PROCESSES AND IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM ENKHBOLD Vorshilov (Ph.D) Director General Department of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs Program of Mongolia-Russia-China Economic Corridor Third Summit (June 2016, Tashkent) • Leaders of Mongolia, Russia and China signed the Program of China- Mongolia-Russia Economic corridor (32 projects) Fields of Cooperation: • Transportation infrastructure -13 • Cooperation in industrial sector - 2 • Development of border- crossing points - 5 Sponsors: • Cooperation in energy sector - 1 . Government budget • Environment and ecology - 3 . Private sector investment • Education, science and technology cooperation - 3 . PPP • Humanitarian - 3 Financing Sources: • Agriculture - 1 • Health - 1 . Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank . BRICS New Development Bank . Silk Road Fund . Other national and multilateral financial institutions Railway Transit Corridors TSAGAAN Northern NAUSHKI TOLGOI SUKHBAATAR SOLOVEVSK ARTS SUURI Corridor ERDENET BULGAN TAKASHIKEN BICHIGT Eastern Western Corridor Corridor ERLIAN Central Corridor Road Transit Corridors KYAKHTA SOLOVEVSK ALTANBULAG TASHANTA EREENTSAV ULAAN BAISHINT BULGAN TAKASHIKEN BICHIGT AH-4 Eastern Corridor ZAMIIN-UUD ERLIAN AH-3 Trilateral Expert 1st meeting for Economic Corridor Implementation TRILATERAL EXPERT 1ST MEETING • First meeting was held in Beijing on 24 Mar 2017. • Following respective government agencies’ officials from three countries represented; - Ministry of Foreign
    [Show full text]