UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1 22 March 2006 ENGLISH / FRENCH / SPANISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty-second session Agenda item 17 (b) of the provisional agenda PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Hina Jilani Addendum Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received* ______________ * The present document is being circulated as received, in the languages of submission only, as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.06-11958 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1 Page 2 Contents Paragraphs Pages Introduction........................................................................................ 1 – 5 5 Afghanistan ....................................................................................... 6 – 7 5 Algeria................................................................................................ 8 – 15 6 Argentina............................................................................................16 – 19 10 Australia............................................................................................. 20 – 21 11 Azerbaijan .......................................................................................... 22 – 24 12 Bahrain............................................................................................... 25 – 30 13 Bangladesh......................................................................................... 31 – 42 18 Belarus ............................................................................................... 43 – 54 23 Bolivia................................................................................................ 55 – 59 27 Brazil.................................................................................................. 60 – 68 29 Cambodia ........................................................................................... 69 – 71 33 Cameroon........................................................................................... 72 – 73 34 Chad ................................................................................................... 74 – 75 35 Chile .................................................................................................. 76 – 78 36 China (People’s Republic of)............................................................. 79 – 105 37 Colombia ........................................................................................... 106 – 139 47 Côte d’Ivoire ...................................................................................... 140 – 144 63 Cuba ................................................................................................... 145 – 154 64 Democratic Republic of the Congo.................................................... 155 – 171 69 Dominican Republic .......................................................................... 172 – 173 80 Ecuador .............................................................................................. 174 – 180 81 Egypt .................................................................................................. 181 – 186 84 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1 Page 3 El Salvador......................................................................................... 187 – 189 86 Eritrea................................................................................................. 190 – 191 87 Ethiopia .............................................................................................. 192 – 198 88 Georgia............................................................................................... 199 – 200 91 Guatemala .......................................................................................... 201 – 231 92 Honduras ............................................................................................ 232 – 242 104 India ................................................................................................... 243 – 250 109 Indonesia ............................................................................................ 251 – 255 112 Iran (Islamic Republic of) .................................................................. 256 – 269 113 Iraq ..................................................................................................... 270 – 277 119 Israel................................................................................................... 278 – 289 122 Jamaica............................................................................................... 290 – 291 125 Kazakhstan......................................................................................... 292 – 294 126 Kenya ................................................................................................ 295 – 298 127 Kuwait................................................................................................ 299 – 301 128 Kyrgyzstan ......................................................................................... 302 – 305 129 Lebanon.............................................................................................. 306 – 310 130 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya..................................................................... 311 – 312 132 Malaysia............................................................................................. 313 – 315 132 Maldives............................................................................................. 316 – 325 133 Mexico ............................................................................................... 326 – 342 138 Mongolia ........................................................................................... 343 – 344 146 Morocco ............................................................................................. 345 – 349 147 Myanmar ............................................................................................ 350 – 358 150 Nepal .................................................................................................. 359 – 397 155 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1 Page 4 Niger................................................................................................... 398 – 402 173 Nigeria................................................................................................ 403 – 405 176 Pakistan .............................................................................................. 406 – 416 177 Paraguay............................................................................................. 417 – 419 181 Peru .................................................................................................... 420 – 425 182 Philippines.......................................................................................... 426 – 431 185 Poland................................................................................................. 432 – 433 188 Russian Federation............................................................................. 434 – 453 189 Saudi Arabia....................................................................................... 454 – 457 203 Serbia and Montenegro ..................................................................... 458 – 462 204 Sierra Leone ...................................................................................... 463 – 464 205 Sri Lanka............................................................................................ 465 – 470 206 Sudan.................................................................................................. 471 – 481 208 Syrian Arab Republic......................................................................... 482 – 496 213 Thailand ............................................................................................. 497 – 504 217 Togo .................................................................................................. 505 – 508 221 Tunisia................................................................................................ 509 – 544 222 Turkey ................................................................................................ 545 – 558 242 Uganda .............................................................................................. 559 – 560 247 United States of America ................................................................... 561 – 562 247 Uzbekistan ......................................................................................... 563 – 589 249 Venezuela........................................................................................... 590 – 595 267 Viet Nam............................................................................................ 595 – 602 269 Zimbabwe........................................................................................... 603 – 617 271 E/CN.4/2006/95/Add.1 Page 5 Introduction 1. The present document is submitted by the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the situation of human rights defenders, Ms. Hina Jilani, to the Commission on Human Rights pursuant to Commission resolution 2003/64. The document provides summaries of the communications on specific cases addressed by the Special Representative to Governments, as well as summaries of the replies by Governments that she has received and her observations thereon. 2. In the past, such information had been included in an annex. Following up on a practice
Recommended publications
  • TASK FORCE the Donald C
    HENRY M. JACKSON SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY of WASHINGTON TASK FORCE The Donald C. Hellmann Task Force Program Preventing ISIL’S Rebirth Through a Greater Understanding of Radicalization: A Case Study of ISIL Foreign Fighters 2020 Preventing ISIL’s Rebirth Through A Greater Understanding of Radicalization: A Case Study of ISIL Foreign Fighters Evaluator Corinne Graff, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Conflict Prevention and Fragility United States Institute of Peace (USIP) Faculty Advisor Denis Bašić, Ph.D. ~ Coordinator Orla Casey Editor Audrey Conrad Authors Orla Casey Audrey Conrad Devon Fleming Olympia Hunt Manisha Jha Fenyun Li Hannah Reilly Haley Rogers Aliye Volkan Jaya Wegner Our Task Force would like to express our gratitude towards Professor Denis Bašić, without whom this Task Force would not have been possible. Thank you for your guidance, expertise, and abundance of knowledge. We appreciate you always pushing us further towards a deeper understanding. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………….2 The Rise of ISIL and Foreign Fighters…………………………………………………………....3 Section I: Middle Eastern and North African ISIL Recruitment Saudi Arabia…………………………………………………………...………………………….7 Tunisia………………………………………………………………………………………...…13 Morocco………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Libya……………………………………………………………………………………………..17 Egypt……………………………………………………………………………………………..21 Jordan……………………………………………………………………………………………25 Lebanon………………………………………………………………………………………….30 Turkey……………………………………………………………………………………………34 Section II: South
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society in Uncivil Places: Soft State and Regime Change in Nepal
    48 About this Issue Recent Series Publications: Policy Studies 48 Policy Studies Policy This monograph analyzes the role of civil Policy Studies 47 society in the massive political mobilization Supporting Peace in Aceh: Development and upheavals of 2006 in Nepal that swept Agencies and International Involvement away King Gyanendra’s direct rule and dra- Patrick Barron, World Bank Indonesia matically altered the structure and character Adam Burke, London University of the Nepali state and politics. Although the opposition had become successful due to a Policy Studies 46 strategic alliance between the seven parlia- Peace Accords in Northeast India: mentary parties and the Maoist rebels, civil Journey over Milestones Places in Uncivil Society Civil society was catapulted into prominence dur- Swarna Rajagopalan, Political Analyst, ing the historic protests as a result of nation- Chennai, India al and international activities in opposition to the king’s government. This process offers Policy Studies 45 new insights into the role of civil society in The Karen Revolution in Burma: Civil Society in the developing world. Diverse Voices, Uncertain Ends By focusing on the momentous events of Ardeth Maung Thawnghmung, University of the nineteen-day general strike from April Massachusetts, Lowell 6–24, 2006, that brought down the 400- Uncivil Places: year-old Nepali royal dynasty, the study high- Policy Studies 44 lights the implications of civil society action Economy of the Conflict Region within the larger political arena involving con- in Sri Lanka: From Embargo to Repression ventional actors such as political parties, trade Soft State and Regime Muttukrishna Sarvananthan, Point Pedro unions, armed rebels, and foreign actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceasefires Sans Peace Process in Myanmar: the Shan State Army, 1989–2011
    Asia Security Initiative Policy Series Working Paper No. 26 September 2013 Ceasefires sans peace process in Myanmar: The Shan State Army, 1989–2011 Samara Yawnghwe Independent researcher Thailand Tin Maung Maung Than Senior Research Fellow Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) Singapore Asia Security Initiative Policy Series: Working Papers i This Policy Series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). The paper is an outcome of a project on the topic ‘Dynamics for Resolving Internal Conflicts in Southeast Asia’. This topic is part of a broader programme on ‘Bridging Multilevel and Multilateral Approaches to Conflict Prevention and Resolution’ under the Asia Security Initiative (ASI) Research Cluster ‘Responding to Internal Crises and Their Cross Border Effects’ led by the RSIS Centre for NTS Studies. The ASI is supported by the MacArthur Foundation. Visit http://www.asicluster3.com to learn more about the Initiative. More information on the work of the RSIS Centre for NTS Studies can be found at http://www.rsis.edu.sg/nts. Terms of use You are free to publish this material in its entirety or only in part in your newspapers, wire services, internet-based information networks and newsletters and you may use the information in your radio-TV discussions or as a basis for discussion in different fora, provided full credit is given to the author(s) and the Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Courage Newsletter
    Civil Courag e News Journal of the Civil Courage Prize Vol. 11, No. 2 • September 2015 For Steadfast Resistance to Evil at Great Personal Risk Bloomberg Editor-in-Chief John Guatemalans Claudia Paz y Paz and Yassmin Micklethwait to Deliver Keynote Barrios Win 2015 Civil Courage Prize Speech at the Ceremony for Their Pursuit of Justice and Human Rights ohn Micklethwait, Bloomberg’s his year’s recipients of the JEditor-in-Chief, oversees editorial TCivil Courage Prize, Dr. content across all platforms, including Claudia Paz y Paz and Judge Yassmin news, newsletters, Barrios, are extraordinary women magazines, opinion, who have taken great risks to stand television, radio and up to corruption and injustice in digital properties, as their native Guatemala. well as research ser- For over 18 years, Dr. Paz y Paz vices such as has been dedicated to improving her Claudia Paz y Paz Bloomberg Intelli - country’s human rights policies. She testing, wiretaps and other technol - gence. was the national consultant to the ogy, she achieved unprecedented re - Prior to joining UN mission in Guatemala and sults in sentences for homicide, rape, Bloomberg in February 2015, Mickle- served as a legal advisor to the violence against women, extortion thwait was Editor-in-Chief of The Econo - Human Rights Office of the Arch - and kidnapping. mist, where he led the publication into the bishop. In 1994, she founded the In - In a country where witnesses, digital age, while expanding readership stitute for Com- prosecutors, and and enhancing its reputation. parative Criminal judges were threat - He joined The Economist in 1987, as Studies of Guate- ened and killed, she a finance correspondent and served as mala, a human courageously Business Editor and United States Editor rights organization sought justice for before being named Editor-in-Chief in that promotes the victims of the 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamad Bin Isa Al Khalifa Amir of the State of Bahrain Issued at Rifa’A Palace On: 22Nd Dhu Al-Qi’Dah, 1421 Hijri Corresponding To: 16Th February, 2001 A.D
    Bahrain Institute For Political Development - BIPD Building No. 362 Road No. 3307 Block No. 333 Um Al-Hassam - Kingdom of Bahrain His Royal Highness His Majesty His Royal Highness Prince Khalifa bin Salman King Hamad bin Isa Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa Al Khalifa Al Khalifa The Prime Minister of the The King of the The Crown Prince, Deputy Kingdom of Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain Supreme Commander & First Deputy Prime Minister National Action Charter 2 National Action Charter 2020 Amiri Order No 17.of2001 With Respect to the Ratification of the National Action Charter(1) We, Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, Amir of the State of Bahrain, Having reviewed the Amiri Order No. (36) and (43) forming the Supreme National Committee to draft the National Action Charter, and the draft of the National Action Charter, and Amiri Order No. (8) of 2001 for inviting citizens to a referendum on the draft of the National Action Charter, and upon the decision of the Minister of Justice and Islamic Affairs No. (6) of 2001 to announce the result of the referendum on the draft National Action Charter, and upon what was confirmed to us, by the general public acceptance and overwhelming endorsement of the National Action Charter, by the result of the referendum, and as confirmation of the will of the people of Bahrain in approving the draft of the National Action Charter, which confirmed their desire to achieve a better and more prosperous future, and to open up better prospects for the future of Bahrain, which we want for a better and more beautiful future for us and the generations to come, 1- This is unofficial translation, in case of a difference between the Arabic and the English text; the Arabic text shall prevail updated on 6/4/2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    ASIA PACIFIC NEPAL FEDERAL COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: LOW INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: NEPALESE RUPEE (NPR) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 147 180 km 2 GDP: 79 billion (current PPP international dollars), 2 697 dollars per inhabitant (2017) Population: 29.305 million inhabitants (2017), an increase of 1.2% Real GDP growth: 7.5 % (2017 vs 2016) per year (2010-2015) Unemployment rate: 2.7 % (2017) Density: 199 inhabitants / km 2 Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 196 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population: 19.3 % of national population Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF): 34% of GDP (2017) Urban population growth: 3.2 % (2017 vs 2016) HDI: 0.574 (medium), ranking 149 (2017) Capital city: Kathmandu (4.5 % of national population) Poverty rate: 15% (2010) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Following the end in 2006 of a decade-long civil war, Nepal’s governance framework is currently in the transition from being a Monarchy to a multiparty democratic republic. With the promulgation of the new Constitution in 2015, Nepal moved from a unitary form of government to a federal one with a strong focus on decentralization based on “cooperative federalism”. The new federation has three tiers of government, namely federal, state and local, whereby powers shall be exercised pursuant to the Constitution and the state laws. The Constitution has assigned both exclusive and concurrent powers, to be jointly exercised by the federal and the state levels or jointly by all three tiers of government. The jurisdiction of the local governments is outlined under Schedule 8 of the Constitution, which establishes that local governments are responsible for development activities and for mobilizing the necessary resources to carry out such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruling Concerning Mawlid An-Nabawi
    the ruling concerning Mawlidan-nabawi (celebration of the Prophet’sr birthday) by Shaikh Saleh ibn Fawzan al-Fawzan with additional quotes from 'Hukm al-Ihtifal bil-Mawlid war-Radd ala man ajaaz' by Shaikh Muhammad ibn Ibraheem Aal-Shaikh A Dialogue between Shaikh al-Albanee and a proponent of Mawlid translated by Shawana A. Aziz Published by Quran Sunnah Educational Programs www.qsep.com Index Introduction............................................................................................................01 The celebration of Mawlid an-Nabawi is prohibited and rejected due to several reasons.............................................................................................................0 7 1. The celebration of Mawlid is neither from the Sunnah of Allah's Messengerr nor his Caliphs.......................................................................... 08 2. Celebrating Mawlid (birthday) of Allah's Messengerr is an imitation of the Christians............................................................................... 09 3. Mawlid is also a means of exaggeration in the honor of Allah's Messengerr ...................................................................................................... 10 4. Celebrating the Bidah of Mawlid opens the door to other innovations........................................................................................................... 11 Clarifying Doubts Doubt 1: Celebration of Mawlid is honoring the Prophetr .....................14 Doubt 2: Mawlid is celebrated by a
    [Show full text]
  • Menemukan Kembali Indonesia
    MENEMUKAN KEMBALI INDONESIA: Memahami Empat Puluh Tahun Kekerasan demi Memutus Rantai Impunitas ii DI SINI NANTI AKAN DIIISI JUDUL BUKU MENEMUKAN KEMBALI INDONESIA: Memahami Empat Puluh Tahun Kekerasan demi Memutus Rantai Impunitas LAPORAN TAHUN KEBENARAN KKPK KOALISI UNTUK KEADILAN DAN PENGUNGKAPAN KEBENARAN iv DI SINI NANTI AKAN DIIISI JUDUL BUKU Judul : Menemukan Kembali Indonesia Cetakan : Pertama, 2014 Foto Isi : ELSAM, AJAR, Tempo, SKP HAM Palu, Anne-Cècile Esteve, Galuh Wandita, Robby Noordian Al Wahidy, Selviana Yolanda. Desain Isi : Satoejari dan Sampul Ukuran Buku : 20 x 27 cm ISBN : Percetakan : MENEMUKAN ________________________________________________________ KEMBALI INDONESIA Diterbitkan oleh Koalisi untuk Keadilan dan Pengungkapan Kebenaran (KKPK) Sekretariat KKPK: Jl. Cikini Raya No. 43, Jakarta Pusat 10330 | Telp. +62-21-3152726 ________________________________________________________________________ SEKAPUR SIRIH “Aku pikir kami sudah dilupakan. Tapi sekarang aku punya harapan lagi bisa mendapatkan kebenaran dan keadilan.” — Marsini (kakak Marsinah), Dengar Kesaksian KKPK tema Kekerasan terhadap Pembela HAM, Jakarta 29 November 2013 alam perjalanan bangsa ini kita salah-jalan. Kita mengambil jalan pintas kekerasan dan akhirnya hilang di tengah hutan belukar impunitas. Kita Dmenjauh dari arah dan cita-cita Konstitusi. Kita pun kita tak lagi setia pada gagasan awal reformasi. Pengalaman 40 tahun bangsa ini menunjukkan ribuan bahkan jutaan warga negara Indonesia justru terpuruk di dalam pusaran ketidakadilan dan seakan tak punya ruang dan harapan untuk menemukan kembali mimpi mereka tentang Indonesia. Sekarang telah tiba saatnya untuk menemukan Indonesia kembali, Indonesia seperti yang dicita-citakan oleh para pendiri bangsa -Indonesia yang menyejahterakan, Indonesia yang menghargai, Indonesia yang melindungi, dan Indonesia yang menjamin hak-hak konstitusional segenap warga negaranya. Kehausan akan kebenaran dan keadilan yang disuarakan oleh Marsini, dirasakan juga oleh ribuan korban pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM) di Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on Nepali Castes and Sub-Castes—Jat and Thar
    SOME NOTES ON NEPALI CASTES AND SUB-CASTES- JAT AND THAR. - Suresh Singh This paper attempts to make a re-presentation of evolution and construction of Jat and Thar system among the Parbatya or hill people of Nepal. It seeks to expose the reality behind the myth that the large number of Aryans migrated from Indian plains due to Muslim invasion and conquered to become the rulers in Nepal, and the Mongoloids were the indigenous people. It also seeks to show the construction and reconstruction of identity of the different castes (Jats) and subcastes (Thars). The Nepalese history is lost in legends and fables. Archaeological data, which might shed light on the early years, are practically nonexistent or largely unexplored, because the Nepalese Government has not encouraged such research within its borders. However, there seem to be a number of sites that might yield valuable find, once proper excavation take place. Another problem seems to be that history writing is closely connected with the traditional conception of Nepali historiography, constructed and intervened by the efforts of the ruling elite. Many of the written documents have been re-presented to legitimatize the ruling elite’s claim to power. As it is well known from political history, the social history, too, becomes an interpretation from the view of the Kathmandu valley, and from the Indian or alleged Indian immigrants and priestly class. It is difficult to imagine, that Aryans came to Nepal in greater numbers about 600 years ago, and because of their mental superiority and their noble character, they were asked by the people to become the rulers of their small states.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    No. 43 Working Papers Working Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India‘s Role in Nepal‘s Recent Constitution-Making Process Prakash Bhattarai December 2018 1 Negotiating Between Unequal Neighbours: India’s Role in Nepal’s Recent Constitution-Making Process1 Prakash Bhattarai ABSTRACT Nepal’s post-conflict constitution-making process has seen the involvement of many international actors. While studies on democracy promotion, to this day, mainly focus on Western “donors” and international organizations, this paper looks at the role played by India in the complicated process of moving from a peace agreement to the establishment of an inclusive, democratic constitution in Nepal. More specifically, it is analysed how a powerful neighbouring democracy (India) participated in what is essentially a domestic negotiation process (constitution-making) with a view to influencing the emerging demo- cratic regime. In terms of the issues on the negotiation table, the analysis shows that India, in pushing for an inclusive constitution, pursued the specific agenda of supporting the inclusion of the Madheshis, an ethnic group mostly living in Nepal’s Terai region. In terms of negotiation strategies, the paper identifies four different ways in which India tried to influence the constitution: high-level dialogue; economic blockade; international coalition building; and targeted support of domestic oppositional forces in Nepal. Com- prehensive as this negotiation strategy was, it only met with partial success. Parameters that limited India’s influence included the domestic strength and legitimacy of the official Nepali position (elite alignment; popular support) as well as scepticism concerning In- dia’s role in Nepal, which was reinforced by India’s overly partisan agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Silencing Dissent
    Silencing Dissent SILENCING DISSENT The ongoing imprisonment of Burma’s political activists In the lead up to the 2010 elections Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma) P.O Box 93, Mae Sot, Tak Province 63110, Thailand, e.mail: [email protected], web: www.aappb.org Silencing Dissent Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma) P.O Box 93, Mae Sot, Tak Province 63110, Thailand, e.mail: [email protected], web: www.aappb.org Silencing Dissent Repression to silence dissent The widespread and unlawful detention of political activists has a significant impact on Burma's political environment in two main ways. Firstly, most of the prominent activists are removed from public or political life. Almost all of the 88 Generation student movement leadership is in prison preventing them from organising against the elections or educating the people on political issues. Lead members of National League for Democracy party, including democracy icon Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, are imprisoned, as are lead ethnic politicians who promote a peaceful tripartite dialogue and national reconciliation, such Gen Hso Ten and U Khun Tun Oo. Secondly, the harsh sentences handed down and the torture and punishments inflicted on political activists threatens the wider population, sending a clear message: refrain from opposition activities or risk the consequences. The consequences are well known. Unlawful arrest and detention and torture are practiced systematically in Burma and occurred throughout 2009 and 2010. These practices pose an ongoing threat to civilians; ensuring populations live in fear, thereby preventing any politically critical activities. This fear stifles dissent, prevents a vibrant civil society and halts any criticism of the regime; key components of a genuine democratic transition.
    [Show full text]
  • In Nepal : Citizens’ Perspectives on the Rule of Law and the Role of the Nepal Police
    Calling for Security and Justice in Nepal : Citizens’ Perspectives on the Rule of Law and the Role of the Nepal Police Author Karon Cochran-Budhathoki Editors Shobhakar Budhathoki Nigel Quinney Colette Rausch With Contributions from Dr. Devendra Bahadur Chettry Professor Kapil Shrestha Sushil Pyakurel IGP Ramesh Chand Thakuri DIG Surendra Bahadur Shah DIG Bigyan Raj Sharma DIG Sushil Bar Singh Thapa Printed at SHABDAGHAR OFFSET PRESS Kathmandu, Nepal United States Institute of Peace National Mall at Constitution Avenue 23rd Street NW, Washington, DC www.usip.org Strengthening Security and Rule of Law Project in Nepal 29 Narayan Gopal Marg, Battisputali Kathmandu, Nepal tel/fax: 977 1 4110126 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] © 2011 United States Institute of Peace All rights reserved. © 2011 All photographs in this report are by Shobhakar Budhathoki All rights reserved. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. CONTENTS Foreword by Ambassador Richard H. Solomon, President of the United States Institute of Peace VII Acknowledgments IX List of Abbreviations XI Chapter 1 Summary 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the Survey 3 1.2 Survey Results 4 1.2.1 A Public Worried by Multiple Challenges to the Rule of Law, but Willing to Help Tackle Those Challenges 4 1.2.2 The Vital Role of the NP in Creating a Sense of Personal Safety 4 1.2.3 A Mixed Assessment of Access to Security 5 1.2.4 Flaws in the NP’s Investigative Capacity Encourage “Alternative
    [Show full text]