DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles of Generative Phonology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles of Generative Phonology Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Principles of Generative Phonology [oimT, Jensen PRINCIPLES OF GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY AMSTERDAM STUDIES IN THE THEORY AND HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC SCIENCE General Editor E.F. KONRAD KOERNER (Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung, Berlin) Series IV - CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTIC THEORY Advisory Editorial Board Lyle Campbell (Christchurch, N.Z.); Sheila Embleton (Toronto) Brian D. Joseph (Columbus, Ohio); John E. Joseph (Edinburgh) Manfred Krifka (Berlin); E. Wyn Roberts (Vancouver, B.C.) Joseph C. Salmons (Madison, Wis.); Hans-Jiirgen Sasse (Koln) Volume 250 John T. Jensen Principles of Generative Phonology An introduction PRINCIPLES OF GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY AN INTRODUCTION JOHN T. JENSEN University of Ottawa JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM/PHILADELPHIA The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jensen, John T. (John Tillotson) Principles of generative phonology : an introduction / John T. Jensen. p. cm. -- (Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory, ISSN 0304-0763 ; v. 251-250) i. Grammar, Comparative and general--Phonology. 2. Generative grammar. I. Title. II. Series. P217.6.J46 2004 4i4--dc22 2004048608 ISBN 90 272 4762 5 (Eur.) /1 58811 513 5 (US) (Hb; alk. paper) ISBN 90 272 4767 6 (Eur.) /1 58811 562 3 (US) (Pb; alk. paper) © 2004 - John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Co. • P.O.Box 36224 • 1020 ME Amsterdam • The Netherlands John Benjamins North America • P.O.Box 27519 • Philadelphia PA 19118-0519 • USA Contents Preface ix Chapter 1 Phonetics 1 1.1 Articulatory phonetics 2 1.1.1 Consonants 4 1.1.1.1 Manner of articulation 4 1.1.1.2 Place of articulation 7 1.1.1.3 Glottal state 8 1.1.1.4 Airstream mechanisms 11 1.1.2 Vowels 12 1.1.2.1 Parameters of vowel articulation 12 1.1.2.2 Glides and diphthongs 15 1.1.3 Suprasegmentals 16 1.1.4 Broad and narrow transcription 16 1.2 Acoustic phonetics 17 1.3 Phonetic alphabets 26 1.3.1 ThelPA 27 1.3.2 Problems with the IPA 29 1.3.3 Compromise adopted in this book 30 1.4 Exercises 33 Chapter 2 Contrast and Distribution 37 2.1 Complementary distribution 37 2.2 Coincident distribution 44 2.3 Overlapping distribution 45 2.4 Pattern congruity 47 VI CONTENTS 2.5 Free variation 50 2.6 Phonological rules and notations 53 2.7 Common types of phonological processes 55 2.7.1 Assimilation 55 2.7.2 Dissimilation 55 2.7.3 Lenition 56 2.7.4 Fortition , 57 2.7.5 Insertions 57 2.7.6 Deletions 57 2.7.7 Lengthening 58 2.7.8 Compensatory lengthening 59 2.7.9 Shortening 59 2.8 Problems with phonemic analysis 60 2.8.1 Neutralization 60 2.8.2 Pattern congruity 63 2.9 Summary 64 2.10 Exercises 66 Chapter 3 Distinctive features 79 3.1 Features as smallest building blocks 79 3.2 Binary distinctions 79 3.3 Further vowel features 85 3.4 Major classes: major class features 89 3.5 Features of consonants 91 3.5.1 Voicing and aspiration 92 3.5.2 Manner of articulation 93 3.5.3 Place of articulation 95 3.6 Secondary articulation of consonants 99 3.7 Features for suprasegmentals 100 3.8 Redundancy and implications 100 3.9 Exercises 107 Chapter 4 Alternations 113 4.1 Alternations as phonology 113 4.2 Morphology 114 4.3 Russian devoicing 115 CONTENTS vn 4.4 More on phonological rules 119 4.5 ATR harmony 121 4.6 Spanish lenition; Fortition and nasal assimilation in Lumasaaba 125 4.7 Steps in phonological analysis 131 4.8 Writing up the analysis 133 4.9 Further rule writing conventions and abbreviatory devices 134 4.9.1 Curly braces 134 4.9.2 Parentheses 135 4.9.3 Greek letter variables 137 4.9.4 Angled bracket notation 139 4.9.5 Mirror image rules 142 4.9.6 Transformational rules 142 4.10 Exercises 144 Chapter 5 Rule order 153 5.1 Russian 153 5.2 Methodology: discovering rule order 158 5.3 Formulation of the ordered rule hypothesis 159 5.4 Iterative rules 161 5.5 Spanish r-sounds 167 5.6 Yawelmani 173 5.6.1 Vowel Shortening and Epenthesis 173 5.6.2 Vowel Harmony 176 5.6.3 Some additional rules 183 5.7 Rule ordering relationships 189 5.7.1 Feeding order 190 5.7.2 Bleeding order 190 5.7.3 Counterfeeding order 192 5.7.4 Counterbleeding order 194 5.7.5 Mutually bleeding order 194 5.7.6 Opacity 195 5.8 Exercises 196 Chapter 6 Abstractness 207 6.1 Phonetic representations 207 viii CONTENTS 6.2 The null hypothesis 207 6.3 Two levels of representation 209 6.4 The simplicity criterion 212 6.5 The naturalness condition 215 6.6 Degrees of abstractness in underlying representations 217 6.6.1 Concrete underlying representations 217 6.6.2 Underlying representation as one of the phonetic alternants 218 6.6.3 Morphemes with several alternations 219 6.6.4 More abstract underlying representations 222 6.6.5 Limits on abstractness 228 6.7 Corpus-external evidence 230 6.7.1 Speech errors 231 6.7.2 Second language acquisition 231 6.7.3 Writing systems 232 6.7.4 Language games 233 6.7.5 Poetry 237 6.7.6 Language change 246 6.7.7 Maori 252 6.8 Exercises 254 Chapter 7 Multilinear phonology 263 7.1 Autosegmental phonology 263 7.1.1 Tone 263 7.1.2 Vowel harmony 268 7.1.3 Stability 271 7.2 Metrical and prosodic phonology 272 7.2.1 Metrical syllable structure 273 7.2.2 Metrical stress 278 7.2.3 Higher metrical units 282 7.3 Underspecification 289 7.4 Lexical phonology 297 7.5 Exercises 305 References 309 Index 319 Preface Principles of Generative Phonology is intended as a basic, thorough intro­ duction to contemporary phonological theory and practice. While the theory is in a constant state of revision and refinement, it is not possible to appreci­ ate recent developments or follow the argumentation involved without a firm foundation in the theory of distinctive features, formal notations for phono­ logical rules, and the theory of rule ordering. In the first six chapters I have essentially followed the theory of SPE (Chomsky & Halle 1968) in discussing these concepts, with the exception that I use iterative rules rather than SP£'s simultaneous rule schemata for rules with multiple effects, as in vowel har­ mony. The first chapter is a review of phonetics. An understanding of phonetics is essential for the study of phonology. The reader unacquainted with phonet­ ics is advised to supplement this chapter with a textbook devoted to the sub­ ject, such as MacKay (1987). This chapter also introduces the phonetic sym­ bols used throughout the book, in that I do not strictly follow IPA conventions, for reasons detailed there. Chapter 2 discusses contrast and distribution, with emphasis on rules as the mechanism for describing distributions. The terms basic, underlying seg­ ment, and phoneme are used more or less interchangeably for the segment that appears in underlying representations at this stage, but problems with the con­ cept of a phoneme as a group of phonetically similar sounds in complementa­ ry distribution (or free variation) are also discussed. In anticipation of the dis­ cussion of distinctive features, the notion of pattern congruity is also intro­ duced here. Chapter 3 introduces distinctive features, natural classes, and redundancy. I have adopted strictly binary features, since there does not appear to be any consensus on a replacement set of unary or multivalued features or some com­ bination of these. For similar reasons I have excluded feature geometry, pre­ ferring standard unordered feature matrices as the clearest presentation of these concepts at this stage. X PREFACE Chapter 4 builds on the concept of rules from chapter 2, showing how rules of the same type account for phonological alternations, and introduces additional rule writing conventions. Chapter 5 demonstrates the use of ordering of rules to achieve maximum generalization, starting with examples of two or three rules and advancing to the nine rules of Yawelmani discussed in Kenstowicz & Kisseberth (1979). Chapter 6 discusses abstractness and the motivation for abstract underly­ ing representations, as well as the limitations on abstractness. Chapter 7 discusses some post-SPE developments, including autosegmen- tal phonology, metrical and prosodic phonology, underspecification theory, and lexical phonology. For a number of reasons I have decided not to include Optimality Theory, despite its current popularity. One reason is that it does not really fall under the head of principles of generative phonology, being something of a depar­ ture from these principles in rejecting derivations with ordered rules. Second, Optimality Theory has achieved far more success in morphology than in phonology. It has made significant headway in describing infixation and redu­ plication without resort to unconstrained morphological processes, but encounters difficulties in the description of the opaque phonological interac­ tions that occur constantly in languages and that are most convincingly treat­ ed in terms of ordered rules. In order to treat basic principles thoroughly I have thought it best to leave more advanced topics for others to tackle. Indeed there are a number of introductions to Optimality Theory that have recently become available, such as Archangeli & Langendoen (1997) and Kager (1999).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using 'North Wind and the Sun' Texts to Sample Phoneme Inventories
    Blowing in the wind: Using ‘North Wind and the Sun’ texts to sample phoneme inventories Louise Baird ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The Australian National University [email protected] Nicholas Evans ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The Australian National University [email protected] Simon J. Greenhill ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The Australian National University & Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History [email protected] Language documentation faces a persistent and pervasive problem: How much material is enough to represent a language fully? How much text would we need to sample the full phoneme inventory of a language? In the phonetic/phonemic domain, what proportion of the phoneme inventory can we expect to sample in a text of a given length? Answering these questions in a quantifiable way is tricky, but asking them is necessary. The cumulative col- lection of Illustrative Texts published in the Illustration series in this journal over more than four decades (mostly renditions of the ‘North Wind and the Sun’) gives us an ideal dataset for pursuing these questions. Here we investigate a tractable subset of the above questions, namely: What proportion of a language’s phoneme inventory do these texts enable us to recover, in the minimal sense of having at least one allophone of each phoneme? We find that, even with this low bar, only three languages (Modern Greek, Shipibo and the Treger dialect of Breton) attest all phonemes in these texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Grapheme-To-Phoneme Transcription in Hungarian
    International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications vol. 7, no. 1, 2016, pp. 161–173 Received 08/02/2016, accepted 07/03/2016, final 20/06/2016 ISSN 0976-0962, http://ijcla.bahripublications.com Grapheme-to-Phoneme Transcription in Hungarian ATTILA NOVÁK1 AND BORBÁLA SIKLÓSI2 1 MTA-PPKE Hungarian Language Technology Research Group, Hungary 2 Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary ABSTRACT A crucial component of text-to-speech systems is the one respon- sible for the transcription of the written text to its phonemic rep- resentation. although the complexity of the relation between the written and spoken form of languages varies, most languages have their regular and irregular phonological set of rules. In this paper, we present a system for the phonemic transcription of Hungarian. Beside the implementation of rules describing default letter-to-phoneme correspondences and morphophonological al- ternations, the tool incorporates the knowledge of a Hungarian morphological analyzer in order to be able to detect compound and other morpheme boundaries, and it contains a rich lexicon of entries with irregular pronunciation. It is shown that the system performs well even on texts containing a high number of foreign names. 1 INTRODUCTION In the research reported about in this study, our goal was to imple- ment a system that can automatically transform written Hungarian to its phonemic representation. The original intent of the system This is a pre-print version of the paper, before proper formatting and copyediting by the editorial staff. 162 ATTILA NOVÁK AND BORBÁLA SIKLÓSI was to transcribe a database of Hungarian geographic terms. How- ever, due to certain design decisions, our system proved to perform well also on texts containing a high ratio of foreign names and suf- fixed forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Voicing Assimilation, Final Devoicing, and the Problem of [V] (Or, the Mouse That Squeaked)*
    Russian voicing assimilation, final devoicing, and the problem of [v] (or, The mouse that squeaked)* Jaye Padgett - University of California, Santa Cruz "...the Standard Russian V...occupies an obviously intermediate position between the obstruents and the sonorants." Jakobson (1978) 1. Introduction Like the mouse that roared, the Russian consonant [v] has a status in phonology out of proportion to its size. Besides leaving a trail of special descriptive comments, this segment has played a key role in discussions about abstractness in phonology, about the manner in which long-distance spreading occurs, and about the the larger organization of phonology. This is largely because of the odd behavior of [v] with respect to final devoicing and voicing assimilation in Russian. Russian obstruents devoice word-finally, as in kniga 'book (nom. sg.) vs. knik (gen. pl.), and assimilate to the voicing of a following obstruent, gorodok 'town (nom. sg.)' vs. gorotka (gen. sg.). The role of [v] in this scenario is puzzling: like an obstruent, it devoices word-finally, krovi 'blood (gen. sg.)' vs. krofj (nom. sg.), and undergoes voicing assimilation, lavok 'bench (gen. pl.)' vs. lafka (nom. sg.). But like a sonorant, it does not trigger voicing assimilation: compare dverj 'door' and tverj 'Tver' (a town). As we will see, [v] behaves unusually in other ways as well. Why is Russian [v] special in this way? The best-known answer to this question posits that [v] is underlyingly /w/ and therefore behaves as a sonorant with respect to voicing assimilation (Lightner 1965, Daniels 1972, Coats and Harshenin 1971, Hayes 1984, Kiparsky 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Lexical Tone in Croatian
    The production of lexical tone in Croatian Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie im Fachbereich Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main vorgelegt von Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina aus Kiew 2018 (Einreichungsjahr) 2019 (Erscheinungsjahr) 1. Gutacher: Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 01.11.2018 ABSTRACT Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina: The production of lexical tone in Croatian (Under the direction of Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz and Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder) This dissertation is an investigation of pitch accent, or lexical tone, in standard Croatian. The first chapter presents an in-depth overview of the history of the Croatian language, its relationship to Serbo-Croatian, its dialect groups and pronunciation variants, and general phonology. The second chapter explains the difference between various types of prosodic prominence and describes systems of pitch accent in various languages from different parts of the world: Yucatec Maya, Lithuanian and Limburgian. Following is a detailed account of the history of tone in Serbo-Croatian and Croatian, the specifics of its tonal system, intonational phonology and finally, a review of the most prominent phonetic investigations of tone in that language. The focal point of this dissertation is a production experiment, in which ten native speakers of Croatian from the region of Slavonia were recorded. The material recorded included a diverse selection of monosyllabic, bisyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic words, containing all four accents of standard Croatian: short falling, long falling, short rising and long rising. Each target word was spoken in initial, medial and final positions of natural Croatian sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • [Paper on the Alignment of Low Postnuclear F0 Valleys in Dutch
    ALIGNMENT OF “PHRASE ACCENT” LOWS IN DUTCH FALLING-RISING QUESTIONS: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS Robin J. Lickley*, Astrid Schepman** and D. Robert Ladd*** *Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh **University of Abertay, Dundee *** Edinburgh University, Edinburgh Running Head: Dutch phrase accent lows Acknowledgements The research reported here was funded by the UK Economic and Research Council (ESRC) under grant no. R000-23-7447 to Edinburgh University, Principal Investigator D. R. Ladd. We are grateful to: Ellen Gurman Bard, for useful discussions about how to use the Map Task; Ineke Mennen for her help in devising sentences for the woon je in task; Andrew Ladd, for preparing new drawings for the Dutch maps; Carlos Gussenhoven, for providing access to the Nijmegen phonetics lab and its helpful staff, and for helping us to recruit speakers; Angela Vonk, for transcribing the Map Task corpus; Michael Bennett, Eddie Dubourg, Cedric Macmartin, and Stewart Smith, for much technical assistance in Edinburgh; the audience at the Colloquium of the British Association of Academic Phoneticians in Newcastle in March 2002, who made comments on a preliminary version of this paper; Francis Nolan and Vincent van Heuven, who read the paper as referees for Language and Speech and made many important suggestions for improvement; and above all our speakers, without whom there would have been nothing to study. Address for correspondence: Dr Robin J. Lickley, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh, EH12 8TS, Scotland, UK. Email: [email protected]. 2 Abstract In the first part of this study, we measured the alignment (relative to segmental landmarks) of the low F0 turning points between the accentual fall and the final boundary rise in short Dutch falling-rising questions of the form Do you live in [place name]? produced as read speech in a laboratory setting.
    [Show full text]
  • John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation
    Linguistic Society of America Review Reviewed Work(s): John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, 1551, 1569, 1570: Part II, Phonology by Bror Danielsson Review by: Morris Halle and Samuel Jay Keyser Source: Language, Vol. 43, No. 3, Part 1 (Sep., 1967), pp. 773-787 Published by: Linguistic Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/411817 Accessed: 12-06-2018 19:09 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Linguistic Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Language This content downloaded from 18.189.25.183 on Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:09:42 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms REVIEWS 773 --. 1938.1938. GriechischeGriechische Grammatik, Grammatik, erster erster Band. Band. Muinchen, Muinchen, C. H. C. Beck. H. Beck. THIEME, PAUL.PAUL. 1929. 1929. Das Das Plusquamperfektum Plusquamperfektum im imVeda. Veda. G6ttingen, G6ttingen, Vandenhoeck Vandenhoeck und und Ruprecht. --. 1938. Der Fremdling im 1Rgveda. Leipzig. --. 1957. Mitra and Aryaman. (Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 41.) New Haven, Yale University Press. WACKERNAGEL, JAKOB. 1926. Kleine Beitrige zur indischen Wortkunde, 2: pdlayati. Beitriige zur Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte Indiens, Festgabe Hermann Jacobi zum 75.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syntax of Phonology a Radically Substance-Free Approach Sylvia Blaho
    The syntax of phonology A radically substance-free approach Sylvia Blaho A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiæ Doctor University of Tromsø Faculty of Humanities Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics January 2008 Contents Acknowledgements v Abstract ix 1 Substance-free phonology 1 1.1 Initialassumptions ........................ 1 1.2 Variations on substance-free phonology . 8 1.2.1 TheConcordiaschool. 9 1.2.2 TheTorontoschool . 11 1.2.3 ElementTheory. .. .. 16 1.2.4 The Parallel Structures Model . 17 1.2.5 Radically substance-free phonology . 22 1.3 Formal issues in substance-free phonology . 24 1.3.1 Phoneticvariation . 24 1.3.2 PrivativityinOT . 26 1.3.3 Substance-freegeometry . 30 1.3.4 Geometryvs. binarity . 34 1.4 The architecture of substance-free phonology . .. 40 2 Substance-free OT 45 2.1 Ident[F] ............................. 45 2.2 *[F]................................. 52 2.3 Max[F] and Dep[F] ....................... 56 2.3.1 Esimbi........................... 61 2.4 Feature‘spreading’inOT . 63 2.5 Paradigmatic positional faithfulness . 71 2.5.1 The typological predictions of paradigmatic faithfulness 73 ii Contents 2.5.2 The role of paradigmatic faithfulness in shaping inven- tories............................ 84 3 Slovak voicing assimilation and sandhi voicing 117 3.1 Dataandgeneralisations . .117 3.2 Representations . .118 3.3 Analysis ..............................120 3.3.1 Voicing assimilation between obstruents . 120 3.3.2 Pre-pausedevoicing. .130 3.3.3 Pre-sonorantvoicing . .137 3.4 Summary .............................147 4 Hungarian voicing assimilation 149 4.1 Dataandgeneralisations . .150 4.2 Representations . .153 4.3 Analysis ..............................156 4.3.1 Theregularpattern. .156 4.3.2 /j/ .............................167 4.3.3 /h/ .............................182 4.4 Summary .............................192 Appendix A: tableaux including all constraints .
    [Show full text]
  • Lexical Phonology and the History of English
    LEXICAL PHONOLOGY AND THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH APRIL McMAHON Department of Linguistics University of Cambridge PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011±4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia # April McMahon 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Times 10/13pt. [ce] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data McMahon, April M. S. Lexical Phonology and the history of English / April McMahon. p. cm. ± (Cambridge studies in linguistics; 91) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0 521 47280 6 hardback 1. English language ± Phonology, Historical. 2. English language ± History. 3. Lexical Phonology. I. Title. II. Series. PE1133.M37 2000 421'.5 ± dc21 99±28845 CIP ISBN 0 521 47280 6 hardback Contents Acknowledgements page xi 1 The roÃle of history 1 1.1 Internal and external evidence 1 1.2 Lexical Phonology and its predecessor 5 1.3 Alternative models 13 1.4 The structure of the book 33 2 Constraining the model: current
    [Show full text]
  • The Processing of Reduced Word Pronunciation Variants by Natives and Foreign Language Learners
    The processing of reduced word pronunciaton variants by natves and learners Evidence from French casual speech Sophie Brand 6 511381-L-os-brand Processed on: 14-7-2017 The processing of reduced word pronunciation variants by natives and foreign language learners Evidence from French casual speech 2017, Sophie Brand ISBN: 978-90-76203-87-4 Cover image: Jolijn Ceelen Printed and bound by Ipskamp Drukkers b.v. The processing of reduced word pronunciation variants by natives and foreign language learners Evidence from French casual speech Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 27 september 2017 om 16.30 uur precies door Sophie Wijnanda Maria Brand geboren op 25 augustus 1985 te Roermond Promotor: Prof. dr. M.T.C. Ernestus Copromotor: Dr. E. Janse Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. R.W.N.M. van Hout Prof. dr. N. Warner (University of Arizona, Verenigde Staten) Dr. A. Bürki (Universität Potsdam, Duitsland) Prof. dr. H.M.G.M. Jacobs Dr. M.B.P. Starren The research reported in this dissertation was supported by a Consolidator grant from the European Research Council [grant number 284108] awarded to Prof. dr. M.T.C. Ernestus. ‘I don’t know what I may seem to the world, but, as to myself, I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the sea-shore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Tone Distribution— Typological Survey and Formal Analysis
    The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Tone Distribution— Typological Survey and Formal Analysis Jie Zhang For my family Table of Contents Acknowledgments xi 1 Background 3 1.1 Two Examples of Contour Tone Distribution 3 1.1.1 Contour Tones on Long Vowels Only 3 1.1.2 Contour Tones on Stressed Syllables Only 8 1.2 Questions Raised by the Examples 9 1.3 How This Work Evaluates The Different Predictions 11 1.3.1 A Survey of Contour Tone Distribution 11 1.3.2 Instrumental Case Studies 11 1.4 Putting Contour Tone Distribution in a Bigger Picture 13 1.4.1 Phonetically-Driven Phonology 13 1.4.2 Positional Prominence 14 1.4.3 Competing Approaches to Positional Prominence 16 1.5 Outline 20 2 The Phonetics of Contour Tones 23 2.1 Overview 23 2.2 The Importance of Sonority for Contour Tone Bearing 23 2.3 The Importance of Duration for Contour Tone Bearing 24 2.4 The Irrelevance of Onsets to Contour Tone Bearing 26 2.5 Local Conclusion 27 3 Empirical Predictions of Different Approaches 29 3.1 Overview 29 3.2 Defining CCONTOUR and Tonal Complexity 29 3.3 Phonological Factors That Influence Duration and Sonority of the Rime 32 3.4 Predictions of Contour Tone Distribution by Different Approaches 34 3.4.1 The Direct Approach 34 3.4.2 Contrast-Specific Positional Markedness 38 3.4.3 General-Purpose Positional Markedness 41 vii viii Table of Contents 3.4.4 The Moraic Approach 42 3.5 Local Conclusion 43 4 The Role of Contrast-Specific Phonetics in Contour Tone Distribution: A Survey 45 4.1 Overview of the Survey 45 4.2 Segmental Composition 48
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax Studies in Generative Grammar
    Marc van Oostendorp and Henk van Riemsdijk (Eds.) Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax Studies in Generative Grammar Editors Norbert Corver Harry van der Hulst Roumyana Pancheva Founding editors Jan Koster Henk van Riemsdijk Volume 124 Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax Edited by Marc van Oostendorp Henk van Riemsdijk ISBN 978-1-5015-1066-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-0222-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0225-5 ISSN 0167-4331 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. 6 2015 Walter de Gruyter, Inc., Berlin/Boston Typesetting: RoyalStandard, Hong Kong Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Contents Marc van Oostendorp and Henk van Riemsdijk Introduction 1 Josef Bayer Doubly-Filled Comp, wh head-movement, and derivational economy 7 Norbert Corver Interjections as structured root expressions 41 Günther Grewendorf The internal structure of wh-elements and the diversity of wh-movement 85 Jan Koster Relative clauses: Parallelism and partial reconstruction 115 Alan Langus and Marina Nespor On the nature of word order regularities 141 M. Rita Manzini On the substantive primitives of morphosyntax and their parametrization: Northern Italian subject clitics 167 Jacques Mehler Language acquisition and the neuroscience of development 195 Kuniya Nasukawa Recursion in the lexical structure of morphemes 211 Marc van Oostendorp Final devoicing in French 239 Markus A.
    [Show full text]
  • Eglė KRIVICKAITĖ PHONOTACTICS DEVELOPMENT of CHILDREN's
    VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Eglė KRIVICKAITĖ PHONOTACTICS DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN’S LANGUAGE Summary of Doctoral Dissertation Humanities, Philology (04 H) Kaunas, 2016 The dissertation has been prepared at Vytautas Magnus University in 2011– 2015. The right for the joint doctoral studies was accorded to Vytautas Magnus University, Klaipėda University, Šiauliai University and the Institute of the Lithuanian Language on July 8, 2011 according to the decree of the Minister of Education and Science of Lithuania No. V-1019. Scientific supervisor: prof. dr. Ineta Dabašinskienė (Vytautas Magnus University, Humanities, Philology – 04 H) The dissertation is defended in Philology Science Board of Vytautas Magnus University together with Klaipėda University, Šiauliai University and Lithuanian Language Institute: Chairperson: Prof. Dr. Asta Kazlauskienė (Vytautoas Magnus University, Humanities, Philology – 04H) Members: Prof. Habil. Dr. Bonifacas Stundžia (Vilnius University, Humanities, Philology – 04H) Prof. Dr. Dalia Pakalniškienė (Klaipėda University, Humanities, Philology – 04H) Prof. Dr. Genovaitė Kačiuškienė (Šiauliai University, Humanities, Philology – 04H) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė (Vytautas Magnus University, Humanities, Philology – 04H) The dissertation shall be defended in an open session of Philology Science Board on May 20, 2016 at 12 o‘clock at Vytautas Magnus University, room 211. Address: K. Donelaičio str. 52, 44244 Kaunas, Lithaunia The summary of the doctoral dissertation was sent out on April 19, 2016. The
    [Show full text]