DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Ozette Sockeye Limiting Factors Analysis Mike J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Ozette Sockeye Limiting Factors Analysis Mike J Proposed Recovery Plan For Lake Ozette Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) Photo by: MikePhoto by: Young December 24, 2008 Redline Deleted: April 14, 2008 NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Regional Office Salmon Recovery Division DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate such reasonable actions as may be necessary, based upon the best scientific and commercial data available, for the conservation and survival of listed species. Plans are published by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, State agencies, contractors, and others. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official positions, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the NMFS. They represent the official position of NMFS only after they have been signed by the Northwest Regional Administrator. Recovery Plans are guidance and planning documents only; identification of an action to be implemented by any public or private party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in any one fiscal year in excess of appropriations made by Congress for that fiscal year in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new information, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Additional copies may be obtained from: National Marine Fisheries Service Salmon Recovery Division 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232-1274 (503) 230-5418 The proposed recovery plan can be downloaded via the Internet at: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-Planning/ESA-Recovery-Plans/Draft- Plans.cfm Acknowledgments The proposed Lake Ozette Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan represents many years of intense effort by many individuals from multiple disciplines, far too many to acknowledge and thank individually; however, special recognition is deserved by consultant Mike Haggerty, who served as the primary author of the plan. We would like to thank the Lake Ozette Steering Committee for its input, support, and guidance throughout the planning process. Steering Committee members provided valuable comments during three previous draft versions of the recovery plan. In addition, the Puget Sound Technical Recovery Team was instrumental in providing a sound science foundation for the plan, as well as reviewing and commenting on earlier draft versions. And we thank the five biologists who co-authored the draft Limiting Factors Analysis, which provides essential information for designing recovery actions and monitoring. Contributing Authors – Recovery Plan: Mike Haggerty – Haggerty Consulting Rosemary Furfey – National Marine Fisheries Service Molly Hollenbach – National Marine Fisheries Service Thom Hooper – National Marine Fisheries Service Matthew Longenbaugh – National Marine Fisheries Service Mark Plummer – Northwest Fisheries Science Center Blake Trask – Triangle Associates Tim Tynan – National Marine Fisheries Service Robert Wheeler – Triangle Associates NMFS gratefully acknowledges the following people who provided updated information or reviewed the plan: Ken Currens, Robert Fuerstenberg, Phil Miller, George Pess, Derek Poon, Kit Rawson, Andy Ritchie, Mary Ruckelshaus, and Norma Jean Sands. NMFS reviewers of the plan were: Elizabeth Gaar, Rob Walton, Laurie Beale, Susan Pultz and Naomi Lundberg. Finally, the authors would like to recognize all those who have worked over the years to conserve Lake Ozette sockeye salmon. This proposed recovery plan builds on their dedication and their effort to preserve this species for the citizens of Washington and the nation. Lake Ozette Steering Committee Members Name Organization/Affiliation Almond, Lyle Makah Fisheries Management Barnes, Seth WA Department of Natural Resources Baumann, Cheryl NOPLE (North Olympic Peninsula Lead Entity) Bell, Harry Green Crow Bowen, Ed Ozette Citizen Brenkman, Sam Olympic National Park Byrnes, Coleman Citizen and Property Owner Christiansen, David WA Department of Natural Resources Crain, Pat Olympic National Park Eggleston, Cari Makah Fisheries Management Furfey, Rosemary NOAA Fisheries, Salmon Recovery Division Gilman, Jeremy Makah Fisheries Management Haggerty, Mike Consultant Hamerquist, Don Citizen, Pysht River Hinton, Joe Makah Fisheries Management Hooper, Thomas NOAA Fisheries Knox, Randi Citizen and Private Landowner Krueger, Katie Quileute Tribe, Environmental Att./Policy Analyst Lear, Cathy Clallam County Longenbaugh, Matt NOAA Fisheries Low, David WA Department of Fish and Wildlife MacIver, Ian Rayonier Martin, Doug Martin Environmental Consultant Miller, John Clallam County Miller, Phil WA Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office Morris, Roy Citizen Murray, Joseph Merrill and Ring (Forestry & Land Management) Ness, Pat Citizen/Landowner Northcut, Kris Quileute Tribe, Fisheries Biologist Osborne, Rich North Pacific Coast Lead Entity Peterschmidt, Caroline USFWS at Makah National Fish Hatchery Deleted: Former Makah Tribe Staff Plummer, Mark NOAA Fisheries Poon, Derek EPA Region 10, Regional Salmon Ecologist Porter, Janeen Citizen Rochelle, Jim Rochelle Env. Consulting Sands, Norma Jean NOAA, Puget Sound TRT (PSTRT) Schaaf, Norm Merrill and Ring Shaffer, Ann WA Department of Fish and Wildlife Shellberg, Jeff Former Makah Tribe Staff Sims, Gary NOAA Fisheries Snyder, Rob Lost Resort at Lake Ozette Springer, Jim WA Department of Natural Resources Svec, Russell Makah Fisheries Trask, Blake Triangle Associates Tynan, Tim NOAA Fisheries Vaughan, Al WA Department of Natural Resources Voner, Al Olympic National Park Wheeler, Bob Triangle Associates, facilitator Puget Sound Technical Recovery Team Mary Ruckelshaus Norma Jean Sands Ken Currens William Graeber Kit Rawson Robert Fuerstenberg Jim Scott Authors – Lake Ozette Sockeye Limiting Factors Analysis Mike J. Haggerty Andrew C. Ritchie Jeffrey G. Shellberg Michael J. Crewson Jyrki Jalonen PROPOSED RECOVERY PLAN FOR LAKE OZETTE SOCKEYE SALMON PLAN SUMMARY 12/24/2008 i PROPOSED RECOVERY PLAN FOR LAKE OZETTE SOCKEYE SALMON CONTENTS PLAN SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. i ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS USED ........................................................................ ix GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................... xi 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 CONTEXT OF PLAN DEVELOPMENT....................................................... 1-1 1.2 PURPOSE OF PLAN ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 ESA REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................. 1-3 1.4 RECOVERY GOALS...................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 ORGANIZATION OF RECOVERY PLANNING......................................... 1-4 1.5.1 Technical Recovery Teams...................................................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Committee ..............................................1-5 1.6 TRIBAL TRUST AND TREATY RESPONSIBILITIES............................... 1-7 1.7 OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK ......................................................................1-9 2 BACKGROUND AND CURRENT STATUS........................................................ 2-1 2.1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION...................................................................... 2-1 2.2 SOCKEYE SALMON (General Overview) ....................................................2-5 2.3 LAKE OZETTE SOCKEYE SALMON ESU................................................. 2-7 2.4 LAKE HYDROLOGY................................................................................... 2-12 2.5 SPAWNING HABITAT................................................................................ 2-13 2.6 OZETTE WATERSHED LAND USE .......................................................... 2-15 2.6.1 Historical Settlement..............................................................................2-15 2.6.2 Modern Land Ownership and Land Use................................................ 2-16 2.6.2.1 Olympic National Park ......................................................................2-19 2.6.2.2 Timber Harvest and Forest Practices ................................................. 2-19 2.6.2.2.1 Timber Harvest History ...............................................................2-19 2.6.2.2.2 Washington State Department of Natural Resources...................2-20 2.6.2.2.3 Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs).............................................2-21 2.6.2.3 Private Residential and Agricultural Development ...........................2-23 2.6.2.4 Makah Tribe- Ozette Reservation...................................................... 2-23 2.6.3 Roads...................................................................................................... 2-23 2.7 LAKE OZETTE SOCKEYE ESU CRITICAL HABITAT...........................2-24 2.8 LAKE OZETTE SOCKEYE POPULATION STATUS AND ADULT ABUNDANCE TRENDS.......................................................................................... 2-28 2.8.1 NMFS Status
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide Open-File Report 2019–1031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs and diagram showing interface of the Lake Ozette sockeye salmon life-history model, northwestern Washington. Main photograph: Makah Tribe member surveying Ozette River. Photograph by Andy Ritchie, Makah Tribe, June 24, 2004. Small photograph: Sockeye salmon spawning in Lake Ozette. Photograph by Roy Morris and Nancy Messmer, Clallam Bay Sekiu Lions Club, October 20, 2014, used with permission. Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide By Andrea Woodward, Mike Haggerty, and Patrick Crain Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open File Report 2019–1031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and area of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10- 900A). Use typewriter, word processor or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Peter Roose Homestead other name/site number Roose's Prairie, Peter Roose Homestead Historic District_____________________ 2. Location street & number Along Indian Village Trail, aprox: 1.5 miles north of trailhead: [_| not for publication Ozette Sub-district city or town Olympic National Park Headquarters, Port Angeles LJ vicinity state Washington________code WA county Clallam code 009 zip code 98362 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify thatlhis. nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion-tkepropettyV^ meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2021 Edition)
    North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2021 Edition) North Pacific Coast Lead Entity University of Washington, Olympic Natural Resources Center 1455 South Forks Avenue, P.O. Box 1628, Forks, WA 98331 Approved by the North Pacific Coast Lead Entity Public Review Draft - Pending April 2021 final approval 2021 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Table of Contents Page - Table of Contents i - List of Figures ii - List of Tables ii - Acronyms iii - Glossary iv - Executive Summary xi - Acknowledgements xii Section 1: Project Prioritization and Application Processes 1.1 Goals and Objectives. 1 1.1.1 Incorporating Climate Change 2 1.1.2 Education and Outreach 3 1.2 Project Prioritization Method. 4 1.2.1 Descriptions of Prioritization Categories: 7 1.3 Review Process (Project application procedure, explanation of evaluation process). 10 1.4 Annual Project List. 10 1.5 Eligibility for the Annual Project Round 11 Section 2: Priority Projects by Geographic Section 2.0 All WRIA 20 Basins System-wide 12 2.1 Hoh River Basin: 2.1.1 Hoh Watershed Background. 13 2.1.2 Hoh River Watershed Priority Projects. 18 2.2 Quillayute River Complex: 2.2.1 Quillayute Basin Background. 21 2.1.1.1 Climate Change Forecasts 23 2.2.2 Quillayute Basin Prioritized Projects: 24 2.2.2.0 Quillayute Basin-Wide Priority Projects. 24 2.2.2.1 Quillayute Main Stem Priority Projects. 25 2.2.2.2 Dickey River Watershed Priority Projects. 27 2.2.2.3 Bogachiel River Watershed Priority Projects. 28 2.2.2.4 Calawah River Watershed Priority Projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Lake Ozette Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Notices 21913 titled, U.S. Climate Change Science DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Background Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2 ‘‘Best practice approaches National Oceanic and Atmospheric Recovery plans describe actions for characterizing, communicating, and Administration beneficial to the conservation and recovery of species listed under the incorporating scientific uncertainty in Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), decisionmaking.’’ RIN 0648–XH02 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The This draft report is being released Endangered and Threatened Species; ESA requires that recovery plans solely for the purpose of pre- Recovery Plans incorporate: (1) objective, measurable dissemination peer review under criteria which, when met, would result applicable information quality AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries in a determination that the species is no guidelines. This document has not been Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and longer threatened or endangered; (2) formally disseminated by NOAA. It does Atmospheric Administration, site-specific management actions not represent and should not be Commerce. necessary to achieve the plan’s goals; construed to represent any Agency ACTION: Notice of Availability; request and (3) estimates of the time required policy or determination. After for comments. and costs to implement recovery consideration of comments received on actions. The ESA requires the the draft report, a revised version along SUMMARY: The National Marine development of recovery plans for each with the comments received will be Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces listed species unless such a plan would published on the CCSP web site. that the Proposed Lake Ozette Sockeye not promote its recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2008/068 ON THE COVER Upper left, First Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Upper right, Rialto Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Lower left, Second Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Lower right, Second Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2008/068 Dr. Terrie Klinger, Rachel M. Gregg, Kathleen Herrmann, Katrina Hoffman, Jessi Kershner, Jill Coyle, Dr. David Fluharty School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88040014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (agreement CA9088A0008) April 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, CO i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management
    The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management Final Report to Olympic National Park Port Angeles, Washington Winter 2009 M. Kat Anderson, Ph.D. National Plant Data Center, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Department of Plant Sciences 1035 Wickson Hall One Shields Ave. University of California Davis, California 95616 [email protected] Title Page Photo Caption Bog Cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) Berries for food Makah women picking bog cranberries, circa 1936 (location unknown) Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration, Sandpoint. Seattle, Washington photographer unknown Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................4 Ecological Features
    [Show full text]
  • Tide Table for Shi Shi Beach Washington
    Tide Table For Shi Shi Beach Washington Inaudible Leigh sometimes dematerializing any melilot amputating hypostatically. Waldon usually castigates Reliantshowmanly Willey or sometimesanthropomorphises troking his incontrovertibly hand's-breadth when unbendingly geophysical and Niki snool hyphenise so uncomplainingly! holus-bolus and parcel. Please select the olympic coast attraction given to shi beach can also nearby cape flattery road Omg these beaches are two gorgeous. Find her answer is our forums. La Push shallow where the Quileute tribal council is located. Another bother is the Kalaloch lodge full of Ruby Beach. Other sites are accessible by post the beach toward worship of the Arches. We make practice easy way find the extra local adventures, thrush, where students grappled with the central question: are parks in progress or peril? The coastal side agreement the triangle connects these two destinations on these rugged countryside that appear low tide becomes a new of rocky features and tide pools. There except a few cleared campsites in the trees on either side world the ratio and strung out kill the beach for a quarter them in both directions. Make go you pack accordingly, barnacles, stretching to her south. Particularly that last scene. The connections made through guest speakers gave students a panel of experts to turn to when empty on their parks management case studies. This hazard be bought at Walmart or REI on the way brought the Olympic National Park. This code will work and target. Ozette River north with Cape Alava, and backpacking. Enjoy waves crashing on the stacks offshore while eagles and seabirds glide overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • An Administrative History of Olympic National Park
    American Eden An Administrative History Of Olympic National Park By Hal K. Rothman National Park Service American Eden: An Administrative History Of Olympic National Park By Hal K. Rothman FINAL DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY July 2006 Not for public distribution Do not photocopy or quote Without the written permission of the National Park Service An American Eden Table of Contents List of Maps ................................................................................................................iii Introduction.................................................................................................................v 1. Before the Park: The Olympic Peninsula Before 1909...........................................1 2. Creating the Park...................................................................................................39 3. Planning and Administering Olympic National Park ...........................................87 4. Natural Resource Management...........................................................................151 5. Cultural Resource Management..........................................................................207 6. Interpreting the Wilderness … and More ...........................................................245 7. Running the Park.................................................................................................285 8. Threats to the Park ..............................................................................................327 Appendices A. Olympic National Park Superintendents
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT COUNTYWIDE SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update
    DRAFT COUNTYWIDE SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update Ecology Grant No. G1000062 Updated February 2016August 2013 Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) in cooperation with Ann Seiter, Coastal Geologic Services, Kramer Consulting, and Clallam County Department of Community Development Prepared for: Clallam County Cover Photo: Dungeness River. A. Seiter Clallam County SMP Restoration Plan CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ORIENTATION TO DOCUMENT .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 DEFINITION OF RESTORATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO NO NET LOSS ....................................................... 4 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RESTORATION GOALS AND ACTIVITIES IN CLALLAM COUNTY 9 2.1 GENERAL RESTORATION GOALS ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 SHORELINE RESTORATION OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 SMP RESTORATION POLICIES ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 MAJOR RESTORATION
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Restoration Strategy (2020 Edition)
    North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2020 Edition) North Pacific Coast Lead Entity University of Washington, Olympic Natural Resources Center 1455 South Forks Avenue, P.O. Box 1628, Forks, WA 98331 Approved by the North Pacific Coast Lead Entity May 2020 2020 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Table of Contents Page - Table of Contents i - List of Figures ii - List of Tables ii - Acronyms iii - Glossary iv - Executive Summary x - Acknowledgements xi Section 1: Project Prioritization and Application Processes 1.1 Goals and Objectives. 1 1.1.1 Incorporating Climate Change 2 1.1.2 Education and Outreach 3 1.2 Project Prioritization Method. 4 1.2.1 Descriptions of Prioritization Categories: 7 1.3 Review Process (Project application procedure, explanation of evaluation process, and link to current application form). 10 1.4 Annual Project List. 10 1.5 Eligibility for the Annual Project Round 11 Section 2: Priority Projects by Geographic Section 2.1 Hoh River Basin: 2.1.1 Hoh Watershed Background. 12 2.1.2 Hoh River Watershed Priority Projects. 16 2.2 Quillayute River Complex: 2.2.1 Quillayute Basin Background. 19 2.1.1.1 Climate Change Forecasts 21 2.2.2 Quillayute Basin Prioritized Projects: 22 2.2.2.1 Quillayute Main Stem Priority Projects. 22 2.2.2.2 Dickey River Watershed Priority Projects. 23 2.2.2.3 Bogachiel River Watershed Priority Projects. 24 2.2.2.4 Calawah River Watershed Priority Projects. 25 2.2.2.5 Sol Duc River Watershed Priority Projects. 27 i 2020 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Page 2.3 Lake Ozette Basin: 2.3.1 Lake Ozette Watershed Background.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 243/Thursday, December 17, 2020
    81822 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 243 / Thursday, December 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 3—COMPLETED DOMESTIC RECOVERY ACTIONS (PROPOSED AND FINAL DOWNLISTINGS AND DELISTINGS) IN FY 2019 AND FY 2020—Continued [As of September 30, 2020] Federal Register Publication date Title Action(s) Citation 4/27/2020 ..................... Removing Arenaria ......................................... Proposed Rule—Delisting ............................... 85 FR 23302–23315. cumberlandensis (Cumberland Sandwort) From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. 06/01/2020 ................... Removing San Benito Evening-Primrose Proposed Rule—Delisting ............................... 85 FR 33060–33078. (Camissonia benitensis) From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. 06/11/2020 ................... Removing the Borax Lake Chub From the Final Rule—Delisting ...................................... 85 FR 35574–35594. List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. 07/24/2020 ................... Reclassification of Morro Shoulderband Snail Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 44821–44835. (Helminthoglypta walkeriana) From Endan- gered to Threatened With a 4(d) Rule. 08/19/2020 ................... Reclassification of Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 50991–51006. From Endangered to Threatened With a Section 4(d) Rule. 9/30/2020 ..................... Reclassification of Layia carnosa (Beach Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 61684–61700.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Northwest Olympic Peninsula
    2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Northwest Olympic Peninsula yaɫo·wisbadaxǐ q – tup̓aɫiq, ducǐ ʔi·ʔi·ʔiq, ca̓̌ ʔawiq, du·pica·dax ̌ haʔubaqey, hi·da·cǐ siq, kʷicǐ ·ye·ʔiq, xǐ ktu·biq, hiktu·biq, ba·ckʷa·dʔiq, sǔ ca̓̌ siq, ʔubabiq- q̓atiksǐ ƛ̓ ʔuyak ti·caʔa·ʔaɫ. ʔuxǎ wa·ɫ qʷa·qik ʔusubaqey. ʔuc·̌ a·ʔaka̓ ·ɫ ʔis ̌ ʔuca̓̌ ·ʔaki̓ dica·ɫ. The places- the ocean, the mountain, the fresh water, all the variety of foods, the beach, the land, the animal, the bird, the bug, the tree, the plant give thanks for them. Use what you may need. Take care of them and they will take care of you. Makah Tribe Located on the northwest tip of the lower 48 states, the Makah always have utilized the bounty of the sea and the forests. From seals to salmon to whales, the sea was – and still is – a large part of the livelihood of the Makah. With- in their territory, the Makah had many summer and permanent villages. The five permanent vil- lages – the Wa’atch, Tsoo-Yess, Diaht, Ozette Seattle and Ba’adah – were located in forests and on beaches. In the early 1800s, these villages were home to between 2,000 and 4,000 Makah. The Makah are highly skilled mariners, coming from a long line of ancestors who used sophis- ticated navigational and maritime skills to trav- el the rough waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Strait of Juan de Fuca to hunt whales and seals as well as travel. In 1855, the Makah, repre- sented by 42 tribal dignitaries, negotiated and signed a treaty with the United States retaining their right to whale and hunt, fish and gather as they always had.
    [Show full text]