DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report THE 2020-2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PROPOSED FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDICES APRIL 2020 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #20199011061 APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments SEPTEMBER 2019; REVISED MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR Impact Sciences PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE 2020–2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Prepared for Impact Sciences 811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Jessica Kirchner Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA, and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A.., RPA Principal Investigator Heather Gibson, Ph.D., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton St Pasadena, CA 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No.049443 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 19- 557 September 2019; Revised March 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Federal .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Antiquities Act of 1906 .................................................................................................................... 3 Historic Sites Act of 1935 ................................................................................................................ 3 U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (Section 4[f]) ....................................................... 3 National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 ..................................................................................... 3 Archeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior Standards and Guidelines ........... 5 Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 ................................................................... 6 Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 .......................................................................... 6 American Indian Religious Freedom Act ........................................................................................ 6 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 ................................................. 6 State ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 California Implementation of Federally and State-Mandated Historic Preservation Program ........ 7 California Environmental Quality Act ............................................................................................. 9 California Coastal Act.................................................................................................................... 10 California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050 and Sections 18950 through 18961 ................. 10 California Penal Code Section 622 – Destruction of Historical Properties ................................... 10 California Public Resources Code, Sections 5024, 5024.5, 5025, 5028, 5097.5, 5097.9, and 5097.98-99 ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Senate Bill 18 – Traditional Tribal Cultural Places ....................................................................... 11 Assembly Bill 52 ........................................................................................................................... 11 Executive Order B-10-11 ............................................................................................................... 12 Local ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 County General Plans .................................................................................................................... 12 City General Plans and Ordinances ............................................................................................... 13 Cultural Context ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Prehistoric ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Horizon I: Early Man (ca. 10,000–6,000 BC) ................................................................................ 14 Horizon II: Milling Stone (6,000–3,000 BC) ................................................................................. 14 Horizon III: Intermediate (3,000 BC–AD 500) ............................................................................. 14 Horizon IV: late Prehistoric (AD 500–Historic Contact) .............................................................. 14 Protohistoric ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Historic ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Spanish Period (1769–1821) .......................................................................................................... 16 Mexican Period (1822–1848) ........................................................................................................ 16 American Period (1848–Present) ................................................................................................... 17 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 18 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................... 18 Federal Registers ............................................................................................................................ 19 State Registers ................................................................................................................................ 20 Native American Sacred Sites .............................................................................................................. 21 Human Remains ................................................................................................................................... 25 References Cited ........................................................................................................................................ 27 i Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments Appendices Appendix A. National Register of Historic Places Listed in the SCAG Region Appendix B. National Historic Landmarks Listed in the SCAG Region Appendix C. California State Historical Landmarks Listed by Historical Period Appendix D. California Historic Places in the SCAG Region Appendix E. Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search Results Appendix F. Assembly Bill 52 Correspondence – CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Figures Figure 1. Map of the SCAG Region Showing County Boundaries. ............................................................. 2 Tables Table 1. County Policies and Ordinances Relevant to the SCAG Region .................................................. 12 Table 2. Archaeological Resources Listed in the CHRIS ........................................................................... 19 Table 3. National Register of Historic Places Properties within SCAG Region ......................................... 19 Table 4. National Historic Landmarks within the SCAG Region ............................................................... 20 Table 5. California Historical Landmarks within the SCAG Region ......................................................... 20 Table 6. California Points of Historical Interest within the SCAG Region ................................................ 20 Table 7. Sacred Lands Recorded by the NAHC in the SCAG Region Listed by County ........................... 24 Table 8. Formal Cemeteries in the SCAG Region Listed by County ......................................................... 25 ii Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments INTRODUCTION The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the lead California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) agency for the proposed 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020 RTP/SCS, Connect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service
    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Trails National Monument for Consideration in the Department of the Interior’S “Review of Certain National Monuments Established Since 1996.”1
    Submitted electronically via regulations.gov July 10, 2017 The Honorable Ryan Zinke Secretary of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Monument Review, MS-1530 Washington, DC 20240 Re: Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment regarding a Review of Certain National Monuments Established Since 1996 Dear Secretary Zinke: California Wilderness Coalition (CalWild), Defenders of Wildlife (Defenders) and the Mojave Desert Land Trust respectfully submit the following comments on Mojave Trails National Monument for consideration in the Department of the Interior’s “Review of Certain National Monuments Established Since 1996.”1 We urge you to recommend the President support Mojave Trails National Monument and uphold the protections afforded by the monument designation. We firmly believe that none of America’s national monuments should be revoked, reduced or subjected to nonconforming uses, with Mojave Trails a prime example of the Antiquities Act intent and purpose. CalWild protects and restores California’s wildest natural landscapes. These important wild places provide clean air and water, refuges for wildlife, and outstanding opportunities for recreation and spiritual renewal for people. Dedicated solely to protecting and restoring the wild places and native biodiversity of California’s public lands, CalWild works with local communities to identify wild places that need protection and builds coalitions in support of protecting these special lands. 1 82 Fed. Reg. 22016 (May 11, 2017). 1 Founded in 1947, Defenders is a national non-profit conservation organization focused on conserving and restoring native species, as well as the habitat upon which they depend. Based in Washington D.C., our organization maintains six regional field offices, including a California Regional Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
    [Show full text]
  • Green Access and Equity for Orange County
    HEALTHY PARKS, SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES: Green Access and Equity for Riverside County ABOUT THIS REPORT This policy report is a summary for Riverside County of The City Project’s 2011 report, Healthy Parks, Schools, and Communities: Mapping Green Access and Equity for Southern California, which maps and analyzes green access and equity in nine counties in Southern California—Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, Kern, Santa Barbara and Imperial—using narrative and legal analyses, geographic information system (GIS) mapping tools, and demographic and economic data. Unlike other studies, which plot either green space or population, the maps in this report plot green space in relation to population and other metrics that indicate accessibility, such as distance to the park. This report also provides multidisciplinary analyses of the vital benefits of parks and other green space to people and the environment. It describes the consequences of disparities in green access and the benefits that could be reaped in “park poor” and “income poor” communities if resources were fairly allocated. It concludes with recommendations for equitable investments in green space in Riverside County and throughout California and the nation. The goal of this work is to combine research and analyses with effective outreach to provide concerned citizens, community groups, elected and other government officials, planners, funders and other stakeholders with the best available information upon which to prioritize actions and decisions that positively impact green access and quality of life for all. Together we can help children be active, eat well, stay healthy and do their best in school and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Soils and Vegetation in World War II Military Base Camps, Mojave Desert
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Recovery of soils and vegetation in World War II military base camps, Mojave Desert Doug V. Prose and Susan K. Metzger Open File Report # 85-234 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Menlo Park, California. Contents Page INTRODUCTION 4 SETTING 5 METHODS 6 Soil Studies 6 Vegetation studies 7 RESULTS 8 Soils and Surface Hydrology 8 Camp Ibis 8 Camp old Clipper 10 Camp new Clipper 11 Camp Iron Mountain 11 Camp Granite 12 Vegetation 13 Camp Ibis 13 Camp old Clipper 14 Camp new Clipper 14 Camp Iron Mountain 15 Camp Granite 16 DISCUSSION 18 REFERENCES 27 List of Illustrations Figure 1 Desert Training Center, 1942-1944. Figure 2 Recent aerial view of Camp Granite. Figure 3 Location of study area. Figure 4 Contemporary aerial photo of new and old Camp Clipper. Figure 5 Contemporary photo of main camp road at Camp Iron Mountain. Figure 6 Recent photo of road at Camp Ibis. Figure 7 Contemporary photo of vehicle parking lot. Figure 8 Recent photo of parking lot at Camp Ibis. Figure 9 Contemporary photo of tent sites and adjacent tent road. Figure 10 Recent photo of tent sites and tent road at Camp Ibis. Figure 11 Control plot at Camp Ibis. Figure 12, 12a Metzger value system explanation and example. Figure 13 Camp Ibis. Figure 14 Establishment of vegetation in disturbed areas on a previously unvegetated surface. Figure 15 Penetrometer resistance values; Camp Ibis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment
    Cultural Resource Assessment WesPac LAX Pipeline Los Angeles County, California USGS Inglewood, Long Beach, South Gate, Torrance and Venice, California Quadrangles August 2007 Prepared for: Christopher A. Joseph & Associates Los Angeles Office 11849 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 101 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Phone: (310) 469-6739 Fax: (310) 473-9336 Prepared by: Companies, Inc. 21 Technology Drive Irvine, California 92618 949–727–9336 WesPac LAX Pipeline Cultural Resource Assessment 8/30/2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS CULTURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................1 1.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT..........................................................................2 1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................2 1.2 NATURAL HISTORY ...................................................................................2 1.3 DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ..............................................2 1.4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PREHISTORY ..................................................2 1.5 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION .......................................................4 2.0 LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING CULTURAL RESOURCES ........5 2.1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................5 2.2 FEDERAL REGULATIONS..........................................................................5 2.3 STATE REGULATIONS...............................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • RE1CEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 3MB No
    RE1CEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 3MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior MAY 0 1 2009 National Park Service ML reQISJEBOF HISTORIC PLACES National Register of Historic Places Registrat ON ^SCKW. PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual propertie ana districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items._____________________________________________________________________ 1. Name of Property Historic name Brockman Building and New York Cloak & Suit House (Annex) Other names/site number 2. Location Street & Number 520 W. 7th Street and 708 S. Grand Ave. Not for Publication N/A City or Town Los Angeles Vicinity N/A State California Code CA County Los Angeles Code 037 Zip Code 90014 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruxy Cavey and the Meeting House Megachurch: a Dramaturgical Model of Charismatic Leadership Performing “Evangelicalism for People Not Into Evangelicalism”
    Bruxy Cavey and The Meeting House Megachurch: A Dramaturgical Model of Charismatic Leadership Performing “Evangelicalism for People Not Into Evangelicalism” by Peter Schuurman A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2016 © Peter Schuurman 2016 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ! ii ! Abstract Megachurch pastors—as local and international celebrities—have been a growing phenomenon since the 1960s, when megachurches began to proliferate across North America. Why are these leaders and their large congregations so popular in an age of increasing “religious nones”? Commentators in both popular and academic literature often resort to characterizing the leadership with stereotypes of manipulative opportunists along the lines of Sinclair Lewis’ Elmer Gantry (1927) or narrow characterizations of savvy entrepreneurs who thrive in a competitive religious economy. Similarly, writers assume megachurch attendees are a passive audience, or even dupes. This dissertation challenges the Elmer Gantry stereotype and the religious economic perspectives by examining one particular megachurch pastor named Bruxy Cavey in the context of his “irreligious” megachurch community called
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Trough to Trough
    Trough to trough The Colorado River and the Salton Sea Robert E. Reynolds, editor The Salton Sea, 1906 Trough to trough—the field trip guide Robert E. Reynolds, George T. Jefferson, and David K. Lynch Proceedings of the 2008 Desert Symposium Robert E. Reynolds, compiler California State University, Desert Studies Consortium and LSA Associates, Inc. April 2008 Front cover: Cibola Wash. R.E. Reynolds photograph. Back cover: the Bouse Guys on the hunt for ancient lakes. From left: Keith Howard, USGS emeritus; Robert Reynolds, LSA Associates; Phil Pearthree, Arizona Geological Survey; and Daniel Malmon, USGS. Photo courtesy Keith Howard. 2 2008 Desert Symposium Table of Contents Trough to trough: the 2009 Desert Symposium Field Trip ....................................................................................5 Robert E. Reynolds The vegetation of the Mojave and Colorado deserts .....................................................................................................................31 Leah Gardner Southern California vanadate occurrences and vanadium minerals .....................................................................................39 Paul M. Adams The Iron Hat (Ironclad) ore deposits, Marble Mountains, San Bernardino County, California ..................................44 Bruce W. Bridenbecker Possible Bouse Formation in the Bristol Lake basin, California ................................................................................................48 Robert E. Reynolds, David M. Miller, and Jordon Bright Review
    [Show full text]
  • Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination
    Exhibit 2 – Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination
    [Show full text]
  • Rick Warren, the Megachurch Movement, and Early Twenty-First Century American Evangelical Discourse
    ABSTRACT A NEW PURPOSE: RICK WARREN, THE MEGACHURCH MOVEMENT, AND EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AMERICAN EVANGELICAL DISCOURSE by Myev Alexandra Rees This thesis is a study of Rick Warren, celebrity pastor and bestselling author of The Purpose Driven Life, and his role in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century American evangelical discourse. This thesis provides a historical, cultural, and theological description of American evangelicalism and of the megachurch movement in order to facilitate an understanding of Warren’s influence on both categories. Finally, this thesis argues that Warren’s influence and leadership are causing a cultural and theological shift within American evangelicalism. A NEW PURPOSE: RICK WARREN, THE MEGACHURCH MOVEMENT, AND EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AMERICAN EVANGELICAL DISCOURSE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Comparative Religion by Myev Alexandra Rees Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2009 Advisor ___________________________________ (Dr. Peter W. Williams) Reader ____________________________________ (Dr. James Constantine Hanges) Reader ____________________________________ (Dr. Mary Kupiec Cayton) Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: The Early Twenty-First Century American Evangelical Discourse ..............................3 Chapter 2: The Megachurch Movement
    [Show full text]
  • Burro Flats Cultural Distric
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) _DRAFT______________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation
    [Show full text]