DOCSLIB.ORG

The Russian Far East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Russian Far East TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINT S IN THE FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS : Chapter 5 : TILE RUSSIAN FAR EAS T AUTHOR : HOLLY STRAND THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION :* CONTRACTOR : San Diego State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Philip R . Pryde COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-04 DATE : July 27, 1994 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U .S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials fo r their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council fo r Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet - Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those ofthe author. NCSEER NOTE This report is part of a Council funded research project entitled Environmenta l Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics . Twenty one reports, listed below , resulting from this project will be distributed seriatim by the Council, and will collectivel y become the chapters of a book to be published in 1994 by Westview Press. Eighteen of the 2 1 (written by other authors) deal with the fifteen former republics, and three (written by Dr. Philip R. Pryde, the Principal Investigator) are summarizing reports. Chapter 1: The Environmental Implications of Republic Sovereignty . (Pryde) Chapter 2: Russia - An Overview of the Federation . (Pryde) Chapter 3: European Russia. (Kochurov) Chapter 4: The Urals and Siberia . (Scherbakova & Monroe) Chapter 5: The Russian Far East. (Strand) Chapter 6: Estonia. (Soot) Chapter 7: Latvia. (Dreifelds) Chapter 8: Lithuania. (Kritkausky) Chapter 9: Ukraine. (Stebelsky) Chapter 10: Environmental Management in Ukraine . (Freeman) Chapter 11: Belarus. (Cherp & Kovaleva ) Chapter 12: Moldova. (Dinu & Rowntree) Chapter 13: Georgia. (Richards) Chapter 14: Armenia. (Valesyan) Chapter 15: Azerbaijan. (Wolfson & Daniell) Chapter 16: Kazakhstan. (Smith) Chapter 17: Turkmenistan. (Micklin) Chapter 18: Uzbekistan . (Lubin) Chapter 19: Kyrgyzstan. (Braden) Chapter 20: Tajikistan. (Eicher) Chapter 21: The View to the Future . (Pryde) Environmental Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republic s The Russian Far Eas t Holly Strand Executive Summary The following paragraphs summarize the main contents and conclusions of a chapter on the Russian Far East, which has been prepared as part of a larger work on the environmenta l and economic-geographic situation in each of the former Soviet republics . The full study , edited by Philip R . Pryde, will be published by Westview Press under the title "Environmenta l Resources and Constraints in the Former Soviet Republics . Funding assistance from the National Council for Soviet and East European Research is acknowledged with appreciation . In this chapter, the physical geography and demography of the Far East is briefly summarized, including a survey of its main economic resources and any significan t environmental constraints (climatic, geomorphologic, etc .) that affect the region's development . The contemporary state of the development of industry and agriculture within the Far East i s reviewed, with a focus on the environmental disruption that has resulted from thi s development. The current situation with regard to biotic preservation is also reviewed , including a section on the establishment of nature reserves and parks . Particular discussion is directed to the problems that currently exist with regard t o logging activities, mineral extraction, industrial processing, and agricultural practices . Specia l note is made of pollution problems in Komsomolsk, in the Dalnegorsk industrial region, and a t Lake Khanka . Problems of poor management of biotic resources is also discussed . The main conclusions of the chapter are that the Far East at present is one of the leas t polluted regions of the former Soviet Union, but that its future is difficult to predict due to th e contemporary emphasis on industrial growth, foreign investment, and private economi c development . Because of its easy access to the Pacific Rim, the Far East has both economic advantages and a high degree of environmental jeopardy . Philip R . Pryde, June 6, 1994 Chapter 5 . THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST Holly Strand The Russian Far East is a vast and varied region forming the northeastern frontier of th e Eurasian continent . Although the entire Russian territory east of the Urals is often labelle d "Siberia," the Far East is actually a separate geographic unit whose territorial size is almos t equal to that of West and East Siberia. Furthermore, there are striking differences in bot h natural conditions and the economy of the two regions, as the Far East is heavily influenced b y its proximity to the Pacific Ocean . In this chapter, the Russian Far East will be defined as the former Soviet Union's Fa r Eastern economic planning region . Its area is 6,215,900 km 2 , or 36% of the total area of the Russian Federation; this is roughly three-quarters the size of the conterminous United States . The region is divided into the following administrative sub-units : Primorskiy Krai (or territory , also called Primorye or the Maritime Province), Khabarovsk Krai, Kamchatka, Amur , Sakhalin, and Magadan Oblasts; the Republic of Sakha (sometimes given as Yakut-Sakha , formerly the Yakut Autonomous Republic), and the Jewish, Koryak, and Chukotsk Autonomous Regions . The 1990 population of the Russian Far East was only about eigh t million . Physical Setting Because of its vast size and latitudinal distribution, the Far Eastern landscape i s tremendously varied. The southernmost tip of Primorskiy Krai lies at about 42° north latitude , similar to Chicago in the United States . The northernmost point is Wrangel Island at aroun d 72°, slightly higher than Point Barrow, Alaska . In the Diomede Islands of the Bering Sea . Russia comes within 4 miles of the United States . The disputed southern Kurile Islands are similarly close to Hokkaido, Japan.' The Amur River forms a large portion of the souther n border with China . Much of the region is covered with medium to low elevation mountains, no more than 3000 meters in height. The more significant ranges are the Stanovoy Range on the norther n border of Amur Oblast, the Verkhoyansk and Chersk Ranges in Sakha, the Kolyma and Koryak Uplands in the northeast, and the volcanic ranges on Kamchatka . The Dzhugdzhur an d Sikhote Alin are coastal ranges on the Okhotsk Sea and Sea of Japan, respectively . The Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuriles are located at the eastern edge of the Asian continenta l 1 Figure 5 .2 . The harbor at Nakhodka, with an oil tanke r at center ; the tanker symbolizes the increase d environmental jeopardy that will come to th e region as it becomes more involved in th e Pacific Rim economy . plate and the western edge of the Pacific plate ; tectonic interaction between these two plate s produces an extremely active seismic zone . Soviet geologists have delineated about two fifths of the Far East as susceptible t o earthquakes destructive enough to cause large cracks in the ground, rockfalls, landslides, an d mud eruptions, and to deform ground and surface water regimes (Medvedev, 1976) . Earthquakes with epicentres off the Pacific coast are capable of generating powerful tsunamis . The area surrounding eastern Kamchatka and the Kuriles is one of the most seismically activ e places on earth, as it coincides with a subduction zone where the Pacific plate dives under th e Eurasian continent . Lively geological processes result in high mountains, volcanoes, an d occasional valleys of hot springs and geysers . The Kuriles have forty active volcanoes and Kamchatka twenty-two . Asian Russia's highest peak, Mt . Kluchevskaya, is a Kamchatka volcano which rises to 4750 meters (see Figure 5 .1). The largest rivers are the Amur and the Lena, ninth and tenth longest in the world (441 6 km and 4400 km, respectively) . Among other Russian rivers, only the Ob' is longer . The Lena, Indigirka, and Kolyma all flow north into the arctic seas, while the Amur flows mainl y eastward and empties into the Tatar Strait, near Sakhalin Island . Over six thousand miles of coastline gives Russia a considerable strategic presence in the Pacific . With the secession of the Baltic republics and Ukraine, and therefore reduced access t o the Atlantic, the importance of this presence has intensified . There are some excellent natura l harbors, such as Vladivostok and Nakhodka, but icebreakers must operate to keep many o f them open (Figure 5.2) . The Sea of Okhotsk is frozen for much of the year and even the Se a of Japan is completely free of ice for only a few months . Climatic conditions in the Far East are highly variable. The precipitation regime i s complicated by great fluctuations, and both flooding and droughts are not uncommon . Much of the coast is under the influence of a variable monsoon climate regime . Summers are humid an d foggy, and the winters very dry with strong winds. Snow usually occurs in just two or three heavy storms, but evaporates quickly, leaving the soil without insulation and consequentl y encouraging the formation of permafrost .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PICES Sci. Rep. No. 2, 1995
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD vii Part 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE OKHOTSK SEA AND KURIL REGION 3 1.1 Okhotsk Sea water mass modification 3 1.1.1Dense shelf water formation in the northwestern Okhotsk Sea 3 1.1.2Soya Current study 4 1.1.3East Sakhalin Current and anticyclonic Kuril Basin flow 4 1.1.4West Kamchatka Current 5 1.1.5Tides and sea level in the Okhotsk Sea 5 1.2 Influence of Okhotsk Sea waters on the subarctic Pacific and Oyashio 6 1.2.1Kuril Island strait transports (Bussol', Kruzenshtern and shallower straits) 6 1.2.2Kuril region currents: the East Kamchatka Current, the Oyashio and large eddies 7 1.2.3NPIW transport and formation rate in the Mixed Water Region 7 1.3 Sea ice analysis and forecasting 8 2.0 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS 9 2.1 Hydrographic observations (bottle and CTD) 9 2.2 Direct current observations in the Okhotsk and Kuril region 11 2.3 Sea level measurements 12 2.4 Sea ice observations 12 2.5 Satellite observations 12 Part 2. REVIEW OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE OKHOTSK SEA AND OYASHIO REGION 15 1.0 GEOGRAPHY AND PECULIARITIES OF THE OKHOTSK SEA 16 2.0 SEA ICE IN THE OKHOTSK SEA 17 2.1 Sea ice observations in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.2 Ease of ice formation in the Okhotsk Sea 17 2.3 Seasonal and interannual variations of sea ice extent 19 2.3.1Gross features of the seasonal variation in the Okhotsk Sea 19 2.3.2Sea ice thickness 19 2.3.3Polynyas and open water 19 2.3.4Interannual variability 20 2.4 Sea ice off the coast of Hokkaido 21
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Analytical Digest No 7: Migration
    No. 7 3 October 2006 rrussianussian aanalyticalnalytical ddigestigest www.res.ethz.ch www.russlandanalysen.de MIGRATION ■ ANALYSIS Immigration and Russian Migration Policy: Debating the Future. Vladimir Mukomel, Moscow 2 ■ TABLES AND DIAGRAMS Migration and Racism 6 ■ REGIONAL REPORT Ethnic Russians Flee the North Caucasus. Oleg Tsvetkov, Maikop 9 ■ REGIONAL REPORT Authorities Hope Chinese Investment Will Bring Russians Back to Far East. Oleg Ssylka, Vladivostok 13 Research Centre for East CSS Center for Security Otto Wolff -Stiftung DGO European Studies, Bremen An ETH Center Studies, ETH Zurich rrussianussian aanalyticalnalytical russian analytical digest 07/06 ddigestigest Analysis Immigration and Russian Migration Policy: Debating the Future By Vladimir Mukomel, Center for Ethno-Political and Regional Studies, Moscow Summary While war refugees and returnees dominated immigration to Russia during the 1990s, in recent years, most immigrants are laborers who want to benefi t from the Russian economic upturn. Th ese immigrants face ex- tremely poor working conditions and they are socially ostracized by the vast majority of the Russian popula- tion. At the same time, immigration could prove to be the solution to the country’s demographic problems, countering the decline of its working population. So far, Russian migration policy has not formulated a convincing response to this dilemma. Introduction about one million immigrants returned to Russia an- he façade of heated political debates over per- nually from the CIS states and the Baltic republics. Tspectives for immigration and migration policy Most of the immigrants who resettled in Russia after disguises a clash of views over the future of Russia. the dissolution of the USSR arrived during this period Th e advocates of immigration – liberals and pragma- (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Article of a Given In- with Postdepositional Erosion
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 769–787, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-769-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Timing of exotic, far-traveled boulder emplacement and paleo-outburst flooding in the central Himalayas Marius L. Huber1,a, Maarten Lupker1, Sean F. Gallen2, Marcus Christl3, and Ananta P. Gajurel4 1Geological Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland 2Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA 3Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics (LIP), Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8093, Switzerland 4Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal acurrent address: Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRPG, 54000 Nancy, France Correspondence: Marius L. Huber ([email protected]) Received: 28 February 2020 – Discussion started: 20 March 2020 Revised: 21 July 2020 – Accepted: 11 August 2020 – Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract. Large boulders, ca. 10 m in diameter or more, commonly linger in Himalayan river channels. In many cases, their lithology is consistent with source areas located more than 10 km upstream, suggesting long trans- port distances. The mechanisms and timing of “exotic” boulder emplacement are poorly constrained, but their presence hints at processes that are relevant for landscape evolution and geohazard assessments in mountainous regions. We surveyed river reaches of the Trishuli and Sunkoshi, two trans-Himalayan rivers in central Nepal, to improve our understanding of the processes responsible for exotic boulder transport and the timing of em- placement. Boulder size and channel hydraulic geometry were used to constrain paleo-flood discharge assuming turbulent, Newtonian fluid flow conditions, and boulder exposure ages were determined using cosmogenic nu- clide exposure dating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intermediate Performance of Territories of Priority Socio-Economic Development in Russia in Conditions of Macroeconomic Instability
    MATEC Web of Conferences 106, 01028 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201710601028 SPbWOSCE-2016 The intermediate performance of territories of priority socio-economic development in Russia in conditions of macroeconomic instability Sergey Beliakov1,*, Anna Kapustkina1 1Moscow state university of civil engineering, YaroslavskoyeShosse, 26, Moscow, 12933, Russia Abstract. The Russian economy in recent years has faced the influence of a number of negative factors due to macroeconomic instability and increased foreign policy tensions. In these conditions the considerable constraints faced processes of socio-economic development of regions of the Russian Federation. In this article the authors attempt to analyze the key indicators of socio-economic development of the regions in which it was created and operate in the territories of priority socio-economic development. These territories are concentrated in the Far Eastern Federal District. The article identified, processed, and interpreted indicators, allowing to produce a conclusion on the interim effectiveness of the territories of priority socio-economic development in Russia in conditions of macroeconomic instability. 1 Introduction The main purpose of socio-economic policy is to increase the standard of living, increasing prosperity and ensuring social guarantees to the population. Without these indicators, it is impossible to imagine the effective development of civil society and of the economy as a whole. The crisis in macroeconomics and world politics led to the deterioration of the General economic situation in Russia and, as consequence, decrease in level of living of the population [1, 2]. 2 Experimental section Statistics show that in most Russian regions indicators of the level of living of the population significantly differ from similar indicators in the regional centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport to the Laptev Sea-Hydrology and Geochemistry of the Lena River
    Sediment transport to the Laptev Sea-hydrology and geochemistry of the Lena River V. RACHOLD, A. ALABYAN, H.-W. HUBBERTEN, V. N. KOROTAEV and A. A, ZAITSEV Rachold, V., Alabyan, A., Hubberten, H.-W., Korotaev, V. N. & Zaitsev, A. A. 1996: Sediment transport to the Laptev Sea-hydrology and geochemistry of the Lena River. Polar Research 15(2), 183-196. This study focuses on the fluvial sediment input to the Laptev Sea and concentrates on the hydrology of the Lena basin and the geochemistry of the suspended particulate material. The paper presents data on annual water discharge, sediment transport and seasonal variations of sediment transport. The data are based on daily measurements of hydrometeorological stations and additional analyses of the SPM concentrations carried out during expeditions from 1975 to 1981. Samples of the SPM collected during an expedition in 1994 were analysed for major, trace, and rare earth elements by ICP-OES and ICP-MS. Approximately 700 h3freshwater and 27 x lo6 tons of sediment per year are supplied to the Laptev Sea by Siberian rivers, mainly by the Lena River. Due to the climatic situation of the drainage area, almost the entire material is transported between June and September. However, only a minor part of the sediments transported by the Lena River enters the Laptev Sea shelf through the main channels of the delta, while the rest is dispersed within the network of the Lena Delta. Because the Lena River drains a large basin of 2.5 x lo6 km2,the chemical composition of the SPM shows a very uniform composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration: on the Move in Alaska
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Alaska Region Migration: On the Move in Alaska Volume 17, Issue 1 Alaska Park Science Volume 17, Issue 1 June 2018 Editorial Board: Leigh Welling Jim Lawler Jason J. Taylor Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Guest Editor: Laura Phillips Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Contributing Editor: Stacia Backensto Design: Nina Chambers Contact Alaska Park Science at: [email protected] Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at: www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Migration: On the Move in Alaska ...............1 Future Challenges for Salmon and the Statewide Movements of Non-territorial Freshwater Ecosystems of Southeast Alaska Golden Eagles in Alaska During the A Survey of Human Migration in Alaska's .......................................................................41 Breeding Season: Information for National Parks through Time .......................5 Developing Effective Conservation Plans ..65 History, Purpose, and Status of Caribou Duck-billed Dinosaurs (Hadrosauridae), Movements in Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Evidence for Pervasive Riverine Export of Soil Organic Matter from the Central Himalaya
    EGU2020-9017 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9017 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Molecular evidence for pervasive riverine export of soil organic matter from the Central Himalaya Lena Märki1, Maarten Lupker1, Ananta Gajurel2, Hannah Gies1, Negar Haghipour1,3, Sean Gallen4, Christian France-Lanord5, Jérôme Lavé5, and Timothy Eglinton1 1ETH Zurich, Geological Institute, Department of Earth Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland ([email protected]) 2Tribhuvan University, Department of Geology, Kathmandu, Nepal 3ETH Zurich, Ion Beam Physics, Zurich, Switzerland 4Colorado State University, Department of Geosciences, Fort Collins, USA 5CNRS – Université de Lorraine, Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France Soil erosion in high mountain ranges plays an important role in redistributing soil organic carbon across landscapes and may influence the global climate on different timescales [1, 2]. Here, we investigate the dynamics of soil organic matter export in the steep mountain belt of the Himalaya by tracing the provenance of soil-derived lipids in riverine sediments from nested catchments with areas ranging from 370 to 57700 km2. Branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (brGDGTs) are a suite of lipids that occur ubiquitously in soils [3, 4]. Their isomer distribution depends on environmental parameters such as the mean annual temperature of the local environment [3]. In this study, we explore the use of brGDGT distributions as a proxy for the altitudinal provenance of soil organic matter in riverine sediments of the Central Himalaya of Nepal. BrGDGT distributions in soils collected along an altitudinal profile, spanning elevations from 200 to 4450 m asl, yield a robust calibration of soil signatures as a function of elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Region with Special Needs the Russian Far East in Moscow’S Policy
    65 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’s pOLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer NUMBER 65 WARSAW JUNE 2017 A REGION WITH SPECIAL NEEDS THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST IN MOSCOW’S POLICY Szymon Kardaś, additional research by: Ewa Fischer © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITOR Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITOR Katarzyna Kazimierska CO-OPERATION Halina Kowalczyk, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Timothy Harrell GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH PHOTOgrAPH ON COVER Mikhail Varentsov, Shutterstock.com DTP GroupMedia MAPS Wojciech Mańkowski PUBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-65827-06-7 Contents THESES /5 INTRODUctiON /7 I. THE SPEciAL CHARActERISticS OF THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST AND THE EVOLUtiON OF THE CONCEPT FOR itS DEVELOPMENT /8 1. General characteristics of the Russian Far East /8 2. The Russian Far East: foreign trade /12 3. The evolution of the Russian Far East development concept /15 3.1. The Soviet period /15 3.2. The 1990s /16 3.3. The rule of Vladimir Putin /16 3.4. The Territories of Advanced Development /20 II. ENERGY AND TRANSPORT: ‘THE FLYWHEELS’ OF THE FAR EAST’S DEVELOPMENT /26 1. The energy sector /26 1.1. The resource potential /26 1.2. The infrastructure /30 2. Transport /33 2.1. Railroad transport /33 2.2. Maritime transport /34 2.3. Road transport /35 2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Amur Oblast TYNDINSKY 361,900 Sq
    AMUR 196 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST SAKHA Map 5.1 Ust-Nyukzha Amur Oblast TY NDINS KY 361,900 sq. km Lopcha Lapri Ust-Urkima Baikal-Amur Mainline Tynda CHITA !. ZEISKY Kirovsky Kirovsky Zeiskoe Zolotaya Gora Reservoir Takhtamygda Solovyovsk Urkan Urusha !Skovorodino KHABAROVSK Erofei Pavlovich Never SKOVO MAGDAGACHINSKY Tra ns-Siberian Railroad DIRO Taldan Mokhe NSKY Zeya .! Ignashino Ivanovka Dzhalinda Ovsyanka ! Pioner Magdagachi Beketovo Yasny Tolbuzino Yubileiny Tokur Ekimchan Tygda Inzhan Oktyabrskiy Lukachek Zlatoustovsk Koboldo Ushumun Stoiba Ivanovskoe Chernyaevo Sivaki Ogodzha Ust-Tygda Selemdzhinsk Kuznetsovo Byssa Fevralsk KY Kukhterin-Lug NS Mukhino Tu Novorossiika Norsk M DHI Chagoyan Maisky SELE Novovoskresenovka SKY N OV ! Shimanovsk Uglovoe MAZ SHIMA ANOV Novogeorgievka Y Novokievsky Uval SK EN SK Mazanovo Y SVOBODN Chernigovka !. Svobodny Margaritovka e CHINA Kostyukovka inlin SERYSHEVSKY ! Seryshevo Belogorsk ROMNENSKY rMa Bolshaya Sazanka !. Shiroky Log - Amu BELOGORSKY Pridorozhnoe BLAGOVESHCHENSKY Romny Baikal Pozdeevka Berezovka Novotroitskoe IVANOVSKY Ekaterinoslavka Y Cheugda Ivanovka Talakan BRSKY SKY P! O KTYA INSK EI BLAGOVESHCHENSK Tambovka ZavitinskIT BUR ! Bakhirevo ZAV T A M B OVSKY Muravyovka Raichikhinsk ! ! VKONSTANTINO SKY Poyarkovo Progress ARKHARINSKY Konstantinovka Arkhara ! Gribovka M LIKHAI O VSKY ¯ Kundur Innokentevka Leninskoe km A m Trans -Siberianad Railro u 100 r R i v JAO Russian Far East e r By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages CHAPTER 5 Amur Oblast Location Amur Oblast, in the upper and middle Amur River basin, is 8,000 km east of Moscow by rail (or 6,500 km by air).
    [Show full text]