Magic, Women, and Heresy in the Late Empire: the Case of the Priscillianists

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Magic, Women, and Heresy in the Late Empire: the Case of the Priscillianists CHAPTER TWENTY -ONE MAGIC, WOMEN, AND HERESY IN THE LATE EMPIRE: THE CASE OF THE PRISCILLIANISTS Todd Breyfogle In the summer of 385, Priscillian, bishop of Avila, was executed in Trier by the imperial arm on charges of sorcery, nocturnal orgies, and praying naked. I The case of the Priscillianists is unusual on several counts. First, many of Priscillian's followers were wealthy aristocratic women. Second, Priscillian was an established and powerful bishop, whose road to execution was marked not by explicit accusations of magic but by allegations that he subscribed to Gnostic and Manichaean heresies. This essay looks anew at the Priscillianist affair in an effort to tease out the curious relation­ ships between magic, women, and heresy, and to ascertain what appeared magical to the fourth-century Christian mind. On the whole, modem scholarship has either not addressed the specific questions of magic or has treated magic as a legal device in the persecution of heresy.2 Heresy was not a capital crime, but magic was, prompting Gibbon's verdict that Priscillian was the first heretic to be executed by the state, 3 a judgment which has been frequently repeated. 4 More recent studies, however, have shown 1 I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. N. B. McLynn, who supervised my initial research on Priscillian, and to H. M D. Breyfogle, whose helpful sug~estions substantially improved the text. The topic of magic was all but neglected in the major studies by E.-Ch. Babut, Priscillien et le priscillienisme (Paris: H. Champion, 1909); J. Davids, De Orosio et Sancto Augustino Priscillianistarum Adversariis (The Hague: A. N. Govers, 1930); and A. d'Ah)s, Priscillien et I'Espagne Chretienne a Ia fin du !Ve siecle (Paris: G. Beauchesne, 1936). See B. Vollmann's summary of magic and astrology in Priscillianism in "Priscillianus," PWSup 14 (1974): 536-39. 3 Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (New York: Modem Library, n.d.), 1.973-75. 4 For example, W. H. C. Frend, The Rise of Christianity (Philadelphia: For­ tress, 1984), 670; P. Brown, "The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire," in Religion and Society in the Age of St. Augustine (New York: Harper and Row, 1972), 94; N. Q. King, The Emperor Theodosius and the Establish­ ment of Christianity (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1961), 51; and A. Piganiol, L 'empire chretien: 325-395, 2d ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1972), 228, 243-44. 436 CHAPTER TWENTY -ONE that the affair was not as simple as Gibbon suggests. It is now clear that Priscillian's teachings and practices, though often unusual, fell within the tolerated norms of ancient Christian orthodoxy.5 Thus, research has turned to sociological and anthropological theory for aid in explaining the accusations of magic and heresy which occa­ sioned Priscillian' s demise. 6 According to this latter approach, accusations of magic and Manichaeism functioned within a system of "community dynamics" as measures against those whom the community was unable to assimilate.7 The tools of anthropology have been a boon to historical re­ search. But in the case of the Priscillianists, at least, rigid applica­ tion of functionalist models has yielded two problems. First, it has led to the assumption that because the Priscillianists were accused of magic they must therefore have been marginal. Second, by focusing solely on conflicts of power, it has neglected the very real theological conflict, obscuring the Priscillianists' affinities with Manichaeism and Gnosticism. 8 That is to say, the functionalist approach has pre-empted the question of how Priscillianist prac­ tice and doctrine may actually have appeared magical and hereti­ cal to fourth-century observers. The accusations of heresy and magic against Priscillian cannot be fully accounted for as a conflict between "articulate" and "inarticulate" power.9 Priscillian was a well-educated urban aristo­ crat who with shrewd manipulation of the imperial power structure was able to frustrate his persecutor Ithacius at almost every tum.10 Priscillian was openly supported by at least five fellow bishops, and possibly counted as informal supporters such prominent ecclesias- S H. Chadwick, Priscil/ian of Avila: The Occult and the Charismatic in the Early Church (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), is a characteristically erudite and thorough account. I have not yet seen A. B. J. M Goosen, "Achtergronden van Priscillianus' Christelijke Ascese," (diss., Nijmegen, 1976). 6 Raymond Van Dam, Leadership and Community in Late Antique Gaul (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 88-114, brings modem anthro­ pological theory to bear on his detailed assemblage of the historical evidence. The classic, groundbreaking application of modem anthropology to late antiq­ uity is, of course, Peter Brown, "Sorcery, Demons and the Rise of Christianity: From Late Antiquity to the Middle Ages" in Religion and Society, 119-146. 1 Van Dam, Leadership, 78-87, 102-03. 8 For these affinities see below and Babut, Priscil/ien, 253-63; Davids, De Orosio, 117-20, 141-5; d'Allis, Priscil/ien, 92-93; Chadwick, Priscil/ian, 94- 99, 194-98. 9 The terms are P. Brown's, "Sorcery," 124. 10 Sulpicius Severns, Chron. 11.46.3, 11.48.5-6 (CSEL 1), with A. Piganiol, L 'empire chretien, 254. .
Recommended publications
  • Priscillian of Avila: Heretic Or Early Reformer? by Brian Wagner
    Priscillian of Avila: Heretic or Early Reformer? by Brian Wagner Introduction The Lord Jesus Christ said, “For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned” (Matthew 12:37).1 Though He was speaking of the last judgment, the principle of letting someone be judged, even in this life, by his own testimony is a sound one. The Bible also speaks of establishing one’s testimony in the mouth of two or three witnesses (1 Timothy 5:19), which is to be a safeguard against a false witness damaging someone’s reputation. History is a study of testimony. The primary source material written by an individual is often the best evidence by which to judge what that person believed and taught. Other contemporaries to that individual could also be used to evaluate whether he was presenting a consistent and coherent message at all times and whether his actions matched his words. As with all historical judgment of this kind, the testimony by friends or foes must be weighed with at least some suspicion of bias. Priscillian of Avila, from the fourth century, has been designated by most of history as a Christian heretic. This conclusion, made by many of his contemporary foes, led to his beheading by the civil authorities. After his death in A.D. 365, his writings were searched out for destruction, along with anyone promoting his teaching. Copies of some of his writings still survive. Very early ones, judged as possibly made within just a century of Priscillian’s martyrdom, were recovered at the University of Würzburg by Georg Schepss in 1885.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Marian Doctrine As
    INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, OHIO in affiliation with the PONTIFICAL THEOLOGICAL FACULTY MARIANUM ROME, ITALY By: Elizabeth Marie Farley The Development of Marian Doctrine as Reflected in the Commentaries on the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-5) by the Latin Fathers and Pastoral Theologians of the Church From the Fourth to the Seventeenth Century A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Sacred Theology with specialization in Marian Studies Director: Rev. Bertrand Buby, S.M. Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, OH 45469-1390 2013 i Copyright © 2013 by Elizabeth M. Farley All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Nihil obstat: François Rossier, S.M., STD Vidimus et approbamus: Bertrand A. Buby S.M., STD – Director François Rossier, S.M., STD – Examinator Johann G. Roten S.M., PhD, STD – Examinator Thomas A. Thompson S.M., PhD – Examinator Elio M. Peretto, O.S.M. – Revisor Aristide M. Serra, O.S.M. – Revisor Daytonesis (USA), ex aedibus International Marian Research Institute, et Romae, ex aedibus Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae Marianum, die 22 Augusti 2013. ii Dedication This Dissertation is Dedicated to: Father Bertrand Buby, S.M., The Faculty and Staff at The International Marian Research Institute, Father Jerome Young, O.S.B., Father Rory Pitstick, Joseph Sprug, Jerome Farley, my beloved husband, and All my family and friends iii Table of Contents Prėcis.................................................................................. xvii Guidelines........................................................................... xxiii Abbreviations...................................................................... xxv Chapter One: Purpose, Scope, Structure and Method 1.1 Introduction...................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1492 Reconsidered: Religious and Social Change in Fifteenth Century Ávila
    1492 RECONSIDERED: RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN FIFTEENTH CENTURY ÁVILA by Carolyn Salomons A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May 2014 © 2014 Carolyn Salomons All Rights Reserved Abstract This dissertation is an assessment of the impact of the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492 on the city of Ávila, in northwestern Castile. The expulsion was the culmination of a series of policies set forth by Isabel I of Castile and Ferdinand II of Aragon regarding Jewish-Christian relations. The monarchs invoked these policies in order to bolster the faith and religious praxis of Catholics in the kingdoms, especially those Catholics newly converted from Judaism. My work shows how the implementation of these strategies began to fracture the heretofore relatively convivial relations between the confessional groups residing in Ávila. A key component of the Crown’s policies was the creation of a Jewish quarter in the city, where previously, Jews had lived wherever they chose. This transformation of a previously shared civic place to one demarcated clearly by religious affiliation, i.e. the creation of both Jewish and Christian space, had a visceral impact on how Christians related to their former neighbors, and hostilities between the two communities increased in the closing decades of the fifteenth century. Yet at the same time, Jewish appeals to the Crown for assistance in the face of harassment and persecution were almost always answered positively, with the Crown intervening several times on behalf of their Jewish subjects. This seemingly incongruous attitude reveals a key component in the relationship between the Crown and Jews: the “royal alliance.” My work also details how invoking that alliance came at the expense of the horizontal alliances between Abulense Jews and Christians, and only fostered antagonism between the confessional groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia: a Study of Their Text and Language
    THE MONASTIC RULES OF VISIGOTHIC IBERIA: A STUDY OF THEIR TEXT AND LANGUAGE By NEIL ALLIES A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham July 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis is concerned with the monastic rules that were written in seventh century Iberia and the relationship that existed between them and their intended, contemporary, audience. It aims to investigate this relationship from three distinct, yet related, perspectives: physical, literary and philological. After establishing the historical and historiographical background of the texts, the thesis investigates firstly the presence of a monastic rule as a physical text and its role in a monastery and its relationship with issues of early medieval literacy. It then turns to look at the use of literary techniques and structures in the texts and their relationship with literary culture more generally at the time. Finally, the thesis turns to issues of the language that the monastic rules were written in and the relationship between the spoken and written registers not only of their authors, but also of their audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fathers of the Church ; V
    THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH A NEW TRANSLATION VOLUME 99 THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH A NEW TRANSLATION EDITORIAL BOARD Thomas P. Halton The Catholic University of America Editorial Director Elizabeth Clark Robert D. Sider Duke University Dickinson College Joseph T. Lienhard, S.J. Michael Slusser Fordham University Duquesne University Frank A.C. Mantello Cynthia White The Catholic University of America The University of Arizona Kathleen McVey Robin Darling Young Princeton Theological Seminary The Catholic University of America David J. McGonagle Director The Catholic University of America Press FORMER EDITORIAL DIRECTORS Ludwig Schopp, Roy J. Deferrari, Bernard M. Peebles, Hermigild Dressler, O.F.M. Cornelia Horn Staff Editor IBERIAN FATHERS volume 3 PACIAN OF BARCELONA OROSIUS OF BRAGA Translated by CRAIG L. HANSON Muskingum College New Concord, Ohio THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS Washington, D.C. Copyright © 1999 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standards for Information Science— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48–1984. ∞ library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Iberian fathers : Pacian of Barcelona and Orosius of Braga : [writings] / translated by Craig L. Hanson. p. cm. — (The fathers of the church ; v. 99) Includes bibliographical references and Indexes. ISBN 0-8132- 0099-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology—Early works to 1800. 2. Apologetics—Early
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official
    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
    [Show full text]
  • EVANGELICAL DICTIONARY of THEOLOGY
    EVANGELICAL DICTIONARY of THEOLOGY THIRD EDITION Edited by DANIEL J. TREIER and WALTER A. ELWELL K Daniel J. Treier and Walter A. Elwell, eds., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 1984, 2001, 2017. Used by permission. _Treier_EvangelicalDicTheo_book.indb 3 8/17/17 2:57 PM 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 3rd edition General Editors: Daniel J. Treier and Walter A. Elwell Advisory Editors: D. Jeffrey Bingham, Cheryl Bridges Johns, John G. Stackhouse Jr., Tite Tiénou, and Kevin J. Vanhoozer © 1984, 2001, 2017 by Baker Publishing Group Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516–6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Treier, Daniel J., 1972– editor. | Elwell, Walter A., editor. Title: Evangelical dictionary of theology / edited by Daniel J. Treier, Walter A. Elwell. Description: Third edition. | Grand Rapids, MI : Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, 2017. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027228 | ISBN 9780801039461 (cloth : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Theology—Dictionaries. Classification: LCC BR95 .E87 2017 | DDC 230/.0462403—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027228 Unless otherwise labeled, Scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version®.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gnosticism' in Fourth-Century Britain: the Frampton Mosaics Reconsidered Author(S): Dominic Perring Reviewed Work(S): Source: Britannia, Vol
    'Gnosticism' in Fourth-Century Britain: The Frampton Mosaics Reconsidered Author(s): Dominic Perring Reviewed work(s): Source: Britannia, Vol. 34 (2003), pp. 97-127 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3558541 . Accessed: 28/11/2012 11:38 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Britannia. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.82.215 on Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:38:52 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 'Gnosticism' in Fourth-CenturyBritain: the Frampton Mosaics Reconsidered By DOMINIC PERRING INTRODUCTION years have seen a renewed interest in the significance of the mosaic designs Recentemployed in Roman houses.1 Studies have concentrated on establishing the mythological sources of the images chosen, and on describing the social and architectural contexts within which such art was used.2 It has long been noted that some of the subjects preferred in fourth-century
    [Show full text]
  • Apostolic Church History
    APOSTOLIC CHURCH HISTORY I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matthew 16:18). Christ is the head of the church: and he is the Savior of the body (Ephesians 5:23). It would be good to review the list of those attending the first church service ever recorded. In the book of Acts we see that people were there from every nation. The Lord planned this special meeting so His Word could be taken back to every nation. Most Christians are only familiar with other Church services as recorded in the Bible. Undoubtedly church services were being held at many other places that we have no Biblical record of. There are many records available for large Acts 2 Christian Organizations throughout every century. It has always been hard for me to believe that the Lord died only for the first century and the last century. The gates of hell has never prevailed against His church. "....devoted men out of every nation under heaven." Acts 2:5 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God (Acts 2:9-11). Think of the eyewitness story they had to tell when they went back home. Has this important passage slipped by without analyzing the potential explosive evangelistic tool that the Lord set in motion? In this study I want to address the following question.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies
    An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies Edited by Orlando O. Espín and James B. Nickoloff A Michael Glazier Book LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org A Michael Glazier Book published by Liturgical Press. Cover design by David Manahan, o.s.b. Cover symbol by Frank Kacmarcik, obl.s.b. © 2007 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, microfiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or by any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, P.O. Box 7500, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data An introductory dictionary of theology and religious studies / edited by Orlando O. Espín and James B. Nickoloff. p. cm. “A Michael Glazier book.” ISBN-13: 978-0-8146-5856-7 (alk. paper) 1. Religion—Dictionaries. 2. Religions—Dictionaries. I. Espín, Orlando O. II. Nickoloff, James B. BL31.I68 2007 200.3—dc22 2007030890 We dedicate this dictionary to Ricardo and Robert, for their constant support over many years. Contents List of Entries ix Introduction and Acknowledgments xxxi Entries 1 Contributors 1519 vii List of Entries AARON “AD LIMINA” VISITS ALBIGENSIANS ABBA ADONAI ALBRIGHT, WILLIAM FOXWELL ABBASIDS ADOPTIONISM
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in Python, Joseph Fontenrose Suggested an Approach to A
    1 INTRODUCTION In Python, Joseph Fontenrose suggested an approach to a reading of Beowulf which had many promising insights and one apparently insurmountable difficulty. The insights were the consequence of his contention that the Anglo-Saxon poem developed from the "combat myth" - the story of battle between god or hero against chthonic being which he had traced in Delphic and Indo-European myth,. The difficulty was that this view ran counter to the widely-held position which maintains that Anglo-Saxon poetry was founded upon the principles of Christian exegesis; that Beowulf was either allegorical or typological, but in any case fundamentally Christian . There was simply no way in which the views of Fontenrose, which proposed an essentially mythical interpretation of the poem based upon pagan cosmology, could co-exist with the allegorical, thoroughly Christian view. 1. see Python, Appendix 5, pp. 521ff. Throughout this study, I have taken a functional view of myth, although reference will be made to other theories. My view is best summarised by the following statement from Ian G. Barbours Myths, Models and Paradigms: "(Myths) are a cohesive force binding a community together and contributing to social solidarity, group identity and communal harmony. They encourage cultural stability...Myth sanctions the existing social order and justifies its status system and power structure, providing a rationale for social and political institutions - from kinship to kingship. A common morality is supported by a mythical tradition, which perpetuates both value attitudes and specific behavioural recommendations." pp. 23-24. 2 However, Python remained eminently plausible. One of the outcomes of the tension between the two approaches to the poem was the necessity to examine both in detail; the principal consequence of this examination was a growing disquiet with some of the key assumptions made by the allegorical school of criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Heresies
    Glossary of Heresies For the convenience of the reader, many of the (alleged) heresies discussed in this volume arc listed here by name of heresy or group of hcreticsJollowed by infimnation about the hcresiarch (founder) or chief representatives, summary of doctrine, and cross-references to related heresies. Since there has always been much debate about the exact meaning of each heresy, this listing cannot claim to be complete or authoritative. The reader may find discussions of these here­ sics in this volume by using the index. Albigenses (Albigensians)-named after town of Albi in southwest France. Antisacerdotal (denies powers of the clergy), ascetic theology first appeared in 1012-1020 in Limousin. Condemned by Council of Toulouse in 1119. Albigensian Crusade against them in thirteenth cen­ tury; crushed by Inquisition in fourteenth century. Also called Cathars, and probably influenced by Bogomils and Manichaeans. Anabaptists-Name for numerous groups that opposed infant baptism, also known as Baptists. Anti-trinitarianisrn-Theology that contests the official Church doc­ trine concerning the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost). Arians and Socinians were anti-trinitarian because they denied the equality of Fa­ ther and Son. Apollinarianisrn-Apollinarius the Younger, bishop ofLaodicea (c.310- c.390). Denied the existence in Christ of a rational human soul, in order to combat Arianism. Arianisrn-Arius, priest of Alexandria (c. 250-336). Emphasized the cre­ ated, human nature of Christ, to be distinguished from divine nature of God, and thus God and his Son cannot be one. Condemned at Coun­ cil ofNicaea (325 A.D.). See Anti-trinitarianism. Bogornils-Bogomil, Balkan priest (tenth century A.D.).
    [Show full text]