DOCSLIB.ORG

European Union's Top Court Has Deemed Kosher and Halal Slaughter Incompatible with Animal Welfare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Union's Top Court Has Deemed Kosher and Halal Slaughter Incompatible with Animal Welfare Table of Contents • Opinion: ECJ ruling to uphold ban on kosher, halal slaughter a disastrous decision • EU-CHINA: Advocacy for the Uyghur issue • Europe's Muslims are European. Stop outsourcing their plight to foreign leaders • Restrictions on religious freedom in Europe in the name of the fight against COVID-19 • 48 MEPs call upon the EU to appoint a Special Envoy on FoRB • EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement but 14 Protestants still in prison • EU Statement on the situation of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia • Churches-EU Dialogue: COMECE and CEC meet with the Croatian EU Presidency • The EU must work for Freedom of Religion or Belief for all Opinion: ECJ ruling to uphold ban on kosher, halal slaughter a disastrous decision Deutsche Welle (18.12.2020) - https://bit.ly/2WBcim0 - The European Union's top court has deemed kosher and halal slaughter incompatible with animal welfare. This is a grim day for religious freedom in Europe, writes Christoph Strack. Human Rights Without Frontiers FoRB Newsletter | European Union In Europe, leaders often laud the continent's Judeo-Christian heritage. Not only that, 75 years after the industrial mass murder of European Jews in the Shoa, German and European leaders celebrate the return of flourishing Jewish life on the continent. They welcome the fact that liberal, conservative and orthodox Jews are once more part of Europe's social fabric. But for how much longer, given the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling that upheld a ban on kosher and halal slaughter in Belgium? The practice is only banned in two or three Belgian regions. Belgium's top court had called on the ECJ to determine whether the ban on kosher and halal slaughter — i.e. without stunning the animal — is compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and its enshrined principle of religious freedom. The bloc's top court ruled the ban legal, dealing a blow to pious Jews and Muslims across Europe. Tolerance For decades, there have been heated political discussions in Europe over whether to outlaw ritual slaughters. Several courts have ruled on the issue as well — including in Germany. Within the past 20 years, Germany's constitutional court often examined the issue, reaching wise verdicts in favor of religious freedom. The court has upheld the ban on stun-free slaughter — but with exceptions that may apply for those who, for religious reasons, say they can only consume kosher or halal meat. This right, therefore, applies to Jews and Muslims alike, as this is a question of religious freedom broadly speaking. DW's religions expert Christoph Strack As European societies grow progressively secular, more and more people take offense to certain religious practices. This pertains to certain rituals, religious needs and sensitivities; religion is no longer taken as seriously as it once was. A recently planned protest march of coronavirus deniers and conspiracy theorists, for instance, was allowed to go ahead after being rebranded as a religious service. This makes a mockery of religion, even though some may have secretly admired the protesters for thinking on their feet. Measures to curb the coronavirus outbreak, and how they have been publicly communicated, have not always been easy to stomach for religious people. Sure, German Health Minister Jens Spahn, Foreign Minister Heiko Mass and Justice Minister Christine Lambrecht joining Berlin's Jewish community to light Chanukah candles — all while social distancing — sent a strong message of solidarity. Yet the introduction of Human Rights Without Frontiers FoRB Newsletter | European Union nighttime curfews in parts of Germany, even on Christmas Eve, has irked many Christians, for whom Christmas services are among the most cherished events of the year. Jews and Muslims join forces But back to kosher and halal slaughter. We should be able to tolerate people's religious practices. In this instance, animal welfare advocates are at loggerheads with religious representatives. Germany's top court, which has ruled on the issue, imposed strict limitations on ritual slaughters. It allows certain exceptions that allow religious people to be able to continue practicing their faith in Germany. Bans on such forms of animal slaughter in Belgium, and elsewhere, arose over debates over the way Islam is practiced in Europe. Individuals sought to impose tighter rules on Islam on the continent — yet also hit Europe's Jews. Muslim and Jewish representatives joined forces in challenging the Belgian ban in court. And several months ago, Pinchas Goldschmidt of the Conference of European Rabbis (CER) and Muhammad bin Abdul Karim Issa of theMuslim World League even published a joint letter — replete with a joint letterhead — on the issue. Jews, again, forced out of Europe? Back then, Jewish leaders were worried that if EU judges upheld the Belgian ban on kosher slaughter, other countries could follow suit. They projected that this would compel thousands of Jews to leave Europe. Now, the ECJ has spoken on the matter. This is a very sad, indeed fateful, day for religious freedom in Europe. And by the way: Do not stress the absolute primacy of animal welfare and turn a blind eye to Europe's meat industry. Consulting the figures quickly shows that kosher and halal slaughter are a marginal issue compared to any one of the continent's meat processing plants, where livestock are pumped full of chemicals, industrially killed and processed. Granted, they are stunned before being killed. But this is merely to soothe one's conscience. This opinion piece was translated from German. Further reading European Court upholds Flemish restrictions on halal and kosher slaughter (Howard Friedman, Religion Clause) EU states can ban kosher and halal ritual slaughter, court rules (Arthur Neslen, Politico) Ban on ritual animal slaughter upheld by EU high court (Molly Quell, Courthouse News Service) In order to promote animal welfare in the contextof ritual slaughter, Member States may, without infringing the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, require a reversible stunning procedure which cannot result in the animal’s death (PDF) (Court of Justice of the European Union) EU states can require stunning before ritual slaughter (Associated Press) EU-CHINA: Advocacy for the Uyghur issue Speech on behalf of HR/VP Borrell at the European Parliament on forced labour and the situation of the Uighurs in Xinjiang Human Rights Without Frontiers FoRB Newsletter | European Union Madam President, Honourable Members of the European Parliament, EEAS (17.212.2020) - https://bit.ly/3p7IWIo - The European Union has spoken out clearly and repeatedly on the situation of Uighurs: expressing grave concerns about political re-education camps, surveillance, and restrictions on freedom of religion and belief. As High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell mentioned during the debate on the situation of Uighurs one year ago: “the policies applied to Xinjiang appear disproportionate to the stated aim of fighting against terrorism and extremism”. The conclusions of United Nations experts expressing serious concerns are, regretfully, still valid. During the past year, a number of reports have brought to light worrying allegations that Uighurs and other minorities in China are subject to forced labour and forced labour transfer schemes, as well as forced sterilisation and forced birth control. They add to the gravity and magnitude of concerns we already expressed. EU leaders raised these concerns in their meetings with Chinese leaders this year: at the EU-China Summit on 22 June and at the EU-China Leaders’ Meeting on 14 September. We also issued a comprehensive statement during the last UN Human Rights Council, under the ‘Item 4’ debate on human rights situations that require the Council’s attention. We clearly highlighted the need for meaningful access to the region for independent experts. We will continue to call on China to uphold its national and international obligations, and to respect human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, especially in Xinjiang and Tibet. Defending human rights and combatting forced labour are priorities for the EU. As a key trading partner of the EU, China should ensure that business activities in its territory meet international standards on labour rights and responsible business conduct. We expect the Chinese authorities to implement those standards across all sectors of production and at all levels of supply chains. Responsible business practices by European companies working in China play a very important role. While the Commission is working on a legislative proposal on sustainable corporate governance, the EU already has mandatory standards in some sectors and actively promotes international guidelines. European companies are already encouraged to implement effective due diligence practices across their supply chains. The Commission and the European External Action Service will continue working with companies to underscore the importance of taking up international due diligence guidelines in all aspects, including human rights. The new EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, adopted on 7 December [2020], enables the EU to forcefully stand up for human rights. It allows the EU to target human rights violations and abuses worldwide, irrespective of where they occur. The regime does not contain any listings yet; however, we expect discussions on listings to start soon. I thank you all for your engagement in this debate and your contributions to further increase the awareness on this matter. Thank you. Link to the video: https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-200285 Human Rights Without Frontiers FoRB Newsletter | European Union Europe's Muslims are European. Stop outsourcing their plight to foreign leaders For EU leaders to seek solutions abroad to end prejudice against millions of their own citizens is insulting and meaningless. By Shada Islam The Guardian (13.11.2020) - https://bit.ly/376uDMO - Terror attacks in France and Austria have put Europe’s 25 million Muslims back in the spotlight.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
    Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • Italie / Italy
    ITALIE / ITALY LEGA (LIGUE – LEAGUE) Circonscription nord-ouest 1. Salvini Matteo 11. Molteni Laura 2. Andreina Heidi Monica 12. Panza Alessandro 3. Campomenosi Marco 13. Poggio Vittoria 4. Cappellari Alessandra 14. Porro Cristina 5. Casiraghi Marta 15. Racca Marco 6. Cattaneo Dante 16. Sammaritani Paolo 7. Ciocca Angelo 17. Sardone Silvia Serafina (eurodeputato uscente) 18. Tovaglieri Isabella 8. Gancia Gianna 19. Zambelli Stefania 9. Lancini Danilo Oscar 20. Zanni Marco (eurodeputato uscente) (eurodeputato uscente) 10. Marrapodi Pietro Antonio Circonscription nord-est 1. Salvini Matteo 8. Dreosto Marco 2. Basso Alessandra 9. Gazzini Matteo 3. Bizzotto Mara 10. Ghidoni Paola (eurodeputato uscente) 11. Ghilardelli Manuel 4. Borchia Paolo 12. Lizzi Elena 5. Cipriani Vallì 13. Occhi Emiliano 6. Conte Rosanna 14. Padovani Gabriele 7. Da Re Gianantonio detto Toni 15. Rento Ilenia Circonscription centre 1. Salvini Matteo 9. Pastorelli Stefano 2. Baldassarre Simona Renata 10. Pavoncello Angelo 3. Adinolfi Matteo 11. Peppucci Francesca 4. Alberti Jacopo 12. Regimenti Luisa 5. Bollettini Leo 13. Rinaldi Antonio Maria 6. Bonfrisco Anna detta Cinzia 14. Rossi Maria Veronica 7. Ceccardi Susanna 15. Vizzotto Elena 8. Lucentini Mauro Circonscription sud 1. Salvini Matteo 10. Lella Antonella 2. Antelmi Ilaria 11. Petroni Luigi Antonio 3. Calderano Daniela 12. Porpiglia Francesca Anastasia 4. Caroppo Andrea 13. Sapignoli Simona 5. Casanova Massimo 14. Sgro Nadia 6. Cerrelli Giancarlo 15. Sofo Vincenzo 7. D’Aloisio Antonello 16. Staine Emma 8. De Blasis Elisabetta 17. Tommasetti Aurelio 9. Grant Valentino 18. Vuolo Lucia Circonscription insulaire 1. Salvini Matteo 5. Hopps Maria Concetta detta Marico 2. Donato Francesca 6. Pilli Sonia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rezultate Izbora Članova U Europski Parlament
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNO IZBORNO POVJERENSTVO REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE KLASA: 013-08/19-01/70 URBROJ: 507-02/01-19-1 Zagreb, 27. svibnja 2019. Na osnovi članaka 56. i 57. Zakona o izboru članova u Europski parlament iz Republike Hrvatske ("Narodne novine", broj 92/10, 23/13 i 143/13, dalje: Zakon) Državno izborno povjerenstvo Republike Hrvatske, utvrdilo je i objavljuje REZULTATE IZBORA ČLANOVA U EUROPSKI PARLAMENT IZ REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE PROVEDENIH 26. SVIBNJA 2019. GODINE I. Od ukupno 3.696.907 birača, glasovalo je (prema glasačkim listićima) 1.103.551 birača, odnosno 29,85%. Važećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 1.073.954, odnosno 97,32%. Nevažećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 29.597, odnosno 2,68%. II. Pojedine kandidacijske liste i kandidati dobili su sljedeći broj glasova: 1. HRVATSKA DEMOKRATSKA ZAJEDNICA - HDZ 244.076 glasova 22,72% 1. KARLO RESSLER 52.859 glasova 21,65% 2. DUBRAVKA ŠUICA 31.791 glasova 13,02% 3. TOMISLAV SOKOL 4.573 glasova 1,87% 4. ŽELJANA ZOVKO 9.861 glasova 4,04% 5. SUNČANA GLAVAK 9.599 glasova 3,93% 6. MARIJANA BALIĆ 7.365 glasova 3,01% 7. GORAN PAUK 7.824 glasova 3,20% 8. NIKOLINA BRNJAC 2.198 glasova 0,90% 9. STJEPAN RIBIĆ 4.359 glasova 1,78% 10. DOMAGOJ MAROEVIĆ 6.974 glasova 2,85% 11. DANIJEL MARUŠIĆ 9.747 glasova 3,99% 12. STJEPAN ADANIĆ 4.146 glasova 1,69% 2. SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA PARTIJA HRVATSKE - SDP 200.976 glasova 18,71% 1. TONINO PICULA 50.921 glasova 25,33% 2. BILJANA BORZAN 64.736 glasova 32,21% 3. PREDRAG FRED MATIĆ 13.371 glasova 6,65% 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 78 + EPP Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA, Stefan BERGER
    Establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility (Rapporteurs: Eider Gardiazabal Rubial / Siegfried Mureşan / Dragoș Pîslaru) Vote on the provisional agreement resulting from interinstitutional negotiations 78 + EPP Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA, Stefan BERGER, Lefteris CHRISTOFOROU, Markus FERBER, José Manuel FERNANDES, Frances FITZGERALD, Enikő GYŐRI, Mircea- Gheorghe HAVA, Niclas HERBST, Monika HOHLMEIER, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Othmar KARAS, Georgios KYRTSOS, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Aušra MALDEIKIENĖ, Eva MAYDELL, Siegfried MUREŞAN, Luděk NIEDERMAYER, Andrey NOVAKOV, Jan OLBRYCHT, Lídia PEREIRA, Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN, Ralf SEEKATZ, Inese VAIDERE, Rainer WIELAND, Angelika WINZIG S&D Marc ANGEL, Marek BELKA, Robert BIEDROŃ, Paolo DE CASTRO, Jonás FERNÁNDEZ, Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL, Jens GEIER, Elisabetta GUALMINI, Eero HEINÄLUOMA, Pierre LARROUTUROU, Margarida MARQUES, Pedro MARQUES, Costas MAVRIDES, Csaba MOLNÁR, Victor NEGRESCU, Alfred SANT, Joachim SCHUSTER, Pedro SILVA PEREIRA, Paul TANG, Irene TINAGLI, Nils UŠAKOVS RENEW Gilles BOYER, Olivier CHASTEL, Luis GARICANO, Vlad GHEORGHE, Valérie HAYER, Billy KELLEHER, Moritz KÖRNER, Ondřej KOVAŘÍK, Caroline NAGTEGAAL, Dragoș PÎSLARU, Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ, Nils TORVALDS, Stéphanie YON-COURTIN GREENS/EFA Rasmus ANDRESEN, Damian BOESELAGER, Alexandra GEESE, Sven GIEGOLD, Claude GRUFFAT, Stasys JAKELIŪNAS, Philippe LAMBERTS, Piernicola PEDICINI, Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN, Ernest URTASUN, Monika VANA ECR Zbigniew KUŹMIUK, Bogdan RZOŃCA, Cristian TERHEŞ, Roberts ZĪLE THE LEFT Petros KOKKALIS, Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS NI Ioannis LAGOS 5 - ID Gunnar BECK, Joachim KUHS, Jörg MEUTHEN ECR Derk Jan EPPINK NI Lefteris NIKOLAOU-ALAVANOS 13 0 S&D Aurore LALUCQ ID Matteo ADINOLFI, Anna BONFRISCO, Francesca DONATO, Valentino GRANT, Hélène LAPORTE, Antonio Maria RINALDI, Marco ZANNI ECR Raffaele FITTO, Eugen JURZYCA THE LEFT Manon AUBRY, José GUSMÃO, Mick WALLACE .
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
    20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    Next weekend in New Direction 10th Anniversary Dinner p.22 BORDEAUX p.20 ACRE Summer Gala Dinner p.23 Issue #8 | July 2019 A fortnightly Newspaper by the Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) | theconservative.online THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION by Jan Zahradil MEP, President of ACRE For the next five years, we aim to serve as the peoples voice, acting as a counter balance between those who want a federal Europe, and those who want to destroy the Union. We will continue to defend the view that Europe works best when it does less, but it does it better. ith the elec- power handed to those who which would have create a in a position to act as the offi- comes as a result of keeping tion now out of want to use it to build a federal more business friendly Europe. cial opposition in the European power as close to the people as Spitzenkandidat the way, and the Europe. A coalition that will That would have put the sin- Parliament. We’ll hold this new possible. And we remain com- JAN ZAHRADIL political groups be led from the left, with any gle market, rather than social coalition to account, and ensure mitted to the view that our nowW establishing themselves, we voting majority dependent on policy, back at the centre of the that they do not use their new strength comes from a willing- Jan Zahradil was ACRE’s can- can now talk with some clarity the support of the Greens and European Union. That would majority to take power away ness to work together on issues didate for the Presidency of the about what the next five years the socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Supported Amendments
    Amendment 135 Petra Kammerevert, Victor Negrescu, Jens Geier, Ibán García Del Blanco, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Marcos Ros Sempere, Hannes Heide, Łukasz Kohut, Massimiliano Smeriglio, Predrag Fred Matić, Lara Wolters, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Niklas Nienaß, Martina Michels Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 changed the pandemic in early 2020 changed the economic outlook for the years to come in economic outlook for the years to come in the Union and in the world, calling for an the Union and in the world, calling for an urgent and coordinated response from the urgent and coordinated response from the Union in order to cope with the enormous Union in order to cope with the enormous economic and social consequences for all economic and social consequences for all Member. The challenges linked to the Member. The challenges linked to the demographic context have been amplified demographic context, social inclusion and by COVID-19. The current COVID-19 social cohesion have been amplified by pandemic as well as the previous COVID-19. The current COVID-19 economic and financial crisis have shown pandemic as well as the previous that developing sound and resilient economic and financial crisis have shown economies and financial systems built on that developing sound and resilient strong economic and social structures economies and financial systems built on helps Member States to respond more strong economic and social structures efficiently to shocks and recover more helps Member States to respond more swiftly from them.
    [Show full text]