DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Player Event Instructions(8.2.1, 8.1.3)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Player Event Instructions(8.2.1, 8.1.3) Non-Player Event Instructions (8.2.1, 8.1.3) = Priority play ( = with Instructions) = Special Instructions = Do not play # Title Scotti Saxons Civitates Dux Play shaded. Remove fewest Comitates then 1 Arthur Play only if removing pieces. Play only if removing pieces. fewest—unless Fragmentation, in which case most—Cavalry able. Play shaded and only if Dux player at 2 Alans Fragmentation. Play if Imperium Phase now would cause Play if not Fragmentation to add most 3 Pelagius Fragmentation; add most cubes able. cubes able. Play only if Dux Non-player, if 4th or Play only if 4th or earlier Event card of this 4 Stilicho earlier Event card of this Epoch (2.4), and Epoch (2.4) and to place 5+ Cavalry from to place 5+ Cavalry from o map only. o map only. 5 Imperial Subsidies Play shaded. Play shaded. If Fragmentation, remove 6 Uther most Cavalry able; if not, least. Transfer Wealth before Resources. 7 Cair Legion Do not play if later than 4th Event card of 8 Classis Britannica this Epoch (2.4). March only to enemy in Home terrain March only to enemy in Home terrain 9 Swift Chargers (within that, per March priorities, 8.7.3). (within that, per March priorities, 8.8.6). Play only if at least 2 Foederati Warbands Play only if at least 4 Foederati Warbands 10 Annona are on the map. are on the map. Play only if at least 2 Warbands would be 11 Barbarian Alliance marked. 12 Romanitas Play only if no loss in total Briton Play shaded and only if Ordovices is not 13 Cunedda Controlled Population. under Friendly Control. Play if 1st or 2nd Event card of this Epoch Do not play if later than 4th Event card of 14 Aneirin (2.4) and 6+ Scotti Warbands on map. this Epoch (2.4). Play if Dux above victory threshold and not Play if Dux above victory threshold and not Play if Imperium Phase now would cause Play only if not Fragmentation. Add 15 Fickle Weather Fragmentation, only where enemy Control. Fragmentation, only where enemy Control. Fragmentation; add rst at Briton Control. Prosperity where most Dux pieces. Do not play if Fragmentation or later than Do not play if Fragmentation or later than 16 Dux Bellorum 4th Event card of this Epoch (2.4). 4th Event card of this Epoch (2.4). 17 Recruits Play only to add Briton Control. Play only if Scotti Non-player and not in 18 e Irish Shore nal Epoch (2.4). Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 19 Surrey Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 20 ames Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. Do not play if next Epoch Round will be Do not play if next Epoch Round will be Play only if Civitates Non-player and 21 Camelot nal. nal. Roman Rule. Battle enemy Troops where most are unable Battle enemy Troops where most are unable 22 Ambrosius Aurelianus to Withdraw. to Withdraw. Play only if at Civilian Dominance. Battle with Reinforce for most possible 23 St Germanus added Briton Control then Plunder. 24 Migrants 25 Sea Trade Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 26 Deira shaded to remove more enemy than Scotti. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 27 Gratia Pay Upkeep if Briton Resources >25. Do not play in nal Epoch (2.4) or if Do not play in nal Epoch (2.4) or if Play only if Civitates Non-player and 28 Mons Badonicus C showing as next card. C showing as next card. Roman Rule. Battle only if possible to remove Cavalry, Battle only if possible to remove Cavalry, Place Town to add most Briton Control Do not play if Civitates player or 29 Corinium more enemy units, or Stronghold. more enemy units, or Stronghold. possible. Fragmentation. Play only if 3+ Cavalry o map and Dux 30 Groans of the Britons not above victory threshold. Play unshaded and only if Saxon player has Play unshaded and only if Scotti player has 31 Waelcyrge above 20 Renown. above 30 Renown. Target Barbarian with most Renown. Target Barbarian with most Renown. 32 Tintagel With the Cross Do not play if later than 4th Event card of Do not play if Fragmentation. Do not play if Fragmentation. 33 this Epoch (2.4). Battle if non-Foederati Dux and Civitates Battle if non-Foederati Dux and Civitates on his Shoulders would ght together, otherwise March. would ght together, otherwise March. Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 34 Aquae Sulis Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. Play shaded and only if Civilian Dominance 35 De Excidio Britanniae Play only if Saxon player and Saxon or Saxon Control at 3+. Reduce most Saxon Control above 5. Controlled Population able. Play only if Scotti player and more than Play only if Scotti player and more than 36 St Patricius 1 Epoch card remains. 1 Epoch card remains. Do not play if C B has Do not play if C B has 37 Bryneich been played. been played. Play for Civitates to Battle by 8.7.1 priorities Play only to Intercept now by Dux 38 Rising Seas Play only if Saxon Non-player. or, if they cannot, for Dux to Intercept. Intercept priorities (8.8.1). Play only to remove blue Foederati and if Play only to remove red Foederati and if 39 Hengest Fragmentation or Civitates player above Dux player or Fragmentation. victory threshold or has Wealth > Prestige. Play only to remove more Briton than Play only to remove more Briton than Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 40 Gewisse Barbarian pieces. Barbarian pieces. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. Play only to Battle now wherever possible Play only to Battle now wherever possible March to and Battle at Stronghold of enemy March to and Battle at Stronghold of enemy 41 Feeding the Ravens to remove Stronghold (within that, per to remove Stronghold (within that, per most at victory, in its Home terrain if able most at victory, in its Home terrain if able 8.5.3). 8.6.4). (within that, per 8.7.3, 8.7.1). (within that, per 8.8.5, 8.8.3). Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 42 Anderida Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. Discard O to become 1st Eligible when Discard O to become 1st Eligible when Discard O to become 1st Eligible when Discard O to become 1st Eligible when 43 Omens 3rd or 4th among 3+ Eligible Factions and 3rd or 4th among 3+ Eligible Factions and 3rd or 4th among 3+ Eligible Factions and 3rd or 4th among 3+ Eligible Factions and not playing Pivotal. not playing Pivotal. not playing Pivotal. not playing Pivotal. Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 44 Lindsey Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 45 anet Play only if Saxon Non-player and not in 46 Dubglas River nal Epoch (2.4). Do not play if Civitates player or 47 Cerdic Fragmentation. Remove no red markers. Non-Player Event Instructions (continued) = Priority play ( = with Instructions) = Special Instructions = Do not play # Title Scotti Saxons Civitates Dux Play only to remove more Briton than Play unshaded to replace Fort, otherwise Play only to place full 3 Warbands and Play only to place full 3 Warbands and 48 Shades of Boudicca Barbarian pieces. shaded to remove more enemy than Saxon. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 1 Settlement where no Friendly Control. 49 Vortigern Play only if Saxon Non-player. Play only to add Briton Control. Play only if no Fort at Rutupiae. Play if Imperium Phase now would cause 50 Calleva Atrebatum Fragmentation; add rst at Briton Control. Do not play if Fragmentation. Do not play if Dux player or at 51 Isle of Avalon Fragmentation. Raid and Battle most enemy Troops unable Raid and Battle most enemy Troops unable Play only where Civitates Battle condition Play only where Dux Battle condition 52 Mistborn to Withdraw (within that, per 8.5.4). to Withdraw (within that, per 8.6.5). (8.7.1) would be met (after Muster). (8.8.3) would be met (after Train). Play only to aect player Control score at 53 Brittany Atrebates, Regni, or Cantiaci.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Origins of Lordship
    THE ANCIENT ORIGINS OF THE LORDSHIP OF BOWLAND Speculation on Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norse and Brythonic roots William Bowland The standard history of the lordship of Bowland begins with Domesday. Roger de Poitou, younger son of one of William the Conqueror’s closest associates, Roger de Montgomery, Earl of Shrewsbury, is recorded in 1086 as tenant-in-chief of the thirteen manors of Bowland: Gretlintone (Grindleton, then caput manor), Slatebourne (Slaidburn), Neutone (Newton), Bradeforde (West Bradford), Widitun (Waddington), Radun (Radholme), Bogeuurde (Barge Ford), Mitune (Great Mitton), Esingtune (Lower Easington), Sotelie (Sawley?), Hamereton (Hammerton), Badresbi (Battersby/Dunnow), Baschelf (Bashall Eaves). William Rufus It was from these holdings that the Forest and Liberty of Bowland emerged sometime after 1087. Further lands were granted to Poitou by William Rufus, either to reward him for his role in defeating the army of Scots king Malcolm III in 1091-2 or possibly as a consequence of the confiscation of lands from Robert de Mowbray, Earl of Northumbria in 1095. 1 As a result, by the first decade of the twelfth century, the Forest and Liberty of Bowland, along with the adjacent fee of Blackburnshire and holdings in Hornby and Amounderness, had been brought together to form the basis of what became known as the Honor of Clitheroe. Over the next two centuries, the lordship of Bowland followed the same descent as the Honor, ultimately reverting to the Crown in 1399. This account is one familiar to students of Bowland history. However, research into the pattern of land holdings prior to the Norman Conquest is now beginning to uncover origins for the lordship that predate Poitou’s lordship by many centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian' Archaeology of Cumbria
    Durham E-Theses A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. How to cite: O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. (1980) A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7869/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Deirdre M. O'Sullivan A reassessment of the Early Christian.' Archaeology of Cumbria ABSTRACT This thesis consists of a survey of events and materia culture in Cumbria for the period-between the withdrawal of Roman troops from Britain circa AD ^10, and the Viking settlement in Cumbria in the tenth century. An attempt has been made to view the archaeological data within the broad framework provided by environmental, historical and onomastic studies. Chapters 1-3 assess the current state of knowledge in these fields in Cumbria, and provide an introduction to the archaeological evidence, presented and discussed in Chapters ^--8, and set out in Appendices 5-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. How to cite: O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. (1980) A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7869/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Deirdre M. O'Sullivan A reassessment of the Early Christian.' Archaeology of Cumbria ABSTRACT This thesis consists of a survey of events and materia culture in Cumbria for the period-between the withdrawal of Roman troops from Britain circa AD ^10, and the Viking settlement in Cumbria in the tenth century. An attempt has been made to view the archaeological data within the broad framework provided by environmental, historical and onomastic studies. Chapters 1-3 assess the current state of knowledge in these fields in Cumbria, and provide an introduction to the archaeological evidence, presented and discussed in Chapters ^--8, and set out in Appendices 5-10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman and the Post-Roman South
    Chapter 2 The Mabinogi of Pwyll The Roman and the Post-Roman South The complex of the Indigenous Underworld, and its association with South Wales, was overlayed by the interaction of geography and history throughout the Roman and Post-Roman periods. Unlike the kingdoms of the North, Dyfed, Ystrad Twyi, Gwent, Brycheiniog, Glywissing and the other Southern Welsh kingdoms did not fall under the sway of the warrior dynasties of Coel Hen and the Votadinii (which are further discussed in Chapter 3) during the fifth and sixth century sub-Roman period. Instead, this part of Wales retained its traditional connections with Ireland on one hand, and the plains of England on the other. These are links which, as we have seen, had deep prehistoric roots, even as far back as the Early Stone Age (see p. 26, n. 34, p. 157 n. 218 above). But even into the historic period, the respective experiences of North and South Wales tended to reinforce rather than submerge their cultural differences, as we will now consider. In the first century AD, following a brief but intense period of resistance during the Claudian conquest, the Silures of what is now the south-eastern corner of Wales submitted wholeheartedly to the Roman yoke. The rich, lowland landscape of this area made it conducive to the Roman way of life. The civitas or tribal district of the Silurian people supported a thriving villa economy – as well as a number of fully-developed urban centres at Nidum (Neath), Isca (Caerleon), Gobannium (Abergevenny) and Venta Silurum (Caerwent). It was this latter location, literally meaning ‘Marketplace (venta) of the Silures’ which was to bequeath its name to the later sub-Roman kingdom of Gwent.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Age Isles Summary
    Dark Age Isles Summary By Matt Schwoebel Dark Age Isles: Rome, Arthur, and the New West (337-686 A.D.) is a heuristic, generational, geographic history of the Dark Age period in the Isles – Britain (England, Scotland, & Wales), Ireland, and Brittany (Armorica) including adjacent areas of Gaul/Francia. Contents: I. Introduction to Dark Age Isles Myth and Reality Page 2 II. Seven Cultural-Historical Phases Page 4 III. Generation Timeline Page 7 1 © Matt Schwoebel I. Introduction to Dark Age Isles Myth and Reality The period and place covered by this book represent one of the least enlightened by surviving written records from the Dark Ages. Between 337 A.D. and 686 A.D, the reasonably integrated Roman province of Britannia became an early form of England (or Angleland) divided into multiple kingdoms. The imperial language of Latin (in its vulgar form) was no longer spoken. Unusually in former western imperial lands a native language, Brythonic Celtic (Welsh), AND a conqueror language, Anglo-Saxon (English), arose to replace Latin. This linguistic situation is unique with Basque (Euskara) being the only other pre-Roman native survivor. Elsewhere a Latin dialect prevailed or a Germanic or Slavic conqueror language replaced it. There are eight myths listed below that will be addressed by this book. It will describe seven main cultural-historical phases between the death of Emperor Constantine the Great in 337 A.D. and the death of the last Pagan Saes king in 686 A.D. (along with the great Pict victory the year before). The main portion of the book will describe the changing situation in Britannia (England & Wales), Hibernia (Ireland), Caledonia (Pictland/Scotland), and an extended Armorica (Brittany) generation by generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Aneurin
    The Aneurin Great War Project: Timeline Part 1 - (Ape)men at War, Prehistory to 730 Copyright Notice: This material was written and published in Wales by Derek J. Smith (Chartered Engineer). It forms part of a multifile e-learning resource, and subject only to acknowledging Derek J. Smith's rights under international copyright law to be identified as author may be freely downloaded and printed off in single complete copies solely for the purposes of private study and/or review. Commercial exploitation rights are reserved. The remote hyperlinks have been selected for the academic appropriacy of their contents; they were free of offensive and litigious content when selected, and will be periodically checked to have remained so. Copyright © 2013-2021, Derek J. Smith. First published 09:00 BST 30th May 2013. This version 09:00 GMT 20th January 2021 [BUT UNDER CONSTANT EXTENSION AND CORRECTION, SO CHECK AGAIN SOON] This timeline supports the Aneurin series of interdisciplinary scientific reflections on why the Great War failed so singularly in its bid to be The War to End all Wars. It presents actual or best-guess historical event and introduces theoretical issues of cognitive science as they become relevant. UPWARD Author's Home Page Project Aneurin, Scope and Aims Master References List FORWARD IN TIME Part 1 - (Ape)men at War, Prehistory to 730 Part 2 - Royal Wars (Without Gunpowder), 731 to 1272 Part 3 - Royal Wars (With Gunpowder), 1273-1602 Part 4 - The Religious Civil Wars, 1603-1661 Part 5 - Imperial Wars, 1662-1763 Part 6 - The Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • A Welsh Classical Dictionary
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY GADEON ap CYNAN. See Gadeon ab Eudaf Hen. GADEON ab EUDAF HEN. (330) Gadeon is probably the correct form of the name which appears in the tale of ‘The Dream of Macsen Wledig’ as Adeon ab Eudaf, brother of Cynan ab Eudaf. According to the tale, Adeon and Cynan followed Macsen to the continent and captured Rome for him. After that Macsen gave them permission to conquer lands for themselves, (see s.n. Cynan ab Eudaf), but Adeon returned to his own country (WM 187, 189-191, RM 88, 90-92). According to Jesus College MS.20 the wife of Coel Hen was the daughter of Gadeon ab Eudaf Hen (JC 7 in EWGT p.45), and this is probably correct although later versions make her the daughter of Gadeon (variously spelt) ap Cynan ab Eudaf, and she is given the name Ystradwel (variously spelt) (ByA §27a in EWGT p.90). Also in the various versions of the ancestry of Custennin ap Cynfor and Amlawdd Wledig we find Gadeon (variously spelt) ap Cynan ab Eudaf (JC 11, ByA §30b, 31, ByS §76 in EWGT pp.45, 93, 94, 65). Similarly in MG §5 in EWGT p.39, but Eudaf is misplaced. The various spellings show that the name was unfamiliar: Gadean, Gadvan, Gadiawn, Kadeaun, Cadvan, Kadien, Kadiawn. See EWGT passim. It seems probable that Gadeon ab Cynan is an error for Gadeon ab Eudaf, rather than to suppose two such persons (PCB). GAFRAN ab AEDDAN. He appears in Bonedd Gwŷr y Gogledd (§11 in EWGT p.73) as Gafran ab Aeddan Fradog ap Dyfnwal Hen.
    [Show full text]
  • Was King Arthur a Living Hero Or a Popular Legend?
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Honors Senior Theses/Projects Student Scholarship 6-1-2015 Legendary: Was King Arthur a Living Hero or a Popular Legend? Emily Walley Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/honors_theses Part of the Medieval History Commons Recommended Citation Walley, Emily, "Legendary: Was King Arthur a Living Hero or a Popular Legend?" (2015). Honors Senior Theses/Projects. 84. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/honors_theses/84 This Undergraduate Honors Thesis/Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Senior Theses/Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 1 Legendary: Was King Arthur a Living Hero or a Popular Legend? By Emily J. Walley An Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation from the Western Oregon University Honors Program Dr. Elizabeth Swedo, Thesis Advisor Dr. Gavin Keulks, Honors Program Director Western Oregon University June 2015 2 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Introduction 5 The Legend 6 Literature Review 7 Textual Sources Concerning Arthur 23 Camlann: the Last Battle 37 The Debate of the Gaulish Campaign 47 Arthur’s Growing Fame 49 12 Battles: the Arthurian Campaign 56 Badon: the Introduction of Arthur 59 Tintagel: the Birth of a Legend 61 Solving the Matter of Britain 63 Conclusion 72 Bibliography 74 3 Abstract Despite being a well-known figure in Western culture, the historical evidence for King Arthur is very small, and scholars have not even been able to identify a specific person as the historical Arthur.
    [Show full text]
  • OBINUS, Fictitious Archbishop of London. He Appears Fourth in a List Attributed to Jocelin of Furness, Succeeding Cadar and Succ
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY OBINUS, fictitious archbishop of London. He appears fourth in a list attributed to Jocelin of Furness, succeeding Cadar and succeeded by Conan (John Stow, The Chronicles of England, 1580, p.56). OCTAVIUS, Duke of the Gewissei. See Eudaf Hen. ODGAR ab AEDD. (Legendary). Odgar ab Aedd, king of Ireland, appears in the tale of ‘Culhwch and Olwen’. He accompanied Arthur to the west of Ireland in the search for Gwrgi Seferi, the purpose of which is never explained (RM 134). Later Arthur dispatched a message to Odgar to seek the cauldron of Diwrnach Wyddel, his overseer. Odgar, king of Ireland, besought Diwrnach to give it, but he would not (RM 135). Odgar was the only person who could pluck from the head of Ysgithyrwyn, Chief Boar, the tusk which Ysbaddaden Pencawr required in order to shave himself for the wedding of Culhwch and Olwen (WM 452, RM 122). However it was actually ‘Cadw’ [Caw] of Prydyn who ‘took’ the tusk (RM 135). Odgar was brother of Gwitard, son of Aedd king of Ireland. On the name see Patrick Sims-Williams in BBCS 29 pp.605-6 (1982). ODIAR the Frank. (Legendary). He is mentioned as Odyar franc in the romance of ‘Geraint and Enid’ as the steward of Arthur's Court (WM 412, RM 265). See further CO(2) p.227. ODWYN ap TEITHWALCH. (1040) He is mentioned in the genealogies as a descendant of Ceredig ap Cunedda, and the father of Morfydd the mother of Gwaithfoed of Ceredigion (PP §45). Here the spelling is Odwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Teyrnas Gwynedd
    Teyrnas Gwynedd Hanes Cymru Mae'r erthygl hon yn rhan o gyfres Cyfnodau Cynhanes Cyfnod y Rhufeiniaid Oes y Seintiau Yr Oesoedd Tywyll Yr Oesoedd Canol Yr Oesoedd Canol Cynnar Oes y Tywysogion Yr Oesoedd Canol Diweddar Cyfnod y Tuduriaid 17eg ganrif 18fed ganrif 19eg ganrif 20fed ganrif Y Rhyfel Byd Cyntaf Y cyfnod rhwng y rhyfeloedd Yr Ail Ryfel Byd 21ain ganrif Teyrnasoedd Deheubarth Gwynedd Morgannwg Powys Yn ôl pwnc Hanes crefyddol Hanes cyfansoddiadol Hanes cyfreithiol Hanes cymdeithasol Hanes demograffig Hanes economaidd Hanes gwleidyddol Hanes LHDT Hanes milwrol Hanes morwrol Hanes tiriogaethol Hanesyddiaeth v · t · e (https://cy.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nodyn:Hanes_Cymru&action=edit) Mae'r erthygl hon am y deyrnas hanesyddol Gwynedd. Am y sir fodern gweler Gwynedd. Gweler hefyd Gwynedd (gwahaniaethu) Roedd Teyrnas Gwynedd yn un o brif deyrnasoedd Cymru yn yr Oesoedd Canol. Roedd ei ffiniau yn amrywio, yn dibynnu ar Adnoddau Dysgu ba mor nerthol oedd y brenin neu'r tywysog, ond roedd wastad Rhestr o adnoddau dysgu ar gyfer y yn cynnwys Arfon, Eryri, ac Ynys Môn. Yn draddodiadol roedd pwnc yma Gwynedd yn cael ei rhannu'n ddau ranbarth: "Gwynedd Uwch Conwy" a "Gwynedd Is Conwy", gydag Afon Conwy yn ffin Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru rhwng y ddwy ran. Oes y Tywysogion (https://www.llyfrg ell.cymru/gwasanaethau/addysg/adn Yn ôl Historia Brittonium (‘Hanes y Brythoniaid’, 9fed ganrif) oddau-dysgu/oes-y-tywysogion) roedd Cunedda Wledig[1] a'i feibion wedi dod i lawr i ogledd- orllewin Cymru o'r Hen Ogledd, sef rhan ddeheuol yr Alban yn Braslun o Gymru, 1063-1282 (http awr, er mwyn erlid y Gwyddelod o Wynedd, gan sefydlu teyrnas [2] s://view.officeapps.live.com/op/vie Gwynedd yn sgil hynny.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAYBOOK COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety
    The Fall of Roman Britain PLAYBOOK COIN Series, Volume VIII by Marc Gouyon-Rety T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Multiplayer Example of Play . 2 Designer Notes. 64 Non-Players Orientation. 16 Non-Player Design Notes . 65 Victory Descriptions . 27 Sources . 66 The Pendragon Chronicles . 28 Gazetteer . 68 Event Notes . 42 Pronunciation Guide . 70 © 2017 GMT Games LLC • P .O . Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232 • www .GMTGames .com 2 Pendragon ~ Playbook Multiplayer Example of Play or Renown (for Barbarians) that each Faction has (1.8). Go ahead and “They, moved, as far as was possible for human nature, put a cylinder in each Faction’s color on the Edge Track at the numbers by the tale of such a tragedy, make speed, like the flight indicated: Dux is red, Scotti green, Saxon black, Civitates blue (1 .5) . of eagles, unexpected in quick movements of cavalry on The remaining four cylinders are for Eligibility (2 .2) . They always land and of mariners by sea; before long they plunge their start the game in the Eligible box on the Sequence of Play track—put terrible swords in the necks of the enemies; the massacre them there . they inflict is to be compared to the fall of leaves at the Put the blue pawn along the Edge Track between 36 and 37 and fixed time, just like a mountain torrent, swollen by numer- the red pawn between 75 and 76 . The pawns mark current victory ous streams after storms, sweeps over its bed in its noisy conditions for the Civitates and Dux Factions, respectively, which course; […]” may change over time as the Roman Imperium deteriorates (6.8, Gildas (De Excidio Britanniae, Part I.17) 7 .2) .
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of CELTIC MYTHOLOGY and FOLKLORE
    the encyclopedia of CELTIC MYTHOLOGY AND FOLKLORE Patricia Monaghan The Encyclopedia of Celtic Mythology and Folklore Copyright © 2004 by Patricia Monaghan All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Monaghan, Patricia. The encyclopedia of Celtic mythology and folklore / Patricia Monaghan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8160-4524-0 (alk. paper) 1. Mythology, Celtic—Encyclopedias. 2. Celts—Folklore—Encyclopedias. 3. Legends—Europe—Encyclopedias. I. Title. BL900.M66 2003 299'.16—dc21 2003044944 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions, or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com Text design by Erika K. Arroyo Cover design by Cathy Rincon Printed in the United States of America VB Hermitage 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION iv A TO Z ENTRIES 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY 479 INDEX 486 INTRODUCTION 6 Who Were the Celts? tribal names, used by other Europeans as a The terms Celt and Celtic seem familiar today— generic term for the whole people.
    [Show full text]