DOCSLIB.ORG

20190523Fthorntondeclaration.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
20190523Fthorntondeclaration.Pdf EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 Final Mojave Region Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Photos Courtesy of Jim Quigg, Eyerly Dickerson, and Jerry Laursen Kennedy/Jenks Consultants June 2014 2775 North Ventura Road, Suite 100 Oxnard, California 93036 805-973-5700 805-973-1440 (Fax) Final Mojave Integrated Regional Water Management Plan June 2014 Prepared for Mojave Water Agency 22450 Headquarters Drive Apple Valley, CA 92345 K/J Project No. 1389002*00 Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................................................... xiii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... xiv List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................ xvi List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................. xvii Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Formation of the IRWM Region .................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 Regional Features ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.3 Primary Focal Points for the IRWM Plan ................................................ 1-6 1.1.4 Regional Water Management Group ........................................................ 1-6 1.1.4.1 Mojave Water Agency ............................................................. 1-7 1.1.4.2 Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.1.4.3 MWA Technical Advisory Committee ............................... 1-8 1.1.4.4 Mojave Desert Resource Conservation District ............ 1-8 1.1.4.5 Morongo Basin Pipeline Commission ............................... 1-9 1.1.5 Coordinating Committee ............................................................................... 1-9 1.1.6 Existing IRWM Plans and Previous Planning Efforts ....................... 1-10 1.2 Stakeholder Involvement ........................................................................................... 1-11 1.2.1 Overview of Stakeholder Involvement Process ................................. 1-11 1.2.2 Stakeholders/Plan Participants ................................................................ 1-11 1.2.2.1 Municipal and County Governments .............................. 1 - 1 2 1.2.2.2 Wholesale and Retail Water Purveyors, Wastewater Agencies, Flood Management Agencies, and Other Special Districts ............................. 1-12 1.2.2.3 State and Federal Regulatory and Resource Agencies ...................................................................................... 1-14 1.2.2.4 Environmental Community ................................................ 1-15 1.2.2.5 Tribal Community ................................................................... 1-16 1.2.2.6 Disadvantaged Communities ............................................. 1-16 1.2.2.7 Wastewater Agencies ............................................................ 1-17 1.2.2.8 Electrical Corporations ......................................................... 1-17 1.2.2.9 Community Organizations .................................................. 1-18 1.2.2.10 Self-Supplied Water Users .................................................. 1-19 1.2.2.11 Industry Organizations ......................................................... 1-19 1.2.2.12 Others .......................................................................................... 1-19 1.2.3 Public Outreach Process .............................................................................. 1-20 1.2.3.1 Inclusive Planning Area Outreach .................................... 1-20 1.2.3.2 Disadvantaged Community Outreach ............................. 1-21 1.2.3.3 Tribal Outreach ........................................................................ 1-22 1.2.4 Interregional Coordination ......................................................................... 1-22 1.3 Plan Development ......................................................................................................... 1-23 1.3.1 Goals for the IRWM Planning Process .................................................... 1-23 Mojave IRWM Plan, Final June 2014 Page TOC-i f:\2013\1389002 00 01 & 02_mojavewateragency_irwmp\09-reports\draft sections\final\mojave_irwm plan_final_cp 06.19.14.doc Table of Contents (cont’d) 1.3.2 Plan Development Process ......................................................................... 1-24 1.3.2.1 Overview .................................................................................... 1-24 1.3.2.2 Topics for Engagement ......................................................... 1-25 1.3.2.3 Plan Section Development and Refinement ................. 1-25 1.4 Plan Organization .......................................................................................................... 1-26 1.5 Plan Adoption .................................................................................................................. 1-26 Section 2: Region Description .................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction and Overview ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Ecological Processes and Environmental Resources ........................................ 2-8 2.4.1 Sensitive Biological Resources .................................................................... 2-9 2.4.2 Wildlife Corridors ........................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.3 Areas of Ecological Significance in the Region ................................... 2-13 2.4.3.1 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................... 2-13 2.4.3.2 Parks, Reserves and Wilderness Areas .......................... 2 - 1 9 2.5 Social and Cultural Characteristics......................................................................... 2-20 2.5.1 Demographics and Population .................................................................. 2-20 2.5.1.1 Population Projections ......................................................... 2-22 2.5.2 Economic Factors ........................................................................................... 2-23 2.5.3 Disadvantaged Communities ..................................................................... 2-24 2.5.4 Social and Cultural Values ........................................................................... 2-24 2.5.4.1 Maintenance of Agricultural Character .......................... 2-24 2.5.4.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................. 2-26 2.5.4.3 Maintenance of Recreational Opportunities ................ 2-26 2.5.4.4 Environmental Enhancement ............................................ 2-27 2.5.4.5 California Native American Tribes .................................. 2-27 2.6 Hydrologic Features ..................................................................................................... 2-28 2.6.1 Watersheds ....................................................................................................... 2-28 2.6.2 Groundwater Basins ...................................................................................... 2-29 2.6.2.1 Mojave River Groundwater Basin .................................... 2-30 2.6.2.2 Morongo Basin/Johnson Valley Area ............................. 2 - 3 2 2.6.2.3 Adjudication .............................................................................. 2-32 2.6.3 Geology ............................................................................................................... 2-35 2.7 Overview of Water Supplies ...................................................................................... 2-38 2.8 Water Related Infrastructure ................................................................................... 2-38 2.8.1 Retail Water Purveyors ................................................................................ 2-38 2.8.2 Mojave Region Infrastructure ................................................................... 2-39 2.9 Climate ............................................................................................................................... 2-40 2.9.1 Climate Change ................................................................................................ 2-41 2.10 Mojave Region Expansion Areas ............................................................................. 2-44 2.10.1 Twentynine Palms Area ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still
    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still (Photo by Harmon and Nelda King, National Park Service) In the high desert of California, flesh-colored boulders rise up out of the stark landscape and embrace a small valley where Keys Ranch stands. Strangely shaped trees cast long shadows on the sides of the simple wooden ranch structures. Animal tracks in the sand tell of the previous night's adventures when scorpions, kangaroo rats, snakes, and bobcats battled for survival. This seemingly hostile desert environment was settled much later than other more productive areas of the West. Yet it was here, in 1917, that Bill Keys chose to establish a ranch and raise a family. Keys and other 20th-century homesteaders lived much as earlier pioneers in the West had, working hard to make their marginal land holdings successful. Today, Keys Ranch is preserved as part of Joshua Tree National Park. National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior Keys Ranch: Where Time Stood Still Document Contents National Curriculum Standards About This Lesson Getting Started: Inquiry Question Setting the Stage: Historical Context Locating the Site: Map 1. Map 1: Deserts of the Southwest 2. Map 2: Portion of Joshua Tree National Park Determining the Facts: Readings 1. Reading 1: Settling in the California Desert 2. Reading 2: Life on Keys Ranch 3. Reading 3: Excerpts from Emerson’s Essay “Self-Reliance” Visual Evidence: Images 1. Colorado Desert 2. Mojave Desert 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Cultural Resources Technical Report
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices Appendix E: Cultural Resources Technical Report June 2019 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 2019 PREPARED FOR PlaceWorks PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants E-1 E-2 CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 Attn: Colin Drukker Prepared by Alex Wesson, B.A., Chris Millington, M.A., RPA and Nicole Kromarek, B.A. SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton Street Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com Contact: Chris Millington, Project Manager SWCA Project No. 31474 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 18-270 February 2019 E-3 This page intentionally left blank. E-4 Cultural Resource Technical Report for the San Bernardino Countywide Plan, San Bernardino County, California EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and Scope: In support of the forthcoming San Bernardino Countywide Plan, PlaceWorks retained SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to summarize the existing conditions of cultural resources within the study area, evaluate potential impacts that could occur to these resources because of the Countywide Plan, and to provide mitigation measures for potential impacts. The study area is composed of all unincorporated lands that are subject to the County of San Bernardino’s land use jurisdiction; also referred to as the “County Control Area,” the study area is approximately 1,623,988 acres (2,537 square miles) in area, or 12.627 percent of the approximately 12,861,026-acre (20,105- square mile) county.
    [Show full text]
  • At Joshua Tree Nafional Park Course Catalog Spring 2018
    Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park Course Catalog Spring 2018 Welcome to Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park It is hard to believe that it was almost 20 years ago that the Joshua Tree National Park Association be- gan a unique experiment to find a way to connect people who were passionate about their park with some of the finest educators in the Southland. The Desert Institute was born to provide the in-depth knowledge that so many of our annual visitors and local residents were clamoring for: day-long classes that go beyond the basics and really immerse the learners in the natural and cultural history that make Joshua Tree such a special place. I remember working here as a journeymen ranger when the first classes were offered back in 1998. That first year, we offered five weekend classes on natural history. Who would have dreamed that twenty years later we would be offering dozens of courses that span the spectrum from desert cooking to smart phone photography to bighorn sheep habitat? One of the exciting new offerings is the Joshua Tree Master Naturalist certificate program. Students who take classes for college credit can also be enrolled in a certification program that is invaluable for educators, naturalists, and guides. What will the next 20 years bring? With your help and feedback, I’m looking forward to this program evolving to continue to meet the changing needs and passions of all of us who are excited to learn about the incredible place we have chosen to call home.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Tree National Park, California
    I 29.79/3: J 78 General Management Plan Development Concept Plans Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC DOCI iMENTS DEPO° : "- • '7cM AUG 7 1995 Clliu . *\i LIBRARY JOSHUA TREE National Park • California V ® Printed on Recycled Paper Final General Management Plan Development Concept Plans Environmental Impact Statement Joshua Tree National Park Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California On October 31, 1994, Public Law 103-433 added 234,000 acres to the Joshua Tree National Monument and changed its status from national monument to national park. The land that was added by the legislation is mainly adjacent to backcountry and wilderness areas. It is largely undeveloped and its management will be addressed in the wilderness and backcountry management plan currently being developed, which will serve as an amendment to this plan. This general management plan addresses only the land that was included prior to the 1994 legislation. This General Management Plan / Development Concept Plans / Environmental Impact Statement was prepared in order to offer a proposal and two alternatives for the management, use, and development of Joshua Tree National Park. In this plan, which affects mainly the developed areas of the park, the proposal calls for a change of management and use to more adequately protect and interpret significant resources. The proposed action would result in an increased visitor awareness of opportunities and a broader range of visitor choices and experiences. Visitor contact facilities and services would be provided at each of the three main park entrances. Interpretive programs and the system of wayside exhibits would be expanded. Resource management programs would also be increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken – Full Letter
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN FINAL PROGRAM EIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices Appendix F Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken – Full Letter August 2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN FINAL PROGRAM EIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks August 15, 2019 BY EMAIL Jerry L. Blum, Countywide Plan Coordinator - Land Use Services Department County of San BernArdino 385 N. ArrowheAd Avenue, 1st Floor San BernArdino, CA 92415 Re: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report DeAr Mr. Blum: This letter is written on behAlf of Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken, owners of a property locAted in Lake ArrowheAd, County of San BernArdino, CaliforniA. The Moelleken’s property is known as ShAdy Cove. ShAdy Cove is on the NationAl Registry of Historic properties, and it is subject to an easement with restrictive covenAnts. The purpose of these comments is to provide evidence and request thAt the DrAft EnvironmentAl ImpAct Report (DEIR) be supplemented with additional anAlysis of the impActs of the County of San BernArdino continuing to fail to adopt Mills Act ordinAnces to preserve its historic properties. Along with this letter is a Dropbox link with supporting documentAtion. We would be happy to work with your teAm in supplementing the DEIR on these points. The Moellekens, along with many other orgAnizAtions, are committed to ensuring thAt valuAble historic resources are preserved given the aesthetic, environmentAl and economic benefits they confer on neighborhoods and, conversely, the negAtive impActs thAt ultimately occur when these structures deteriorAte and/or are demolished. The 2007 GenerAl Plan recognized the value of historic preservAtion and included aspirAtion goAls for the County to adopt an ordinAnce pursuAnt to the Mills Act under which property owners are grAnted relief under the tax code based upon the contributions made by those owners to restore and to preserve the resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Catalog Fall 2016 Welcome to Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park There Are Some Truly Wonderful Things About the California Desert
    Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park Course Catalog Fall 2016 Welcome to Desert Institute at Joshua Tree National Park There are some truly wonderful things about the California Desert. The thunderclouds that dominate the landscape during the monsoon rains; the incredible quality of silence that envelopes you on a hot, sunny, dry afternoon; the ex- plosion of color that greets you in a desert wash on a spring morning - these are the lasting memories that we hold on to for the rest of our lives. We have been gifted with a truly remarkable landscape and it is right in our back yards here at Joshua Tree National Park. Over 20 million people live within a three hour drive of what we like to call Southern California’s National Park.The beauty, rock climbing, and flowers called to over two million visitors to the park last year. But inspiration and solitude aside, Joshua Tree is also a world renown campus at the forefront of studies in global climate change, archaeological research on migration patterns, and the adaptability of threatened and endangered species in a changing environment. Students from around the globe use the intact ecosystem at the park as a laboratory to better understand the world we live in. The Desert Institute offers a unique opportunity to use this classroom. With some of the best instructors in the field, thousands of students have taken Dessert Institute classes in order to learn about the desert and enrich their lives. The National Park Service is delighted to be able to partner with the institute and help new legions of visitors go beyond the views and really connect with the desert and park.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert Parks
    ® 5 00 june 2 THE CALIFORNIA DESERT PARKS JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK MOJAVE NATIONAL PRESERVE A Resource Assessment National Parks Conservation Association ® STATE OF THE PARKS® Program More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a CONTENTS remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, histor- ical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are com- INTRODUCTION 1 promised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollution, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recre- ation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the status of I. THE CALIFORNIA DESERT and trends in conditions of critical resources. Only 10 percent of the PARKS ASSESSMENT 4 National Park Service’s (NPS) budget is earmarked for natural resources management, and less than 6 percent is targeted for cultur- al resources management. In most years, only about 7 percent of per- RATINGS 4 manent park employees work in jobs directly related to park resource preservation. One consequence of the funding challenges: two-thirds KEY FINDINGS 10 of historic structures across the National Park System are in serious need of repair and maintenance. NATURAL RESOURCES 12 The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks® program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and Burgeoning Regional Populations cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the Strain Delicate Desert Systems National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capaci- ty.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and History of Mines of Joshua Tree National Park
    Geology And History Of Mines Of Joshua Tree National Park GEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF MINES OF JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK D.D. Trent, Professor Emeritus, Citrus College, Glendora, CA 91741 INTRODUCTION Mining is an integral part of the history of the Joshua Tree National Park region. There are 288 abandoned mining sites in Joshua Tree National Park with 747 mine openings.1 Gold was the commodity of greatest interest. In the Pinto Mountains, immediately outside the Park, are two mining districts with numerous abandoned mines. As recently as 1998, there were eight claimants having mining claims in the Park. The sites include mill and mine sites, gravel pits, some open pits, but most were underground operations (Chris Holbeck, pers. comm., 1998). Mining activity in the region began in the 1870s, but peaked in the 1920s and 1930s. The ore produced by the many mines came mainly from gold-bearing quartz veins that intruded Mesozoic granitic rocks and Proterozoic metamorphic rocks (Tucker and Sampson, 1945; Trent, 1998). There are eight mining districts in and adjacent to Joshua Tree National Park, the 1) Twentynine Palms, 2) Dale, 1 A mine site may include several openings with some combination of shafts, open cast cuts and adits. Some sites included mills. The most recent records available show that in 1998, two claimants still held eleven patented claims, meaning the claimants hold titles to the property. These patented claims are within the old (former) Monument boundary. Six claimants held 49 unpatented claims, all in the new lands added through the California Desert Protection Act (CDPA).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report
    THE 2020-2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PROPOSED FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDICES APRIL 2020 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #20199011061 APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments SEPTEMBER 2019; REVISED MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR Impact Sciences PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE 2020–2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Prepared for Impact Sciences 811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Jessica Kirchner Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA, and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A.., RPA Principal Investigator Heather Gibson, Ph.D., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton St Pasadena, CA 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No.049443 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 19- 557 September 2019; Revised March 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F. Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken – Full Letter
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN FINAL PROGRAM EIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendix Appendix F. Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken – Full Letter The full letter can be accessed at the Countywide Plan website at www.countywideplan.com/EIR. August 2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN FINAL PROGRAM EIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendix This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks August 15, 2019 BY EMAIL Jerry L. Blum, Countywide Plan Coordinator - Land Use Services Department County of San BernArdino 385 N. ArrowheAd Avenue, 1st Floor San BernArdino, CA 92415 Re: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report DeAr Mr. Blum: This letter is written on behAlf of Dr. and Mrs. Brent Moelleken, owners of a property locAted in Lake ArrowheAd, County of San BernArdino, CaliforniA. The Moelleken’s property is known as ShAdy Cove. ShAdy Cove is on the NationAl Registry of Historic properties, and it is subject to an easement with restrictive covenAnts. The purpose of these comments is to provide evidence and request thAt the DrAft EnvironmentAl ImpAct Report (DEIR) be supplemented with additional anAlysis of the impActs of the County of San BernArdino continuing to fail to adopt Mills Act ordinAnces to preserve its historic properties. Along with this letter is a Dropbox link with supporting documentAtion. We would be happy to work with your teAm in supplementing the DEIR on these points. The Moellekens, along with many other orgAnizAtions, are committed to ensuring thAt valuAble historic resources are preserved given the aesthetic, environmentAl and economic benefits they confer on neighborhoods and, conversely, the negAtive impActs thAt ultimately occur when these structures deteriorAte and/or are demolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in the Southern California Deserts a Historic Context Statement and Research Design Bob Wick, BLM
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Mining in the Southern California Deserts A Historic Context Statement and Research Design Bob Wick, BLM Karen K. Swope Carrie J. Gregory Mining in the Southern California Deserts: A Historic Context Statement and Research Design Karen K. Swope and Carrie J. Gregory Submitted to Sterling White Desert District Abandoned Mine Lands and Hazardous Materials Program Lead U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Prepared for James Barnes Associate State Archaeologist U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Ste. W-1928 Sacramento, CA 95825 and Tiffany Arend Desert District Archaeologist U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Technical Report 17-42 Statistical Research, Inc. Redlands, California Mining in the Southern California Deserts: A Historic Context Statement and Research Design Karen K. Swope and Carrie J. Gregory Submitted to Sterling White Desert District Abandoned Mine Lands and Hazardous Materials Program Lead U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Prepared for James Barnes Associate State Archaeologist U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Ste. W-1928 Sacramento, CA 95825 and Tiffany Arend Desert District Archaeologist U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Technical Report 17-42 Statistical Research, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Mojave Region Integrated Regional
    Final Mojave Region Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Photos Courtesy of Jim Quigg, Eyerly Dickerson, and Jerry Laursen Kennedy/Jenks Consultants June 2014 2775 North Ventura Road, Suite 100 Oxnard, California 93036 805-973-5700 805-973-1440 (Fax) Final Mojave Integrated Regional Water Management Plan June 2014 Prepared for Mojave Water Agency 22450 Headquarters Drive Apple Valley, CA 92345 K/J Project No. 1389002*00 Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................................................... xiii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... xiv List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................ xvi List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................. xvii Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Formation of the IRWM Region .................................................................
    [Show full text]