DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Certification Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Certification Report Marine Stewardship Council Assessment VA-Delta Kamchatka Salmon Fisheries Public Certification Report September 2016 MRAG Americas, Inc. 10051 5th St N, Suite 105, St Petersburg, FL 33702, USA Raymond Beamesderfer Dr. Dmitry Lajus CLIENT DETAILS: Vityaz-Avto Co Ltd and Delta Co Ltd Kamchatka, Russia MSC reference standards: MSC Certification Requirements (CR) Version 2.0 CONTENTS 1 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS .......................................................................... 6 1.1 Assessment Team ........................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Peer Reviewers ............................................................................................................ 6 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY .................................................................................. 7 2.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ................................ 7 2.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) ........................................................ 7 2.1.2 Final UoC(s) ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 Total Allowable Catch and Catch Data ................................................................... 8 2.1.4 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Enhanced Fisheries ......................................... 9 2.1.5 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Introduced Species Based Fisheries (ISBF) ...... 9 2.2 Overview of the fishery ............................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Historical development of the Fishery ................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Fishing Methods .................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3 Organization & User Rights ................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Seasons .................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.5 Harvest .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ............................................................... 30 2.3.1 Pink Salmon ........................................................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Chum Salmon ........................................................................................................ 35 2.3.3 Coho Salmon ......................................................................................................... 40 2.3.4 Management ......................................................................................................... 44 2.3.5 Enhancement ........................................................................................................ 52 2.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background...................................................................... 53 2.4.1 Primary Species ..................................................................................................... 53 2.4.2 Secondary Species ................................................................................................. 62 2.4.3 ETP Species ............................................................................................................ 66 2.4.4 Habitats ................................................................................................................. 68 2.4.5 Ecosystem Structure and Function ........................................................................ 68 2.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .................................................. 69 2.5.1 Management Structure ......................................................................................... 70 2.5.2 Preseason Management ....................................................................................... 74 2.5.3 In-season process .................................................................................................. 78 2.5.4 Enforcement .......................................................................................................... 80 2.5.5 Protected, Endangered, or Threatened Species .................................................... 81 2.5.6 Environmental Protection ..................................................................................... 81 2.5.7 Research plan ........................................................................................................ 82 2.5.8 International Management ................................................................................... 83 3 EVALUATION PROCEDURE ..................................................................................... 84 3.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment .............................................................................. 84 3.2 Previous assessments ................................................................................................ 84 3.3 Assessment Methodologies ...................................................................................... 86 3.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ...................................................................... 86 4.1.1 Site Visits ............................................................................................................... 86 4.1.2 Consultations ......................................................................................................... 87 4.1.3 Evaluation Techniques........................................................................................... 87 4 TRACEABILITY ..................................................................................................... 88 VA-Delta Kamchatka Salmon Public Certification Report 2 4.1 Eligibility Date ............................................................................................................ 88 4.2 Traceability within the Fishery .................................................................................. 88 4.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ........................................................... 90 5 EVALUATION RESULTS .......................................................................................... 91 5.1 Principle Level Scores ................................................................................................ 91 5.2 Summary of PI Level Scores ...................................................................................... 91 5.3 Summary of Conditions ............................................................................................. 92 5.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ................................................. 93 5.6 Changes in the fishery prior to and since Pre-Assessment ....................................... 93 6 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 94 APPENDIX 1 – PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SCORING AND RATIONALES ................................. 100 APPENDIX 2 - CONDITIONS & CLIENT ACTION PLAN ........................................................ 159 APPENDIX 3 - PEER REVIEW REPORTS .......................................................................... 166 Reviewer 1 ...................................................................................................................... 166 Reviewer 2 ...................................................................................................................... 176 APPENDIX 4 - STAKEHOLDER SUBMISSIONS .................................................................... 183 APPENDIX 5 - SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY ..................................................................... 184 APPENDIX 6 – CLIENT AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 185 VA-Delta Kamchatka Salmon Public Certification Report 3 Executive Summary An assessment team of Ray Beamesderfer and Dmitry Lajus conducted the assessment using CR v2.0 (1 October 2014), with modifications to the default assessment tree for salmon fisheries as defined by the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). The units of assessment and certification included Pink Salmon and Chum Salmon spawning in the Ozernaya, Koshegochek, Golygina, Opala, Kol, and Vorovskaya Rivers of the West Coast of Kamchatka, and Coho salmon spawning in the Kol River. Site visits was conducted at the Vityaz Avto Company Offices and other offices in Petropavlovsk- Kamchatsky, Russian Federation on 20-25 April 2015 and 30 March 30 – 1 April, 2016. The team met with the clients, with the client’s consultant, federal and state salmon scientific and management agencies, and key stakeholders. The team also reviewed extensive written documentation provided by the client and the fishery management system. All principle scores exceeded 80 but several performance indicators scored between 60 and 80. As a result, seven conditions were identified. On the basis of this assessment of the fisheries, the Assessment Team recommends that the fisheries be certified. Following this recommendation of the assessment team, and review by stakeholders and peer-reviewers, a determination is hereby made by MRAG Americas to certify the fisheries. Principle Level Scores Final Principle Scores Principle Pink Salmon Chum Salmon Coho Salmon Principle 1 – Target Species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PICES Sci. Rep. No. 2, 1995
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD vii Part 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE OKHOTSK SEA AND KURIL REGION 3 1.1 Okhotsk Sea water mass modification 3 1.1.1Dense shelf water formation in the northwestern Okhotsk Sea 3 1.1.2Soya Current study 4 1.1.3East Sakhalin Current and anticyclonic Kuril Basin flow 4 1.1.4West Kamchatka Current 5 1.1.5Tides and sea level in the Okhotsk Sea 5 1.2 Influence of Okhotsk Sea waters on the subarctic Pacific and Oyashio 6 1.2.1Kuril Island strait transports (Bussol', Kruzenshtern and shallower straits) 6 1.2.2Kuril region currents: the East Kamchatka Current, the Oyashio and large eddies 7 1.2.3NPIW transport and formation rate in the Mixed Water Region 7 1.3 Sea ice analysis and forecasting 8 2.0 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS 9 2.1 Hydrographic observations (bottle and CTD) 9 2.2 Direct current observations in the Okhotsk and Kuril region 11 2.3 Sea level measurements 12 2.4 Sea ice observations 12 2.5 Satellite observations 12 Part 2. REVIEW OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE OKHOTSK SEA AND OYASHIO REGION 15 1.0 GEOGRAPHY AND PECULIARITIES OF THE OKHOTSK SEA 16 2.0 SEA ICE IN THE OKHOTSK SEA 17 2.1 Sea ice observations in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.2 Ease of ice formation in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.3 Seasonal and interannual variations of sea ice extent 19 2.3.1Gross features of the seasonal variation in the Okhotsk Sea 19 2.3.2Sea ice thickness 19 2.3.3Polynyas and open water 19 2.3.4Interannual variability 20 2.4 Sea ice off the coast of Hokkaido 21
    [Show full text]
  • № Approval Number Establishment Vessels Fishery Products Adress District
    List 01.09.2018 of approved Russian establishments and vessels-suppliers of fish and fishery products, including frozen adible fish by-products, to the Republic of Korea № Approval number Establishment Vessels Fishery products Adress District 1 RK-1-003 JSC "Kurilskiy rybak" Frozen fish v. Kitovyy, Kuril'skiy district Sakhalinskaya Oblast’ Yasnyy (fish plant) Frozen fish fillet Frozen fish mince Frozen fish by-products Frozen roe Frozen milt Frozen fish liver Fish meal 2 RK-1-004 "Moneron" Co., LTD. Yasnyy Вoiled-frozen сrab and extremities of 71, Chekhov str., Sakhalinskaya Oblast’ crab Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk Fresh-frozen сrab and extremities of crab Crab live 3 RK-1-005 "Kurilskiy Universal Komplex", Tor Frozen fish 71, Chekhov str., Sakhalinskaya Oblast’ Co., Ltd. Вoiled-frozen сrab and extremities of Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk crab Fresh-frozen сrab and extremities of crab Crab live 4 RK-1-011 JSC "Tralflot" Vasilyevskiy ostrov Frozen fish 31, Serysheva str. Khabarovsk Khabarovskiy Kray Frozen fish liver Frozen roe Frozen milt Frozen fish fillet Frozen fish mince Fish meal 5 RK-1-029 JSC HC "Dalmoreproduct " Pеtr Zhitnikov Frozen fish 53, Pologaya str., Primorskiy Kray Frozen fish by-products Vladivostok Frozen roe Frozen milt Fish meal Страница 1 из 87 № Approval number Establishment Vessels Fishery products Adress District 6 RK-1-032 JSC "Fishery Kolkhoz Ekarma-3 Frozen fish 12, Zelenaya str., Primorskiy Kray "Primorets" Frozen fish by-products v. Podyapolskoe, Frozen roe Shkotovskiy district Frozen milt Frozen fish liver Frozen squid 7 RK-1-035 Riko Co., Ltd Pyotr Bogdanov Frozen fish 21 A, Vulkannaya str., Kamchatskiy Kray Frozen fish by-products Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy Frozen milt Frozen roe Frozen fresh shrimp Boiled- frozen shrimp 8 RK-1-036 Collective Farm Fishery by V.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ifrc.Org Conclusion
    CHUKOTKA, KAMCHATKA AND 26 August 1999 MAGADAN (FAR NORTH-EASTERN RUSSIA): CRITICALLY ISOLATED COMMUNITIES appeal no. 05/99; 5 Month programme extension until October 15, 1999 situation report no. 5 period covered: 20 July - 25 August 1999 The Russian Far Northeast programme, launched on 8 February to assist 82,000 beneficiaries in the rural regions of Chukotka, Kamchatka, including Koryak okrug and Magadan, is in the final stages of implementation. The intended quantity of family food parcels was produced in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and Magadan, and distribution is ongoing in all four regions covered by the Appeal. Hygiene kits have also been procured for all the regions and have already been sent to Magadan for distribution. Adverse weather conditions are making air transport difficult and causing logistical constraints. The context The steady erosion of living standards and rise in unemployment associated with a decade of diffi- cult market transition and poor harvests in Russia has taken a high toll in terms of living conditions and brought with it economic inequality and heightened social instability which has been particu- larly devastating for the population of the Far North-eastern remote regions of Chukotka, Kamchatka, including Koryak okrug, and Magadan. Geographic isolation (air transport and dog sleds are the only ways to reach some remote polar areas for many months of the year) combbined with a harsh climate (with temperatures reaching -50 C during long winter months and +40 C in summer), poor infrastructure, a lack of economic diver- sity, the high cost of transport, the over-dependance on imports, and the loss of subsidies have all compounded the regions’ problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia): 2003–9 Results
    CHAPTER 6 OBSIDIAN PROVENANCE STUDIES ON KAMCHATKA PENINSULA (FAR EASTERN RUSSIA): 2003–9 RESULTS Andrei V. Grebennikov, Vladimir K. Popov, Michael D. Glascock, Robert J. Speakman, Yaroslav V. Kuzmin, and Andrei V. Ptashinsky Abstract: The results of obsidian provenance research on the Kamchatka Peninsula based on extensive study of the chemical composition of volcanic glasses from both ‘geological’ sources and archaeological sites are presented. At least 16 geochemical groups reflecting different sources of obsidian have been identified for Kamchatka using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis. Seven sources of archaeological obsidian have been linked to specific geologic outcrops, with the distances between sites and obsidian sources up to 550km. At least seven geochemical groups based only on artefact analysis are also described. The use of multiple obsidian sources was a common pattern during the Palaeolithic, Neolithic, and Palaeometal periods of Kamchatkan prehistory. Keywords: Obsidian, Source Identification, Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russian Far East Introduction 6.1, A). The main geomorphic features of the Kamchatka Peninsula are two major mountain ranges, Central and Studies of the geochemistry of waterless volcanic glasses Eastern, with a sedimentary basin between them occupied (i.e., obsidians) and sources of archaeological obsidian by the Kamchatka River drainage; mountains of the in the Russian Far East have been ongoing since the southern region; and lowlands on the western coast (Suslov early 1990s,
    [Show full text]
  • Newell, J. 2004. the Russian Far East
    Industrial pollution in the Komsomolsky, Solnechny, and Amursky regions, and in the city of Khabarovsk and its Table 3.1 suburbs, is excessive. Atmospheric pollution has been increas- Protected areas in Khabarovsk Krai ing for decades, with large quantities of methyl mercaptan in Amursk, formaldehyde, sulfur dioxide, phenols, lead, and Type and name Size (ha) Raion Established benzopyrene in Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and Zapovedniks dust prevalent in Solnechny, Urgal, Chegdomyn, Komso- molsk-on-Amur, and Khabarovsk. Dzhugdzhursky 860,000 Ayano-Maysky 1990 Between 1990 and 1999, industries in Komsomolsky and Bureinsky 359,000 Verkhne-Bureinsky 1987 Amursky Raions were the worst polluters of the Amur River. Botchinsky 267,400 Sovetsko-Gavansky 1994 High concentrations of heavy metals, copper (38–49 mpc), Bolonsky 103,600 Amursky, Nanaisky 1997 KHABAROVSK zinc (22 mpc), and chloroprene (2 mpc) were found. Indus- trial and agricultural facilities that treat 40 percent or less of Komsomolsky 61,200 Komsomolsky 1963 their wastewater (some treat none) create a water defi cit for Bolshekhekhtsirsky 44,900 Khabarovsky 1963 people and industry, despite the seeming abundance of water. The problem is exacerbated because of: Federal Zakazniks Ⅲ Pollution and low water levels in smaller rivers, particular- Badzhalsky 275,000 Solnechny 1973 ly near industrial centers (e.g., Solnechny and the Silinka River, where heavy metal levels exceed 130 mpc). Oldzhikhansky 159,700 Poliny Osipenko 1969 Ⅲ A loss of soil fertility. Tumninsky 143,100 Vaninsky 1967 Ⅲ Fires and logging, which impair the forests. Udylsky 100,400 Ulchsky 1988 Ⅲ Intensive development and quarrying of mineral resourc- Khekhtsirsky 56,000 Khabarovsky 1959 es, primarily construction materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock-Specific Distribution and Abundance of Immature Chum Salmon in the Western Bering Sea in Summer and Fall 2002–2003
    North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission Bulletin No. 5: 105-120, 2009 Stock-Specific Distribution and Abundance of Immature Chum Salmon in the Western Bering Sea in Summer and Fall 2002–2003 Alexander V. Bugaev1, Elena A. Zavolokina2, Lidiya O. Zavarina1, Alexander O. Shubin3, Sergei F. Zolotukhin4, Nina F. Kaplanova4, Mikhail V. Volobuev5, Igor N. Kireev1, and Katherine W. Myers6 1Kamchatka Fishery and Oceanography Research Institute (KamchatNIRO), 18 Naberezhnaya Street, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 683000, Russia 2Pacific Scientific Research Fisheries Center (TINRO-Center), 4 Shevchenko Alley, Vladivostok 690950, Russia 3Sakhalin Research Institute of Fishery & Oceanography (SakhNIRO), 196 Komsomolskaya Street, Yuhzno-Sakhalinsk 693016, Russia 4Khabarovsk Branch of Pacific Scientific Research Fisheries Centre (KhBrTINRO-Centre), 13/a Amursky Boulevard, Khabarovsk 680028, Russia 5Magadan Research Institute of Fishery & Oceanography (MagadanNIRO), 36/10 Portovaya Street, Magadan 685000, Russia 6School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA Bugaev, A.V., E.A. Zavolokina, L.O. Zavarina, A.O. Shubin, S.F. Zolotukhin, N.F. Kaplanova, M.V. Volobuev, I.N. Kireev, and K.W. Myers. 2009. Stock-specific distribution and abundance of immature chum salmon in the western Bering Sea in summer and fall 2002–2003. N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Comm. Bull. 5: 105–120. Abstract: Seasonal stock-specific distribution and abundance of immature chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in the western Bering Sea in summer 2003 and fall 2002–2003 were determined using scale pattern analysis. Results indicated that immature chum salmon were predominantly of Asian (Russian and Japanese) origin. There was considerable spatial and temporal variation in estimated proportions of regional stocks of chum salmon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Far East
    TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINT S IN THE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS : Chapter 5 : TILE RUSSIAN FAR EAS T AUTHOR : HOLLY STRAND THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION :* CONTRACTOR : San Diego State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Philip R . Pryde COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-04 DATE : July 27, 1994 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U .S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials fo r their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council fo r Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet - Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those ofthe author. NCSEER NOTE This report is part of a Council funded research project entitled Environmenta l Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics .
    [Show full text]
  • K. Fujita1, E. E. Dretzka2 and A. Grantz3 This Report Is Preliminary and Has Not Been Reviewed for Conformity with U. S. Geologi
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTHEAST SIBERIAN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS (SECOND EDITION) K. Fujita1, E. E. Dretzka2 and A. Grantz3 OPEN FILE REPORT 82-616 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Menlo Park, California July 1982 1. Department of Geology, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824 2. Department of Geological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60201; now at: Department of Computer Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305. 3. U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025 INTRODUCTION This bibliography is a compendium of literature available in English, either in its original form or in translation, on the geology and geophysics of northeast Siberia and adjacent seas and shelves. It is an expanded version of Fujita and Dretzka (1978-) and has been updated to include publications released through early 1982. The area! coverage extends from the edge of the Siberian platform (just east of the Lena River) on the east to the U. S. - Russia Convention Line of 1867 on the west. The East Siberian and Chukchi Seas are included as the northern limit while the Sea if Okhotsk and Kamchatka represent the southern limits. Sakhalin has been excluded and some, but not all, references to the Kuril Islands have been included. A sketch map of the area is shown in figure 1. It is hoped that this listing is nearly exhaustive for works on this area with some exceptions. Neither the Paleontological Journal nor Petroleum Geology have been indexed in this edition and, in addition, articles on Recent seismicity and volcanic activity in the Kuril-Kamchatka arc have been omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transnational Tale of Two Nationalities* : Ethnic Koreans in Sakhalin Island and North Koreans in Kamchatka, Russia
    한국민족문화 74, 2020. 2., 451~483 http://doi.org/10.15299/jk.2020.02.74.451 A Transnational Tale of Two Nationalities* : Ethnic Koreans in Sakhalin Island and North Koreans in Kamchatka, Russia 1) Chaimun Lee**ㆍKhvan Lyudmila Borisovna*** 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical Background on the Korean Diaspora in the Russian Far East(RFE) 3. Historical Sketch of Ethnic Koreans in Sakhalin and Kamchatka, Russia 4. Methodology 5. Transnationalism and the Soviet Koreans in Sakhalin and Kamchatka, Russia 6. Conclusion <Abstract> The goal of this study is to analyze diasporic aspects of North Korean migrants in Kamchatka, in comparison with those of Korean diaspora in Sakhalin. In particular, using narratives of ethnic Koreans obtained in two field surveys in Elizovo in Kamchatka, Russia and Jeonggwan in Busan, South Korea, this study tries to compare transnational practices of those Korean diaspora both in Sakhalin and Kamchatka, Russia. In this paper four transnational practices including alienation from the host countries, differences in kin-states, desire for an eventual return * This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Bokhyeon Research Fund, 2017. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the IEPAS2019 (6th Annual Conference on Eurasian Politics and Society) in Lisbon, Portugal (July 4-5, 2019). ** First author: Professor, Kyungpook National University, South Korea ([email protected]) *** Corresponding author: Professor, Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan - 451 - 2 / 한국민족문화 74 to the homeland, and Confucian ethics were analyzed and compared between those Korean immigrants in both residential areas. According to the results of the study, the closure of the political system in North Korea and the kin-state of Koreans living in the Kamchatka Peninsula caused the North Korean diaspora to confuse their feelings about their home country, but those could not weaken transnationalism among them.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No. 119
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No. 119 The cod and flounders of far-eastern seas by P.A. Moiseev Original title: Treska i kambaly dalnevostochnykh morei From: Izvestiya Tikhookeanskogo Nauchno-Issiedovaterskogo Instituta Rybnogo Khozyaistva i Okeanografii (TINRO) (Proceedings of the Pacific Scientific Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography), 40 : 1-287, 1953 Translated by the Translation Bureau Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Department of the Environment Fisheries and Marine Service BiologibarStatiOn,.Nanaimo, B. C. Biological Station, St-John's, Nfld. 1974 576 pages typescript September 7, 1 31796 - Russian (TVC) 769-18-14 Fisheries Research Board of Canada. MINISTRY OF LIGHT AND FOOD INDUSTRY OF THE USSR. NEWS OF THE TINRO. 1953 Volume XL. BY P. A. MOISEEV. THE COD AND FLOUNDERS OF FAR-EASTERN SEAS. Vladivostok. INTR.ODUCTION The Chukotsky and Bering Seas, the seas of • Okhotsk and of Japan, which was the Far Eastern Shores of the Soviet Union, cover immense areas. The multitude of animals inhabiting these seas is extremely varied. Of fish alone there are up to 800 species, among which some 200 are or can be regarded as exploitable species. Up to the present time the salmon and herring have. been of prevalent industrial importance in the Far East. The immense reserves of these fish, relative simplicity and high effectiveness of the fishing methods employed during the spawning period, simplicity of processing in- volved, excellence of quality of the finished product, all these factors appealed to industrial fishing, fish-proces- sing and fish-marketing organizations. As a result, the entire fishing industry of the Far East was until recen- tly, a passive industry --90% of the catch was obtained by means of stationary fishing implements or fishing cordage cast from the shore (such as seines and casting nets, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • WWF-Russia Kamchatka Office Semi-Annual Review. January 2018
    WWF strongly supported the increase in fines for illegal fishing initiated by the Ministry of Agriculture. Public discussion concerning the Russian government’s draft decree ended on October 9th. The decree would set fines up to 20 times higher than current levels for some species. While we do not consider these measures to be an absolute remedy, the fine amounts will be significant enough to be noticed Sergey Rafanov, by poachers. The measures can be seen as a good the Director of the starting point for further steps to stop illegal activity. Kamchatka Bering Sea Ecoregional Office However, poaching for fish isn’t only a Kamchatka problem. The WWF-Russia Kamchatka Office and its partners have valuable experience to share. In autumn, our colleagues from WWF-Russia Barents Sea Ecoregional Office came to the peninsula to learn about Kamchatka’s anti-poaching activity on the Bolshaya River. And now public inspectors will work on the Varzuga River in the Murmansk region. The operations of two mining companies in Kamchatka remain under strict examination within the framework of the Environmental Responsibility Rating and the gradation system introduced in 2017. The companies, however, did not improve their positions compared to the previous March 2017 rating. This result urges us to look for new opportunities to engage mining operators in improving the environmental aspect of their work in 2018. Thank you for being with us and stay tuned for more news to come in 2018! WWF-Russia Kamchatka Office Semi-annual Review page 2 CONTENTS: Fishing
    [Show full text]
  • ASIAN SOCKEYE SALMON (Freshwater Period of Life, Biological Structure, Population Dynamics)
    Kamchatka Research Institute of Fisheries & Oceanography (KamchatNIRO) Pacific Biological Station (Nanaimo, B.C. Canada) Victor F. Bugaev ASIAN SOCKEYE SALMON (freshwater period of life, biological structure, population dynamics) Edited by William E. Ricker and Richard J. Beamish Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky Publishing House “Kamchatpress” 2011 УДК 338.24:330.15 ББК 28.693.32 Б90 Victor F. Bugaev. Asian Sockeye Salmon (freshwater period of life, biological structure, population dynamics). – Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky : Publishing House “Kamchatpress”, 2011: 292 p. ISBN 978-5-9610-0159-4 Abstract Key words: sockeye, age, length, weight, growth, scale structure, freshwater period, food competitors, infestation, food supply, population dynamics, fishing operations. In Asia, the sockeye is the most abundant on the Kamchatka Peninsula in some years where ap- proximately 90-95 % of all the Asian sockeye is harvested in the watersheds of the Kamchatka and Ozernaya rivers alone. This study is a summary of long-term observations on the Asian sockeye, and is based on the results of the author's 20 years of research. He examines the biological charac- teristics of 38 local sockeye populations (from Iturup Is. to Eastern Chukotka). Long-term data was used to analyze the interannual variability in the growth of juvenile sockeye of the Kamchatka and Ozernaya rivers. Questions concerning the structural analysis of the scales in juveniles and spawn- ers of the sockeye are discussed in detail for the purpose of standardizing the age-determination procedure. Data on the feeding behaviour of juvenile sockeye in the watersheds of the Kamchatka and Ozernaya rivers are presented, and questions concerning the food competition of fish in the Kamchatka River watershed are discussed.
    [Show full text]