DOCSLIB.ORG

WRIA 20 ICR Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WRIA 20 ICR Bibliography WRIA 20 ICR Bibliography Abbe, T, S. Fisher, M. McBride and A. Ritchie. 2002. The effects of Ozette River logjams on Lake Ozette: Assessing historic conditions and the potential for restoring logjams. Prepared by Philip Williams & Associates for the Makah Tribe. Agee, J.K. 1994. Catastrophic forest disturbance on the Olympic Peninsula. Research paper prepared for Rayonier Inc. P.O. Box 200 Hoquiam, WA. Allison, S., et. al. 2000. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors in the North Washington Coastal Streams of WRIA 20. WRIA 20 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. Beauchamp, D. A. and M.G. LaRiviere. 1993. An evaluation of competition and predation as limits to juvenile sockeye salmon production in Lake Ozette, Washington. Final Report to Makah Tribe. Makah Fisheries Management, Neah Bay, Washington. 67 pp. Beauchamp, D. A., M.G. LaRiviere, and G.L. Thomas. 1995. Evaluation of competition and predation as limits to juvenile kokanee and sockeye salmon production in Lake Ozette, Washington. North Amer. Journal of Fish Management 15: 193-207. Beechie, T., E. Beamer, and L. Wasserman. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:797–811. Beechie, T. J., and S. Bolton. 1999. An approach to restoring salmonid habitat-forming processes in Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 24(4):6–15. Beechie, T.J., E.A. Steel, P. Roni, and E. Quimby (editors). 2003. Ecosystem recovery planning for listed salmon: an integrated assessment approach for salmon habitat. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Technical Memo. NMFS-NWFSC- 58, 183 p. Benda, L. 1996. Stream Channel Assessment. In North Fork Calawah Watershed Analysis. Olympic National Forest, Olympia, WA. Benda, L. C. Veldhuisen and J. Black. 2003. Debris flows as agents of morphological heterogeneity at low- order confluences, Olympic Mountains, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin: Vol. 115, No. 9, pp. 1110- 1121. Beschta, R.L., R.E. Bilby, G.W. Brown, L.B. Holtby, and T.D. Hofstra. 1987. Stream temperatures and aquatic habitat: fisheries and forestry interactions. In E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy (eds). Streamside management: forestry and fisheries interactions, p. 191-232. University of Washington. Contribution No. 57, Seattle. Bilby, R. E., K. Sullivan, and S. H. Duncan. 1989. The generation and fate of road-surface sediment in forested watersheds in southwestern Washington. Forest Science 35:453–468. Bishop, S. and A. Morgan. 1996. Critical habitat issues by basin for natural Chinook stocks in the Coastal and Puget Sound Areas of Washington State. NWIFC, Lacey, Washington. Bisson, P.A., R.E. Bilby, M.D. Bryant, C.A. Dolloff, G.B. Grette, R.A. House, M.L. Murphy, K.V. Koski, and J.R. Sedell. 1987. Large woody debris in the Pacific Northwest: past, present and future. In E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy (eds). Streamside management: forestry and fisheries interactions, p. 143-190. University of Washington. Contribution No. 57, Seattle. Bjornn, T.C. and D.W. Reiser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19:83-138. Blew, R.D. and R.L. Edmonds. 1995. Precipitation along an inland transect on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Journal of Environmental Quality, 24:239-245. Blum, J.P. 1984. Management strategies for restoration and rehabilitation of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Lake Ozette, WA. Pages 55-62 in J.M. Walton and D. B. Houston, editors. Proceedings of the Olympic Wild Fish Conference. Fisheries Technology Program, Peninsula College and Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, Washington. Blum, J.P. 1988. Assessment of factors affecting sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) production in Ozette Lake, Washington. M.S. Thesis. University of Washington, Seattle. 107 pp. Bortleson, G.C. and N.P. Dion. 1979. Preferred and observed conditions for sockeye salmon in Ozette Lake and its tributaries, Clallam County, Washington. United States Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Water- Resources Investigations 78-64. Tacoma, WA. Boyce, J.S. 1929. Deterioration of wind-thrown timber on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. USDATech. Bull. 104. Washington DC. Brannon, E.L. 1972. Mechanisms controlling migration of sockeye salmon fry. Internat. Pac. Salmon Fis. Comm. Bull. #21. 86 p. Brenkman, S. J. and S. C. Corbett. 2005. Extent of anadromy in bull trout and implications for conservation of a threatened species. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:1073-1081. Bretherton, K., D. Christensen, and T. Taylor. 1998. Riparian Function Assessment. In E/W Dickey Watershed Analysis Draft Report. Pentec Environmental, Inc. Edmonds, WA. Bretherton, K., D. Christensen, and T. Taylor. In preparation. A discussion and study of windthrow and its impacts to riparian management zones (RMZs). Brett, J.R. 1952. Temperature tolerances in young Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 9:268- 323 Brummer, C. J. and Montgomery, D. R., Downstream coarsening in headwater channels, Water Resources Research, 39(10), 1294, doi: 10.1029/2003WR001981, 2003. Busby, P.J., T.C. Wainwright, G.J. Bryant, L.J. Lierheimer, R.S. Waples, F. W. Waknitz, and I.V. Lagomarsino. 1996. Status Review of West Coast Steelhead from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-27, 261 pp. Bustard, D.R., and D.W. Narver. 1975. Aspects of winter ecology of juvenile coho salmon(Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead trout (Salmon gairdneri). Journal Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32:667-680. Cederholm, C. J., and W. J. Scarlett. 1991. The beaded channel: a low-cost technique for enhancing winter habitat of coho salmon. Pages 104–108 in J. Colt and R. J. White, editors. Fisheries bioengineering symposium. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 10, Bethesda, Maryland. Chesney, C. 1996. Channel Morphology. In Sol Duc Pilot Watershed Analysis. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. Chitwood, S.A. 1981. Quillayute River navigational project: water quality, salmonid fish, smelt, crab, and subtidal studies. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Environmental Resources, Seattle, Washington. Christensen, D. 1996. Riparian. In Sol Duc Pilot Watershed Analysis. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. Cobb, J.N. 1930. Pacific Salmon Fisheries. Appendix XIII to the Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Fisheries for 1930. Bureau of Fisheries Document No.1092, U.S. Bureau of Fisheries. Coho, C.S. 1993. Dam break floods in low order mountain channels of the Pacific Northwest. MS Thesis, University of Washington. Conroy, S. C. 1997. Habitat lost and found, part two. Pages 7–13 in Washington trout, editors. Washington Trout, Washington Trout Technical Report, Duvall, Washington. Cooper, R. and T.H. Johnson. 1992. Trends in steelhead abundance in Washington and along the Pacific Coast of North America. Washington Department of Wildlife, Fisheries Management Division. Report No. 92-20. Olympia, Washington. Crewson, M., J. Freudenthal, P. Gearin, M. Haggerty, J. Haymes, J. Meyer, A. Ritchie, and W. Sammarco. 2002. Lake Ozette sockeye Limiting Factors Analysis. DRAFT. Prepared as part of the Lake Ozette Steering Committee. Cummans, J.E., M.R. Collins, and E.G. Nassar. 1975. Magnitude and frequency of floods in Washington. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 74-336. D. B. Houston, editors. Proceedings of the Olympic Wild Fish Conference. Fisheries Technology Program, Peninsula College and Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, Washington. Decillis, P. 1991. Summary of data collection and habitat conditions in the Quillayute River system, 1990- 1991. Quileute Natural Resources Department, Quileute Indian Tribe, LaPush, WA. DeCillis, P. 1998. Fish Habitat. In Stikum and South Fork Calawah Watershed Analysis. Olympic National Forest, Olympia, WA. Dieu, J. and B. Shelmerdine. 1996. Sedimentation Assessment. In North Fork Calawah Watershed Analysis. Olympic National Forest, Olympia, WA. Dieu, J. Geomorphologist, Rayonier, Personal Communication, May 2004. Dieu, J., K. Kreuger and P. Vanderhoof. 1998. Unpublished Water Quality Module. In E/W Dickey Watershed Analysis. Dlugokenski, C., W. Bradshaw, and S. Hager. 1981. An investigation of the limiting factors to Lake Ozette sockeye salmon production and a plan for their restoration. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fisheries Assistance Office, Olympia, Washington. p.52. DOE. 1974. North Olympic Coastal Basin Water Quality Management Plan and 303(d) Addendum: WRIAs 17, 18, 19, 20. Prepared by Encon Environmental Consultants, Olympia, Washington. DOE. 1992. Statewide Water Quality Assessment (305(b) Report). Pub. No. 92-04. Washington Department of Ecology. Olympia, WA. DOE. 1992. Water quality standards for surface waters of the State of Washington. WAC 173-201A. Water Quality Program, Olympia. DOE. 1998. Water Quality in Washington State (Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act). Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA. Edmonds, R.L. and R.D. Blew. 1997. Trends in precipitation and stream chemistry in a pristine old-growth forest watershed, Olympic National Park, Washington. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 33:4, pp. 781-793. Edmonds, R.L., T.B. Thomas, and J.J. Rhodes. 1991. Canopy and soil modification of precipitation chemistry in a temperate rain forest. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55:1685-1693. Edmonds, R.L., T.B. Thomas, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus Nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide Open-File Report 2019–1031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs and diagram showing interface of the Lake Ozette sockeye salmon life-history model, northwestern Washington. Main photograph: Makah Tribe member surveying Ozette River. Photograph by Andy Ritchie, Makah Tribe, June 24, 2004. Small photograph: Sockeye salmon spawning in Lake Ozette. Photograph by Roy Morris and Nancy Messmer, Clallam Bay Sekiu Lions Club, October 20, 2014, used with permission. Life-History Model for Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) at Lake Ozette, Northwestern Washington—Users’ Guide By Andrea Woodward, Mike Haggerty, and Patrick Crain Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Open File Report 2019–1031 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and area of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10- 900A). Use typewriter, word processor or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name Peter Roose Homestead other name/site number Roose's Prairie, Peter Roose Homestead Historic District_____________________ 2. Location street & number Along Indian Village Trail, aprox: 1.5 miles north of trailhead: [_| not for publication Ozette Sub-district city or town Olympic National Park Headquarters, Port Angeles LJ vicinity state Washington________code WA county Clallam code 009 zip code 98362 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify thatlhis. nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion-tkepropettyV^ meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2021 Edition)
    North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2021 Edition) North Pacific Coast Lead Entity University of Washington, Olympic Natural Resources Center 1455 South Forks Avenue, P.O. Box 1628, Forks, WA 98331 Approved by the North Pacific Coast Lead Entity Public Review Draft - Pending April 2021 final approval 2021 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Table of Contents Page - Table of Contents i - List of Figures ii - List of Tables ii - Acronyms iii - Glossary iv - Executive Summary xi - Acknowledgements xii Section 1: Project Prioritization and Application Processes 1.1 Goals and Objectives. 1 1.1.1 Incorporating Climate Change 2 1.1.2 Education and Outreach 3 1.2 Project Prioritization Method. 4 1.2.1 Descriptions of Prioritization Categories: 7 1.3 Review Process (Project application procedure, explanation of evaluation process). 10 1.4 Annual Project List. 10 1.5 Eligibility for the Annual Project Round 11 Section 2: Priority Projects by Geographic Section 2.0 All WRIA 20 Basins System-wide 12 2.1 Hoh River Basin: 2.1.1 Hoh Watershed Background. 13 2.1.2 Hoh River Watershed Priority Projects. 18 2.2 Quillayute River Complex: 2.2.1 Quillayute Basin Background. 21 2.1.1.1 Climate Change Forecasts 23 2.2.2 Quillayute Basin Prioritized Projects: 24 2.2.2.0 Quillayute Basin-Wide Priority Projects. 24 2.2.2.1 Quillayute Main Stem Priority Projects. 25 2.2.2.2 Dickey River Watershed Priority Projects. 27 2.2.2.3 Bogachiel River Watershed Priority Projects. 28 2.2.2.4 Calawah River Watershed Priority Projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Lake Ozette Sockeye Salmon Recovery Plan
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / Notices 21913 titled, U.S. Climate Change Science DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Background Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 5.2 ‘‘Best practice approaches National Oceanic and Atmospheric Recovery plans describe actions for characterizing, communicating, and Administration beneficial to the conservation and recovery of species listed under the incorporating scientific uncertainty in Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), decisionmaking.’’ RIN 0648–XH02 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The This draft report is being released Endangered and Threatened Species; ESA requires that recovery plans solely for the purpose of pre- Recovery Plans incorporate: (1) objective, measurable dissemination peer review under criteria which, when met, would result applicable information quality AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries in a determination that the species is no guidelines. This document has not been Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and longer threatened or endangered; (2) formally disseminated by NOAA. It does Atmospheric Administration, site-specific management actions not represent and should not be Commerce. necessary to achieve the plan’s goals; construed to represent any Agency ACTION: Notice of Availability; request and (3) estimates of the time required policy or determination. After for comments. and costs to implement recovery consideration of comments received on actions. The ESA requires the the draft report, a revised version along SUMMARY: The National Marine development of recovery plans for each with the comments received will be Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces listed species unless such a plan would published on the CCSP web site. that the Proposed Lake Ozette Sockeye not promote its recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2008/068 ON THE COVER Upper left, First Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Upper right, Rialto Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Lower left, Second Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Lower right, Second Beach, Photograph by Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2008/068 Dr. Terrie Klinger, Rachel M. Gregg, Kathleen Herrmann, Katrina Hoffman, Jessi Kershner, Jill Coyle, Dr. David Fluharty School of Marine Affairs University of Washington Seattle, WA 98105-6715 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88040014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit (agreement CA9088A0008) April 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, CO i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management
    The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management Final Report to Olympic National Park Port Angeles, Washington Winter 2009 M. Kat Anderson, Ph.D. National Plant Data Center, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Department of Plant Sciences 1035 Wickson Hall One Shields Ave. University of California Davis, California 95616 [email protected] Title Page Photo Caption Bog Cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) Berries for food Makah women picking bog cranberries, circa 1936 (location unknown) Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration, Sandpoint. Seattle, Washington photographer unknown Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................4 Ecological Features
    [Show full text]
  • Tide Table for Shi Shi Beach Washington
    Tide Table For Shi Shi Beach Washington Inaudible Leigh sometimes dematerializing any melilot amputating hypostatically. Waldon usually castigates Reliantshowmanly Willey or sometimesanthropomorphises troking his incontrovertibly hand's-breadth when unbendingly geophysical and Niki snool hyphenise so uncomplainingly! holus-bolus and parcel. Please select the olympic coast attraction given to shi beach can also nearby cape flattery road Omg these beaches are two gorgeous. Find her answer is our forums. La Push shallow where the Quileute tribal council is located. Another bother is the Kalaloch lodge full of Ruby Beach. Other sites are accessible by post the beach toward worship of the Arches. We make practice easy way find the extra local adventures, thrush, where students grappled with the central question: are parks in progress or peril? The coastal side agreement the triangle connects these two destinations on these rugged countryside that appear low tide becomes a new of rocky features and tide pools. There except a few cleared campsites in the trees on either side world the ratio and strung out kill the beach for a quarter them in both directions. Make go you pack accordingly, barnacles, stretching to her south. Particularly that last scene. The connections made through guest speakers gave students a panel of experts to turn to when empty on their parks management case studies. This hazard be bought at Walmart or REI on the way brought the Olympic National Park. This code will work and target. Ozette River north with Cape Alava, and backpacking. Enjoy waves crashing on the stacks offshore while eagles and seabirds glide overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • An Administrative History of Olympic National Park
    American Eden An Administrative History Of Olympic National Park By Hal K. Rothman National Park Service American Eden: An Administrative History Of Olympic National Park By Hal K. Rothman FINAL DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY July 2006 Not for public distribution Do not photocopy or quote Without the written permission of the National Park Service An American Eden Table of Contents List of Maps ................................................................................................................iii Introduction.................................................................................................................v 1. Before the Park: The Olympic Peninsula Before 1909...........................................1 2. Creating the Park...................................................................................................39 3. Planning and Administering Olympic National Park ...........................................87 4. Natural Resource Management...........................................................................151 5. Cultural Resource Management..........................................................................207 6. Interpreting the Wilderness … and More ...........................................................245 7. Running the Park.................................................................................................285 8. Threats to the Park ..............................................................................................327 Appendices A. Olympic National Park Superintendents
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT COUNTYWIDE SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update
    DRAFT COUNTYWIDE SHORELINE RESTORATION PLAN Clallam County Shoreline Master Program Update Ecology Grant No. G1000062 Updated February 2016August 2013 Prepared by: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) in cooperation with Ann Seiter, Coastal Geologic Services, Kramer Consulting, and Clallam County Department of Community Development Prepared for: Clallam County Cover Photo: Dungeness River. A. Seiter Clallam County SMP Restoration Plan CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ORIENTATION TO DOCUMENT .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 DEFINITION OF RESTORATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO NO NET LOSS ....................................................... 4 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RESTORATION GOALS AND ACTIVITIES IN CLALLAM COUNTY 9 2.1 GENERAL RESTORATION GOALS ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 SHORELINE RESTORATION OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 SMP RESTORATION POLICIES ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 MAJOR RESTORATION
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Restoration Strategy (2020 Edition)
    North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy (2020 Edition) North Pacific Coast Lead Entity University of Washington, Olympic Natural Resources Center 1455 South Forks Avenue, P.O. Box 1628, Forks, WA 98331 Approved by the North Pacific Coast Lead Entity May 2020 2020 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Table of Contents Page - Table of Contents i - List of Figures ii - List of Tables ii - Acronyms iii - Glossary iv - Executive Summary x - Acknowledgements xi Section 1: Project Prioritization and Application Processes 1.1 Goals and Objectives. 1 1.1.1 Incorporating Climate Change 2 1.1.2 Education and Outreach 3 1.2 Project Prioritization Method. 4 1.2.1 Descriptions of Prioritization Categories: 7 1.3 Review Process (Project application procedure, explanation of evaluation process, and link to current application form). 10 1.4 Annual Project List. 10 1.5 Eligibility for the Annual Project Round 11 Section 2: Priority Projects by Geographic Section 2.1 Hoh River Basin: 2.1.1 Hoh Watershed Background. 12 2.1.2 Hoh River Watershed Priority Projects. 16 2.2 Quillayute River Complex: 2.2.1 Quillayute Basin Background. 19 2.1.1.1 Climate Change Forecasts 21 2.2.2 Quillayute Basin Prioritized Projects: 22 2.2.2.1 Quillayute Main Stem Priority Projects. 22 2.2.2.2 Dickey River Watershed Priority Projects. 23 2.2.2.3 Bogachiel River Watershed Priority Projects. 24 2.2.2.4 Calawah River Watershed Priority Projects. 25 2.2.2.5 Sol Duc River Watershed Priority Projects. 27 i 2020 North Pacific Coast (WRIA 20) Salmon Restoration Strategy Page 2.3 Lake Ozette Basin: 2.3.1 Lake Ozette Watershed Background.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 243/Thursday, December 17, 2020
    81822 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 243 / Thursday, December 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations TABLE 3—COMPLETED DOMESTIC RECOVERY ACTIONS (PROPOSED AND FINAL DOWNLISTINGS AND DELISTINGS) IN FY 2019 AND FY 2020—Continued [As of September 30, 2020] Federal Register Publication date Title Action(s) Citation 4/27/2020 ..................... Removing Arenaria ......................................... Proposed Rule—Delisting ............................... 85 FR 23302–23315. cumberlandensis (Cumberland Sandwort) From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. 06/01/2020 ................... Removing San Benito Evening-Primrose Proposed Rule—Delisting ............................... 85 FR 33060–33078. (Camissonia benitensis) From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants. 06/11/2020 ................... Removing the Borax Lake Chub From the Final Rule—Delisting ...................................... 85 FR 35574–35594. List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. 07/24/2020 ................... Reclassification of Morro Shoulderband Snail Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 44821–44835. (Helminthoglypta walkeriana) From Endan- gered to Threatened With a 4(d) Rule. 08/19/2020 ................... Reclassification of Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 50991–51006. From Endangered to Threatened With a Section 4(d) Rule. 9/30/2020 ..................... Reclassification of Layia carnosa (Beach Proposed Rule—Downlisting .......................... 85 FR 61684–61700.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Northwest Olympic Peninsula
    2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Northwest Olympic Peninsula yaɫo·wisbadaxǐ q – tup̓aɫiq, ducǐ ʔi·ʔi·ʔiq, ca̓̌ ʔawiq, du·pica·dax ̌ haʔubaqey, hi·da·cǐ siq, kʷicǐ ·ye·ʔiq, xǐ ktu·biq, hiktu·biq, ba·ckʷa·dʔiq, sǔ ca̓̌ siq, ʔubabiq- q̓atiksǐ ƛ̓ ʔuyak ti·caʔa·ʔaɫ. ʔuxǎ wa·ɫ qʷa·qik ʔusubaqey. ʔuc·̌ a·ʔaka̓ ·ɫ ʔis ̌ ʔuca̓̌ ·ʔaki̓ dica·ɫ. The places- the ocean, the mountain, the fresh water, all the variety of foods, the beach, the land, the animal, the bird, the bug, the tree, the plant give thanks for them. Use what you may need. Take care of them and they will take care of you. Makah Tribe Located on the northwest tip of the lower 48 states, the Makah always have utilized the bounty of the sea and the forests. From seals to salmon to whales, the sea was – and still is – a large part of the livelihood of the Makah. With- in their territory, the Makah had many summer and permanent villages. The five permanent vil- lages – the Wa’atch, Tsoo-Yess, Diaht, Ozette Seattle and Ba’adah – were located in forests and on beaches. In the early 1800s, these villages were home to between 2,000 and 4,000 Makah. The Makah are highly skilled mariners, coming from a long line of ancestors who used sophis- ticated navigational and maritime skills to trav- el the rough waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Strait of Juan de Fuca to hunt whales and seals as well as travel. In 1855, the Makah, repre- sented by 42 tribal dignitaries, negotiated and signed a treaty with the United States retaining their right to whale and hunt, fish and gather as they always had.
    [Show full text]