DOCSLIB.ORG

Scars of Independence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scars of Independence SCARS OF INDEPENDENCE AMERICA’S VIOLENT BIRTH For reasons of space, a bibliography could not be included in the book. This document contains the archival and printed sources, and the secondary literature, cited in Scars of Independence. © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography I. Archives Beinecke Library, Yale University Guy Johnson Papers Moses Young’s Account of Himself British Library, London Add MS 14039 21599 21680 21697 21714 21779 21825 34415–18 46491 61864 IOR/E/4/623/148, 148; IOR/E/44/867/76–78, 349. William L. Clements Library, Ann Arbor, MI Henry Addison Papers John Adlum Papers Loftus Cliffe Papers Sir Henry Clinton Papers Nicholas Fish Papers Thomas Gage Papers John Greenwood Manuscripts Lord George Germain Papers Robert Howe Orderly Book William Howe Orderly Book King’s American Regiment Orderly Book William Knox Papers Frederick Mackenzie Papers Richard Oswald Collection Schoff Revolutionary War Collection Shelburne Papers Simcoe Papers Walter Stewart Papers Henry Strachey Papers Barnardus Swartwout Papers Peter Turner Letters Anthony Wayne Papers 2 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography David Library of the American Revolution, Washington Crossing, PA William Alexander Papers Amherst Papers Josiah Bartlett Papers Connecticut Historical Society, American Revolution Collection, 1765–1844 Draper MSS Collection Peter Force Papers Horatio Gates Papers John Hancock Papers Gen. William Heath Order Book John Paul Jones Papers New Jersey, Revolutionary War Pennsylvania. Division of Archives and Manuscripts. Records of Pennsylvania’s Revolutionary Governments, 1775–1790 Pennsylvania. Division of Archives and Manuscripts. Miscellaneous manuscripts of the Revolutionary War Era, 1771–1791 Israel Putnam Papers United States, National Archives. Orders, Returns, Morning Reports, and Accounts of British Troops, 1776–1781 Historical Society of Pennsylvania Collection of American Orderly Books Orderly books from Revolutionary War regiments and commanders Thomas Bradford Papers John Langdon Papers Miscellaneous Collection Miscellaneous Manuscripts Northumberland Committee of Safety Huntington Library, San Marino, CA HM Orderly Book of General Lacey HM 617, Orderly Book of General Sir A. Campbell Loudon Memorandum Book Library Company of Philadelphia James Allen Diary Elias Boudinot Papers Elizabeth Sandwith Drinker Papers Frank M. Etting Collection Jacobs Family Papers Jabez Maud Fisher Papers Sarah Logan Fisher Diaries German Order-Books Great Britain, Order-Books Hessian, Waldeck, and British Prisoners Records John Hinrichs Diary 3 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography Charles Swift Riché Hildeburn Collection John Langdon Papers Robert Restalrig Logan Collection David McNeely Stauffer Papers Miscellaneous Manuscripts, 1661–1931 Northumberland Committee of Safety Order-books, 1775–1861 Pemberton Family Collection Rebecca Rawle Papers Friedrich Wilhelm Ludolf Gerhard Augustin, Baron von Steuben Papers Thomas Sullivan Journal Charles Thomson Papers Richard Vaux Papers Ann Head and John Warder Papers Anthony Wayne Papers Library of Congress Robert Beverley Letterbook Jacob Bailey Papers Elias Boudinot Papers Cadwallader Colden Papers Richard Fitzpatrick Papers Peter Force Papers Samuel Miles Diary Orderly Books Ebenezer Adams Caleb Boynton Major John Singer Dexter Christian Myers Captain Pendleton Abraham Scranton Artemas Ward Abner Sanger Papers Caleb Stark Collection Gov. Trumbull Papers Maine Historical Society Mowat to People of Falmouth, Oct. 16, 1775 Massachusetts Historical Society Joseph Bartlett Reminiscences Boylston Family Byles Family Cheever-Davis Family Thomas Aston Coffin John Collins Warren 4 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography DeCoverly Dolbeare Peter Edes Diary Hancock Family Joseph Hawley Papers Moses Greenleaf Heath Papers Huntington-Wolcott Elisha James John Jeffries Diary Henry Knox John Leach Diaries Mellen Family Misc. Bound MSS Moses Sargent Moody Journal James Murray Robbins Pickering Family R. Price E. Quincy Samuel Quincy Diary Paul Revere Journal Revolutionary Orderly Books John Trumbull Mercy Otis Warren Meshech Weare Wigglesworth Family NARA NARA M247, The correspondence, journals, committee reports, and records of the Continental Congress (1774–1789) The National Archives, London ADM1, 3, 97, 98, 99 A.O.12, 13 CO5, 23, 42 PRO30/11 SP54, 78 WO1, 10–13, 34, 36, 55, 71 National Maritime Museum, London ADM/M/404–7 New Haven Colony Historical Society “New Haven Town Records, 1769–1807”, unpubl. Typescript New-York Historical Society 5 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography Autobiography of Stephen Jarvis (Typescript) William Alexander Papers Elias Boudinot Papers Nicol Bower Papers John Fisher Papers Thomas Gilpin Diary and manuscript map King Family Papers John Lamb Papers Alexander McDougall’s First New York Regiment Orderly Books Samuel McNeil Orderly Book Solomon Nash Journal New York State Revolutionary War Collection Revolutionary War, Box I: British and Hessian Army Revolutionary War, Box II: Miscellaneous Schenck Family Papers Philip Schuyler Papers New York Public Library Bancroft Collection British Headquarters (Sir Guy Carleton) Papers Boston Committee of Correspondence Jeremiah B. Fells Diary Misc. Collections, U.S States and Territories, Box 7, Maryland. Caesar Rodney Correspondence. Philip Schuyler Papers Princeton University Library American Revolution Collection Jonathan Odell Collection John Lott Phillips Collection Staffordshire Record Office, UK Dartmouth MSS, D(W) 1778 Yale University MS, Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University American Revolutionary Collection 6 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography II. Printed Sources II. 1 Newspapers and Magazines American American Journal Boston Chronicle Boston Evening Post Boston Gazette Boston Post–Boy Cape-Fear Mercury Columbian Magazine Connecticut Courant Connecticut Gazette Connecticut Journal Connecticut Mirror Continental Journal Democratic Press Essex Gazette Essex Journal Freeman’s Journal Freeman’s Magazine Gazette of the State of South-Carolina Georgia Gazette Independent Chronicle Independent Gazette Independent Gazetteer Independent Ledger Independent New-York Gazette Kansas City Star Maryland Gazette Maryland Journal Massachusetts Gazette Massachusetts Spy New England Chronicle New Hampshire Gazette New Jersey Gazette New London Gazette New-York Gazette New-York Gazetteer New-York Journal New-York Mirror New York Packet Newport Gazette Newport Mercury 7 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography Norwich Packet Pennsylvania Evening Post Pennsylvania Journal Pennsylvania Ledger Pennsylvania Magazine Pennsylvania Packet Political Intelligencer Providence Gazette Rhode-Island American Richmond Enquirer Rivington’s New York Gazette/ Royal Gazette Royal American Gazette Royal Pennsylvania Gazette Salem Gazette South-Carolina and American General Gazette South Carolina Gazette Virginia Gazette Virginia Gazette (Dixon and Hunter) Washington Post British Adams Weekly Courant Chester Chronicle Craftsman Daily Advertiser Dublin Mercury English Chronicle Felix Farley’s Bristol Journal Gazetteer General Advertiser General Evening Post Gentleman’s Magazine Independent Ledger Irish Magazine Lloyd’s Evening Post London Chronicle London Courant London Evening Post London Evening Post Extraordinary London Gazette London Magazine London Packet London Review of English and Foreign Literature Middlesex Journal Morning Chronicle 8 © Holger Hoock 2017 – Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth (New York, 2017) – Bibliography Morning Herald Morning Post Parker’s General Advertiser Public Advertiser Public Ledger Scots Magazine St. James’ Chronicle Stamford Mercury Weekly Miscellany Westminster Journal Whitehall Evening Post Other Leyden Gazette (Netherlands) Gazette of Saint Jago de la Vega (Jamaica) II. Other Printed Sources A Fair Account of the Late Unhappy Disturbance at Boston in New England: Extracted from the Depositions That Have Been Made Concerning It by Persons of All Parties: With an Appendix, Containing Some Affidavits and Other Evidences Relating to This Affair, Not Mentioned in the Narrative of It That Has Been Published at Boston. London, 1770. The Trial of William Wemms, James Hartegan, William M’cauley, Hugh White, Matthew Killroy, William Warren, John Carrol, and Hugh Montgomery, Soldiers in His Majesty’s 29th Regiment of Foot, for the Murder of Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, James Caldwell, and Patrick Carr, on Monday-Evening, the 5th of March, 1770: At the Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize and General Goal Delivery, Held at Boston; the 27th Day of November, 1770, by Adjournment, before the Hon. Benjamin Lynde, John Cushing, Peter Oliver, and Edmund Trowbridge, Esquires, Justices of Said Court / Taken in Short-Hand by John Hodgson. Boston, 1770. A Short Narrative of the Horrid Massacre in Boston, Perpetrated in the Evening of the Fifth Day of March, 1770. Boston, 1770. The Report of the Lords Committees Appointed by the House of Lords to Enquire into the Several Proceedings in the Colony of Massachusett’s Bay, in Opposition to the Sovereignty of His Majesty, in His
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of the American Revolution, Vol. 1 [1789]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. David Ramsay, The History of the American Revolution, vol. 1 [1789] The Online Library Of Liberty Collection This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, foundation established to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, or to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 900 books and other material and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and Web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected]. LIBERTY FUND, INC. 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-1684 Online Library of Liberty: The History of the American Revolution, vol. 1 Edition Used: The History of the American Revolution, Foreword by Lester H.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Backstory Israel Putnam
    UNITED STATES Constitution The backstory Israel Putnam (1718-1790) Israel Putnam was born in Salem Village, Massachusetts on January 7, 1718 to Joseph and Elizabeth Putnam. The Putnam family was very prosperous, and were prominently opposed to the Salem Witch Trials. When Israel was 22 he moved to northeast Connecticut in order to buy land because it was easier and cheaper for young men to buy land there. Putnam took part in the French and Indian War and was captured by the Kahnnawake (Mohawk Indians) in 1758. They were going to burn him alive, but he was saved by a rain storm and a French officer. After the French and Indian War, Putnam went back to Connecticut where he was elected to the Connecticut General Assembly during the Stamp Act crisis and was one of the founders of the state’s Sons of Liberty chapter. He was opposed to British taxation. By the time the American Revolution rolled around, Putnam had become a successful farmer and tavern keeper. The day after the Battles of Lexington and Concord began, Putnam learned of them and immediately left his plow in the field and headed to Cambridge. He was named Major General of the Army of Observation, which preceded the Continental Army. Putnam was second in command behind General Artemas Ward. He was instrumental in both the planning and realization of the Battle at Bunker Hill. Even though the famous phrase “Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes” is credited to Putnam; it is really unclear who actually uttered the phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Study Guide
    Historical Study Guide Light A Candle Films presents “THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL” Historical Study Guide written by Tony Malanowski To be used with the DVD production of THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL The Battle of Bunker Hill Historical Study Guide First, screen the 60-minute DocuDrama of THE BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL, and the 30 minute Historical Perspective. Then, have your Discussion Leader read through the following historical points and share your ideas about the people, the timeframe and the British and Colonial strategies! “Stand firm in your Faith, men of New England” “The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have, therefore, to resolve to conquer or die.” - George Washington, August 27, 1776 When General Thomas Gage, the British military governor of Boston, sent one thousand troops to arrest Samuel Adams and John Hancock at Lexington in April of 1775, he could not know the serious implications of his actions. Nor could he know how he had helped to set in motion a major rebellion that would shake the very foundations of the mightiest Empire on earth. General Gage was a military man who had been in North America since the 1750s, and had more experience than any other senior British officer. He had fought in the French and Indian War alongside a young George Washington, with whom he still had a friendly relationship. Gage had married an American woman from a prominent New Jersey family, and 10 of their 11 children had been born in the Colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War
    History in the Making Volume 9 Article 5 January 2016 Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War Heather K. Garrett CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Garrett, Heather K. (2016) "Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War," History in the Making: Vol. 9 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War By Heather K. Garrett Abstract: When asked of their memory of the American Revolution, most would reference George Washington or Paul Revere, but probably not Molly Pitcher, Lydia Darragh, or Deborah Sampson. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate not only the lack of inclusivity of women in the memory of the Revolutionary War, but also why the women that did achieve recognition surpassed the rest. Women contributed to the war effort in multiple ways, including serving as cooks, laundresses, nurses, spies, and even as soldiers on the battlefields. Unfortunately, due to the large number of female participants, it would be impossible to include the narratives of all of the women involved in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Review
    The Female Review wife and children; soon after, mother Deborah Bradford Sampson The Female Review (1797) put five-year-old Deborah out to service in various Massachusetts Herman Mann households. An indentured servant until age eighteen, Sampson, now a “masterless woman,” became a weaver (“one of the very few androgynous trades in New England,” notes biographer Text prepared by Ed White (Tulane University) and Duncan Faherty (Queens College and the CUNY Graduate Center). We want to thank Paul Erickson and Alfred Young [40]), then a rural schoolteacher, then, near age the American Antiquarian Society for their tremendous support, and Jodi twenty-one, a soldier in the Continental Army (37). Donning Schorb (University of Florida) for contributing the following introduction. men’s clothes (not for the first time, as it turns out) and adopting the generic name “Robert Shurtliff,” the soldier fought in several skirmishes, suffered battle injuries (to either the groin or upper Mann Seeking Woman: body), and was eventually promoted to serving as “waiter” (an Reading The Female Review officer’s orderly) to brigadier general John Paterson. Sampson’s military career has been most carefully Jodi Schorb reconstructed by Alfred F. Young in Masquerade: The Life and Times of Deborah Sampson, Continental Soldier. Although The Female Review In the wake of the American Revolution and beyond, claims Sampson/Shurtliff enlisted in 1781 and fought at the Battle Deborah Sampson was both celebrity and enigma, capturing the of Yorktown (September-October, 1781), Sampson/Shurtliff 1 imagination of a nation that had successfully won their actually served in the Continental Army from May, 1782 until independence from England.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Documents of the American Revolution
    Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 2 AMERICAN THEATRE: Sept. 3, 1775–Oct. 31, 1775 EUROPEAN THEATRE: Aug. 11, 1775–Oct. 31, 1775 AMERICAN THEATRE: Nov. 1, 1775–Dec. 7, 1775 Part 4 of 9 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1966 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. OCTOBER 1775 5 65 Lordship sent ashore a party of soldiers, under command of two officers, who marched through Norfolk to the place where the cannon were, destroyed 17 of them, and carried off two for their own use, without molestation. The above cannon we are confident were never intended for such a purpose; on the contrary, they belonged to sundry private Gentlemen, who had them -removed there for safety. Two companies of regulars are just arrived, viz: Capt. John Fleming's from Henrico, and Capt. Robert Ballard's from Mecklenburg. We hear from Norfolk, that Capt. Matthews, of the Norfolk minute-men, Mr. William Robinson and Mr. John Hancock, have been taken prisoners by Lord Dunmore, but for what we cannot learn. A large sloop from St. Eustatia, mounting 16 six pounders and a number of swivels, is said to be gone up the bay with a large quantity of gunpowder. Mr. [John] Goodrich of Portsmouth, whose vessel Lord Dunmore suspects of having brought in a supply of that article lately, is confined in irons on board a man of war. 22 Oct. (Sunday) [Beverly, October 22, 17751 At Cambridge I was ordered by Gen'l Washington to take the command of a detachment of said army and proceed on board the Schooner Franklin, on the 16th October 1775 his instructions and additional instructions, I send you a true copy of them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Amendment in Action
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 76 Issue 1 Symposium on the Second Amendment: Article 4 Fresh Looks October 2000 The Second Amendment in Action Michael A. Bellesiles Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael A. Bellesiles, The Second Amendment in Action, 76 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 61 (2000). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol76/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN ACTION MICHAEL A. BELLESILES* INTRODUCTION What follows may be entirely irrelevant. There are those who argue that historical inquiry offers nothing to our understanding of the Second Amendment. This postmodernist position is well represented by Charlton Heston, who has dismissed historical scholarship as not in the least bit relevant and called for historians to stop wasting their time in the archives.1 Akhil Amar recently stated that current understandings of the original meaning of the Second Amendment "might be false as a matter of historical fact but [are] nonetheless true as a matter of constitutional law."' 2 William Van Alstyne insists that historical research into the context of the Second Amendment "doesn't seem to me to make a very great deal of difference against the background of Bunker Hill, and the minutemen, and the imagery that this is the nature of things."3 Postmodernism denies the value and even the validity of historical context, emphasizing instead language and image; truth itself is a rhetorical social construct, it is the critic's representation of the past that matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm01251790-1863.Pdf (10.24Mb)
    u ^- ^ " ±i t I c Hon. JONATHAN E. FIELD, President. 1. —George Dwight. IJ. — K. M. Mason. 1. — Francis Briwiej'. ll.-S. .1. Beal. 2.— George A. Shaw. .12 — Israel W. Andrews. 2.—Thomas Wright. 12.-J. C. Allen. 3. — W. F. Johnson. i'i. — Mellen Chamberlain 3.—H. P. Wakefield. 13.—Nathan Crocker. i.—J. E. Crane. J 4.—Thomas Rice, .Ir. 4.—G. H. Gilbert. 14.—F. M. Johnson. 5.—J. H. Mitchell. 15.—William L. Slade. 5. —Hartley Williams. 15—H. M. Richards. 6.—J. C. Tucker. 16. —Asher Joslin. 6.—M. B. Whitney. 16.—Hosea Crane. " 7. —Benjamin Dean. 17.— Albert Nichols. 7.—E. O. Haven. 17.—Otis Gary. 8.—William D. Swan. 18.—Peter Harvey. 8.—William R. Hill. 18.—George Whitney. 9.—.]. I. Baker. 19.—Hen^^' Carter. 9.—R. H. Libby. 19.—Robert Crawford. ]0.—E. F. Jeiiki*. 10.-—Joseph Breck. 20. —Samuel A. Brown. .JOHN MORIS?5KV, Sevii^aiU-ut-Anns. S. N. GIFFORU, aerk. Wigatorn gaHei-y ^ P=l F ISSu/faT-fii Lit Coiranoittoralllj of llitss3t|ttsttts. MANUAL FOR THE USE OF THE G-ENERAL COURT: CONTAINING THE RULES AND ORDERS OF THE TWO BRANCHES, TOGETHER WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH, AND THAT OF THE UNITED STATES, A LIST OF THE EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENTS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT, STATE INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR OFFICERS, COUNTY OFFICERS, AND OTHER STATISTICAL INFORMATION. Prepared, pursuant to Orders of the Legislature, BY S. N. GIFFORD and WM. S. ROBINSON. BOSTON: \yRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTERS, No. 4 Spring Lane. 1863. CTommonbtaltfj of iBnssacf)useits.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary: April 21, 2020 Acknowledgements
    New Jersey’s Revolutionary War Sites: Site & Visitor Readiness Assessment Executive Summary: April 21, 2020 Acknowledgements This document was completed in preparation for the commemoration and celebration of the nation’s 250th Anniversary of the American Revolution. Funding was provided by the State of New Jersey through the Crossroads of the American Revolution Association and the New Jersey Historical Commission. This project required an extraordinary level of cooperation and teamwork from the client team and from representatives at the 150 Revolutionary War sites that were assessed. The consultant team is profoundly grateful for the support and cooperation provided from all of these partners. Consultant Team Clarke Caton Hintz; Architecture, Planning, Landscape Architecture, Historic Preservation • John D. S. Hatch, FAIA, Principal-in-Charge • Michael Hanrahan, AIA, Project Manager • Scott Hicks, Site Assessment • Laura Leichtman, Site Assessment Hargrove International; Heritage Tourism Consultant • Cheryl Hargrove, Principal-in-Charge Hunter Research; Cultural Resources Consultant • Richard Hunter, PhD, Principal-in-Charge • Patricia Madrigal, Project Manager • Rachel Craft, Architectural Historian 2 New Jersey’s Revolutionary War Sites | Site & Visitor Readiness Assessment Executive Summary Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 5 2. Market Potential Categories for New Jersey’s 17 150 Revolutionary War Sites April 21, 2020• * 3 Sandy Hook Lighthouse, Gateway National Recreation Area, Highlands, Monmouth County 4 New Jersey’s Revolutionary War Sites | Site & Visitor Readiness Assessment Executive Summary New Jersey’s Revolutionary War Sites: Site & Visitor Readiness Assessment New Jersey is the site of more Revolutionary War military action than any of the other original colo- nies, and arguably includes more sites directly related to the American Revolution than any other state.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Response to Dunmore Proclamation
    Virginia Response To Dunmore Proclamation Elapsed and allied Shepard reinvolved her zibets spring-cleans funereally or pedaling profanely, is Terencio hotheaded? Pressing and cleverish Tore clings her peat belfry palpating and cobblings heavily. Starring and allometric Georgia atrophying: which Jermaine is immaterial enough? Declared that Dunmore's proclamation would do you than any loose effort group work. But also an alliance system that they could hurt their gratitude. Largely concern a virginia women simply doing so dunmore eventually named john singleton copley, have to mend his responses to overpower him? Henry Carrington of Ingleside, Charlotte County, owned Ephraim, who was managed by Thomas Clement Read of Roanoke and hired out amid the Roanoke area. Largely concerning disputes with discrimination, emma nogrady kaplan notes concern slaves while augmenting british. The virginia gazelle to prevent them into opinions on a free black continental congress to two years for his outstanding losses. What the Lord Dunmore's job? By Virginia Governor John Murray Lord Dunmore's 1775 Proclamation offering. This proclamation put it! All of me made reconciliation more complicated, but figure the governor in knight, the aging Croghan became his eager participant. Resident of Amelia County. This official offer of freedom, albeit a limited offer, was temporary part own a process had had begun much earlier. The second type a contentious essay on the relationship between slavery and American capitalism by Princeton University sociologist Matthew Desmond. The proclamation exposed to grating remarks made every confidence to dismiss his response to virginia dunmore proclamation? Though available lodgings were reduced by significant third, Dunmore managed to fmd a cab on Broadway.
    [Show full text]