DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume III: Missile Forces, Nuclear and Other Weapons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume III: Missile Forces, Nuclear and Other Weapons The Evolving Military Balance in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia VOLUME III Missile, DPRK and ROK Nuclear Forces, and External Nuclear Forces AUTHORS Anthony H. Cordesman and Ashley Hess A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy JUNE 2013 Blank The Evolving Military Balance in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia VOLUME III Missile, DPRK and ROK Nuclear Forces, and External Nuclear Forces AUTHORS Anthony H. Cordesman and Ashley Hess A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy June 2013 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars are developing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. Former deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre became the Center’s president and chief executive officer in April 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2013 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data CIP information available on request. ISBN: 978-1-4422-2519-0 (pb); 978-1-4422-2520-6 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefield 1800 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org 301-459-3366 | www.rowman.com Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ VII THE MISSILE WARFARE BALANCE ........................................................................................................... VII THE NUCLEAR AND CBRN BALANCE ....................................................................................................... IX THE ROLE OF CHINESE, US, AND OTHER OUTSIDE MISSILE AND NUCLEAR FORCES ...................................... X THE BALANCE OF US AND CHINESE MISSILE AND PRECISION STRIKE FORCES ............................................ XII THE BALANCE OF WEAPONS OF MASS EFFECTIVENESS AND “OFFENSIVE” VS. “DEFENSIVE” WEAPONS ......... XV THE BROADER BALANCE OF US AND CHINESE STRATEGIC AND THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES ........................ XVI US POLICY OPTIONS ............................................................................................................................ XVI VII. KOREAN MISSILE FORCES ...................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW OF DPRK MISSILE DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................ 1 Arsenal and Capabilities .............................................................................................................. 1 DPRK MISSILE PROGRAMS .................................................................................................................... 8 The Hwasong and Toksa Programs ............................................................................................. 8 The Nodong ................................................................................................................................ 10 The Taepodong Program ........................................................................................................... 11 The Musudan ............................................................................................................................. 18 The KN-08 .................................................................................................................................. 19 DPRK MISSILE FACILITIES .................................................................................................................. 22 DPRK AIR DEFENSE AND COUNTER-SPACE CAPABILITIES ....................................................................... 25 ROK MISSILE DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................. 26 The Early Program – The NHK Program ................................................................................... 26 The 2001 MTCR and the Hyunmu-3 Cruise Missile ................................................................ 27 Further Missile Limitation Agreement Revisions ..................................................................... 28 ROK MISSILE DEFENSE AND SPACE ..................................................................................................... 29 Missile Defense ......................................................................................................................... 30 Space .......................................................................................................................................... 32 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 32 VIII. KOREAN WMD FORCES ......................................................................................... 36 DPRK CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS .............................................................................. 37 DPRK CHEMICAL WEAPONS ................................................................................................................ 38 Western Estimates of DPRK Stockpiles and Capacity ............................................................ 39 Korean Estimates of DPRK Stockpiles and Capacity .............................................................. 41 Guesstimates of Key Locations ................................................................................................ 42 DPRK BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS ............................................................................................................. 48 Capabilities ................................................................................................................................. 48 Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 50 DPRK NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................................ 54 Motivations for Acquisition ........................................................................................................ 54 Assessments of Capabilities: Plutonium and Uranium ........................................................... 55 Nuclear Weapons and Warhead Developments ...................................................................... 58 Moves Toward Sanctions .......................................................................................................... 73 Key Current Issues, Weapons Design, and Further Tensions ................................................ 77 ROK and US Response .............................................................................................................. 83 Japanese Response .................................................................................................................. 85 Russian and Chinese Response ............................................................................................... 86 Further DPRK-ROK-US Tensions ............................................................................................... 87 iv Anthony H. Cordesman and Ashley Hess Halting Operations at the ROK-DPRK Joint Industrial Complex at Kaesong .......................... 89 De-escalation .............................................................................................................................. 92 DPRK Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 95 ROK CHEMICAL DEVELOPMENTS ....................................................................................................... 102 ROK BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS..................................................................................................... 102 ROK NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................................ 103 Initial Weapons Research ....................................................................................................... 103 Reprocessing and Enrichment Activities ............................................................................... 104 2010-2013 and the ROK Nuclear Development Debate ..................................................... 105 Civilian Facilities and the 123 Agreement ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Korea Today
    North Korea Today Research Institute for the North Korean Society 12th issue Good Friends: Centre for Peace, Human Rights and Refugees 1585-16 Seocho 3dong, Seochogu, Seoul, Korea 137-875 | Ph:+82 2 587 0662 | email: [email protected] Featured Article Hoeryung, Ten Days Worth of Food The December rations were provided from the Distribution are sold in December South Korean aid, and this was told at the official In Hoeryung, the provincial governement of food distributor (shop). Since there were North Hamkyung made a public announcement insufficient amount of rice to be distributed, some through a lecture on the new Public who have food coupons could not buy any rations. Distribution(PDS) system will emerge from 16th It could be seen as the state is trying to of December 2005 to the end of December. The monopolise the rice market – although this is not same was promised in November, but the actual a common situation throughout the country, since distribution did not take place. End of at Hamheung in the North Hamgyung province December 2005, however, 10days worth of rice did not control the black market, but proceed with was distributed for people who have brought the the PDS(Publc Distribution System). ration tickets. Hamheung, in October and November last year, After the Economic Management Improvement the PDS resumed as per normal and grains (rice Measures Policy in July 2002, the government and maize) were all threshed and in normal ration. was planning to provide rice at government This is a comparable change from distributing price(44won ed.), but this time the rice is unthreshed grains while the PDS was suspended.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–111] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE HEARING HELD MARCH 6, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–437 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio, Chairman TRENT FRANKS, Arizona LORETTA SANCHEZ, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island MO BROOKS, Alabama RICK LARSEN, Washington MAC THORNBERRY, Texas MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia TIM MORRISON, Professional Staff Member LEONOR TOMERO, Professional Staff Member AARON FALK, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Tuesday, March 6, 2012, Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for Missile Defense ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 .......................................................................................... 33 TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2012 FISCAL YEAR 2013 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FOR MISSILE DEFENSE STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Sanchez, Hon. Loretta, a Representative from California, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea Today” Describing the Way the North Korean People Live As Accurately As Possible
    RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NORTH KOREAN SOCIETY http://www.goodfriends.or.kr/[email protected] Weekly Newsletter No.374 Priority Release November 2010 [“Good Friends” aims to help the North Korean people from a humanistic point of view and publishes “North Korea Today” describing the way the North Korean people live as accurately as possible. We at Good Friends also hope to be a bridge between the North Korean people and the world.] ___________________________________________________________________________ Central Party Orders to Stop Collecting Rice for Military Provision Sound of Hailing at Farms at the News of No More Collection of Rice for Military Provision “Finally They Think of People” Meat Support Obligation to the Military Also Lifted “At least now we can fill our bellies with potatoes.” ___________________________________________________________________________ Central Party Orders to Stop Collecting Rice for Military Provision Every year when the harvest season approaches there were big conflicts at each regional farm between the military which tries to secure rice for military provision and farmers who refuse to hand over the rice they grew for the past one year. The conflicts are especially severe this year as the yields of harvest decrease because of the cold weather in the spring and the flood in the summer. In the case of North Hamgyong province it was reported that the level of discontent among farmers was serious enough to make the authorities worry. As the damage from flooding was so severe in the granary regions of North and South Hwanghae Provinces and North Pyongan Province it was decided that North Hamgyong Province was to provide rice for military provision first since it had better harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You, Father Kim Il Sung” Is the First Phrase North Korean Parents Are Instructed to Teach to Their Children
    “THANK YOU FATHER KIM ILLL SUNG”:”:”: Eyewitness Accounts of Severe Violations of Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion in North Korea PPPREPARED BYYY: DAVID HAWK Cover Photo by CNN NOVEMBER 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Michael Cromartie Chair Felice D. Gaer Vice Chair Nina Shea Vice Chair Preeta D. Bansal Archbishop Charles J. Chaput Khaled Abou El Fadl Dr. Richard D. Land Dr. Elizabeth H. Prodromou Bishop Ricardo Ramirez Ambassador John V. Hanford, III, ex officio Joseph R. Crapa Executive Diretor NORTH KOREA STUDY TEAM David Hawk Author and Lead Researcher Jae Chun Won Research Manager Byoung Lo (Philo) Kim Research Advisor United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Staff Tad Stahnke, Deputy Director for Policy David Dettoni, Deputy Director for Outreach Anne Johnson, Director of Communications Christy Klaasen, Director of Government Affairs Carmelita Hines, Director of Administration Patricia Carley, Associate Director for Policy Mark Hetfield, Director, International Refugee Issues Eileen Sullivan, Deputy Director for Communications Dwight Bashir, Senior Policy Analyst Robert C. Blitt, Legal Policy Analyst Catherine Cosman, Senior Policy Analyst Deborah DuCre, Receptionist Scott Flipse, Senior Policy Analyst Mindy Larmore, Policy Analyst Jacquelin Mitchell, Executive Assistant Tina Ramirez, Research Assistant Allison Salyer, Government Affairs Assistant Stephen R. Snow, Senior Policy Analyst Acknowledgements The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom expresses its deep gratitude to the former North Koreans now residing in South Korea who took the time to relay to the Commission their perspectives on the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and their experiences in North Korea prior to fleeing to China.
    [Show full text]
  • Shemyaafr,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIONREPORT
    EM0-1096 VOL 1 ShemyaAFR,Alaska 1992IRPFIELD INVESTIGATIOREPN ORT Volume 1 of 4 TECHNICAL .., FINAL February1993 preparedfor U.S.Air Force IO ElmendorfAFB,Alaska 11th AirControlWing 1lth CivilEngineeringOperationsSquadron UnderContractDEU-91-06 Preparedby CH2MHILL RC.Box8748 Boise,Idaho83707 For EnvironmentalManagementOperations Undera RelatedServicesAgreement withtheU.S.Departmentof Energy EnvironmentalManagementOperations Richland,Washington99352 j OtSTR|BUTIOPJ 0_:: ii-tIU L_OCuiviENT iL, ',..;;'-,_;;;.,.';,:{:1;" ,. FINAL I i i NOTICE i This report has been prepared for the United States Air Force by CH2M HILL for the purpose of aiding in the implementation of a final remedial action plan under the Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP). As the report relates to actual or possible releases of potentially hazardous substances, its release prior to an Air Force final decision on remedial action may be in the public's interest. The limited objectives of this report and the ongoing nature of the IRP, along with the evolving knowledge of site conditions and chemical effects on the environment and health, must be considered when evaluating this report, since subsequent facts may become known which may make this report premature or inaccurate. Acceptance of this report in performance of the contract under which it is prepared does not mean that the Air Force adopts the conclusions, recommendations or other views expressed herein, which are those of the contractor only and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the United States Air Force. Government agencies and their contractors registered with the Defense TechnicalInformationCenter (DTIC) should direct requestsfop copies of.this report to: Defense Technical InformationCenter (DTIC), Cameron Station,Alexandria, VA 22304-6145.
    [Show full text]
  • Amerykański System Obrony Antybalistycznej Oraz Faktyczne Źródła Rosyjskiego Sprzeciwu
    Amerykański system obrony antybalistycznej oraz faktyczne źródła rosyjskiego sprzeciwu Leszek Pawlikowicz1 Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Wydział Prawa Zakład Historii Prawa i Doktryn Polityczno-Prawnych Abstrakt: Amerykański program BMD jest formalnie postrzegany jako największe – obok rozszerzania NATO na Wschód – wyzwanie dla bezpieczeństwa Federacji Rosyj- skiej od chwili powstania państwa w końcu 1991 r. Jednak ze względu na mające miejsce w ciągu ostatniego ćwierćwiecza w Rosji zaniechania modernizacyjne (w odróż- nieniu od imponującego skoku technologicznego dokonanego w Chinach) – zwłaszcza w odniesieniu do sfery gospodarczej – faktycznie może on stanowić znacznie większe potencjalne wyzwanie dla rosyjskiej ekonomii, geopolityki i prestiżu niż dla jej zdolności obronnych. Stąd próba ambitnej odpowiedzi, polegającej na forsowaniu kosztownych programów zbrojeniowych, może być – paradoksalnie – taką samą pułapką, jak próba utrzymania parytetu w odpowiedzi na mityczny program SDI ze strony ZSRR. Wystar- czającą pod względem efektywności militarnej (efektu odstraszania), a przy tym rela- tywnie najtańszą ekonomicznie odpowiedzią jest utrzymywanie przez Rosję strategicz- nych sił jądrowych na obecnym pułapie ilościowym. W długofalowej perspektywie de- cydujące dla przyszłej pozycji oraz siły tego państwa, a także jego „atrakcyjności” i „siły 129 przyciągania” w przestrzeni międzynarodowej będzie znaczące podniesienie potencjału gospodarczego, zwłaszcza w sferze wysokich technologii oraz w branżach odpowie- dzialnych za zaspokojenie szeroko
    [Show full text]
  • SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies
    School of Oriental and African Studies University of London SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies No. 45 Producing Political Landscape on the Korean Peninsula: Divided Visions, United Vista Dr Robert Winstanley-Chesters & Ms Sherri L. Ter Molen May 2015 PRODUCING POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Producing Political Landscape on the Korean Peninsula: Divided Visions, United Vista Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters Beyond the Korean War Project (University of Cambridge) University of Leeds Ms. Sherri L. Ter Molen Wayne State University Author Note Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters is a Post-Doctoral Fellow of the Beyond the Korean War Project (University of Cambridge) and a Visiting Research Fellow at the School of Geography, University of Leeds. Sherri L. Ter Molen, A.B.D., is currently a Doctoral Candidate in the Department of Communication, Wayne State University. The research for this article and project has received generous support from the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2010-DZZ-3104). Correspondence this article should be addressed to Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters at [email protected]. 1 PRODUCING POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Abstract Myths of national construction and accompanying visual representations are often deeply connected to political narrative. The Korean peninsula may be unlike other political space due to the ruptured relations and sovereignty on its territory since World War II: North and South Korea. Nevertheless, both nations construct inverse ideologies with the common tools of the pen and lens and both produce highly coded,
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Strategy and Action Plan
    Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan DPRK ovata, Epimedium koreanum, Eleutherococcus Enticosus as medicinal; · Vitis amurensis, Actinidia argenta, Vaccinium uliginosum, Castanea crenata, Querecus sp._As nuts; · Spuriopinella calycina, Pteridium aquilinum, Osmunda japonica, Aralia elata, Platycodon grandifiorum as wild edible greens; · Trcholoma matsutake, 'Pleurotus ostreatus, P. cornucopiaen as mushroom resource; · Syringa dilatata, Thylgus quinque costatus, Agastache rugosa, Ledum palustre as spice plant. Endangered & rare species in Species inCITES Taxa DPRK Annexl Annex2 . Amphibian 9 Reptile 13 Aves 74 15 2 I Mammal 28 4 7 Total 124 19 28 As for forest wild animals with economic value, we can take Caprecolus caprecolus, Hydropotes inermis, Nemorhaedus goral, Sus scorfa, Lepus mandschuricus, Cervus nippon, Moschus moschiferus, Ursus thibetatnus, Meles meles, Nyctereutes procyonoides, Martes zibellina, Lutra lutra, Phsianus colchicus, Coturnix xoturnix, Tetrastes bonasia, Lyrurus tetrix. And in winter, ten thousands flocks of Anatidae fly along wetland at seaside of east and west seas. There distributed 185 species of fresh, brackish water and anadromous fishes including 65 species of Cyprinidae in freshwater. And are there 900 species of Disces and rich marine grasses and invertebrates with high industrial value such as Haliotis gigantea, Stichpus japonicus, Echinoidea, Erimaculus isenbeckii, Neptunus trituberculatus, Chionoecetes opilio in seawater of DPRK. In the KES, 329 species of Rhodophyta, 130 species of Rhaeophyta, 87 species of Chlorophta and in total 546 species of seaweeds are known. Among them, 309 species of seaweed have high economic values including 63 species with high medicinal value. 1.3 Threats to DPRK Biodiversity 1.3. L Threatened Status 1.3.1.1. Threatened status for ecosystem Destruction of ecosystems is being accelerated by natural disasters such as deforestation, soil erosion, deterioration of water quality, decrease of economic resources and also, flood.
    [Show full text]
  • LORAN-A Historic Context
    ' . Prepared by Alice Coneybeer U.S. Coast Guard, MLCP (se) Coast Guard Island, Bldg. 540 Alameda, CA 94501-5100 Phone 510.437.5804 Fax 510.437.5753 U.S. Coast Guard- Maintenance & Logistics Command Pacific • • • • • • • • • • LORAN-A Historic Context Alaska (District 17) September 1998 ENCLOSURE(2.} ( LORAN-A Context 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS .........•.....................................................•......................•........•..................................•. 1 2. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 2 3. IDSTORY OF LORAN-A STATIONS.............................................................................................................. 2 4. LORAN-A IN ALASKA. ..................................................................................................................................... 3 5. LORAN-A DURING THE COLD WAR IN ALASKA (1945-1989) ............................................................... 4 6. NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGffiiLITY EVALUATION .............................................................................. 4 6.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF TilE DEVELOPMENT OF AIDS TONAVIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE CONTEXT OF WORLD WAR II IN ALASKA .............. 5 6.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF LORAN-A WITIIIN TilE HISTORIC CONTEXT
    [Show full text]
  • PK2018-07-OCR.Pdf
    CONTENTS Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Inspecting Δ Emphasis on Effective Use of Natural Energy. ............18 Completed Koam-Tapchon Railway ................................1 Δ Sanatorium at the Foot of Mt Ryongak ........................20 Δ Supreme Leader’s Field Guidance at Construction Δ Moran Hill, People’s Cultural Recreation Area ............22 Site of Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area....................4 Δ Amateur Riders .............................................................26 Δ Effervescent DPRK-China Friendship .............................6 Δ 2018 Spring Table Tennis Tournament of Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Meeting the Disabled and Amateurs Held ..................................26 Chinese Foreign Minister ...............................................10 Δ Little Janggu Players ....................................................28 Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Meeting Δ Sinuiju Traffi c Safety Education US State Secretary. .........................................................11 Park for Children ..........................................................30 Δ Historic Fourth North-South Summit .............................12 Δ To Preserve National Soul and Flavour ........................32 Δ Gold Prizes Awarded to Δ Like Real Brothers and Sisters .....................................34 Kimilsungia and Kimjongilia.........................................14 Δ Laugh Heartily and Grow Up Happily .........................36 Δ Day of the Sun Celebrated Grandly ...............................15 Δ First Olympic Medallist
    [Show full text]
  • Dpr Korea 2019 Needs and Priorities
    DPR KOREA 2019 NEEDS AND PRIORITIES MARCH 2019 Credit: OCHA/Anthony Burke Democratic People’s Republic of Korea targeted beneficiaries by sector () Food Security Agriculture Health Nutrition WASH 327,000 97,000 CHINA Chongjin 120,000 North ! Hamgyong ! Hyeson 379,000 Ryanggang ! Kanggye 344,000 Jagang South Hamgyong ! Sinuiju 492,000 North Pyongan Hamhung ! South Pyongan 431,000 ! PYONGYANG Wonsan ! Nampo Nampo ! Kangwon North Hwanghae 123,000 274,000 South Hwanghae ! Haeju 559,000 REPUBLIC OF 548,000 KOREA PART I: TOTAL POPULATION PEOPLE IN NEED PEOPLE TARGETED 25M 10.9M 3.8M REQUIREMENTS (US$) # HUMANITARIAN PARTNERS 120M 12 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea targeted beneficiaries by sector () Food Security Agriculture Health Nutrition WASH 327,000 97,000 CHINA Chongjin 120,000 North ! Hamgyong ! Hyeson 379,000 Ryanggang ! Kanggye 344,000 Jagang South Hamgyong ! Sinuiju 492,000 North Pyongan Hamhung ! South Pyongan 431,000 ! PYONGYANG Wonsan ! Nampo Nampo ! Kangwon North Hwanghae 123,000 274,000 South Hwanghae ! Haeju 559,000 REPUBLIC OF 548,000 KOREA 1 PART I: TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: COUNTRY STRATEGY Foreword by the UN Resident Coordinator 03 Needs and priorities at a glance 04 Overview of the situation 05 2018 key achievements 12 Strategic objectives 14 Response strategy 15 Operational capacity 18 Humanitarian access and monitoring 20 Summary of needs, targets and requirements 23 PART II: NEEDS AND PRIORITIES BY SECTOR Food Security & Agriculture 25 Nutrition 26 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 27 Health 28 Guide to giving 29 PART III: ANNEXES Participating organizations & funding requirements 31 Activities by sector 32 People targeted by province 35 People targeted by sector 36 2 PART I: FOREWORD BY THE UN RESIDENT COORDINATOR FOREWORD BY THE UN RESIDENT COORDINATOR In the almost four years that I have been in DPR Korea Despite these challenges, I have also seen progress being made.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea's Biological Weapons Program
    Zhzh PROJECT ON MANAGING THE MICROBE North Korea’s Biological Weapons Program The Known and Unknown Hyun-Kyung Kim Elizabeth Philipp Hattie Chung REPORT OCTOBER 2017 Project on Managing the Microbe Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/Managing-Microbe Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: A satellite view of the Pyongyang Bio-Technical Institute, April 22, 2017. ©2016 Google Earth, CNES/Airbus. Used with Permission. Copyright 2017, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America PROJECT ON MANAGING THE MICROBE The Known and Unknown North Korea’s Biological Weapons Program Hyun-Kyung Kim Elizabeth Philipp Hattie Chung REPORT OCTOBER 2017 Acknowledgments We are grateful to our colleagues and mentors in the Belfer Center Project on Managing the Microbe for their support for this paper, particularly the former project directors Hon. Andrew C. Weber and Dr. Barry Bloom, research associate Maria Ben Assa, and visiting distinguished scholar Dr. Vernon Gibson. We would like to thank the experts who graciously participated in interviews for this study, including Dr. Bruce Bennett, Mr. Joseph Bermudez, Dr. Jim Collins, Ms. Melissa Hanham, Mr. Milton Leitenberg, Mr. Joshua Pollack, Dr. Pam Silver, and Dr. Wendin Smith. We would also like to extend our gratitude towards the AMPLYFI team who provided us with new insights into research methodology.
    [Show full text]